Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Pressure induced magnetic-field-free superconducting diode effect in NbSe2 flake

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pressure alone induces a magnetic-field-free superconducting diode effect in NbSe2 flakes, challenging the requirement that both inversion and time-reversal symmetry must be broken.

desk verdict A real pressure-induced zero-field diode effect in NbSe2, but the TRS-breaking claim rests on an inference the authors themselves undercut. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03072 v1 pith:UIFFTVB3 submitted 2026-08-04 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Shihao Zhu , Tian Le , Cuiying Pei , Changhua Li , Yi Liao , Yi Zhao , Lingxiao Zhao , Qi Wang
show 12 more authors
Juefei Wu Qilian Zhang Yueshen Wu Tonghuan Fu Xujie Lü Wenge Yang Jie Shen Jun Li Yulin Chen Xiao Lin Wen-Yu He Yanpeng Qi
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords superconductingdiodeeffectpressure-inducedsuperconductivityNbSe2time-reversalsymmetrybreakinginversionsecond-harmonicgenerationLandau-Ginzburgtheorynonreciprocalsupercurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that applying pressure alone to flakes of the centrosymmetric superconductor NbSe2 produces a magnetic-field-free superconducting diode effect: the critical current for positive and negative current directions becomes different at zero applied field. It argues that pressure breaks inversion symmetry without heterostructures, as confirmed by second-harmonic generation, and that the even-in-out-of-plane-field dependence of the diode asymmetry indicates that time-reversal symmetry is not explicitly broken. If correct, this would overturn the standard requirement that superconducting diodes need both inversion and time-reversal symmetry breaking, and would make pressure a generic tuning knob for nonreciprocal superconductivity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the phenomenological Landau-Ginzburg free energy density $f(\Delta_{\mathbf{q}})$ with a $q^3$ term coupled to inversion-symmetry breaking, while the linear-$q$ term is excluded to keep the equilibrium pairing momentum at $q=0$. Inversion breaking is supplied by pressure-induced electric polarization along the armchair direction, and the odd-in-$q$ cubic term makes $f$ asymmetric about $q=0$, so opposite supercurrent directions have different critical currents. The paper also relies on the even-in-out-of-plane-field behavior of the diode asymmetry as the experimental signature that explicit time-reversal symmetry is not broken.

