Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 26 references

Physics to Circuit Analysis of GaN RF Integrated Circuits versus GaAs and Silicon

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Gallium nitride's takeover of RF integrated circuits is derived here from first principles, from lattice symmetry to circuit limits.

desk verdict A clean, honest synthesis of known GaN RF physics; the 'first-principles' framing oversells a derivation that mostly rests on prior work and an unfinished ionization integral. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.27625 v1 pith:3G4D3FVG submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.SYeess.SPeess.SY

Harkirat Kaur , Palak Kapoor , Rajesh Vedala This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scics.SYeess.SPeess.SY
keywords GaNRFintegratedcircuitsgalliumnitrideHEMTtwo-dimensionalelectrongasbreakdownfieldpower-frequencylimitspecificon-resistancemillimeter-wavefrontendAsvsSicomparison
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the industry migration in RF integrated circuits from silicon to GaAs and now to gallium nitride is not a matter of engineering taste but the consequence of a closed, first-principles physics chain. Starting with the non-centrosymmetric wurtzite lattice, it derives a polarization-induced, doping-free two-dimensional electron gas, a tenfold higher breakdown field, and a high saturation velocity, and compresses them into two geometry-free limits: the power-frequency product and the specific on-resistance. These limits are then mapped one-to-one onto low-noise amplifiers, power amplifiers, and switches, and quantified with a device-physics simulation comparing GaN, GaAs, and Si up to 90 GHz. A sympathetic reader would care because the chain turns material constants into circuit-level predictions, and singles out GaN-on-SiC as the only platform that keeps the advantage under high-power pulsed drive.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by two geometry-free figures of merit: V_br f_T = E_c v_sat/(2π), the product of breakdown voltage and transit-limited cutoff frequency, and R_sp_on = 4V_br^2/(µεE_c^3), the specific on-resistance of a unipolar drift region at fixed blocking voltage. Because device length cancels in both, they rank materials rather than designs and convert three measured constants—breakdown field, saturation velocity, and mobility—into circuit envelopes such as output power and switch cut-off. Underneath these limits lie the polarization-induced 2DEG, which supplies a high, doping-free channel density fixed by crystal constants, and the stiff 92 meV longitudinal-optical phonon that bo

What would settle it

Measure the breakdown field of a passivated GaN HEMT as a function of gate-drain spacing and compare the inferred field at which the ionization integral reaches unity against the predicted 3.3 MV/cm. If the field is not roughly an order of magnitude above silicon's 0.3 MV/cm—or if failure occurs first by ohmic-contact breakdown or trap-induced dispersion—the central claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that gallium nitride's dominance in RF front ends can be derived rather than merely observed. In wurtzite GaN, spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization generate a fixed bound sheet charge at an AlGaN/GaN interface; Poisson's equation with triangular-well quantization turns that charge into a degenerate two-dimensional electron gas near 10^13 cm^-2 with no intentional doping. Energy-momentum conservation for pair creation sets the avalanche-breakdown field at 3.3 MV/cm, roughly ten times silicon's and GaAs's, while optical-phonon energy relaxation sustains a saturation velocity of 2.5 x 10^7 cm/s. These constants combine into geometry-free limits V_br f_T = E_c v_sat/(2

