Suppressed plasmon excitations, enhanced damping and static screening in Kek-Y strained $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$ model

Andrii Iurov; Danhong Huang; Godfrey Gumbs; Jean Marseille; Liubov Zhemchuzhna; Teresa Lee

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 124 references

Suppressed plasmon excitations, enhanced damping and static screening in Kek-Y strained $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$ model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In the Kek-α model, the fast Dirac cone takes over the particle-hole continuum as α grows, leaving stable plasmons only at small α and very small wave vectors.

desk verdict New and mostly plausible RPA response calculation for the Kek-α model, with a real algebraic error in Eq. (18) and a load-bearing validity problem at the large-α values where the physics is claimed to be most distinctive. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01213 v1 pith:QIPZFVTY submitted 2026-08-02 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Jean Marseille , Teresa Lee , Andrii Iurov , Liubov Zhemchuzhna , Godfrey Gumbs , Danhong Huang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords Kek-αmodelα-T3latticeplasmondampingLandaupolarizationfunctionDiracconesflatbandsstaticscreening

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the Kek-α model, a hybrid of Kekulé-distorted graphene and the α-T3 lattice, and works out its collective electronic response. It shows that the low-energy spectrum carries two inequivalent Dirac cones with different Fermi velocities plus two flat bands, and that these give rise to two distinct branches of particle-hole excitations. As the hopping parameter α grows, the fast-cone branch dominates and pushes most plasmon modes into the damping region; stable plasmons survive only for small α or very small wave vectors. The paper also finds that static screening and Friedel oscillations keep the same qualitative form as in the unstrained α-T3 model. If correct, the model provides a tunable platform for controlling plasmon damping by changing α.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 6×6 low-energy Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) built from two 3×3 blocks and the relative hopping parameter $\alpha=\tan\phi$, whose spectrum gives two degenerate flat bands and two Dirac cones with velocities $v_F$ and $\sqrt{1+4\alpha^2}\,v_F$. The argument runs through the full 36-element set of wave-function overlap factors $O_{\lambda,\lambda'}(\mathbf{k},\mathbf{q})$, which enter the RPA polarization function; the two distinct velocity scales set the two particle-hole branches, and the flat-band transitions add damping channels. An alternative derivation via band projectors confirms the overlap results.

What would settle it

Compute the dynamic polarization from a full tight-binding model of a one-sublattice Kekulé lattice at α=0.5 and compare the imaginary part: if the high-frequency branch (fast cone) does not dominate the response, or if an undamped plasmon appears well above q/k_F ≈ 0.5, the paper's central claim would be contradicted. Alternatively, measure the plasmon dispersion by electron energy loss spectroscopy on a Kek-α sample and look for the predicted rapid onset of Landau damping.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the 6×6 effective Hamiltonian derived in Ref. [65], the paper derives all 36 wave-function overlap factors and evaluates the dynamical polarization function analytically and numerically. The central finding is that the particle-hole continuum splits into two branches set by the two Dirac-cone velocities $v_F$ and $\sqrt{1+4\alpha^2}\,v_F$. Transitions involving the fast cone, including those with the flat bands, create a broad damping region above the main diagonal; as α increases this fast-cone contribution dominates the response, so the zero of the dielectric function $\epsilon(q,\omega|\alpha)=1-v_C(q)\Pi^{(0)}(q,\omega|\alpha)$ that defines the plasmon lies inside the Landa

Load-bearing premise

In Sec. II the authors state that the effective Hamiltonian is accurate mainly for small α ≪ 1, close to graphene; the central claim about suppressed plasmons at larger α, including the dice-limit α=1, depends on that Hamiltonian remaining quantitatively valid there.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For α up to roughly 0.5, undamped plasmon modes exist only for wave vectors well below the Fermi wave vector, making the Kek-α model a tunable absorber or damper at moderate α.
The position of the kink in the static polarizability (and hence Friedel-oscillation decay ~1/r⁴) survives strain, so Kek-α screening behaves like α-T3, not like graphene.
The α-dependence of the plasmon frequency is non-monotonic, unlike the unstrained α-T3, so the same material could show a minimal or maximal collective response depending on α.
The two-peak structure of the polarization function offers a direct spectroscopic signature to identify the fast and slow cones in experiments, for instance through electron energy loss or optical absorption.
The graphene limit α=0 checks against known results, validating the overlap-factor machinery for the new model.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension is to compute the same polarization function from a full tight-binding model at α=0.5; if the fast-cone branch does not dominate, the model's large-α predictions would need revision.
The two-velocity splitting mechanism is generic; any Dirac material with unequal cone velocities, e.g., strained graphene, should show similar split particle-hole branches and enhanced damping.
The non-monotonic α dependence of the plasmon frequency suggests that a Kek-α sample could be tuned through a maximum collective response by small changes in the Kekulé coupling strength.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The polarization, plasmon, and static screening calculation for the Kek-α model is genuinely new, and the qualitative picture—two unequal Dirac cones, two-branch particle-hole continuum, enhanced damping from flat-band and inter-cone transitions—is believable. Credit is due for systematically deriving all 36 overlap factors, checking the α=0 graphene limit against the known result, and providing a Green's-function/projector derivation that cross-checks the overlap formalism. The comparison with the unstrained α-T₃ model adds useful context. The Hamiltonian from Ref. [65] is properly credited, and the citation pattern looks honest.

