Properties of the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^\pm$ in hot and dense nuclear matter

\`Angels Ramos; Laura Tolos; Tomona Kinugawa

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 94 references

Properties of the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^\pm$ in hot and dense nuclear matter

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper predicts that in hot dense nuclear matter the D_s0*(2317)+ is pulled down and broadened by density, while its antiparticle is governed by temperature, and that the two states remain dynamically generated molecules throughout.

desk verdict A clean, transparent calculation that extends in-medium D_s0* studies to combined density and temperature, but its headline D+ shifts are imported from one external spectral function and can reverse sign under a different but plausible choice. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.01272 v1 pith:DLQJLYDB submitted 2026-08-02 hep-ph nucl-th

Tomona Kinugawa , Àngels Ramos , Laura Tolos This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-phnucl-th

keywords D_s0*(2317)mesonheavychiralperturbationtheoryin-mediumspectralfunctionnuclearmatterheavy-ioncollisionspiondecayconstantdynamicallygeneratedstateshotdense

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper predicts how the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ and its antiparticle behave when embedded in nuclear matter that is both hot and dense. In a coupled-channel molecular model, where the states are generated dynamically from $DK$ and $\bar{D}\bar{K}$ scattering, density is the dominant driver: the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ peak moves down in energy and broadens as it follows the in-medium $D$-meson spectral function, while the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^-$ follows the $\bar{K}$ spectral function and broadens with temperature before saturating. Making the interaction kernel medium-dependent through the pion decay constant lowers the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ mass by roughly 50 MeV at saturation density and up to about 120 MeV at twice saturation, with temperature adding shifts of order 50 to 100 MeV. The contrasting particle-antiparticle behavior offers a way to probe the internal structure of these exotic states in heavy-ion collisions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the in-medium two-meson loop function inside the coupled-channel $T$-matrix $T=(V^{-1}-G)^{-1}$. For the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$, the $DK$ loop is built from the Matsubara sum of a $D$ propagator dressed by the in-medium $D$-meson spectral function and an undressed kaon, and enters together with the $D_s\eta$ channel; for the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^-$, the same construction uses the $\bar{K}$ spectral function with an undressed $\bar{D}$. The second ingredient is the interaction kernel $V$, whose medium dependence enters through the pion decay constant via the Gell-Mann-Oakes-Renner relation; lowering $f_\pi$ strengthens the attraction and shifts the dynamically generated poles.

What would settle it

Take the same coupled-channel kernel and replace the in-medium D-meson spectral function with the alternative one used in the earlier dense-matter study; the paper already reports that this reverses the sign of the mass shift at saturation density and cuts the width from about 150 MeV to about 40 MeV, so the sign of the in-medium mass shift is a decisive test.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ and $D_{s0}^*(2317)^-$ remain dynamically generated bound states under all studied conditions but respond to the medium in opposite ways. The positively charged state feels density mainly through its $DK$ component: as density rises, the $D$ quasiparticle mixes with a $\Sigma_c(2800)$ nucleon-hole mode, and the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ peak tracks that spectral function, shifting to lower energy and broadening to about 150 MeV at saturation density. Temperature partially reverses this: thermal smearing of the Fermi surface and melting of the hole excitation move the peak back toward its free-space mass and narrow it. The negatively charged state is governed by the $\bar{K}$ spectral function: density lowers its mass, temperature pulls it back toward free space, and its width broadens and saturates. A medium-dependent pion decay constant deepens the binding further, lowering the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ mass by roughly 50 MeV at $\rho_0$ and about 120 MeV at $2\rho_0$ at zero temperature, with additional temperature shifts of order 50 to 100 MeV.

Load-bearing premise

The D+ predictions inherit a particular in-medium D-meson broadening profile, and the paper itself shows that swapping in a different published profile reverses the mass shift and shrinks the width; the D- predictions likewise lean on the antikaon broadening profile and on neglecting anticharmed-meson dressing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

