Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 98 references

Scaling 5G MIMO from tens to hundreds of antenna ports breaks at four coupled system bottlenecks, so 6G must decouple aperture size from active chains and channel-sounding cost.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Scaling 5G MIMO to 256+ ports at 7–8 GHz breaks on common-channel coverage, RF/array power, and CSI overhead; the paper maps a roadmap that decouples radiating elements, RF chains, and acquired channel dimensions.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-03 challenge →

load-bearing objection A solid, honest 6G roadmap whose central decoupling thesis is plausible but still hangs on an unmeasured rank-scaling assumption; worth refereeing, not because the claims are proven, but because the field needs this synthesis. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28965 v1 pith:E2MBGKZE submitted 2026-07-31 eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT

When 5G MIMO Scaling Breaks: Toward 6G Upper-Mid-Band Extreme MIMO

Kwang Soon Kim , Jeonghun Park , Byung-Wook Min , Kwanghoon Lee , Eui Whan Jin , Juntaek Han , Geonwoo Park , Jun-Seok Ko
show 4 more authors
Jungho Myung Wooram Shin Young-Jo Ko Chan-Byoung Chae
This is my paper
classification eess.SP cs.ITmath.IT
keywords FR3upper-mid bandextreme MIMO6Gmassive MIMO scalingCSI acquisitiontri-hybrid MIMOcoverage asymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that extreme MIMO — packing 256 or more antenna ports into the same base-station panel used at 3.5 GHz — cannot be achieved by simply enlarging the 5G New Radio design. Four coupled limits break it: wide-beam common and control channels get no aperture gain; RF devices and power amplifiers fall behind at 7 GHz over fourfold wider bandwidths; powering hundreds of always-on digital chains becomes unsustainable; and channel-state acquisition overhead grows with port count. The central constructive claim is that these four quantities — radiating elements, antenna ports, active RF chains, and the dimension of acquired channel information — can and should scale at different rates. The paper lays out a roadmap of protocol-aware coverage, low-power tri-hybrid array architectures, distributed apertures, and rank-based, scene-rendered CSI acquisition, with simulation evidence that equal-aperture scaling alone leaves common, control, and data channels 16–38 dB below 5G targets in the worst-case environment.

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the equal-aperture argument for upper-mid-band 6G is a statement about the user-data channel only. The PDSCH uses UE-specific narrow beams and exploits the full aperture gain, while SSB, CSI-RS, SRS, and uplink channels do not; in a representative equal-aperture 7 GHz simulation the median relative gains of SSB, CSI-RS, and PDSCH fall 15.9, 17.2, and 37.7 dB below the corresponding 3.5 GHz link in the worst combined deep-NLOS and outdoor-to-indoor environment. From this coverage asymmetry together with RF, power, and CSI scaling mismatches, the paper concludes that a uniform extension of 5G NR is infeasible at the E-MIMO scale and that the system must de

What carries the argument

Two formal devices carry the argument. First, the tri-hybrid signal model x_ant = F_ant F_ana F_dig s, which separates the number of physical radiating elements Nrad from actively driven ports Nport and RF chains NRF; dynamic-metasurface and fluid-antenna realizations put spatial processing into the aperture itself, letting the accessible aperture grow without always-on chains. Second, the covariance-subspace channel model h ≈ U_r g, where U_r holds the r dominant eigenvectors of the spatial covariance R; when the FR3 channel's angular spread narrows, r grows sublinearly in port count, and sounding, feedback, codebook quantization, prediction, and scheduling can all be confined to r dimensio

Load-bearing premise

The whole CSI-acquisition roadmap assumes the FR3 channel at 256+ elements lives in a low-dimensional subspace whose rank grows much more slowly than the number of antenna ports; the paper's own Section II-B admits that covariance behavior at 768–1,024 elements awaits measurement.

What would settle it

Measure the spatial covariance rank at a 256-, 512-, and 1,024-element equal-aperture FR3 array in outdoor urban NLOS. If the 95% energy rank grows roughly proportionally with port count (e.g., r ≈ N_t/4 or worse) rather than sublinearly, the overhead savings, the 3/(r-1) bit-gain figure, and the 3D-GS rendering roadmap collapse.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • 6G base stations can host 512–1,024 radiating elements while keeping only tens of active RF chains, with beamforming gain retained through passive beamforming networks and reconfigurable apertures.
  • CSI acquisition overhead, which scales with port count in 5G, can instead scale with effective rank; at 256 ports and r=8, each feedback bit's accuracy improves by a factor of about 36.
  • Channel statistics can be treated as properties of locations rather than of terminals, so a scene learned from past observations can render beamspace profiles at unseen positions and cut sweeping overhead.
  • Coverage must be designed channel-by-channel: closing wide-beam and indoor-penetration gaps may require hierarchical beam management and in-building solutions rather than higher transmit power.
  • Distributed apertures convert installed spatial diversity into proximity gain, but only if RU activation, synchronization, and fronthaul costs are jointly controlled.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 37.7 dB PDSCH deficit is an artifact of the paper's deliberately unoptimized scheduling and precoding; a realistic optimizer would shift that curve substantially, so the true coverage asymmetry between data and control channels is likely smaller than the headline number — but the SSB and CSI-RS deficits are robust.
  • If the low-rank premise holds, the same rendering idea could be extended from beamspace power profiles to full covariance rendering, eliminating per-UE sounding entirely; the paper leaves this as open.
  • The decoupling principle generalizes beyond FR3: any array where aperture can grow without proportional RF chains, such as lens-based or metasurface arrays at mmWave, inherits the same rank-scaling CSI argument.
  • The paper's coverage study treats only co-located RUs; an equal-aperture distributed deployment would close part of the indoor gap, suggesting the roadmap's DMIMO section and coverage section are best read as one design.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This invited paper argues that a direct extension of the 5G NR architecture to 6G upper-mid-band (FR3, 7–8 GHz) extreme MIMO with 256+ ports runs into four coupled system-level limitations: coverage asymmetry across physical channels and protocol states, wideband/energy-efficient RF and RU implementation, array/beamforming power consumption, and CSI-acquisition overhead. The authors propose a common decoupling principle—N_rad, N_port, N_RF, and the effective channel rank r need not scale together—and illustrate it with protocol-aware beam management, tri-hybrid MIMO architectures, distributed apertures, and AI/scene-based CSI acquisition. The quantitative support consists of a ray-tracing coverage comparison (Fig. 2) and a 3D-GS beamspace-rendering proof-of-concept (Figs. 8–9).