What would settle it

Measure the diode asymmetry under an in-plane magnetic field at fixed pressure: observation of hysteretic magnetoresistance, or of an odd-in-field component of the asymmetric critical current that grows with in-plane field, would directly reveal spontaneous time-reversal-symmetry breaking. Conversely, reproducing the zero-field diode effect in a truly hydrostatic pressure cell without stress gradients would confirm the global inversion-breaking mechanism, while its absence would indicate an inhomogeneous-strain origin.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a single-phase, centrosymmetric 2H-NbSe2 flake inside a diamond anvil cell develops a zero-field diode efficiency up to about 4.9 percent once pressure exceeds a few GPa. Pressure-induced lattice distortion, modelled as interlayer sliding or in-plane bonding stretching, reduces the point-group symmetry to C1v and creates a global in-plane electric polarization along the armchair direction, which the authors confirm through pressure-dependent second-harmonic generation. The diode polarity is locked to this polarization direction, persists after flipping the device 180 degrees in the cryostat, reverses when the electrical leads are swapped, and disappears after thermal cycling to a stabilized pressure, reappearing when pressure is manually increased. The proposed mechanism is a Landau-Ginzburg free energy containing a cubic term in the Cooper-pair momentum, so that even at zero equilibrium momentum the energy cost for supercurrents in opposite directions is unequal, producing distinct critical currents without a finite-momentum pairing state.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the even-in-out-of-plane-field dependence of the diode asymmetry rules out explicit time-reversal-symmetry breaking; if that evenness instead comes from field-dependent orbital or vortex effects, the claim that a magnetic-field-free superconducting diode can arise without explicit time-reversal-symmetry breaking loses its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If pressure alone can induce the superconducting diode effect in NbSe2, then centrosymmetric superconductors generally become candidates for nonreciprocal transport once inversion symmetry is broken by strain.
  • Pressure becomes a continuous, in-situ tuning knob for superconducting diode polarity and efficiency, without heterostructure growth or applied magnetic fields.
  • The even-in-field dependence means the diode effect can persist at zero field and be controlled by small out-of-plane fields, which is relevant for field-free superconducting electronics.
  • The proposed $q^3$ Landau-Ginzburg mechanism, if general, should apply to any quasi-two-dimensional superconductor with an in-plane polar axis, not only NbSe2.
  • The vanishing of the effect at a stabilized pressure and its reappearance under further pressurization indicates that the diode is tied to the strain state rather than simply to the superconducting transition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the even-in-out-of-plane-field symmetry is later shown to arise from orbital depairing or vortex dynamics rather than from implicit time-reversal-symmetry breaking, the paper's central conclusion would need to be narrowed to 'without explicit time-reversal-symmetry breaking under out-of-plane fields.'
  • A direct test is in-plane-field transport: hysteretic magnetoresistance or an odd-in-in-plane-field diode asymmetry would reveal an in-plane magnetic order, which would mean time-reversal symmetry is spontaneously broken.
  • The proposed mechanism could be tested in other centrosymmetric transition-metal dichalcogenides under uniaxial or biaxial strain, where the strain direction sets the polarization and should lock the diode polarity.
  • The appearance and disappearance of the diode across pressure cycles suggests stress inhomogeneity inside the diamond anvil cell may be essential; if so, hydrostatic-pressure experiments in a different pressure cell would either reproduce the effect or show it is an inhomogeneous-strain artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a magnetic-field-free superconducting diode effect (SDE) in pressurized NbSe2 flakes: critical currents for opposite current directions differ at zero applied field, with control experiments (contact-lead swapping, DAC rotation, multiple devices) supporting an intrinsic origin. The authors argue that pressure breaks inversion symmetry, as inferred from second-harmonic generation (SHG), and that the even-in-out-of-plane-field dependence of the diode asymmetry implies the absence of explicit time-reversal-symmetry (TRS) breaking. They supplement the experimental report with a Landau-Ginzburg free-energy model containing a cubic Cooper-pair-momentum term, which they propose as the mechanism for the zero-field SDE.

