Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 74 references

Laskar's frequency map analysis revisited

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that frequency map analysis recovers fundamental frequencies from analytic quasi-periodic signals with an error that decays exponentially in the window length, given a Diophantine frequency vector.

desk verdict The finite-dimensional exponential bound for FMA is likely correct and genuinely new, but the proof's core relies on an unproved imported derivative estimate; a referee should verify that before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02182 v1 pith:QG7Q3RFR submitted 2026-08-03 math.DS astro-ph.EPmath-phmath.MP

Zhicheng Tong , Yong Li This is my paper
classification math.DSastro-ph.EPmath-phmath.MP MSC 37J4070H1270H0837K5570-0837M99
keywords frequencymapanalysisexponentialconvergencequasi-periodicfunctionsDiophantineconditionBrjunoalmostperiodicweightedBirkhoffaveragesweighting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Frequency map analysis is a standard numerical method for extracting oscillation frequencies from short time windows, originally shown to converge only polynomially. The paper claims that for analytic quasi-periodic signals whose frequency vector satisfies a Diophantine condition, the recovered frequency error drops like exp(-c T^zeta), where zeta depends on the Diophantine exponent and on the shape of the weighting function. This would strictly improve the classical polynomial bounds, making the method dramatically more accurate on long windows. The same strategy is extended to Brjuno nonresonance and to analytic almost-periodic signals with infinite frequency sets under weighted-lattice spatial structures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the generalized exponential weighting function w_{p,q}(x) = c_2 exp(-(1+x)^{-p}(1-x)^{-q}), a smooth filter that vanishes flat at the boundaries. Its relevant property is a bound on the L^1 norms of high derivatives: ||D^l w_{p,q}||_{L^1} <= lambda^l l^{beta l}, with beta = 1 + 1/min{p,q}. This derivative control lets the proof optimize the number of integration-by-parts steps as approximately l_* ~ T^zeta, turning the polynomial small-divisor factors into exponential decay. The index split ||k|| <= T^zeta separates the principal part, controlled by the flatness of the weight and the Diophantine condition, from the remainder, controlled solely by analyticity.

What would settle it

Take a concrete analytic quasi-periodic function with a known Diophantine frequency vector, compute the frequency map estimate nu_T^1 numerically for increasing window lengths T, and check whether |nu_T^1 - nu_1| decays like exp(-c T^zeta) for a range of positive c; alternatively, directly test the bound ||D^l w_{p,q}||_{L^1} <= lambda^l l^{beta l} for large l by symbolic or numerical differentiation, since one counterexample would disable Lemma 2.3.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.2: for an analytic quasi-periodic function f(t) = e^{i nu_1 t} + sum_k a_k e^{i<k,nu>t} with Diophantine frequency vector nu, and for the generalized exponential weighting function w_{p,q}(x) = c_2 exp(-(1+x)^{-p}(1-x)^{-q}), the frequency map analysis error satisfies nu_T^1 - nu_1 = O(e^{-c I T^zeta}) with zeta = (tau + beta)^{-1}, where beta = 1 + 1/min{p,q}. The proof splits the Fourier index set at ||k|| <= T^zeta. For the small-index part it applies repeated integration by parts to the weighting function, using both the Diophantine lower bound on frequency mismatches and a claimed bound on high derivatives of w_{p,q}; for the large-index part it relies on

