Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 40 references

A 16B streaming editor performs 720p video editing at about 30 FPS on one GPU.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

A 16B causal autoregressive diffusion system reports real-time 720p video editing at about 30 FPS on one B200 GPU, beating streaming editors and matching several offline systems in benchmark scores.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A real 30 FPS streaming editor with credible short-video results, but the open-ended claim leans on an internal benchmark and LHAD's 'full-horizon gradient' sentence doesn't survive a close read. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2608.03974 v1 pith:P3Z4H6OU submitted 2026-08-04 cs.CV

JoyAI-Video-Edit: Real-Time Open-Ended Video Editing with Autoregressive Diffusion

Yicheng Xiao , Wenxun Dai , Xinran Qin , Lin Song , Maoquan Zhang , Hang Xu , Yukang Chen , Yitong Li
show 17 more authors
Guohui Zhang Yuan Zhang Xuying Zhang Tommy Zhang Jianlong Yuan Peihao Li Shuai Lu Siming Fu Chuyang Zhao Xin Han Jie Huang Wenbo Li Guoqing Ma Wei Huang Xiaojuan Qi Haoyang Huang Nan Duan
This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords streaming video editingautoregressive diffusiondistribution matching distillationsource-anchored guidancereal-time generationlong-horizon trainingvideo-to-video editingcausal attention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

JoyAI-Video-Edit claims to turn instruction-guided video editing from an offline, fixed-length process into a real-time, open-ended stream. The paper builds a 16B-parameter autoregressive diffusion model that edits video chunk by chunk, without ever seeing future frames or knowing the total duration in advance. To keep quality high despite two-step generation and long streams, it introduces source-anchored distillation that ties each output chunk to the aligned source chunk, plus long-horizon training that exposes the model to its own accumulated errors. If the claims hold, live video editing at interactive rates with stable identity and instruction following becomes practical on a single server GPU.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a single autoregressive diffusion model can perform open-ended, instruction-guided video editing causally and in real time, at 720p and roughly 30 FPS on one Nvidia B200 GPU, while matching or exceeding prior streaming editors and rivaling strong offline editors. The key mechanism is Source-Anchored Distribution Matching Distillation (SA-DMD): during distillation, the real-score teacher applies classifier-free guidance along both the text-conditioning axis and a source-fidelity axis, using the temporally aligned source chunk to counteract drift from imperfect autoregressive history. Because source anchoring is applied only to the training target and distille

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is SA-DMD (Source-Anchored Distribution Matching Distillation): a distillation objective that guides the real-score teacher with separate classifier-free guidance weights for text conditioning and source fidelity, then absorbs the source anchoring into the generator. This lets a two-step generator retain source identity and appearance without a separate source-conditioning branch at deployment. A second mechanism, Long-Horizon Autoregressive Distillation, splits extended rollouts into consecutive clips, computes gradients per clip with a bounded graph, and accumulates gradients across clips to stabilize error-prone late states.

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that source-fidelity control can be fully compressed into the generator during distillation, so that the deployed two-step model keeps source identity and appearance indefinitely without explicit source conditioning at inference.

What would settle it

Run JoyAI-Video-Edit on a continuous video stream longer than one minute, say 10 minutes, with an instruction that remains constant, and measure whether an object's identity, color, or shape drifts or is lost. If the edited output visibly deviates from the source in the later chunks, the assumption that source anchoring distills into the generator would be falsified.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the claims hold, live broadcasting, video communication, and interactive entertainment can use instruction-guided editing on incoming video streams with latency around 226 ms per eight-frame chunk.
  • The two-step distilled generator plus FP8 quantization and bounded KV caching suggests that 16B-parameter video editing can run on a single high-end GPU, not a cluster.
  • Source-anchored distillation may generalize as a recipe for any streaming generative task where the output must stay faithful to a live input while following a changing condition.
  • Long-horizon distillation with segmented gradient accumulation could be applied beyond editing, to any autoregressive diffusion rollout that suffers from compounding errors.
  • The introduction of LongV2VBench, a one-minute editing benchmark, provides a new evaluation standard for sustained streaming editing quality.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's source-anchoring trick suggests a broader principle: for stream-consistent generation, conditioning on the live source is more reliable than conditioning on generated history, and distillation can fold that source dependence into the generator's weights. This principle may transfer to other causal diffusion systems, such as live style transfer or real-time avatar animation.
  • A testable extension would be to vary the source-guidance weight w_src during training and measure the trade-off between editing strength and source fidelity; the paper does not report this sensitivity, and such an analysis could guide deployment choices for different edit types.
  • The 30 FPS figure is reported on a single B200 with FP8 quantization; on consumer hardware or in multi-stream server scenarios, throughput would likely drop, and the paper does not address those operating points.
  • The long-horizon claim rests on one-minute benchmark videos; behavior at ten-minute or hour-long streams, and under instruction changes mid-stream, remains extrapolation from the paper's own evidence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents JoyAI-Video-Edit, a 16B-parameter autoregressive diffusion framework for real-time, open-ended video editing. The system is built from a bidirectional editor, converted to chunk-wise causal generation with bounded-memory attention (a sliding window plus a global first-chunk sink). Two training innovations are proposed: Source-Anchored Distribution Matching Distillation (SA-DMD), which guides the teacher along text and source-fidelity axes and distills both into a two-step generator, and Long-Horizon Autoregressive Distillation (LHAD), a segmented optimization scheme intended to approximate full-horizon gradients. The paper reports 30 FPS at 720p on a single Nvidia B200 GPU, substantial gains over streaming baselines on the external OpenVE-Bench, and a new internally constructed one-minute benchmark (LongV2VBench) on which the proposed method scores highest.

