Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 110 references

In a generic interacting 4D conformal field theory, universal null-integral operators built from the stress tensor generate the same wedge subalgebra of the loop algebra of w₁₊∞ found among the asymptotic symmetries of flat-space gravity, a

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 00:17 UTC pith:NTJCQG5I

load-bearing objection A real advance in light-ray algebras, conditional on a no-light-scalar assumption; deserves refereeing but the abstract overstates an extrapolation. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28718 v1 pith:NTJCQG5I submitted 2026-07-30 hep-th

Infinite Symmetry Algebras in Four-Dimensional Conformal Field Theories

Elizabeth Himwich , Monica Pate This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords light-ray operatorsw1+∞ algebrasoft graviton theoremconformal field theoryS algebracelestial holographyevent shapesasymptotic symmetries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper argues that every generic interacting four-dimensional conformal field theory—subject to a mild restriction on light scalar operators—contains a hidden infinite-dimensional symmetry: a specific family of operators formed by integrating the stress tensor along null lines. These operators generate the same wedge subalgebra of the loop algebra of w₁₊∞ that appears in the asymptotic symmetries of asymptotically flat gravity. Their one-point functions in scalar states are finite, fixed entirely by conformal three-point functions, and exactly match descendants of the universal soft factors of the infinite soft-graviton tower. An analogous construction from a conserved current yields the gauge-theoretic 'S algebra' and reproduces the soft gauge-boson tower. If correct, the result places w₁₊∞ symmetry on a non-perturbative footing inside ordinary CFTs rather than as a perturbative artifact of flat-space scattering.

Core claim

The authors prove by induction that, in a 4D CFT with no light neutral scalars of dimension 1≤Δ≤2, the explicit null-integral operators W^p built from the stress tensor satisfy the commutator (1.3). Smearing these operators with the transverse wedge modes (1.4) projects out the non-universal 'other operator' terms, leaving exactly the wedge subalgebra of the loop algebra of w₁₊∞ (1.5)—the same algebra found among gravitational asymptotic symmetries. A parallel construction from a conserved current gives the S algebra (1.12), and mixed commutators give the adjoint action of w₁₊∞ on S (1.15). The one-point functions of both towers in scalar states are finite and, when transformed to momentum s

What carries the argument

The central objects are the light-ray operators W^p and S^p: null integrals of the stress tensor or conserved current, assembled into SL(2,C) highest-weight primaries of definite 4D scaling dimension. The main technical device is 'Poincaré recursion': covariance under translations and Lorentz generators fixes the commutators order by order in scaling dimension, while an induction step rules out all operators in the kernel of P_u except those that vanish after wedge integration. The transverse-sphere wedge modes act as a projection that removes the non-universal terms and isolates the w₁₊∞ and S algebras.

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on the assumption that in a generic interacting 4D CFT with no light neutral scalars of scaling dimension 1≤Δ≤2, two stress tensors on the same light sheet exchange only the identity and the stress tensor—if such a scalar exists, extra operators can appear in the light-ray commutators and the induction no longer applies.

