On the Emergence of Exponential Decay from Discrete Spectra for Friedrichs Hamiltonians

S\"oren Petrat; Tamim Al-Qaiwani

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 27 references

On the Emergence of Exponential Decay from Discrete Spectra for Friedrichs Hamiltonians

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-03 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For Friedrichs Hamiltonians with purely discrete bath spectra, exponential decay at the Fermi golden rule rate emerges in the weak-coupling limit provided the level spacing is far smaller than the resonance width µ².

desk verdict The finite-volume exponential decay theorem is solid and worth refereeing; the claimed sharp β=1/2 threshold is not proven — the t-uniform bound in the β>1/2 case does not follow from the contour estimate. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.29485 v1 pith:Z75SQRVY submitted 2026-07-31 math-ph math.MPquant-ph

Tamim Al-Qaiwani , Sören Petrat This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.MPquant-ph MSC 81Q1081Q1547A55

keywords FriedrichsHamiltoniansexponentialdecayFermi'sgoldenrulediscretespectrumLévydistanceweak-couplinglimitsurvivalprobabilityspin-bosonmodel

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Physically, an excited atom should decay even when its radiation field is confined to a finite cavity, where the spectrum is a discrete ladder that becomes denser as the cavity grows. This paper proves that for the class of rank-one Friedrichs Hamiltonians such decay is indeed exponential on the Fermi time scale: the survival probability is close to e^{-2µ²Γt} with Γ the Fermi golden rule rate computed from the limiting spectral density, provided the discrete levels are much more closely spaced than the coupling-induced resonance width. The proof yields a quantitative error bound controlled by the Lévy distance between the discrete spectral measure and its continuous limit, and it identifies the scale separation d ≪ ε ≪ µ² required for the approximation to work. A concrete application shows that a two-level atom in a large cavity, in the rotating-wave approximation, undergoes exponential decay when the coupling decreases slower than L^{-1/2} as the cavity grows.

What carries the argument

The argument turns on the self-energy Σ_L(E+iε)=⟨g_L,(K_L-E-iε)^{-1}g_L⟩ and the exact identity for the Cauchy-smeared spectral density: (p_ε * σ_μ^L)(E) = (1/π) Im[(E0 - E - iε - µ²Σ_L(E+iε))^{-1}]. This reduces the problem to controlling two regularity facts: the self-energy is Hölder continuous up to an error d/ε, and its value approaches Δ(E0)+iπρ_∞(E0) with error d/ε + ε^α. The smearing scale ε is chosen to be d µ^{-2γ}, which lies in the window d ≪ ε ≪ µ². In that window the smeared density is close in L¹ to a Lorentzian with centre E0-µ²Δ and width ε+µ²Γ, whose Fourier transform is the exponential decay law. The distribution of scales — spacing d, smearing ε, resonance width µ² — is t

What would settle it

Take a Friedrichs Hamiltonian satisfying (Aα), choose µ_L = d(ν_L,ν_∞)^{0.4}, and compute the survival amplitude at rescaled time τ=1 (i.e., t=1/µ_L²) for increasing L; the theorem says this converges to exp(iΔ(E0)-Γ(E0)) with Γ(E0)=πρ_∞(E0). If the computed limit deviates from this, the central claim is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a quantitative theorem: for sequences of Friedrichs Hamiltonians whose bath spectral measures converge weakly to an absolutely continuous measure with Hölder continuous density near E0, the survival amplitude equals e^{-i(E0-µ²Δ(E0))t} e^{-µ²Γ(E0)t} plus an error bounded by C(γ)(µ^{2γ} + (d/µ²)^α) exp(d/µ^{2γ} t), where Γ(E0)=πρ_∞(E0) is the Fermi golden rule rate, Δ(E0) the energy shift, and d the Lévy distance between discrete and limiting measures. If d ≪ µ², the error is small up to times ~µ^{-2}, and in the simultaneous weak-coupling/continuum limit the decay becomes exactly exponential. The proof uses a Cauchy-smearing scale ε with d ≪ ε ≪ µ² to turn the discrete s