Significance. If the results hold, this would be a significant engineering contribution: it demonstrates that a 16B model can perform causal, instruction-guided video editing at interactive rates, with evidence on an external short-video benchmark and a systematic component ablation. The release of code is a strength, and the runtime analysis is detailed and internally consistent. However, the central 'open-ended / unbounded' claim rests on a self-constructed one-minute benchmark, and the theoretical description of LHAD overstates what the optimization actually computes. The paper is therefore promising but needs additional validation and correction before the long-horizon claims can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4.3] The description of LHAD states: 'compute the SA-DMD backward pass per clip, and clear the graph before generating the next. Gradients are accumulated across clips for a single optimizer step, successfully reflecting the full horizon's gradient.' Clearing the graph between clips severs the differentiable dependency of later clips on earlier generated chunks. Accumulating per-clip gradients is truncated backpropagation through time, not a full-horizon gradient. Please correct this claim, state the clip length used (the paper never gives it), and discuss the approximation being made. This is load-bearing because LHAD is presented as mitigating accumulated temporal drift via full-horizon optimization.
  2. [Sec. 7.2 / Sec. 7.3] The only evidence for the 'open-ended' / 'unbounded' streaming claim is LongV2VBench, a benchmark constructed by the authors, used to tune SA-DMD weights and LHAD (Table 5), and then used as the final evaluation. There is no held-out or external long-video benchmark. Human evaluation (Sec. 7.3) explicitly uses only videos shorter than 10 seconds. Thus the behavior beyond one-minute streams is asserted, not demonstrated. Please add either a held-out long-video evaluation, human evaluation on longer streams, or explicitly restrict the claim to 'one-minute' rather than 'unbounded.'
  3. [Tables 2 and 3] All automatic scores are reported as point estimates from a Gemini judge, but no error bars, number of judged samples, or inter-rater agreement are given. This is particularly problematic in Table 2, where the 'competitive with offline methods' claim rests on differences of 0.02–0.12 against Kling-O1, Kling-3.0 Omni, and Bernini-R. Without variance or significance tests, these comparisons cannot be assessed. Report confidence intervals and the full evaluation protocol (judge prompt, aggregation, number of runs).
  4. [Sec. 4.2] The paper states that by restricting source-anchoring to the training target, 'the source-fidelity control is distilled directly into the generator.' This is a strong assumption about the student's capacity to absorb source fidelity into a single two-step branch. The ablations in Table 5 show SA-DMD improves scores on LongV2VBench, but no direct metric measures source fidelity (e.g., preservation of unedited regions, identity/background similarity over time). Given that long-term source drift is a core motivation, please add a quantitative source-fidelity metric evaluated on long streams, or soften the claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.1] The MLLM description is duplicated verbatim in two consecutive paragraphs. Please remove the redundant paragraph.
  2. [Table 2] The SANA-Streaming row has formatting corruption: '2.293.202.27 1.88' should be split into separate columns. Please fix the table.
  3. [Sec. 4.3] The 'dynamic mirror looping strategy' is described only briefly. Since this is used during training to extend rollouts beyond the source video length, clarify how it is applied, why alternating forward/reversed sequences avoids artifacts, and whether it introduces any train/inference mismatch at deployment.
  4. [Sec. 5 and Table 4] Runtime measurements are reported from a single configuration (batch size 1, 81 frames). Please report the number of measurement runs and variance, and state whether the 30.19 FPS is a steady-state average or includes warm-up.
  5. [Sec. 4.2] Equation (3) introduces hyperparameters w_txt and w_src, but their values are never reported. Likewise, the history window size and the number of denoising steps at deployment are not given. Please report these values for reproducibility.
  6. [Sec. 7.2] For LongV2VBench, provide details on how the 229 tasks were sourced, how ground-truth editing targets (if any) were created, and the exact judge prompt and scoring aggregation. This is necessary for the benchmark to be usable by others.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: short-video results are externally grounded on OpenVE-Bench; claimed long-horizon benefits are not derived from the benchmark construction, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The core training objectives (Eq. 1-3) define SA-DMD as a modification of DMD with an extra source-anchored CFG term; the student is trained to match a source-sharpened teacher, and the reported quality is then measured by an external Gemini judge on OpenVE-Bench and by pairwise human preference, not by the training objective itself. LHAD is described as segmented per-clip backward passes with graph clearing; whether this truly accumulates the full-horizon gradient is a technical correctness question, but the text's own description does not define the target result in terms of the reported scores, so it is not a circular reduction. Self-citations (LongLive [33], JoyAI-Image [27]) are used for architectural inspiration and data provenance rather than as an unverified uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification of the central claim; the central real-time and short-video results are independently benchmarked. LongV2VBench is internally constructed and is also used for component ablations (Table 5), which weakens the independent support for the long-video and 'unbounded stream' claim; however, the benchmark is not an input to the model's derivation, and no quoted equation or construction makes the reported long-video performance equivalent to the benchmark's design. Therefore, under the quoted-reduction standard, no significant circularity is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central runtime and quality claims rest on a chain of unshipped training choices: CFG weights w_src and w_txt, window/chunk sizes, two-step count, mirror-loop extension, synthetic paired editing data, and the assumption that distillation bakes source fidelity into a single-branch generator. The invented-entity count is zero; no new physical or conceptual objects are postulated beyond the method components themselves.