The soft spots, in order of seriousness. First, Eq. (18) as printed is wrong: for α=0.5 and δ=π it gives a negative value, which a squared inner product cannot do. The line just below shows the origin—cos(δ) appears instead of cos²(δ), and the final expression should be nonnegative. This is a localized algebraic error, but it sits in a central overlap factor and needs to be corrected, with the numerics rechecked where that factor contributes. Second, the stress-test note about model validity is on target. The authors themselves say in Sec. II that the effective Hamiltonian only works well for α≪1. Yet the abstract and the headline results emphasize α=0.5 and α=1. The formal α→1 limit of the matrix does not establish that it correctly describes the dice-lattice limit of the Kek-α lattice; it only shows the model has a dice-like limit. This does not destroy the small-α conclusions, but the strong statements about suppressed plasmons at large α are not yet grounded in a controlled approximation. Third, the Fermi-energy scale E_F⁰ is never properly defined; μ is later set to 1.0E_F⁰ and q is measured in terms of Q⁰=E_F⁰/(ħv_F), but the reader cannot reconstruct what this corresponds to in the band structure. Minor but needs cleanup. Fourth, there is no code or data to reproduce the numerics—annoying for an RPA calculation, not disqualifying.

The central argument holds up if you read the paper as a small-α calculation with plausible extrapolation. The large-α claims need either a benchmark against the full lattice model or explicit hedging. This paper deserves a serious referee: the errors are localized and the qualitative result is likely right. Send it to peer review, but expect major revision.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Kek-Y strained α–T3 (Kek-α) model defined by the 6×6 effective Hamiltonian of Ref. [65]. It derives the band structure (two inequivalent Dirac cones with Fermi velocities v_F and sqrt(1+4α²)v_F, plus two flat bands), lists all 36 wave-function overlap factors, and uses them to compute the dynamical polarization, RPA dielectric function, plasmon dispersions, Landau damping, and static screening. The main claims are that the particle-hole continuum has two branches associated with the two cones, that the fast-cone contribution dominates as α increases, and that undamped plasmons survive only for small α or very small wave vectors. The α→0 limit is benchmarked against graphene.

Significance. If the results are correct, the paper identifies a qualitatively new collective-response feature in a flat-band two-cone Dirac model: a two-branch particle-hole continuum with an α-controlled crossover and a strong suppression of stable plasmons. This is a useful addition to the plasmonics literature on α-T3 and Kek-Y systems. The paper also contains analytically derived projector-operator checks and an explicit graphene-limit verification, which are strengths. However, the central quantitative statements rest on a demonstrably wrong printed overlap factor and on computations at α values for which the adopted effective Hamiltonian is stated to be uncontrolled. These issues must be fixed before the qualitative conclusions can be accepted.

major comments (3)

[Sec. III, Eq. (18)] Eq. (18) as printed is algebraically impossible: for α=0.5 and δ_{k,k+q}=π it gives O_{2,2}=(1−1.25)/(1.5)²=−1/9, a negative value for a squared inner product. The error originates in Eq. (19), where the squared modulus of [(1+α²)e^{iδ}+α²e^{-iδ}] is not (1+4α²(1+α²)cosδ). The correct result is [α⁴+(1+α²)²+2α²(1+α²)cos(2δ)]/(1+2α²)². The same problem appears in Appendix C, Eq. (C6), where the dice-limit expression 1/9[1+8cosδ] is also negative at δ=π. Since O_{2,2} enters the polarization sum, the numerical results in Figs. 2–4 may be affected unless the code happened to use the correct expression; the manuscript must be corrected and the calculations re-examined.
[Sec. II and Figs. 2, 4] The model-validity issue is load-bearing. The paper states in Sec. II that the Hamiltonian from Ref. [65] 'only works well for small α≪1' and that 'the precision of this model is much higher for a small α, close to graphene.' Yet the central claims—fast-cone dominance, enhanced damping, and dice-lattice-limit suppression of plasmons—are presented at α=0.5 and α=1 (Figs. 2 and 4, and Appendix C). A formal α→1 limit of the effective matrix does not establish that the matrix quantitatively describes the Kek-Y α-T3 lattice at large α. The authors should either restrict the quantitative claims to the regime where the Hamiltonian is valid, or provide a validation (e.g., against the parent lattice model or a controlled expansion) showing that the α=0.5 and α=1 response functions are reliable.
[Eqs. (20)–(30) and polarization sum] Because overlap factors are the only nontrivial input to the polarization function beyond the band dispersions, any incorrect overlap changes both the real and imaginary parts of Π⁰ and therefore the plasmon damping boundaries. The manuscript should state which overlap factors were actually implemented in the numerics. If the printed Eq. (18) was not used, the text should be corrected; if it was used, the numerical results and the abstract's claim that plasmons are suppressed for larger α need to be re-derived. This is not a cosmetic typo, since O_{2,2} describes transitions within the α-dependent flat band and contributes to the particle-hole continuum.

