Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Ligand distortions seed a tiny Cr charge imbalance that dynamical correlations amplify into the metal-insulator transition of altermagnet CsCr2S2O.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 19:58 UTC pith:WDWXICUN

load-bearing objection Clean structure-controlled DMFT story that isolates S-distortion seeds and correlation amplification of charge order in CsCr2S2O; the MIT itself only appears at very high U, so the central claim is regime-dependent. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28029 v1 pith:WDWXICUN submitted 2026-07-30 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Orbital-Selective Mott Transition and Correlation-Amplified Charge Ordering in the Altermagnet CsCr₂S₂O

Xiuhua Chen , Yilin Wang This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismorbital-selective Mott transitioncharge orderingDFT+DMFTVerwey transitionligand engineeringCsCr2S2Ometal-insulator transition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

CsCr2S2O is an altermagnet that cools into an insulator via a Verwey-type transition with stripe charge order on Cr, yet the Cr atoms themselves barely move—only the surrounding ligands distort. The paper uses DFT+DMFT to show why that still produces a large charge split. An orbital-selective Mott transition leaves only the Cr dyz orbital metallic at low energy. Sulfur displacements create a minute charge asymmetry between the two Cr sites through dyz–S-p hybridization; many-body correlations then amplify that seed into a large occupancy difference and unequal local spin polarizations, opening the charge gap. Replacing S with Te weakens the correlations and is predicted to keep the system metallic. The result matters because it shows how ligand chemistry and dynamical correlations together decide whether an altermagnet stays metallic—the regime wanted for spintronic devices.

Core claim

S-site distortions alone produce only a tiny Cr charge asymmetry via Cr-dyz–S-p hybridization; dynamical electronic correlations amplify that seed into a large dyz occupancy difference between Cr1 and Cr2 and a substantial differentiation of local spin polarizations in the altermagnetic state, which opens the charge gap and drives the Verwey-type metal-to-insulator transition. Te substitution weakens the correlations and suppresses the transition.

What carries the argument

Correlation amplification of a ligand-seeded dyz charge asymmetry after an orbital-selective Mott transition: dynamical mean-field correlations turn a small hybridization-induced occupancy difference into a large site-dependent charge and spin polarization that opens the gap.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism requires that single-site DFT+DMFT with a large static Hubbard U (the gap opens only near U = 12 eV) correctly captures how correlations amplify the charge order.

What would settle it

Synthesize and measure CsCr2Te2O (or a closely related Te analogue): if it shows the same Verwey-type MIT and large Cr charge disproportionation as the sulfide, the predicted correlation-weakening and MIT suppression are wrong.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • Ligand choice (S vs Te) can switch the low-temperature state between insulating charge-ordered and metallic altermagnetic.
  • Static mean-field treatments underestimate the charge disproportionation; dynamical correlations are required to match the observed order.
  • High-throughput DFT screening of altermagnets will miss MIT pathways controlled by ligand-driven correlation amplification.
  • Preserving metallic altermagnetism for devices favors more extended ligands that screen local Coulomb interactions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar ligand-seeded, correlation-amplified charge order may appear in other ACr2X2O or AV2X2O family members whenever a single orbital remains metallic after orbital-selective Mott physics.
  • Pressure or chemical substitution that tunes the Cr–ligand hybridization strength should continuously suppress the charge gap without destroying the altermagnetic order.
  • ARPES or resonant X-ray scattering that resolves site-dependent dyz weight and spin polarization on Cr1 versus Cr2 would directly test the amplification picture.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies DFT+DMFT to the newly synthesized altermagnet CsCr2S2O to explain its Verwey-type metal–insulator transition. Controlled comparisons of four structures (S-HT, S-LT, S-LT* with S undistorted, and a hypothetical Te-LT) show that an orbital-selective Mott transition leaves a correlated metallic Cr-dyz channel, that S-site distortions seed only a tiny Cr charge asymmetry (Δn≈0.03 in DFT) via Cr-dyz–S-p hybridization, and that dynamical correlations amplify this into a large dyz occupancy split (~0.46 e) and local spin-polarization difference (~0.84 μB) that opens a charge gap in the altermagnetic state. Substituting Te is predicted to weaken correlations and suppress the MIT. The central claim is therefore a correlation-amplified feedback loop between ligand instability and electronic symmetry breaking.