free parameters (5)
  • w_src (source CFG guidance weight) = not specified
    Appears in Eq. 3 as the weight on the source-fidelity axis of the teacher; chosen by the authors and listed as a hyperparameter, but no value or selection rule is reported.
  • w_txt (text CFG guidance weight) = not specified
    Text-conditioning guidance weight in Eq. 3; jointly determines the distillation target with w_src; no value reported.
  • History window size (number of retained chunks) = not specified
    Controls the sliding temporal window per Sec. 4.1; central to the bounded-memory claim but no ablation or exact value given.
  • Deployment denoising steps = 2
    SA-DMD distills the teacher into a two-step generator; all latency and quality figures depend on this specific step count.
  • Mirror-loop extension = alternating forward and reversed sequences
    Used in LHAD to extend rollouts beyond source video length; not compared to other extension strategies.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Flow-matching objective with per-chunk noise levels (Eq. 1) is a valid training signal for causal chunk generation.
    Inherited from flow matching and Diffusion Forcing; the paper applies rather than proves it.
  • domain assumption Synthetic paired video data (keyframe-guided propagation and latent-shared I2V) approximates real-world editing distributions.
    Sec. 6 describes the pipeline but provides no downstream validation of the paired data beyond the model's own scores.
  • ad hoc to paper Bounded-window attention with a global first-chunk sink prevents quality degradation beyond one-minute streams.
    The paper claims open-ended stability by design, but only one-minute LongV2VBench clips are measured.
  • ad hoc to paper SA-DMD source-anchored teacher guidance is fully absorbed into the single-branch generator.
    Sec. 4.2 asserts the absorption; no analysis or ablation isolates whether the deployed model truly internalizes source anchoring.
  • domain assumption The MLLM condition tokens from the first frame plus current source chunk provide sufficient editing context with no future frames.
    Core to causal editing; stated in Sec. 3.1 and 4.1, not independently tested.
  • domain assumption FP8 quantization and operator fusion preserve editing quality.
    Sec. 5 applies reduced precision for the 30 FPS figure; no quantized-versus-full-precision quality comparison is reported.
  • domain assumption Gemini judge scores are a valid proxy for human preferences on the two benchmarks.
    Sec. 7.2 uses a Gemini multimodal judge without local calibration against the human evaluations.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of JoyAI-Video-Edit: Real-Time Open-Ended Video Editing with Autoregressive Diffusion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P3Z4H6OU