Load-bearing premise

The whole chain rests on the breakdown model of Sec. 2.3, where the ionization coefficient is set by a bandgap-proportional threshold and a single mean free path; if the real avalanche mechanism or mean free path differs, the order-of-magnitude breakdown-field advantage that powers every circuit prediction is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • GaN-on-SiC becomes the natural platform for high-power, millimeter-wave front ends; Si cannot serve as a practical 90 GHz LNA, and GaAs yields system-level performance once limiter loss is counted.
  • The geometry-free limits make the material ranking independent of device scaling: any device must lie below the V_br f_T line and above the R_sp_on curve, so GaN's margin survives miniaturization.
  • Removing the input protection limiter in a GaN receiver eliminates an irreducible noise penalty, so the system noise figure matches or beats GaAs even though GaN's raw minimum noise figure is about 1 dB higher.
  • The doping-free channel, set by lattice polarization rather than donors, implies improved device-to-device uniformity, linearity, and radiation hardness, and restricts ion implantation to isolation and contacts.
  • Pulsed-RF simulations predict GaN delivers the fastest edges and flattest pulse tops among the three materials, which translates directly into radar range resolution and low spectral regrowth.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An extension the paper leaves implicit: Eq. (4) shows the 2DEG density is a designable function of Al mole fraction and barrier thickness, so the same first-principles chain could be used to pick an optimal composition instead of the representative x = 0.25; the nonlinear bowing term in the polarization suggests a non-monotonic optimum that the paper does not investigate.
  • The fixed noise-factor γ = 0.64 in Eq. (8) is an assumption; a field-dependent hot-electron γ would likely shift the GaN–GaAs noise crossover near 90 GHz, so the claimed 'within about 1 dB' is testable at exactly the frequencies where the model is pushed.
  • Because the thermal-droop model already shows substrate choice matters, the paper's own proposed electro-thermal co-simulation is a necessary next step: GaN-on-Si would be expected to degrade the flat-top claim, meaning the platform conclusion depends on the SiC heat path as much as on the intrinsic material chain.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a 'physics-to-circuit' framework claiming to derive the Si→GaAs→GaN progression in RF integrated circuits from first principles. It connects wurtzite symmetry and polarization-induced 2DEG formation to material figures of merit V_br f_T = E_c v_sat/(2π) and R_on^sp = 4V_br²/(µεE_c³), then maps these onto LNA noise figure, PA power/efficiency, and switch cutoff, with a MATLAB model producing simulated comparisons up to 90 GHz. The paper explicitly labels its figures as model outputs and acknowledges in Sec. 2.5 that Eqs. (6)–(7) were first tabulated in [9,10].

Significance. The comparative physics is largely standard and correct: GaN's polarization doping, high breakdown field, high saturation velocity, and thermal advantage on SiC, while GaAs retains a raw noise edge due to higher mobility and higher f_T. The paper's stated contribution—a first-principles derivation of the platform migration—is not achieved as written: the breakdown field is inserted from Table 1 after an incomplete ionisation-integral argument, and the geometry-free limits are textbook identities with measured inputs. The honest value of the paper is as a clear, well-organised review/tutorial with reproducible simulation code, and its systematic mapping of material limits to circuit functions is useful. If the overclaimed 'derivation' language is corrected or the missing calculation supplied, the paper could be a worthwhile educational contribution, but not in its present form at the level claimed.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.3] The 'derivation' of E_c ≈ 3.3 MV/cm is incomplete. The text introduces α(E) = λ⁻¹ exp(−E_th/qEλ) with E_th = 5.1 eV, but never specifies the mean free path λ, the field profile, or the device length, and never evaluates the ionisation integral ∫α dz = 1 that defines breakdown. The sentence 'The result is E_c ≈ 3.3 MV/cm' is therefore an assertion, not a derivation. Because E_c enters Eq. (6) linearly and Eq. (7) as E_c³, the entire quantitative GaN advantage rests on this unsubstantiated value. Either the full calculation must be provided, or the paper must state that E_c is an empirical input and retract the first-principles claim.
  2. [Abstract and Sec. 2.5] The abstract claims the Si→GaAs→GaN migration is 'derived here from first principles,' but Eqs. (6)–(7) are obtained by composing the textbook identities f_T = v_sat/(2πL) and V_br = E_c L, with the geometry cancelling. The manuscript itself notes (Sec. 2.5) that Eqs. (6)–(7) 'were first tabulated across materials in [9,10]' (Johnson and Baliga). Thus the central formulas are known figures of merit, not new derivations, and the ranking in Fig. 2 is forced by the measured Table 1 inputs. The language of the abstract and conclusion should be moderated accordingly, unless the intended contribution is a synthesis/teaching presentation rather than novel derivation.
  3. [Sec. 3.1 / Eq. (8)] The assertion that GaN tracks GaAs within about 1 dB in NF_min to W-band is presented as a consequence of Eq. (8), but Eq. (8) contains device-dependent parameters γ, gm, Rg, Rs that are not derived from the material physics of Sec. 2; γ is fixed at 0.64 in Sec. 4.1. The 'within 1 dB' claim therefore depends on assumed device parasitics, and the figure appears to be a simulation with these assumptions rather than a first-principles result. The text should be explicit about which terms are material-derived and which are fitted device parameters.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.3] The expression α(E) ≃ λ⁻¹ exp(−E_th/qEλ) is introduced as a 'probability that a carrier reaches Eth ballistically over a mean free path λ', but this is a simplified lucky-drift model; the text should at least define λ or cite a source for the form.
  2. [Table 1] The GaN mobility is listed as 1500–2000 cm²/V s, but Eq. (7) uses a single value; specify the value used in Fig. 2.
  3. [Fig. 2] The caption and axis labels appear garbled: 'Power-frequency limit Ecvsat/2:' and 'Conduction limit 07 Ec3' are not legible. Also, the data labels (1, 16, 28, 1354) are not clearly mapped to the two curves; please clarify.
  4. [References / Fig. 5] Reference [12] contains the note 'exact conference name unconfirmed'; this is not acceptable in a formal journal reference and should be completed or removed. In Fig. 5(b), the axis label 'time into pulse (7s)' contradicts the text '10 µs pulse'; fix the typo.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; quantitative ranking is an explicit function of measured material constants, and the incomplete E_c estimate is a support gap, not a circular step.