Significance. If the decoupling principle holds, the paper provides a useful organizing framework for FR3 E-MIMO and clearly separates the dimensions that must scale from those that should not. Its strengths are the comprehensive synthesis of FR3 spectrum, propagation measurements, and Release 19 channel-model changes; the explicit four-breakpoint formulation; clean mathematical models for tri-hybrid MIMO (Eq. 1), power accounting (Eq. 2), and subspace-limited feedback (Eqs. 3, 6–8); and the candid labeling of the coverage simulation as unoptimized and illustrative. The central risk is that the CSI roadmap rests on an untested scaling law for channel rank at 768–1024 elements, a premise the paper itself flags as open in Sec. II-B.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. VI-A and Sec. II-B] The entire CSI-acquisition roadmap (beamformed CSI-RS, reduced feedback, 3D-GS rendering) depends on the assumption that the effective rank r in h ≈ U_r g grows sublinearly in the port count N_t, so that the N_t/r overhead saving 'widens along the E-MIMO trajectory.' The evidence cited in Sec. II-B comes from 32- and 128-element dual-band measurements and ray tracing; for 768–1024 elements the text explicitly states that 'the covariance at this scale calls for further measurement and analysis.' Moreover, Sec. II-B also reports that outdoors the rank 'is maintained or even increases' under equal-aperture scaling, which is at least compatible with r growing nearly as fast as N_t. If r ~ N_t at 256+ ports, then Eq. (8)'s floor ε_r cannot be held below 1/ρ at operating SNR without taking r ≈ N_t, and the claimed overhead savings disappear. This is a load-bearing premise for the paper's most
  2. [Sec. III, Fig. 2, Table II] The quantitative coverage study is based on a single ray-tracing environment (Herald Square) with no confidence intervals, and the PDSCH median of -37.7 dB is produced by a deliberately unoptimized baseline (random scheduling, block-diagonalization precoding, imperfect CSI). The text does include a caveat, but Fig. 2(b) and the associated discussion still present the PDSCH number as evidence of channel-dependent coverage loss. Since the specific median is not an equal-aperture bound, the paper should either add error bars and at least a second environment, or clearly separate the illustrative PDSCH value from the qualitative asymmetry claim. The SSB/CSI-RS medians could support the asymmetry conclusion, but they too would benefit from an uncertainty statement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. VI-D, Eq. (9)] The sentence 'In the receive and transmit DFT bases, we have' appears incomplete before 'Let p denote...'. Please revise for clarity and define the entries of Ŝ(p) before Eq. (10) is used.
  2. [Sec. VI-D, Fig. 9] The 3D-GS comparison does not state the number of training locations, Gaussian primitives, hyperparameters, or the baseline sweep policy (all N_r N_t pairs vs. hierarchical). Without these, 'approaches the upper bound' is hard to assess. At minimum, add a comparison to a simple spatial-interpolation baseline such as nearest-neighbor or kriging of beamspace profiles.
  3. [Sec. IV-C, Fig. 7] The spectral- and energy-efficiency tradeoff curves in Fig. 7 have no simulation settings, channel model, number of users, or baseline definitions. As an illustrative reproduction of [49] this is acceptable, but the caption should say so explicitly.
  4. [Sec. III, Table II] The ray-tracing setup would benefit from a statement on ray-tracing configuration (number of reflections, grid resolution, material database) and the number of user drops used for the CDFs. This would support reproducibility of the median values.
  5. [Sec. VI-C, Eq. (8)] The claim that 'at N_t = 256 and r = 8 each bit buys 0.43 dB' is correct under the RVQ scaling, but the choice r = 8 is not justified from the cited measurements. Consider adding a short numerical example based on the eigenvalue profiles in [8] or [30].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central claims rest on external measurements and standard quantization results; self-citations are peripheral building blocks.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing derivations are not circular. The equal-aperture coverage argument is a standard antenna-theory identity (fixed physical aperture gives f^2 array gain that offsets f^2 free-space loss), and the paper validates it with independent NYU measurements and 3GPP models rather than with its own fitted quantities. The CSI-acquisition analysis builds on the Karhunen–Loève projection h ≈ U_r g (Eq. 3) and the standard RVQ quantization bound D ≈ 2^{-B/(d-1)} from [91]; Eq. (8) is a straightforward combination of these external results plus the definition of ε_r, not a restatement of a fitted input. The four 'breakpoints' are supported by physical scaling arguments and by the explicitly labeled illustrative simulation of Fig. 2; the paper itself cautions that the PDSCH result is 'intended to expose the coverage asymmetry rather than to represent an optimized 6G deployment.' The tri-hybrid architecture is adopted from the authors' prior work [49], but it is used as an architectural model with N_rad > N_port ≥ N_RF, not as a 'uniqueness theorem' or as the proof of the central claims; the CSI roadmap does not depend on tri-hybrid hardware. Several other self-citations ([56], [63], [64], [79], [93]) are minor building blocks for specific components (Butler-matrix beamforming, RIS hardware, AI scheduling, beam management) and are not load-bearing for the paper's main argument. The most fragile premise — that the effective rank r grows sublinearly in N_t at 256+ ports — is explicitly acknowledged as needing further data ('The covariance at this scale calls for further measurement and analysis'), which is a scientific limitation, not a circular step. No equation reduces to its own inputs by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and therefore warrants a low circularity score.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are invented. The reconfigurable-aperture concepts (DMA, FAS, tri-hybrid) and the channel-scene renderer are adopted from prior work or are algorithmic constructs, not new physical postulates. The main load-bearing assumptions are the equal-aperture scaling premise and the low-rank FR3 channel assumption, both acknowledged by the authors as partially open.