In heavy-ion conditions at CBM/FAIR, the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ should appear as a broad peak shifted below its vacuum mass, while the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^-$ should be less density-sensitive but broaden with temperature; the particle-antiparticle asymmetry is a direct experimental fingerprint.
If the medium-dependent pion decay constant is right, the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ mass drops by roughly 50 MeV at saturation density and 120 MeV at twice saturation, providing a quantitative target for in-medium spectroscopy.
The states persist as identifiable quasiparticle peaks at all densities and temperatures studied, so the molecular character does not dissolve under these conditions.
Discrepancies with the earlier dense-matter study are attributed to three modeling choices — the $D$-meson spectral function, a repulsive kaon shift, and coupling to the $D_s\eta$ channel — so the sign of the in-medium mass shift can discriminate between models.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the molecular picture is right, a compact tetraquark or quark-model state should respond more weakly to density and temperature, so measuring the asymmetry between $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ and $D_{s0}^*(2317)^-$ in heavy-ion collisions could distinguish molecular from compact internal structure.
The strong sensitivity to the choice of in-medium $D$-meson spectral function means the predicted 150 MeV width is not a firm number; improved calculations of the $D$ self-energy in matter would sharpen or overturn the central prediction.
Including in-medium dressing for the $\eta$ and $D_s$ mesons, which the authors neglect, could add density-dependent broadening to the coupled-channel loop and modify the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^+$ lineshape at high density.
The $f_\pi(T,\rho)$ prescription uses a single value of the pion-nucleon sigma term and a low-density expansion; testing the sigma-term range 45 to 60 MeV would quantify the uncertainty in the predicted 50 to 120 MeV mass drop.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this is a competent, transparent calculation, and it genuinely extends the previous literature by treating density and temperature together for both D_s0*(2317)+ and -, including a density/temperature dependent kernel via f_pi. The second thing: the headline result for the positively charged state—that nuclear density pulls its mass down by tens of MeV and blows up its width to ~150 MeV—is not coming from this paper's own dynamics; it is imported from the D-meson spectral function of Ref. [64]. The paper itself shows (Sec. IV) that using the spectral function of Ref. [89], as in Ref. [63], gives the opposite sign for the mass shift and a width closer to 40 MeV. That dependence is the softest spot, and it is real.

What is good: the formalism is standard NLO HMChPT, clearly laid out; two regularization schemes (cutoff and DR) give consistent loops; the free-space pole is reproduced by adjusting Lambda and a; the coupled-channel DK-D_s eta structure is included; and the authors are honest about what they neglect. The comparison with Ref. [63] is a genuine strength—they break down the discrepancy into three similarly-sized contributions instead of sweeping it under the rug.

The weaknesses, in proportion: (1) no uncertainty estimate of any kind, and no bracketing over the external spectral functions, so the quoted 50-120 MeV f_pi(T,rho) shifts look like benchmarks when they are really point predictions of one model chain; (2) the neglect of Dbar dressing in the D- channel is acknowledged but could be as important as the Kbar spectral function; (3) the f_pi(T,rho) ansatz is a one-line multiplicative parametrization, not a self-consistent chiral restoration calculation, which limits the interpretation of the "kernel-driven" shifts; (4) the free-space pole is fit, so the "dynamically generated" statement is anchored to a constraint, though this is standard practice in the field. None of this invalidates the paper; it means the predictions are conditional on external inputs.

Who should read it: people working on in-medium heavy mesons, exotic state structure via HICs, and CBM/FAIR phenomenology. It deserves a serious referee: the questions it raises about spectral-function dependence are exactly what referees can push on, and the authors are clearly able to respond. I would send it out.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the in-medium spectral properties of the D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ and D_{s0}^*(2317)^- in hot and dense nuclear matter. The states are generated as coupled-channel DK–D_s η and \bar D\bar K–\bar D_s η molecules from an NLO heavy-meson chiral perturbation theory kernel. Finite-density and finite-temperature effects enter through the two-meson loop functions, which are evaluated using external D-meson and \bar K-meson spectral functions from Refs. [64] and [65], respectively. The paper also considers a medium-dependent pion decay constant f_π(T,ρ) in the kernel. It finds that with increasing density the D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ shifts downward and broadens to a width of about 150 MeV at ρ0, tracking the D-meson spectral function of Ref. [64], while temperature shifts the peak back toward its vacuum mass and narrows it. The D_{s0}^*(2317)^- is governed by the \bar K spectral function: its mass also drops with density and its width broadens and saturates with temperature. Including f_π(T,ρ) lowers both masses by tens to about 150 MeV, with opposite width behavior for the particle and antiparticle. The resulting particle-antiparticle asymmetry is proposed as an observable probe in heavy-ion collisions.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides concrete predictions for the CBM/FAIR program and a plausible connection between chiral restoration and the in-medium behavior of charmed-strange mesons. The formal setup is transparent: the free-space loop functions are given analytically in Appendix B, two regularization schemes are compared, and the discrepancies with the previous calculation of Ref. [63] are discussed openly. The main weakness is that the central quantitative predictions are not self-contained: the density dependence of the D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ is imported from one external D-meson spectral function, and the largest mass shifts come from a factorized f_π(T,ρ) ansatz evaluated with a single value of σπN. Because these inputs are not bracketed, the headline numbers are conditional on external model choices. The paper is a useful contribution, but it needs a sensitivity analysis before its quantitative claims can be considered robust.

major comments (3)