@misc{pith2026260803974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: JoyAI-Video-Edit: Real-Time Open-Ended Video Editing with Autoregressive Diffusion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P3Z4H6OU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.03974}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Real-time video editing requires low-latency causal generation with bounded computational resources while preserving source fidelity and long-term temporal consistency. We present JoyAI-Video-Edit, a 16B-parameter autoregressive diffusion framework for real-time, open-ended video editing without access to future frames or a predefined video duration. Our method combines chunk-wise autoregressive adaptation, Source-Anchored Distribution Matching Distillation (SA-DMD), and Long-Horizon Autoregressive Distillation to reduce train--inference mismatch, preserve source fidelity during two-step generation, and mitigate accumulated temporal drift. Extensive automatic and human evaluations show that JoyAI-Video-Edit substantially outperforms existing streaming editors and remains competitive with strong offline systems on both short and long videos. The complete system achieves end-to-end 720p video editing at approximately 30 FPS on a single Nvidia B200 GPU. Code is available at https://github.com/jd-opensource/JoyAI-Video-Edit.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Happyhorse 1.0.https://happy-horse.ai/docs/basic-usage, 2026

    Alibaba ATH Team. Happyhorse 1.0.https://happy-horse.ai/docs/basic-usage, 2026. Accessed: 2026-07-28

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    L., Ma, S., Zeng, Y., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Shen, Y., and Chen, Q

    Bai, Q., Wang, Q., Ouyang, H., Yu, Y., Wang, H., Wang, W., Cheng, K. L., Ma, S., Zeng, Y., Liu, Z., Xu, Y., Shen, Y., and Chen, Q. Scaling instruction-based video editing with a high-quality synthetic dataset. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 37971–37981, 2026

    work page 2026

  3. [3]

    Bernini: Latent Semantic Planning for Video Diffusion

    Bernini Team. Bernini: Latent semantic planning for video diffusion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.22344, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Seedance 2.0: Advancing video generation for world complexity.arXiv preprintarXiv:2604.14148, 2026

    ByteDance Seed. Seedance 2.0: Advancing video generation for world complexity.arXiv preprintarXiv:2604.14148, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  5. [5]

    Diffusion forcing: Next-token prediction meets full-sequence diffusion.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:24081–24125, 2024

    Chen, B., Martí Monsó, D., Du, Y., Simchowitz, M., Tedrake, R., and Sitzmann, V. Diffusion forcing: Next-token prediction meets full-sequence diffusion.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:24081–24125, 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Skyreels-v2: Infinite-length film generative model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13074, 2025

    Chen, G., Lin, D., Yang, J., Lin, C., Zhu, J., Fan, M., Zhang, H., Chen, S., Chen, Z., Ma, C., et al. Skyreels-v2: Infinite-length film generative model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13074, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    Vino: A unified visual generator with interleaved omnimodal context

    Chen, J., He, T., Fu, Z., Wan, P., Gai, K., and Ye, W. Vino: A unified visual generator with interleaved omnimodal context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02358, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Longlive-2.0: An nvfp4 parallel infrastructure for long video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.18739, 2026

    Chen, Y., Wang, L., Huang, W., Yang, S., Zhang, B., Xiao, Y., Chu, R., Mao, W., Hu, Q., Liu, S., et al. Longlive-2.0: An nvfp4 parallel infrastructure for long video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.18739, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    Lucy edit: Open-weight text-guided video editing

    DecartAI Team. Lucy edit: Open-weight text-guided video editing. Technical report, DecartAI, 2025. URL https://d2drjpuinn46lb.cloudfront.net/Lucy_Edit__High_Fidelity_Text_Guided_Video_Editing.pdf

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    Streamdiffusionv2: A streaming system for dynamic and interactive video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07399, 2025

    Feng, T., Li, Z., Yang, S., Xi, H., Li, M., Li, X., Zhang, L., Yang, K., Peng, K., Han, S., et al. Streamdiffusionv2: A streaming system for dynamic and interactive video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07399, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    End-to-end training for autoregressive video diffusion via self-resampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15702, 2025