free parameters (2)
  • Indoor-loss path-loss coefficient (P_Lin = 0.5 d_2D-in) = 0.5
    Ad hoc coefficient in Table II; not derived from 3GPP or the cited measurements. It directly shapes the deep-indoor coverage tail in Fig. 2(a) and the SSB/CSI-RS deficits.
  • 3D-GS scene-fitting hyperparameters (primitive count, splatting/optimization settings) = not reported
    The renderer in Sec. VI-D is fitted to beamspace observations. Without reported hyperparameters, the Fig. 8/9 results are not reproducible and the method's sensitivity is unknown.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Equal-aperture f^2 antenna gain compensates free-space path loss at FR3
    Invoked throughout (Sec. II-A, III) as the basis for claiming 7 GHz can reuse 5G sites. Based on physical aperture scaling and NYU measurements [21],[22], but a modeling assumption about the array, not a proven system-level fact.
  • domain assumption FR3 channel angular/temporal concentration; rank grows sublinearly with port count
    Underpins the CSI-acquisition proposals (Sec. VI, Eq. (3)). The paper cites [8],[21],[30] but explicitly states that covariance at 768-1024 elements "calls for further measurement and analysis" (Sec. II-B).
  • domain assumption Co-located RU site reuse as the evaluation baseline
    Table II and Fig. 2 compare 7 GHz and 3.5 GHz at the same co-located sites. The authors note "The co-located grid is a guideline, not a constraint" (Sec. II-A), so results may not generalize to off-grid deployments.
  • ad hoc to paper Indoor loss model P_Lin = 0.5 d_2D-in
    Table II introduces this linear indoor-loss model with a hand-set coefficient. It is not a standard 3GPP formula and is a free parameter of the coverage simulation.
  • standard math Karhunen-Loève projection and RVQ quantization scaling
    Eq. (3) assumes the KL transform optimally concentrates channel energy; Eq. (6) uses the standard RVQ/CP^{d-1} volume argument from Jindal [91]. These are standard results in information theory.
  • domain assumption Tri-hybrid signal model x_ant = F_ant F_ana F_dig s
    Eq. (1) in Sec. V-B adopts the tri-hybrid architecture abstraction from [49],[83]. The feasibility of the antenna-domain mapping F_ant is hardware-dependent and not established for all realizations.

reviewed 2026-08-03 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of When 5G MIMO Scaling Breaks: Toward 6G Upper-Mid-Band Extreme MIMO." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E2MBGKZE

