Gravitational redshift as a quantum channel: modeling the effects of gravitational redshift in quantum optics

Andreas Wolfgang Schell; David Edward Bruschi; Thomas Mieling

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Gravitational redshift as a quantum channel: modeling the effects of gravitational redshift in quantum optics

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Gravitational redshift cannot be reduced to a finite multi-mode mixer; the paper replaces it with a Gaussian quantum channel.

desk verdict A solid no-go theorem plus a useful Gaussian channel model for gravitational redshift; the central results hold, but the fidelity section needs fixing and the auxiliary vacuum is a stipulated convention, not a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.03549 v2 pith:AK5D733J submitted 2026-08-04 quant-ph gr-qc

Thomas Mieling , Andreas Wolfgang Schell , David Edward Bruschi This is my paper · ORCID

classification quant-phgr-qc

keywords gravitationalredshiftquantumchannelGaussianstatesmulti-modemixerunitarydilationfrequency-shiftoperatorcovariancematrixnon-unitarity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to put the quantum description of gravitational redshift on firm ground. It proves that the previously proposed 'multi-mode mixer' model—a linear transformation acting on a finite set of photon modes—fails because the frequency-shift operator $U_\chi$ on $L^2(\mathbb{R}_+)$ has no finite-dimensional invariant subspace of well-behaved spectra unless $\chi=1$. It then offers two consistent replacements: a field-theoretic compression approach in which single-photon transmission amplitudes are just the inner products $(f_i, U_\chi f_j)$, and a dilation approach that embeds those amplitudes in a unitary matrix on a doubled Hilbert space. The second approach yields an explicit Gaussian quantum channel—a completely positive, trace-preserving map on quantum states—for the transmitted modes, making the redshift accessible to standard quantum-information tools. This matters because it converts a previously inconsistent model into a testable channel description valid for arbitrarily strong frequency shifts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the unitary frequency-shift operator $U_\chi$, defined by $(U_\chi f)(\omega)=\chi^{-1}f(\chi^{-2}\omega)$, which encodes how a wave-packet spectrum transforms between stationary observers with redshift parameter $\chi$. Its moments scale as $\mu_k[U_\chi f]=\chi^{2k}\mu_k[f]$, and that scaling is what forces the no-go theorem: a finite invariant subspace would have to consist of spectra with infinite moments. The paper then works with the finite-dimensional compression $u_\chi = P_V U_\chi|_V$, whose entries are the measurable transition amplitudes, and with the Halmos unitary dilation $\Upsilon_\chi$ on $V\oplus V$. Second-quantizing that dilation yields a Bogolyubov transformation, and restricting to the physical modes produces the Gaussian channel $\mathcal{N}_\chi(\Sigma)=X_\chi \Sigma X_\chi^\dagger + Y_\chi$ with $Y_\chi=I-u_\chi u_\chi^\dagger$. This machinery turns a functional-analytic obstruction into a concrete channel-plus-noise description.