What would settle it

Compute the light-ray commutator [W^p,W^q] in a specific interacting 4D CFT that contains a scalar operator of dimension between 1 and 2, using a four-point function such as ⟨O T T O⟩; any new light-ray operator that survives wedge smearing and enters inside the wedge would falsify the claimed w₁₊∞ algebra.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Every generic interacting 4D CFT (with the stated operator-content assumption) realizes the same infinite symmetry algebra found in asymptotically flat gravity, so the algebra is not an artifact of perturbation theory or of asymptotic expansions.
  • The one-point functions of the W^p and S^p generators give a non-perturbatively exact, manifestly finite meaning to the infinite tower of soft graviton and gauge-boson factors, which were previously defined only perturbatively.
  • The ANEC operator is identified as the lowest member of an infinite family of local translation-like generators, extending the familiar averaged null energy condition to a full algebraic structure.
  • The conserved-current construction yields an 'S algebra' in the adjoint representation of w₁₊∞, providing a four-dimensional analog of Kac-Moody current symmetry.
  • A local version of the full conformal algebra appears as a subalgebra, giving light-ray realizations of all global conformal generators, including special conformal transformations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference beyond the paper: if the wedge algebra survives in theories with light neutral scalars, the free-field examples suggest that corrections can be absorbed into trace-like or composite operators; a systematic classification of such corrections, which the paper leaves open, would determine how universal w₁₊∞ really is.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the manifest finiteness of the one-point functions suggests that new sum rules or positivity constraints on event shapes could be derived from the algebra, generalizing ANEC-type bounds to all orders in the soft expansion.
  • Inference beyond the paper: if the algebra extends to higher-point correlators, its interplay with the soft tower could constrain large-N holographic limits and may provide a CFT-side handle on the 'stringy equivalence principle' mechanism, though the paper only sketches these directions.
  • Inference beyond the paper: the same SL(2,C) classification and Poincaré-recursion technology could be adapted to other spacetime dimensions or to light-ray operators built from higher-spin conserved currents, yielding new symmetry algebras the paper does not construct.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper constructs explicit infinite families of light-ray operators built from null integrals of the stress tensor (W^p) and conserved currents (S^p) in four-dimensional CFTs, classifies them systematically by scaling dimension and SL(2,C) weights, and proves — under the assumption that there are no light neutral scalars of dimension 1≤Δ≤2 — that the W^p operators satisfy the commutator (4.29), whose wedge modes close into the wedge subalgebra of the loop algebra of w_{1+∞}. The parallel S-algebra and mixed W-S commutators are derived by the same inductive Poincaré-recursion method. The paper also computes one-point functions of W^p and S^p in scalar states and identifies them, at the orders explicitly checked, with descendants of universal soft graviton/gluon factors. Free-scalar examples are given to illustrate how violations of the light-scalar assumption modify the algebra outside the wedge.

Significance. If correct, this is a substantial result: it realizes the gravitational w_{1+∞} algebra in the light-ray sector of ordinary interacting 4D CFTs, and relates one-point event shapes to the full tower of soft theorems in a manifestly finite, non-perturbative way. The paper is unusually concrete: the generators are given in closed form, low-order commutators are checked against the earlier results of [10,16], and the one-point functions at checked order rely only on conformally fixed three-point functions, so no free parameters enter. The central caveats are that the algebra theorem is explicitly conditional on the light-scalar assumption, and that the all-orders one-point formula is extrapolated from finite-order checks rather than proven.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.29), footnote 9] The main w_{1+∞} theorem is proved only under the no-light-neutral-scalar assumption of §4.1, following [16]. Section 7 shows that free scalar theory violates this assumption and produces extra ϕϕ (Δ=2) corrections in (7.7), while footnote 9 explicitly leaves open the general classification of light-scalar corrections. The abstract and introduction nevertheless advertise the result for 'generic interacting four-dimensional CFTs.' This is stronger than what is proven. Please either prove that corrections from scalars with 1≤Δ≤2 always remain outside the wedge, or state the theorem as conditional on the operator-content assumption and adjust the abstract/introduction accordingly.
  2. [§6.1.1–6.1.2, Eqs. (6.25), (6.31)] The position-space formula (6.25) and its momentum-space consequence (6.31) are explicitly derived only up to m=4; the text says 'we expect' the pattern to hold for all m. The abstract, however, claims that the one-point functions are 'explicitly demonstrated' to be finite and exactly match the soft factors. This all-orders statement is not proven. Please provide an induction or a general argument for (6.25), or qualify the claims as checked up to m=4. The same issue applies to the current one-point formula (6.39).
  3. [§4.5, Eqs. (1.3)/(4.29)] For p=q=3/2, the first term on the right-hand side involves W^{p+q−2}=W^1, but W^1 is not part of the defined family W^p with p=(m+4)/2, m≥−1. The formula can be consistent only if W^1 is understood to vanish (or is a central term that is dropped together with identity contributions). Please state this explicitly; as written, (1.3) and (4.29) are ambiguous for the lowest wedge-generator pair.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The notation W^{m+4}{2} and S^{m+2}{2} in equations (1.2), (1.6), (1.9), (1.13) is typeset ambiguously; the superscripts should be printed as W^{(m+4)/2}, S^{(m+2)/2}, etc., to avoid confusion with W^{m+4}/2.
  2. [§7.1, after (7.5)] The sentence 'The analysis of [36,37] establishes this pattern at all orders' is a useful pointer, but it refers only to free scalars. Since the preceding paragraphs present checks only at low orders, please make the distinction between free-field all-orders results and general interacting corrections more explicit.
  3. [§3.4, Eq. (3.44)] The relation between L_m here and L_n in [15,16] is given in the text, but it is easy to overlook. A one-line clarifying note directly below (3.44) would improve readability.
  4. [§6.1.1, Eq. (6.19)] The phrase 'exactly cancels the first term in second line of (6.18)' is somewhat opaque because the two expressions look different at first glance; marking the corresponding terms or adding a brief algebraic note would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: the w_{1+∞} commutator is derived from Poincaré/SL(2,C) constraints and explicit null-integral generators, not imposed by definition.