Significance. If the central claim were fully established, this would be an interesting contribution: pressure-induced zero-field nonreciprocal superconductivity in a single-phase centrosymmetric TMD, with no heterostructure, would broaden the materials platform for field-free superconducting diodes. The experimental strengths are real: the measured zero-field asymmetry, lead-swapping and DAC-flipping controls, and the multi-device repetition are valuable. However, the headline claim that the effect occurs 'without explicitly breaking TRS' is not supported by the presented evidence. The even-in-B symmetry of the diode parameters does not discriminate between external-field TRS breaking and spontaneous or implicit TRS breaking inside the sample, and the authors themselves invoke implicit TRS breaking via in-plane magnetic order as one possible route. The SHG and transport data are also not clearly obtained on the same device, and the phenomenological q^3 model is not independently tested, so the theoretical framework remains illustrative rather than evidential. With substantial revision and a more carefully scoped claim, the paper could make a solid contribution.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; §III, Discussion] The central claim that a magnetic-field-free SDE can emerge 'without explicitly breaking TRS' is not supported by the data. The only experimental evidence cited for this is the even-in-B behavior of ΔIc and η in Fig. 3D, but that symmetry is exactly what one expects for an in-plane magnetic order that couples quadratically to an out-of-plane field, a possibility the authors themselves raise when discussing 'implicit TRS breaking'. Since no zero-field probe of TRS (e.g., Kerr rotation, muon spin rotation, neutron scattering, or in-plane magnetoresistance hysteresis) is reported, the observation is fully consistent with the standard paradigm in which TRS is broken by a spontaneous or proximitized magnetic order rather than by an external field. The abstract and conclusions should be reframed to state that the effect is field-free and that the microscopic TRS status remains to be established, or direct TRS-breaking evidence must be added.
  2. [§II, Figs. 2–4] The SHG and transport measurements are not demonstrated to be performed on the same sample. The SHG data in Fig. 4A are described as being obtained on a 10 nm NbSe2 flake, while the transport data in Figs. 2 and 3 are from Device 1, whose thickness is only estimated by optical contrast; no statement is made that the SHG flake and the transport device are one and the same, or at least fabricated under identical conditions in the same DAC. Since the argument that pressure breaks inversion symmetry in the transporting device relies directly on the SHG result, the paper must either present SHG and transport on the same device or explicitly report the sample-to-sample consistency of the SHG onset and the SDE onset.
  3. [§III, Landau-Ginzburg model] The proposed q^3 Landau-Ginzburg model is not independently tested. The q^3 coupling coefficient is introduced ad hoc, its microscopic origin is stated to be unknown, and no quantitative comparison with the measured Ic±(T,B), ΔIc, or η is provided. The manuscript's symmetry argument that the q^3 coefficient must reverse sign under time reversal is itself a statement that TRS is broken in the superconducting state through some mechanism; therefore the model cannot be used to support the claim that the SDE occurs without TRS breaking. The model should be presented as a qualitative consistency check, not as evidence for the central claim, or it should be made falsifiable by deriving a specific prediction for pressure, temperature, or field dependence and testing it against the data.
  4. [§II, Fig. 3D and paragraph following it] There is an internal inconsistency in the magnetic-field results. The text states that the 'forward diode polarity remains robust across all fields', but later in the same paragraph it states that ΔIc 'reverses sign at both ±1000 Oe' (Fig. 3D). If ΔIc reverses sign at ±1000 Oe, the polarity is not robust across all fields. This needs to be clarified: either the data show a polarity reversal beyond ±1000 Oe, which would significantly affect the even-in-B interpretation, or the wording is inaccurate and should be corrected with a clear description of the field ranges in which the diode polarity is maintained.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§II, Fig. 1D and Fig. 3A] The definition of Ic is inconsistent: in Fig. 1D the critical current is identified from the V-I curve, while in Fig. 3A it is defined as the peak of dV/dI. The manuscript should state clearly which criterion is used for each data set, since the two definitions can yield different numeric values for ΔIc and η.
  2. [Fig. 3D] No error bars or uncertainty estimates are shown for ΔIc and η. Given that the central symmetry claim rests on the field dependence of these quantities, at least a representative uncertainty or repeated-measurement data should be provided.
  3. [Data availability] The data availability statement says there are no publicly available data or software supporting the manuscript. For an experimental report of this type, deposition of raw transport and SHG data in a public repository would substantially improve reproducibility and is strongly recommended.
  4. [§II, pressure dependence] The sentence describing the disappearance of the SDE at 9.5 GPa after thermal cycling is followed by speculation that this could stem from uneven pressure distribution, but the two explanations are not distinguishable in the present data. A brief quantitative statement of the pressure uncertainty and the number of independent runs used for this conclusion would help.
  5. [Introduction and §II] There are minor typographical and grammatical issues throughout, such as 'break s' in the abstract and awkward phrasings in the SHG and pressure sections. The manuscript would benefit from a careful language edit.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

The central experiment is not circular, but the proposed q^3 Landau-Ginzburg mechanism explains the diode by restating it as an input term; the even-in-B-to-no-TRS-breaking inference is an inference gap rather than a circular step.

  1. self definitional [Section III (Discussions), paragraph beginning "Building on this insight, we propose..."]
    "Building on this insight, we propose a minimal Landau-Ginzburg free energy density 𝑓𝑓(Δ𝒒) that incorporates a q3 term coupled to IS breaking. ... At q=0, the q3 term induced asymmetry of 𝑓𝑓(Δ𝒒) imposes different energy costs for Cooper pairs moving in opposite directions, directly yielding distinct critical supercurrents I c+ and Ic-."