full rationale

The paper's central limit relations are standard identities applied to measured constants. Eq. (6) follows from the definitions f_T = v_sat/(2πL) and V_br ≈ E_c L; the geometry cancels, leaving E_c v_sat/(2π). Eq. (7) follows from a triangular-field unipolar drift region, L = 2V_br/E_c, with charge set by Gauss's law. These are derivations, not conclusions assumed as inputs. Figure 2 is explicitly computed from 'Eqs. (1)–(4) with measured elastic and piezoelectric constants' and 'parameters of Table 1', so the ranking is a transparent composition of measured constants, not a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction. The paper's own words acknowledge Eqs. (6)–(7) 'were first tabulated across materials in [9,10]', i.e., they are textbook figures of merit, not novel circular constructs. Sec. 2.3 does attempt a first-principles estimate of E_c, but it stops at 'The result is E_c ≈3.3 MV/cm' without specifying λ or evaluating the ionization integral ∫α dz = 1; this is an omitted calculation and an unsupported premise, which is a correctness/evidence risk rather than a circularity. The same applies to the v_sat estimate (2.8 vs. accepted 2.5 × 10^7 cm/s). There are no load-bearing self-citations: the references are to Ambacher, Johnson, Baliga, and other external measurements/device reports, with no author overlap. The claimed 'first principles' chain is therefore not circular; at most it is incomplete at one step.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's numbers are dominated by measured inputs (µ, v_sat, E_c, ε_r, ℏω_LO) from Table 1; the 'derived' limits (Eqs 6-7) are textbook identities composed of those inputs. E_c is the least supported entry: a mechanism is sketched and a value asserted (Sec 2.3). No new physics entities are introduced; all assumptions are standard device-physics or mathematical modeling choices, with the avalanche/transport premises being the most fragile.

free parameters (7)
  • E_c (breakdown field) = 3.3 MV/cm
    Asserted in Sec 2.3 after a sketch; effectively an input/known constant used in Table 1 and Eqs (6)-(7).
  • v_sat (saturation velocity) = 2.5×10^7 cm/s
    Input from refs [7,8]; the paper's own estimate (2.8×10^7 cm/s) is only used to validate the input.
  • µ (GaN mobility) = 1500–2000 cm²/Vs
    Measured input from Table 1; used in Eqs (7)-(8) and the model.
  • γ (channel noise factor) = 0.64 (K = 1.6)
    Chosen constant in the noise model, Sec 4.1.
  • λ (mean free path in ionisation coefficient) = not specified
    Underspecified in Sec 2.3; required to compute E_c from α(E) = λ⁻¹ exp(−E_th/qEλ) but never given.
  • R_th, τ_th (thermal single-pole parameters) = not listed
    Model parameters for pulse-top droop (Sec 4.1); values not provided.
  • d (barrier thickness) and x (Al mole fraction) = d ≈ 20 nm, x = 0.25
    Representative device parameters used in Eq (4) for Fig 1.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Wurtzite GaN (space group P6_3mc) is non-centrosymmetric and admits spontaneous polarization on the c-axis.
    Sec 2.1; standard crystallography, cited via [3].
  • domain assumption Coherent pseudomorphic AlGaN on relaxed GaN with a free surface (σ_zz = 0) determines the strain state.
    Sec 2.1, Eq (2); standard linear elasticity of heteroepitaxy.
  • domain assumption Pair-creation threshold is set by momentum/energy conservation with parabolic equal-mass bands: E_th ≈ 1.5 E_g.
    Sec 2.3 approximation, not a rigorous band-structure calculation.
  • domain assumption Avalanche breakdown occurs when the ionisation integral ∫α dz = 1 with α(E) = λ⁻¹ exp(−E_th/qEλ).
    Sec 2.3; standard phenomenological impact-ionisation form but the integration is never performed.
  • domain assumption Saturation velocity is set by optical-phonon energy balance: v_sat ≈ sqrt(ℏω_LO/m*).
    Sec 2.4; estimate-level model, validated against the accepted value rather than derived exactly.
  • domain assumption A device simultaneously satisfies f_T = v_sat/(2πL) and V_br = E_c L on the same length L.
    Sec 2.5; the geometry cancellation in Eq (6) assumes transit-time-limit and breakdown-limit coexist as stated.
  • domain assumption Fukui two-port noise model: S_v = 4k_BT(R_g+R_s), S_id = 4k_BTγg_m, and the F_min expression in Eq (8).
    Sec 3.1; standard small-signal noise model, cited via [11].
  • standard math Triangular-well quantisation with Airy-function eigenvalues and constant 2D density of states.
    Sec 2.2, Eq (5); standard quantum mechanics with an approximate linear potential.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Physics to Circuit Analysis of GaN RF Integrated Circuits versus GaAs and Silicon." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3G4D3FVG

