Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Formulating counterdiabatic driving in a free dressed frame yields lab-only corrections that ordinary adiabatic-frame CD cannot implement.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 09:07 UTC pith:GST74C7K

load-bearing objection Clean lab-frame dressed CD that actually produces implementable corrections under native-control constraints, with analytical families in two of three examples. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28383 v1 pith:GST74C7K submitted 2026-07-30 quant-ph

Counterdiabatic Driving under Variational Frame Dressing

Boxi Li , Franco Nori , Felix Motzoi This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords counterdiabatic drivingdressed framesshortcuts to adiabaticityquantum controlvariational gauge potentialholonomic gatesspectator errors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Counterdiabatic driving can speed up adiabatic quantum protocols, but the exact correction often demands operators the lab does not have. This paper shows how to pose the same problem in a variational dressed frame: an unconstrained virtual generator reshapes the effective adiabatic Hamiltonian while the physical correction is forced to stay inside the native controls. The result is a laboratory-frame commutator equation that can be solved without building instantaneous eigenstates or frame unitaries, and the extra frame freedom exposes implementable solutions invisible in the conventional adiabatic frame. Three examples make the point concrete—single-quadrature protection of many spectator qubits, X-only acceleration of Bell-state preparation with fixed ZZ coupling, and a fast holonomic gate whose corrections never leave the native tripod couplings. If the construction works more broadly, adiabatic speedups become usable on hardware whose control graphs are severely limited.

Core claim

Counterdiabatic driving formulated in a variational dressed frame produces the laboratory commutator condition [∂t H1 + i[AD + Hc, H1], H1] = 0, with H1 = H0 − AD. Jointly solving for the free virtual generator AD and the constrained physical correction Hc yields implementable finite-time adiabatic protocols that are inaccessible when the problem is posed only in the conventional adiabatic frame, and without constructing instantaneous eigenstates or the adiabatic and dressed unitaries.

What carries the argument

The laboratory-frame dressed commutator equation [G2, H1] = 0 (H1 = H0 − AD). The free generator AD deforms the effective adiabatic problem so that an Hc restricted to native lab operators can cancel diabatic transitions; the residual Sop = ∫ ‖[G2, H1]‖² dt is the practical objective when the equation is solved variationally.

Load-bearing premise

That a finite, symmetry-compatible set of virtual operators exists for the dressed generator so the residual can be driven near zero while the physical correction stays inside the real lab controls and meets the endpoint conditions.

What would settle it

For the multi-spectator chain with distinct detunings, solve the shared-X boundary-value problem and check whether every spectator Bloch vector returns to the origin at final time while the target still executes a clean π pulse; if no such cx(t) exists (or the commutator residual cannot be driven to numerical zero), the claim fails for that instance.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A single shared X quadrature can suppress crosstalk on many detuned spectators without any Y control.
  • Bell-state preparation under fixed ZZ interaction admits exact X-only dressed-CD protocols once enough entangling phase has accumulated.
  • Holonomic gates on a degenerate dark manifold can be accelerated while keeping all corrections on the native star-graph couplings and retaining geometric robustness trends.
  • The same Hamiltonian-level equation can be paired with structured many-body operator ansätze without requiring full instantaneous diagonalization of H0.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dressed-frame freedom should map onto leakage-suppression problems in weakly nonlinear qubits where only a few microwave quadratures are available.
  • Because the loss is nonlinear in AD, optimizer cost and local minima will likely dominate scaling long before the formal equation fails.
  • Hidden low-dimensional algebras (as in the Ising-dimer reduction) may be discovered automatically by the variational solve even when they are not written down first.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a dressed-frame formulation of counterdiabatic (CD) driving in which an unconstrained virtual generator AD reshapes the effective Hamiltonian H1 = H0 − AD while the physical correction Hc is restricted to native laboratory controls. Transforming the dressed transitionless condition yields the laboratory-frame commutator equation [∂t H1 + i[AD + Hc, H1], H1] = 0, which can be solved without constructing instantaneous eigenstates or the adiabatic/dressed unitaries. The method is illustrated in three settings: exact X-only protection of multiple spectator qubits under a single shared quadrature, analytical and variational X-only acceleration of Bell-state preparation in a transverse-field Ising dimer (via reduction to a Landau–Zener problem with an explicit speed limit), and a variational native-control correction for a fast holonomic gate in a tripod system that preserves geometric robustness. Supplemental Material derives the lab-frame equations, gives closed-form single-spectator and LZ/Bell families, and details the multi-spectator BVP and tripod Fourier optimization.

