Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 86 references

Superconducting ternary compounds Li-X-B (X=Mo, W) within the mild pressure range: First-principles predictions

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-04 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding lithium to tungsten borides yields ~11 K superconductors that may form near ambient pressure instead of 100 GPa.

desk verdict The EPC predictions are plausible and the search heuristic is honestly presented, but the 'pressure reduced to 0 GPa' claim rests on a 0.019 eV/atom hull distance that is inside GGA noise. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.02362 v1 pith:VJFOMEOH submitted 2026-08-03 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Bangshuai Zhu , Juefei Wu , Dexi Shao , Junjie Wang , Yu Han , Cuiying Pei , Qi Wang , Jian Sun
show 1 more author
Yanpeng Qi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords highpressuresuperconductivityternaryborideslithiumtungstenboridemolybdenumcrystalstructurepredictionfirst-principlescalculationselectron-phononcouplingcompositionlines
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that lithium insertion into tungsten borides creates two superconducting phases, Li2WB6 and Li2WB4, with critical temperatures around 11 K. The key claim is that these phases stabilize at mild pressures (0–20 GPa), whereas the parent compound WB2 superconducts only around 100 GPa. If correct, lithium offers a chemical route to preserve superconductivity while drastically lowering the pressure needed for synthesis. The paper also introduces a 'ternary composition lines' strategy to efficiently search ternary phase diagrams and tests it against a full ternary search.

What carries the argument

The ternary composition lines (TCLs) strategy: a guided search along pseudobinary joints (e.g., LiB-WB, Li-WB2) that focuses computational effort on low-energy regions of the ternary convex hull, combined with density functional theory, phonon calculations, and Eliashberg-based Tc estimates. The structural motif carrying the superconductivity is the flat honeycomb boron layer with W atoms coupling to boron vibrations, analogous to WB2 P6/mmm.

What would settle it

A synthesis experiment starting from LiB and WB4 at 0–20 GPa (or laser-heated in a diamond anvil cell) that fails to produce Li2WB6 or Li2WB4, or produces them but with no superconducting transition near 11 K, would contradict the central prediction. Alternatively, a full ternary convex hull calculation with a more accurate functional (e.g., HSE or RPA) that pushes the hull distance well above 0.05 eV/atom would weaken the stability claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

First-principles calculations combined with crystal structure prediction identify Li2WB6 (P6/mmm) and Li2WB4 (R-3m) as dynamically stable, metastable phases whose electron-phonon coupling gives Tc around 11 K. The authors argue that lithium atoms act as a 'dilution' of tungsten in the WB2 P6/mmm structure, maintaining the flat boron honeycomb layers and key W-B couplings while reducing the stabilization pressure from about 100 GPa to 0 GPa for Li2WB6 and 20 GPa for Li2WB4. They also report that Li4MoB2 shows an anomalous increase in Tc under compression, from 0.17 K at 0 GPa to 3.3 K at 40 GPa.

Load-bearing premise

The predicted lithium-tungsten borides are only metastable by about 0.02 eV/atom, which is within the error bar of the density functional theory method used, so the claim that they can be synthesized is not guaranteed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the predicted phases are synthesized, lithium doping becomes a practical handle to access W-B superconductivity without megabar pressures.
  • The TCLs strategy could be applied to other ternary systems (e.g., alkali or transition metal additions to Ca-B or Mg-B) to lower stabilization pressures while preserving superconducting properties.
  • The anomalous Tc increase in Li4MoB2 under pressure suggests a new mechanism for pressure-tuned superconductivity tied to anisotropic compression and charge transfer.
  • The similarity of Tc values (~11 K) to WB2 supports the idea that the boron honeycomb framework, not the metal identity alone, controls the superconducting coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The quantitative Tc values depend on the Allen-Dynes formula with a chosen Coulomb pseudopotential (μ*=0.1), so the 11 K numbers carry the usual uncertainty of such estimates; experiments could find somewhat higher or lower Tc.
  • The metastability by ~0.02 eV/atom is within typical DFT error, so the phases might be thermodynamically stable or unstable by a few meV; a careful synthesis attempt (e.g., LiB + WB4 at 0–20 GPa) would test the TCLs prediction directly.
  • The TCLs strategy's efficiency claim (one to two orders of magnitude cheaper than full ternary search) suggests that similar guided searches could accelerate discovery in other ternary systems, though the strategy's validity is only demonstrated for Li-W-B at 0 GPa.
  • If Li2WB6 indeed forms at ambient pressure, it would be a prime candidate for a 'precursor' material to explore related boride superconductors, much like MgB2 at ambient pressure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'ternary composition line' (TCL) strategy to focus crystal-structure searches on selected pseudobinary joints and applies it to Li-W-B and Li-Mo-B up to 60 GPa using MAGUS structure searches and DFT. Nine TCLs yield four Li-W-B compositions (Li2WB6, Li2WB4, LiW3B7, LiWB4) and four Li-Mo-B compositions; LiWB4, Li4MoB2, and LiMo2B2 are reported as thermodynamically stable in pressure windows, while Li2WB6 P6/mmm is 0.019 eV/atom above the ternary convex hull at 0 GPa. Electron-phonon calculations give Tc ≈ 11.2 K for Li2WB6 P6/mmm at 0 GPa and ≈11.4 K for Li2WB4 R-3m at 20 GPa, similar to reported WB2 values near 100 GPa; the authors conclude that Li doping can reduce the stabilization pressure to 0–20 GPa while preserving superconductivity. A full ternary search (FTS) at 0 GPa is used as a benchmark for TCLs. The Li-Mo-B phases show weaker superconductivity, including an anomalous Tc increase in Li4MoB2 under compression.