minor comments (5)

[Fig. 3 caption] The caption for Fig. 3 refers to 'upper panels (a), (b) and (c)' and 'three lower plots', but the figure contains only two panels. The caption and panel labels should be reconciled.
[Sec. III, text near Eq. (13)] The notation '6X' in Eq. (13) is not standard; it presumably denotes a summation symbol. Please typeset all sums properly.
[Sec. III, last paragraph] The phrase 'for a Keck-alpha model' contains a typo ('Keck' should be 'Kek').
[Eqs. (5)–(6)] The Hamiltonian in Eq. (5) and Eq. (6) should be explicitly checked against each other: the phase factors e^{±iθ_k} in Eq. (5) should correspond to k±/k in Eq. (6). A brief statement verifying this equivalence would help the reader.
[Sec. II, Eq. (8)] The notation 'σ r_ρ^α (ħv_F k)' is confusing because σ is a band index, not a sign factor; please clarify the ordering of the ± signs so that σ=±1 corresponds to conduction/valence bands.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found; the central calculation is a self-contained derivation from an externally derived effective Hamiltonian.

full rationale

The paper's central results — the two-branch particle-hole continuum, the α-dependent dominance of the fast cone, the suppression of stable plasmons, and static screening — are all derived from the 6×6 Hamiltonian Eq. (1), which is taken from Ref. [65], a prior work by a different set of authors. Band dispersions (Eq. (8)), eigenstates (Eqs. (9)-(12)), all 36 overlap factors (Eqs. (17)-(30)), and the RPA polarization/dielectric functions (Eqs. (13), (38)-(40)) follow algebraically and numerically from that input. No parameter is fitted to any target observable, and no predicted quantity is re-inserted as an assumption. The α→0 limit is explicitly benchmarked against the known graphene polarization (Fig. 3 and Appendix B), providing an external check. Self-citations appear only as background or for comparison with the unstrained α-T3 model, not as load-bearing justification of the new results. The Sec. II caveat that the effective Hamiltonian is most accurate for small α is an applicability/validity limitation of the model, not a circular step: it questions whether the Hamiltonian describes the physical lattice at α=0.5 or α=1, but does not make the derivation assume its own conclusion. Accordingly, no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation depends on the externally derived Hamiltonian (Eq. (1)) and on standard RPA and zero-temperature assumptions. No new particles or forces are introduced. The free parameters (alpha, mu, beta_r) are physical tuning knobs of the model, not fitted constants, but the paper's failure to define E_F^(0) makes the doping setup ambiguous.

free parameters (3)

alpha = swept: 0.1, 0.5, 1.0
Relative hopping parameter in the Kek-alpha Hamiltonian. Swept to interpolate between graphene (0) and dice lattice (1); not fitted to data.
chemical potential mu = 0.9, 1.0, 1.5, 1.7, 2.0 x E_F^(0)
Doping level chosen for the numerical plots. E_F^(0) is used as a reference scale but is never explicitly defined.
relative dielectric constant beta_r = 1.0 and 7.0
Dimensionless inverse-dielectric-type parameter in the Coulomb potential v_C. Chosen by hand to illustrate screening strength; not fitted.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The effective 6x6 Hamiltonian Eq. (1) from Ref. [65] correctly describes the low-energy physics of Kek-Y strained alpha-T3.
The entire band structure and polarization calculation rest on this Hamiltonian; the paper does not rederive it.
domain assumption RPA dielectric function Eq. (38) is valid for this model.
Plasmons are obtained as zeros of the RPA dielectric function; vertex corrections are neglected.
standard math Zero-temperature Fermi-Dirac distributions (Heaviside step functions) are used in the polarization integral.
The polarization function Eq. (13) uses f[epsilon] = Theta(x) at T=0; no temperature or lifetime broadening is introduced.
ad hoc to paper The Hamiltonian remains quantitatively valid for alpha up to 1, although the paper itself states the approximation is precise only for small alpha.
Section II says 'the precision of this model is much higher for a small alpha', yet Figs. 2, 4, 5, and 6 present alpha=1 as the dice-lattice limit. If the model is inaccurate there, the corresponding conclusions about plasmons are unsupported.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Suppressed plasmon excitations, enhanced damping and static screening in Kek-Y strained $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$ model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QIPZFVTY

@misc{pith2026260801213,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Suppressed plasmon excitations, enhanced damping and static screening in Kek-Y strained $\alpha-\mathcalT_3$ model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QIPZFVTY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01213}
}