Significance. Implementability is the central practical bottleneck for CD driving; the paper gives a clean, nonperturbative operator-level route that systematically exploits frame freedom rather than iterating superadiabatic expansions or relying on special Lie-algebra closures. The lab-frame commutator, the exact single-parameter X-only family (Eqs. 8–9), the explicit LZ/Bell analytical construction with regularity and speed-limit conditions, and the tripod native-graph solve are concrete, checkable contributions. Endpoint-matched deformation of the adiabatic path is a legitimate and useful degree of freedom for state preparation and holonomic gates. The work is a solid advance for quantum control and shortcuts to adiabaticity, with clear value for constrained hardware (single-quadrature drives, fixed entangling interactions, star-graph couplings).

major comments (2)
  1. [After Eq. (4); Abstract] Main text (paragraphs after Eq. 4 and the applications) should state more prominently what is already in Supp. I: the transitionless trajectory is that of H1 = H0 − AD, not of H0, with only the endpoint eigenspaces forced to coincide via AD(0) = AD(T) = 0 (and Hc endpoints). The abstract and early framing still read as if one follows the adiabatic trajectory of H0. For state transfer and holonomic gates this is the right goal, but the distinction is load-bearing for interpreting “CD” and for comparing to conventional AGP/CD; a short explicit statement in the main text (and one sentence in the abstract) would prevent misreading.
  2. [Single-quadrature multi-spectator protection; Supp. III.B] Multi-spectator section and Supp. III.B: the construction is cast as a well-posed 2n-state, one-control BVP and a numerical example with four spectators is shown. The manuscript does not discuss existence/uniqueness or failure modes when detunings are dense or n is large (e.g., whether a single cx(t) in a finite smooth basis can close all disks). A brief remark on when the BVP is expected to admit a regular solution, or a second numerical example with more crowded Δj, would strengthen the central “single-quadrature multi-spectator” claim without requiring a full scalability theory.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Several word-boundary glitches appear in the compiled text (e.g., “Acceleratingadiabaticprotocols”, “withoutconstructinginstantaneouseigenstates”, “substitute-Hamiltonianconstructions”). Please run a full proofread pass.
  2. [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 caption and panel labels are helpful; adding a one-line reminder that VD is virtual (not applied in the lab) would match the careful wording later in the text.
  3. [Bell-state preparation by dressed CD] In the Bell-state section, the entangling speed limit T_ent = π/(4|J|) and the reduced two-level bound are both important; a single sentence cross-referencing Supp. IV.B in the main text would help readers who do not immediately see the Φ+/Ψ+ reduction.
  4. [Fig. 4; Supp. V] Tripod fidelity definitions (FQ, L, and the composite F) live only in Supp. V; citing the formula used for Fig. 4 in the caption or a footnote would aid reproducibility.
  5. [Discussion; Supp. II.B] Discussion correctly flags many-body ansatz design as open. A pointer to how the present residual Sop differs in practice from conventional AGP least-squares (already in Supp. II.B) could be echoed in one sentence of the main Discussion for readers who skip the supplement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: dressed commutator is derived from frame unitaries; examples solve or minimize that independent residual under control constraints.