[Sec. IV, Figs. 3–4 and comparison with Ref. [63]] The load-bearing prediction that the D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ shifts downward and acquires a width of about 150 MeV at ρ0 is inherited from the D-meson spectral function of Ref. [64]; it is not derived or validated within this work. The manuscript reports that Ref. [63], using the D spectral function of Ref. [89] together with a repulsive kaon shift and no D_s η coupling, obtains instead an upward shift of about 30 MeV and a width of 40 MeV at ρ0, and attributes the difference to three similarly sized effects. Since no calculation isolates the contribution of the spectral-function choice and no observable is given that selects Ref. [64] over Ref. [89], the sign and magnitude of the central D_{s0}^*(2317)^+ shift are conditional on an external model. I request either a bracketing calculation with the alternative spectral function, with the other two effects switched on one at a time, or an explicit statement that the sign of the density shift is model-dependent.
[Sec. V, Eq. (16)] The large mass drops highlighted in the abstract—about 50 MeV at ρ0 and up to roughly 120 MeV at 2ρ0, with further temperature shifts—follow from the factorized ansatz f_π(T,ρ)=f_π(1 − σπN ρ/(2 m_π^2 f_π^2))(1 − T^2/(12 f_π^2)). This expression is introduced by combining the lowest-order density expansion of the chiral condensate with the low-temperature chiral perturbation theory result, but no justification is given for applying it at T=150 MeV and ρ=2ρ0, where nonlinearities in both variables should be important. The results also depend on the choice σπN=50 MeV within the cited range of 45–60 MeV. Because the f_π(T,ρ) scenario is one of the main quantitative claims, I ask for a sensitivity band in σπN, at least one alternative model for f_π(T,ρ), or a clear downgrading of these numbers to illustrative estimates.
[Sec. IV, D_{s0}^*(2317)^- discussion] The D_{s0}^*(2317)^- prediction relies on the \bar K spectral function of Ref. [65] together with the explicit neglect of in-medium \bar D dressing. The paper itself notes that Ref. [63] uses a different \bar D spectral function and that a direct comparison of the two calculations is therefore not straightforward. This makes the D^- mass shift and width conditional on the same kind of external-input choice as the D^+ result, but no bracketing over the \bar D treatment is provided. A quantitative estimate of the \bar D-dressing uncertainty—for example, using the \bar D spectral function of Ref. [64] or of Ref. [90]—should be added before the D^- result is presented as a firm prediction.

minor comments (4)

[Sec. III] The statement that the D_{s0}^*(2317) is 'dynamically generated' should be qualified: the regularization parameters Λ=615 MeV and a=−1.79 (Table III) are fixed by requiring the vacuum amplitude to have a pole at the empirical mass, so the free-space pole position is an input. This does not invalidate the in-medium shifts, but the qualification should be explicit.
[Sec. IV, Figs. 5 and 6] For the \bar D\bar K channel only the dimensional-regularization results are shown; the text states consistency between the two schemes for the DK channel, but no cutoff-scheme counterpart is displayed for D^-. Please add the cutoff results or explain why only the DR scheme is used in this case.
[Sec. II.B, Eq. (11) and Table III] The integration window [ω_min, ω_max] is a numerical input with no reported test of sensitivity to its boundaries. Since the spectral functions have non-negligible tails, a brief convergence check should be added.
[Sec. V] When presenting the f_π(T,ρ) scenarios, the text should state explicitly that the medium-modified f_π enters only the interaction kernel, while the loop functions continue to use vacuum masses and the external spectral functions. This is a reasonable first step, but leaving it implicit may give the impression that all f_π-dependent effects are included consistently.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Free-space pole is calibrated by tuning, and the central in-medium D+ behavior is largely imported from same-group spectral functions; the combined hot-dense calculation is nonetheless a genuine computation.

fitted input called prediction [Sec. III (paragraph before Fig. 2) and Appendix A, Table III]
"The regularization parameters have been adjusted to reproduce the empirical mass of the D∗ s0(2317)+ state. The resulting values are Λ = 615 MeV for the cutoff scheme, and a subtraction constant of a = −1.79 for the DR scheme at a regularization scale of µ = 1000 MeV. Utilizing these parameters, the modulus of the DK T-matrix ... showing a clear pole corresponding to the dynamically generated bound state."

The free-space pole at 2317 MeV is not a prediction: the two regularization parameters Λ and a are tuned to reproduce the empirical mass, and the pole is then presented as evidence of a dynamically generated state. This is calibration of the input rather than an independent result. It does not by itself make the medium predictions circular, because the in-medium mass and width are computed relative to this calibrated vacuum pole, but it anchors the 'dynamically generated' claim to the fit.
self citation load bearing [Sec. II B 1 (Eq. 11) and Sec. IV (comparison with Ref. [63])]
"In evaluating Eq. (11), we use the D-meson spectral function in nuclear matter obtained in Ref. [64]. ... These differences are mostly attributed to the different D-meson spectral function employed in the DK loop. The study of Ref. [63] implemented the D-meson spectral function obtained in Ref. [89]."