@misc{pith2026260727625,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Physics to Circuit Analysis of GaN RF Integrated Circuits versus GaAs and Silicon},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3G4D3FVG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.27625}
}
read the original abstract

The migration of radio-frequency (RF) integrated-circuit platforms from silicon to GaAs and now to gallium nitride is derived here from first principles. The hexagonal non-centrosymmetric GaN lattice admits a macroscopic polarization; elasticity and the piezoelectric tensor fix the bound sheet charge at an AlGaN/GaN interface, and Poisson's equation with triangular-well quantisation yields a degenerate quasi-two-dimensional channel of ~10^13 cm^-2 with no doping. Energy-momentum conservation for pair creation and phonon-limited energy relaxation set the breakdown field (3.3 MV/cm) and saturation velocity (2.5 x 10^7 cm/s), which combine into geometry-free limits V_brf_T = E_cv_sat/(2pi) and R_on^sp = 4V_br^2/(muepsilonE_c^3). These limits are mapped onto the low-noise amplifier, power amplifier, and switch/phase-shifter functions of a transmit/receive front end and quantified by a MATLAB device-physics model comparing GaN, GaAs, and Si up to 90 GHz. The purpose of this framework and its simulations is to identify which material platform offers the best performance at millimeter-wave frequency signals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27625 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Simulated polarization bound charge and chan [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Simulated intrinsic material limits normalised [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. One GaN process serves HPA, LNA, phase shifters (ϕ), and the T/R switch; the overload-tolerant receiver relaxes the need for a circulator/limiter. overlap: for half-sinusoidal current, ηD = π 4 Vbr − Vknee Vbr + Vknee , (10) and shaping the voltage towards a square wave with harmonic terminations removes the residual overlap; the power-added efficiency PAE = (Pout−Pin)/PDC = ηD(1− 1/G) reaches 57% at X-band with int… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Cascode GaN HEMT LNA: inductive source degeneration (Ls) sets a simultaneous noise/impedance match at 50 Ω; the common-gate device adds gain and reverse isolation [16]. edge (largest usable gain-bandwidth at the required volt￾age swing) with the flattest top, because t…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulated minimum noise figure versus fre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    GaN MMIC technology for microwave and millimeter-wave applications,

    M. Micovic, A. Kurdoghlian, H. P. Moyer, P. Hashimoto, A. Schmitz, I. Milosavljevic, P. J. Willadsen, W.-S. Wong, J. Duvall, M. Hu, M. Wetzel, and D. H. Chow, “GaN MMIC technology for microwave and millimeter-wave applications,” inIEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Sympo- sium (CSIC) Digest, pp. 173–176, 2005.https://ieeexplore. ieee.org/docum...

    arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    A review of GaN on SiC high electron- mobility power transistors and MMICs,

    R. S. Pengelly, S. M. Wood, J. W. Milligan, S. T. Sheppard, and W. L. Pribble, “A review of GaN on SiC high electron- mobility power transistors and MMICs,”IEEE Transactions 5 on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 1764– 1783, 2012.https://scispace.com/pdf/a-review-of-gan- on-sic-high-electron-mobility-power-4mjzeqemry.pdf