What would settle it

Send a squeezed single-mode state through a well-characterized stationary gravitational redshift, such as a ground-to-geostationary uplink, and tomograph the output covariance matrix; the channel predicts added noise $Y_\chi=I-u_\chi u_\chi^\dagger$ and, for an initially pure state, a fidelity that stays $1$ for unsqueezed states. Observing different added noise, or any fidelity drop for an unsqueezed coherent state, would refute the model.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The core claim is a no-go theorem plus a constructive solution. For any finite set $B=\{f_i\}$ of frequency spectra with finite moments of some order $k>0$, the span of $B$ is invariant under the redshift operator $(U_\chi f)(\omega)=\chi^{-1} f(\chi^{-2}\omega)$ if and only if $\chi=1$. Therefore, for $\chi\neq 1$, the matrix $u_{ij}(\chi)=(f_i, U_\chi f_j)$ is a non-unitary compression of $U_\chi$ rather than a restriction, and no finite collection of physically reasonable mode functions can close under redshift. The paper's resolution is to treat that compression as the complete single-photon description, or to dilate it with the Halmos construction to a unitary $\Upsilon_\chi$ on $V\oplus V$; second-quantizing $\Upsilon_\chi$ and tracing out the auxiliary modes gives the Gaussian channel $\mathcal{N}_\chi(\Sigma)=X_\chi \Sigma X_\chi^\dagger + Y_\chi$ with $Y_\chi = I - u_\chi u_\chi^\dagger$. The non-unitarity of $u_\chi$ is thus not photon loss but the natural shadow of a unitary operator on a finite, non-invariant mode set.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing physical convention is that the auxiliary modes introduced by the Halmos dilation begin in the vacuum state and remain completely unobservable, since the noise term $Y_\chi=I-u_\chi u_\chi^\dagger$ is derived from that choice even though the field theory does not force it; the finite-moment regularity condition on the spectra is a second, milder premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Single-photon transmission amplitudes between stationary observers are exactly $(f_i, U_\chi f_j)$, so no auxiliary perpendicular modes are needed for predictions, and photon number is preserved for arbitrarily strong shifts.
No finite unitary matrix can represent the redshift of well-behaved spectra unless $\chi=1$; the non-unitarity seen in earlier models is a projection artifact rather than photon loss.
For Gaussian input states the redshift becomes a computable Gaussian channel, opening the covariance-matrix toolbox for satellite-based quantum communication and channel-capacity studies.
The channel nonunitarity $\eta(\chi)=1-\frac{1}{n}\sum_{i,j}|u_{ij}(\chi)|^2$ is state-independent, symmetric under $\chi\leftrightarrow 1/\chi$, and the filtered round trip obeys $\eta_{\updownarrow}(\chi)\geq \eta_{\uparrow}(\chi)$, making round trips strictly more nonunitary.
For an initially pure state, fidelity reduction under redshift appears only when the state is squeezed; unsqueezed coherent states keep unit fidelity, so squeezing is the resource that makes the effect visible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the channel is truly Gaussian, the classical and quantum capacities of a redshifted link are fixed by $X_\chi$ and $Y_\chi$; computing them would show whether gravitational redshift itself can degrade or assist communication beyond the loss implied by the noise term.
The vacuum state chosen for the auxiliary modes is one convention among many; equipping the dilation with thermal or squeezed auxiliary states would produce different effective channels, and comparing these with multi-photon field-theoretic amplitudes could identify the physically correct dilation.
The no-go theorem implies that any finite-dimensional frequency-mode code will suffer an irreducible redshift-induced noise floor; encoding over a continuum of modes may be required to keep the shift effectively unitary.
A tabletop test could use a tunable frequency-shifting element that approximates $U_\chi$ and tomograph squeezed vacuum before and after; the predicted added-noise matrix $Y_\chi=I-u_\chi u_\chi^\dagger$ is specific enough that failure would point to non-Gaussian or non-vacuum auxiliary dynamics.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The headline: this is the first paper to my knowledge that both explains why the multi-mode mixer model fails and supplies a workable replacement. The no-go theorem (no regular finite-dimensional invariant subspace of U_chi for chi≠1) is correct under the stated finite-moment assumption, and it pins the blame exactly where it belongs: the earlier MMM matrices mix a compression with a restriction. The two repair strategies—using the compression directly for transmission amplitudes, and using the Halmos dilation to build a unitary on a doubled space—are both clean. The resulting Gaussian channel (52) is simple and operational, and the channel nonunitarity measure (61) is a nice state-independent way to quantify the deviation.

What's good: the field-theoretic derivation of u_ij as the actual single-photon amplitude is careful and puts the compression on a firm basis. The extension to arbitrary redshift magnitude is a genuine improvement over earlier weak-field treatments. The paper is honest that the auxiliary modes are unobservable and that you only need u to compute predictions.