The central D+ prediction—a downward shift and a large broadening with density—is inherited from the D-meson spectral function of Ref. [64], whose authors overlap with the present paper. The paper's own comparison with Ref. [63] shows that replacing this input with the Ref. [89] spectral function changes the density shift from attractive to repulsive and reduces the width from about 150 MeV to about 40 MeV. Thus the sign and magnitude of the lead in-medium effect reduce to the choice of a self-cited, unvalidated external input rather than being derived or benchmarked inside the paper. The circularity is only partial because the in-medium loop, the coupled-channel amplitude, and the fπ(T,ρ) effects are computed rather than fitted.

full rationale

The paper solves a well-defined coupled-channel scattering equation with medium-modified two-meson loop functions, so the in-medium pole positions and widths are computed, not fitted to the Ds0*(2317) medium data. The free-space regularization constants are tuned to the vacuum mass, which is standard calibration and does not force the medium shifts. The main circularity concern is the load-bearing reliance on same-group external spectral functions: Ref. [64] for the D meson and Ref. [65] for the anti-K meson. These are not machine-checked or parameter-free, and the paper's own comparison with Ref. [63] demonstrates that choosing a different D spectral function reverses the central D+ density shift. This makes the central quantitative claims conditional on a self-cited input, but it is not a full constructional circularity because the hot-dense calculation, the temperature dependence, and the medium-dependent pion-decay-constant effects are new computations with independent content. Score 4 captures this partial, load-bearing input dependence.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on several externally supplied model inputs: the molecular nature of D_s0*, the D and Kbar spectral functions, and the medium-modified f_pi. None are derived in this paper. The regularization parameters are fitted to the empirical vacuum mass, making the free-space pole position an input rather than a prediction. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (4)

Sharp cutoff Lambda = 615 MeV
Cutoff in the three-momentum loop integral, tuned so that the vacuum scattering amplitude has a pole at the empirical D_s0*(2317) mass (Sec. II A and Sec. III).
Dimensional-regularization subtraction constant a(mu) = -1.79 at mu = 1000 MeV
Subtraction constant in the DR loop function, also tuned to reproduce the empirical D_s0*(2317) mass in free space.
Pion-nucleon sigma term sigma_piN = 50 MeV
Used in Eq. (16) for the density dependence of f_pi; chosen within the cited 45-60 MeV range, and no uncertainty band is propagated into the mass and width results.
Spectral-function integration window = 1510-2450 MeV (DK), 50-1500 MeV (DbarKbar)
The omega_min and omega_max values in Table III are chosen by hand to cover the non-negligible strength of the in-medium spectral functions; the results may depend on these cuts.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The D_s0*(2317)± is a pure s-wave DK or DbarKbar molecule dynamically generated without a bare seed state.
Sec. II A states the state is generated 'without introducing an explicit bare D_s0*(2317) field.' If a compact core contributes, the medium response would differ.
domain assumption NLO HMChPT with lattice-determined low-energy constants describes the DK-Ds eta interaction.
Sec. II A and Table I use the Fit-2B low-energy constants of Ref. [69]; the applicability of the effective theory at the D_s0* mass is assumed.
domain assumption The in-medium D and Kbar spectral functions from Refs. [64] and [65] are reliable inputs.
These spectral functions enter Eqs. (11) and the analogous DbarKbar loop, and the central results track them. The paper acknowledges that density dressing of Ds and eta is left to future work.
ad hoc to paper The medium-dependent pion decay constant factorizes as in Eq. (16).
The multiplicative combination of a linear density term and a T^2 chiral term is an assumption used to rescale the entire interaction kernel in Sec. V.
domain assumption The K meson in the DK loop and the Dbar meson in the DbarKbar loop are treated as undressed.
Sec. II B justifies the K choice by a mild KN interaction and the Dbar choice by a small repulsive shift. The comparison with Ref. [63] shows that adding a repulsive K shift changes the D+ mass by tens of MeV.
domain assumption Isospin symmetry is assumed throughout.
Sec. II states 'we assume the isospin-symmetric limit.' This neglects small isospin-breaking effects that are not central to the medium trends.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Properties of the $D_{s0}^*(2317)^\pm$ in hot and dense nuclear matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DLQJLYDB