full rationale

The central claim is conditional on an explicit operator-content assumption (§4.1, following [16]), but that is a stated premise, not an output of the derivation. The W^p/W_m operators are explicit SL(2,C) primaries built from null integrals of the stress tensor (3.59), and the commutator (4.29)/(1.5) is proved by induction using the Jacobi identity with P_u and SL(2,C) covariance, with low-order base cases computed from the light-ray OPE. The wedge modes are defined so that derivative terms ∂^ℓ δ with ℓ≥2p−1 vanish under the mode integral; this is a kinematic projection, and the proof's nontrivial content is showing that all remaining terms have exactly those derivative structures. The soft-factor comparison in §6 is an independent check: the one-point functions are computed from conformal three-point functions fixed by symmetry, and the [46] soft factors are quoted from a separate amplitude computation; matching them is not used to derive the algebra. The free-scalar violation in §7 is an acknowledged limitation of the assumed operator-content restriction, not a circular step. No load-bearing self-citation or definitional reduction is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation introduces no fitted parameters: operator normalizations are chosen for convenience, and the three-point function coefficient a = −2Δ/(3π²) is fixed by the Ward identity with unit two-point normalization (§6.1). The central claims rest on three loaded domain assumptions, of which the no-light-scalar OPE restriction is the most consequential (explicitly flagged by the authors), plus literature results used to identify the target algebra and soft factors ([2,3,46]). No new particles, forces, or degrees of freedom are postulated: the W^p and S^p generators are explicit integrals of the existing stress tensor (1.2) and conserved current (1.9).

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Absence of light neutral scalars with 1 ≤ Δ ≤ 2
    Invoked in §4.1 following [16] to restrict the stress-tensor OPE on a light sheet to identity + stress tensor, so commutators contain only null integrals of the stress tensor (4.2). Load-bearing for the induction proof of (1.3)/(4.29). Explicitly flagged; general corrections from violating scalars left open (footnote 9).
  • domain assumption CFT fall-off conditions: T_uu,T_uz,T_zz,T_zz̄ ~ r^{-2}; T_rz,T_ur ~ r^{-4}; T_rr ~ r^{-6}
    Derived in §3.1 from inversion symmetry applied to correlation functions (3.8); underpins the classification of light-ray operators by scaling dimension (§3.4).
  • domain assumption Two-stress-tensor light-sheet OPE is identity + stress tensor (under the no-light-scalar assumption)
    Quoted from [16] in §4.1; this is the input that fixes the operator content of all commutators computed in Section 4.
  • domain assumption Convergence of null-integrals and iϵ prescriptions in correlation functions
    Assumed throughout Section 6 (e.g. the iϵ choice (6.5)); the paper cites [11] for sufficient conditions in four-point functions and notes discrepancies observed in [15] (footnote 8).
  • domain assumption Target-algebra identification: (1.5) is the wedge subalgebra of the loop algebra of w_{1+∞}; soft-factor formula (6.35)
    Taken from the celestial-holography literature [2,3,46] (partly the authors' own work). Used as the identification target and comparison quantity, not as input to the commutator derivation.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 70815 in / 27527 out tokens · 258042 ms · 2026-08-03T00:17:00.004164+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In generic interacting four-dimensional Lorentzian conformal field theories, an infinite set of universal light-ray operators constructed from the stress tensor is shown to generate the wedge subalgebra of the loop algebra of ${\rm w}_{1+\infty}$. This algebra was recently identified among the asymptotic symmetries of asymptotically flat spacetimes. The one-point functions of the ${\rm w}_{1+\infty}$ generators in scalar states (also known as one-point event shapes) are explicitly demonstrated to be finite and are precisely related to universal soft factors in the infinite tower of soft graviton theorems. A second universal class of light-ray operators that generates the ''$S$ algebra,'' the gauge-theoretic analog of ${\rm w}_{1+\infty}$, is also constructed and shown to have finite one-point functions in four-dimensional conformal field theories with a spin-one conserved current. Along with the details of these results, this paper presents a general classification of stress-tensor and conserved current light-ray operators by scaling dimension and Lorentz ${\rm SL}(2,\mathbb{C})$ weights, a general technique for computing commutators by Poincar\'e recursion, results for other light-ray operator algebras including a local version of the four-dimensional conformal symmetry algebra, and examples for free scalar fields.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 94 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,

