Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 56 references

Mixed-phase TiO2 nanoparticles enable room-temperature optical detection of oxygen at concentrations as low as a few tens of ppm, using the ratio of anatase and rutile photoluminescence.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-07-31 23:36 UTC pith:NODQBTJE

load-bearing objection A credible room-temperature O2 sensing demo with a ratiometric TiO2 PL scheme, but the quantitative claims outrun the error bars. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.27885 v1 pith:NODQBTJE submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Oxygen Sensing Without Organic Molecules: Mixed-phase TiO2 as Cost-effective Ultrasensitive Optical Sensors

R.Rega , A.Fioravanti , F.Borbone , M.Mazzocchi , S.Lettieri This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords oxygen sensingtitanium dioxideanataserutilephotoluminescenceratiometric sensorLangmuir adsorptionroom-temperature gas sensor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that oxygen can be sensed optically at room temperature down to tens of ppm using only inexpensive, stable TiO2 nanoparticles, with no organic dye. The trick is to use mixed-phase powders in which anatase and rutile emit in separate bands that respond oppositely to O2: anatase visible PL is quenched, rutile near-infrared PL is enhanced. Taking the ratio of the two bands gives a response of 1.7 at 30 ppm and 6.3 at 500 ppm for the best sample, and the calibration follows a Langmuir adsorption curve. If true, this offers a dollar-per-gram, drift-resistant optical oxygen sensor that avoids both costly organic indicators and high-temperature chemoresistive operation.

Core claim

For mixed-phase TiO2 nanoparticles prepared by wet-chemical synthesis and calcined at 650–700 °C, the total ratiometric response R_tot=(I_nir/I_vis)/(I0_nir/I0_vis) tracks O2 concentration from 30 to 500 ppm at room temperature, with a Langmuir-type calibration R(C)=1+aC/(1+bC). The anatase visible band weakens and the rutile near-infrared band strengthens on O2 exposure, so the product of the two individual responses amplifies the signal; the authors report R_tot=1.7 at 30 ppm, rising to 6.3 at 500 ppm, and demonstrate repeatability on repeated 80 ppm exposures. They also show that illumination conditions matter: continuous UV exposure causes baseline drift, while a targeted-illumination pr

What carries the argument

The central object is the mixed-phase TiO2 nanoparticle film and its two simultaneously measured photoluminescence bands: anatase emits in the visible (≈450–700 nm, peak ≈520 nm) and is quenched by O2, while rutile emits in the near-infrared (≈780–920 nm, peak ≈840 nm) and is enhanced by O2. The transduction signal is the ratiometric response R_tot=R_vis·R_nir, where R_vis=I0,vis/I_vis and R_nir=I_nir/I0,nir. This ratio amplifies the response compared to single-phase sensing and is calibrated with the Langmuir function R(C)=1+aC/(1+bC), connecting the PL change to adsorbed O2 surface density.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calibration rests on the assumption that the measured photoluminescence changes are caused specifically by Langmuir-type adsorption of O2 onto the TiO2 surface, with a stable N2 baseline; humidity, other gases, or UV-induced drift would shift the response.