@misc{pith2026260728965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: When 5G MIMO Scaling Breaks: Toward 6G Upper-Mid-Band Extreme MIMO},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E2MBGKZE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.28965}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The upper-mid band, particularly the 7-8 GHz range within frequency range 3 (FR3), has emerged as a leading spectrum candidate for wide-area sixth-generation (6G) cellular networks. Its shorter wavelength enables hundreds of antenna elements to be integrated within the physical aperture of an existing 5G base-station panel. In principle, the resulting aperture gain can compensate for the increased path loss and enable extreme MIMO (E-MIMO) with 256 or more antenna ports while reusing current cell sites. In practice, however, simply scaling the 5G New Radio (NR) architecture from tens to hundreds of ports encounters fundamental system-level limitations. This paper identifies where 5G-style MIMO scaling breaks and develops a research roadmap for practical upper-mid-band E-MIMO. We first review the evolution of FR3 spectrum, its propagation and channel characteristics, and the emerging 6G system requirements. We then organize the principal challenges into four coupled areas: maintaining effective coverage across all physical channels and protocol states; implementing wideband, energy-efficient RF devices and radio units; developing new low-power array and beamforming architectures; and acquiring sufficiently refined channel state information with manageable sounding and feedback overhead. Representative system studies illustrate the coverage asymmetry between user-specific data transmission and common or channel-acquisition signals, as well as the spectral- and energy-efficiency tradeoffs among fully digital, hybrid, tri-hybrid, dynamic-metasurface, and fluid-antenna architectures. Finally, we discuss how distributed apertures, integrated sensing, AI-assisted channel acquisition, and environment-aware operation can transform fixed-aperture scaling into a deployable 6G E-MIMO architecture.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28965 by Byung-Wook Min, Chan-Byoung Chae, Eui Whan Jin, Geonwoo Park, Jeonghun Park, Jungho Myung, Jun-Seok Ko, Juntaek Han, Kwanghoon Lee, Kwang Soon Kim, Wooram Shin, Young-Jo Ko.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the transition from 5G massive MIMO to deployable upper-mid-band extreme MIMO (E-MIMO). The shorter wavelength at 7–8 GHz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: CDF of the 5G-relative gain at randomly chosen user locations over the Herald Square ray-tracing environment of [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Progression of beamforming architectures from fully digital beamforming and fully analog beamforming to hybrid beamforming structures: (a) fully [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Butler matrix for one- and two-dimensional antenna arrays: (a) a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: General tri-hybrid E-MIMO architecture. (a) The transmitter combines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative hardware implementations of reconfigurable antennas: (a) Varactor controlled metasurface, adapted from [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Architecture-level comparison for a 256-radiating-element transmitter. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the ground-truth and rendered beamspace channel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 9 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    6G: The next hyper-connected experience for all,

    Samsung Research, “6G: The next hyper-connected experience for all,” Samsung, White Paper, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://news.samsu ng.com/global/samsungs-6g-white-paper-lays-out-the-companys-visio n-for-the-next-generation-of-communications-technology

    2020

  2. [2]

    Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,

    ITU-R, “Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,” 2023, recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0, Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/dms pubrec/itu-r/r ec/m/R-REC-M.2160-0-202311-I!!PDF-E.pdf JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2026 21

    2030

  3. [3]

    Enabling 6G performance in the upper mid-band by transitioning from massive to gigantic MIMO,

    E. Bj ¨ornson, F. Kara, N. Kolomvakis, A. Kosasih, P. Ramezani, and M. B. Salman, “Enabling 6G performance in the upper mid-band by transitioning from massive to gigantic MIMO,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 6, pp. 5450–5463, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    6G takes shape,

    J. G. Andrews, T. E. Humphreys, and T. Ji, “6G takes shape,”IEEE BITS Inf. Theory Mag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    World radiocommunication conference 2023 (WRC-23) final acts,

    ITU, “World radiocommunication conference 2023 (WRC-23) final acts,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/pub/R-ACT-WRC .16-2024

    2023

  6. [6]

    New SID: Study on 6G radio,

    3GPP, “New SID: Study on 6G radio,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg ran/TSG RAN/TSGR 108/Docs/RP-251 881.zip

    2025

  7. [7]

    6G air interface: Giga-MIMO and subband full duplex,

    Qualcomm, “6G air interface: Giga-MIMO and subband full duplex,” Qualcomm, Tech. Rep., 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.qualco mm.com/news/onq/2026/01/6g-giga-mimo-subband-full-duplex-ai

    2026

  8. [8]

    Measurement-based massive MIMO channel characteri- zation and performance evaluation at FR3 (8 and 15 GHz) under equal physical aperture,

    E. Liuet al., “Measurement-based massive MIMO channel characteri- zation and performance evaluation at FR3 (8 and 15 GHz) under equal physical aperture,” 2026, arXiv:2604.15680

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Chair’s summary of the 3GPP workshop on 6G,

    3GPP, “Chair’s summary of the 3GPP workshop on 6G,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/workshop/2025-03-10 3 GPP 6G WS/Docs/6GWS-250238.zip

    2025

  10. [10]

    6G wireless channel measurements and models: Trends and challenges,

    C.-X. Wang, J. Huang, H. Wang, X. Gao, X. You, and Y . Hao, “6G wireless channel measurements and models: Trends and challenges,” IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 22–32, 2020

    2020

  11. [11]

    NR; 7–24 GHz frequency range,

    3GPP, “NR; 7–24 GHz frequency range,” 3GPP, Tech. Rep. TR 38.820, 2021, release 16, V16.1.0. [Online]. Available: https: //www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38 series/38.820/

    2021

  12. [12]

    New spectrum,

    K. Zeng and G. Wang, “New spectrum,” in6G: The Next Horizon— From Connected People and Things to Connected Intelligence, W. Tong and P. Zhu, Eds. Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021, ch. 12, pp. 146–157

    2021

  13. [13]

    6G spectrum: Expanding the frontier,

    Samsung Research, “6G spectrum: Expanding the frontier,” Samsung, White Paper, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://news.samsung.com/globa l/samsung-unveils-6g-spectrum-white-paper-and-6g-research-findings

    2022

  14. [14]

    6G spectrum: Enabling the future mobile life beyond 2030,

    Ericsson, “6G spectrum: Enabling the future mobile life beyond 2030,” White Paper, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.ericsson.com/495 3b8/assets/local/reports-papers/white-papers/6g-spectrum.pdf

    2030

  15. [15]

