Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 92 references

Ghost-RISB for Correlated Electron-Phonon Systems: Application to the Hubbard-Holstein Model

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Ghost-RISB matches DMFT for electrons plus phonons at a fraction of the cost.

desk verdict A real method extension with convincing normal-state benchmarks, but the headline superconducting mechanism is not yet backed by convergence checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04816 v1 pith:3RJ3B6WB submitted 2026-08-05 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con

Samuele Giuli , Ricardo J. Campos-Lopes , Emin Moghadas , Massimo Capone This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.supr-con
keywords ghost-RISBHubbard-Holsteinmodelelectron-phononcouplingslave-bosonmethodsdynamicalmean-fieldtheoryquasiparticleweightpolaroniccrossoverbipolaronicsuperconductivity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the ghost-RISB variational method—a slave-boson approach that adds auxiliary ghost orbitals to mimic dynamical self-energy effects—to systems where electrons are coupled to local phonons. Benchmarking on the Hubbard-Holstein model, it shows that with three to five ghost orbitals the method reproduces DMFT quasiparticle weights, mass renormalization, and phonon displacement distributions across a wide range of couplings, fillings, and phonon frequencies. It then uses the low-cost method to study strong-coupling, adiabatic-phonon superconductivity, where it finds that the superconducting order parameter is bounded by the overlap of the phonon wavefunctions attached to empty and doubly occupied sites, and that this overlap collapses as bipolarons form. The paper presents this Franck-Condon-like reduction of doublon-holon coherence as the mechanism behind the suppression of superconductivity in the bipolaronic regime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electron-phonon ghost-RISB embedding: a local impurity problem whose slave-boson amplitudes carry both electronic and phononic quantum numbers, so the phonon mode enters the variational state directly rather than through a perturbative or static renormalization. The identity that carries the mechanism argument is Eq. (38), $|\Delta| \le I_{dh} = \int dx \sqrt{P_0(x)} \sqrt{P_2(x)}$, an upper bound on the s-wave superconducting order parameter expressed as the overlap (Bhattacharyya coefficient) of the square roots of the charge-resolved phonon displacement distributions for empty and doubly occupied sites. This bound converts an abstract many-body cancellation into a directly computable phonon quantity: when bipolarons form and $P_0$ and $P_2$ separate, $I_{dh}$ drops and drags the order parameter down with it. The ghost orbitals themselves do the work of reproducing the dynamical self-energy through the analytical expression Eq. (33), which is what makes the quasiparticle-weight benchmarks pass.

What would settle it

Perform a numerically exact calculation (for example, DMFT with a substantially larger bath than $B=5$ and more than 40 phonon states) of the superconducting order parameter and of the charge-resolved phonon PDFs for the Hubbard-Holstein model at $U/D=1$, $\omega_0/D=0.5$, $n=0.5$ for $\lambda/D$ between 1.0 and 2.5; if the exact $|\Delta|$ does not fall when $I_{dh}$ falls, or if ghost-RISB with $B=3$ to $5$ disagrees with the exact values, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that ghost-RISB remains reliable when local phonons are encoded directly into the slave-boson fields: the embedding Hamiltonian solved by exact diagonalization contains the full local electron-electron, electron-phonon, and phonon terms, and the ghost orbitals supply the frequency structure of the self-energy that static slave-boson methods miss. Benchmark comparisons show that $B=3$ to $5$ ghost orbitals already give DMFT-level results for quasiparticle weights and phonon probability distributions, including the polaronic crossover, while $B=1$ (standard RISB) fails in the adiabatic regime. In the superconducting phase, the paper proves the bound $|\Delta| \le I_{dh} = \int dx \sqrt{P_0(x)} \sqrt{P_2(x)}$, where $P_0$ and $P_2$ are the phonon displacement distributions on empty and doubly occupied sites, and demonstrates numerically that $I_{dh}$ tracks the order parameter and falls when the phonon distribution becomes bimodal. The authors interpret this as a phonon-induced orthogonality between holon and doublon sectors—a Franck-Condon effect—that suppresses superconducting coherence even while local pairing remains large.