abstract

We performed a rigorous theoretical and numerical investigation into the polarization function, plasmon excitations, and plasmon damping in the Kek-$\alpha$ model, a two-dimensional material combining the key features of the $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$ lattice and Kekule-distorted graphene. Unlike conventional Kek-Y graphene, the Kekule modulation in the Kek-$\alpha$ model affects only one of the two sublattices, giving rise to a fundamentally new model with unusual electronic properties. The low-energy spectrum consists of two degenerate flat bands and two inequivalent Dirac cones with different Fermi velocities, referred to as the fast and slow cones. The particle-hole continuum responsible for Landau damping exhibits two distinct branches associated with transitions involving these Dirac cones. An additional particle-hole mode originates from electron transitions associated with the fast Dirac cone, appearing above the main diagonal. As the parameter $\alpha$ increases, the contribution from the fast Dirac cone becomes dominant. The additional transitions involving the flat bands and the fast Dirac cone substantially reduce the region where undamped plasmons can exist, similarly to the conventional $\alpha-\mathcal{T}_3$. Consequently, stable plasmons are observed only for relatively small values of $\alpha$ or at very small wave vectors. These unusual electronic and collective properties make the Kek-$\alpha$ model a promising platform for future plasmonic and nanoscale electronic applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01213 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: (Color online) Numerically calculated dynamical polarization function Π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3: (Color online) (Color online) Numerically calculated dynamical polarization function Π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: (Color online) Numerically calculated inverse dielectric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: (Color online) Constant-frequency cuts to the real part of the polarization function Π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: (Color online) Dielectric function, Re [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: (Color online) Static dielectric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: (Color online) Numerically calculated dynamical polarization function Π [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

[65]

author L. E. S \'a nchez-Gonz \'a lez , author M. Mojarro , author J. A. Maytorena , and author R. Carrillo-Bastos , journal Physical Review B volume 111 , pages 115417 ( year 2025 )

work page 2025
[1]

author A. K. Geim , journal science volume 324 , pages 1530 ( year 2009 )

2009
[2]

author A. K. Geim and author K. S. Novoselov , journal Nature materials volume 6 , pages 183 ( year 2007 )

2007
[3]

author A. H. Castro Neto , author F. Guinea , author N. M. Peres , author K. S. Novoselov , and author A. K. Geim , journal Reviews of modern physics volume 81 , pages 109 ( year 2009 )

2009
[4]

Ando , journal NPG asia materials volume 1 , pages 17 ( year 2009 )

author T. Ando , journal NPG asia materials volume 1 , pages 17 ( year 2009 )

2009
[5]

Gumbs , author A

author G. Gumbs , author A. Iurov , author D. Huang , and author L. Zhemchuzhna , journal Physical Review B volume 89 , pages 241407 ( year 2014 a )

2014
[6]

author T. O. Wehling , author A. M. Black-Schaffer , and author A. V. Balatsky , journal Advances in Physics volume 63 , pages 1 ( year 2014 )

2014
[7]

author T. G. Pedersen , author A.-P. Jauho , and author K. Pedersen , journal Physical Review B Condensed Matter And Materials Physics volume 79 , pages 113406 ( year 2009 )

2009

Show all 124 references

[8]

author V. M. Pereira , author V. N. Kotov , and author A. Castro Neto , journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics volume 78 , pages 085101 ( year 2008 )

2008
[9]

Kibis , journal Physical Review B volume 81 , pages 165433 ( year 2010 )

author O. Kibis , journal Physical Review B volume 81 , pages 165433 ( year 2010 )

2010
[10]

Ibarra-Sierra , author J

author V. Ibarra-Sierra , author J. Sandoval-Santana , author A. Kunold , and author G. G. Naumis , journal Physical Review B volume 100 , pages 125302 ( year 2019 )

2019
[11]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , author D. Huang , author W.-K. Tse , author K. Blaise , and author C. Ejiogu , journal Scientific Reports volume 12 , pages 21348 ( year 2022 a )

2022
[12]

Oka and author S

author T. Oka and author S. Kitamura , journal Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics volume 10 , pages 387 ( year 2019 )

2019
[13]

Iurov , author M

author A. Iurov , author M. Mattis , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Applied Sciences volume 14 , pages 6027 ( year 2024 )

2024
[14]

Bukov , author L

author M. Bukov , author L. D'Alessio , and author A. Polkovnikov , journal Advances in Physics volume 64 , pages 139 ( year 2015 )

2015
[15]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author D. Dahal , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Physical Review B volume 101 , pages 035129 ( year 2020 a )

2020
[16]

author S. F. Islam and author A. Saha , journal Physical Review B volume 98 , pages 235424 ( year 2018 )

2018
[17]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , author D. Huang , author D. Dahal , and author Y. Abranyos , journal Physical Review B volume 105 , pages 245414 ( year 2022 b )

2022
[18]

author R. E. Aitouni , author M. E. Azar , author C. Cortes , author P. D \' az , author D. Laroze , and author A. Jellal , journal Annalen der Physik volume 538 , pages e70222 ( year 2026 )

2026
[19]

Kristinsson , author O

author K. Kristinsson , author O. V. Kibis , author S. Morina , and author I. A. Shelykh , journal Scientific reports volume 6 , pages 1 ( year 2016 )

2016
[20]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Journal of Applied Physics volume 122 ( year 2017 a )

2017
[21]

Liu , author F

author Z. Liu , author F. Liu , and author Y.-S. Wu , journal Chinese Physics B volume 23 , pages 077308 ( year 2014 )

2014
[22]

Roy and author V

author B. Roy and author V. Juri c i \'c , journal Physical Review B volume 99 , pages 121407 ( year 2019 )

2019
[23]