    A. Strominger, “Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,” arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,

    A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate, and A. Strominger, “Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,”JHEP11(2021) 152,arXiv:2103.03961 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,

    A. Strominger, “w 1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127no. 22, (2021) 221601, arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators,

    I. I. Balitsky and V. M. Braun, “Evolution Equations for QCD String Operators,”Nucl. Phys. B311(1989) 541–584

    1989

  5. [5]

    The Uses of conformal symmetry in QCD,

    V. M. Braun, G. P. Korchemsky, and D. M¨ uller, “The Uses of conformal symmetry in QCD,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.51(2003) 311–398,arXiv:hep-ph/0306057

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  6. [6]

    Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,

    D. M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, “Conformal collider physics: Energy and charge correlations,”JHEP05(2008) 012,arXiv:0803.1467 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,

    S. Caron-Huot, “Analyticity in Spin in Conformal Theories,”JHEP09(2017) 078, arXiv:1703.00278 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    A spacetime derivation of the Lorentzian OPE inversion formula,

    D. Simmons-Duffin, D. Stanford, and E. Witten, “A spacetime derivation of the Lorentzian OPE inversion formula,”JHEP07(2018) 085,arXiv:1711.03816 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,

    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Light-ray operators in conformal field theory,”JHEP 11(2018) 102,arXiv:1805.00098 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Light-ray Operators and the BMS Algebra,

    C. C´ ordova and S.-H. Shao, “Light-ray Operators and the BMS Algebra,”Phys. Rev. D98 no. 12, (2018) 125015,arXiv:1810.05706 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Shocks, Superconvergence, and a Stringy Equivalence Principle,

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “Shocks, Superconvergence, and a Stringy Equivalence Principle,”JHEP11(2020) 096, arXiv:1904.05905 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,

    M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “The light-ray OPE and conformal colliders,”JHEP01(2021) 128,arXiv:1905.01311 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Dispersive CFT Sum Rules,

    S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Dispersive CFT Sum Rules,”JHEP05(2021) 243,arXiv:2008.04931 [hep-th]. 76

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Transverse spin in the light-ray OPE,

    C.-H. Chang, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Zhiboedov, “Transverse spin in the light-ray OPE,”JHEP05(2022) 059,arXiv:2010.04726 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    On the stress tensor light-ray operator algebra,

    A. Belin, D. M. Hofman, G. Mathys, and M. T. Walters, “On the stress tensor light-ray operator algebra,”JHEP05(2021) 033,arXiv:2011.13862 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    On local and integrated stress-tensor commutators,

    M. Be¸ sken, J. De Boer, and G. Mathys, “On local and integrated stress-tensor commutators,”JHEP21(2020) 148,arXiv:2012.15724 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Distributions in CFT. Part II. Minkowski space,

    P. Kravchuk, J. Qiao, and S. Rychkov, “Distributions in CFT. Part II. Minkowski space,” JHEP08(2021) 094,arXiv:2104.02090 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    On the light-ray algebra in conformal field theories,

    G. P. Korchemsky and A. Zhiboedov, “On the light-ray algebra in conformal field theories,” JHEP02(2022) 140,arXiv:2109.13269 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity,

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity,”JHEP05(2023) 122,arXiv:2201.06602 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Three-point energy correlators and the celestial block expansion,

    C.-H. Chang and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Three-point energy correlators and the celestial block expansion,”JHEP02(2023) 126,arXiv:2202.04090 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Detectors in weakly-coupled field theories,

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Kologlu, P. Kravchuk, D. Meltzer, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Detectors in weakly-coupled field theories,”JHEP04(2023) 014,arXiv:2209.00008 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Averaged null energy and the renormalization group,