What would settle it

Run the same targeted-illumination protocol on S700 with pure nitrogen for the full experimental window and with nitrogen that has been humidified or spiked with a different gas: if R_tot drifts or responds to the non-O2 gas, the Langmuir O2 calibration is not measuring O2 alone. A complementary check is to measure the O2 adsorption isotherm on the same powder and see whether the PL response scales with adsorbed oxygen coverage.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • O2 concentrations in the 30–500 ppm range can be read from a simple optical ratio at room temperature, a regime where chemoresistive sensors usually need heaters.
  • The sensitive material is a wet-chemical TiO2 powder costing dollars per gram, removing the cost and stability barriers of organic oxygen indicators.
  • Targeted illumination (shuttering the excitation except during acquisition) is necessary to avoid UV-induced baseline drift; this defines the operating protocol for practical devices.
  • The Langmuir calibration function gives a direct relationship between response and concentration, enabling quantitative readout without empirical lookup tables.
  • Repeated 80 ppm exposures show the response can cycle without high-temperature regeneration, suggesting good reversibility for continuous monitoring.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the O2-specific Langmuir mechanism is confirmed under controlled humidity, the same ratiometric scheme could be extended to other metal-oxide polymorph pairs, not just anatase/rutile.
  • The response's dependence on particle size and rutile fraction (S700 vs S650) hints that calcination temperature could be tuned to trade sensitivity against response speed; the paper does not explore this optimization.
  • A practical extension would be to replace the Xe lamp/monochromator excitation with a low-cost 370 nm LED and two filtered photodiodes; the paper's spectral separation makes this straightforward in principle.
  • The absence of humidity control means the most immediate test is whether the calibration holds in ambient air; if humidity interferes, the sensor would need a humidity reference channel or a water-impermeable coating.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a room-temperature optical oxygen sensor based on mixed-phase TiO2 nanoparticles. By simultaneously recording the visible (anatase) and near-infrared (rutile) photoluminescence bands under 370 nm excitation, the authors define a ratiometric response R_tot = (I_nir/I_vis)/(I0_nir/I0_vis) and show responses that increase with O2 concentration in the 30–500 ppm range, with R_tot = 1.7 at 30 ppm and 6.3 at 500 ppm for sample S700. The response versus concentration is fitted with a Langmuir function, and comparisons to chemoresistive literature are used to argue that this approach is more sensitive and operates at room temperature. The authors also show that continuous UV illumination causes baseline drift, and that a 'targeted illumination' protocol (3 s exposure every 30 s) mitigates this drift.

Significance. If the quantitative claims are supported, this work offers a genuinely inexpensive, simple, and room-temperature optical route to ppm-level O2 detection, potentially filling a gap left by chemoresistive sensors that typically require high temperatures or UV activation. The use of a ratiometric signal from two phases is an elegant way to amplify response, and the cost comparison with organic luminophores is relevant. The paper is largely empirical, and its core observation—that O2 exposure reversibly changes the PL of mixed-phase TiO2 with opposite sign in the two bands—is credible from the presented time traces. However, the manuscript currently lacks the statistical validation, baseline-stability evidence, and control experiments needed to support the specific detection limit and the Langmuir calibration.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Table 2 and Fig. 7] All response values in Table 2 and the calibration points in Fig. 7 are single measurements; no error bars, replicate counts, or standard deviations are provided. The Langmuir fits and the comparison with literature sensors in Table 3 are therefore not statistically supported. Additionally, no formal limit of detection (e.g., 3σ criterion) is reported, so the abstract's 'few tens of ppm' claim is not quantitatively defined. Please include replicate statistics, confidence intervals on the fitted parameters a and b, and a stated LOD.
  2. [§3.1, Fig. 8 and targeted illumination] The targeted-illumination baseline stability is asserted but not demonstrated quantitatively. Figure 8 shows that uninterrupted illumination drifts, and the red curve is claimed to have no drift, but no error bars, long-term N2-only test, or drift rate are given. Because R_vis, R_nir, and R_tot are all normalized to I0 taken in N2, any cumulative UV-induced change (photoadsorption, oxygen-vacancy formation, or surface reconstruction) will directly bias the response amplitudes and the extracted Langmuir parameters. The authors should provide a quantitative baseline-stability test over the full experimental duration, ideally with multiple cycles and a stated drift bound.
  3. [§3.1, gas-control and mechanism] The attribution of the PL changes to Langmuir adsorption of O2 is inferred solely from the shape of the response curve, citing refs [42,43], which concern SnO2 and a-SiC, not TiO2 adsorption. No direct adsorption isotherm measurement is presented, and the only inert background gas is N2. Humidity and trace impurities (e.g., in gas lines) are not controlled, and no test with Ar or with a humidified/dry N2 stream is reported. These controls are needed to rule out non-O2 contributions to the signal and to justify the claim that the response is proportional to adsorbed O2 surface density.
  4. [§4 and Table 3] The claim that the sensitivity 'exceeds the sensitivity of most standard chemoresistive sensors' is not fully supported by the comparison in Table 3 because response definitions differ (some entries are ΔR/R0, others R_g/R0), operating temperatures and UV illumination vary, and no detection limits are given for the cited literature values. A more rigorous comparison, normalizing response metrics and stating detection limits for both the present sensor and the cited works, is needed before this comparative claim can be accepted.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The abstract states a detection range of 30–500 ppm, but the Introduction says '20–500 ppm.' Please make these consistent.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption says 'S7500' instead of S700. Please correct the typo.
  3. [§3.1, near Eq. (1)] The definitions of R_vis and R_nir are correct but would be clearer with explicit dependence on time or concentration, e.g., R_vis(C) = I0,vis/I_vis(C).
  4. [Fig. 8] The y-axis label reads 'PL intensity (cps*nm)' but the curves are described as dynamical responses R_vis; this is inconsistent and should be corrected.
  5. [§4, typo] The sentence 'The optical sensing methodology explored here investigated here offers' contains a duplicated phrase; please proofread.
  6. [References] Refs [42,43] are not obviously relevant to Langmuir adsorption of O2 on TiO2; please cite more directly relevant TiO2 adsorption/PL studies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: new PL response measurements with an empirical Langmuir calibration; self-citations are corroborated by in-paper data.

