Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 47 references

The weakly damped KdV equation with bounded localized noise is exponentially mixing at L^2 regularity, giving the first unique ergodicity result for KdV in L^2.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Weakly damped KdV on a circle with bounded localized random forcing is exponentially mixing: a unique invariant measure exists and attracts all initial data in L2.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-04 challenge →

load-bearing objection First real L^2-level unique ergodicity/exponential mixing for KdV with localized bounded noise; the proof is serious but has two external pillars a referee should dig into. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2608.01863 v1 pith:M6JKY3IX submitted 2026-08-03 math.AP math.DSmath.OCmath.PR

Exponential mixing for Korteweg-de Vries equation with localized noise

Yuxuan Chen , Shengquan Xiang , Zhifei Zhang , Jia-Cheng Zhao This is my paper
classification math.AP math.DSmath.OCmath.PR MSC 35Q5335R6037A2593C20
keywords KdVexponential mixingnonlinear smoothinglocalized noiseunique ergodicityobservability inequalitynormal form transformationBourgain spaces
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Randomly forced, weakly damped KdV equation forgets its initial state exponentially fast, even though the noise is bounded, localized in space-time, and active only on finitely many low Fourier modes. The paper proves that the Markov chain of integer-time snapshots has a unique invariant measure, supported in a bounded subset of H^{1/4+sigma}, and that every L^2 initial law converges to it at an exponential rate. This is, according to the authors, the first unique ergodicity result for KdV posed in L^2. The proof combines an abstract coupling criterion with nonlinear smoothing—the nonlinear part of a solution is smoother than the solution itself—and a stabilization theorem showing that a small local control contracts the distance between nearby trajectories.

Core claim

The central claim is that the weakly damped KdV equation with bounded localized noise is exponentially mixing at L^2 regularity. Under a uniform bound on noise strength and non-degeneracy of the first N Fourier modes, there is a unique invariant measure mu supported in a bounded subset of H^{1/4+sigma}; for every initial state u0 in L^2, the law at integer times converges to mu in the dual-Lipschitz metric with bound C(1+||u0||^2)e^{-gamma n}. The authors present this as the first unique ergodicity result for KdV in L^2, obtained without parabolic smoothing: the regularizing mechanism is nonlinear smoothing of the difference between solution and damped linear flow, plus controllability of th

What carries the argument

Nonlinear smoothing carries the proof: although u(t) and the damped linear evolution remain in L^2, their difference lies in H^s for every s<1/4. A normal-form transformation—integration by parts in time rewrites the quadratic nonlinearity as multilinear operators whose large denominators create the gain—and Bourgain spaces adapted to the KdV dispersion make this quantitative. Smoothing yields exponential asymptotic compactness toward H^{1/4+sigma} and high-frequency dissipation for the linearized equation. Low frequencies are controlled through an observability inequality for the adjoint equation on the noise's space-time window, which via the Hilbert uniqueness method gives finite-dimensio

Load-bearing premise

Everything hinges on the full observability inequality: every nonzero initial state of the adjoint linearized KdV equation must be detectable, with a controlled norm loss, through the small space-time window where the noise lives; its proof relies on a unique continuation property obtained via a Carleman estimate and on propagation-of-regularity results, and if that inequality fails, the low-frequency control step, and with it the exponential-mixing proof, collapses.