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, “Averaged null energy and the renormalization group,”JHEP 12(2023) 139,arXiv:2309.14409 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Null energy constraints on two-dimensional RG flows,

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, “Null energy constraints on two-dimensional RG flows,”JHEP 01(2024) 102,arXiv:2310.15217 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Spinning dispersive CFT sum rules and bulk scattering,

    C.-H. Chang, Y. Landau, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Spinning dispersive CFT sum rules and bulk scattering,”JHEP04(2025) 016,arXiv:2311.04271 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Missing local operators, zeros, and twist-4 trajectories,

    J. Henriksson, P. Kravchuk, and B. Oertel, “Missing local operators, zeros, and twist-4 trajectories,”JHEP07(2024) 248,arXiv:2312.09283 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Light-ray sum rules and the c-anomaly,

    T. Hartman and G. Mathys, “Light-ray sum rules and the c-anomaly,”JHEP08(2024) 008,arXiv:2405.10137 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Light-ray wave functions and integrability,

    A. Homrich, D. Simmons-Duffin, and P. Vieira, “Light-ray wave functions and integrability,”JHEP10(2024) 125,arXiv:2409.02160 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Regge trajectories, detectors, and distributions in the critical O(N) model,

    Y.-Z. Li and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Regge trajectories, detectors, and distributions in the critical O(N) model,”arXiv:2506.06419 [hep-th]. 77

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Seeing through the confinement screen: DGLAP/BFKL mixing and light-ray matching in QCD,

    C.-H. Chang, H. Chen, D. Simmons-Duffin, and H. X. Zhu, “Seeing through the confinement screen: DGLAP/BFKL mixing and light-ray matching in QCD,” arXiv:2506.06431 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    Do null defects dream of conformal symmetry?,

    R. S. Erramilli, J. Kulp, and F. K. Popov, “Do null defects dream of conformal symmetry?,”arXiv:2509.04578 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [31]

    Energy Correlator Conformal Blocks and Positivity,

    B. Me¸ caj, I. Moult, M. T. Walters, and Y. Xin, “Energy Correlator Conformal Blocks and Positivity,”arXiv:2512.09986 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    New magnetic symmetries in (d+ 2)-dimensional QED,

    T. He and P. Mitra, “New magnetic symmetries in (d+ 2)-dimensional QED,”JHEP01 (2021) 122,arXiv:1907.02808 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Quantum BMS transformations in conformally flat space-times and holography,

    L. Donnay, G. Giribet, and F. Rosso, “Quantum BMS transformations in conformally flat space-times and holography,”JHEP12(2020) 102,arXiv:2008.05483 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Light-ray operators, detectors and gravitational event shapes,

    R. Gonzo and A. Pokraka, “Light-ray operators, detectors and gravitational event shapes,” JHEP05(2021) 015,arXiv:2012.01406 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    Higher spin dynamics in gravity andw 1+∞ celestial symmetries,

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu, “Higher spin dynamics in gravity andw 1+∞ celestial symmetries,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 8, (2022) 086013,arXiv:2112.15573 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Celestial conformal colliders,

    Y. Hu and S. Pasterski, “Celestial conformal colliders,”JHEP02(2023) 243, arXiv:2211.14287 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Detector operators for celestial symmetries,

    Y. Hu and S. Pasterski, “Detector operators for celestial symmetries,”JHEP12(2023) 035, arXiv:2307.16801 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Energy Detectors and Asymptotic Symmetries,

    H. A. Gonz´ alez and J. Salzer, “Energy Detectors and Asymptotic Symmetries,” arXiv:2510.27348 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    Memory Correlators and Ward Identities in the ’in-in’ Formalism,

    I. Moult, S. A. Narayanan, and S. Pasterski, “Memory Correlators and Ward Identities in the ’in-in’ Formalism,”arXiv:2512.02825 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    Asymptotic charges as detectors and the memory effect in massive QED and perturbative quantum gravity,

    B. Oertel, I. Moult, and S. Pasterski, “Asymptotic charges as detectors and the memory effect in massive QED and perturbative quantum gravity,”arXiv:2604.19866 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Soft Algebras in AdS 4 from Light Ray Operators in CFT 3,

    A. Sheta, A. Strominger, A. Tropper, and H. Wei, “Soft Algebras in AdS 4 from Light Ray Operators in CFT 3,”arXiv:2601.00096 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    EVERY CFT 3 HAS ANL Λw1+∞ SYMMETRY,