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands or falls on the assumption that the discrete spectral measures approach a Hölder-regular absolutely continuous measure fast enough that the typical level spacing d is much smaller than the coupling-induced resonance width µ²; if this scale separation fails, the error term (d/µ²)^α is not small and the Lorentzian approximation breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For the confined spin-boson model with coupling µ_L = L^{-β}, exponential decay with rate Γ(E0)=πρ_∞(E0) occurs for β<1/2; for β>1/2 the survival amplitude instead tends to 1 (the state fails to decay).
The error bound grows exponentially in time, implying that for any finite cavity the exponential law must eventually fail — a quantitative signature of Poincaré recurrences.
The theorem recovers, as a special case, the known uniform-in-time estimates for Friedrichs Hamiltonians with absolutely continuous spectrum, and extends them to discrete-but-dense spectra.
The result supplies a finite-volume justification of the Fermi golden rule for the confined spin-boson model and, by the same mechanism, for other finite-volume models of metastability before any thermodynamic limit is taken.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This suggests a practical design rule for cavity experiments: exponential decay is observable only when the coupling-induced resonance width exceeds the typical cavity level spacing, so tuning µ or L to enter this regime should be possible.
The unprobed borderline β=1/2, where level spacing and resonance width are of the same order, likely hosts a crossover to non-exponential decay; numerical study of this boundary could reveal universal scaling.
The Cauchy-smearing method could be pushed beyond leading order: keeping higher-order terms in the self-energy would give quantitative corrections to the decay law and energy shift at stronger coupling, and the same machinery might handle multi-level atoms.
Since only the Lévy distance controls the error, the result should extend to disordered or quasiperiodic level sequences whose distribution functions converge uniformly; testing such sequences would probe how robust the emergent exponential decay is.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The main result of this paper is the approximate exponential decay theorem for sequences of Friedrichs Hamiltonians with discrete spectra, with error controlled by Lévy distance. That part looks right to me. The proof via Cauchy-smearing and self-energy regularity is coherent, and the paper is careful to note the error has to grow in time because of Poincaré recurrences. The extension of Jensen–Nenciu to the finite-volume setting is genuinely new, and the spin-boson application with the β<1/2 condition is a clean corollary. The derivation of the spectral density for the cavity model is also a solid piece of work.

The soft spot is the β>1/2 case of Theorem 4.1. The argument chooses a contour γ(L) of radius O(1), bounds |Σ_L(z)|≤CL, then claims a t-uniform bound of order L^{1−2β} for the contour integral. That does not follow. On the arc with Im z>0, |e^{-itz}|=e^{t Im z} grows in t, so pointwise control of the integrand gives nothing uniform in t. And the contour encloses real axis points of σ(K_L), so you cannot deform to the lower half-plane without picking up residues with t-dependent phases. My reading is that the no-decay threshold β=1/2 is unsupported. The stress-test note correctly identifies this. It doesn't affect Theorem 1.1 or Corollary 1.1, but the 'sharp threshold' claim should be fixed or removed.

Two smaller things. Theorem 1.1 states 'for all μ≥0', but μ=0 is not covered because d(ν_L,ν_∞)/μ^2 is undefined; restricting to μ>0 is harmless. Also, the proof of Theorem 1.1 only imposes d/μ^2