    The q^3 term is added to the free energy specifically to make f(q) asymmetric about q=0; unequal critical currents follow from that term by construction. The paper does not derive the q^3 coefficient from pressure, from the SHG-observed IS breaking, or from any independent measurement, and it explicitly states that the microscopic origin of the q^3 term 'requires further investigation.' The proposed 'mechanism' therefore restates the observed SDE as an assumed term in the free energy rather than deriving it from first principles. The experimental observation itself is independent of this model, so the circularity is partial and model-level, not a fabrication of the central data.

full rationale

The paper's main experimental finding—pressure-induced zero-field SDE in NbSe2 flakes, with SHG evidence for IS breaking and even-in-B suppression of ΔIc—is self-contained and not derived from the model. No load-bearing self-citation chain is present: Ref. [58] (Wickramaratne et al.) is an external source for the near-ferromagnetic instability, and author-overlapping citations such as Refs. [12] and [35] serve as background literature rather than as the basis for the central claim. The even-in-B symmetry argument concerns whether 'explicit TRS breaking' is absent; the paper itself concedes that an implicit in-plane magnetic order or a nonequilibrium coupling would break TRS, so the strength of the 'without explicitly breaking TRS' claim is a correctness or inference issue, not a circularity. The only genuine circular step is the phenomenological q^3 Landau-Ginzburg model: it postulates the q^3 term to obtain the observed asymmetric critical currents and then presents that asymmetry as the model's explanation. Because the model is auxiliary, explicitly phenomenological, and not used to generate the experimental data, the overall circularity is modest rather than structural.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the interpretation of SHG as global inversion symmetry breaking and the even-in-B data as evidence for no explicit TRS breaking. The Landau-Ginzburg model adds a q^3 term as a free phenomenological parameter without independent microscopic derivation, and the SHG fitting introduces additional unstated parameters. No genuinely new physical entities are introduced; the paper speculates about possible in-plane magnetic order but does not postulate it as a concrete entity.

free parameters (2)
  • q^3 coupling coefficient in Landau-Ginzburg free energy
    The model introduces a cubic momentum term with an unspecified coefficient that produces the diode asymmetry; its magnitude is not derived from a microscopic theory nor fitted to any measured observable in the paper.
  • SHG fitting parameters (C1v susceptibility amplitudes)
    The simulation of the SHG pattern for a 10 nm flake at 15.9 GPa reportedly fits the experimental pattern using a C1v point-group model; the specific nonlinear susceptibility tensor components are not reported in the main text and are deferred to the supplementary material.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Pressure-induced SHG signal in the NbSe2 flake indicates a global, uniform breaking of inversion symmetry across the sample.
    The SHG is measured on a different sample than the transport device, and local strain, surface effects, or inhomogeneous pressure inside the DAC could produce SHG without a global symmetry change. The paper itself notes the SHG is non-local but does not directly correlate it with the SDE device.
  • domain assumption Even-in-B dependence of the diode asymmetry implies no explicit time-reversal symmetry breaking.
    This inference is stated in the abstract and discussion, but the paper also considers an in-plane magnetic order that would break TRS implicitly, and the even-in-B symmetry could in principle arise from other field-dependent mechanisms such as orbital depairing.
  • ad hoc to paper The Cooper pair condensate is at zero momentum in equilibrium, so the diode effect arises from a q^3 term rather than finite-momentum pairing.
    The model is constructed to explain the observed SDE by explicitly excluding the linear q term and positing a cubic term. The choice to minimize f at q=0 is a modeling assumption not independently verified by microscopic theory or by measurements of a finite momentum pairing.
  • domain assumption The flake remains single-phase 2H-NbSe2 under pressure with no structural phase transition affecting transport.
    The authors state that characterization by synchrotron XRD at high pressure was not performed, so the crystal structure under pressure is inferred from SHG and prior literature rather than directly confirmed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pressure induced magnetic-field-free superconducting diode effect in NbSe2 flake." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UIFFTVB3

@misc{pith2026260803072,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pressure induced magnetic-field-free superconducting diode effect in NbSe2 flake},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UIFFTVB3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03072}
}
read the original abstract