full rationale

The paper is an empirical characterization rather than a derivation. The response metrics R_vis, R_nir, and R_tot are defined from measured PL integrals (Sec. 3.1), and R_tot = R_vis * R_nir is an explicit definition, not a predicted quantity. The central quantitative claims (R_tot = 1.7 at 30 ppm, 6.3 at 500 ppm for S700) are new measurements reported in Fig. 4 and Table 2, and the Langmuir function R(C)=1+aC/(1+bC) is fitted to those measured response data in Fig. 7; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The mechanistic premise of opposite-sign anatase/rutile PL responses is attributed to the authors' prior papers [39,40], but it is also directly demonstrated in the present data (Fig. 3C and the S700 dynamics), so the self-citation is not the sole load-bearing support. The ratiometric-enhancement argument from [41] motivates the metric but does not enter the calibration. Refs [42,43] are invoked for the proportionality between PL change and adsorbed O2 density, but the Langmuir fit is an independent empirical observation; whether that proportionality is adequately supported is a correctness/reference question, not a circularity. The baseline-drift and humidity-control concerns raised by the targeted-illumination protocol are experimental validity risks, not cases where a claimed prediction reduces by construction to an input. No specific equation or fitted parameter is shown to be equivalent to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities, particles, or forces are postulated. The only invented quantity is the composite response metric R_tot = R_vis·R_nir, which is a defined signal rather than a new physical entity; it does amplify the reported response magnitude, which matters for the 'outperforming' comparison against chemoresistive metrics.