    A. Strominger and H. Wei, “EVERY CFT 3 HAS ANL Λw1+∞ SYMMETRY,” arXiv:2603.26459 [hep-th]. 78

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Modular Hamiltonians on the null plane and the Markov property of the vacuum state,

    H. Casini, E. Teste, and G. Torroba, “Modular Hamiltonians on the null plane and the Markov property of the vacuum state,”J. Phys. A50no. 36, (2017) 364001, arXiv:1703.10656 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    Lightcone Commutator and Stress-Tensor Exchange ind >2 CFTs,

    K.-W. Huang, “Lightcone Commutator and Stress-Tensor Exchange ind >2 CFTs,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 2, (2020) 021701,arXiv:2002.00110 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  45. [45]

    d >2 stress-tensor operator product expansion near a line,

    K.-W. Huang, “d >2 stress-tensor operator product expansion near a line,”Phys. Rev. D 103no. 12, (2021) 121702,arXiv:2103.09930 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  46. [46]

    w 1+∞ in 4D gravitational scattering,

    E. Himwich and M. Pate, “w 1+∞ in 4D gravitational scattering,”JHEP07(2024) 180, arXiv:2312.08597 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Notes on Conformal Soft Theorems and Recursion Relations in Gravity,

    A. Guevara, “Notes on Conformal Soft Theorems and Recursion Relations in Gravity,” arXiv:1906.07810 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1906

  48. [48]

    Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,

    E. Himwich, M. Pate, and K. Singh, “Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,”JHEP01(2022) 080,arXiv:2108.07763 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Celestialw 1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,

    T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, “Celestialw 1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,” SIGMA18(2022) 016,arXiv:2110.06066 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Celestial operator products from the worldsheet,

    T. Adamo, W. Bu, E. Casali, and A. Sharma, “Celestial operator products from the worldsheet,”JHEP06(2022) 052,arXiv:2111.02279 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  51. [51]

    Celestial Lw 1+∞ charges from a twistor action,

    A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “Celestial Lw 1+∞ charges from a twistor action,”JHEP10(2024) 250,arXiv:2407.04028 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    w1+∞Algebra with a Cosmological Constant and the Celestial Sphere,

    T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu, “w1+∞Algebra with a Cosmological Constant and the Celestial Sphere,”Phys. Rev. Lett.132no. 22, (2024) 221602,arXiv:2312.00876 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    On AdS 4 deformations of celestial symmetries,

    R. Bittleston, G. Bogna, S. Heuveline, A. Kmec, L. Mason, and D. Skinner, “On AdS 4 deformations of celestial symmetries,”JHEP07(2024) 010,arXiv:2403.18011 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Celestial holography meets twisted holography: 4d amplitudes from chiral correlators,

    K. Costello and N. M. Paquette, “Celestial holography meets twisted holography: 4d amplitudes from chiral correlators,”JHEP10(2022) 193,arXiv:2201.02595 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    On infinite symmetry algebras in Yang-Mills theory,

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu, “On infinite symmetry algebras in Yang-Mills theory,”JHEP12(2023) 009,arXiv:2306.02373 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    S-algebra in gauge theory: twistor, spacetime and holographic perspectives,

    A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Sharma, “S-algebra in gauge theory: twistor, spacetime and holographic perspectives,”Class. Quant. Grav.42no. 19, (2025) 195008, arXiv:2506.01888 [hep-th]. 79

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    A Proof of the Conformal Collider Bounds,

    D. M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland, and F. Rejon-Barrera, “A Proof of the Conformal Collider Bounds,”JHEP06(2016) 111,arXiv:1603.03771 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition,

    T. Faulkner, R. G. Leigh, O. Parrikar, and H. Wang, “Modular Hamiltonians for Deformed Half-Spaces and the Averaged Null Energy Condition,”JHEP09(2016) 038, arXiv:1605.08072 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality,

    T. Hartman, S. Kundu, and A. Tajdini, “Averaged Null Energy Condition from Causality,” JHEP07(2017) 066,arXiv:1610.05308 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  60. [60]

    Bounds on OPE Coefficients from Interference Effects in the Conformal Collider,

    C. Cordova, J. Maldacena, and G. J. Turiaci, “Bounds on OPE Coefficients from Interference Effects in the Conformal Collider,”JHEP11(2017) 032,arXiv:1710.03199 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Universal Bounds on Operator Dimensions from the Average Null Energy Condition,