    5G mid-band spectrum needs: Vision 2030,

    GSMA, “5G mid-band spectrum needs: Vision 2030,” GSMA, Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.gsma.com/connectivity-f or-good/spectrum/gsma resources/5g-mid-band-spectrum-needs-visio n-2030/

    2030

  16. [16]

    Cellular wireless networks in the upper mid-band,

    S. Kang, M. Mezzavilla, S. Ranganet al., “Cellular wireless networks in the upper mid-band,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 2058– 2075, 2024

    2058

  17. [17]

    6G wireless communications in 7–24 GHz band: Opportunities, techniques, and challenges,

    Z. Cui, P. Zhang, and S. Pollin, “6G wireless communications in 7–24 GHz band: Opportunities, techniques, and challenges,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Dyn. Spectr. Access Netw. (DySPAN), 2025, pp. 1–8

    2025

  18. [18]

    Extreme massive MIMO for macro cell capacity boost in 5G-Advanced and 6G,

    H. Holma, P. Mogensen, and H. Viswanathan, “Extreme massive MIMO for macro cell capacity boost in 5G-Advanced and 6G,” Nokia Bell Labs, White Paper, 2021. [Online]. Available: https: //www.nokia.com/asset/i/210786/

    2021

  19. [19]

    Coverage evaluation of 7–15 GHz bands from existing sites,

    F. Chaves, D. Chizhik, J. Du, A. Ghosh, B. Love, and E. Visotsky, “Coverage evaluation of 7–15 GHz bands from existing sites,” Nokia, White Paper, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.nokia.com/asset/i/ 213702/

    2024

  20. [20]

    Huawei launches comprehensive U6GHz portfolio to unlock 5G-A potential and pave the way for 6G,

    Huawei, “Huawei launches comprehensive U6GHz portfolio to unlock 5G-A potential and pave the way for 6G,” Mar. 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.huawei.com/en/news/2026/3/mwc-5ga-u6ghz-6g

    2026

  21. [21]

    Comprehensive FR1(C) and FR3 lower and upper mid-band propagation and material penetration loss measurements and channel models in indoor environment for 5G and 6G,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, H. Poddar, P. Ma, Y . Wang, and I. Al-Wazani, “Comprehensive FR1(C) and FR3 lower and upper mid-band propagation and material penetration loss measurements and channel models in indoor environment for 5G and 6G,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 5, pp. 5192–5218, 2024

    2024

  22. [22]

    Urban outdoor propagation measurements and channel models at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 upper mid-band spectrum for 5G and 6G,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaportet al., “Urban outdoor propagation measurements and channel models at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 upper mid-band spectrum for 5G and 6G,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Overview of 3GPP release 19 study on channel modeling enhancements to TR 38.901 for 6G,

    H. Poddar, D. Gold, D. Lee, N. Zhang, G. Sridharan, H. Asplund, and M. Shafi, “Overview of 3GPP release 19 study on channel modeling enhancements to TR 38.901 for 6G,” July 2025, arXiv:2507.19266

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Searching for 6G at MWC,

    K. Dyer, “Searching for 6G at MWC,” Mar. 2025, The Mobile Network. [Online]. Available: https://the-mobile-network.com/2025/03 /searching-for-6g-at-mwc/

    2025

  25. [25]

    ZTE launches GigaMIMO: AI-native wireless empowers human-agent synergy,

    ZTE and China Mobile, “ZTE launches GigaMIMO: AI-native wireless empowers human-agent synergy,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.zte.com.cn/global/about/news/ZTE-Launches-GigaMIM O-AI-Native-Wireless-Empowers-Human-Agent-Synergy.html

    2026

  26. [26]

    Extreme-MIMO field trials in 7 GHz band: Unlocking the potential of new spectrum for 6G,

    S. Lee, J. Yoon, S. Jung, Y .-H. Nam, G. Xu, C.-B. Chae, J. Lee, and J. Zhang, “Extreme-MIMO field trials in 7 GHz band: Unlocking the potential of new spectrum for 6G,” 2026, arXiv:2603.21632

    arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Upper mid-band spectrum for 6G: Vision, opportunity and challenges,

    A. Bazzi, R. Bomfin, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, T. Rappaport, and M. Chafii, “Upper mid-band spectrum for 6G: Vision, opportunity and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 206–212, 2026

    2026

  28. [28]

    Capacity and power consumption of multi-layer 6G networks using the upper mid-band,

    D. L ´opez-P´erez, N. Piovesan, and G. Geraci, “Capacity and power consumption of multi-layer 6G networks using the upper mid-band,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Upper mid-band channel measurements and characterization at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 in an indoor factory scenario,

    M. Ying, D. Shakya, T. S. Rappaport, P. Ma, Y . Wang, I. Al-Wazani, Y . Wu, and H. Poddar, “Upper mid-band channel measurements and characterization at 6.75 GHz FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz FR3 in an indoor factory scenario,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. (ICC), 2025

    2025

  30. [30]

    Site- specific and frequency-dependent channel characterization and MIMO performance in FR3,

    Z. Cui, R. Chattopadhyay, E. Vanspranghels, and S. Pollin, “Site- specific and frequency-dependent channel characterization and MIMO performance in FR3,” 2026, arXiv:2601.02903

    arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    Near-field propagation and spatial non-stationarity channel model for 6–24 GHz (FR3) extremely large-scale MIMO: Adopted by 3GPP for 6G,