Load-bearing premise

The method's accuracy rests on the assumption that a few ghost orbitals and a phonon Hilbert space truncated to about 40 states capture the full dynamical effect of the lattice on the electrons, especially in the strong-coupling adiabatic and superconducting regimes where the paper does not show a direct comparison with a more exact method.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With $B=5$ ghost orbitals, ghost-RISB reproduces DMFT quasiparticle weights and mass renormalizations for the Hubbard-Holstein model, so correlated electron-phonon phase diagrams can be scanned at a fraction of DMFT's cost.
  • The $B=1$ static slave-boson limit misses the polaronic crossover in the presence of electron-electron repulsion, so a truly dynamical treatment of phonons—here supplied by ghost orbitals—is required in the adiabatic regime.
  • Because the self-consistency uses static observables, the method avoids DMFT's expensive dynamical self-consistency and can reach strong-coupling, low-phonon-frequency parameters where DMFT becomes unfeasible.
  • Equation (38) makes the suppression of superconductivity in the bipolaronic regime a quantitative statement about phonon wavefunction overlap, not just about mass renormalization or the effective pairing interaction.
  • In the doped, more adiabatic case the bound drops faster, producing a sharper suppression of the order parameter even though local double occupations remain numerous.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bound $|\Delta| \le I_{dh}$ is derived from the embedding ground state and does not rely on half-filling or on $U=0$, so it should hold in any local-pairing model; computing $I_{dh}$ from charge-resolved phonon PDFs is therefore a cheap general diagnostic for bipolaronic suppression of pairing coherence.
  • If the Franck-Condon picture is right, increasing the phonon frequency (or otherwise stiffening the lattice) should keep $P_0$ and $P_2$ overlapping and restore superconducting coherence at fixed local pairing—a specific prediction the paper does not make.
  • The same encoding of phonons inside the slave-boson fields generalizes to several local phonon modes and multiorbital impurities, so the method should be directly applicable to realistic materials where a full dynamical impurity solver is too costly; this is a natural but unproven next step.
  • The overlap bound might also constrain other off-diagonal orders, such as charge-density-wave or excitonic condensates, whenever the order parameter connects two phonon-dressed charge sectors; whether it is tight in those cases is unexplored.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper generalizes the ghost-RISB (ghost-Gutzwiller) formalism to include local dispersionless phonons coupled to arbitrary on-site electronic operators, encoding the phonons in the slave-boson amplitudes. It applies the method to the Hubbard-Holstein model on the Bethe lattice, benchmarking electron quasiparticle weights, mass renormalization, and phonon probability distribution functions against published DMFT data (Figs. 1-4). It then studies s-wave superconductivity in the strong-coupling adiabatic regime (Figs. 5-6), reporting a drop of the order parameter Δ that is interpreted via the inequality |Δ| ≤ I_dh, where I_dh is the overlap of the charge-resolved phonon distributions in the holon and doublon sectors (Eq. (38), Appendix B). The paper identifies a Franck-Condon-like suppression of doublon-holon coherence as the mechanism for this drop.