Significance. If the mechanism holds, the work supplies a concrete many-body route from ligand-only distortions to Verwey-type charge order in an altermagnet, and a falsifiable materials prediction (Te substitution restores a metallic AM state). The structure-controlled isolation of the S channel (S-LT vs S-LT*) and the explicit hybridization-function comparison are clean and useful for the community. The emphasis on ligand engineering as a design knob for metallic altermagnetism is timely and goes beyond standard DFT high-throughput screening. Strengths include the transparent U scans (Fig. 3–4), tabulated occupancies (Tables I–II), and a clear experimental contact point (charge disproportionation and MIT).

major comments (3)
  1. [Results (Figs. 3–4, U scans; Table I)] Results, Figs. 3–4 and accompanying text: the global charge gap and the large correlation-amplified Δn open only at U=12 eV (system still metallic / brink at U=8 eV, with total Δn only ~0.2 e). The central claim that dynamical correlations drive the experimental Verwey-type MIT is therefore regime-dependent on a very large static Hubbard U for Cr 3d. No constrained-RPA, linear-response, or spectroscopic estimate of U (or of the double-counting correction) in this ligand environment is provided. The authors should either justify U≈12 eV as physically realistic for CsCr2S2O or demonstrate that a gap and experimental-scale charge order survive at more conventional Cr 3d values (or with a frequency-dependent interaction), and discuss how the conclusion changes if realistic U lies nearer 5–8 eV.
  2. [Results (charge-order amplification; Table II)] Results, PM/AM spectral functions and Table II: single-site DMFT omits nonlocal charge fluctuations and intersite correlations that are often essential once a charge-order seed is present (as in classic Verwey physics). The amplification narrative and the spin-polarization differentiation that “ultimately driv[e] the MIT” could be assisted or suppressed by such terms. A short discussion of this limitation, and ideally a check with DFT+U+V, cluster DMFT, or a Landau free-energy estimate of the nonlocal contribution, is needed before the mechanism can be taken as established.
  3. [Results (Te-LT; Figs. 2f, 3c,f, 4d)] Results, Te-LT construction: the claim that Te substitution “fails to induce an MIT due to weaker electron correlations” rests on a hypothetical Te-LT structure obtained by scaling S-LT relative displacements to Te lattice constants. Real CsCr2Te2O may relax differently (or not distort at all). The prediction should be clearly labeled as conditional on that structural proxy, and ideally supplemented by a fully relaxed Te structure or a statement of what experimental signature would falsify the scenario.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table I and Results text] Table I / experimental comparison: experiment quotes Cr2.22+ / Cr2.81+ (Δ≈0.59); DMFT gives total Δn≈0.32 (and dyz Δn≈0.46). A brief quantitative reconciliation (formal valence vs. projected 3d occupancy, ligand charge) would help the reader.
  2. [Methods / SM reference] Computational details are deferred to Supplementary Materials that are not fully specified in the main text (projector choice, double-counting scheme, impurity solver, temperature, nominal occupancy). A short methods paragraph in the main text is needed for reproducibility.
  3. [Fig. 2] Fig. 2(g,h): the hybridization-function panels are central to the amplification story; axis labels and which curves correspond to Cr1 vs Cr2 / S-LT vs Te-LT should be made unambiguous in the caption.
  4. [throughout] Typographical / notation: “insufficient”, “efficacy”, “effect” (ligature artifacts); “a pronounced correlation differentiation” (grammar); consistent use of S-LT* vs S-LT∗.
  5. [Results paragraph on DFT+U] The DFT+U remark (MIT at U=2.5 eV but Δn only ~0.08) is important; citing the precise functional/projector used in Ref. [69] would sharpen the contrast with DMFT.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: correlation amplification is obtained from controlled DFT vs DFT+DMFT comparisons and U-scans on fixed experimental/hypothetical structures, benchmarked externally.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: (i) experimental S-LT structure supplies ligand displacements; (ii) plain DFT on that structure yields only a tiny Cr occupancy difference (~0.03 e); (iii) single-site DFT+DMFT on the same structures produces an orbital-selective Mott state and a large dyz occupancy split that grows with U; (iv) the AM-state spin-polarization differentiation and gap opening appear only at the high-U end of the scan; (v) a constructed Te-LT structure is predicted to remain metallic. None of these steps defines the output into the input. U and JH are free parameters that are scanned rather than fitted to force the experimental charge numbers; the experimental MIT and charge disproportionation serve as external benchmarks, not as fitted targets renamed as predictions. There is no self-citation uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled from prior author work, and no renaming of a known empirical pattern. Parameter-regime dependence of the gap (MIT only near U=12 eV) is a robustness/correctness concern, not circularity by construction. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on standard strongly correlated electron methodology (DFT+single-site DMFT), hand-chosen interaction parameters, and several controlled but hypothetical crystal structures. No new particles or forces are invented; the load-bearing extras are U/JH and the assumption that single-site DMFT plus the constructed Te-LT geometry suffice.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U on Cr 3d = 8–12 eV (gap at 12 eV)
    Scanned; MIT and large charge order appear robustly only near U=12 eV (brink at 8 eV). Value is large compared with typical Cr 3d estimates and directly controls whether the gap opens.
  • Hund's coupling JH = 1 eV
    Fixed at 1 eV to obtain the orbital-selective Mott pattern that isolates metallic dyz; weaker JH=0.5 eV leaves a different orbital hierarchy.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Single-site DMFT captures the charge-order amplification and gap physics without essential nonlocal correlations or cluster effects.
    All spectral functions, occupancies, and hybridization plots are single-impurity DMFT; stripe charge order can in principle involve intersite correlations.
  • ad hoc to paper The constructed Te-LT structure (S-LT relative displacements scaled to Te lattice constants) is a faithful proxy for real CsCr2Te2O distortions.
    Used to predict absence of MIT; not an experimental low-T structure.
  • ad hoc to paper S-LT* (S undistorted, Cs/O distortions kept) cleanly separates ligand channels.
    Hypothetical structure used to show Cs/O distortions alone do not seed or amplify charge order.
  • domain assumption Standard DFT band structure and Cr 3d / ligand-p hybridization provide a valid non-interacting bath for DMFT.
    Usual DFT+DMFT starting point; orbital characters in Fig. 1 underpin the dyz–S-p seed mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 18294 in / 3048 out tokens · 70993 ms · 2026-07-31T19:58:39.818268+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Orbital-Selective Mott Transition and Correlation-Amplified Charge Ordering in the Altermagnet CsCr$_2$S$_2$O." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WDWXICUN