full rationale

The central laboratory-frame equation [∂t H1 + i[AD + Hc, H1], H1] = 0 with H1 = H0 − AD follows from two successive unitary frame changes and the transitionless commutator condition (Supp. I, Eqs. S1–S13); it is not defined in terms of the target fidelities. Analytical families (spectator X-only Eqs. 8–9; Bell/LZ inverse construction Supp. IV) choose admissible dressed trajectories and reconstruct Hc so the residual vanishes—standard inverse solution of the PDE, not a fitted input renamed as prediction. Variational examples minimize Sop = ∫ ‖[G2, H1]‖² then validate by Schrödinger propagation. θ_max calibration only sets the bare holonomic angle to Ry(π/2); it does not force the dressed residual or robustness curves. Prior self-citations (DRAG, dressed Λ constructions) supply context and related methods but are not load-bearing uniqueness theorems that forbid alternatives. The finite-ansatz expressivity premise is an existence assumption, not a circular reduction. Derivation chain is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The work rests on standard closed-system unitary control and the known CD/AGP commutator idea, extended by treating a virtual frame generator as free. No new physical particles or forces. Practical claims depend on ansatz expressivity, smooth pulse bases, and endpoint matching—not on fitted universal constants.

free parameters (5)
  • Fourier/sine mode coefficients for aµ(t), cν(t) = problem-dependent (e.g. 14–20 sine modes in tripod)
    Variational degrees of freedom minimized against Sop; number of modes (e.g. 14 or 20 for tripod) chosen by hand for each example.
  • Dressed Bloch path parameter α (single-spectator x(t)=α sin³(πt/T)) = set by ∫ cx dt = 0
    Fixed by zero-area condition on cx so total X-drive area is preserved; envelope shape chosen to match bare drive.
  • θ_max in tripod loop = initialized ~2.73
    Calibrated so bare holonomy matches Ry(π/2), then refined by short sweep; not predicted from first principles.
  • Bump-density ε in analytical LZ/Bell θ(λ) family = per-T choice inside admissible region
    Chosen so max|θ̇| stays below the regularity bound (e.g. ≲0.98×2|J|).
  • Operator ansatz sets {Vµ}, {Cν}
    Human-chosen bases (e.g. full two-level ops for AD vs X-only Hc; tripod virtual Yij plus native Xej). Completeness is assumed, not proved.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Closed-system Schrödinger evolution under a Hermitian time-dependent Hamiltonian; decoherence neglected in the protocol design.
    Standard for CD derivations; stated implicitly throughout and in examples’ unitary fidelity metrics.
  • standard math A smooth unitary frame transformation V generates the gauge term A = i(∂t V)V†, and transitionless driving in a frame is equivalent to the commutator [∂t H̃ + i[Hc̃, H̃], H̃] = 0.
    Used to derive Eqs. (2)–(4) and Supplemental §§I–II from first-frame and second-frame transformations.
  • domain assumption Native laboratory controls span only a stated subspace of operators (single X quadrature; Xs only; tripod star graph), while AD may use a larger virtual basis.
    Defines the implementability constraint in each application section.
  • ad hoc to paper Endpoint conditions AD(0)=AD(T)=Hc(0)=Hc(T)=0 (or equivalent) make initial/final target eigenspaces coincide with the reference problem.
    Imposed in variational implementation so dressed protocols match reference boundary eigenbranches; convenient but not the only possible gauge choice.
  • ad hoc to paper Minimizing Sop = ∫ ‖[G2,H1]‖² is the correct practical surrogate for transitionlessness when H1 depends on AD (as opposed to minimizing Tr G2²).
    Argued in Supplemental §II.B because diagonal parts of G2 become frame-dependent; central to claiming variational solutions are valid CD protocols.
invented entities (1)
  • Variational dressed-frame generator AD (unconstrained virtual AGP-like generator not applied in the lab) independent evidence
    purpose: Reshape H1 = H0 − AD so that some Hc inside the native control set satisfies the transitionless commutator.
    Methodological construct generalizing prior dressed-state and superadiabatic ideas; not a new physical field. Independent handle is whether residual and Schrödinger fidelity vanish under stated controls.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 22497 in / 3435 out tokens · 79519 ms · 2026-07-31T09:07:51.191571+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Counterdiabatic (CD) driving accelerates adiabatic protocols by prescribing auxiliary control fields, but often fails to map them to physically available operations. We derive a general formalism for such a mapping. We formulate CD driving in a variational dressed frame, where an unconstrained auxiliary generator reshapes the effective adiabatic problem while simultaneously forcing the applied correction to stay restricted to the native laboratory controls. This yields a laboratory-frame commutator equation that can be solved without constructing instantaneous eigenstates or the adiabatic and dressed-frame unitaries. The additional dressed-frame freedom reveals solutions that are inaccessible in the conventional adiabatic frame. We illustrate this mechanism in three settings: suppression of spectator errors in a multi-qubit chain driven by a single quadrature, an analytical acceleration of adiabatic Bell-state preparation with a fixed entangling interaction, and implementation of a fast adiabatic holonomic gate in a degenerate tripod manifold with correction pulses confined to the native couplings. Our results provide a systematic nonperturbative framework for constructing implementable counterdiabatic protocols beyond the conventional adiabatic frame.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28383 by Boxi Li, Felix Motzoi, Franco Nori.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Overview of the dressed CD protocol. (a) For [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a,b) Single-qubit dressed CD for a single spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Accelerated Bell-state preparation using an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Tripod holonomic gate under the native-control constraint. (a) Common rescaling of all tripod legs at fixed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The pulse cx(t) constructed in this way is then inserted back into the full two-qubit Hamiltonian H(t) = JZ1Z2 + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 3 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Albash and D