Load-bearing premise

The exponential conclusions hinge on an unproved bound on the L^1 norms of high derivatives of the weighting function w_{p,q}; if that bound fails, the integration-by-parts argument in Lemma 2.3 stops producing exponential decay and the stated rates no longer follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Observation windows of modestly increased length now provably give exponentially better frequency resolution for analytic quasi-periodic signals, rather than the former power-law improvement.
  • The exponent zeta makes explicit the trade-off: larger Diophantine exponent tau or less flat weighting functions slow the exponential rate, while flatter weights accelerate it.
  • The Brjuno extension replaces Diophantine lower bounds with the weakest classical nonresonance condition, giving errors of the form exp(-c log T log log T) even when power-law small divisors are absent.
  • The almost-periodic extensions show the same convergence mechanism works for infinite frequency sets with weighted spatial structures, connecting the rate to the growth of the spatial weight.
  • The techniques transfer directly to weighted Birkhoff averages, linking exponential acceleration results in ergodic and numerical analysis to frequency map analysis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof rests on an auxiliary derivative bound for w_{p,q} that is imported without proof from a companion paper; verifying this bound directly for specific p and q would be the fastest way to test whether the exponential claims are fully supported.
  • The paper proves upper bounds but not optimality; numerical tests on a known two-frequency analytic signal could reveal whether the predicted zeta is sharp or whether a different exponent governs the actual error decay in practice.
  • The general-lattice result suggests a design principle: one can choose the weighting function to match the spatial structure of the frequency set, potentially yielding application-specific filters with customized convergence rates.
  • Since the paper is purely theoretical, a natural testable extension is to compare the empirical frequency error against the predicted exp(-c T^zeta) rate for a few simple analytic signals, which would also illuminate the size of the prefactor.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper revisits Laskar's frequency map analysis (FMA) and claims exponential convergence for analytic quasi-periodic and almost-periodic signals when the parameterized Laskar weighting function w_{p,q}^{Las} is used. Theorem 1.2 states that, under a Diophantine condition with exponent τ, the first-frequency error satisfies |ν_T^1 − ν_1| = O(e^{−c_I T^ζ}) with ζ = (τ + β)^{-1} and β = 1 + 1/min{p,q}, improving the classical polynomial bound of Theorem 1.1. Theorem 1.3 gives an exp(−c log T / log log T) rate under a Brjuno condition. Theorems 1.4 and 1.5 extend the result to analytic almost-periodic functions on Bourgain-type and general lattices, with rates depending on the spatial weight Φ. The proofs split the Fourier index set into a small-divisor principal part and a tail, then optimize the number of integrations by parts after applying Laskar's transform to the weighted window.

Significance. If the main theorems are correct, the paper gives the first exponential convergence rates for Laskar's frequency map analysis, with explicit dependence on the arithmetic of the frequency vector, the analyticity radius, the anisotropy of the spatial lattice, and the parameters p, q of the weighting function. The two-scale decomposition and the optimization of the integration-by-parts order are natural and the main rate in Theorem 1.2 is sharp-looking: the exponent ζ = (τ+β)^{-1} arises from exactly balancing the Diophantine denominator against the factorial-type derivative growth. The paper is a theoretical contribution and does not contain numerical experiments, code, or machine-checked proofs. Its central claims are falsifiable in the sense that explicit rates are stated. However, as detailed below, several load-bearing technical inputs are imported from the authors' previous papers or only sketched, so the manuscript needs substantial revision before the claims are fully supported.

major comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (2.8) and Lemma 2.3] The principal-part estimate rests on the L^1 derivative bound ∥D^l w∥_{L^1} ≤ λ^l l^{β l} with β = 1 + 1/min{p,q}, imported from [TL25b, Lemma 4.1]. Footnote 8 only says the weight functions 'differ slightly in form' and that the analysis is 'parallel.' This bound is load-bearing: the chosen order ι* and the final exponent ζ depend precisely on β. The manuscript should either state and prove the bound for the actual w_{p,q}^{Las}, or give an exact statement with the constants and the adaptation spelled out. Without that, Lemma 2.3 and hence Theorems 1.2–1.5 are unsupported at their central point.
  2. [§2.3, Lemma 2.7 and §2.4, Lemma 2.9] The small-divisor estimates are applied to k rather than to k − e_1. Since Ω_k = ⟨k,ν⟩ − ν_1 = ⟨k − e_1,ν⟩, the infinite-dimensional Diophantine condition (1.6) must be applied to k − e_1. This matters already for k = 0 (which belongs to Θ) and for k with zero first component, where k − e_1 has one extra non-zero component. In the quasi-periodic proof this shift is handled explicitly via k* = k − (1,0,...,0); the almost-periodic proofs do not do the analogous step. The omission is probably repairable by absorbing an extra constant in the denominator, but as written the displayed lower bounds in Lemmas 2.7 and 2.9 do not follow from (1.6).
  3. [§2.3, Eq. (2.22)] The summability argument uses the cardinality estimate #{k∈Θ : |k|_η=ϑ} ≲ ϑ^{ϑ^{1/η}}, imported from [TL24b, Lemma 8.4]. This is a second unproved technical input in a chain of new claims. The manuscript should state this estimate as a lemma and either prove it or give a precise reference with the exact hypotheses. In addition, the sentence 'for any constant c_{22} > 0' is not correct: from |a_k| ≤ C_f e^{−r|k|_η} one can dominate by e^{−c_{22}|k|_η} only for c_{22} ≤ r. The later use in Lemma 2.8 requires c_{22} < r, so the quantification should be fixed.
  4. [§2.4, Case (III) of Theorem 1.5] The proof of Case (III) is only a verbal construction: one is told to choose K(T) large and Γ(K(T)) small, and then 'such a Φ(x)' exists. No rigorous construction is given for a single increasing Φ satisfying the standing assumptions, Λ(x)=x, the truncation equation (2.30), and the two inequalities displayed before the final estimate. Since Case (III) asserts that arbitrarily fast sub-exponential rates I(T) with I(x)=o(x^β) are attainable, this requires a real existence proof, not a heuristic. Please provide a concrete family of Φ or a fixed-point/selection argument.
  5. [Theorem 1.4 statement vs. proof] The theorem states a rate for any ρ < 1 + η, but the proof in Lemma 2.7 uses the decomposition with |k|_η ≤ (log T)^ρ and explicitly requires 2 ≤ ρ < 1 + η. If ρ < 2 is intended, an additional argument is needed; if not, the statement should be restricted to ρ ∈ [2, 1+η). The same issue affects the final sentence of the proof, where '2 ≤ ρ < 1 + η can be chosen arbitrarily' is not equivalent to the stated quantifier.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1, Eq. (2.10)] The transition from (2.9) to (2.10) drops the factor 2 coming from the Leibniz-rule estimate. This is harmless if c_2 is redefined to absorb it, but as written the inequality has an extra factor 2.
  2. [§1, notation] The symbol ν_1 is used both for the first scalar frequency in the leading term e^{iν_1t} and as the first component of the frequency vector ν in the Diophantine condition. The distinction is clear from context but deserves a sentence, especially because the almost-periodic setting uses ν_1 in both senses as well.
  3. [§2.1, Lemma 2.2] The use of the implicit function theorem at the point (0,+∞) in the compactified domain is not standard. A short rescaling argument, for example setting s=1/T and applying the usual IFT on a neighborhood of (0,0), would make the step rigorous and easier to follow.
  4. [§1.2, footnote 8] The sentence about the weighting functions differing slightly should be expanded. Since this difference is the only justification for transferring [TL25b, Lemma 4.1], the reader needs to know exactly how w_{p,q}^{Las} relates to the weight analyzed there.
  5. [§2.2, Theorem 1.3] The final constant c_II is said to be 'arbitrarily large.' This is a qualitative statement; it would be clearer to write that for every prescribed C>0 the bound holds with c_II ≥ C for T large enough.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the exponential-rate claim is a new derivation; the cited technical lemmas are independent parameter-free bounds, not re-statements of the target result.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. Theorem 1.2 is a new asymptotic statement: the error ν_T^1 − ν_1 is nowhere used as an input. The proof's main estimate, Lemma 2.3, rests on the L^1 derivative bound (2.8) imported from [TL25b, Lemma 4.1]. That lemma concerns the weighting function alone—∥D^l w∥_{L^1} ≤ λ^l l^{βl}—not the frequency-map error, and its assumptions do not include the theorem being proved. Likewise, Lemma 2.7 uses the lattice-counting bound from [TL24b, Lemma 8.4], which is an independent cardinality estimate for the infinite lattice, not a conclusion about FMA convergence. The optimization of ι in (2.10)–(2.11) is straightforward algebra given (2.8): the choice c_3 = e^{-1} c_2^{-1/β} cancels the algebraic T-powers exactly and leaves exp(−β c_3 T^ζ). There is no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem invoked to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation that is equivalent to the target theorem. The one legitimate concern is support rather than circularity: footnote 8 says only 'the weighting functions differ slightly in form, the analysis remains parallel,' so the exact validity of (2.8) for w_{p,q}^{Las} is not proved here. But a verification gap is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. Because the central claim has independent mathematical content and the cited items are external technical lemmas with stated assumptions that do not include the target result, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; all constants are existential bounds. The main external inputs are two technical lemmas from the authors' previous papers, plus standard analytic and small-divisor assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced; the general lattice Z^N_Φ is a mathematical definition, not an invented physical object.