@misc{pith2026260728029,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Orbital-Selective Mott Transition and Correlation-Amplified Charge Ordering in the Altermagnet CsCr$_2$S$_2$O},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WDWXICUN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28029}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Altermagnet CsCr$_2$S$_2$O undergoes a Verwey-type metal-to-insulator transition (MIT) driven by lattice distortion and a stripe charge order on the Cr sublattice, reminiscent of the physics in Fe$_3$O$_4$. However, atomic distortions occur exclusively at the ligand sites rather than the Cr sites. What drives such a pronounced charge imbalance between Cr sites thus remains a mystery. Utilizing DFT+DMFT calculations, we identify an orbital-selective Mott transition, which leaves the correlated metallic $d_{yz}$ orbital governing the low-energy physics. We demonstrate that S-site distortions trigger an initial, tiny charge asymmetry between Cr sites via Cr-$d_{yz}$ and S-$p$ orbital hybridization. Crucially, this asymmetry is significantly amplified by dynamical electronic correlations, resulting in a large discrepancy in both the charge and electron correlations of the Cr-$d_{yz}$ orbital between distinct Cr sites. This further induces a substantial differentiation in local spin polarizations in the altermagnetic state, ultimately driving the MIT. In contrast, we predict that replacing S with Te weakens this correlation-amplification effect and fails to induce an MIT due to weaker electron correlations. Our findings demonstrate that many-body effects can drastically amplify ligand instabilities to reshape the electronic structure of altermagnets, highlighting that ligand engineering is of paramount importance for realizing robust metallic altermagnetism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28029 by Xiuhua Chen, Yilin Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 5 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum- dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO 2: a density functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 13294 (2016)

    2016

  2. [2]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 88, 123702 (2019) . 6

    2019

  3. [3]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Na- ture Communications 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  4. [4]

    M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalog of c- paired spin-momentum locking in antiferromagnetic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021083 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous hall antiferromagnets, Na- ture Reviews Materials 7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Jungwirth, R

    T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, J. Sinova, and L. Sme- jkal, Altermagnets and beyond: Nodal magnetically- ordered phases (2024), arXiv:2409.10034 [cond-mat.mtrl- sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Materials Today Physics 32, 100991 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. Šmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in mag- netism and spintronics, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  12. [12]