    2012

  3. [3]

    Morkoç,Nitride Semiconductors and Devices, vol

    H. Morkoç,Nitride Semiconductors and Devices, vol. 32 of Springer Series in Materials Science. Berlin: Springer, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58562-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58562-3 1999

  4. [4]

    Two dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization in undoped and doped AlGaN/GaN heterostructures,

    O. Ambacher, B. Foutz, J. Smart, J. R. Shealy, N. G. Weimann, K. Chu, M. Murphy, A. J. Sierakowski, W. J. Schaff, L. F. Eastman, R. Dimitrov, A. Mitchell, and M. Stutzmann, “Two dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization in undoped and doped AlGaN/GaN heterostructures,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 3...

    2000

  5. [5]

    Two-dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization charges in N- and Ga-face AlGaN/GaN heterostructures,

    O. Ambacher, J. Smart, J. R. Shealy, N. G. Weimann, K. Chu, M. Murphy, W. J. Schaff, L. F. Eastman, R. Dimitrov, L. Wittmer, M. Stutzmann, W. Rieger, and J. Hilsenbeck, “Two-dimensional electron gases induced by spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization charges in N- and Ga-face AlGaN/GaN heterostructures,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. ...

    1999

  6. [6]

    Neuberger,III–V Semiconducting Compounds

    M. Neuberger,III–V Semiconducting Compounds. Culver City, CA: Electronic Properties Information Center, Hughes Aircraft Co., 1971

    1971

  7. [7]

    Quay,Gallium Nitride Electronics, vol

    R. Quay,Gallium Nitride Electronics, vol. 96 ofSpringer Se- ries in Materials Science. Springer, 2008.https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-540-71892-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71892-5 2008

  8. [8]

    GaN-based transistors for high-frequency applications,

    T. Palacios and U. K. Mishra, “GaN-based transistors for high-frequency applications,” inComprehensive Semicon- ductor Science and Technology, Sec. 5.06, Elsevier, 2011. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288207184_ GaN-Based_Transistors_for_High-Frequency_Applications

    arXiv 2011

Show all 26 references
  1. [9]

    Physical limitations on frequency and power parameters of transistors,

    E. O. Johnson, “Physical limitations on frequency and power parameters of transistors,”RCA Review, vol. 26, pp. 163–177, 1965.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1147520

    1965

  2. [10]

    Power semiconductor device figure of merit for high-frequency applications,

    B. J. Baliga, “Power semiconductor device figure of merit for high-frequency applications,”IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 10, pp. 455–457, 1989.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/43098/

    1989

  3. [11]

    Optimal noise figure of microwave GaAs MES- FETs,

    H. Fukui, “Optimal noise figure of microwave GaAs MES- FETs,”IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1032–1037, 1979.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/1480119/

    1979

  4. [12]

    An AlGaN/GaN HEMT- based monolithic integrated x-band low noise amplifier,

    P. Lei, C. Xiaojuan, and L. Xinyu, “An AlGaN/GaN HEMT- based monolithic integrated x-band low noise amplifier,” inIn- stitute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Bei- jing (IEEE; exact conference name unconfirmed – see IEEE Xplore Document 6238209).https://ieeexp...

  5. [13]

    Design of a Ku-band AlGaN/GaN low noise amplifier,

    F. Guo and Z. Yao, “Design of a Ku-band AlGaN/GaN low noise amplifier,” in2014 3rd Asia-Pacific Confer- ence on Antennas and Propagation (APCAP), (Harbin, China), pp. 1406–1408, 2014.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ abstract/document/6992789/

    2014

  6. [14]

    Wideband W-band GaN LNA MMIC with state-of-the-art noise figure,

    S. Lardizabal, K. C. Hwang, J. Kotce, A. Brown, and A. Fung, “Wideband W-band GaN LNA MMIC with state-of-the-art noise figure,” inIEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium (CSICS),2016. Invited;https://doi.org/ 10.1109/CSICS.2016.7751079

    2016

  7. [15]

    Highly robust x-band LNA with extremely short recovery time,

    M. Rudolph, M. Dewitz, A. Liero, I. Khalil, N. Chaturvedi, C. Wipf, R. M. Bertenburg, J. Miller, J. Würfl, W. Heinrich, and G. Tränkle, “Highly robust x-band LNA with extremely short recovery time,” inIEEE MTT-S International Mi- crowave Symposium (IMS) Digest, pp. 781–784, 20...