Significance. If the metastability and pressure-reduction claims withstand scrutiny, this is a useful contribution to the search for lower-pressure boride superconductors and a concrete test of a targeted ternary-search strategy. The paper has real strengths: predicted phases are checked with two independent phonon codes (PHONOPY and QE-DFPT), the TCL results are benchmarked against a full ternary search, and the ELF/PDOS/bond-length analysis gives a physically plausible explanation of why Li substitution preserves WB2-type couplings. The predicted Tc values are consistent with standard first-principles superconductivity calculations, and the anomalous pressure behavior in Li4MoB2 is an interesting observation. The main limitations are that the key ambient-pressure phase is not thermodynamically stable at the GGA-PBE level of accuracy and that the FTS benchmark is performed only at 0 GPa, where no TCL composition is stable; these issues affect the experimental-relevance and method-validation claims more than the EPC/Tc calculations themselves.

major comments (2)
  1. [§III.A, Table 1, Abstract] The central '0 GPa' claim rests on Li2WB6 P6/mmm, which is 0.019 eV/atom above the ternary convex hull at 0 GPa (Table 1). This is within typical GGA-PBE formation-energy errors and is well below the 0.05 eV/atom metastability threshold quoted in §II.A. The phase is therefore not demonstrated to be thermodynamically accessible at ambient pressure; zero-point motion, missing competing phases, or a different exchange-correlation functional could change its hull distance by this magnitude. The abstract's statement that Li introduction can 'reduce the measured stable pressure from ~100 GPa in WB2 P6/mmm to 0 GPa' is stronger than the data support. I recommend consistently describing Li2WB6 P6/mmm as a metastable candidate with potential for synthesis, and, if the 0 GPa leg is to be emphasized, adding zero-point/free-energy corrections and a functional-sensitivity test.
  2. [§III.A, FTS validation paragraph and Fig. S5] The FTS benchmark is performed only at 0 GPa, whereas the TCLs are constructed from the 40 GPa hull and the only thermodynamically stable Li-W-B composition (LiWB4) is predicted above 10 GPa. Thus the FTS does not validate the ability of TCLs to locate stable ternary compositions; it only shows that, at 0 GPa, low-energy metastable compositions cluster near the chosen lines. The sentence 'it did not find other thermodynamically stable ternary compositions' is ambiguous — if no ternary is stable at 0 GPa, this is expected, but it also provides no positive confirmation of the TCL-stable predictions. The efficiency comparison (98 vs over 3000 compositions) is not controlled because the search spaces differ. Please clarify what was actually benchmarked and, ideally, repeat the FTS at a pressure where a stable TCL composition exists.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract, §III.A, Conclusion] The count of predicted phases is inconsistent. The abstract and conclusion say 'five Li-W-B compounds' and 'five unique structures,' while §III.A says 'four unique ternary compositions' and Table 1 lists four compositions (Li2WB6, Li2WB4, LiW3B7, LiWB4; Li2WB6 appears in two space groups). Please reconcile the terminology (e.g., 'four compositions / five phases').
  2. [§III.B, Li-Mo-B results] The sentence 'We conducted structure searches in Li-W compounds but none of the predicted compounds have negative formation energy values' appears in the Li-Mo-B section and should presumably read 'Li-Mo compounds.'
  3. [Tables 2 and 4] The Tc values are quoted only for μ*=0.1, with no sensitivity analysis. Since the comparison to WB2 is a key message, a short statement of the μ* dependence (e.g., 0.08–0.13) or an uncertainty estimate would make the 'around 11 K' claim more robust.
  4. [Figure captions] Figure 2 and Figure 8 captions use 'grep font' for the metastable labels; this should be 'grey font.'
  5. [§III.B, Li4MoB2 anomaly] The anomalous Tc increase is inferred from EPC at only 0, 20, and 40 GPa, while the sharp electronic change at 30 GPa is supported by PDOS/Bader and lattice-parameter data. Please either compute the EPC at 30 GPa or present the 30 GPa result as an electronic trend rather than a confirmed superconducting anomaly.