free parameters (3)
  • Langmuir parameter a (per response curve) = not reported
    Fitted to R(C)=1+aC/(1+bC) for each of R_vis, R_nir, R_tot for S650 and S700 in Fig 7; values not given in the paper, so the claimed goodness of calibration cannot be checked.
  • Langmuir parameter b (per response curve) = not reported
    Same fit; controls the saturation plateau of the calibration curve. Not tabulated anywhere in the manuscript.
  • Spectral integration windows Δλ=500-650 nm and 800-900 nm = chosen by hand
    The band limits defining R_vis and R_nir are chosen where the two PL bands lie; different windows would change the response magnitudes, and no spectral decomposition is shown to prove clean band separation.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Anatase PL decreases and rutile PL increases upon O2 exposure (opposite-sign responses)
    Taken from self-cited prior work refs [39,40]; the entire ratiometric scheme depends on the opposite signs. Not re-verified in this paper beyond the observed spectra.
  • domain assumption PL intensity change is directly proportional to surface density of adsorbed O2 (Langmuir kinetics)
    Invoked in §3.1 to justify the calibration functional form, with refs [42,43]; no direct adsorption measurement in the paper.
  • domain assumption Targeted illumination baseline in N2 is stable; UV-induced drift seen in uninterrupted mode (Fig 8) does not affect targeted data
    The drift mechanism is not characterized; the claim that 3-s illumination avoids it is empirical but unquantified.
  • domain assumption Gas mixtures from N2 (99.9995%) and certified 100/5000 ppm O2 cylinders are accurate, dry, and cross-contamination-free
    §2.3; no humidity or flow-stability verification reported.
  • standard math Standard Rietveld refinement and Williamson-Hall analysis give correct phase fractions and crystallite sizes
    §2.2, standard crystallography.
  • domain assumption The 500-650 nm and 800-900 nm windows isolate anatase and rutile emission without significant cross-talk or background
    §3.1; no spectral decomposition shown to prove the bands are cleanly separated.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 14234 in / 17528 out tokens · 158968 ms · 2026-07-31T23:36:35.805968+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Oxygen (O2) detection is commonly carried out via either fluorescence-based optical sensors or chemoresistive sensors. Each approach has its own limitations. Optical sensors require the molecular design and synthesis of specific organic fluorescent species which can be costly and less stable. Chemoresistive sensors, despite presenting advantages in using more cost-effective inorganic materials, are often limited by low sensitivities to O2 at ppm concentrations and by their inability to operate at room temperature. In this work, we demonstrate the detection of O2 at concentrations as low as a few tens of ppm at room temperature by using titanium dioxide (TiO2) mixed-phase nanoparticles as optical sensors. By simultaneously measuring the photoluminescence of nanoparticles in rutile and anatase phase, O2 detection was achieved in the concentration range of 30-500 ppm, with a response curve well-calibrated by a Langmuir function. Good response promptness and repeatability are also demonstrated. This approach to O2 optical sensing offers two intrinsic advantages over the most commonly used methodologies: (1) use of a cost-effective, easy-to-prepare and stable of the sensitive material compared to those typically employed in optical sensing, and (2) improved room-temperature detection efficiency in the low O2 concentration range, outperforming most commonly-used chemoresistive sensors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.27885 by A.Fioravanti, F.Borbone, M.Mazzocchi, R.Rega, S.Lettieri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: X-ray diffractograms for S500, S650 and S700 samples. The labels identify diffraction peaks corresponding to different crystalline planes of anatase (A) and rutile (R). Anatase Rutile 𝑆𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑎 (Å) 𝑐 (Å) % 𝑅𝐵 𝑎𝑣. 𝑠𝑖𝑧𝑒 (𝑛𝑚) 𝑎 (Å) 𝑐 (Å) % 𝑅𝐵 𝑎𝑣. 𝑠𝑖𝑧𝑒 (𝑛𝑚) S500 3.78455(6) 9.5025(5) 100 4.38 40 - - 0 - - S650 3.78414(6) 9.5109(2) 90 8.13 40 4.5933(2) 2.9580(2) 10 8.45 50 S700 3.78433(5) 9.5108(2) 90 7.45 50 4.5… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Semenza, Life with Oxygen, Science 318 (2007) 62–64

    G.L. Semenza, Life with Oxygen, Science 318 (2007) 62–64. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1147949

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1147949 2007

  2. [2]

    Bittig, A

    H.C. Bittig, A. Körtzinger, C. Neill, E. van Ooijen, J.N. Plant, J. Hahn, K.S. Johnson, B. Yang, S.R. Emerson, Oxygen Optode Sensors: Principle, Characterization, Calibration, and Application in the Ocean, Frontiers in Marine Science 4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00429

    arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    C. Li, S. Ding, L. Yang, Q. Zhu, M. Chen, D.C.W. Tsang, G. Cai, C. Feng, Y. Wang, C. Zhang, Planar optode: A two-dimensional imaging technique for studying spatial-temporal dynamics of solutes in sediment and soil, Earth-Science Reviews 197 (2019) 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102916

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    G. Liu, Y. Li, K. Migliaccio, T. Olczyk, A. Alva, Oxygen Amendment on Growth and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Flooded Italian Basil, International Journal of Vegetable Science 19 (2013) 217 –227. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2012.713451

    arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    Papkovsky, J.P

    D.B. Papkovsky, J.P. Kerry, Oxygen Sensor -Based Respirometry and the Landscape of Microbial Testing Methods as Applicable to Food and Beverage Matrices, Sensors 23 (2023) 4519. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23094519

    work page doi:10.3390/s23094519 2023

  6. [6]