    T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum compu- tation, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 015002 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    This two- qubit setting is a standard entanglement testbed for Ising interactions [53] and can also be viewed as the small- est building block of larger transverse-field Ising anneal- 4 0 T Time t 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 ˆXs coefficients (a) 0 T Time t 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 Population (b) 10□1 100 101 Total time T 10□13 10□10 10□7 10□4 10□1 Infidelity (c) Baselin...

  3. [3]

    Quantum technologies - from ba- sic research to market

    We therefore solve Eq. (4) variationally withA D(t) =a ZY (t)ZY s +b x(t)Xs and Hc(t) =c x(t)Xs. As shown in Fig. 3, althoughZ 1Z2 is fixed, the variational dressed-frame protocol finds a numerically exact Bell-state preparation trajectory once sufficient entangling phase has accumulated. SinceZ1Z2 is the sole entangling resource, a theoretical speed limi...

    2021

  4. [4]

    Unanyan, L

    R. Unanyan, L. Yatsenko, K. Bergmann, and B. Shore, Laser-induced adiabatic atomic reorientation with con- trol of diabatic losses, Optics Communications139, 48 (1997)

    1997

  5. [5]

    Demirplak and S

    M. Demirplak and S. A. Rice, Adiabatic Population Transfer with Control Fields, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A107, 9937 (2003)

    2003

  6. [6]

    X. Chen, I. Lizuain, A. Ruschhaupt, D. Guéry-Odelin, and J. G. Muga, Shortcut to Adiabatic Passage in Two- and Three-Level Atoms, Physical Review Letters105, 6 123003 (2010)

    2010

  7. [7]

    Guéry-Odelin, A

    D. Guéry-Odelin, A. Ruschhaupt, A. Kiely, E. Tor- rontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Short- cuts to adiabaticity: Concepts, methods, and applica- tions, Reviews of Modern Physics91, 045001 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    Del Campo, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity by Counter- diabatic Driving, Physical Review Letters111, 100502 (2013)

    A. Del Campo, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity by Counter- diabatic Driving, Physical Review Letters111, 100502 (2013)