The soft spots are local. The proof of the theorem contains a misstated Cauchy-Schwarz bound in Eq. (27): the term should be sqrt(mu_k(f_j)), not mu_k(f_j). That's a typo, not a logical gap. More serious is the fidelity section. The formula (56) is borrowed from the two-mode Gaussian literature and then used for an arbitrary number of modes; the normalization is off (identical pure states give F=2 with their Eq. (58)), and the derivation ignores first moments entirely. That makes the claim that squeezing is the only resource for seeing fidelity loss look too strong—for coherent states, the displacement mismatch alone reduces fidelity via |<ψ|ψ'>|^2, which their covariance-only formula misses. The section needs to be rewritten or restricted to zero-displacement states.

The other caveat is the one the stress-test flagged: the Gaussian channel depends on the auxiliary modes starting in the vacuum. The paper calls this "natural," and it is a minimal-entropy convention, but it is not derived from the field theory. That's not fatal—the channel is a well-defined model that reproduces the correct single-photon amplitudes—but readers should know the channel is not the unique field-theoretic prediction without that convention.

Who's this for? People working on relativistic quantum communication, satellite QKD, or quantum optics in curved spacetime. It's a serious contribution that deserves a proper referee: the central theorem and channel hold up, and the flaws are fixable. I'd recommend accepting with minor to moderate revisions, with the fidelity section the main thing to fix.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the quantum-mechanical description of the gravitational frequency shift of photons in stationary spacetimes. The authors identify the frequency-shift operator U_χ on L^2(R_+) defined in Eq. (11), and prove a no-go theorem: if {f_i} is a finite set of spectra with finite moments of some order k>0, then their span is invariant under U_χ if and only if χ=1. Hence, for χ≠1, the matrix u_ij(χ)=(f_i,U_χ f_j) is a non-unitary compression of U_χ, which explains the reported failure of unitarity in the multi-mode mixer (MMM) model. The paper proposes two corrections: a 'self-contained' field-theoretic approach that uses the compression directly without matrix representations, and a unitary Halmos dilation Υ_χ on V⊕V (Eq. (39)) that reproduces the transmission amplitudes while remaining unitary. From this dilation, the authors construct a Gaussian quantum channel N_χ(Σ)=X_χ Σ X_χ† + Y_χ (Eq. (52)) by tracing out auxiliary modes that are initially in the vacuum state. They study the channel fidelity, introduce a state-independent 'channel nonunitarity' measure, and analyze a round-trip protocol with a spectral filter at the intermediate station.

Significance. The paper makes a substantive contribution to a current debate in quantum optics about the validity of the MMM model for gravitational redshift. The no-go theorem identifies a clear mathematical obstruction (the absence of regular finite-dimensional invariant subspaces), and the explicit Halmos dilation provides a constructive way to apply quantum-information-theoretic tools, including the covariance-matrix formalism for Gaussian states. The channel formula and the nonunitarity measure are explicit, analytically derived, and ready for numerical implementation. If the issues raised below are addressed, the paper should be of interest to the relativistic-quantum-information community.

major comments (2)

[Section II, Eq. (27)] In the proof of the Theorem, the bound in Eq. (27) is not a valid application of Cauchy–Schwarz and is false in general: for a single normalized function f with μ_k(f)<1 it would give μ_k(f) ≤ μ_k(f)^2. The correct bound is μ_k(f'_i) ≤ (∑_j |α_ij| ∥f_j∥ √(μ_k(f_j)))^2 / ∥f'_i∥^2, where ∥f'_i∥=1 for the orthonormal basis employed. Since the Theorem also follows directly from the Proposition, the conclusion is not in doubt, but the proof as written needs a corrected inequality or should be replaced by the direct argument.
[Section IV.B, Eqs. (50a)-(50b)] The Gaussian channel N_χ of Eq. (52) is derived under the assumption that the auxiliary degrees of freedom of the Halmos dilation are initially in the vacuum state and are unobservable after the trace. This condition is called 'natural' but is not derived from the field theory of Section III.A. The dilation is not unique, and different initial states of the auxiliary modes would yield different reduced channels, changing predictions such as fidelity and channel capacity. The authors should either justify this vacuum boundary condition from the physical setup or explicitly state that the channel is one possible effective model and examine the sensitivity of the results to this convention.