    Trivellin, D

    N. Trivellin, D. Barbisan, D. Badocco, P. Pastore, G. Meneghesso, M. Meneghini, E. Zanoni, G. Belgioioso, A. Cenedese, Study and Development of a Fluorescence Based Sensor System for Monitoring Oxygen in Wine Production: The WOW Project, Sensors 18 (2018) 1130. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041130

    work page doi:10.3390/s18041130 2018

  7. [7]

    López -Ruiz, J

    N. López -Ruiz, J. López -Torres, M.Á.C. Rodríguez, I.P. de Vargas -Sansalvador, A. Martínez -Olmos, Wearable System for Monitoring of Oxygen Concentration in Breath Based on Optical Sensor, IEEE Sensors Journal 15 (2015) 4039–4045. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2410789

    arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    K. Iman, M. Shahid, Life sensors: current advances in oxygen sensing by lanthanide complexes, New J. Chem. 43 (2019) 1094–1116. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ04993A. 13

    work page doi:10.1039/c8nj04993a 2019

  9. [9]

    Wang, O.S

    X. Wang, O.S. Wolfbeis, Optical methods for sensing and imaging oxygen: materials, spectroscopies and applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 3666–3761. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00039K

    work page doi:10.1039/c4cs00039k 2014

  10. [10]

    Roussakis, Z

    E. Roussakis, Z. Li, A.J. Nichols, C.L. Evans, Oxygen-Sensing Methods in Biomedicine from the Macroscale to the Microscale, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 54 (2015) 8340 –8362. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201410646

    work page doi:10.1002/anie.201410646 2015

  11. [11]

    Papkovsky, R.I

    D.B. Papkovsky, R.I. Dmitriev, Biological detection by optical oxygen sensing, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 8700–8732. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60131E

    work page doi:10.1039/c3cs60131e 2013

  12. [12]

    Ward, Oxygen sensors in context, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1777 (2008) 1–14

    J.P.T. Ward, Oxygen sensors in context, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1777 (2008) 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.10.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2007.10.010 2008

  13. [13]

    Mendybaev, J.R

    R.A. Mendybaev, J.R. Beckett, E. Stolper, L. Grossman, Measurement of oxygen fugacities under reducing conditions: non -Nernstian behavior of Y2O3 -doped zirconia oxygen sensors, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 62 (1998) 3131–3139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00212-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0016-7037(98)00212-9 1998

  14. [14]

    Koshiba, Y

    Y. Koshiba, Y. Nakamura, D. Ito, T. Yokoyama, S. Okazaki, H. Nakagawa, T. Arai, Development of a durable fiber-optic oxygen sensor for harsh underground environments, Talanta 82 (2010) 1495 –1499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.07.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2010.07.027 2010

  15. [15]

    Llobet, E.H

    E. Llobet, E.H. Espinosa, E. Sotter, R. Ionescu, X. Vilanova, J. Torres, A. Felten, J.J. Pireaux, X. Ke, G. Van Tendeloo, F. Renaux, Y. Paint, M. Hecq, C. Bittencourt, Carbon nanotube–TiO2 hybrid films for detecting traces of O2, Nanotechnology 19 (2008) 375501. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/37/375501

    work page doi:10.1088/0957-4484/19/37/375501 2008

  16. [16]

    R. Sha, A. Basak, P.C. Maity, S. Badhulika, ZnO nano -structured based devices for chemical and optical sensing applications, Sensors and Actuators Reports 4 (2022) 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2022.100098

    arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Maruthupandy, Y

    M. Maruthupandy, Y. Zuo, J. -S. Chen, J.-M. Song, H.-L. Niu, C.-J. Mao, S.-Y. Zhang, Y.-H. Shen, Synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO and ZnO NPs) via biological template and their optical sensor applications, Applied Surface Science 397 (2017) 167 –174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.118

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.11.118 2017

  18. [18]

    S.M. Ng, M. Koneswaran, R. Narayanaswamy, A review on fluorescent inorganic nanoparticles for optical sensing applications, RSC Adv. 6 (2016) 21624–21661. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA24987B

    work page doi:10.1039/c5ra24987b 2016

  19. [19]