Milicevic , author G

author M. Milicevic , author G. Montambaux , author T. Ozawa , author O. Jamadi , author B. Real , author I. Sagnes , author A. Lemaitre , author L. Le Gratiet , author A. Harouri , author J. Bloch , et al. , journal Physical Review X volume 9 , pages 031010 ( year 2019 )

2019
[24]

author M. R. Slot , author T. S. Gardenier , author P. H. Jacobse , author G. C. Van Miert , author S. N. Kempkes , author S. J. Zevenhuizen , author C. M. Smith , author D. Vanmaekelbergh , and author I. Swart , journal Nature physics volume 13 , pages 672 ( year 2017 )

2017
[25]

Mukherjee , author A

author S. Mukherjee , author A. Spracklen , author D. Choudhury , author N. Goldman , author P. Ohberg , author E. Andersson , and author R. R. Thomson , journal Physical review letters volume 114 , pages 245504 ( year 2015 )

2015
[26]

Jo , author J

author G.-B. Jo , author J. Guzman , author C. K. Thomas , author P. Hosur , author A. Vishwanath , and author D. M. Stamper-Kurn , journal Physical review letters volume 108 , pages 045305 ( year 2012 )

2012
[27]

Xue , author Y

author H. Xue , author Y. Yang , author F. Gao , author Y. Chong , and author B. Zhang , journal Nature materials volume 18 , pages 108 ( year 2019 )

2019
[28]

Leykam , author A

author D. Leykam , author A. Andreanov , and author S. Flach , journal Advances in Physics: X volume 3 , pages 1473052 ( year 2018 )

2018
[29]

Cao , author V

author Y. Cao , author V. Fatemi , author S. Fang , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author E. Kaxiras , and author P. Jarillo-Herrero , journal Nature volume 556 , pages 43 ( year 2018 a )

2018
[30]

Cao , author V

author Y. Cao , author V. Fatemi , author A. Demir , author S. Fang , author S. L. Tomarken , author J. Y. Luo , author P. Sanchez-Yamagishi , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi , author E. Kaxiras , et al. , journal Nature volume 556 , pages 80 ( year 2018 b )

2018
[31]

author B. R. Ortiz , author L. C. Gomes , author J. R. Morey , author M. Winiarski , author M. Bordelon , author J. S. Mangum , author I. W. H. Oswald , author J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera , author J. R. Neilson , author S. D. Wilson , et al. , journal Physical Review Materials volu...

2019
[32]

Yin et al

author J.-X. Yin et al. , journal Nature Reviews Physics volume 4 , pages 440 ( year 2022 )

2022
[33]

Gorbar , author V

author E. Gorbar , author V. Gusynin , and author D. Oriekhov , journal Physical Review B volume 99 , pages 155124 ( year 2019 )

2019
[34]

Illes , Ph.D

author E. Illes , Ph.D. thesis, school University of Guelph ( year 2017 )

2017
[35]

Roldan , author M

author R. Roldan , author M. Goerbig , and author J.-N. Fuchs , journal Physical Review B volume 83 , pages 205406 ( year 2011 )

2011
[36]

Weekes , author A

author N. Weekes , author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Physical Review B volume 103 , pages 165429 ( year 2021 )

2021
[37]

Raoux , author M

author A. Raoux , author M. Morigi , author J.-N. Fuchs , author F. Pi \'e chon , and author G. Montambaux , journal Physical review letters volume 112 , pages 026402 ( year 2014 )

2014
[38]

Islam , author T

author M. Islam , author T. Biswas , and author S. Basu , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08830 ( year 2023 a )

2023 arXiv
[39]

Islam , author T

author M. Islam , author T. Biswas , and author S. Basu , journal Physical Review B volume 108 , pages 085423 ( year 2023 b )

2023
[40]

Malcolm and author E

author J. Malcolm and author E. Nicol , journal Physical Review B volume 93 , pages 165433 ( year 2016 )

2016
[41]

Oriekho , Ph.D

author D. Oriekho , Ph.D. thesis, school Leiden University ( year 2023 )

2023
[42]

Oriekhov and author V

author D. Oriekhov and author V. Gusynin , journal Physical Review B volume 101 , pages 235162 ( year 2020 )

2020
[43]

Huang , author A

author D. Huang , author A. Iurov , author H.-Y. Xu , author Y.-C. Lai , and author G. Gumbs , journal Physical Review B volume 99 , pages 245412 ( year 2019 )

2019
[44]

Illes and author E

author E. Illes and author E. Nicol , journal Physical Review B volume 95 , pages 235432 ( year 2017 )

2017
[45]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author P. Fekete , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Physical Review Research volume 2 , pages 043245 ( year 2020 b )

2020
[46]

Roslyak , author A

author O. Roslyak , author A. Iurov , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 22 , pages 165301 ( year 2010 )

2010
[47]

Tamang and author T

author L. Tamang and author T. Biswas , journal Physical Review B volume 107 , pages 085408 ( year 2023 )

2023
[48]

Iurov , author G

author A. Iurov , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Physical Review B volume 99 , pages 205135 ( year 2019 )

2019
[49]

Dey and author T

author B. Dey and author T. K. Ghosh , journal Physical Review B volume 98 , pages 075422 ( year 2018 )