minor comments (5)

[Section IV.D, Eq. (63)] The round-trip channel is stated without a derivation. Please show explicitly how the composition of N_χ, the spectral filter at the intermediate node, and N_{1/χ} leads to the form (63), particularly the noise term I - Z_χ Z_χ†.
[Section II, Eq. (18)] The notation |n|! for negative n is nonstandard; please define it (presumably (−n)! for n<0) or rewrite the Laurent expansion with separate sums over positive and negative n.
[Figure 2] The caption defines α = ln(ω_0/σ) but does not give the actual values of ω_0 and σ used in the numerical plots; please state the full parametrization of the Gaussian spectra and the integration method used.
[Throughout] The abbreviation 'mmm' appears in lowercase in the abstract and in uppercase 'MMM' in the body; please unify.
[Section V] The statement that 'the present analysis extends these results to arbitrarily strong gravitational frequency shifts' is supported for the formal model, but the authors should note that the stationary-spacetime assumption (and restriction to geostationary orbits for satellite applications) remains a limitation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the no-go theorem and channel construction are self-contained, and prior self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central no-go theorem (Section II) is proved in-line from the definition of U_chi and the moment scaling relation mu_k[U_chi f] = chi^(2k) mu_k[f]: if a finite set of spectra with finite moments spanned an invariant subspace, then chi would have to equal 1. This is an independent mathematical argument and does not rely on the cited criticism [12], even though that criticism is acknowledged as motivation. The compression u_chi in Eq. (29) and the Halmos dilation in Eq. (39) are standard constructions, and the Gaussian channel N_chi in Eq. (52) is explicitly assembled from u_chi, with the stated assumption of vacuum auxiliary modes in Eq. (50). That assumption is a transparent modeling convention rather than a fitted parameter disguised as a prediction, and the channel is presented as a model that reproduces the field-theoretic amplitudes (43) by construction. The predictions derived from the channel, such as fidelity and the channel nonunitarity, are computed consequences of this explicit model rather than independent empirical outputs that secretly coincide with the inputs. Prior self-citations [10-12,19] supply motivation, notation, and comparison, but the load-bearing steps are either rederived in the text or proved from first principles here. There is therefore no circularity of the kind prohibited; the main caveat, that the channel depends on the vacuum state of the unobserved auxiliary modes, is a physical modeling assumption and not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The model rests on standard stationary-spacetime frequency relations, standard Fock quantization assumptions, the regularity of physically relevant spectra, and the stipulated vacuum state for the auxiliary dilation modes. There are no data-fitted free parameters.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Stationary spacetime with timelike Killing vector; observer frequency relates to Killing frequency by ω_a ζ_a = constant, giving the Uχ transformation of Eq. (11).
Section I, Eqs. (2)-(3). If this frequency relation or the identification of observer frequencies fails, the central operator Uχ and all subsequent results change.
domain assumption The wave-packet inner product and rescaled spectra are defined so that Uχ is unitary on L2(R+) (Eqs. (5)-(11)).
Section I. The choice f_a = sqrt(ζ_a) f(ω_a ζ_a) is a convention that makes the transformation unitary; physical conclusions follow from this convention.
domain assumption Standard Fock quantization in curved spacetime: single-photon states are created by ladder operators â†(f) with commutators given by Klein-Gordon products, and â(f) = b̂(Uχ f).
Section III.A, Eqs. (30)-(32). Assumes standard QFT in stationary spacetimes without particle creation.
domain assumption Physically relevant frequency spectra have finite moments of some order k>0 (regularity), excluding irregular invariant subspaces.
Section II, Theorem. The no-go theorem relies on this; spectra with infinite moments could admit finite-dimensional invariant subspaces.
standard math Halmos dilation theorem: any contraction u on a Hilbert space has a unitary dilation on V⊕V of the form Eq. (39).
Section III.B, Eq. (39). Standard operator-theory result; the paper cites Robinson [26].
ad hoc to paper Auxiliary modes introduced by the dilation are initially in the vacuum state and are unobservable after tracing (Eq. (50)).
Section IV.B. This boundary condition is not derived from field theory; it is stipulated to obtain the Gaussian channel (52). Different auxiliary initial states would yield different reduced channels.
standard math Gaussian states are fully characterized by displacement and covariance; the fidelity formulas (56)-(60) as applied assume two-mode Gaussian states (or correct n-mode normalization).
Section IV.C. Uses Gaussian quantum information results [27-34]; the prefactor 4 in Eq. (58) is valid for two modes, so applying it beyond two modes would require the 2^n prefactor.