assumptions (5)
  • ad hoc to paper Derivative bounds on Laskar weighting: ∥D^l w_{p,q}^{Las}∥_{L^1} ≤ λ^l l^{β l}, β=1+1/min{p,q}, for all l∈N^+.
    Imported from [TL25b, Lemma 4.1]; not proved in this paper, used to control integration-by-parts remainders in Lemma 2.3 and all subsequent theorems.
  • ad hoc to paper Cardinality estimate for Bourgain lattice: #{k∈Z^N_* : |k|_η=ϑ} ≲ ϑ^{ϑ^{1/η}}.
    Imported from [TL24b, Lemma 8.4]; used in Lemma 2.7 to sum exponential weights over infinite-dimensional index sets.
  • domain assumption Analytic quasi-periodic ansatz: f(t)=e^{iν1t}+Σ a_k e^{i⟨k,ν⟩t} with |a_k|≤C_f e^{-r||k||_ℓ1}.
    Stated as the analytic quasi-periodic regime in Theorem 1.2 and Remark 1.1; this is the function class for which the exponential rate is claimed.
  • domain assumption Diophantine/Brjuno/infinite-dimensional nonresonance conditions (1.2), (1.3)–(1.4), (1.6).
    These small-divisor assumptions enter every lower bound on |x(T)+Ω_kT|; without them the principal-part sum cannot be controlled exponentially.
  • standard math Implicit function theorem, Lebesgue dominated convergence, Riemann–Lebesgue lemma.
    Used in Lemma 2.2 to obtain x(T) solving F(x(T),T)=0 near x=0 and to justify interchange of limits and sums.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Laskar's frequency map analysis revisited." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QG7Q3RFR

@misc{pith2026260802182,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Laskar's frequency map analysis revisited},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QG7Q3RFR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02182}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we establish the exponential convergence of Laskar's pioneering frequency map analysis, strictly improving upon classical polynomial bounds. By utilizing appropriately chosen weighting functions, we achieve such exponential rates in the analytic quasi-periodic regime for frequency vectors satisfying Diophantine or Brjuno nonresonance conditions. Furthermore, we extend the theoretical framework beyond the analytic quasi-periodic regime into the analytic almost periodic setting. By employing and generalizing Bourgain's framework, we accommodate a much broader class of anisotropic spatial structures. These results yield the first unified theory of exponential convergence for frequency map analysis, revealing the interplay among analyticity, spatial structures, nonresonance conditions, the choice of weighting functions, and convergence rates. This framework has important implications for applications in fields including celestial mechanics. Moreover, the novel techniques developed herein yield new insights into the study of weighted Birkhoff averages.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Baroni, R

    R. Baroni, R. de Carvalho, J. Junior, I. Caldas, Shearless barriers in the conservative Ikeda map. Phys. Rev. E 112 (2025), Paper No. 054212, 11 pp. https://doi.org/10.1103/q3hf-jm99

    doi:10.1103/q3hf-jm99 2025

  2. [2]

    Bazzani, F

    A. Bazzani, F. Capoani, M. Giovannozzi, Analysis of adiabatic trapping phenomena for quasi-integrable area-preserving maps in the presence of time-dependent exciters. Phys. Rev. E 106 (2022), Paper No. 034204. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.106.034204

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.034204 2022

  3. [3]

    Bazzani, M

    A. Bazzani, M. Giovannozzi, C. Montanari, G. Turchetti, Performance analysis of indicators of chaos for nonlinear dynamical systems. Phys. Rev. E 107 (2023), Paper No. 064209. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.064209

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.107.064209 2023

  4. [4]

    Boodram, D

    O. Boodram, D. Henry, D. Scheeres, Rapid computation and identification of rotational invariant curves on the Keplerian map. Conference: 2025 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference. At: Boston, Massachusetts. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394284979