The superconducting diode effect (SDE) is a fascinating nonreciprocal phenomenon where the critical current is different for opposite current directions. It is widely believed that realizing SDE requires breaking both inversion symmetry (IS) and time-reversal symmetry (TRS), which are usually achieved via heterostructure engineering and applying external magnetic fields. Here, we report a pressure-induced magnetic-field-free SDE in NbSe2 flakes without any heterostructures. We show that pressure alone breaks the IS, as confirmed by the second harmonic generation. Crucially, upon applying an out-of-plane magnetic field (B), the SDE exhibits even-in-B behavior, implying the absence of explicit TRS breaking. This finding challenges the prevailing theoretical paradigm and demonstrates that a magnetic-field-free SDE can emerge without explicitly breaking TRS. Thereby, our work establishes pressure engineering as a powerful tool for inducing nonreciprocal superconductivity and designing versatile, magnetic-field-free superconducting devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03072 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. C shows an optical image of a typical high￾pressure NbSe2 flake Device 1. To determine sample thickness within the DAC, atomic force microscopy was first used to measure samples of varying thickness on SiO2/Si substrate, and then the thickness of DAC￾encapsulated samples was estimated via the optical contrast under a microscope. The thickness of Device 1 is approximately 10 nm. The electrical transport properties of… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. C. Rose -Innes and E. H. Rhoderick, Introduction to superconductivity (Second Edition) Pergamon, (1978)

    work page 1978

  2. [2]

    A. I. Braginski, Superconductor electronics: status and outlook, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 32, 23 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Pioneer” and “Leading Goose

    Cooper pair momentum dependent coupling in the Landau Ginzburg free energy functional. This discovery of a pressure-induced magnetic field -free SDE in NbSe 2 flakes redefines the symmetry requirements for the SDE, enriches the known superconducting physics in NbSe2 [38-43], and advances our understanding of superconductivity under symmetry breaking. Furt...

    work page

  4. [4]

    R. Cai, I. Žutić, and W. Han, Superconductor/ferromagnet heterostructures: A platform for superconducting spintronics and quantum computation, Adv. Quantum Technol. 6, 2200080 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J . W. A. Robinson, Superconducting spintronics, Nat. Phys. 11, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Liu and M

    X. Liu and M. C. Hersam, 2D materials for quantum information science, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 669 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Wendin, Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits : a review, Rep

    G. Wendin, Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits : a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 106001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Nadeem, M

    M. Nadeem, M. S. Fuhrer, and X. Wang, The superconducting diode effect, Nat. Rev. Phys, 5, 558 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    N. F. Q. Yuan and L. Fu, Supercurrent diode effect and finite -momentum superconductors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    F. Ando, Y. Miyasaka, T. Li, J. Ishizuka, T. Arakawa, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Observation of superconducting diode effect, Nature 584, 373 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Bauriedl, C

    L. Bauriedl, C. Bäuml, L. Fuchs, C . Baumgartner, N. Paulik, J. M. Bauer, K.-Q. Lin, J. M. Lupton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, C. Strunk, and N. Paradiso, Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few - layer NbSe 2, Nat. Commun. 13, 4266 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Gutfreund, H

    A. Gutfreund, H. Matsuki, V . Plastovets, A. Noah, L. Gorzawski, N. Fridman, G. Yang, A. Buzdin, O. Millo, J. W. A. Robinson, and Y. *Contact author: qiyp@shanghaitech.edu.cn, hewy@shanghaitech.edu.cn, linxiao@westlake.edu.cn Anahory, Direct observation of a superconducting vo...

    2023

  5. [13]

    T. Le, Z. Pan, Z. Xu, J. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Lou, X. Yang, Z. Wang, Y. Yao, C. Wu, and X. Lin, Superconducting diode effect and interference patterns in kagome CsV 3Sb5, Nature 630, 64 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    J.-X. Lin, P. Siriviboon, H. D. Scammell, S. Liu, D. Rhodes, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, M. S. Scheurer, an d J. I. A. Li, Zero -field superconducting diode effect in small -twist- angle trilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 18, 1221 (2022)

    2022

  7. [15]

    Z. Wan, G. Qiu, H. Ren, Q. Qian, Y. Li, D. Xu, J. Zhou, J. Zhou, B. Zhou, L. Wang, T.-H. Yang, Z. Sofer, Y. Huang, K. L. Wang, and X. Duan, Unconventional superconductivity in chiral molecule-TaS 2 hybrid superlattices, Nature 632, 69 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Daido, Y