invented entities (1)

Auxiliary modes added by the Halmos dilation
purpose: To extend the non-unitary compression uχ to a unitary operator Υχ on V⊕V, enabling a Gaussian quantum channel description after tracing them out.
The dilation Υχ in Eq. (39) acts on an extra copy of the mode space. These auxiliary modes are assumed unobservable and initially in vacuum (Eq. (50)); there is no experimental handle on them, and the reduced channel is the only observable content.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Gravitational redshift as a quantum channel: modeling the effects of gravitational redshift in quantum optics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AK5D733J

@misc{pith2026260803549,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Gravitational redshift as a quantum channel: modeling the effects of gravitational redshift in quantum optics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AK5D733J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03549}
}

read the original abstract

The gravitational frequency shift of light is well understood in the theory of classical electromagnetism. Nevertheless, its description in quantum theory is not yet fully developed. Recent work pointed out inconsistencies in previously developed models aimed at describing the gravitational redshift as an effective multi-mode mixer (MMM) acting on modes of light, but so far a complete solution of these issues was not obtained. Here, we identify the root cause of the MMM model's inconsistency and provide two complementary approaches to correct it: a "natural" one from a field-theoretic perspective, and another adapted to the language of quantum mechanics of finite-dimensional systems. We show that the second approach allows for modeling of the redshift in a multi-mode transmission setup as a quantum channel that can be characterized using standard quantum information-theoretic techniques when restricting the input states to Gaussian states of light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.03549 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Plots of the parameters 𝛾1 and 𝛾2 , defined in Eqs. (24a) and (24b), that quantify the violation of the mmm model. Here, 𝛼 = ln(𝜔0/𝜎) parametrizes the relative width of the Gaussian frequency spectra, where 𝜔0 is the central frequency and 𝜎 is the spectral width. Clearly, the mmm prediction 𝛾1 = 𝛾2 = 1 is violated for all 𝜒 ≠ 1, with deviations from these values increasing with 𝜒 − 1 and the “sharpness” of the Gauss… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Visual representation of the construction of the Gaussian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Round-trip protocol: A photon is sent from site a to site b, where the received frequency spectrum deviates from the one emitted by a (Panel a). At site b, the wave-packet’s frequency spectrum is modified by means of imperfect reflection or an appropriate projective me…

Review history (3 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[1]

Einstein, Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus dem- selben gezogenen Folgerungen, Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik4, 411 (1908)

A. Einstein, Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus dem- selben gezogenen Folgerungen, Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik4, 411 (1908)

work page 1908
[2]

R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka, Apparent Weight of Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.4, 337 (1960)

work page 1960
[3]

J. I. González Hernández, R. Rebolo, L. Pasquini, G. Lo Curto,P.Molaro,E.Caffau,H.-G.Ludwig,M.Steffen,M.Es- posito,A.SuárezMascareño,B.Toledo-Padrón,R.A.Probst, T. W. Hänsch, R. Holzwarth, A. Manescau, T. Steinmetz, T.Udem,andT.Wilken,Thesolargravitationalredshiftfrom HARPS-LFC Moon spectra. A test of the general theory of relativity, A&A643, A146 (2020),...

work page Pith review arXiv 2020
[4]

Zheng, J

X. Zheng, J. Dolde, M. C. Cambria, H. M. Lim, and S. Kolkowitz, A lab-based test of the gravitational redshift with a miniature clock network, Nature Communications14, 4886 (2023), arXiv:2207.07145 [physics.atom-ph]

arXiv 2023
[5]