    Guo, Y., Yang, C., He, H., Zhao, Y., Wei, M., Yang, Z., Huang, W., and Lin, D. End-to-end training for autoregressive video diffusion via self-resampling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15702, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Openve-3m: A large-scale high-quality dataset for instruction-guided video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07826, 2025

    He, H., Wang, J., Zhang, J., Xue, Z., Bu, X., Yang, Q., Wen, S., and Xie, L. Openve-3m: A large-scale high-quality dataset for instruction-guided video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.07826, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Streamingt2v: Consistent, dynamic, and extendable long video generation from text

    Henschel, R., Khachatryan, L., Poghosyan, H., Hayrapetyan, D., Tadevosyan, V., Wang, Z., Navasardyan, S., and Shi, H. Streamingt2v: Consistent, dynamic, and extendable long video generation from text. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pp. 2568–2577, 2025

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Self forcing: Bridging the train-test gap in autoregressive video diffusion

    Huang, X., Li, Z., He, G., Zhou, M., and Shechtman, E. Self forcing: Bridging the train-test gap in autoregressive video diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08009, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing

    Jiang, Z., Han, Z., Mao, C., Zhang, J., Pan, Y., and Liu, Y. Vace: All-in-one video creation and editing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 17191–17202, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Kling o1 launches as the world’s first unified multi- modal video model

    Kuaishou Technology. Kling o1 launches as the world’s first unified multi- modal video model. https://ir.kuaishou.com/news-releases/news-release-details/ kling-o1-launches-worlds-first-unified-multimodal-video-model-0/, 2025. Accessed: 2026-08-03

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Kling ai 3.0 and video 3.0 omni

    Kuaishou Technology. Kling ai 3.0 and video 3.0 omni. https://ir.kuaishou.com/news-releases/ news-release-details/kling-ai-launches-30-model-ushering-era-where-everyone-can-be , 2026. Ac- cessed: 2026-07-28

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    HP-Edit: A human-preference post-training framework for image editing

    Li, F., Wang, C., Lei, L., Qiu, Y., Xu, J., Jiang, J., Qin, X., Chen, Z., Song, F., Wang, Z., Pei, R., and Zuo, W. HP-Edit: A human-preference post-training framework for image editing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 43113–43123, 2026

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    In-context learning with unpaired clips for instruction-based video editing

    Liao, X., Zeng, X., Song, Z., Fu, Z., Yu, G., and Lin, G. In-context learning with unpaired clips for instruction-based video editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.14648, 2025

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Lin, Y., Liang, G., Zeng, Z., Bai, Z., Chen, Y., and Shou, M. Z. Kiwi-edit: Versatile video editing via instruction and reference guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.02175, 2026. 17

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Omniweaving: Towards unified video generation with free-form composition and reasoning

    Pan, K., Tian, Q., Zhang, J., Kong, W., Xiong, J., Long, Y., Zhang, S., Qiu, H., Wang, T., Lv, Z., Wu, Y., Bo, L., Tang, S., and Zhong, Z. Omniweaving: Towards unified video generation with free-form composition and reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.24458, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  22. [22]

    Pixverse launches v6, advancing ai video generation across creative and agentic workflows.https: //pixverse.ai/en/blog/pixverse-launches-v6-advancing-ai-video-generation , 2026

    PixVerse. Pixverse launches v6, advancing ai video generation across creative and agentic workflows.https: //pixverse.ai/en/blog/pixverse-launches-v6-advancing-ai-video-generation , 2026. Accessed: 2026-08- 03

    work page 2026

  23. [23]

    Fatezero: Fusing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing

    Qi, C., Cun, X., Zhang, Y., Lei, C., Wang, X., Shan, Y., and Chen, Q. Fatezero: Fusing attentions for zero-shot text-based video editing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 15932–15942, 2023

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    CamEdit: Continuous camera parameter control for photorealistic image editing

    Qin, X., Wang, Z., Li, F., Chen, H., Pei, R., Li, W., and Cao, X. CamEdit: Continuous camera parameter control for photorealistic image editing. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 38, pp. 114152–114171, 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Turbo2K: Towards ultra-efficient and high-quality 2K video synthesis

    Ren, J., Li, W., Wang, Z., Sun, H., Liu, B., Chen, H., Xu, J., Li, A., Zhang, S., Shao, B., Guo, Y., and Zhu, L. Turbo2K: Towards ultra-efficient and high-quality 2K video synthesis. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 18155–18165, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Runway aleph: A new way to edit, transform and generate video.https://runwayml.com/research/ introducing-runway-aleph, 2025