@misc{pith2026260801272,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Properties of the $D_s0^*(2317)^\pm$ in hot and dense nuclear matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DLQJLYDB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01272}
}

abstract

We investigate the properties of the $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^\pm$ in hot and dense nuclear matter using a coupled-channel molecular model built on next-to-leading-order heavy meson chiral perturbation theory. In-medium modifications to the $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^+$ stem from changes to the $DK$ channel within the coupled $DK$-$D_s \eta$ system. As nuclear density increases, the $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^+$ quasiparticle peak shifts toward lower energies and broadens, tracking the behavior of the $D$-meson spectral function. As for temperature effects, those are milder, with the thermal smearing of the Fermi surface and the melting of $\Sigma_c N^{-1}$ excitations in the $D$-meson spectral function shifting the $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^+$ peak back toward its free-space mass while narrowing it. Conversely, the behavior of the $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^-$ is governed by the $\bar D \bar K$ channel and its medium behavior is driven by the $\bar K$ spectral function. With increasing temperature, the $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^-$ also approaches its free-space mass, but its width broadens before saturating at high temperatures. Incorporating explicit medium dependencies into the interaction kernel, driven by density and/or temperature variations in the pion decay constant, further shifts the $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^+$ mass lower and narrows its width with temperature. As for $D_{s0}^\ast(2317)^-$, its mass also drops with temperature but its width increases. These contrasting medium behaviors offer a promising pathway to constrain the internal structure of these exotic states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.01272 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. The modulus of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Real (solid lines) and imaginary (dashed lines) parts of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The modulus of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Real (solid lines) and imaginary (dashed lines) parts of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. The modulus of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. The modulus of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Mass (top panels) and width (bottom panels) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. The modulus of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Mass (top panels) and width (bottom panels) of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

[64]

Pseudoscalar and vector open-charm mesons at finite temperature

G. Monta˜ na, `A. Ramos, L. Tolos, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Phys. Rev. D102, 096020 (2020), arXiv:2007.12601 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020
[89]

Kaiser, P

N. Kaiser, P. de Homont, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. C 77, 025204 (2008), arXiv:0711.3154 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2008
[63]

Montesinos, M

V. Montesinos, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos, Phys. Lett. B853, 138656 (2024), arXiv:2403.00451 [hep- ph]

arXiv 2024
[65]

Recent progress on in-medium properties of heavy mesons from finite-temperature EFTs

G. Montana, A. Ramos, L. Tolos, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Front. in Phys.11, 1250939 (2023), arXiv:2307.03640 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2023
[90]

D. Jido, T. Hatsuda, and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Lett. B 670, 109 (2008), arXiv:0805.4453 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2008
[1]

In-medium and finite-temperature loop function Finite-temperature and finite-density effects can be in- corporated into the two-meson loop functions through the thermal statistical factors and the in-medium mod- ification of the meson propagators. At finite tempera- ture, the two-meson loop function is evaluated within the imaginary-time formalism by repl...
[2]

Unidad de Excelencia Mar´ ıa de Maeztu

Density and temperature dependent pion decay constant So far, we have not accounted for the possible density and temperature dependence of the interaction kernel. In our approach, the interaction is proportional to the uni- versal vector meson coupling constantg, related to the pion decay constant byg=m V/(2fπ), wherem V is an appropriate vector meson mas...
[3]

Mikamiet al.(Belle), Phys

Y. Mikamiet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 012002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0307052

arXiv 2004

Show all 94 references

[4]

Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys

B. Aubertet al.(BaBar), Phys. Rev. Lett.90, 242001 (2003), arXiv:hep-ex/0304021

2003 arXiv
[5]

Bessonet al.(CLEO), Phys

D. Bessonet al.(CLEO), Phys. Rev. D68, 032002 (2003), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 119908 (2007)], arXiv:hep-ex/0305100

2003 arXiv
[6]

J. Zeng, J. W. Van Orden, and W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. D52, 5229 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9412269

1995 arXiv
[7]

Godfrey and N

S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D32, 189 (1985)

1985
[8]

Godfrey and R

S. Godfrey and R. Kokoski, Phys. Rev. D43, 1679 (1991)

1991
[9]

T. A. Lahde, C. J. Nyfalt, and D. O. Riska, Nucl. Phys. A674, 141 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/9908485

2000 arXiv
[10]

S. N. Gupta and J. M. Johnson, Phys. Rev. D51, 168 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9409432

1995 arXiv
[11]

Ebert, V

D. Ebert, V. O. Galkin, and R. N. Faustov, Phys. Rev. D57, 5663 (1998), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 59, 019902 (1999)], arXiv:hep-ph/9712318

1998 arXiv
[12]

Colangelo and F

P. Colangelo and F. De Fazio, Phys. Lett. B570, 180 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305140

2003 arXiv
[13]