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Boodram, D

    O. Boodram, D. Henry, D. Scheeres, Identifying cislunar transport barriers with Keplerian maps. Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 138 (2026), Paper No. 43, 32 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-026-10318-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s10569-026-10318-x 2026

  6. [6]

    Bou-Sakr-El-Tayar, J

    M. Bou-Sakr-El-Tayar, J. Bramburger, M. Colbrook, Weighted Birkhoff averages accelerate data-driven methods. Proc. A 482 (2026), Paper No. 20250979, 19 pp. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2025.0979

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Bounemoura, Some remarks on the optimality of the Bruno-R\"ussmann condition

    A. Bounemoura, Some remarks on the optimality of the Bruno-R\"ussmann condition. Bull. Soc. Math. France 147 (2019), pp. 341--353. https://doi.org/10.24033/bsmf.2784

    work page doi:10.24033/bsmf.2784 2019

  8. [8]

    Bounemoura, J

    A. Bounemoura, J. F\' e joz, KAM, -Gevrey regularity and the -Bruno-R\" u ssmann condition. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 19 (2019), pp. 1225--1279. https://doi.org/10.2422/2036-2145.201707_009

    arXiv 2019

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    Bounemoura, J

    A. Bounemoura, J. F\' e joz, Hamiltonian perturbation theory for ultra-differentiable functions. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 270 (2021), v+89 pp. https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1319

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Bourgain, On invariant tori of full dimension for 1D periodic NLS

    J. Bourgain, On invariant tori of full dimension for 1D periodic NLS. J. Funct. Anal. 229 (2005), pp. 62--94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2004.10.019

    2005 doi

  3. [11]

    Calleja, A

    R. Calleja, A. Celletti, J. Gimeno, R. de la Llave, Accurate computations up to breakdown of quasi-periodic attractors in the dissipative spin-orbit problem. J. Nonlinear Sci. 34 (2024), Paper No. 12, 38 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-023-09988-w

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Celletti, C

    A. Celletti, C. Froeschl \'e , E. Lega, Frequency analysis of the stability of asteroids in the framework of the restricted three-body problem. Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 90 (2004), pp. 245--266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-0552-z

    2004 doi

  5. [13]

    Celletti, C

    A. Celletti, C. Froeschl \'e , E. Lega, Dissipative and weakly-dissipative regimes in nearly-integrable mappings. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 16 (2006), pp. 757--781. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2006.16.757

    2006 doi

  6. [14]

    Chandre, S

    C. Chandre, S. Wiggins, T. Uzer, Time-frequency analysis of chaotic systems. Physica D 181 (2003), pp. 171--196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(03)00117-9

    2003 doi

  7. [15]

    Corsi, G

    L. Corsi, G. Gentile, M. Procesi, Maximal tori in infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems: a renormalisation group approach. Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 29 (2024), pp. 677--715. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560354724540025

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    S. Das, Y. Saiki, E. Sander, J. Yorke, Quantitative quasiperiodicity. Nonlinearity 30 (2017), pp. 4111--4140. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/aa84c2

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    S. Das, J. Yorke, Super convergence of ergodic averages for quasiperiodic orbits. Nonlinearity 31 (2018), pp. 491--501. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6544/aa99a0

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Dolgopyat, B

    D. Dolgopyat, B. Fayad, J. Paradela, Kolmogorov invariant torus theorem for weakly interacting particles I: Full dimensional tori. Preprint, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.15928

    2026 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    Duignan, J

    N. Duignan, J. Meiss, Distinguishing between regular and chaotic orbits of flows by the weighted Birkhoff average. Phys. D 449 (2023), 16 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2023.133749

    2023

  12. [20]

    Dumas, J

    H. Dumas, J. Laskar, Global dynamics and long-time stability in Hamiltonian systems via numerical frequency analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993), pp. 2975--2979. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2975

    1993 doi

  13. [21]

    Y. Fu, J. Laskar, Frequency analysis and representation of slowly diffusing planetary solutions. Astron. Astrophys. 628 (2019), Paper No. A84. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730492

    2019 doi

  14. [22]

    Giorgilli, U

    A. Giorgilli, U. Locatelli, M. Sansottera, Kolmogorov and Nekhoroshev theory for the problem of three bodies. Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 104 (2009), pp. 159--173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-009-9192-7