2018
[50]

Hou , author C

author C.-Y. Hou , author C. Chamon , and author C. Mudry , journal Physical Review Letters volume 98 , pages 186809 ( year 2007 )

2007
[51]

Jackiw and author S.-Y

author R. Jackiw and author S.-Y. Pi , journal Physical Review Letters volume 98 , pages 266402 ( year 2007 )

2007
[52]

author S. A. Herrera and author G. G. Naumis , journal Physical Review B volume 102 , pages 205429 ( year 2020 a )

2020
[53]

author G. G. Naumis , author S. Barraza-Lopez , author M. Oliva-Leyva , and author H. Terrones , journal Reports on Progress in Physics volume 80 , pages 096501 ( year 2017 )

2017
[54]

Oliva-Leyva and author G

author M. Oliva-Leyva and author G. G. Naumis , journal Physical Review B volume 88 , pages 085430 ( year 2013 )

2013
[55]

author V. M. Pereira , author A. H. Castro Neto , and author N. M. R. Peres , journal Physical Review B volume 80 , pages 045401 ( year 2009 )

2009
[56]

Mojarro , author V

author M. Mojarro , author V. Ibarra-Sierra , author J. Sandoval-Santana , author R. Carrillo-Bastos , and author G. G. Naumis , journal Physical Review B volume 102 , pages 165301 ( year 2020 )

2020
[57]

author S. A. Herrera and author G. G. Naumis , journal Physical Review B volume 101 , pages 205413 ( year 2020 b )

2020
[58]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Applied Sciences volume 13 , pages 6095 ( year 2023 a )

2023
[59]

de Juan , author M

author F. de Juan , author M. Sturla , and author M. A. H. Vozmediano , journal Physical Review Letters volume 108 , pages 227205 ( year 2012 )

2012
[60]

Andrade , author R

author E. Andrade , author R. Carrillo-Bastos , author P. A. Pantale \'o n , and author F. Mireles , journal Physical Review B volume 101 , pages 035416 ( year 2020 )

2020
[61]

author D. A. Ruiz-Tijerina , author E. Andrade , author R. Carrillo-Bastos , author F. Mireles , and author G. G. Naumis , journal Physical Review B volume 100 , pages 075431 ( year 2019 )

2019
[62]

Andrade , author R

author E. Andrade , author R. Carrillo-Bastos , and author G. G. Naumis , journal Physical Review B volume 99 , pages 035411 ( year 2019 )

2019
[63]

Andrade , author R

author E. Andrade , author R. Carrillo-Bastos , and author G. G. Naumis , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 37 , pages 193003 ( year 2025 )

2025
[64]

Eom and author J.-Y

author D. Eom and author J.-Y. Koo , journal Nanoscale volume 12 , pages 19604 ( year 2020 )

2020
[66]

Politano and author G

author A. Politano and author G. Chiarello , journal Nanoscale volume 6 , pages 10927 ( year 2014 )

2014
[67]

Yan , author Z

author H. Yan , author Z. Li , author X. Li , author W. Zhu , author P. Avouris , and author F. Xia , journal Nano letters volume 12 , pages 3766 ( year 2012 )

2012
[68]

Hwang and author S

author E. Hwang and author S. D. Sarma , journal Physical Review B volume 75 , pages 205418 ( year 2007 )

2007
[69]

Polini , author R

author M. Polini , author R. Asgari , author G. Borghi , author Y. Barlas , author T. Pereg-Barnea , and author A. MacDonald , journal Physical Review B volume 77 , pages 081411 ( year 2008 )

2008
[70]

Jablan , author M

author M. Jablan , author M. Solja c i \'c , and author H. Buljan , journal Proceedings of the IEEE volume 101 , pages 1689 ( year 2013 )

2013
[71]

Zhang , author L

author J. Zhang , author L. Zhang , and author W. Xu , journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics volume 45 , pages 113001 ( year 2012 )

2012
[72]

Wunsch , author T

author B. Wunsch , author T. Stauber , author F. Sols , and author F. Guinea , journal New Journal of Physics volume 8 , pages 318 ( year 2006 )

2006
[73]

author T. J. Constant , author S. M. Hornett , author D. E. Chang , and author E. Hendry , journal Nature Physics volume 12 , pages 124 ( year 2016 )

2016
[74]

Gamayun , journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics volume 84 , pages 085112 ( year 2011 )

author O. Gamayun , journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics volume 84 , pages 085112 ( year 2011 )

2011
[75]

Pyatkovskiy , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 21 , pages 025506 ( year 2008 )

author P. Pyatkovskiy , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 21 , pages 025506 ( year 2008 )

2008
[76]

author C. J. Tabert and author E. J. Nicol , journal Physical Review B volume 89 , pages 195410 ( year 2014 )

2014
[77]

Torbatian , author D

author Z. Torbatian , author D. Novko , and author R. Asgari , journal Physical Review B volume 104 , pages 075432 ( year 2021 )

2021
[78]

Hayn , author T

author R. Hayn , author T. Wei , author V. M. Silkin , and author J. van den Brink , journal Physical Review Materials volume 5 , pages 024201 ( year 2021 )