Significance. If the convergence of the superconducting-state calculations can be established, the approach would provide an efficient, variational, and nonperturbative tool for correlated electron-phonon systems, and Eq. (38) would be a clean, parameter-free relation connecting a phononic observable to the pairing amplitude. The manuscript's strengths include the absence of parameters fitted to the DMFT benchmarks, the use of external DMFT data in the normal state, and the explicit inequality derived in Appendix B. The main open questions are whether the finite ghost-orbital and finite-phonon-basis calculations in the bipolaronic superconducting regime are converged and whether the analytical self-energy expression imported from Ref. [60] remains valid when phonons are encoded in the slave-boson fields.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III.B, Figs. 5 and 6] The central new result, the Franck-Condon mechanism for the suppression of Δ, is based on B=1 and B=3 calculations with the phonon Hilbert space truncated to 40 states; no convergence study with respect to B or the phonon cutoff is reported for these parameters. The authors' own caveat after Fig. 5 ('further investigations of various symmetry breakings are in order') indicates this is a known gap. Please add B=5 (and if possible B=7) and larger phonon cutoffs for the parameter sets of Figs. 5 and 6, and ideally an independent DMFT or other benchmark in the bipolaronic regime. Without this, the drop in Δ and I_dh could be a truncation artifact.
  2. [Section II and Section III.A, Eq. (33)] The analytical self-energy expression is imported from Ref. [60], which is a purely electronic ghost-RISB result. Its use here assumes that the form remains valid when phonons are encoded in the slave-boson fields and enter the embedding Hamiltonian. Since the quasiparticle-weight benchmarks in Figs. 1 and 2 rely on Eq. (33), this assumption is load-bearing. Please provide a derivation or explicit justification of Eq. (33) in the electron-phonon setting.
  3. [Appendix B and Section III.B] Appendix B proves only the inequality |Δ| ≤ I_dh; the claim that the suppression of Δ is caused by the drop of I_dh requires more than a coincident decrease of an upper bound. The argument would be conclusive if the ratio |Δ|/I_dh were shown to remain nearly constant before the bipolaronic crossover and to drop only there, or if an additional wavefunction diagnostic directly isolated the doublon-holon coherence. As written, the tracking is suggestive but does not uniquely identify the mechanism.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 6] The caption of Fig. 6 states ω0/D=1.0, while the text in Section III.B states ω0/D=0.5 for the same calculation; please reconcile this discrepancy.
  2. [Section III] The paper states that the phonon Hilbert space is 'typically' truncated to 40 states, but it does not state the cutoff used in each figure or report a convergence test in the normal state; please specify the values and any convergence checks.
  3. [Abstract and Conclusions] The abstract and conclusions claim a 'fraction of the computational cost' of DMFT, but no runtime or scaling data are reported; a quantitative comparison would make the practical claim concrete.
  4. [Section II] The formula 'M=M/2(B−1)' reuses the symbol M on both sides and is difficult to parse; please use a distinct notation for the two quantities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: benchmarks are external DMFT data and the central bound is a parameter-free Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.

full rationale

The paper's accuracy claims are benchmarked against DMFT data from Refs. [29,30,69,72], which are external references; no parameter is fitted to those DMFT curves and then reported as a prediction. The mass-renormalization and phonon-PDF comparisons in Figs. 1-4 are direct external cross-checks. The analytical self-energy expression Eq. (33) is imported from Ref. [60], a preprint by the same first author, but it is parameter-free and its numerical output is independently validated against DMFT, so this self-citation is not load-bearing in a circular sense. The central new result, Eq. (38) |Δ| ≤ I_dh = ∫ dx sqrt(P0(x)) sqrt(P2(x)), is derived in Appendix B from the triangle and Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities applied to a generic embedding ground state; it does not assume the ghost-RISB equations or any fitted quantity and holds for any wavefunction. The observed simultaneous drop of Δ and I_dh in Figs. 5-6 is a physical observation about the same embedding state, not an identity imposed by construction; the inequality alone does not force the drop, so the Franck-Condon mechanism claim has independent content. The authors' own caveat that 'further investigations of various symmetry breakings are in order' and the lack of convergence checks in the superconducting regime are numerical/convergence risks, not circularity. No step reduces its conclusion to its own input by definition, by fitted parameter, or by a self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central calculation rests on a mean-field variational ansatz, finite ghost orbitals, a truncated phonon basis, and an embedding mapping borrowed from prior ghost-RISB work. The free parameters are convergence parameters (B, N_ph) rather than quantities fitted to DMFT. The main paper-specific axiom is the transfer of the analytical self-energy formula from Ref. [60] to the electron-phonon case. No new physical entity with experimental consequences is introduced; the ghost orbitals are computational devices.