    2009 doi

  15. [23]

    Z. Gui, P. Zhu, D. Escande, Hamiltonian estimation of island width threshold for stochasticity onset on edge pedestal top in presence of a resonant magnetic perturbation. Phys. Plasmas 33 (2026), Paper No. 022502, 17 pp. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0307633

    2026 doi

  16. [24]

    J. Hao, Z. Xu, J. Zu, A deep learning framework for identifying weakly chaotic, strongly chaotic, resonant and non-resonant orbits in the generalized kicked rotator. Phys. D 496 (2026), Paper No. 135336, 16 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2026.135336

    2026

  17. [25]

    Hwang, C

    K. Hwang, C. Mitchell, R. Ryne, Rapidly converging chaos indicator for studying dynamic aperture in a storage ring with space charge. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23 (2020), Paper No. 084601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.084601

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Laskar, Secular evolution of the solar system over 10 million years, Astron

    J. Laskar, Secular evolution of the solar system over 10 million years, Astron. Astmphys. 198 (1988), pp. 341--362

    1988

  19. [27]

    Laskar, The chaotic motion of the solar system: A numerical estimate of the size of the chaotic zones

    J. Laskar, The chaotic motion of the solar system: A numerical estimate of the size of the chaotic zones. Icarus 88 (1990), pp. 266--291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(90)90084-M

    1990 doi

  20. [28]

    Laskar, Frequency analysis for multi-dimensional systems

    J. Laskar, Frequency analysis for multi-dimensional systems. Global dynamics and diffusion. Phys. D 67 (1993), pp. 257--281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90210-R

    1993 doi

  21. [29]

    Laskar, Frequency analysis of a dynamical system

    J. Laskar, Frequency analysis of a dynamical system. Qualitative and quantitative behaviour of planetary systems (Ramsau, 1992). Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom. 56 (1993), pp. 191--196. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00699731

    1992 doi

  22. [30]

    Laskar, Introduction to frequency map analysis

    J. Laskar, Introduction to frequency map analysis. Hamiltonian systems with three or more degrees of freedom (S'Agar\' o , 1995), pp. 134--150, NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci., 533, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1999. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4673-9_13

    1995 doi

  23. [31]

    Laskar, Frequency map analysis and particle accelerators

    J. Laskar, Frequency map analysis and particle accelerators. Proc. 2003 Particle Accelerator Conf. 1 (2003), pp. 378--382. https://doi.org/10.1109/PAC.2003.1288929

    2003 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Laskar, Frequency map analysis and quasiperiodic decompositions

    J. Laskar, Frequency map analysis and quasiperiodic decompositions. Proceedings of Porquerolles School, 2001. Preprint, 2003. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.math/0305364

    2001 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Laskar, A

    J. Laskar, A. Correia, M. Gastineau, F. Joutel, B. Levrard, P. Robutel, Long term evolution and chaotic diffusion of the insolation quantities of Mars. Icarus 170 (2004), pp. 343--364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2004.04.005

    2004 doi

  26. [34]

    Laskar, C

    J. Laskar, C. Froeschl\'e, A. Celletti, The measure of chaos by the numerical analysis of the fundamental frequencies. Application to the standard mapping. Physica D 56 (1992), pp. 253--269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90028-L

    1992 doi

  27. [35]

    Laskar, P

    J. Laskar, P. Robutel, The chaotic obliquity of the planets. Nature 361 (1993), pp. 608--612. https://doi.org/10.1038/361608a0

    1993 doi

  28. [36]

    Laskar, P

    J. Laskar, P. Robutel, F. Joutel, M. Gastineau, A. Correia, B. Levrard, A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth. Astron. Astrophys. 428 (2004), pp. 261--285. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335

    2004 doi

  29. [37]

    E. Lega, C. Froeschl\'e, Numerical investigations of the structure around an invariant KAM torus using the frequency map analysis. Phys. D 95 (1996), pp. 97--106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(96)00046-2

    1996 doi

  30. [38]

    Lema\^itre, N

    A. Lema\^itre, N. Delsate, S. Valk, A web of secondary resonances for large A/m geostationary debris. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 104 (2009), pp. 383--402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-009-9217-2

    2009 doi

  31. [39]

    Y. Li, Y. Hao, K. Hwang, R. Rainer, A. He, A. Liu, Fast dynamic aperture optimization with forward-reversal integration. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research. Section A, Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 988 (2020). https://doi.org...