  6. [§III.A, FTS description] The FTS details are only summarized in the main text; please make clear how many structures per composition were sampled, the convergence criteria, and whether the TCL-predicted phases were included in the FTS energy comparison. This would make the benchmark more reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted pressure reduction and Tc values are obtained from independent first-principles convex-hull, phonon, and EPC calculations, with external benchmarks and an independent full ternary search; self-citations are contextual and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim that Li doping can lower the stabilization pressure of superconducting W-B phases from ~100 GPa to ~0 GPa is not reduced to its inputs. The phases Li2WB6 P6/mmm and Li2WB4 R-3m are obtained from unbiased structure searches, their thermodynamic (meta)stability is assessed from computed convex-hull enthalpies (Table 1), their dynamic stability is checked with two independent phonon codes, and their superconductivity is computed from EPC constants using the Allen-Dynes formula with a fixed, conventional μ*=0.1 (Tables 2 and 4). No parameter is fitted to the target Tc of about 11 K. The TCLs heuristic is tested against an independent full ternary search (FTS) at 0 GPa, which 'reproduce[s] the meta-stable composition of Li2WB6 and LiW3B7 in TCLs' and finds no additional stable ternary compositions; this is a genuine external check rather than a self-definitional validation. The numerical framework is benchmarked against measured Tc values for α-MoB2 (~33 K vs ~32 K) and CaB3 (~17 K vs ~22 K) using the same methodology. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. 31, 34, 45, 72, 81) appear for methods, experimental context, and qualitative mechanistic analogies, but the numerical predictions do not depend on these citations for their validity; the high-pressure WB2 superconducting reference is also supported by external experimental work (Ref. 33). The small 0.019 eV/atom convex-hull distance for Li2WB6 is a robustness concern about synthesizability, not a circularity in the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard DFT approximations and the explicitly stated TCLs heuristic. The only free parameter is μ*; the compounds themselves are predicted, not invented as explanatory entities.

free parameters (1)
  • Coulomb pseudopotential μ* = 0.1
    Used in Allen-Dynes McMillan formula to estimate Tc; chosen conventionally (Tables 2-4), not fitted to target Tc. Varying μ* changes Tc significantly.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper TCLs first assumption: a predicted ternary compound could lie on a specific line of the ternary convex hull connecting stable binaries/elements.
    Section II.A; this is the core heuristic of the proposed strategy; if false, the search may miss important compositions.
  • domain assumption TCLs second assumption: current ternary convex hull constructed from reported binary compounds reflects the potential distribution of stable and metastable ternary compositions.
    Section II.A; relies on completeness of cited binary phase data (Refs. 62-69); if missing binary phases, the hull and TCLs are incorrect.
  • domain assumption GGA-PBE total energies are accurate enough to determine thermodynamic stability within ~0.02 eV/atom.
    Used in convex hull and stability predictions (Table 1); typical DFT error makes the 0.019 eV/atom metastability of Li2WB6 fragile.
  • domain assumption Allen-Dynes-McMillan formula with μ*=0.1 gives reliable Tc estimates for these boron compounds.
    Used for all Tc estimates; standard but approximate, and no sensitivity analysis is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconducting ternary compounds Li-X-B (X=Mo, W) within the mild pressure range: First-principles predictions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VJFOMEOH

@misc{pith2026260802362,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconducting ternary compounds Li-X-B (X=Mo, W) within the mild pressure range: First-principles predictions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VJFOMEOH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02362}
}
read the original abstract