    Coscia, G

    U. Coscia, G. Ambrosone, S. Lettieri, P. Maddalena, V. Rigato, S. Restello, E. Bobeico, M. Tucci, Preparation of microcrystalline silicon –carbon films, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 87 (2005) 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.09.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2004.09.015 2005

  20. [20]

    Ricciardi, V

    C. Ricciardi, V. Ballarini, M. Galli, M. Liscidini, L.C. Andreani, M. Losurdo, G. Bruno, S. Lettieri, F. Gesuele, P. Maddalena, F. Giorgis, Amorphous Silicon Nitride: a suitable alloy for optical multilayered structures, Journal of Non -Crystalline Solids 3 52 (2006) 1294 –1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.10.056

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2005.10.056 2006

  21. [21]

    Likodimos, Photonic crystal -assisted visible light activated TiO2 photocatalysis, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 230 (2018) 269–303

    V. Likodimos, Photonic crystal -assisted visible light activated TiO2 photocatalysis, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 230 (2018) 269–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.039

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.02.039 2018

  22. [22]

    Raja -Mogan, B

    T. Raja -Mogan, B. Ohtani, E. Kowalska, Photonic Crystals for Plasmonic Photocatalysis, Catalysts 10 (2020) 827. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10080827

    work page doi:10.3390/catal10080827 2020

  23. [23]

    Faglia, C

    G. Faglia, C. Baratto, G. Sberveglieri, M. Zha, A. Zappettini, Adsorption effects of NO2 at ppm level on visible photoluminescence response of SnO2 nanobelts, Applied Physics Letters 86 (2005) 011923. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1849832

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1849832 2005

  24. [24]

    Setaro, A

    A. Setaro, A. Bismuto, S. Lettieri, P. Maddalena, E. Comini, S. Bianchi, C. Baratto, G. Sberveglieri, Optical sensing of NO 2 in tin oxide nanowires at sub -ppm level, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 130 (2008) 391–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2007.09.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.09.015 2008

  25. [25]

    Bismuto, S

    A. Bismuto, S. Lettieri, P. Maddalena, C. Baratto, E. Comini, G. Faglia, G. Sberveglieri, L. Zanotti, Room - temperature gas sensing based on visible photoluminescence properties of metal oxide nanobelts, J. Opt. A: Pure Appl. Opt. 8 (2006) S585. https://doi.org/10.1088/1464-4258/8/7/S45

    work page doi:10.1088/1464-4258/8/7/s45 2006

  26. [26]

    X. Liu, B. Du, Y. Sun, M. Yu, Y. Yin, W. Tang, C. Chen, L. Sun, B. Yang, W. Cao, M.N.R. Ashfold, Sensitive Room Temperature Photoluminescence-Based Sensing of H2 S with Novel CuO–ZnO Nanorods, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8 (2016) 16379–16385. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b02455

    work page doi:10.1021/acsami.6b02455 2016

  27. [27]

    Sanchez-Valencia, M

    J.R. Sanchez-Valencia, M. Alcaire, P. Romero -Gómez, M. Macias -Montero, F.J. Aparicio, A. Borras, A.R. Gonzalez-Elipe, A. Barranco, Oxygen Optical Sensing in Gas and Liquids with Nanostructured ZnO Thin 14 Films Based on Exciton Emission Detection, J. Phys. Chem. C 118 (2014) 9852 –9859. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5026027

    work page doi:10.1021/jp5026027 2014

  28. [28]

    Valerini, A

    D. Valerini, A. Cretì, A.P. Caricato, M. Lomascolo, R. Rella, M. Martino, Optical gas sensing through nanostructured ZnO films with different morphologies, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 145 (2010) 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2009.11.064

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2009.11.064 2010

  29. [29]

    Mercado, Z

    C. Mercado, Z. Seeley, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, J.L. McHale, Photoluminescence of Dense Nanocrystalline Titanium Dioxide Thin Films: Effect of Doping and Thickness and Relation to Gas Sensing, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 3 (2011) 2281–2288. https://doi.org/10.1021/am2006433

    work page doi:10.1021/am2006433 2011

  30. [30]

    Pallotti, L

    D.K. Pallotti, L. Passoni, F. Gesuele, P. Maddalena, F. Di Fonzo, S. Lettieri, Giant O 2 -Induced Photoluminescence Modulation in Hierarchical Titanium Dioxide Nanostructures, ACS Sens. 2 (2017) 61–