    H. Xu, J. Zhang, P. Tang, H. Xing, H. Miaoet al., “Near-field propagation and spatial non-stationarity channel model for 6–24 GHz (FR3) extremely large-scale MIMO: Adopted by 3GPP for 6G,” 2025, arXiv:2506.17887

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    AI-RAN: Transforming the wireless network into a platform for distributed edge AI computing,

    NVIDIA, “AI-RAN: Transforming the wireless network into a platform for distributed edge AI computing,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/industries/telecommunications/ai-ran/

    2026

  33. [33]

    NET4AI: Supporting AI as a service in 6G,

    X. Li, H. Zhang, C. Peng, Z. Liu, and F. Wang, “NET4AI: Supporting AI as a service in 6G,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.huawei.com/en/huaweitech/future-technologies/net4ai-sup porting-ai-as-a-sevice-6g

    2022

  34. [34]

    NVIDIA and global telecom leaders commit to build 6G on open and secure AI-Native platforms,

    NVIDIA, “NVIDIA and global telecom leaders commit to build 6G on open and secure AI-Native platforms,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-and-global-telecom-leaders -commit-to-build-6g-on-open-and-secure-ai-native-platforms

    2026

  35. [35]

    AI-Native & Sustainable Communication,

    Samsung Research, “AI-Native & Sustainable Communication,” Samsung Electronics, White Paper, Feb. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://cdn.codeground.org/nsr/downloads/researchareas/Samsung 6G Vision 2025.pdf

    2025

  36. [36]

    Toward a 6G AI-native air interface,

    J. Hoydis, F. Ait Aoudia, A. Valcarce, and H. Viswanathan, “Toward a 6G AI-native air interface,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 76–81, 2021

    2021

  37. [37]

    6G cellular networks: Mapping the landscape for the IMT-2030 framework,

    E. Hossain and A. Vera-Rivera, “6G cellular networks: Mapping the landscape for the IMT-2030 framework,” 2025, arXiv:2501.14552

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2030

  38. [38]

    Hybrid satellite-UA V- terrestrial networks for 6G ubiquitous coverage: A maritime communi- cations perspective,

    Y . Wang, W. Feng, J. Wang, and T. Q. S. Quek, “Hybrid satellite-UA V- terrestrial networks for 6G ubiquitous coverage: A maritime communi- cations perspective,” 2021, arXiv:2104.12077

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    NVIDIA and US telecom leaders unveil the all-american AI-RAN stack to accelerate the path to 6G,

    NVIDIA, “NVIDIA and US telecom leaders unveil the all-american AI-RAN stack to accelerate the path to 6G,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-us-telecom-ai-ran-6g

    2025

  40. [40]

    5G new radio for public safety mission critical communications,

    J. Li, K. K. Nagalapur, E. Stare, S. Dwivedi, S. A. Ashraf, P.-E. Eriksson, U. Engstr¨om, W.-H. Lee, and T. Lohmar, “5G new radio for public safety mission critical communications,” 2021, arXiv:2103.02434

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    NR; physical layer procedures for data,

    3GPP, “NR; physical layer procedures for data,” 3GPP, Tech. Spec. TS 38.214, 2026, release 19, V19.4.0 (Jun. 2026). [Online]. Available: https://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38 series/38.214/

    2026

  42. [42]

    Fast beam training with true-time-delay arrays in wideband millimeter-wave systems,

    V . Boljanovic, H. Yan, C.-C. Lin, S. Mohapatra, D. Heo, S. Gupta, and D. Cabric, “Fast beam training with true-time-delay arrays in wideband millimeter-wave systems,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1727–1739, 2021

    2021

  43. [43]

    Reciprocity calibration for massive MIMO: Proposal, modeling, and validation,

    J. Vieira, F. Rusek, O. Edfors, S. Malkowsky, L. Liu, and F. Tufvesson, “Reciprocity calibration for massive MIMO: Proposal, modeling, and validation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 3042– 3056, 2017

    2017

  44. [44]

    Digital predistortion for hybrid MIMO transmitters,

    M. Abdelaziz, L. Anttila, A. Brihuega, F. Tufvesson, and M. Valkama, “Digital predistortion for hybrid MIMO transmitters,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 445–454, 2018

    2018

  45. [45]

    Linearity and efficiency in 5G transmitters: New techniques for analyzing efficiency, linearity, and linearization in a 5G active antenna transmitter context,

    C. Fager, T. Eriksson, F. Barradas, K. Hausmair, T. Cunha, and J. C. Pedro, “Linearity and efficiency in 5G transmitters: New techniques for analyzing efficiency, linearity, and linearization in a 5G active antenna transmitter context,”IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 35–49, 2019

    2019

  46. [46]

    Full-duplex radio/radar technology: The enabler for advanced joint communication and sensing,

    C. B. Barneto, S. D. Liyanaarachchi, M. Heino, T. Riihonen, and M. Valkama, “Full-duplex radio/radar technology: The enabler for advanced joint communication and sensing,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 82–88, 2021

    2021

  47. [47]

    Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,

    F. Liu, Y . Cui, C. Masouros, J. Xu, T. X. Han, Y . C. Eldar, and S. Buzzi, “Integrated sensing and communications: Toward dual-functional wire- less networks for 6G and beyond,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1728–1767, 2022. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2026 22