    C. Cordova and K. Diab, “Universal Bounds on Operator Dimensions from the Average Null Energy Condition,”JHEP02(2018) 131,arXiv:1712.01089 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Focusing bounds for CFT correlators and the S-matrix,

    T. Hartman, Y. Jiang, F. Sgarlata, and A. Tajdini, “Focusing bounds for CFT correlators and the S-matrix,”arXiv:2212.01942 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment,

    I. Moult and H. X. Zhu, “Energy Correlators: A Journey From Theory to Experiment,” arXiv:2506.09119 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [64]

    On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,

    A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,”JHEP07(2014) 152, arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, “BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,”JHEP05(2015) 151,arXiv:1401.7026 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    Infrared photons and gravitons,

    S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravitons,”Phys. Rev.140(1965) B516–B524

    1965

  67. [67]

    Semiclassical Virasoro symmetry of the quantum gravityS-matrix,

    D. Kapec, V. Lysov, S. Pasterski, and A. Strominger, “Semiclassical Virasoro symmetry of the quantum gravityS-matrix,”JHEP08(2014) 058,arXiv:1406.3312 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  68. [68]

    Asymptotic symmetries of gravity and soft theorems for massive particles,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic symmetries of gravity and soft theorems for massive particles,”JHEP12(2015) 094,arXiv:1509.01406 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    Sub-subleading soft gravitons and large diffeomorphisms,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Sub-subleading soft gravitons and large diffeomorphisms,” JHEP01(2017) 036,arXiv:1608.00685 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    BMS Supertranslations and Not So Soft Gravitons,

    E. Conde and P. Mao, “BMS Supertranslations and Not So Soft Gravitons,”JHEP05 (2017) 060,arXiv:1612.08294 [hep-th]. 80

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger, “Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem,” arXiv:1404.4091 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    Sub-subleading soft gravitons: New symmetries of quantum gravity?,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Sub-subleading soft gravitons: New symmetries of quantum gravity?,”Phys. Lett. B764(2017) 218–221,arXiv:1605.09094 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  73. [73]

    Asymptotic symmetries in Bondi gauge and the sub-subleading soft graviton theorem,

    B. Horn, “Asymptotic symmetries in Bondi gauge and the sub-subleading soft graviton theorem,”Class. Quant. Grav.40no. 23, (2023) 235009,arXiv:2212.02566 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  74. [74]

    THE PARTICLE CONTENT OF LINEARIZED CONFORMAL GRA VITY,

    R. J. Riegert, “THE PARTICLE CONTENT OF LINEARIZED CONFORMAL GRA VITY,”Phys. Lett. A105(1984) 110–112

    1984

  75. [75]

    Asymptotic higher spin symmetries I: covariant wedge algebra in gravity,

    N. Cresto and L. Freidel, “Asymptotic higher spin symmetries I: covariant wedge algebra in gravity,”Lett. Math. Phys.115no. 2, (2025) 39,arXiv:2409.12178 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Asymptotic higher spin symmetries II: Noether realization in gravity,

    N. Cresto and L. Freidel, “Asymptotic higher spin symmetries II: Noether realization in gravity,”JHEP03(2026) 147,arXiv:2410.15219 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  77. [77]

    Stress-Tensor Commutators and Schwinger Terms,

    S. Deser and D. Boulware, “Stress-Tensor Commutators and Schwinger Terms,”J. Math. Phys.8(1967) 1468

    1967

  78. [78]

    From correlation functions to event shapes,

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, “From correlation functions to event shapes,”Nucl. Phys. B884(2014) 305–343, arXiv:1309.0769 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [79]

    Event shapes inN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory,

    A. V. Belitsky, S. Hohenegger, G. P. Korchemsky, E. Sokatchev, and A. Zhiboedov, “Event shapes inN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory,”Nucl. Phys. B884(2014) 206–256, arXiv:1309.1424 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  80. [80]

    Aspects of QCD Current Algebra on a Null Plane,

    S. R. Beane and T. J. Hobbs, “Aspects of QCD Current Algebra on a Null Plane,”Annals Phys.372(2016) 329–356,arXiv:1512.00098 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

Showing first 80 references.