    Q. Liu, X. Dai, and S. Blügel, Different facets of uncon- ventional magnetism, Nature Physics 21, 329 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    H. Zhu, J. Li, X. Chen, Y. Yu, and Q. Liu, Magnetic ge- ometry induced quantum geometry and nonlinear trans- ports, Nature Communications 16, 4882 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. González-Hernández, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    Zhang, C

    R.-W. Zhang, C. Cui, R. Li, J. Duan, L. Li, Z.-M. Yu, and Y. Yao, Predictable gate-field control of spin in alter- magnets with spin-layer coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 056401 (2024)

    2024

  17. [17]

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, Y. Zhou, S. Liang, C. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Chen, L. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Electrical 180° switching of néel vec- tor in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Science Advances 10, eadn0479 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the alter- magnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature 638, 645 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Bai, J. Dai, L. Han, C. Chen, S. Liang, Y. Cao, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, W. Zhu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Electrical manipulation of spin splitting torque in altermagnetic RuO 2, Nature Communications 16, 5646 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. Žutić, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    M. Gu, Y. Liu, H. Zhu, K. Yananose, X. Chen, Y. Hu, A. Stroppa, and Q. Liu, Ferroelectric switchable alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106802 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    L. Yu, H. J. Zhao, L. Bellaiche, and Y. Ma, Electri- cally switchable nonrelativistic zeeman spin splittings in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 256704 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    J.-X. Hu, O. Matsyshyn, and J. C. W. Song, Nonlinear superconducting magnetoelectric effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 026001 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B 108, 184505 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Sumita, M

    S. Sumita, M. Naka, and H. Seo, Fulde-ferrell-larkin- ovchinnikov state induced by antiferromagnetic order in κ-type organic conductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043171 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Zhang, L.-H

    S.-B. Zhang, L.-H. Hu, and T. Neupert, Finite- momentum cooper pairing in proximitized altermagnets, Nature Communications 15, 1801 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermag- netic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106601 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite-momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060508 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    S. Hong, M. J. Park, and K.-M. Kim, Unconventional p-wave and finite-momentum superconductivity induced by altermagnetism through the formation of bogoliubov fermi surface, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054501 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Mukasa and Y

    K. Mukasa and Y. Masaki, Finite-momentum supercon- ductivity in two-dimensional altermagnets with a rashba- type spin–orbit coupling, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 94, 064705 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Luo, Z.-T

    X.-J. Luo, Z.-T. Sun, X. Feng, M. Tian, and K. T. Law, Hidden zeeman field in odd-parity magnets: An ideal platform for topological superconductivity (2026), arXiv:2603.15147 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    arXiv 2026

  32. [32]

    W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 294, 343 (1966)

    1966

  33. [33]

    Litvin and W

    D. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974)

    1974

  34. [34]

    P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021016 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representa- tion theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a complete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear mag- 7 nets dictated by spin space groups, Nature 640, 349 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    Luo, J.-X

    X.-J. Luo, J.-X. Hu, M.-L. Hu, and K. T. Law, Spin group symmetry criteria for odd-parity magnets (2026), arXiv:2510.05512 [cond-mat.other]

    arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Luo, J.-X

    X.-J. Luo, J.-X. Hu, M. Hu, and K. T. Law, Spin group symmetry criteria for unconventional magnetism (2026), arXiv:2603.07643 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Šmejkal, R

    L. Šmejkal, R. González-Hernández, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci- ence Advances 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  42. [42]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. Šmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. González-Hernández, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nature Elec- tronics 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  43. [43]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal thermal transport in altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Minár, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Ross- nagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtmüller, M. Kläui, G. Schönhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, G. Jakob, L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Ob- servation of time-reversal symmetry b...