    2022

  48. [48]

    A parametric power model of upper mid-band (FR3) base stations for 6G,

    E. Peschiera, S. Yun, Y . Lee, L. Van der Perre, and F. Rottenberg, “A parametric power model of upper mid-band (FR3) base stations for 6G,” 2025, arXiv:2510.10647

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Embrac- ing reconfigurable antennas in the tri-hybrid MIMO architecture for 6G and beyond,

    M. R. Castellanos, S. Yang, C.-B. Chae, and R. W. Heath, Jr., “Embrac- ing reconfigurable antennas in the tri-hybrid MIMO architecture for 6G and beyond,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 381–401, 2026

    2026

  50. [50]

    Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme massive MIMO communications,

    N. Shlezinger, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. F. Imani, Y . C. Eldar, and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme massive MIMO communications,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2021

    2021

  51. [51]

    Hybrid architectures with few-bit ADC receivers: Achievable rates and energy- rate tradeoffs,

    J. Mo, A. Alkhateeb, S. Abu-Surra, and R. W. Heath, Jr., “Hybrid architectures with few-bit ADC receivers: Achievable rates and energy- rate tradeoffs,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2274– 2287, 2017

    2017

  52. [52]

    Scalable cell-free massive MIMO systems,

    E. Bj ¨ornson and L. Sanguinetti, “Scalable cell-free massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 68, no. 7, pp. 4247–4261, 2020

    2020

  53. [53]

    Joint spatial division and multiplexing—the large-scale array regime,

    A. Adhikary, J. Nam, J.-Y . Ahn, and G. Caire, “Joint spatial division and multiplexing—the large-scale array regime,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 59, no. 10, pp. 6441–6463, Oct. 2013

    2013

  54. [54]

    A partial reciprocity- based channel prediction framework for FDD massive MIMO with high mobility,

    Z. Qin, H. Yin, Y . Cao, W. Li, and D. Gesbert, “A partial reciprocity- based channel prediction framework for FDD massive MIMO with high mobility,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 9638– 9652, 2022

    2022

  55. [55]

    Deep learning for massive MIMO CSI feedback,

    C.-K. Wen, W.-T. Shih, and S. Jin, “Deep learning for massive MIMO CSI feedback,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 748–751, 2018

    2018

  56. [56]

    AI-integrated extreme massive MIMO schedul- ing for hyper reliable low-latency communication,

    J. Kim and K. S. Kim, “AI-integrated extreme massive MIMO schedul- ing for hyper reliable low-latency communication,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1426–1430, 2025

    2025

  57. [57]

    Wideband penetration loss through building materials and partitions at 6.75 GHz in FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz in the FR3 upper mid- band spectrum,

    D. Shakya, M. Ying, T. S. Rappaport, H. Poddar, P. Ma, Y . Wang, and I. Al-Wazani, “Wideband penetration loss through building materials and partitions at 6.75 GHz in FR1(C) and 16.95 GHz in the FR3 upper mid- band spectrum,” inProc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), 2024, pp. 1665–1670

    2024

  58. [58]

    Radio propagation into modern buildings: Attenuation measurements in the range from 800 MHz to 18 GHz,

    I. Rodriguez, H. C. Nguyen, N. T. K. Jørgensen, T. B. Sørensen, and P. Mogensen, “Radio propagation into modern buildings: Attenuation measurements in the range from 800 MHz to 18 GHz,” inProc. IEEE Veh. Technol. Conf. (VTC) Fall, 2014, pp. 1–5

    2014

  59. [59]

    Frequency-adaptive multi- band architecture for upper mid-band MIMO systems,

    E. Vanspranghels, Z. Cui, and S. Pollin, “Frequency-adaptive multi- band architecture for upper mid-band MIMO systems,” 2026, arXiv:2601.07489

    arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,

    H. Tataria, M. Shafi, A. F. Molisch, M. Dohler, H. Sj ¨oland, and F. Tufvesson, “6G wireless systems: Vision, requirements, challenges, insights, and opportunities,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 7, pp. 1166–1199, 2021

    2021

  61. [61]

    A survey on hybrid beamforming techniques in 5G: Architecture and system model perspectives,

    I. Ahmed, H. Khammari, A. Shahid, A. Musa, K. S. Kim, E. De Poorter, and I. Moerman, “A survey on hybrid beamforming techniques in 5G: Architecture and system model perspectives,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 3060–3097, 2018

    2018

  62. [62]

    Beam-forming matrix simplifies design of electronically scanned antennas,

    J. Butler and R. Lowe, “Beam-forming matrix simplifies design of electronically scanned antennas,”Electronic Design, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 170–173, 1961

    1961

  63. [63]

    A Ka-band bi-directional reconfigurable switched beam-forming network based on 4 × 4 Butler matrix in 28- nm CMOS,

    Y . Lee, B. Suh, and B.-W. Min, “A Ka-band bi-directional reconfigurable switched beam-forming network based on 4 × 4 Butler matrix in 28- nm CMOS,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 2479–2487, 2023

    2023

  64. [64]

    RF lens-embedded massive MIMO systems: Fabrication issues and codebook design,

    T. Kwon, Y .-G. Lim, B.-W. Min, and C.-B. Chae, “RF lens-embedded massive MIMO systems: Fabrication issues and codebook design,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 2256–2271, 2016