    A. Daido, Y. Ikeda, and Y. Yanase, Intrinsic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  9. [17]

    J. J. He, Y. Tanaka , and N. Nagaosa, A phenomenological theory of superconductor diodes, New J. Phys. 24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    I l i ć a n d F

    S . I l i ć a n d F . S . B e r g e r e t , T h e o r y o f t h e supercurrent diode effect in Rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Y. Li, D. Yan, Y. Hong, H. Sheng, A. Wang, Z. Dou, X. Guo, X. Shi, Z. Su, Z. Lyu, T. Qian, G. Liu, F. Qu, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, Y. Shi, Z.-A. Xu, J. Hu, L. Lu, and J. Shen, Interfering Josephson diode effect in Ta 2Pd3Te5 asymmetric edge interferometer, Nat. Commun. 15, 9031 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    F. Liu, Y. M. Itahashi, S. Aoki, Y. Dong, Z. Wang, N. Ogawa, T. Ideue, and Y. Iwasa, Superconducting diode effect under time - reversal symmetry, Sci. Adv. 10, eado1502 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    Narita, J

    H. Narita, J. Ishizuka, R. Kawaraza ki, D. Kan, Y. Shiota, T. Moriyama, Y. Shimakawa, A. V. Ognev, A. S. Samardak, Y. Yanase, and T. Ono, Field-free superconducting diode effect in noncentrosymmetric superconductor/ferromagnet multilayers, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 823 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    B. Pal, A. Ch akraborty, P. K. Sivakumar, M. Davydova, A. K. Gopi, A. K. Pandeya, J. A. Krieger, Y. Zhang, M. Date, S. Ju, N. Yuan, N. B. M. Schröter, L. Fu, and S. S. P. Parkin, Josephson diode effect from Cooper pair momentum in a topological semimetal, Nat. Phys. 18, 1228 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    S. Qi, J. Ge, C. Ji, Y. Ai, G. Ma, Z. Wang, Z. Cui, Y. Liu, Z. Wang, and J. Wang, High - temperature field -free superconducting diode effect in high -T c cuprates, Nat. Commun. 16, 531 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    J. Ma, H. Wang, W. Zhuo, B. Lei, S. Wang, W. Wang, X. -Y. Chen, Z. -Y. Wang, B. Ge, Z. Wang, J. Tao, K. Jiang, Z. Xiang, and X. -H. Chen, Field -free Josephson diode effect in NbSe2 van der Waals junction, Commun. Phys. 8, 125 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Baumgartner, L

    C. Baumgartner, L. Fuchs, A. Costa, S. Reinhardt, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, T. Lindemann, M. J. Manfra, P. E. Faria Junior, D. Kochan, J. Fabian, N. Paradiso, and C. Strunk, Supercurrent rectification and magnetochiral effects in symmetric Josephson junctions, Nat. Nanotechnol...

    2021

  18. [26]

    Davydova, S

    M. Davydova, S. Prem babu, and L. Fu, Universal Josephson diode effect, Sci. Adv. 8, eabo0309 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Gupta, G

    M. Gupta, G. V. Graziano, M. Pendharkar, J. T. Dong, C. P. Dempsey, C. Palmstrøm, and V. S. Pribiag, Gate -tunable superconducting diode effect in a three-terminal Josephson device, Nat. Commun. 14, 3078 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Y. Hou, F. Nichele, H. Chi, A. Lodesani, Y. Wu, M. F. Ritter, D. Z. Haxell, M. Davydova, S. Ilić, O. Glezakou -Elbert, A. Varambally, F. S. Bergeret, A. Kamra, L. Fu, P. A. Lee, and J. S. Moodera, Ubiquitous superconducting diode effect in superconductor thin films, Phys. Rev....