Di Pierro and E

M. Di Pierro and E. Eichten, Phys. Rev. D64, 114004 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0104208

2001 arXiv
[14]

Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys

S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

2024
[15]

W. A. Bardeen, E. J. Eichten, and C. T. Hill, Phys. Rev. D68, 054024 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305049

2003 arXiv
[16]

Dai, C.-S

Y.-B. Dai, C.-S. Huang, C. Liu, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D68, 114011 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0306274

2003 arXiv
[17]

Narison, Phys

S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B605, 319 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0307248

2005
[18]

Lakhina and E

O. Lakhina and E. S. Swanson, Phys. Lett. B650, 159 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0608011

2007 arXiv
[19]

I. W. Lee, T. Lee, D. P. Min, and B.-Y. Park, Eur. Phys. J. C49, 737 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0412210

2007 arXiv
[20]

Z. G. Wang and S. L. Wan, Phys. Rev. D73, 094020 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0603007

2006 arXiv
[21]

Chen and X.-Q

Y.-Q. Chen and X.-Q. Li, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 232001 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0407062

2004 arXiv
[22]

Cheng and W.-S

H.-Y. Cheng and W.-S. Hou, Phys. Lett. B566, 193 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305038

2003 arXiv
[23]

Terasaki, Phys

K. Terasaki, Phys. Rev. D68, 011501 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0305213

2003
[24]

Wang and S.-L

Z.-G. Wang and S.-L. Wan, Nucl. Phys. A778, 22 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0602080

2006 arXiv
[25]

Maiani, F

L. Maiani, F. Piccinini, A. D. Polosa, and V. Riquer, Phys. Rev. D71, 014028 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0412098

2005 arXiv
[26]

M. E. Bracco, A. Lozea, R. D. Matheus, F. S. Navarra, and M. Nielsen, Phys. Lett. B624, 217 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0503137

2005 arXiv
[27]

E. E. Kolomeitsev and M. F. M. Lutz, Phys. Lett. B582, 39 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307133

2004 arXiv
[28]

Barnes, F

T. Barnes, F. E. Close, and H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Rev. D 68, 054006 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305025

2003 arXiv
[29]

A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Lett. B567, 23 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305060

2003 arXiv
[30]

Gamermann, E

D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman, and M. J. Vi- cente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D76, 074016 (2007), arXiv:hep- ph/0612179

2007
[31]

Hofmann and M

J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, Nucl. Phys. A733, 142 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0308263

2004 arXiv
[32]

Guo, P.-N

F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, R.-G. Ping, and B.-S. Zou, Phys. Lett. B641, 278 (2006), arXiv:hep- ph/0603072

2006
[33]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, S. Krewald, and U.-G. Meissner, Phys. Lett. B666, 251 (2008), arXiv:0806.3374 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[34]

Faessler, T

A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij, and Y.-L. Ma, Phys. Rev. D76, 014005 (2007), arXiv:0705.0254 [hep-ph]

2007 arXiv
[35]

J. M. Flynn and J. Nieves, Phys. Rev. D75, 074024 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0703047

2007 arXiv
[36]

Guo, U.-G

Z.-H. Guo, U.-G. Meißner, and D.-L. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094008 (2015), arXiv:1507.03123 [hep-ph]

2015 arXiv
[37]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meissner, Eur. Phys. J. A40, 171 (2009), arXiv:0901.1597 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[38]

L. Liu, K. Orginos, F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, and U.-G. Meissner, Phys. Rev. D87, 014508 (2013), arXiv:1208.4535 [hep-lat]

2013 arXiv
[39]

F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, and B.-S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015004 (2018), [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)], arXiv:1705.00141 [hep-ph]

2018 arXiv
[40]

Albaladejo, P

M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, F.-K. Guo, and J. Nieves, Phys. Lett. B767, 465 (2017), arXiv:1610.06727 [hep-ph]

2017 arXiv
[41]

Albaladejo, D

M. Albaladejo, D. Jido, J. Nieves, and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 300 (2016), arXiv:1604.01193 [hep-ph]

2016 arXiv
[42]

P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. D94, 074037 (2016), arXiv:1603.07000 [hep- ph]

2016 arXiv
[43]

T. E. Browder, S. Pakvasa, and A. A. Petrov, Phys. Lett. B578, 365 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0307054

2004 arXiv
[44]

van Beveren and G

E. van Beveren and G. Rupp, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 012003 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0305035

2003 arXiv
[45]

Dougall, R

A. Dougall, R. D. Kenway, C. M. Maynard, and C. McNeile (UKQCD), Phys. Lett. B569, 41 (2003), arXiv:hep-lat/0307001

2003 arXiv
[46]