    2020

  32. [40]

    Mastroianni, U

    R. Mastroianni, U. Locatelli, Secular orbital dynamics of the innermost exoplanet of the -Andromed system. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 135 (2023), Paper No. 28, 41 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-023-10141-8

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    Meiss, E

    J. Meiss, E. Sander, Birkhoff averages and the breakdown of invariant tori in volume-preserving maps. Phys. D 428 (2021), Paper No. 133048, 20 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2021.133048

    2021

  34. [42]

    Meiss, E

    J. Meiss, E. Sander, Resonance and weak chaos in quasiperiodically-forced circle maps. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 142 (2025), Paper No. 108562, 20 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2024.108562

    2025

  35. [43]

    Montalto, M

    R. Montalto, M. Procesi, Linear Schr\"odinger equation with an almost periodic potential. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53 (2021), pp. 386--434. https://doi.org/10.1137/20M1320742

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    Montanari, R

    C. Montanari, R. Appleby, A. Bazzani, A. Fornara, M. Giovannozzi, S. Redaelli, G. Sterbini, G. Turchetti, Chaos indicators for nonlinear dynamics in circular particle accelerators. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 603 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-06552-1

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    Papaphilippou, Detecting chaos in particle accelerators through the frequency map analysis method

    Y. Papaphilippou, Detecting chaos in particle accelerators through the frequency map analysis method. Chaos 24 (2014), Paper No. 024412. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4884495

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    Papaphilippou, J

    Y. Papaphilippou, J. Laskar, Frequency map analysis and global dynamics in a galactic potential with two degrees of freedom. Astron. Astrophys. 307 (1996), pp. 427--449

    1996

  39. [47]

    Papaphilippou, J

    Y. Papaphilippou, J. Laskar, Global dynamics of triaxial galactic models through frequency map analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 329 (1998), pp. 451--481

    1998

  40. [48]

    P\"oschel, Small divisors with spatial structure in infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems

    J. P\"oschel, Small divisors with spatial structure in infinite-dimensional Hamiltonian systems. Comm. Math. Phys. 127 (1990), pp. 351--393. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104180143

    1990

  41. [49]

    P\"oschel, A lecture on the classical KAM theorem

    J. P\"oschel, A lecture on the classical KAM theorem. Smooth ergodic theory and its applications (Seattle, WA, 1999), pp. 707--732, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 69, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2001

    1999

  42. [50]

    P\"oschel, KAM \`a la R

    J. P\"oschel, KAM \`a la R. Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 16 (2011), pp. 17--23. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560354710520060

    2011 doi

  43. [51]

    Price-Whelan, K

    A. Price-Whelan, K. Johnston, M. Valluri, S. Pearson, A. K\"upper, D. Hogg, Chaotic dispersal of tidal debris. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455 (2016), pp. 1079--1098. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2383

    2016 doi

  44. [52]

    Prieur, P

    A. Prieur, P. Robutel, Marchal's family of periodic orbits I: Stability of inclined co-orbital planetary systems. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 138 (2026), Paper No. 19, 28 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-026-10292-4

    2026 doi

  45. [53]

    Robin, C

    D. Robin, C. Steier, J. Laskar, L. Nadolski, Global dynamics of the advanced light source revealed through experimental frequency map analysis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), pp. 558--561. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.558

    2000 doi

  46. [54]

    Robutel, J

    P. Robutel, J. Laskar, Frequency map and global dynamics in the solar system I - Short period dynamics of massless particles. Icarus 152 (2001), pp. 4--28. https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.2000.6576

    2001

  47. [55]

    Robutel, N

    P. Robutel, N. Rambaux, M. El Moutamid, Influence of the coorbital resonance on the rotation of the Trojan satellites of Saturn. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 113 (2012), pp. 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-012-9406-2

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    R\"ussmann, KAM iteration with nearly infinitely small steps in dynamical systems of polynomial character