Overall, this is a serious paper. The main theorem and the cavity density computation deserve a referee. The β>1/2 claim should not be accepted without a fix. I would send it to review with a request to repair or remove that part.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies Friedrichs Hamiltonians whose bath spectral measures are discrete but converge weakly to an absolutely continuous limit with Hölder density. Theorem 1.1 asserts that the survival amplitude of the excited state is approximately exponential at rate Γ(E0)=πρ∞(E0) and energy shift Δ(E0), with an error expressed through the coupling μ, the Hölder exponent α, and the Lévy distance d(ν_L,ν∞). Corollary 1.1 derives a simultaneous weak-coupling/large-volume (van Hove) limit for μ_L=d(ν_L,ν∞)^β, β<1/2. Section 4 applies this to the rotating-wave confined spin-boson model, with Lemma 4.1 supplying quantitative convergence of the spectral measures and Theorem 4.1 claiming exponential decay for β<1/2 but no decay (amplitude 1) for β>1/2.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, it gives a rigorous finite-volume mechanism for the emergence of exponential decay before taking the thermodynamic limit, with explicit error estimates in terms of the Lévy distance and no fitted parameters. The proof strategy—smearing the spectral measure by a Cauchy kernel, then comparing the resulting density to a Lorentzian via self-energy regularity—is natural and largely self-contained. Lemma 4.1 provides an explicit O(L^{-1}) Lévy-distance bound for the spin-boson application, which is a useful quantitative result. Theorem 1.1 and the existence part of Corollary 1.1 appear coherent and are nontrivial. The main weakness is the β>1/2 branch of Theorem 4.1, which is used to claim a sharp threshold and is supported by an unjustified contour estimate.

major comments (2)

[Theorem 4.1, β∈(1/2,∞) case, after Eq. (4.6)] The estimate |⟨χ,e^{-itH_L(μ_L)}P_Lχ⟩−e^{-itE0}|≤C_4 L^{1−2β} is asserted to be uniform in t from the contour representation, but this does not follow. On γ(L) with Im z>0, |e^{-itz}|=e^{t Im z}=e^{O(1)t}; at t=τ μ_L^{-2}=τ L^{2β} this factor is enormous. Moreover, P_Lχ is not an eigenvector with eigenvalue E0, so replacing e^{-itH_L}P_Lχ by e^{-itE0} is unjustified. In fact, for μ_L≪d(ν_L,ν∞), second-order perturbation theory gives an eigenvalue shift μ_L^2 Re Σ_L(E0)+O(μ_L^4), so at t=τ μ_L^{-2} the amplitude acquires a phase e^{-iτ Re Σ_L(E0)} → e^{iΔ(E0)τ}, not 1. Thus the claimed β>1/2 branch and the 'sharp threshold' statement in the introduction are unsupported and appear incorrect.
[Corollary 1.1 and Theorem 4.1, β∈(0,1/2) rate] The stated rate d^{min{2βα_-,(1−2β)α_-}} does not follow from Theorem 1.1 for all β<1/2 and all α_-<α. Substituting μ_L=d^β and t=τ μ_L^{-2} into (1.11) with γ=α_- gives the factor exp(τ d^{1−2β(1+α_-)}). This diverges unless 1−2β(1+α_-)≥0, i.e. β≤1/(2(1+α_-)). For β close to 1/2 and α_- not sufficiently small, the estimate is not a consequence of the stated theorem. The existence part of the limit can be recovered by taking γ small, but the 'moreover' rate claim and its use in Theorem 4.1 require a separate argument or a restricted parameter range.

minor comments (3)