    2023

  21. [29]

    J. Hu, C. Wu, and X. Dai, Proposed design of a Josephson diode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 067004 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    Kim, K.-R

    J.-K. Kim, K.-R. Jeon, P. K. Sivakumar, J. Jeon, C. Koerner, G. Woltersdorf, and S. S. P. Parkin, Intrinsic supercurrent non -reciprocity coupled to the crystal structure of a van der Waals Josephson barrier, Nat. Commun. 15, 1120 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Matsuo, T

    S. Matsuo, T. Imoto, T. Yokoyama, Y. Sato, T. Lindemann, S. Gronin, G. C. Gardner, M. J. Manfra, and S. Tarucha, Josephson diode effect derived from short -range coherent coupling, Nat. Phys. 19, 1636 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Misaki and N

    K. Misaki and N. Nagaosa, Theory of the nonreciprocal Josephson effect, Phys. Rev. B 103, 245302 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    H. Wu, Y. Wang, Y. Xu, P. K. Sivakumar, C. Pasco, U. Filippozzi, S. S. P. Parkin, Y.-J. Zeng, T. McQueen, and M. N. Ali, The field -free Josephson diode in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature 604, 653 (2022). *Contact author: qiyp@shanghaitech.edu.cn, hewy@shanghaitech.edu...

    2022

  26. [34]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Gu, P. Li, J. Hu, and K. Jiang, General theory of Josephson diodes, Phys. Rev. X 12, 041013 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    S. Y. F. Zhao, X. Cui, P. A. Volkov, H. Yoo, S. Lee, J. A. Gardener, A. J. Akey, R. Engelke, Y. Ronen, R. Zhong, G. Gu, S. Plugge, T. Tummuru, M. Kim, M. Franz, J. H. Pixley, N . Poccia, and P. Kim, Time -reversal symmetry breaking superconductivity between twisted cuprate sup...

    2023

  28. [36]

    J. Ma, R. Zhan, and X. Lin, Superconducting diode effects: mechanisms, materials and applications, Adv. Phys. Re s. 4, 2400180 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    G. Hu, Y. Han, W. Yu, S. Lv, Y. Li, Z. Gong, H. Guo, K. Zhu, Z. Zhao, Q. Qi, G. Xian, L. Bao, X. Lin, J. Pan, S. Du, H. Yang, and H.- J. Gao, Tunable zero -field superconducting diode effect in two -dimensional ferromagnetic/superconducting Fe 3GeTe2/NbSe2 heterostructure, Nan...

    2025

  30. [38]

    Nagata, M

    U. Nagata, M. Aoki, A. Daido, S. Kasahara, Y. Kasahara, R. Ohshima, Y. Ando, Y. Yanase, Y. Matsuda, and M. Shiraishi, Field -free superconducting diode effect in layered superconductor FeSe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 236703 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    X. Xi, Z. Wang, W. Zhao, J.-H. Park, K. T. Law, H. Berger, L. Forró, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Ising pairing in superconducting NbSe 2 atomic layers, Nat. Phys. 12, 139 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    S. C. de la Barrera, M. R. Sinko, D. P. Gopalan, N. Sivadas, K. L. Seyler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. W. Tsen, X. Xu, D. Xiao, and B. M. Hunt, Tuning Ising superconductivity with layer and spin -orbit coupling in two - dimensional transition -metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Com...

    2018

  33. [41]

    E. Sohn, X. Xi, W. Y. He, S. Jiang, Z. Wang, K. Kang, J. H. Park, H. Berger, L. Forro, K. T. Law, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, An unusual continuous paramagnetic-limited superconducting phase transition in 2D NbSe 2, Nat. Mater. 17, 504 (2018)

    2018

  34. [42]

    Hamill, B

    A. Hamill, B. Heischmidt, E. Sohn, D. Shaffer, K.-T. Tsai, X. Zhang, X. Xi, A. Suslov, H. Berger, L. Forró, F. J. Burnell, J. Shan, K. F. Mak, R. M. Fernandes, K. Wang, and V. S. Pribiag, Two-fold symmetric superconductivity in few-layer NbSe2, Nat. Phys. 17, 949 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    C. W. Cho, J. Lyu, L. An, T. Han, K. T. Lo, C. Y. Ng, J. Hu, Y. Gao, G. Li, M. Huang, N. Wang, J. Schmalian, and R. Lortz, Nodal and nematic superconducting phases in NbSe 2 monolayers from competing superconducting channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 087002 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    P. Wan, O. Zheliuk, N. F. Q. Yuan, X. Peng, L. Zhang, M. Liang, U. Zeitler, S. Wiedmann, N. E. Hussey, T. T. M. Palstra, and J. Ye, Orbital Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state in an Ising superconductor, Nature 619, 46 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Y. Guo, C. Liu, Q. Yin, C. Wei, S. Lin, T. B. Hoffman, Y. Zhao, J. H. Edgar, Q. Chen, S. P. Lau, J. Dai, H. Yao, H. S. Wong, and Y. Chai, Distinctive in-plane cleavage behaviors of two- dimensional layered materials, ACS Nano 10, 8980 (2016)