What would settle it

Construct a sequence of potentials w_n bounded in the relevant H^{1/4+sigma} trajectory space and initial states phi_{1,n} with ||phi_{1,n}||_{H^{-s}}=1 such that the observed signal G phi_n tends to zero in L^2((t1,t2);H^{-s}(s1,s2)); this would directly violate the full observability inequality and leave the low-frequency controllability step without foundation.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The law of the solution at integer times converges to the unique invariant measure exponentially fast in the dual-Lipschitz metric, uniformly over bounded sets of initial data.
  • The invariant measure is supported in a bounded subset of H^{1/4+sigma}, so all long-time trajectories spend most of their time at slightly higher regularity than the L^2 phase space.
  • A control localized in a small space-time box and acting only on finitely many Fourier modes suffices to contract the distance between nearby solutions of the linearized equation by a fixed ratio q<1.
  • Nonlinear smoothing holds for the linearized KdV equation as well, not just for the original equation.
  • This supplies the first unique ergodicity result for KdV in L^2; previous results required higher regularity or different noise structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step, not taken in the paper, is to push the same normal-form and observability machinery to white-in-time noise; if the observability inequality survives, exponential mixing for white-forced KdV with arbitrary damping would follow, resolving an open problem noted in the paper.
  • The stabilization theorem is stated for KdV only, but the proof structure—finite-dimensional low-frequency control plus high-frequency nonlinear smoothing—suggests it could be adapted to other one-dimensional dispersive equations whose nonlinearity admits a normal-form smoothing estimate.
  • The argument may be quantitative: the minimal number N of active noise modes is controlled by the observability constant, so estimating that constant for the adjoint equation could predict exactly how many Fourier modes the random forcing must excite.
  • Since the noise is supported on finitely many modes for large frequencies but localized in physical space, the result also indicates that spatial localization of the forcing does not prevent ergodicity as long as enough low modes are stirred.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper establishes exponential mixing, in the dual-Lipschitz metric, for the weakly damped Korteweg–de Vries equation on the torus with bounded, localized, high-frequency-degenerate noise. The main theorem states that if a finite number of low-frequency noise coefficients are all nonzero and the noise strength satisfies the bound (1.5), then the discrete-time Markov process admits a unique invariant measure supported in a bounded subset of H^{1/4+σ}, and the laws of solutions converge to it exponentially fast. The proof combines an abstract asymptotic-compactness/coupling criterion from the authors' prior works [11,33], nonlinear smoothing for the KdV evolution and its linearization via normal-form transformations, and a stabilization result along trajectories: low-frequency controllability derived from a full observability inequality, high-frequency dissipation from nonlinear smoothing, and a new unique continuation property for the Airy equation with a low-regularity potential.

Significance. If correct, this is the first unique ergodicity theorem for KdV at the L^2 regularity level, going beyond the earlier H^m (m≥2) result of Glatt-Holtz, Martinez and Richards. The paper contains substantial original ingredients: nonlinear smoothing for the linearized KdV via normal-form reduction, new bilinear estimates in Bourgain spaces, and a novel unique continuation principle for the Airy equation with an L^∞_t H^{1/4+δ}_x potential. The overall architecture is clear and the dependence of constants is carefully tracked. The main caveats are the heavy reliance on the external coupling framework and on a cited Carleman estimate in the proof of the key observability inequality, neither of which is fully reproduced here.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Lemma 3.4 and Proposition 3.5 (in particular Eq. (3.36))] Lemma 3.4 is the linchpin of the control property and hence of the mixing theorem. Its proof by compactness-uniqueness ultimately rests on the new unique continuation Proposition 3.5. The decisive step in Proposition 3.5 applies the Carleman estimate of [42, Lemma 3.3] to the time-averaged function u_h. This lemma is not stated, its exact hypotheses (function space, boundary conditions, admissible weight ψ) are not listed, and the verification that u_h satisfies them is compressed into one sentence. Since an inapplicable Carleman estimate would invalidate Proposition 3.5, Lemma 3.4, and hence the Main Theorem, the authors should reproduce the Carleman estimate in an appendix and check each hypothesis explicitly for u_h, including the H^3 regularity in space and the boundary conditions at x=0,2π required by the interval formulation of [42].
  2. [§4.1 and §4.3] The proof depends on two imported results: Proposition 4.1, taken from [33, Theorem 2.1], and [11, Lemma 5.3]. While it is acceptable to cite an external theorem, [11, Lemma 5.3] is not even stated; the text merely says 'In view of [11, Lemma 5.3]' and then lists a sufficient property. This lemma is central to converting the deterministic control bound (4.8)–(4.9) into the coupling condition (C). Since [11] is 'to appear' and belongs to the same research group, the authors should state the lemma precisely and either prove it in an appendix or provide a complete, self-contained argument. The same applies to Proposition 4.1: if it is not proved, the exact statement and a public reference with full proof should be supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, Lemma 2.5(4)] The time-localization estimate for Y^s is asserted and the proof is omitted ('We omit further details'). This property is used to pass from local to global well-posedness and in later a priori bounds; a short proof or a precise reference would improve self-containedness.
  2. [§3.1, proof of Lemma 3.4, Step 1] The notation overloads the index n (sequence index) with the projection order N. For example, in (3.12) the conditions ∥φ_1^n∥=1 and the inequality with 1/n are clear, but the later appearance of P_N and P_m in the same proof is easy to confuse. Consider renaming the sequence index, e.g. ℓ.
  3. [§3.1, Proposition 3.5, Step 1] The reduction to smooth v and f is described by saying that mollification 'does not ruin the condition that v=0 on R×ω, up to replacing ω with a smaller open set.' This is plausible but should be justified with a few lines, since the equation and the boundary condition after mollification need to be compatible.
  4. [§3.2, identity (3.38)] The normal-form identity for the linearized equation is central to Proposition 3.6, but the verification is quite terse. The reader must reconstruct which terms correspond to the operators B, I, D and how the boundary terms in Fourier space vanish. A short roadmap after the proof would help.
  5. [References] Reference [11] is listed as 'to appear' without a year. If it has appeared by the time of publication, the full reference should be updated. The same applies to any other unpublished items.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: KdV-specific control and smoothing arguments are carried out in the paper; framework citations are general and not target-encoding.