    2013

  9. [9]

    del Campo, M

    A. del Campo, M. M. Rams, and W. H. Zurek, Assisted Finite-Rate Adiabatic Passage Across a Quantum Criti- cal Point: Exact Solution for the Quantum Ising Model, Physical Review Letters109, 115703 (2012)

    2012

  10. [10]

    Motzoi, J

    F. Motzoi, J. M. Gambetta, P. Rebentrost, and F. K. Wilhelm, Simple Pulses for Elimination of Leakage in Weakly Nonlinear Qubits, Physical Review Letters103, 110501 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    Motzoi and F

    F. Motzoi and F. K. Wilhelm, Improving frequency se- lection of driven pulses using derivative-based transition suppression, Physical Review A88, 062318 (2013)

    2013

  12. [12]

    L. S. Theis, F. Motzoi, S. Machnes, and F. K. Wilhelm, Counteracting systems of diabaticities using DRAG con- trols: The status after 10 years, EPL (Europhysics Let- ters)123, 60001 (2018)

    2018

  13. [13]

    Li,Practical Methods for Efficient Analytical Control in Superconducting Qubits(Forschungszentrum Jülich,

    B. Li,Practical Methods for Efficient Analytical Control in Superconducting Qubits(Forschungszentrum Jülich,

  14. [14]

    J. M. Gambetta, F. Motzoi, S. T. Merkel, and F. K. Wil- helm, Analytic control methods for high-fidelity unitary operations in a weakly nonlinear oscillator, Physical Re- view A83, 012308 (2011)

    2011

  15. [15]

    D.SelsandA.Polkovnikov,Minimizingirreversiblelosses in quantum systems by local counterdiabatic driving, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, E3909 (2017)

    2017

  16. [16]

    Kolodrubetz, D

    M. Kolodrubetz, D. Sels, P. Mehta, and A. Polkovnikov, Geometry and non-adiabatic response in quantum and classical systems, Physics Reports697, 1 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    Takahashi, Transitionless quantum driving for spin systems, Physical Review E87, 062117 (2013)

    K. Takahashi, Transitionless quantum driving for spin systems, Physical Review E87, 062117 (2013)

    2013

  18. [18]

    Torrontegui, S

    E. Torrontegui, S. Martínez-Garaot, and J. G. Muga, Hamiltonian engineering via invariants and dynamical al- gebra, Physical Review A89, 043408 (2014)

    2014

  19. [19]

    Martínez-Garaot, E

    S. Martínez-Garaot, E. Torrontegui, X. Chen, and J. G. Muga,Shortcutstoadiabaticityinthree-levelsystemsus- ing Lie transforms, Physical Review A89, 053408 (2014)

    2014

  20. [20]

    Ribeiro and A

    H. Ribeiro and A. A. Clerk, Accelerated adiabatic quan- tum gates: Optimizing speed versus robustness, Physical Review A100, 032323 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Opatrný and K

    T. Opatrný and K. Mølmer, Partial suppression of nona- diabatic transitions, New Journal of Physics16, 015025 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    N. N. Hegade, K. Paul, Y. Ding, M. Sanz, F. Albarrán- Arriagada, E. Solano, and X. Chen, Shortcuts to Adi- abaticity in Digitized Adiabatic Quantum Computing, Physical Review Applied15, 024038 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Chandarana, N

    P. Chandarana, N. N. Hegade, K. Paul, F. Albarrán- Arriagada, E. Solano, A. del Campo, and X. Chen, Digitized-counterdiabatic quantum approximate opti- mization algorithm, Physical Review Research4, 013141 (2022)

    2022

  24. [24]

    L. S. Theis, F. Motzoi, and F. K. Wilhelm, Simultaneous gates in frequency-crowded multilevel systems using fast, robust, analytic control shapes, Physical Review A93, 012324 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    Ribeiro, A