    2009

  8. [16]

    A reconfigurable S-/X-band GaN cascode LNA MMIC,

    K. W. Kobayashi, C. Campbell, C. Lee, J. Gallagher, J. Shust, and A. Botelho, “A reconfigurable S-/X-band GaN cascode LNA MMIC,” inIEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium (CSICS), (Miami, FL, USA), 2017.https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8240424/

    2017

  9. [17]

    X- and Ku-band internally matched GaN ampli- fiers with more than 100 w output power,

    H. Noto, H. Maehara, H. Uchida, M. Koyanagi, H. Utsumi, J. Nishihara, H. Otsuka, K. Yamanaka, M. Nakayama, and Y. Hirano, “X- and Ku-band internally matched GaN ampli- fiers with more than 100 w output power,” inProceedings of the 7th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Con...

    2012

  10. [18]

    X-band internally harmonic controlled GaN HEMT amplifier with 57% power added efficiency,

    K. Yamanaka, T. Morimoto, S. Chaki, M. Nakayama, and Y. Hirano, “X-band internally harmonic controlled GaN HEMT amplifier with 57% power added efficiency,” inPro- ceedings of the 6th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (EuMIC), (Manchester, UK), pp. 61–64, 2011. ...

    2011

  11. [19]

    GaN MMIC PAs for e-band (71 GHz–95 GHz) radio,

    M. Micovic, A. Kurdoghlian, H. P. Moyer, P. Hashimoto, M. Hu, M. Antcliffe, P. J. Willadsen, W. S. Wong, R. Bowen, I. Milosavljevic, Y. Yoon, A. Schmitz, M. Wetzel, C. McGuire, B. Hughes, and D. H. Chow, “GaN MMIC PAs for e-band (71 GHz–95 GHz) radio,” inIEEE Compound Semicond...

    2008

  12. [20]

    GaN based l-band high power and high efficiency pulsed transmitter,

    S. K. Garg, S. Aich, and J. Dhar, “GaN based l-band high power and high efficiency pulsed transmitter,” in2015 IEEE International Microwave and RF Conference (IMaRC), (Ahmedabad, India), pp.155–158, 2015.https://ieeexplore. ieee.org/document/7411438

    2015

  13. [21]

    Meneghesso, M

    G. Meneghesso, M. Meneghini, and E. Zanoni, eds.,Gallium Nitride-enabled High Frequency and High Efficiency Power Conversion. Springer, 2018.https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-77994-2

    2018 doi

  14. [22]

    GaN HEMTs technology and applications (chapter 14),

    G. I. Ng and S. Arulkumaran, “GaN HEMTs technology and applications (chapter 14),” inNano-Semiconductors: Devices and Technology(K. Iniewski, ed.), pp. 377–414, CRC Press / Routledge, 2011.https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/ 10.1201/b11388-18

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    GaN technology for radars,

    C. S. Whelan, N. J. Kolias, S. Brierley, C. MacDonald, and S. Bernstein, “GaN technology for radars,” inCS MANTECH Conference, (Boston, MA, USA), 2012.https://csmantech. org/paper/gan-technology-for-radars/; PDF:https:// myreader.toile-libre.org/uploads/My_62d4ce79be28c.pdf

    2012

  16. [24]

    Ion implantation in group III-nitride semicon- ductors: A tool for doping and defect studies,

    J. C. Zolper, “Ion implantation in group III-nitride semicon- ductors: A tool for doping and defect studies,”Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 178, pp. 157–167, 1997.https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-0248(97)00076-6

    1997 doi

  17. [25]

    Electrical and structural characterization of ion implanted GaN,

    M. Usman, A. Nazir, T. Aggerstam, M. K. Linnarsson, and A. Hallén, “Electrical and structural characterization of ion implanted GaN,”Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, vol. 267, pp. 1561–1563, 2009.https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.01.091

    2009 doi

  18. [26]

    S. J. Pearton, C. R. Abernathy, and F. Ren,Gallium Nitride Processing for Electronics, Sensors and Spintronics. Springer, 2006.https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-359-0. 6

    2006 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.