full rationale

The Main Theorem is not obtained by fitting a parameter and then predicting a closely related quantity, and no object in the proof is defined in terms of the target result. The proof combines a general abstract mixing criterion (Prop. 4.1, cited from [33]) with a general coupling lemma ([11, Lemma 5.3]) and then carries out the KdV-specific work in the present paper: nonlinear smoothing (Prop. 2.9), low-frequency controllability via observability (Lemma 3.4, Prop. 3.2), high-frequency dissipation via normal-form estimates (Prop. 3.6), and the coupling construction (Sec. 4.3). Although [11,33] are works of overlapping authorship, they are used as general, parameter-free statements whose assumptions do not include the KdV conclusion; under the stated rules such citations are independent support and do not by themselves create circularity. The most delicate step, the full observability inequality (Lemma 3.4), is proved in the paper by contradiction, using propagation results from [32] and a new unique-continuation proposition (Prop. 3.5) whose proof invokes a Carleman estimate from [42]. Even if these external estimates are hard and not reproduced, reliance on them is not circular: the paper does not reduce the observability inequality to its own conclusion, nor does it import the KdV ergodicity result from a self-citation. No equation is shown to be equivalent to an input by construction, and no fitted value is renamed as a prediction. Hence the derivation chain is self-contained in the sense relevant to circularity, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proof is fully analytical: no fitted constants, no simulations. The central assumptions are the noise model, the inherited well-posedness theory, and the cited control/probability theorems. The main burden is the external mixing criterion and the cited Carleman/propagation lemmas.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Global well-posedness of deterministic KdV in Bourgain spaces (Proposition 2.1).
    Used throughout Sections 3 and 4; proof only sketched and relies on prior works [1,3,12,24,25].
  • domain assumption Abstract exponential mixing criterion (Proposition 4.1, from [33, Theorem 2.1]).
    The probabilistic engine of the main theorem; stated but not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Carleman estimate of [42, Lemma 3.3].
    Used in Proposition 3.5 Step 2 to finish the unique continuation proof.
  • domain assumption Propagation of compactness and regularity (Propositions A.6 and A.7, from [32, Propositions 3.5 and 3.6]).
    Used in Lemma 3.4 Steps 2-3 to lift regularity of the adjoint solution.
  • domain assumption Noise model: statistically 1-periodic i.i.d. bounded noise with densities rho_{j,k}, rho_{j,k}(0)>0, and low-frequency non-degeneracy (1.6).
    This is the stochastic setting that the theorem assumes; it is not derived.
  • standard math Sobolev product estimates and Bourgain space embedding (Lemmas 2.5-2.6, product estimate (3.27)).
    Standard harmonic analysis facts used throughout; several are cited to [17,32,47].

reviewed 2026-08-04 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exponential mixing for Korteweg-de Vries equation with localized noise." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M6JKY3IX

@misc{pith2026260801863,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exponential mixing for Korteweg-de Vries equation with localized noise},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M6JKY3IX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.01863}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

We establish exponential mixing for the randomly forced and weakly damped KdV equation in $L^2(\mathbb{T})$. The noise is bounded, localized, and degenerate in high frequencies. Our proof relies on a general probabilistic framework in [11,33], nonlinear smoothing for KdV and its linearization via normal form transformation, and stabilization of the system by localized force. This paper continues a series of works connecting asymptotic compactness, control theory, and ergodicity and mixing for randomly forced dispersive PDEs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 4 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. V. Babin, A. A. Ilyin, and E. S. Titi. On the regularization mechanism for the periodic Korteweg-de Vries equation.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 64(5):591–648, 2011

    2011

  2. [2]

    Barbu and G

    V. Barbu and G. Da Prato. The stochastic nonlinear damped wave equation.Appl. Math. Optim., 46(2- 3):125–141, 2002

    2002

  3. [3]

    Bourgain

    J. Bourgain. Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear evolution equations. II. The KdV-equation.Geom. Funct. Anal., 3(3):209–262, 1993

    1993

  4. [4]