    2017

  31. [31]

    Kiisk, M

    V. Kiisk, M. Novotný, M. Kodu, S. Pikker, T. Avarmaa, J. Remsa, J. Lančok, M. Vrňata, R. Jaaniso, Pulsed laser annealed rare earth doped TiO2 thin films for luminescence and sensing applications, Applied Surface Science 637 (2023) 157884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157884

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Kiisk, K

    V. Kiisk, K. Akulitš, M. Kodu, T. Avarmaa, H. Mändar, J. Kozlova, M. Eltermann, L. Puust, R. Jaaniso, Oxygen-Sensitive Photoluminescence of Rare Earth Ions in TiO 2 Thin Films, J. Phys. Chem. C 123 (2019) 17908–17914. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04588

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04588 2019

  33. [33]

    Ab Kadir, R.A

    R. Ab Kadir, R.A. Rani, M.M.Y.A. Alsaif, J.Z. Ou, W. Wlodarski, A.P. O’Mullane, K. Kalantar-zadeh, Optical Gas Sensing Properties of Nanoporous Nb2O5 Films, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7 (2015) 4751 –4758. https://doi.org/10.1021/am508463g

    work page doi:10.1021/am508463g 2015

  34. [34]

    Marantos, V

    O. Marantos, V. Binas, M. Moschogiannaki, E. Gagaoudakis, G. Kiriakidis, A. Klini, Titanate -PMMA composites in photoluminescence based oxygen sensing, Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 133 (2021) 105942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2021.105942

    arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Fioravanti, S

    A. Fioravanti, S. Morandi, A.R. Pedrazzo, C. Cecone, M. Manzoli, M. Zanetti, P. Bracco, M. Mazzocchi, S. Lettieri, P. Marani, M.C. Carotta, Investigation of the key parameters for gas sensing through comparison of electrospun and sol -gel semiconducting oxi des, Ceramics International 48 (2022) 20948 –20960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.087

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.04.087 2022

  36. [36]

    Fioravanti, P

    A. Fioravanti, P. Marani, S. Morandi, S. Lettieri, M. Mazzocchi, M. Sacerdoti, M.C. Carotta, Growth Mechanisms of ZnO Micro -Nanomorphologies and Their Role in Enhancing Gas Sensing Properties, Sensors 21 (2021) 1331. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21041331

    work page doi:10.3390/s21041331 2021

  37. [37]

    Wiles, R.A

    D.B. Wiles, R.A. Young, A new computer program for Rietveld analysis of X -ray powder diffraction patterns, J Appl Cryst 14 (1981) 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889881008996

    work page doi:10.1107/s0021889881008996 1981

  38. [38]

    Suryanarayana, M.G

    C. Suryanarayana, M.G. Norton, X -Ray Diffraction, Springer US, Boston, MA, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0148-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0148-4 1998

  39. [39]

    Pallotti, E

    D. Pallotti, E. Orabona, S. Amoruso, P. Maddalena, S. Lettieri, Modulation of mixed -phase titania photoluminescence by oxygen adsorption, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 (2014) 031903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4891038

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4891038 2014

  40. [40]

    Pallotti, L

    D.K. Pallotti, L. Passoni, P. Maddalena, F. Di Fonzo, S. Lettieri, Photoluminescence Mechanisms in Anatase and Rutile TiO2, J. Phys. Chem. C 121 (2017) 9011–9021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00321

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b00321 2017

  41. [41]

    Lettieri, D.K

    S. Lettieri, D.K. Pallotti, F. Gesuele, P. Maddalena, Unconventional ratiometric-enhanced optical sensing of oxygen by mixed-phase TiO2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109 (2016) 031905. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4959263

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4959263 2016

  42. [42]

    Trani, M

    F. Trani, M. Causà, S. Lettieri, A. Setaro, D. Ninno, V. Barone, P. Maddalena, Role of surface oxygen vacancies in photoluminescence of tin dioxide nanobelts, Microelectronics Journal 40 (2009) 236 –238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2008.07.060

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mejo.2008.07.060 2009

  43. [43]