free parameters (2)
  • Number of ghost orbitals B = B = 1, 3, 5
    Convergence parameter that controls how much dynamical structure of the self-energy can be represented; chosen by hand, not fitted to data. B=1 is standard RISB, B=3/5 are the ghost extensions used for benchmarks.
  • Phonon Hilbert-space truncation N_ph = 40 states per site
    All impurity exact-diagonalization solves truncate the local phonon basis to 40 states; no convergence check is reported for the strong-coupling adiabatic or superconducting points.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Variational product ansatz |Psi> = |psi0> x |phi> (Eq. 25) decouples auxiliary fermions and slave bosons at mean-field level.
    This is the ghost-RISB mean-field approximation; it is not exact for finite B, and its accuracy in the phonon-strong-coupling regime is assumed.
  • standard math The embedding mapping of the phonon-extended slave-boson saddle point to an impurity model is valid, including phonon degrees of freedom in the impurity Hamiltonian.
    The paper follows Refs [42,65] and states the mapping; the phonon extension is asserted rather than fully re-derived.
  • domain assumption Infinite-dimensional Bethe lattice with semicircular DOS is an adequate testbed, and DMFT data from Refs [29,30,69,72] are accurate and comparable.
    The benchmarks rely on published DMFT curves extracted from figures; differences in bath discretization are not quantified.
  • ad hoc to paper Analytical self-energy expression Eq. (33) carries over from Ref. [60] to the electron-phonon case.
    No derivation is given inside this paper for the phonon-extended formalism; the validity of this transfer is load-bearing for the quasiparticle weight benchmarks.
invented entities (1)
  • Ghost auxiliary fermionic orbitals
    purpose: Enlarge the variational space so the static slave-boson saddle point can mimic the frequency-dependent self-energy of DMFT.
    The ghosts are computational constructs with no direct experimental handle; their validity is supported only indirectly by benchmark agreement with DMFT.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ghost-RISB for Correlated Electron-Phonon Systems: Application to the Hubbard-Holstein Model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3RJ3B6WB

@misc{pith2026260804816,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ghost-RISB for Correlated Electron-Phonon Systems: Application to the Hubbard-Holstein Model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3RJ3B6WB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04816}
}
read the original abstract

We develop a generalization of the ghost-rotationally-invariant slave-boson (ghost-RISB) method that incorporates local phonon modes coupled to arbitrary on-site electronic degrees of freedom, enabling a nonperturbative treatment of electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions within an efficient variational framework. The method extends the ghost-orbital construction to capture dynamical self-energy effects and phonon-induced renormalizations beyond static slave-boson approaches. Benchmarking against dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) results for the Hubbard-Holstein model, we find excellent quantitative agreement for electron quasiparticle weights and phonon properties across a wide range of coupling strengths, and it captures accurately the competition between electron-electron and electron-phonon interactions. We show that the inclusion of the ghost orbitals is crucial to accurately describe the regime of low-frequency, strongly dynamical, phonons. The extended ghost-RISB achieves this accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost of DMFT, due to its self-consistency rooted in static observables instead of dynamical ones, enabling rapid exploration of correlated electron-phonon phase diagrams. We exploit this advantage to characterize the most demanding regime of strong coupling and adiabatic phonons. Our analysis shows a suppression of the superconducting order parameter, which is interpreted as a Franck-Condon-like reduction of the overlap between the phonon wavefunctions associated with empty and doubly-occupied sites in the bipolaronic regime.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04816 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Effect of electron-phonon interaction on the quasi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Mass renormalisation as a function of the phonon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Phonon probability distribution functions for dif [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Total and charge-resolved phonon probability dis [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Holstein model (U/D = 0 and ω0/D = 1.0) plot of (a) superconducting order parameter (black) and double￾holon overlap Idh (red) for B = 1 (dots) and B = 3 (line) and as a function of the effective attraction λ. In green the area at which we identify the polaronic crosso…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Hubbard-Holstein model (U/D = 1.0 and ω0/D = 1.0) plot of (a) superconductive order parameter (black) and double-holon overlap Idh (red) for B = 1 (dots) and B = 3 (line) and as a function of the effective attraction λ. In green the area at which we identify the polaro…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [60]