    Bourgain

    J. Bourgain. Refinements of Strichartz’ inequality and applications to 2d-NLS with critical nonlinearity. Internat. Math. Res. Notices, 1998(5):253–283, 1998

    1998

  5. [5]

    Bourgain.Global solutions of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations

    J. Bourgain.Global solutions of nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. American Mathematical Society, Provi- dence, RI, 1999

    1999

  6. [6]

    Brze´ zniak, B

    Z. Brze´ zniak, B. Ferrario, and M. Zanella. Ergodic results for the stochastic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation with large damping.J. Evol. Equ., 23(1):Paper No. 19, 31 pp., 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Brze´ zniak, B

    Z. Brze´ zniak, B. Ferrario, and M. Zanella. Invariant measures for a stochastic nonlinear and damped 2D Schr¨ odinger equation.Nonlinearity, 37(1):Paper No. 015001, 66 pp., 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Y. Chen, Z. Liu, S. Xiang, and Z. Zhang. Local large deviations for randomly forced nonlinear wave equations with localized damping.arXiv:2409.11717, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Chen and S

    Y. Chen and S. Xiang. Donsker–Varadhan large deviation principle for locally damped and randomly forced NLS equations.Ann. Henri Poincar´ e, 2026. Online first

    2026

  10. [10]

    Y. Chen, S. Xiang, and Z. Zhang. Exponential mixing for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations perturbed by bounded degenerate noise.arXiv:2604.05911, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  11. [11]

    Y. Chen, S. Xiang, Z. Zhang, and J.-C. Zhao. Exponential mixing for randomly forced NLS equation.Comm. Math. Phys.to appear

  12. [12]

    Colliander, M

    J. Colliander, M. Keel, G. Staffilani, H. Takaoka, and T. Tao. Sharp global well-posedness for KdV and modified KdV onRandT.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 16(3):705–749, 2003

    2003

  13. [13]

    Correia, F

    S. Correia, F. Oliveira, and J. D. Silva. Sharp local well-posedness and nonlinear smoothing for dispersive equations through frequency-restricted estimates.SIAM J. Math. Anal., 56(4):5604–5633, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Debussche

    A. Debussche. Ergodicity results for the stochastic Navier–Stokes equations: an introduction. InTopics in mathematical fluid mechanics, volume 2073 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 23–108. Springer, Heidelberg, 2013

    2073

  15. [15]

    Debussche and C

    A. Debussche and C. Odasso. Ergodicity for a weakly damped stochastic non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation.J. Evol. Equ., 5(3):317–356, 2005

    2005

  16. [16]

    M. B. Erdo˘ gan and N. Tzirakis. Global smoothing for the periodic KdV evolution.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (20):4589–4614, 2013

    2013

  17. [17]

    M. B. Erdo˘ gan and N. Tzirakis.Dispersive partial differential equations: Wellposedness and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    N. E. Glatt-Holtz, V. R. Martinez, and G. Richards. On the long-time statistical behavior of smooth solutions of the weakly damped, stochastically-driven KdV equation.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 379(1):71–136, 2026

    2026

  19. [19]

    O. Goubet. Analyticity of the global attractor for damped forced periodic Korteweg–de Vries equation.J. Differential Equations, 264(4):3052–3066, 2018

    2018

  20. [20]

    Hairer and J

    M. Hairer and J. C. Mattingly. Ergodicity of the 2D Navier-Stokes equations with degenerate stochastic forcing.Ann. of Math. (2), 164(3):993 – 1032, 2006

    2006

  21. [21]

    Hairer and J

    M. Hairer and J. C. Mattingly. Spectral gaps in Wasserstein distances and the 2D stochastic Navier-Stokes equations.Ann. Probab., 36(6):2050 – 2091, 2008

    2050

  22. [22]

    J. P. Isaza, L. J. Mej ´ ıa, and N. Tzvetkov. A smoothing effect and polynomial growth of the Sobolev norms for the KP-II equation.J. Differential Equations, 220(1):1–17, 2006. 36 Y. CHEN, S. XIANG, Z. ZHANG, J.-C. ZHAO

    2006

  23. [23]

    Jakˇ si´ c, V

    V. Jakˇ si´ c, V. Nersesyan, C.-A. Pillet, and A. Shirikyan. Large deviations from a stationary measure for a class of dissipative PDEs with random kicks.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 68(12):2108–2143, 2015

    2015

  24. [24]

    Kappeler and P

    T. Kappeler and P. Topalov. Global wellposedness of KdV inH −1(T,R).Duke Math. J., 135(2):327–360, 2006

    2006

  25. [25]