    2016

  65. [65]

    Digital predistortion of 5G massive MIMO wireless transmitters based on indirect identification of power amplifier behavior with OTA tests,

    X. Wang, Y . Li, C. Yu, W. Hong, and A. Zhu, “Digital predistortion of 5G massive MIMO wireless transmitters based on indirect identification of power amplifier behavior with OTA tests,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 316–328, Jan. 2020

    2020

  66. [66]

    Digital predistortion of RF power amplifiers with phase-gated recurrent neural networks,

    T. Kobal, Y . Li, X. Wang, and A. Zhu, “Digital predistortion of RF power amplifiers with phase-gated recurrent neural networks,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 3291–3299, June 2022

    2022

  67. [67]

    A review of hybrid supply modulators in CMOS technologies for envelope tracking PAs,

    S. Bhardwaj, S. Moallemi, and J. Kitchen, “A review of hybrid supply modulators in CMOS technologies for envelope tracking PAs,”IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 6036–6062, May 2023

    2023

  68. [68]

    Hsu, Z.-Y

    Y .-T. Hsu, Z.-Y . Lin, J.-J. Lee, and K.-H. Chen, “An envelope tracking supply modulator utilizing a GaN-based integrated four-phase switching converter and average power tracking-based switch sizing with 85.7% efficiency for 5G NR power amplifier,”IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 3167–3176, Oct. 2021

    2021

  69. [69]

    Not just a phase: Outphasing power amplifiers,

    T. Barton, “Not just a phase: Outphasing power amplifiers,”IEEE Microw. Mag., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 18–31, Feb. 2016

    2016

  70. [70]

    A 30-GHz CMOS SOI outphasing power amplifier with current mode combining for high backoff efficiency and constant envelope operation,

    K. Ning, Y . Fang, N. Hosseinzadeh, and J. F. Buckwalter, “A 30-GHz CMOS SOI outphasing power amplifier with current mode combining for high backoff efficiency and constant envelope operation,”IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1411–1421, May 2020

    2020

  71. [71]

    A digitally modulated polar CMOS power amplifier with a 20-MHz channel bandwidth,

    A. Kavousian, D. K. Su, M. Hekmat, A. Shirvani, and B. A. Wooley, “A digitally modulated polar CMOS power amplifier with a 20-MHz channel bandwidth,”IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2251–2258, Oct. 2008

    2008

  72. [72]

    A fully-integrated wideband digital polar transmitter with 11-bit digital-to-phase converter in 40nm CMOS,

    C. Hu, Y . Yin, T. Li, Y . Liu, L. Xiong, and H. Xu, “A fully-integrated wideband digital polar transmitter with 11-bit digital-to-phase converter in 40nm CMOS,”IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 462– 473, Feb. 2023

    2023

  73. [73]

    The Doherty power amplifier: Review of recent solutions and trends,

    V . Camarchia, M. Pirola, R. Quaglia, S. Jee, Y . Cho, and B. Kim, “The Doherty power amplifier: Review of recent solutions and trends,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 559–571, Feb. 2015

    2015

  74. [74]

    Single transformer-based compact doherty power amplifiers for 5G RF phased-array ICs,

    H.-C. Park, S. Kim, J. Lee, J. Jung, S. Baek, T. Kim, D. Kang, D. Minn, and S.-G. Yang, “Single transformer-based compact doherty power amplifiers for 5G RF phased-array ICs,”IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1267–1279, May 2022

    2022

  75. [75]

    Interference management for full-duplex ISAC in B5G/6G networks: Architectures, challenges, and solutions,

    A. Tang, X. Wang, and J. A. Zhang, “Interference management for full-duplex ISAC in B5G/6G networks: Architectures, challenges, and solutions,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 20–26, 2024

    2024

  76. [76]

    A 28-GHz full- duplex phased array front-end using two cross-polarized arrays and a canceller,

    K. Park, J. Myeong, G. M. Rebeiz, and B.-W. Min, “A 28-GHz full- duplex phased array front-end using two cross-polarized arrays and a canceller,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn., vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 1127– 1135, 2021

    2021

  77. [77]

    Wideband RF self-interference can- cellation with three taps using trigonometric frequency-domain padding method,

    G. Yang, H.-J. Cho, and B.-W. Min, “Wideband RF self-interference can- cellation with three taps using trigonometric frequency-domain padding method,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 12 081 – 12 095, 2026

    2026

  78. [78]

    Integrated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,

    R. Liu, M. Li, H. Luo, Q. Liu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Integrated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,”IEEE Wireless Com- mun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2023

    2023

  79. [79]

    Scalable 32 × 32 1-bit reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces for upper-mid band 6G communications,

    S. Kim, H.-S. Choi, and B.-W. Min, “Scalable 32 × 32 1-bit reconfig- urable intelligent surfaces for upper-mid band 6G communications,” in Proc. IEEE/MTT-S Int Microw. Symp., 2024, pp. 919–922

    2024

  80. [80]

    Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,

    H. Q. Ngo, A. Ashikhmin, H. Yang, E. G. Larsson, and T. L. Marzetta, “Cell-free massive MIMO versus small cells,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1834–1850, Mar. 2017

    2017

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 3, 2026.