    Mejuto-Zaera and M

    C. Mejuto-Zaera and M. Fabrizio, Ghost embedding bridging chemistry and one-body theories, The Journal of Chemical Physics164, 224125 (2026)

    work page 2026

  2. [1]

    We start from a guess for matricesΛandR

  3. [2]

    (28) and the new∆ ab = ⟨f † afb⟩

    We solve the auxiliary fermionic problem and com- pute the newVfrom Eq. (28) and the new∆ ab = ⟨f † afb⟩. 6

  4. [3]

    We compute the newΛc from Eq. (31)

  5. [4]

    27, that is realizing the saddle point of theΦfields

    We solve the impurity problem associated to the embedding Hamiltonian at eq. 27, that is realizing the saddle point of theΦfields

  6. [5]

    We update∆ab =⟨ ˜fa ˜f † b ⟩

  7. [6]

    (30) and (31)

    We computeRandΛrespectively from Eq. (30) and (31)

  8. [7]

    We solve the embedding Hamiltonian at eq

    We check the convergence ofΛandRwith the old parameter; if not converged, we go back to the point 2. We solve the embedding Hamiltonian at eq. (27) with exact diagonalization. We typically truncate the phononic Hilbert space to 40 states. III. RESUL TS In this section, we will present some results to assess the accuracy and computational feasibility of gh...

    2022

Show all 92 references
  1. [8]

    D. J. Abramovitch, J. Mravlje, J.-J. Zhou, A. Georges, and M. Bernardi, Respective roles of electron-phonon and electron-electron interactions in the transport and quasi- particle properties ofsrvo3, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 186501 (2024)

    2024

  2. [9]

    Mirjolet, F

    M. Mirjolet, F. Rivadulla, P. Marsik, V. Borisov, R. Va- lentí, and J. Fontcuberta, Electron–phonon coupling and electron–phonon scattering insrvo3, Advanced Science8, 2004207 (2021)

    2021

  3. [10]

    Coulter, F

    J. Coulter, F. B. Kugler, H. LaBollita, A. Georges, and C. E. Dreyer, Electron-phonon origins of unconventional resistivity in moderately correlated perovskite oxides, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 216301 (2026)

    2026

  4. [11]

    Verdi, F

    C. Verdi, F. Caruso, and F. Giustino, Origin of the crossover from polarons to fermi liquids in transition metal oxides, Nature Communications8, 15769 (2017)

    2017

  5. [12]

    Reticcioli, U

    M. Reticcioli, U. Diebold, G. Kresse, and C. Franchini, Small polarons in transition metal oxides, inHandbook of Materials Modeling: Applications: Current and Emerging Materials, edited by W. Andreoni and S. Yip (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019) pp. 1–39

    2019

  6. [13]

    D. J. Abramovitch, J. Coulter, S. Beck, and A. Millis, Electron-phonon coupling in correlated metals: A dynam- ical mean-field theory study, Phys. Rev. B112, 075113 (2025)

    2025

  7. [14]

    Gunnarsson, Superconductivity in fullerides, Rev

    O. Gunnarsson, Superconductivity in fullerides, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 575 (1997). 13

    1997

  8. [15]

    J. E. Han, E. Koch, and O. Gunnarsson, Metal-insulator transitions: Influence of lattice structure, jahn-teller ef- fect, and hund’s rule coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1276 (2000)

    2000

  9. [16]

    Capone, M

    M. Capone, M. Fabrizio, C. Castellani, and E. Tosatti, Strongly correlated su- perconductivity, Science296, 2364 (2002), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1071122

    2002 doi

  10. [17]

    Capone, M

    M. Capone, M. Fabrizio, C. Castellani, and E. Tosatti, Colloquium: Modeling the unconventional superconduct- ing properties of expandedA 3c60 fullerides, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 943 (2009)

    2009

  11. [18]

    Faber, J

    C. Faber, J. L. Janssen, M. Côté, E. Runge, and X. Blase, Electron-phonon coupling in the c60 fullerene within the many-bodygwapproach,Phys.Rev.B84,155104(2011)