    H. Ribeiro, A. Baksic, and A. A. Clerk, Systematic Magnus-Based Approach for Suppressing Leakage and NonadiabaticErrorsinQuantumDynamics,PhysicalRe- view X7, 011021 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    Petiziol, B

    F. Petiziol, B. Dive, F. Mintert, and S. Wimberger, Fast adiabatic evolution by oscillating initial Hamiltonians, Physical Review A98, 043436 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    P. W. Claeys, M. Pandey, D. Sels, and A. Polkovnikov, Floquet-Engineering Counterdiabatic Protocols in Quan- tum Many-Body Systems, Physical Review Letters123, 090602 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    P. M. Schindler and M. Bukov, Counterdiabatic Driving for Periodically Driven Systems, Physical Review Letters 133, 123402 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Petiziol, F

    F. Petiziol, F. Mintert, and S. Wimberger, Quantum control by effective counterdiabatic driving, Europhysics Letters145, 15001 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Y.-H.Chen, Y.Xia, Q.-C.Wu, B.-H.Huang,andJ.Song, Method for constructing shortcuts to adiabaticity by a substitute of counterdiabatic driving terms, Physical Re- view A93, 052109 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    Y.-H. Chen, W. Qin, X. Wang, A. Miranowicz, and F. Nori, Shortcuts to Adiabaticity for the Quantum Rabi Model: Efficient Generation of Giant Entangled Cat States via Parametric Amplification, Physical Review Letters126, 023602 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Čepait˙ e, A

    I. Čepait˙ e, A. Polkovnikov, A. J. Daley, and C. W. Duncan, Counterdiabatic Optimized Local Driving, PRX Quantum4, 010312 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Deschamps, G

    M. Deschamps, G. Kervern, D. Massiot, G. Pintacuda, L. Emsley, and P. J. Grandinetti, Superadiabaticity in magnetic resonance, The Journal of Chemical Physics 129, 204110 (2008)

    2008

  34. [34]

    Ibáñez, X

    S. Ibáñez, X. Chen, E. Torrontegui, J. G. Muga, and A. Ruschhaupt, Multiple Schrödinger Pictures and Dy- namics in Shortcuts to Adiabaticity, Physical Review Letters109, 100403 (2012)

    2012

  35. [35]

    Ibáñez, X

    S. Ibáñez, X. Chen, and J. G. Muga, Shortcuts to adia- baticity by superadiabatic iterations (2012)

    2012

  36. [36]

    Dupays, I

    L. Dupays, I. L. Egusquiza, A. del Campo, and A. Chenu, Superadiabatic thermalization of a quantum oscillator by engineered dephasing, Physical Review Research2, 033178 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    A. C. Santos and M. S. Sarandy, Superadiabatic Con- trolled Evolutions and Universal Quantum Computation, Scientific Reports5, 15775 (2015)

    2015

  38. [38]

    Theisen, F

    M. Theisen, F. Petiziol, S. Carretta, P. Santini, and S. Wimberger, Superadiabatic driving of a three-level quantum system, Physical Review A96, 013431 (2017)

    2017

  39. [39]

    Motzoi,Controlling Quantum Information Devices, Ph.D

    F. Motzoi,Controlling Quantum Information Devices, Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo (2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    Baksic, H

    A. Baksic, H. Ribeiro, and A. A. Clerk, Speeding up Adi- abatic Quantum State Transfer by Using Dressed States, Physical Review Letters116, 230503 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Li and X

    Y.-C. Li and X. Chen, Shortcut to adiabatic popula- tion transfer in quantum three-level systems: Effective two-level problems and feasible counterdiabatic driving, Physical Review A94, 063411 (2016)

    2016

  42. [42]

    Kang, Q.-C

    Y.-H. Kang, Q.-C. Wu, Y.-H. Chen, Z.-C. Shi, J. Song, and Y. Xia, Accelerating adiabatic quantum transfer for three-levelΛ-type structure systems via picture transfor- mation, Annals of Physics379, 102 (2017)