    2016

  38. [46]

    T. X. Huang, X. Cong, S. S. Wu, K. Q. Lin, X. Yao, Y. H. He, J. B. Wu, Y. F. Bao, S. C. Huang, X. Wang, P. H. Tan, and B. Ren, Probing the edge-related properties of atomically thin MoS 2 at nanoscale, Nat. Commun. 10, 5544 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    See Supplemental Material for Method, Electrical Transports, Second -Harmonic Generation Measurements, which includes Refs. [47-51]

  40. [48]

    P. N. Butcher and D. Cotter, The elements of nonlinear optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1990), Cambridge Studies in Modern Optics

    1990

  41. [49]

    R. W. Boyd, in Nonlinear Optics (Academic Press, 2020), pp. 273

    2020

  42. [50]

    Berthier, P

    C. Berthier, P. Molinié, and D. Jérome, Evidence for a connection between charge density waves and the pressure enhancement of superconductivity in 2 H-NbSe2, Solid State Commun. 18, 1393 (1976)

    1976

  43. [51]

    Suderow, V

    H. Suderow, V. G. Tissen, J. P. Brison, J. L. Martínez, and S. Vieira, Pressure induced effects on the Fermi surface of superconducting 2H-NbSe 2., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 117006 (2005)

    2005

  44. [52]

    Younus, Y

    K. Younus, Y. Zhou, M. Zhu, D. Xu, X. Guo, A. Ahmed, F. Ouyang, H. Huang, S. Xiao, Z. Chen, and J. He, Observation of anisotropic second harmonic generation in two - dimensional niobium diselenide, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 4992 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    H. Yu, D. Yan, Z. Guo, Y. Zhou, X. Yang, P. Li, Z. Wang, X. Xiang, J. Li, X. Ma, R. Zhou, F. Hong, Y. Wuli, Y. Shi, J.- T. Wang, and X. Yu, Observation of emergent superconductivity in the topological insulator Ta 2Pd3Te5 via pressure manipulation, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 3890 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    L. Cao, Y. Xue, Y. Wang, F.-C. Zhang, J. Kang, H.-J. Gao, J. Mao, and Y. Jiang, Directly visualizing nematic superconductivity driven *Contact author: qiyp@shanghaitech.edu.cn, hewy@shanghaitech.edu.cn, linxiao@westlake.edu.cn by the pair density wave in NbSe 2, Nat. Commun. 1...

    2024

  47. [55]

    He and K

    W.-Y. He and K. T. Law, Magnetoelectric effects in gyrotropic superconductors, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012073(R) (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Dissipation - enhanced non -reciprocal superconductivity: application to multi -valley superconductors, Phys. Rev. Appl. 24, L031004 (2025)

    2025

  49. [57]

    Daido and Y

    A. Daido and Y. Yanase, Unidirectional superconductivity and superconducting diode effect induced by dissipation, arXiv: 2310.02539 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Morimoto and N

    T. Morimoto and N. Nagaosa, Nonreciprocal current from electron interactions in noncentrosymmetric crystals: roles of time reversal symmetry and dissipation, Sci. Rep. 8, 2973 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Wickramaratne, S

    D. Wickramaratne, S. Khmelevskyi, D. F. Agterberg, and I. I. Mazin, Ising Superconductivity and magnetism in NbSe 2, Phys. Rev. X 10, 041003 (2020)

    2020

  52. [60]

    Y. Xu, X. Liu, and W. Guo, Tensile strain induced switching of magnetic states in NbSe 2 and NbS 2 single layers, Nanoscale 6, 12929 (2014)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.