Among the superconducting hydrides under high pressure, a number of studies concentrate on the ternary compounds to explore unique superconductors, which are capable of reducing the stable pressure and maintain superconductivity. In this work, to verify our proposed strategy of ternary composition lines (TCLs) to explore ternary compounds, we combined the first-principles calculations and crystal structure predictions to study the ternary compounds Li-X-B (X=Mo, W) under high pressure. After calculations along five and four TCLs in Li-W-B and Li-Mo-B, respectively, five Li-W-B compounds and four Li-Mo-B compounds were predicted. The compositions of LiWB4, Li4MoB2 and LiMo2B2 could be thermodynamically stable under high pressure, and Li2WB6 is around 0.02 eV/atom above the convex hull at 0 GPa, which has potential for synthesizing. Both of the predicted Li2WB6 P6/mmm and Li2WB4 R-3m are superconducting and their Tc are around 11 K, which are similar to the Tc of WB2 P6/mmm around 100 GPa. An anomalous increase of Tc was found in Li4MoB2 C2/m upon compression. We carried out full ternary search (FTS) to evaluate the validity of the TCLs strategy in Li-W-B system at 0 GPa. Our results are helpful for understanding the phase diagram of Li-X-B (X=Mo, W) under high pressure and the introducing of Li atoms provide candidate structures to reduce the measured stable pressure from ~100 GPa in WB2 P6/mmm to 0 GPa. Meanwhile, we preliminary validate the strategy of TCLs in structure predictions and we expect to improve this strategy in the future, shedding light on the studies of ternary compounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V . Ksenofontov, and S. I. Shylin, Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system, Nature (London) 525, 73 (2015)

    2015

  2. [2]

    Einaga, M

    M. Einaga, M. Sakata, T. Ishikawa, K. Shimizu, M. I. Eremets, A. P. Drozdov, I. A. Troyan, N. Hirao, and Y . Ohishi, Crystal structure of the superconducting phase of sulfur hydride, Nat. Phys. 12, 835 (2016)

    2016

  3. [3]

    D. Duan, Y . Liu, F. Tian, D. Li, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, W. Tian, and T. Cui, Pressure-induced metallization of dense (H 2S)2H2 with high-Tc superconductivity, Sci. Rep. 4, 6968 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    D. Duan, X. Huang, F. Tian, D. Li, H. Yu, Y . Liu, Y . Ma, B. Liu, and T. Cui, Pressure- induced decomposition of solid hydrogen sulfide, Phys. Rev. B 91, 180502(R) (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    F. Peng, Y . Sun, C. J. Pickard, R. J. Needs, Q. Wu, and Y . M. Ma, Hydrogen Clathrate Structures in Rare Earth Hydrides at High Pressures: Possible Route to Room - Temperature Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 107001 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V . S. Minkov, S. P. Besedin, M. A.Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, D. E. Graf, V . B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, D. A. Knyazev, M. Tkacz, M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures, Nature 569, 528 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Snide, N

    E. Snide, N. Dasenbrock-Gammon, R. McBride, N. Meyers, K. Lawler, A. Salamat, R. P. Dias, Superconductivity to 262 kelvin via catalyzed hydrogenation of yttrium at high pressures. arXiv:2012.13627 (2020)

    arXiv 2012

  8. [8]

    H. Wang, J. S. Tse, K. Tanaka, T. Iitaka, and Y . Ma, Superconductive sodalite-like clathrate calcium hydride at high pressures, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6463 (2012)

    2012

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    L. Ma, K. Wang, Y . Xie, X. Yang, Y . Wang, M. Zhou, H. Liu, X. Yu, Y . Zhao, H. Wang, G. Liu, Y . Ma, High-Temperature Superconducting Phase in Clathrate Calcium Hydride CaH6 up to 215 K at a Pressure of 172 GPa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022, 128, 167001

    2022

  2. [10]

    Z. Li, X. He, C. Zhang, X. Wang, S. Zhang, Y . Jia, S. Feng, K. Lu, J. Zhao, J. Zhang, B. Min, Y . Long, R. Yu, L. Wang, M. Ye, Z. Zhang, V . Prakapenka, S. Chariton, P. A. Ginsberg, J. Bass, S. Yuan, H. Liu, C. Jin, Superconductivity above 200 K discovered in superhydrides of...