    2024

  45. [45]

    Z. Lin, D. Chen, W. Lu, X. Liang, S. Feng, K. Yamagami, J. Osiecki, M. Leandersson, B. Thiagarajan, J. Liu, C. Felser, and J. Ma, Observation of giant spin splitting and d-wave spin texture in room temperature altermag- net RuO 2 (2024), arXiv:2402.04995 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Chen, Z.-A

    H. Chen, Z.-A. Wang, P. Qin, Z. Meng, X. Zhou, X. Wang, L. Liu, G. Zhao, Z. Duan, T. Zhang, J. Liu, D.-F. Shao, C. Jiang, and Z. Liu, Spin-splitting magne- toresistance in altermagnetic RuO 2 thin films, Advanced Materials 37, 2507764 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Wang, Z.-Y

    Y.-C. Wang, Z.-Y. Shen, C.-H. Lin, W.-C. Hsu, Y.-S. Chen, Y.-Y. Chin, A. K. Singh, W.-L. Lee, C.-T. Chen, S.-Y. Huang, and D. Qu, Absence of transport altermag- netic spin-splitting effect in RuO 2, Nano Letters 26, 2548 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, Y.-J. Sun, Y. Huang, X. Zheng, Y. Peng, L. He, S. Li, J. Luo, Z. Li, G. Chen, H. Li, H. Weng, and T. Qian, A metallic room-temperature d- wave altermagnet, Nature Physics 21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, X. Meng, C. Zhang, T. Okuda, K. Shimada, S. Cui, Y. Zhao, G.-H. Cao, S. Qiao, J. Liu, and C. Chen, Crystal-symmetry-paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate, Na- ture Physics 21, 760 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    C.-C. Liu, J. Li, J.-Y. Liu, J.-Y. Lu, H.-X. Li, Y. Liu, and G.-H. Cao, Physical properties and first-principles calculations of an altermagnet candidate Cs1−δV2Te2O, Phys. Rev. B 112, 224439 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Z. Wang, S. Yu, X. Cheng, X. Xiao, W. Ma, F. Quan, H. Song, K. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, W. Liu, P. Ya- dav, X. Shi, Z. Wang, Q. Niu, Y. Gao, B. Xiang, J. Liu, Z. Wang, and X. Chen, Atomic-scale spin sensing of a 2D d-wave altermagnet via helical tunneling (2025), arXiv:2512.23290 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    G. Yang, C. Li, C. Wang, X. Zhao, Y. Wan, H. Gui, G. Zeng, S. Cao, C. Hu, D. Chen, Y. Liu, Y. Song, F. Liu, L.-H. Hu, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, Visualiz- ing spin-polarization of an altermagnet KV 2Se2O via spin-selective tunneling (2026), arXiv:2603.21969 [cond- mat.mtrl-sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    D. Fu, L. Yang, Y. Shen, K. Xiao, Y. Wang, W. Jiang, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, Q.-K. Xue, and W. Li, Atomic- scale visualization of d-wave altermagnetism (2026), arXiv:2512.24114 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  54. [54]

    Guo, Robust d-wave altermagnetism in XCr 2Y2O (x=k, rb, cs; y=s, se, t) family, Frontiers of Physics https://doi.org/10.15302/frontphys.2026.075204 (2026)

    S.-D. Guo, Robust d-wave altermagnetism in XCr 2Y2O (x=k, rb, cs; y=s, se, t) family, Frontiers of Physics https://doi.org/10.15302/frontphys.2026.075204 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  55. [55]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in g-wave altermagnet CrSb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Zeng, M.-Y

    M. Zeng, M.-Y. Zhu, Y.-P. Zhu, X.-R. Liu, X.-M. Ma, Y.- J. Hao, P. Liu, G. Qu, Y. Yang, Z. Jiang, K. Yamagami, M. Arita, X. Zhang, T.-H. Shao, Y. Dai, K. Shimada, Z. Liu, M. Ye, Y. Huang, Q. Liu, and C. Liu, Observation of spin splitting in room-temperature metallic antiferro- magnet CrSb, Advanced Science 11, 2406529 (2024)

    2024

  57. [57]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. Šmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kläui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in CrSb thin films, Nature Communications 15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, Three- dimensional mapping of the altermagnetic spin splitting in CrSb, Nature Communications 16, 1442 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    W. Lu, S. Feng, Y. Wang, D. Chen, Z. Lin, X. Liang, S. Liu, W. Feng, K. Yamagami, J. Liu, C. Felser, Q. Wu, and J. Ma, Signature of topological surface bands in al- termagnetic weyl semimetal CrSb, Nano Letters 25, 7343 (2025)

    2025

  60. [60]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal, C.-J. Kang, and C. Kim, Broken kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036702 (2024)

    2024

  61. [61]

    Krempaský, L

    J. Krempaský, L. Šmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhlířová, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. González-Hernández, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlová, Z. Šobáň, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Minár, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Altermagnetic lifting of kra...