2021
[79]

Gomes and author R

author Y. Gomes and author R. O. Ramos , journal Physical Review B volume 104 , pages 245111 ( year 2021 )

2021
[80]

Ross-Harvey , author A

author G. Ross-Harvey , author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , author D. Huang , and author P. Fekete , journal Physical Review B volume 111 , pages 045413 ( year 2025 )

2025
[81]

author S. M. Badalyan , author A. Matos-Abiague , author G. Vignale , and author J. Fabian , journal Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics volume 79 , pages 205305 ( year 2009 )

2009
[82]

Trescher , author B

author M. Trescher , author B. Sbierski , author P. W. Brouwer , and author E. J. Bergholtz , journal Physical Review B volume 91 , pages 115135 ( year 2015 )

2015
[83]

Sriram , author A

author P. Sriram , author A. Manikandan , author F.-C. Chuang , and author Y.-L. Chueh , journal Small volume 16 , pages 1904271 ( year 2020 )

2020
[84]

Andersen and author K

author K. Andersen and author K. S. Thygesen , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.0158 ( year 2013 )

2013 arXiv
[85]

Scholz , author T

author A. Scholz , author T. Stauber , and author J. Schliemann , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.1666 ( year 2013 )

2013 arXiv
[86]

Sadhukhan , author A

author K. Sadhukhan , author A. Politano , and author A. Agarwal , journal Physical Review Letters volume 124 , pages 046803 ( year 2020 )

2020
[87]

Dutta , author A

author D. Dutta , author A. Chakraborty , and author A. Agarwal , journal Physical Review B volume 107 , pages 165404 ( year 2023 )

2023
[88]

Dey and author T

author B. Dey and author T. K. Ghosh , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 34 , pages 255701 ( year 2022 )

2022
[89]

Shitrit , author I

author N. Shitrit , author I. Yulevich , author V. Kleiner , and author E. Hasman , journal Applied Physics Letters volume 103 ( year 2013 )

2013
[90]

author S. D. Sarma and author Q. Li , journal Physical Review B volume 87 , pages 235418 ( year 2013 )

2013
[91]

Karimi and author I

author F. Karimi and author I. Knezevic , journal Physical Review B volume 96 , pages 125417 ( year 2017 )

2017
[92]

Brey and author H

author L. Brey and author H. Fertig , journal Physical Review B volume 75 , pages 125434 ( year 2007 )

2007
[93]

Fei , author M

author Z. Fei , author M. Goldflam , author J.-S. Wu , author S. Dai , author M. Wagner , author A. McLeod , author M. Liu , author K. Post , author S. Zhu , author G. Janssen , et al. , journal Nano letters volume 15 , pages 8271 ( year 2015 )

2015
[94]

Wang , journal Physical Review B volume 72 , pages 085317 ( year 2005 )

author X.-F. Wang , journal Physical Review B volume 72 , pages 085317 ( year 2005 )

2005
[95]

Kajiwara , author Y

author S. Kajiwara , author Y. Urade , author Y. Nakata , author T. Nakanishi , and author M. Kitano , journal Physical Review B volume 93 , pages 075126 ( year 2016 )

2016
[96]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , author D. Huang , author P. Fekete , author F. Anwar , author D. Dahal , and author N. Weekes , journal Scientific reports volume 11 , pages 20577 ( year 2021 )

2021
[97]

Gumbs , author A

author G. Gumbs , author A. Iurov , and author N. Horing , journal Physical Review B volume 91 , pages 235416 ( year 2015 a )

2015
[98]

Yao , author Y

author B. Yao , author Y. Liu , author S.-W. Huang , author C. Choi , author Z. Xie , author J. Flor Flores , author Y. Wu , author M. Yu , author D.-L. Kwong , author Y. Huang , et al. , journal Nature Photonics volume 12 , pages 22 ( year 2018 )

2018
[99]

Li , author X

author P. Li , author X. Ren , and author L. He , journal Physical Review B volume 96 , pages 165417 ( year 2017 )

2017
[100]

Iurov , Andrii and , author D

author G. Iurov , Andrii and , author D. Huang , and author L. Zhemchuzhna , journal Journal of Applied Physics volume 121 ( year 2017 b )

2017
[101]

author S. D. Sarma and author A. Madhukar , journal Physical Review B volume 23 , pages 805 ( year 1981 )

1981
[102]

Yerin , author A

author Y. Yerin , author A. Varlamov , author R. Felici , and author A. Di Carlo , journal Physical Review B volume 108 , pages 075134 ( year 2023 )

2023
[103]

Ju , author A

author N. Ju , author A. Bulgac , and author J. W. Keller , journal Physical Review B volume 48 , pages 9071 ( year 1993 )

1993
[104]

Gumbs , author A

author G. Gumbs , author A. Balassis , author A. Iurov , and author P. Fekete , journal The Scientific World Journal volume 2014 , pages 726303 ( year 2014 b )

2014
[105]

Berini and author I

author P. Berini and author I. De Leon , journal Nature photonics volume 6 , pages 16 ( year 2012 )