[Eq. (1.16) and surrounding text] Notation for the Fourier transform is inconsistent: the text writes \hat p_ε(t) but the displayed equation uses bpε(t); the decay e^{-ε|t|} should be stated as the Fourier transform of the Cauchy kernel.
[Lemma 4.1] Spell 'Poincaré' consistently; the current 'Poincare' appears in a proof relying on the standard inequality.
[Theorem 4.1] The sequence ε_L is introduced with values in (1/2,3/2) but the notation is then reused for the contour γ(L); clarify that the radius is ε_L and avoid conflict with the smearing scale ε from Section 3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the decay formula is derived from assumed spectral convergence, not assumed as an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is conditional but self-contained. Assumption (Aα) posits weak convergence of the discrete spectral measures ν_L to an absolutely continuous ν∞ with Hölder density; Theorem 1.1 then derives, rather than assumes, the survival amplitude formula (1.10). The rate Γ(E0)=πρ∞(E0) and shift Δ(E0) are computed from ν∞, but they are not fitted to the survival probability; the target amplitude is obtained from the exact resolvent identity in Lemma 3.1 (Eq. (3.2)) and then bounded via the regularity lemmas. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no result is imported from the authors' own prior work: the cited continuum results ([17], [19], [20]) are external and independent. The assumption that ν∞ has nonzero Hölder-continuous density near E0 is a genuine premise, not a restatement of exponential decay; the conclusion concerns the survival amplitude in the finite-volume, weak-coupling regime and gives explicit quantitative errors in terms of d(ν_L,ν∞) and μ. The β>1/2 contour argument in Theorem 4.1 may raise a separate correctness concern, but that would be a mathematical-rigor issue, not circularity. Accordingly, no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumed Hölder-regular weak limit and on standard functional calculus; no free parameters or invented entities. The application additionally assumes regularity of the coupling function g. These are explicit, physical modeling assumptions rather than hidden fitting.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Assumption (Aα): ν_L → ν∞ weakly; ν∞ absolutely continuous with bounded Hölder-α density; ρ∞(E0)>0
Central modeling assumption used in Lemma 2.1, Lemma 2.2, and Theorem 1.1; encodes 'dense discrete spectrum'.
domain assumption Regular normalized coupling: g_L ∈ K_L with ∥g_L∥=1; in the application g ∈ H^1∩C^1 with decay
Friedrichs Hamiltonian and its spectral representation require g∈K; normalization sets the coupling scale; Assumption (R) in Section 4 gives the surface density.
standard math Standard spectral theorem, functional calculus, Neumann series convergence for bounded perturbations, Cauchy integral formula
Used implicitly in Lemma 3.1 and Theorem 4.1.
domain assumption The contour γ(L) can be drawn with dist(z,σ(K_L))≥cL^{-2} for the lattice model
Proved in Section 4 via lattice spacing estimates; needed for the Neumann-series argument in the β>1/2 case.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Emergence of Exponential Decay from Discrete Spectra for Friedrichs Hamiltonians." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z75SQRVY

@misc{pith2026260729485,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Emergence of Exponential Decay from Discrete Spectra for Friedrichs Hamiltonians},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z75SQRVY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.29485}
}

read the original abstract

We study a class of Friedrichs Hamiltonians, that is, operators describing an excited state coupled to a bath through a rank-one perturbation, in the case where the bath Hamiltonian has purely discrete spectrum. We consider sequences of such Hamiltonians for which the spectral measures associated to the coupling functions by the bath Hamiltonians converge weakly to a limiting measure that is absolutely continuous with a H\"older continuous density near the excited energy. Under this assumption, we show that the survival probability of the excited state decays in an approximately exponential manner on suitable time scales and under favourable conditions, with a decay rate given by Fermi's golden rule for the limiting measure. The error is estimated in terms of the coupling strength and the L\'evy distance between the discrete spectral measures and the limiting measure. As an application, we treat a two-level atom coupled to a massless bosonic field confined to a large cavity in the rotating-wave approximation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references

[1]

A class of analytic perturbations for one-body Schr¨ odinger Hamiltonians

J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes. “A class of analytic perturbations for one-body Schr¨ odinger Hamiltonians”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics22(4), (1971), pp. 269–279

1971
[2]

Existence and construction of resonances for atoms coupled to the quantized radiation field

V. Bach, M. Ballesteros, and A. Pizzo. “Existence and construction of resonances for atoms coupled to the quantized radiation field”. In:Advances in Mathematics314, (2017), pp. 540–572

2017
[3]

Spectral analysis for systems of atoms and molecules coupled to the quantized radiation field

V. Bach, J. Fr¨ ohlich, and I. M. Sigal. “Spectral analysis for systems of atoms and molecules coupled to the quantized radiation field”. In:Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics207(2), (1999), pp. 249–290

1999
[4]

Spectral properties of many-body Schr¨ odinger opera- tors with dilatation-analytic interactions