    H. R\"ussmann, KAM iteration with nearly infinitely small steps in dynamical systems of polynomial character. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 3 (2010), pp. 683--718. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdss.2010.3.683

    2010 doi

  49. [57]

    M. Ruth, D. Bindel, Finding Birkhoff averages via adaptive filtering. Chaos 34 (2024), Paper No. 123109, 20 pp. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0215396

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    M. Ruth, J. Kulik, J. Burby, Robust computation of higher-dimensional invariant tori from individual trajectories. Chaos 36 (2026), Paper No. 033143, 25 pp. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0310396

    2026 doi

  51. [59]

    Salamon, The Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser theorem

    D. Salamon, The Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser theorem. Math. Phys. Electron. J. 10 (2004), Paper 3, 37 pp

    2004

  52. [60]

    Sander, J

    E. Sander, J. Meiss, Birkhoff averages and rotational invariant circles for area-preserving maps. Phys. D 411 (2020), Paper No. 132569, 19 pp. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2020.132569

    2020

  53. [61]

    Sander, J

    E. Sander, J. Meiss, Computing Lyapunov exponents using weighted Birkhoff averages. J. Phys. A 58 (2025), Paper No. 355701, 17 pp. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/adfac1

    2025 doi

  54. [62]

    Sander, J

    E. Sander, J. Meiss, Proportions of incommensurate, resonant, and chaotic orbits for torus maps. Chaos 35 (2025), Paper No. 013147, 15 pp. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0226617

    2025 doi

  55. [63]

    Schwartz, Analyse, t

    L. Schwartz, Analyse, t. II. Calcul diff\'erentiel et \'equations diff\'erentielles, Hermann, Paris, 1992

    1992

  56. [64]

    Tong, Exponential convergence can happen in weighted Birkhoff averages via quasi-periodicity with arbitrary nonresonance and low regularity

    Z. Tong, Exponential convergence can happen in weighted Birkhoff averages via quasi-periodicity with arbitrary nonresonance and low regularity. To appear in Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.21950

    doi arXiv

  57. [65]

    Z. Tong, Y. Li, Towards sharp regularity: Full-dimensional tori in C^ vector fields over T ^ . Preprint, 2023; revised, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.08211

    2023 doi arXiv

  58. [66]

    Z. Tong, Y. Li, Exponential convergence of the weighted Birkhoff average. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 188 (2024), pp. 470--492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2024.06.003

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    Z. Tong, Y. Li, Weighted multiple ergodic averages via analytic observables over T ^ : Is exponential pointwise convergence universal? Preprint, 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.02866

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    Z. Tong, Y. Li, A note on exponential convergence of Ces\` a ro weighted Birkhoff average and multimodal weighted approach. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 41 (2025), pp. 2301--2323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10114-025-3365-5

    2025 doi

  61. [69]

    Z. Tong, Y. Li, Quantitative uniform exponential acceleration of averages along decaying waves. Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk Ser. Mat. 89 (2025), pp. 131--161; reprinted in Izv. Math. 89 (2025), pp. 1208--1238. https://doi.org/10.4213/im9666e

    2025 doi

  62. [70]

    Z. Tong, Y. Li, Weighted Birkhoff averages: Deterministic and probabilistic perspectives. Math. Ann. 394 (2026), Paper No. 18, 46 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-026-03311-0

    2026 doi

  63. [71]

    Z. Tong, Y. Li, Optimal rates of uniform convergence for weighted Birkhoff averages via almost all rotations. Preprint, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.06907

    2026 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    S. Valk, N. Delsate, A. Lema\^ i tre, T. Carletti, Global dynamics of high area-to-mass ratios GEO space debris by means of the MEGNO indicator. Adv. Space Res. 43 (2009), pp. 1509--1526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.02.014

    2009 doi

  65. [73]

    Vela-Arevalo, S

    L. Vela-Arevalo, S. Wiggins, Time-frequency analysis of classical trajectories of polyatomic molecules. Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 11 (2001), pp. 1359--1380. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127401002766

    2001 doi

  66. [74]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. Zhu, H. Liu, Y. Suzuki, C. Hegna, Y. Xu, Identification of MHD equilibrium limits for CFQS plasmas. Preprint, 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.26675

    2026 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.