    2017

  43. [43]

    Li, T.Calarco, andF

    B. Li, T.Calarco, andF. Motzoi,Experimentalerror sup- pression in Cross-Resonance gates via multi-derivative 7 pulse shaping, npj Quantum Information10, 1 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    J. D. D. C. Jesus, B. Li, Y. Gao, R. Barends, F. A. Cárdenas-López, and F. Motzoi, Analytical blueprint for 99.999% fidelity X-gates on present superconducting hardware under strong driving (2025), arXiv:2512.19919 [quant-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Here we absorb ˙λinto the definition of the time-dependent generator and work directly withA 1 =iV † 1 ∂tV1

    In the standard adiabatic-gauge-potential notation one often writes the correction as ˙λAλ, whereA λ generates changes with respect to the control parameterλ. Here we absorb ˙λinto the definition of the time-dependent generator and work directly withA 1 =iV † 1 ∂tV1. This convention is more convenient for the dressed-frame con- struction below

  46. [46]

    Supplementary Material, See supplementary material for additional derivations and numerical details

  47. [47]

    H. R. Lewis, Jr. and W. B. Riesenfeld, An Exact Quan- tum Theory of the Time-Dependent Harmonic Oscillator and of a Charged Particle in a Time-Dependent Elec- tromagnetic Field, Journal of Mathematical Physics10, 1458 (1969)

    1969

  48. [48]

    R. Wang, Y. Feng, Y. Zhang, J. Ding, B. Li, F. Mot- zoi, Y. Gao, H. Xu, Z. Yang, W. Nuerbolati, H. Yu, W. Sun, and F. Yan, Suppressing Spurious Transitions Using Spectrally Balanced Pulse, Physical Review Let- ters135, 160804 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    S.Niu, A.Todri-Sanial,andN.T.Bronn,Multi-qubitdy- namical decoupling for enhanced crosstalk suppression, Quantum Science and Technology9, 045003 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Piltz, T

    C. Piltz, T. Sriarunothai, A. Varón, and C. Wunder- lich, A trapped-ion-based quantum byte with 10-5 next- neighbour cross-talk, Nature Communications5, 4679 (2014)

    2014

  51. [51]

    C. Fang, Y. Wang, S. Huang, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Crosstalk Suppression in Individually Addressed Two-Qubit Gates in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Com- puter, Physical Review Letters129, 240504 (2022), arXiv:2206.02703 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Rimbach-Russ, S

    M. Rimbach-Russ, S. G. J. Philips, X. Xue, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, Simple framework for systematic high- fidelity gate operations (2022), arXiv:2211.16241 [cond- mat, physics:quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  53. [53]

    Polat, R

    İ. Polat, R. W. J. Overwater, M. Rimbach-Russ, and F. Sebastiano, Pulse shaping for ultra-fast adi- abatic quantum gates, npj Quantum Information 10.1038/s41534-026-01245-8 (2026)

    doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01245-8 2026

  54. [54]

    Damski, Counterdiabatic driving of the quantum Ising model, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2014, P12019 (2014)

    B. Damski, Counterdiabatic driving of the quantum Ising model, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Ex- periment2014, P12019 (2014)

    2014

  55. [55]

    A. F. Terzis and E. Paspalakis, Entanglement in a two- qubit Ising model under a site-dependent external mag- netic field, Physics Letters A333, 438 (2004)

    2004

  56. [56]

    A. D. King, S. Suzuki, J. Raymond, A. Zucca, T. Lant- ing, F. Altomare, A. J. Berkley, S. Ejtemaee, E. Hoskin- son, S. Huang, E. Ladizinsky, A. J. R. MacDonald, G.Marsden, T.Oh, G.Poulin-Lamarre, M.Reis, C.Rich, Y. Sato, J. D. Whittaker, J. Yao, R. Harris, D. A. Lidar, H. Nishimori, and M. H. Amin, Coherent quantum an- nealing in a programmable 2,000 qubi...