2012
[106]

author W. L. Barnes , journal Journal of optics A: pure and applied optics volume 8 , pages S87 ( year 2006 )

2006
[107]

Balassis , author D

author A. Balassis , author D. Dahal , author G. Gumbs , author A. Iurov , author D. Huang , and author O. Roslyak , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 32 , pages 485301 ( year 2020 )

2020
[108]

Mawrie , author T

author A. Mawrie , author T. Biswas , and author T. K. Ghosh , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 26 , pages 405301 ( year 2014 )

2014
[109]

Tamang , author S

author L. Tamang , author S. Verma , and author T. Biswas , journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.07074 ( year 2023 )

2023 arXiv
[110]

Dutta , author B

author D. Dutta , author B. Ghosh , author B. Singh , author H. Lin , author A. Politano , author A. Bansil , and author A. Agarwal , journal Physical Review B volume 105 , pages 165104 ( year 2022 )

2022
[111]

Gumbs , author A

author G. Gumbs , author A. Iurov , author D. Huang , and author W. Pan , journal Journal of Applied Physics volume 118 ( year 2015 b )

2015
[112]

Koseki , author V

author Y. Koseki , author V. Ryzhii , author T. Otsuji , author V. Popov , and author A. Satou , journal Physical Review B volume 93 , pages 245408 ( year 2016 )

2016
[113]

author A. S. Petrov , author D. Svintsov , author V. Ryzhii , and author M. S. Shur , journal Physical Review B volume 95 , pages 045405 ( year 2017 )

2017
[114]

Mojarro , author R

author M. Mojarro , author R. Carrillo-Bastos , and author J. A. Maytorena , journal Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter volume 38 , pages 243001 ( year 2026 )

2026
[115]

Xiong , author J.-Y

author Q.-Y. Xiong , author J.-Y. Ba , author H.-J. Duan , author M.-X. Deng , author Y.-M. Wang , and author R.-Q. Wang , journal Physical Review B volume 107 , pages 155150 ( year 2023 )

2023
[116]

Mojarro , author R

author M. Mojarro , author R. Carrillo-Bastos , and author J. A. Maytorena , journal Physical Review B volume 103 , pages 165415 ( year 2021 )

2021
[117]

Stauber , author P

author T. Stauber , author P. San-Jose , and author L. Brey , journal New Journal of Physics volume 15 , pages 113050 ( year 2013 )

2013
[118]

Tan , author C.-X

author C.-Y. Tan , author C.-X. Yan , author Y.-H. Zhao , author H. Guo , author H.-R. Chang , et al. , journal Physical Review B volume 103 , pages 125425 ( year 2021 )

2021
[119]

author W. C. Wareham and author E. Nicol , journal Physical Review B volume 108 , pages 085424 ( year 2023 )

2023
[120]

Iurov , author L

author A. Iurov , author L. Zhemchuzhna , author G. Gumbs , and author D. Huang , journal Physical Review B volume 107 , pages 195137 ( year 2023 b )

2023
[121]

Wild , author E

author A. Wild , author E. Mariani , and author M. Portnoi , journal Scientific Reports volume 13 , pages 19211 ( year 2023 )

2023
[122]

Oriekhov and author V

author D. Oriekhov and author V. Gusynin , journal Physical Review B volume 106 , pages 115143 ( year 2022 )

2022
[123]

author S. A. Malik , author M. Ahsan , and author S. F. Islam , journal Physical Review B volume 114 , pages 055406 ( year 2026 )

2026
[124]

Sadhukhan and author A

author K. Sadhukhan and author A. Agarwal , journal Physical Review B volume 96 , pages 035410 ( year 2017 )

2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [65]

author L. E. S \'a nchez-Gonz \'a lez , author M. Mojarro , author J. A. Maytorena , and author R. Carrillo-Bastos , journal Physical Review B volume 111 , pages 115417 ( year 2025 )

work page 2025

[2] [1]

author A. K. Geim , journal science volume 324 , pages 1530 ( year 2009 )

2009

[3] [2]

author A. K. Geim and author K. S. Novoselov , journal Nature materials volume 6 , pages 183 ( year 2007 )

2007

[4] [3]

author A. H. Castro Neto , author F. Guinea , author N. M. Peres , author K. S. Novoselov , and author A. K. Geim , journal Reviews of modern physics volume 81 , pages 109 ( year 2009 )

2009

[5] [4]

Ando , journal NPG asia materials volume 1 , pages 17 ( year 2009 )

author T. Ando , journal NPG asia materials volume 1 , pages 17 ( year 2009 )

2009

[6] [5]

Gumbs , author A

author G. Gumbs , author A. Iurov , author D. Huang , and author L. Zhemchuzhna , journal Physical Review B volume 89 , pages 241407 ( year 2014 a )

2014

[7] [6]

author T. O. Wehling , author A. M. Black-Schaffer , and author A. V. Balatsky , journal Advances in Physics volume 63 , pages 1 ( year 2014 )

2014

[8] [7]

author T. G. Pedersen , author A.-P. Jauho , and author K. Pedersen , journal Physical Review B Condensed Matter And Materials Physics volume 79 , pages 113406 ( year 2009 )

2009