    2022

  3. [11]

    H. Y . Liu, Naumov II, R. Hoffmann, N. W. Ashcroft, and R. J. Hemley, Potential high-T c superconducting lanthanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6990 (2017)

    2017

  4. [12]

    Z. M. Geball, H. Liu, A. K. Mishra, M. Ahart, M. Somayazulu, Y . Meng, M. Baldini, R. J. Hemley, Synthesis and Stability of Lanthanum Superhydrides, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 688 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    I. A. Troyan, D. V . Semenok, A. G. Kvashnin, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, V . M. Pudalov, A. G. Ivanova, V . B. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, A. G. Gavriliuk, I. S. Lyubutin, V . V . Struzhkin, A. Bergara, I. Errea, R. Bianco, M. Calandra, F. Mauri, L. Monacelli, R. Akashi,...

    2021

  6. [14]

    P. Kong, V . S. Minkov, M. A. Kuzovnikov, A. P. Drozdov, S. P. Besedin, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. F. Balakirev, V . B. Prakapenka, S. Chariton, D. A. Knyazev, E. Greenberg and M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity up to 243 K in the yttrium -hydrogen system under high pressure, ...

    2021

  7. [15]

    Y . Wang, K. Wang, Y . Sun, L. Ma, Y . Wang, B. Zou, G. Liu, M. Zhou, H. Wang, Synthesis and superconductivity in yttrium superhydrides under high pressure, Chin. Phys. B 31, 106201 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    D. V . Semenok, I. A. Troyan, A. G. Ivanova , A. G. Kvashnin, I. A. Kruglov, M. Hanfland, A. V . Sadakov, O. A. Sobolevskiy, K. S. Pervakov , I. S. Lyubutin, K . V. Glazyrin, N. Giordano, D. N. Karimov, A. L. Vasiliev, R. Akashi, V . M. Pudalov, A. R. Oganov, Superconductivity...

    2021

  9. [17]

    W. Chen, X. Huang, D. V . Semenok, S. Chen, D. Zhou, K. Zhang, A. R. Oganov, T. Cui, Enhancement of superconducting properties in the La-Ce-H system at moderate pressures. Nat. Commun. 14, 2660 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    J. K. Bi, Y . Nakamoto, P. Y . Zhang, K. Shimizu, B. Zou, H . Y. L i u, M. Zhou, G. T. Liu, H. B. Wang, Y . M. Ma, Giant enhancement of superconducting critical temperature in substitutional alloy (La,Ce)H

  11. [19]

    Nat. Commun. 13, 5952 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Zhang, T

    Z. Zhang, T. Cui, M. J. Hutcheon, A. M. Shipley, H. Song, M. Du, V. Z . K r e s i n, D. Duan, C. J. Pickard, Y . Yao, Design principles for high-temperature superconductors with a hydrogen -based alloy backbone at moderate pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 047001 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Y . Song, J. Bi, Y . Nakamoto, K. Shimizu, H. Liu, B. Zou, G. Liu, H. Wang, Y . Ma, Stoichiometric Ternary Superhydride LaBeH 8 as a New Template for High - Temperature Superconductivity at 110 K under 80 GPa. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 266001 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    W. Zhao, D. Duan, M. Du, X. Yao, Z. Huo, Q. Jiang, and T. Cui, Pressure-induced high-Tc superconductivity in the ternary clathrate system Y-Ca-H, Phys. Rev. B 106, 014521 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Zhang, J

    K. Zhang, J. Guo, Y . Wang, X. Wu, X. Huang and T. Cui, Robust superconducting stability of ternary hydride Im -3m (Y , Ca)H 6 upon decompression, Chin. Phys. Lett. 42(11): 110704, (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    M. Du, H. Huang, Z. Zhang, M. Wang, H. Song, D. Duan, T. Cui, High- Temperature Superconductivity in Perovskite Hydride Below 10 GPa. Adv. Sci. 11 42 2408370 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Gao, X.- W

    M. Gao, X.- W. Yan, Z.-Y . Lu, and T. Xiang, Phonon-mediated high-temperature superconductivity in the ternary borohydride KB2H8 under pressure near 12 GPa, Phys. Rev. B 104, L100504 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Jiang, Z

    Q. Jiang, Z. Zhang, H. Song, Y . Ma, Y . Sun, M. Miao, T. Cui and D. Duan, Ternary superconducting hydrides stabilized via Th and Ce elements at mild pressures. Fundam. Res. 2 3 550 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    X. Wang, C. Ding, Q. Lu, T. Huang, Y . Li, J. Wang, Y . Han, D. Xing, and J. Sun, Prediction of ambient superconductivity in ternary thorium-silicon superhydrides with a breathing kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024513 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Di Cataldo, C