    2024

  62. [62]

    Osumi, S

    T. Osumi, S. Souma, T. Aoyama, K. Yamauchi, A. Honma, K. Nakayama, T. Takahashi, K. Ohgushi, and T. Sato, Observation of a giant band splitting in al- termagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115102 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    Hajlaoui, S

    M. Hajlaoui, S. Wilfred D’Souza, L. Šmejkal, D. Krieg- 8 ner, G. Krizman, T. Zakusylo, N. Olszowska, O. Caha, J. Michalička, J. Sánchez-Barriga, A. Marmodoro, K. Výborný, A. Ernst, M. Cinchetti, J. Minar, T. Jung- wirth, and G. Springholz, Temperature dependence of relativistic valence band splitting induced by an al- termagnetic phase transition, Advance...

    2024

  64. [64]

    Chilcote, A

    M. Chilcote, A. R. Mazza, Q. Lu, I. Gray, Q. Tian, Q. Deng, D. Moseley, A.-H. Chen, J. Lapano, J. S. Gard- ner, G. Eres, T. Z. Ward, E. Feng, H. Cao, V. Lauter, M. A. McGuire, R. Hermann, D. Parker, M.-G. Han, A. Kayani, G. Rimal, L. Wu, T. R. Charlton, R. G. Moore, and M. Brahlek, Stoichiometry-induced ferro- magnetism in altermagnetic candidate MnTe, Ad...

    2024

  65. [65]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi, J. Krempaský, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. Šmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, Nanoscale imaging and control of alter- magnetism in MnTe, Nature 636, ...

    2024

  66. [66]

    J. T. Sparks and T. Komoto, Neutron diffraction study of nis, Journal of Applied Physics 34, 1191 (1963)

    1963

  67. [67]

    Mandal, A

    A. Mandal, A. Das, and B. R. K. Nanda, Deterministic role of chemical bonding in the formation of altermag- netism: Reflection from the correlated electron system nis, Phys. Rev. B 112, 014420 (2025)

    2025

  68. [68]

    Guowei, C

    Y. Guowei, C. Ruihan, L. Changchao, L. Jing, P. Ze, H. Teng, X. Pengyue, D. Liwei, Z. Naifu, T. Yu, Z. Hao, Z. Weifan, X. Yifu, Z. Xinying, M. Xin, W. Xiaoping, C. Shengtao, S. Zhe, L. Zhengtai, Y. Mao, C. Chao, S. Ming, H. Lunhui, L. Qihang, Q. Shan, C. Guanghan, S. Yu, and L. Yang, Observation of hidden altermag- netism in cs 1−δv2te2o (2025), arXiv:251...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Liu, C.-C

    Y. Liu, C.-C. Xu, J.-K. Bao, B.-J. Lv, H. Li, J. Li, Y.- Q. Lin, H.-X. Li, Y.-M. Lu, X.-Y. Zhao, W.-Z. Yang, Z.-Y. Zhang, X.-Y. Chen, W.-H. Jiao, J.-Y. Liu, B.- R. Zhu, and G.-H. Cao, Altermagnetism and room- temperature metal-to-insulator transition in CsCr 2S2O (2026), arXiv:2604.02114 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    E. J. W. VER WEY, Electronic conduction of magnetite (fe3o4) and its transition point at low temperatures, Na- ture 144, 327 (1939)

    1939

  71. [71]

    M. S. Senn, J. P. Wright, and J. P. Attfield, Charge or- der and three-site distortions in the verwey structure of magnetite, Nature 481, 173 (2012)

    2012

  72. [72]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  73. [73]

    A. I. Lichtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, and G. Kotliar, Finite-temperature magnetism of transition metals: An ab initio dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067205 (2001)

    2001

  74. [74]

    Kotliar, S

    G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, Electronic struc- ture calculations with dynamical mean-field theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 865 (2006)

    2006

  75. [75]

    Haule, C.-H

    K. Haule, C.-H. Yee, and K. Kim, Dynamical mean- field theory within the full-potential methods: Electronic structure of CeIrIn 5, CeCoIn 5, and CeRhIn 5, Phys. Rev. B 81, 195107 (2010)

    2010

  76. [76]

    The Supplementary Materials include Refs

    See Supporting Information at [url] for computational details and more results. The Supplementary Materials include Refs