    2022

  57. [57]

    Barnes, Analytically solvable two-level quantum sys- tems and Landau-Zener interferometry, Physical Review A88, 013818 (2013)

    E. Barnes, Analytically solvable two-level quantum sys- tems and Landau-Zener interferometry, Physical Review A88, 013818 (2013)

    2013

  58. [58]

    N. V. Vitanov and B. W. Shore, Designer evolution of quantum systems by inverse engineering, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics48, 174008 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    R. G. Unanyan, B. W. Shore, and K. Bergmann, Laser- driven population transfer in four-level atoms: Conse- quences of non-Abelian geometrical adiabatic phase fac- tors, Physical Review A59, 2910 (1999)

    1999

  60. [60]

    Leroux, K

    F. Leroux, K. Pandey, R. Rehbi, F. Chevy, C. Miniatura, B. Grémaud, and D. Wilkowski, Non-Abelian adiabatic geometric transformations in a cold strontium gas, Na- ture Communications9, 3580 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    Y. Xu, Z. Hua, T. Chen, X. Pan, X. Li, J. Han, W. Cai, Y. Ma, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Z.-Y. Xue, and L. Sun, Experimental Implementation of Universal Nonadiabatic Geometric Quantum Gates in a Superconducting Circuit, Physical Review Letters124, 230503 (2020)

    2020

  62. [62]

    Zhang, T

    J. Zhang, T. H. Kyaw, D. M. Tong, E. Sjöqvist, and L.-C. Kwek, Fast non-Abelian geometric gates via transition- less quantum driving, Scientific Reports5, 18414 (2015)

    2015

  63. [63]

    Q. Xie, K. Seki, and S. Yunoki, Variational counter- diabatic driving of the Hubbard model for ground-state preparation, Physical Review B106, 155153 (2022)

    2022

  64. [64]

    Takahashi and A

    K. Takahashi and A. Del Campo, Shortcuts to Adia- baticity in Krylov Space, Physical Review X14, 011032 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    B. Li, T. Calarco, and F. Motzoi, Nonperturbative Ana- lytical Diagonalization of Hamiltonians with Application to Circuit QED, PRX Quantum3, 030313 (2022)

    2022

  66. [66]

    Ohga and T

    N. Ohga and T. Hatomura, Improving variational coun- terdiabatic driving with weighted actions and computer algebra (2026), arXiv:2505.18367 [quant-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    Shevchenko, S

    S. Shevchenko, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Landau– Zener–Stückelberg interferometry, Physics Reports492, 1 (2010)

    2010

  68. [68]

    O. V. Ivakhnenko, S. N. Shevchenko, and F. Nori, Nona- diabatic Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana transi- tions, dynamics, and interference, Physics Reports995, 1 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    B. T. Torosov and N. V. Vitanov, Smooth composite pulses for high-fidelity quantum information processing, Physical Review A83, 053420 (2011)

    2011

  70. [70]

    A. I. Ryzhov, Alternative fast quantum logic gates using nonadiabatic Landau-Zener-Stückelberg-Majorana transitions, Physical Review Research6, 10.1103/Phys- RevResearch.6.033340 (2024)

    doi:10.1103/phys- 2024

  71. [71]

    Counterdiabatic Driving under Variational Frame Dressing

    S.Martínez-Garaot, A.Ruschhaupt, J.Gillet, Th.Busch, and J. G. Muga, Fast quasiadiabatic dynamics, Physical Review A92, 043406 (2015). 1 Supplementary material for "Counterdiabatic Driving under Variational Frame Dressing" I. DERIVATION OF THE LAB-FRAME DRESSED-FRAME COMMUTATOR EQUATIONS A. First-frame equation LetV 1(t)be the unitary that defines the fir...

    2015