    Killip and M

    R. Killip and M. Vi¸ san. KdV is well-posed inH −1.Ann. of Math. (2), 190(1):249–305, 2019

    2019

  26. [26]

    Kuksin, V

    S. Kuksin, V. Nersesyan, and A. Shirikyan. Exponential mixing for a class of dissipative PDEs with bounded degenerate noise.Geom. Funct. Anal., 30(1):126–187, 2020

    2020

  27. [27]

    Kuksin and A

    S. Kuksin and A. Shirikyan.Mathematics of two-dimensional turbulence. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2012

    2012

  28. [28]

    S. B. Kuksin. Damped-driven KdV and effective equations for long-time behaviour of its solutions.Geom. Funct. Anal., 20(6):1431–1463, 2010

    2010

  29. [29]

    S. B. Kuksin and A. L. Piatnitski. Khasminskii-Whitham averaging for randomly perturbed KdV equation. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 89(4):400–428, 2008

    2008

  30. [30]

    C. Laurent. Global controllability and stabilization for the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation on an interval. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 16(2):356–379, 2010

    2010

  31. [31]

    Laurent, F

    C. Laurent, F. Linares, and L. Rosier. Control and stabilization of the Benjamin-Ono equation inL 2(T). Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 218(3):1531–1575, 2015

    2015

  32. [32]

    Laurent, L

    C. Laurent, L. Rosier, and B.-Y Zhang. Control and stabilization of the Korteweg-de Vries equation on a periodic domain.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 35(4):707–744, 2010

    2010

  33. [33]

    Z. Liu, D. Wei, S. Xiang, Z. Zhang, and J.-C. Zhao. Exponential mixing for random nonlinear wave equations: weak dissipation and localized control.arXiv:2407.15058, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Z. Liu, S. Xiang, and J.-C. Zhao. Exponential mixing for the Boussinesq equation with Haar coloured noise. J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 2025. Online first

    2025

  35. [35]

    Martirosyan

    D. Martirosyan. Exponential mixing for the white-forced damped nonlinear wave equation.Evol. Equ. Control Theory, 3(4):645–670, 2014

    2014

  36. [36]

    Nersesyan

    V. Nersesyan. The complex Ginzburg-Landau equation perturbed by a force localised both in physical and Fourier spaces.Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5), 25(2):1203–1223, 2024

    2024

  37. [37]

    Nersesyan, D

    V. Nersesyan, D. Zhang, and C. Zhou. On the chaotic behavior of the Lagrangian flow of the 2D Navier–Stokes system with bounded degenerate noise.arXiv:2406.17612, 2024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    J. Niu, M. Wang, and S. Xiang. The periodic KdV with control on space-time measurable sets.J. Funct. Anal., 291(11):Paper No. 111621, 2026

    2026

  39. [39]

    Niu and S

    J. Niu and S. Xiang. Small-time local controllability of a KdV system for all critical lengths.arXiv:2501.13640, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Oh and A

    S. Oh and A. G. Stefanov. Smoothing and growth bound of periodic generalized Korteweg–De Vries equation. J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ., 18(4):899–930, 2021

    2021

  41. [41]

    L. Rosier. Exact boundary controllability for the Korteweg-de Vries equation on a bounded domain.ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var., 2:33–55, 1997

    1997

  42. [42]

    Rosier and B.-Y

    L. Rosier and B.-Y. Zhang. Global stabilization of the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation posed on a finite domain.SIAM J. Control Optim., 45(3):927–956, 2006

    2006

  43. [43]

    D. L. Russell and B.-Y. Zhang. Exact controllability and stabilizability of the Korteweg-de Vries equation. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 348(9):3643–3672, 1996

    1996

  44. [44]

    Shirikyan

    A. Shirikyan. Control and mixing for 2D Navier-Stokes equations with space-time localised noise.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er, 48(2):253–280, 2015

    2015

  45. [45]

    Shirikyan

    A. Shirikyan. Controllability implies mixing II. Convergence in the dual-Lipschitz metric.J. Eur. Math. Soc., 23(4):1381–1422, 2021

    2021

  46. [46]

    Sun and N

    C. Sun and N. Tzvetkov. Almost sure global nonlinear smoothing for the 2D NLS.arXiv:2512.13088, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Tao.Nonlinear dispersive equations, volume 106 ofCBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics

    T. Tao.Nonlinear dispersive equations, volume 106 ofCBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006. (Yuxuan Chen)School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China. Email address:chen yuxuan@pku.edu.cn (Shengquan Xiang)School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, 100871, B...

    2006

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 4, 2026.