E. Balslev and J. M. Combes. “Spectral properties of many-body Schr¨ odinger opera- tors with dilatation-analytic interactions”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics 22(4), (1971), pp. 280 –294

1971
[5]

Intramolecular radiationless transitions

M. Bixon and J. Jortner. “Intramolecular radiationless transitions”. In:The Journal of Chemical Physics48(2), (1968), pp. 715–726

1968
[6]

Quantum recurrence theorem

P. Bocchieri and A. Loinger. “Quantum recurrence theorem”. In:Physical Review107(2), (1957), pp. 337–338

1957
[7]

A general resonance theory based on Mourre’s inequality

L. Cattaneo, G. M. Graf, and W. R. Hunziker. “A general resonance theory based on Mourre’s inequality”. In:Annales Henri Poincar´ e7, (2005), pp. 583–601

2005
[8]

Beliaev damping in Bose gas

J. Derezi´ nski, B. Li, and M. Napi´ orkowski. “Beliaev damping in Bose gas”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics191(9), (2024), p. 110

2024

Show all 27 references

[9]

Renormalization of the Friedrichs Hamiltonian

J. Derezi´ nski and R. Fr¨ uboes. “Renormalization of the Friedrichs Hamiltonian”. In: Reports on Mathematical Physics50(3), (2002), pp. 433–438. 18

2002
[10]

Elstrodt.Maß- und Integrationstheorie

J. Elstrodt.Maß- und Integrationstheorie. 8th ed. Springer Spektrum, 2018

2018
[11]

The Friedrichs-Lee model and its singular cou- pling limit

P. Facchi, M. Ligab` o, and D. Lonigro. “The Friedrichs-Lee model and its singular cou- pling limit”. In:Proceedings12(1), (2019)

2019
[12]

Spectral properties of the singular Friedrichs–Lee Hamiltonian

P. Facchi, M. Ligab` o, and D. Lonigro. “Spectral properties of the singular Friedrichs–Lee Hamiltonian”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics62(3), (2021), p. 032102

2021
[13]

On the perturbation of continuous spectra

K. O. Friedrichs. “On the perturbation of continuous spectra”. In:Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics1(4), (1948), pp. 361–406

1948
[14]

The Friedrichs model and its use in resonance phenomena

M. Gadella and G. Pronko. “The Friedrichs model and its use in resonance phenomena”. In:Fortschritte der Physik59(9), (2011), pp. 795–859

2011
[15]

Asymptotic completeness in quantum field theory: Translation Invariant Nelson Type Models Restricted to the Vacuum and One-Particle Sectors

C. G´ erard, J. S. Møller, and M. G. Rasmussen. “Asymptotic completeness in quantum field theory: Translation Invariant Nelson Type Models Restricted to the Vacuum and One-Particle Sectors”. In:Letters in Mathematical Physics95(2), (2011), pp. 109–134

2011
[16]

On the lifetime of quasi-stationary states in non- relativistic QED

D. Hasler, I. Herbst, and M. Huber. “On the lifetime of quasi-stationary states in non- relativistic QED”. In:Annales Henri Poincar´ e9(5), (2008), pp. 1005–1028

2008
[17]

Mathematical theory of the Wigner-Weisskopf atom

V. Jakˇ si´ c, E. Kritchevski, and C.-A. Pillet. “Mathematical theory of the Wigner-Weisskopf atom”. In:Large Coulomb Systems: Lecture Notes on Mathematical Aspects of QED. Ed. by J. Derezi´ nski and H. Siedentop. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 145–215

2006
[18]

Multiple commutator estimates and resolvent smoothness in quantum scattering theory

A. Jensen, E. Mourre, and P. Perry. “Multiple commutator estimates and resolvent smoothness in quantum scattering theory”. en. In:Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique 41(2), (1984), pp. 207–225

1984
[19]

The Fermi Golden Rule and its form at thresholds in odd dimensions

A. Jensen and G. Nenciu. “The Fermi Golden Rule and its form at thresholds in odd dimensions”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics261(3), (2006), pp. 693–727