    Ambrosone, U

    G. Ambrosone, U. Coscia, S. Lettieri, P. Maddalena, C. Privato, S. Ferrero, Hydrogenated amorphous silicon carbon alloys for solar cells, Thin Solid Films 403 –404 (2002) 349 –353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01646-7

    work page doi:10.1016/s0040-6090(01)01646-7 2002

  44. [44]

    Barsan, M

    N. Barsan, M. Schweizer -Berberich, W. Göpel†, Fundamental and practical aspects in the design of nanoscaled SnO 2 gas sensors: a status report, Fresenius’ Journal of Analytical Chemistry 365 (1999) 287–

    1999

  45. [45]

    Zhang, C

    J. Zhang, C. Zhao, P.A. Hu, Y.Q. Fu, Z. Wang, W. Cao, B. Yang, F. Placido, A UV light enhanced TiO2/graphene device for oxygen sensing at room temperature, RSC Adv. 3 (2013) 22185. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra43480j

    work page doi:10.1039/c3ra43480j 2013

  46. [46]

    Xiong, W

    Y. Xiong, W. Lu, D. Ding, L. Zhu, X. Li, C. Ling, Q. Xue, Enhanced Room Temperature Oxygen Sensing Properties of LaOCl –SnO2 Hollow Spheres by UV Light Illumination, ACS Sens. 2 (2017) 679 –686. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.7b00129

    work page doi:10.1021/acssensors.7b00129 2017

  47. [47]

    Jyothilal, G

    H. Jyothilal, G. Shukla, S. Walia, B. S. P., S. Angappane, UV assisted room temperature oxygen sensors using titanium dioxide nanostructures, Materials Research Bulletin 140 (2021) 111324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111324

    arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Ahmed, N

    F. Ahmed, N. Arshi, M.S. Anwar, R. Danish, B.H. Koo, Mn -doped ZnO nanorod gas sensor for oxygen detection, Current Applied Physics 13 (2013) S64–S68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2012.12.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cap.2012.12.029 2013

  49. [49]

    Bae, H.H

    J.K. Bae, H.H. Cho, H. Shin, Y. Kim, H. Ko, S.J. Lee, D.D. Megersa, G.T. Gudena, S. Chae, I.S. Cho, H.K. Yu, One-step synthesis of Bi2O2Se microstructures for trace oxygen gas sensor application, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 394 (2023) 134398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2023.134398

    arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Sotter, X

    E. Sotter, X. Vilanova, E. Llobet, A. Vasiliev, X. Correig, Thick film titania sensors for detecting traces of oxygen, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 127 (2007) 567 –579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2007.05.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.05.010 2007

  51. [51]

    Z. Han, J. Wang, L. Liao, H. Pan, S. Shen, J. Chen, Phosphorus doped TiO2 as oxygen sensor with low operating temperature and sensing mechanism, Applied Surface Science 273 (2013) 349 –356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.041 2013

  52. [52]

    Oztel, S

    S. Oztel, S. Kaya, E. Budak, E. Yilmaz, Influences of platinum doping concentrations and operation temperatures on oxygen sensitivity of Pt/SnO2/Pt resistive gas sensors, J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 30 (2019) 14813–14821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01854-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s10854-019-01854-4 2019

  53. [53]

    Tonezzer, R.G

    M. Tonezzer, R.G. Lacerda, Integrated zinc oxide nanowires/carbon microfiber gas sensors, Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 150 (2010) 517–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2010.09.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.snb.2010.09.003 2010

  54. [54]

    Mokrushin, T.L

    A.S. Mokrushin, T.L. Simonenko, N.P. Simonenko, P.Yu. Gorobtsov, N.C. Kadyrov, E.P. Simonenko, V.G. Sevastyanov, N.T. Kuznetsov, Chemoresistive gas-sensing properties of highly dispersed Nb2O5 obtained by programmable precipitation, Journal of Alloys and C ompounds 868 (2021) 159090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.159090

    arXiv 2021

  55. [68]

    https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.6b00432

    work page doi:10.1021/acssensors.6b00432

  56. [304]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s002160051490. 15

    work page doi:10.1007/s002160051490