R. M. Wald,General relativity(Chicago University Press, 1984)

work page 1984
[6]

Redshifts and Killing Vectors

A. Harvey, E. Schucking, and E. J. Surowitz, Redshifts and Killingvectors,AmericanJournalofPhysics74,1017(2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0508125 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[7]

Spherical scalar waves and gravity - red shift and backscattering

E. Malec, N. Ó Murchadha, and T. Chmaj, Spherical scalar waves and gravity - redshift and backscattering, Classical and Quantum Gravity15, 1653 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9712022 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[8]

Schwarzschild horizon and the gravitational redshift formula

E. Malec, Schwarzschild horizon and the gravitational red- shiftformula,ClassicalandQuantumGravity19,571(2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0110073 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002

Show all 34 references

[9]

Karkowski and E

J. Karkowski and E. Malec, Gravitational redshifts in elec- tromagnetic bursts occurring near Schwarzschild horizon, Classical and Quantum Gravity20, 85 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0211104 [gr-qc]

2003
[10]

D. E. Bruschi and A. W. Schell, Gravitational Redshift Induces Quantum Interference, Annalen der Physik535, 2200468 (2023), arXiv:2109.00728 [quant-ph]

2023 arXiv
[11]

L. A. Alanís Rodríguez, A. W. Schell, and D. E. Bruschi, Introduction to gravitational redshift of quantum photons propagating in curved spacetime, inJournal of Physics Conference Series, Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 2531 (IOP, 2023) p. 012016, arXiv:2303.17412 [...

2023 arXiv
[12]

Leber, L

N. Leber, L. A. Alanís Rodríguez, A. Ferreri, A. W. Schell, and D. E. Bruschi, Limits to the validity of gravitational redshift as a quantum-optical multimode mixer, Interna- tional Journal of Theoretical Physics65, 10.1007/s10773- 026-06297-2 (2026)

2026 doi
[13]

T. B. Mieling and M. Hudelist, Fiber optics in curved space-times, Physical Review Research7, 013162 (2025), arXiv:2410.23048 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[14]

T. B. Mieling, T. Morling, C. Hilweg, and P. Walther, Quantum interferometry in external gravitational fields, Phys. Rev. A112, 062211 (2025), arXiv:2507.21808 [gr- qc]

2025
[15]

A. I. Harte, Self-forces from generalized Killing fields, Classical and Quantum Gravity25, 235020 (2008), arXiv:0807.1150 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[16]

R. M. Wald,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time and Black Hole Thermodynamics, Chicago Lectures in Physics (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1995)

1995
[17]

Srednicki,Quantum Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

M. Srednicki,Quantum Field Theory(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

2007
[18]

C.ItzyksonandJ.-B.Zuber,QuantumFieldTheory(McGraw- Hill International Book Company, 1980)

1980
[19]

D. E. Bruschi, T. C. Ralph, I. Fuentes, T. Jennewein, and M. Razavi, Spacetime effects on satellite-based quan- tum communications, Phys. Rev. D90, 045041 (2014), arXiv:1309.3088 [quant-ph]

2014 arXiv
[20]

D. E. Bruschi, S. Chatzinotas, F. K. Wilhelm, and A. W. Schell, Spacetime effects on wavepackets of coherent light, Phys. Rev. D104, 085015 (2021), arXiv:2106.12424 [quant- ph]

2021 arXiv
[21]

J.DerezińskiandC.Gérard,MathematicsofQuantizationand Quantum Fields, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2022)

2022
[22]

K.HoffmanandR.Kunze,LinearAlgebra,2nded.(Prentice- Hall, 1971)

1971
[23]

P. R. Halmos,A Hilbert Space Problem Book, 2nd ed. (Springer, 1982)

1982
[24]

Ashtekar and A

A. Ashtekar and A. Magnon, Quantum Fields in Curved Space-Times, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A346, 375 (1975)