2006
[20]

Exponential decay near resonance, without analyticity

C. King. “Exponential decay near resonance, without analyticity”. In:Letters in Math- ematical Physics23(3), (1991), pp. 215–222

1991
[21]

Resonant decay of a two state atom interacting with a massless non-relativistic quantised scalar field

C. King. “Resonant decay of a two state atom interacting with a massless non-relativistic quantised scalar field”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics165(3), (1994), pp. 569–594

1994
[22]

Absence of singular continuous spectrum for certain self-adjoint operators

E. Mourre. “Absence of singular continuous spectrum for certain self-adjoint operators”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics78(3), (1981), pp. 391–408

1981
[23]

Complex scaling technique in non-relativistic massive QED

T. Okamoto and K. Yajima. “Complex scaling technique in non-relativistic massive QED”. In:Annales de l’I.H.P. Physique th´ eorique42(3), (1985), pp. 311–327

1985
[24]

Quantum mechanical resonance and limiting absorption: The many body problem

A. Orth. “Quantum mechanical resonance and limiting absorption: The many body problem”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics126(3), (1990), pp. 559–573

1990
[25]

Reed and B

M. Reed and B. Simon.Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics: Fourier Analysis and Self-Adjointness. Academic Press, 1975

1975
[26]

Resonances in n-body quantum systems with dilatation analytic potentials and the foundations of time-dependent perturbation theory

B. Simon. “Resonances in n-body quantum systems with dilatation analytic potentials and the foundations of time-dependent perturbation theory”. In:Annals of Mathematics 97(2), (1973), pp. 247–274

1973
[27]

Quantum-mechanical perturbations giving rise to a statistical transport equation

L. van Hove. “Quantum-mechanical perturbations giving rise to a statistical transport equation”. In:Physica21(1), (1954), pp. 517–540. 19

1954

Pith tools

Reviewed August 3, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

A class of analytic perturbations for one-body Schr¨ odinger Hamiltonians

J. Aguilar and J. M. Combes. “A class of analytic perturbations for one-body Schr¨ odinger Hamiltonians”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics22(4), (1971), pp. 269–279

1971

[2] [2]

Existence and construction of resonances for atoms coupled to the quantized radiation field

V. Bach, M. Ballesteros, and A. Pizzo. “Existence and construction of resonances for atoms coupled to the quantized radiation field”. In:Advances in Mathematics314, (2017), pp. 540–572

2017

[3] [3]

Spectral analysis for systems of atoms and molecules coupled to the quantized radiation field

V. Bach, J. Fr¨ ohlich, and I. M. Sigal. “Spectral analysis for systems of atoms and molecules coupled to the quantized radiation field”. In:Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics207(2), (1999), pp. 249–290

1999

[4] [4]

Spectral properties of many-body Schr¨ odinger opera- tors with dilatation-analytic interactions

E. Balslev and J. M. Combes. “Spectral properties of many-body Schr¨ odinger opera- tors with dilatation-analytic interactions”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics 22(4), (1971), pp. 280 –294

1971

[5] [5]

Intramolecular radiationless transitions

M. Bixon and J. Jortner. “Intramolecular radiationless transitions”. In:The Journal of Chemical Physics48(2), (1968), pp. 715–726

1968

[6] [6]

Quantum recurrence theorem

P. Bocchieri and A. Loinger. “Quantum recurrence theorem”. In:Physical Review107(2), (1957), pp. 337–338

1957

[7] [7]

A general resonance theory based on Mourre’s inequality

L. Cattaneo, G. M. Graf, and W. R. Hunziker. “A general resonance theory based on Mourre’s inequality”. In:Annales Henri Poincar´ e7, (2005), pp. 583–601

2005

[8] [8]

Beliaev damping in Bose gas

J. Derezi´ nski, B. Li, and M. Napi´ orkowski. “Beliaev damping in Bose gas”. In:Journal of Statistical Physics191(9), (2024), p. 110

2024