    Runway. Runway aleph: A new way to edit, transform and generate video.https://runwayml.com/research/ introducing-runway-aleph, 2025

    work page 2025

  27. [27]

    Awaking spatial intelligence in unified multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.04128, 2026

    Song, L., Li, W., Ma, G., Tang, W., Wang, B., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Xiao, Y., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Zhang, W., Xu, H., Jiang, N., Han, X., Sun, H., Zhang, M., Huang, H., and Duan, N. Awaking spatial intelligence in unified multimodal understanding and generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.04128, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Magi-1: Autoregressive video generation at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13211, 2025

    Teng, H., Jia, H., Sun, L., Li, L., Li, M., Tang, M., Han, S., Zhang, T., Zhang, W., Luo, W., et al. Magi-1: Autoregressive video generation at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13211, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Liveedit: Towards real-time diffusion-based streaming video editing

    Wang, X., Zhao, C., Zhan, F., and Ma, Y. Liveedit: Towards real-time diffusion-based streaming video editing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.26740, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Univideo: Unified understanding, generation, and editing for videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08377, 2025

    Wei, C., Liu, Q., Ye, Z., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Wan, P., Gai, K., and Chen, W. Univideo: Unified understanding, generation, and editing for videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08377, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    YOSE: You only select essential tokens for efficient DiT-based video object removal

    Wu, C., Lei, L., Li, F., Guo, C., Kong, D., Qin, X., Wang, Z., Cheng, M., and Li, C. YOSE: You only select essential tokens for efficient DiT-based video object removal. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 32926–32935, 2026

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Xmax x2.0: Real-time interactive video model.https://xmax.ai/, 2026

    Xmax AI. Xmax x2.0: Real-time interactive video model.https://xmax.ai/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-07-28

    work page 2026

  33. [33]

    Longlive: Real-time interactive long video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22622, 2025

    Yang, S., Huang, W., Chu, R., Xiao, Y., Zhao, Y., Wang, X., Li, M., Xie, E., Chen, Y., Lu, Y., et al. Longlive: Real-time interactive long video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.22622, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Unic: Unified in-context video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04216, 2025

    Ye, Z., He, X., Liu, Q., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Wan, P., Zhang, D., Gai, K., Chen, Q., and Luo, W. Unic: Unified in-context video editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.04216, 2025

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Improved distribution matching distillation for fast image synthesis.Advancesin neural information processing systems, 37:47455–47487, 2024

    Yin, T., Gharbi, M., Park, T., Zhang, R., Shechtman, E., Durand, F., and Freeman, B. Improved distribution matching distillation for fast image synthesis.Advancesin neural information processing systems, 37:47455–47487, 2024

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    T., Durand, F., Shechtman, E., and Huang, X

    Yin, T., Zhang, Q., Zhang, R., Freeman, W. T., Durand, F., Shechtman, E., and Huang, X. From slow bidirectional to fast autoregressive video diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 22963–22974, 2025

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    Helios: Real real-time long video generation model

    Yuan, S., Yin, Y., Li, Z., Huang, X., Yang, X., and Yuan, L. Helios: Real real-time long video generation model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.04379, 2026

    arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Vidu S1: A Real-Time Interactive Video Generation Model

    Zhang, J., Jiang, K., Chen, J., Wang, X., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, D., Li, J., Ye, C., Chen, M., Zhu, H., Zhao, M., Jiang, Y., Huang, Z., Xiang, C., Zheng, K., Wang, H., Wang, X., Jia, Q., Chen, X., Chen, Y., Jiang, Y., Fu, F., Deng, Z., Bao, F., Chen, J., and Zhu, J. Vidu s1: A real-time interactive video generation model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.03118, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  39. [39]

    SANA-Streaming: Real-time Streaming Video Editing with Hybrid Diffusion Transformer

    Zhao, Y., Pan, Y., He, Q., Yu, J., Chen, J., Ye, T., Liu, H., Xie, E., and Han, S. Sana-streaming: Real-time streaming video editing with hybrid diffusion transformer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.30409, 2026. 18

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Causal forcing: Autoregressive diffusion distillation done right for high-quality real-time interactive video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02214, 2026

    Zhu, H., Zhao, M., He, G., Su, H., Li, C., and Zhu, J. Causal forcing: Autoregressive diffusion distillation done right for high-quality real-time interactive video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.02214, 2026. 19

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.