1975
[25]

S. A. Fulling,Aspects of Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime, London Mathematical Society Student Texts No. 17 (Cambridge University Press, 1989)

1989
[26]

P. L. Robinson, Julia operators and Halmos dilations (2018), arXiv:1803.09329 [math.FA]

2018 arXiv
[27]

Adesso, S

G. Adesso, S. Ragy, and A. R. Lee, Continuous variable quantum information: Gaussian states and beyond, Open Systems & Information Dynamics21, 1440001 (2014)

2014
[28]

J.EisertandM.M.Wolf,Gaussianquantumchannels(2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0505151 [quant-ph]

2005 arXiv
[29]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang,Quantum computation and quantum information(Cambridge University Press, 2010)

2010
[30]

Paraoanu and H

G.-S. Paraoanu and H. Scutaru, Fidelity for multimode ther- mal squeezed states, Phys. Rev. A61, 022306 (2000)

2000
[31]

Marian and T

P. Marian and T. A. Marian, Uhlmann fidelity between two- mode gaussian states, Phys. Rev. A86, 022340 (2012)

2012
[32]

T.Heib,P.Lageyre,A.Ferreri,F.K.Wilhelm,G.S.Paraoanu, D.Burgarth,A.W.Schell,andD.EdwardBruschi,Bounding the rotating wave approximation for coupled harmonic oscil- lators, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 58, 175304 (2025)

2025
[33]

Williamson, On the algebraic problem concerning the normalformsoflineardynamicalsystems,AmericanJournal of Mathematics58, 10.2307/2371062 (1936)

H. Williamson, On the algebraic problem concerning the normalformsoflineardynamicalsystems,AmericanJournal of Mathematics58, 10.2307/2371062 (1936)

1936 doi
[34]

S. L. Braunstein, Squeezing as an irreducible resource, Phys. Rev. A71, 055801 (2005)

2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Einstein, Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus dem- selben gezogenen Folgerungen, Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik4, 411 (1908)

A. Einstein, Über das Relativitätsprinzip und die aus dem- selben gezogenen Folgerungen, Jahrbuch der Radioaktivität und Elektronik4, 411 (1908)

work page 1908

[2] [2]

R. V. Pound and G. A. Rebka, Apparent Weight of Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett.4, 337 (1960)

work page 1960

[3] [3]

J. I. González Hernández, R. Rebolo, L. Pasquini, G. Lo Curto,P.Molaro,E.Caffau,H.-G.Ludwig,M.Steffen,M.Es- posito,A.SuárezMascareño,B.Toledo-Padrón,R.A.Probst, T. W. Hänsch, R. Holzwarth, A. Manescau, T. Steinmetz, T.Udem,andT.Wilken,Thesolargravitationalredshiftfrom HARPS-LFC Moon spectra. A test of the general theory of relativity, A&A643, A146 (2020),...

work page Pith review arXiv 2020

[4] [4]

Zheng, J

X. Zheng, J. Dolde, M. C. Cambria, H. M. Lim, and S. Kolkowitz, A lab-based test of the gravitational redshift with a miniature clock network, Nature Communications14, 4886 (2023), arXiv:2207.07145 [physics.atom-ph]

arXiv 2023

[5] [5]

R. M. Wald,General relativity(Chicago University Press, 1984)

work page 1984

[6] [6]

Redshifts and Killing Vectors

A. Harvey, E. Schucking, and E. J. Surowitz, Redshifts and Killingvectors,AmericanJournalofPhysics74,1017(2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0508125 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006

[7] [7]

Spherical scalar waves and gravity - red shift and backscattering

E. Malec, N. Ó Murchadha, and T. Chmaj, Spherical scalar waves and gravity - redshift and backscattering, Classical and Quantum Gravity15, 1653 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9712022 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998

[8] [8]

Schwarzschild horizon and the gravitational redshift formula

E. Malec, Schwarzschild horizon and the gravitational red- shiftformula,ClassicalandQuantumGravity19,571(2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0110073 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2002