    S. Di Cataldo, C. Heil, W. von der Linden, and L. Boeri, LaBH8: Towards high-Tc low-pressure superconductivity in ternary superhydrides, Phys. Rev. B 104, L020511 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    S. Li, H. Wang, W. Sun, C. Lu, and F. Peng, Superconductivity in compressed ternary alkaline boron hydrides, Phys. Rev. B 105, 224107 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    K. Gao, W. Cui, J. Shi, A. P. Durajski, J. Hao, S. Botti, M. A. L. Marques, and Y . Li, Prediction of high- Tc superconductivity in ternary actinium beryl lium hydrides at low pressure, Phys. Rev. B 109, 014501 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Lilia, R

    B. Lilia, R. Hennig, P. Hirschfeld, G. Profeta, A. Sanna, E. Zurek, W. E. Pickett, M. Amsler, R. Dias, M. I. Eremets, C. Heil, R. J. Hemley, H. Liu, Y . Ma, C. Pierleoni, A. N. Kolmogorov, N. Rybin, D. Novoselov, V . Anisimov, A. R. Oganov, C. J. Pickard, T. Bi, R. Arita, I. E...

    2021

  24. [32]

    C. Y . Pei, J. F. Zhang, Q. Wang, Y . Zhao, L. L. Gao, C. S. Gong, S. J. Tian, R. T. Luo, M. T. Li, W. G. Yang, Z. Y . Lu, H. C. Lei, K. Liu, and Y . P. Qi, Pressure-induced superconductivity at 32 K in MoB 2, Nat. Sci. Rev. 10, nwad034 (2023)

    2023

  25. [33]

    X. H. Liu, X. W. Huang, P. Song, C. Z. Wang, L. Y . Zhang, P. Lv, L. L. Liu, W. F. Zhang, J. H. Cho, and Y . Jia, Str ong electron-phonon coupling superconductivity in compressed α-MoB2 induced by double Van Hove singularities , Phys. Rev. B 106, 064507 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    J. Lim, A. C. Hire, Y . Quan, J. S. Kim, S. R. Xie, S. Sinha, R. S. Kumar, D. Popov, C. Park, R. J. Hemley, Y. K. V ohra, J. J. Hamlin, R. G. Hennig, P. J. Hirschfeld and G. R. Stewart, Creating superconductivity in WB 2 through pressure-induced metastable planar defects, Nat....

    2022

  27. [35]

    C. Y . Pei, J. F. Zhang, C. S. Gong, Q. Wang, L. L. Gao, Y . Zhao, S. J. Tian, W. Z. Cao, C. H. Li, Z. Y . Lu, H. C. Lei, K. Liu and Y . P. Qi, Distinct superconducting behaviors of pressurized WB2 and ReB2 with different local B layers, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 2874...

    2022

  28. [36]

    Nagamatsu, N

    J. Nagamatsu, N. Nakagawa, T. Muranaka, Y . Zenitani, J. Akimitsu, Superconductivity at 39 K in magnesium diboride. Nature 410 63-4 (2001)

    2001

  29. [37]

    H. J. Choi, S. G. Louie, and M. L. Cohen, Prediction of superconducting properties of CaB2 using anisotropic Eliashberg theory, Phys. Rev. B 80, 064503 (2009)

    2009

  30. [38]

    S. Han, L. Yu, Y . Liu, B. Zhao, C. Wang, X. Chen, Y . Zhang, R. Yu, and X. Liu, Clathrate-Like Alkali and Alkaline -Earth Metal Borides: A New Family of Superconductors with Superior Hardness, Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2213377 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Y . Ma, J. Dong, H. Chen, H. Jiang, X. Jiang, J. Wang, D. Duan, and J. Sun, Ambient-pressure hardness and superconductivity in sp 2 and sp3 bonded Ce -B compounds, Phys. Rev. B 110, 134515 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    J. Wang, X. Song, X. Shao, B. Gao, Q. Li, and Y . Ma, High-Pressure Evolution of Unexpected Chemical Bonding and Promising Superconducting Properties of YB 6, J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 27820 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Zhang, X

    S. Zhang, X. Du, J. Lin, A. Bergara, X. Chen, X. Liu, X. Zhang and G. Yang, Superconducting boron allotropes, Phys. Rev. B 101, 174507 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    Liang, M

    Y . Liang, M. Xu, S. Lin, X. Yuan, Z. Qu, J. Hao, and Y . Li, Pressure-induced boron clathrates with ambient-pressure superconductivity, J. Mater. Chem. C 9, 13782 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Q. Wang, H. Li, J. Wei, T. Zhong, L. Zhu, X. Zhang, H. Liu, and S. Zhang, Hardness and superconductivity in tetragonal LiB 4 and NaB 4, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 234707 (2023)