Albaladejo, P

M. Albaladejo, P. Fernandez-Soler, J. Nieves, and P. G. Ortega, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 722 (2018), arXiv:1805.07104 [hep-ph]

2018 arXiv
[47]

G. S. Bali, Phys. Rev. D68, 071501 (2003), arXiv:hep- ph/0305209

2003
[48]

C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D90, 034510 (2014), arXiv:1403.8103 [hep-lat]

2014 arXiv
[49]

Mohler, S

D. Mohler, S. Prelovsek, and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. D87, 034501 (2013), arXiv:1208.4059 [hep-lat]

2013 arXiv
[50]

Mohler, C

D. Mohler, C. B. Lang, L. Leskovec, S. Prelovsek, and R. M. Woloshyn, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 222001 (2013), arXiv:1308.3175 [hep-lat]

2013 arXiv
[51]

Alexandrou, J

C. Alexandrou, J. Berlin, J. Finkenrath, T. Leontiou, and M. Wagner, Phys. Rev. D101, 034502 (2020), arXiv:1911.08435 [hep-lat]

2020 arXiv
[52]

G. S. Bali, S. Collins, A. Cox, and A. Sch¨ afer, Phys. Rev. D96, 074501 (2017), arXiv:1706.01247 [hep-lat]

2017 arXiv
[53]

G. K. C. Cheung, C. E. Thomas, D. J. Wilson, G. Moir, M. Peardon, and S. M. Ryan (Hadron Spectrum), JHEP 02, 100 (2021), arXiv:2008.06432 [hep-lat]

2021 arXiv
[54]

Albaladejo, J

M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and E. Ruiz-Arriola, Phys. Rev. D108, 014020 (2023), arXiv:2304.03107 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[55]

Yang, G.-J

Z. Yang, G.-J. Wang, J.-J. Wu, M. Oka, and S.-L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 112001 (2022), arXiv:2107.04860 [hep-ph]

2022 arXiv
[56]

Liu, J.-X

Z.-W. Liu, J.-X. Lu, and L.-S. Geng, Phys. Rev. D107, 16 074019 (2023), arXiv:2302.01046 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[57]

Albaladejo, J

M. Albaladejo, J. M. Nieves, and L. Tolos, Phys. Rev. C104, 035203 (2021), arXiv:2102.08589 [hep-ph]

2021 arXiv
[58]

Ikeno, G

N. Ikeno, G. Toledo, and E. Oset, Phys. Lett. B847, 138281 (2023), arXiv:2305.16431 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[59]

J. M. Torres-Rincon, A. Ramos, and L. Tolos, Phys. Rev. D108, 096008 (2023), arXiv:2307.02102 [hep-ph]

2023 arXiv
[60]

Monta˜ na, A

G. Monta˜ na, A. Ramos, L. Tolos, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Phys. Lett. B806, 135464 (2020), arXiv:2001.11877 [hep-ph]

2020 arXiv
[61]

Montesinos, M

V. Montesinos, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos, Phys. Rev. C108, 035205 (2023), arXiv:2306.17673 [hep- ph]

2023 arXiv
[62]

Molina, D

R. Molina, D. Gamermann, E. Oset, and L. Tolos, Eur. Phys. J. A42, 31 (2009), arXiv:0806.3711 [nucl-th]

2009 arXiv
[66]

M. F. M. Lutz and M. Soyeur, Nucl. Phys. A813, 14 (2008), arXiv:0710.1545 [hep-ph]

2008 arXiv
[67]

Tolos, A

L. Tolos, A. Ramos, and T. Mizutani, Phys. Rev. C77, 015207 (2008), arXiv:0710.2684 [nucl-th]

2008 arXiv
[68]

Tolos, D

L. Tolos, D. Cabrera, and A. Ramos, Phys. Rev. C78, 045205 (2008), arXiv:0807.2947 [nucl-th]

2008 arXiv
[69]

Z.-H. Guo, L. Liu, U.-G. Meißner, J. A. Oller, and A. Rusetsky, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 13 (2019), arXiv:1811.05585 [hep-ph]

2019 arXiv
[70]

L. S. Geng, N. Kaiser, J. Martin-Camalich, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. D82, 054022 (2010), arXiv:1008.0383 [hep-ph]

2010 arXiv
[71]

L. M. Abreu, D. Cabrera, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Annals Phys.326, 2737 (2011), arXiv:1104.3815 [hep-ph]

2011 arXiv
[72]

Waas and W

T. Waas and W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A625, 287 (1997)

1997
[73]

Matsubara, Prog

T. Matsubara, Prog. Theor. Phys.14, 351
[74]

J. I. Kapusta and C. Gale,Finite-temperature field theory: Principles and applications, Cambridge Mono- graphs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

2011
[75]