    2023

  36. [44]

    J. M. Gonzalez, K. N. Cong, B. A. Steele, and I. I. Oleynik, Novel phases and superconductivity of tin sulfide compounds, J. Chem. Phys. 148, 194701 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Y . Sun, B. Cao, X. Wang, J. Chen, D. Duan, F. Tian and T. Cui, Structural stabilities, electronic structures, and superconductivity properties of Ge xS1-x compounds under high pressure, J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 19227 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    J. Wu, B. Zhu, C. Ding, D. Shao, C. Pei, Q. Wang, J. Sun and Y . Qi, Enhancement of superconducting transition temperature and exotic stoichiometries in Lu- S system under high pressure, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023177 (2024)

    2024

  39. [47]

    S. Shao, W. Zhu, J. Lv, Y . Wang, Y . Chen and Y . Ma, The exotically stoichiometric compounds in Al–S system under high pressure, npj Comput. Mater. 6, 11 (2020)

    2020

  40. [48]

    J. Chen, W. Cui, K. Gao, J. Hao, J. Shi, and Y . Li, Pressure-stabilized unconventional stoichiometric yttrium sulfides, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043435 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    K. Gao, W. Cui, Q. Wang, J. Hao, J. Shi, S. Botti, M. A. L. Marques and Y . Li, Superconductivity in S-rich phases of lanthanum sulfide under high pressure, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 064801 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    Zhong, H

    W. Zhong, H. Zhang, F. Hong and B. Yue, Superconductivity in metal sulfides, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 37 173002 (2025)

    2025

  43. [51]

    A. G. Kvashnin, C. Tantardini, H. A. Zakaryan, Y . A. Kvashnina, and A. R. Oganov, Computational Search for New W -Mo-B Compounds, Chem. Mater. 32, 7028−7035 (2020)

    2020

  44. [52]

    X. Yuan, Y . Zhang, J. Hao, M. Xu and Y . Li, Pressure-induced ternary Li -Mn-B compounds: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043114 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    X.-L. He, W. Zhao, Y . Xie, A. Hermann, R. J. Hemley, H. Liu and Y . Ma, Predicted hot superconductivity in LaSc2H24 under pressure, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121 (26) e2401840121 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    Jiang, X

    B. Jiang, X. Luo, Y . Sun, X. Zhong, J. Lv, Y . Xie, Y . Ma and H. Liu, Data-driven search for high-temperature superconductors in ternary hydrides under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054505 (2025)

    2025

  47. [55]

    Choudhary and K

    K. Choudhary and K. Garrity, Designing high- Tc superconductors with BCS - inspired screening, density functional theory, and deep-learning, npj Comput. Mater. 8, 244 (2022)

    2022

  48. [56]

    S. Saha, S. Di Cataldo, F. Giannessi, A. Cucciari, W. von der Linden, and L. Boeri, Mapping superconductivity in highpressure hydrides: The Superhydra project, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 054806 (2023)

    2023

  49. [57]

    T. F. T. Cerqueira, A. Sanna, and M. A. L. Marques, Sampling the materials space for conventional superconducting compounds, Adv. Mater. 36, 2307085 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    X. Liu, H. Niu and A. R. Oganov, COPEX: co- evolutionary crystal structure prediction algorithm for complex systems, npj Comput. Mater. 7:199 (2021)

    2021

  51. [59]

    G. M. Shutov, D . V . Semenok, I. A. Kruglov, A. R. Oganov, Ternary superconducting hydrides in the La -Mg-H system, Mater. Today Phys. 40, 101300 (2024)

    2024

  52. [60]

    H. Xiao, Y . Dan, B. Suo, and X. Chen, Comment on “ Accelerated discovery of new 8-electron half-Heusler compounds as promising energy and topological quantum materials, J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 2247 (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    Z. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Yu, H. Xu, A. Bergara, and G. Yang, Predicted Pressure - Induced Superconducting Transition in Electride Li 6P, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 097002 (2019)

    2019

  54. [62]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Zhao, A. Bergara and G. Yang, Superconducting Li 10Se electride under pressure, J. Chem. Phys. 156, 194112 (2022)

    2022

  55. [63]