C. E. Jimenez-Tejero, A. Ramos, L. Tolos, and I. Vidana, Phys. Rev. C84, 015208 (2011), arXiv:1102.4786 [hep- ph]

2011 arXiv
[76]

Inoue and E

T. Inoue and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. A710, 354 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0205028

2002 arXiv
[77]

M. Post, S. Leupold, and U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. A741, 81 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0309085

2004 arXiv
[78]

in contrast to the cutoff approach employed in [76], a phenomenon recently discussed in [79]. Ignoring this mode, we can summarize the various findings in the lit- erature by stating that theηandD s spectral functions in nuclear matter present well-distinguished quasiparti- cl...
[79]

C. E. Jimenez-Tejero, A. Ramos, and I. Vidana, Phys. Rev. C80, 055206 (2009), arXiv:0907.5316 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[80]

M. F. M. Lutz and C. L. Korpa, Phys. Lett. B633, 43 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0510006

2006 arXiv
[81]

Hofmann and M

J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, Nucl. Phys. A763, 90 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0507071

2005 arXiv
[82]

E. E. Garcia-Gonzales, V. K. Magas, and A. Ramos, (2026), arXiv:2605.21205 [hep-ph]

2026 arXiv
[83]

Tolos and L

L. Tolos and L. Fabbietti, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.112, 103770 (2020), arXiv:2002.09223 [nucl-ex]

2020 arXiv
[84]

Gasser and H

J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B184, 83 (1987)

1987
[85]

Gerber and H

P. Gerber and H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B321, 387 (1989)

1989
[86]

Kodama and M

N. Kodama and M. Oka, Nucl. Phys. A601, 304 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9510401

1996 arXiv
[87]

Bochkarev and J

A. Bochkarev and J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D54, 4066 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9602405

1996 arXiv
[88]

Kim and M

H.-c. Kim and M. Oka, Nucl. Phys. A720, 368 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0301227

2003 arXiv
[91]

Goda and D

S. Goda and D. Jido, PTEP2014, 033D03 (2014), arXiv:1312.0832 [nucl-th]

2014 arXiv
[92]

Tolos, C

L. Tolos, C. Garcia-Recio, and J. Nieves, Phys. Rev. C 80, 065202 (2009), arXiv:0905.4859 [nucl-th]

2009 arXiv
[93]

Garcia-Recio, V

C. Garcia-Recio, V. K. Magas, T. Mizutani, J. Nieves, A. Ramos, L. L. Salcedo, and L. Tolos, Phys. Rev. D 79, 054004 (2009), arXiv:0807.2969 [hep-ph]

2009 arXiv
[94]

J. A. Oller, E. Oset, and J. R. Pelaez, Phys. Rev. D59, 074001 (1999), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 60, 099906 (1999), Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 75, 099903 (2007)], arXiv:hep- ph/9804209

1999

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [64]

Pseudoscalar and vector open-charm mesons at finite temperature

G. Monta˜ na, `A. Ramos, L. Tolos, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Phys. Rev. D102, 096020 (2020), arXiv:2007.12601 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2020

[2] [89]

Kaiser, P

N. Kaiser, P. de Homont, and W. Weise, Phys. Rev. C 77, 025204 (2008), arXiv:0711.3154 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2008

[3] [63]

Montesinos, M

V. Montesinos, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, and L. Tolos, Phys. Lett. B853, 138656 (2024), arXiv:2403.00451 [hep- ph]

arXiv 2024

[4] [65]

Recent progress on in-medium properties of heavy mesons from finite-temperature EFTs

G. Montana, A. Ramos, L. Tolos, and J. M. Torres-Rincon, Front. in Phys.11, 1250939 (2023), arXiv:2307.03640 [hep-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2023

[5] [90]

D. Jido, T. Hatsuda, and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Lett. B 670, 109 (2008), arXiv:0805.4453 [nucl-th]

arXiv 2008

[6] [1]

In-medium and finite-temperature loop function Finite-temperature and finite-density effects can be in- corporated into the two-meson loop functions through the thermal statistical factors and the in-medium mod- ification of the meson propagators. At finite tempera- ture, the two-meson loop function is evaluated within the imaginary-time formalism by repl...

[7] [2]

Unidad de Excelencia Mar´ ıa de Maeztu

Density and temperature dependent pion decay constant So far, we have not accounted for the possible density and temperature dependence of the interaction kernel. In our approach, the interaction is proportional to the uni- versal vector meson coupling constantg, related to the pion decay constant byg=m V/(2fπ), wherem V is an appropriate vector meson mas...

[8] [3]

Mikamiet al.(Belle), Phys

Y. Mikamiet al.(Belle), Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 012002 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0307052

arXiv 2004