    A. G. Kvashnin, H. A. Zakaryan, C. Zhao, Y. Duan, Y. A. Kvashnina, C. Xie, H. Dong and A . R. Oganov , New Tungsten Borides, Their Stability and Outstanding Mechanical Properties, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 3470−3477 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    C. Zhao, Y . Duan, J. Gao, W. Liu, H. Dong, H. Dong, D. Zhang and A. R. Oganov, Unexpected Stable Phases of Tungsten Borides, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. DOI: 10.1039/C8CP04222E (2018)

    2018 doi

  57. [65]

    F. Peng, M. Miao, H. Wang, Q. Li and Yanming Ma, Predicted Lithium −Boron Compounds under High Pressure, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18599−18605 (2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    Hermann, A

    A. Hermann, A. McSorley, N. W. Ashcroft and R. Hoffmann, From Wade−Mingos to Zintl−Klemm at 100 GPa: Binary Compounds of Boron and Lithium, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 18606−18618 (2012)

    2012

  59. [67]

    D. Wang, H. Zhou, C. Hu, Y . Zhong, A. R. Oganov and G. Rao, Prediction of thermodynamically stable Li -B compounds at ambient pressure, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. DOI: 10.1039/C6CP08900C (2017)

    2017 doi

  60. [68]

    J. Lv, Y . Wang, L. Zhu, Y . Ma, Predicted Novel High-Pressure Phases of Lithium, Phys. Rev. Lett 106, 015503 (2011)

    2011

  61. [69]

    Oganov, J

    A. Oganov, J. Chen, C. Gatti, Y . Ma, Y . Ma, C. Glass, Z. Liu, T. Yu, O. Kurakevych, and V . Solozhenko, Ionic high-pressure form of elemental boron, Nature (London) 457, 863 (2009)

    2009

  62. [70]

    K. P. Hilleke, T. Ogitsu, S. Zhang, and E. Zurek, Structural motifs and bonding in two families of boron structures predicted at megabar pressures, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 053605 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    The Supplementary Material contains Refs

    See Supplementary Material at [URL] for the detailed parameters used in MAGUS and first-principles calculations; the calculated lattice parameters of the predicted Li - X-B (X=Mo, W) structures; the 1 st generation of TCLs in Li-Mo-B; the phonon spectra of the predicted Li-X-B...

  64. [72]

    K. Xia, H. Gao, C. Liu, J. Yuan, J. Sun, H. T. Wang, and D. Xing, A novel superhard tungsten nitride predicted by machinelearning accelerated crystal structure search, Sci. Bull. 63, 817 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    J. Wang, H. Gao, Y . Han, C. Ding, S. Pan, Y . Wang, Q. Jia, H.-T. Wang, D. Xing, and J. Sun, MAGUS: machine learning and graph theory assisted universal struc ture searcher, Natl. Sci. Rev. 10, nwad128, (2023)

    2023

  66. [74]

    H. J. Monkhorst, and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillouin -zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  67. [75]

    Kresse, and J

    G. Kresse, and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  68. [76]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  69. [77]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  70. [78]

    A. Togo, I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calculations in materials science, Scr. Mater. 108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  71. [79]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Coc occioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin- Samos, N. Marzari, F. M...

    2009

  72. [80]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  73. [81]

    P. B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong -coupled superconductors reanalyzed, Phys. Rev. B 12, 905 (1975)

    1975

  74. [82]

    J. Wang, M. Wang, X. Liu, M. Jiang and L. Liu, Covalent bond inducing strong electron-phonon coupling superconductivity in MgB 2-type transition metal diboride WB2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 074804 (2023)

    2023

  75. [83]

    Wang, G.B

    B. Wang, G.B. Zhang, Y .X. Wang, Predicted crystal structures of molybdenum under high pressure, J. Alloys. Compd, 2013, 556, 116-120

    2013

  76. [84]

    C. Zhou, H. Yu, Z. Zhang, Z. Yu, J. Zhu, K. Bao, T. Cui, First-principles study of the superconductivity of MoB2 under low pressure and its evolution under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B, 2024, 109, 064502

    2024

  77. [85]

    Zhang, J

    K. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Li, Y . Zhang, Y . Chen, X. Huang and T. Cui, Record Superconductivity in a Kagome Calcium Boride at High Pressure, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 40420−40428 (2025)

    2025

  78. [86]

    Zhang, S

    Z. Zhang, S. Chen, F. Zheng, V . Antropov, Y . Sun and K.- M. Ho, Accelerated Exploration of Empty Material Compositional Space: Mg−Fe−B Ternary Metal Borides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 33179−33192 ( 2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 4, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.