    2011

  12. [19]

    Nomura, S

    Y. Nomura, S. Sakai, M. Capone, and R. Arita, Unified understanding of superconductivity and mott transition in alkali-doped fullerides from first principles, Science Advances1, e1500568 (2015), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/sciadv.1500568

    2015 doi

  13. [20]

    H. Yan, J. M. Bok, J. He, W. Zhang, Q. Gao, X. Luo, Y. Cai, Y. Peng, J. Meng, C. Li, H. Chen, C. Song, C. Yin, T. Miao, Y. Chen, G. Gu, C. Lin, F. Zhang, F. Yang, S. Zhang, Q. Peng, G. Liu, L. Zhao, H.-Y. Choi, Z. Xu, and X. J. Zhou, Ubiquitous co- existing electron-mode coupl...

    2023 doi

  14. [21]

    Braicovich, M

    L. Braicovich, M. Rossi, R. Fumagalli, Y. Peng, Y. Wang, R. Arpaia, D. Betto, G. M. De Luca, D. Di Castro, K. Kummer, M. Moretti Sala, M. Pagetti, G. Balestrino, N. B. Brookes, M. Salluzzo, S. Johnston, J. van den Brink, and G. Ghiringhelli, Determining the electron- phonon co...

    2020

  15. [22]

    Gunnarsson and O

    O. Gunnarsson and O. Rösch, Interplay between elec- tron–phonon and coulomb interactions in cuprates, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 043201 (2008)

    2008

  16. [23]

    Capone, C

    M. Capone, C. Castellani, and M. Grilli, Electron-phonon interaction in strongly correlated systems, Advances in Condensed Matter Physics2010, 920860 (2010)

    2010

  17. [24]

    Grilli and C

    M. Grilli and C. Castellani, Electron-phonon interactions in the presence of strong correlations, Phys. Rev. B50, 16880 (1994)

    1994

  18. [25]

    Karakuzu, A

    S. Karakuzu, A. T. Ly, P. Mai, J. Neuhaus, T. A. Maier, and S. Johnston, Stripe correlations in the two- dimensional hubbard-holstein model, Communications Physics5, 311 (2022)

    2022

  19. [26]

    Z. Han, S. A. Kivelson, and H. Yao, Strong coupling limit of the holstein-hubbard model, Physical Review Letters 125, 167001 (2020)

    2020

  20. [27]

    Ohgoe and M

    T. Ohgoe and M. Imada, Competition among supercon- ducting, antiferromagnetic, and charge orders with inter- vention by phase separation in the 2d holstein-hubbard model, Physical Review Letters119, 197001 (2017)

    2017

  21. [28]

    Johnston, E

    S. Johnston, E. A. Nowadnick, Y.-F. Kung, B. Moritz, R. T. Scalettar, and T. P. Devereaux, Determinant quan- tum monte carlo study of thetwo-dimensional single-band hubbard-holstein model, Physical Review B87, 235133 (2013)

    2013

  22. [29]

    N. C. Costa, K. Seki, S. Yunoki, and S. Sorella, Phase diagram of the two-dimensional hubbard-holstein model, Communications Physics3, 80 (2020)

    2020

  23. [30]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

    1996

  24. [31]

    J. K. Freericks and M. Jarrell, Competition between electron-phonon attraction and weak coulomb repulsion, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2570 (1995)

    1995

  25. [32]

    Koller, D

    W. Koller, D. Meyer, Y. ¯Ono, and A. C. Hewson, First- and second-order phase transitions in the holstein- hubbard model, Europhysics Letters66, 559 (2004)

    2004

  26. [33]

    G. S. Jeon, T.-H. Park, J. H. Han, H. C. Lee, and H.- Y. Choi, Dynamical mean-field theory of the hubbard- holstein model at half filling: Zero temperature metal- insulator and insulator-insulator transitions, Phys. Rev. B70, 125114 (2004)

    2004

  27. [34]

    Capone, G

    M. Capone, G. Sangiovanni, C. Castellani, C. Di Castro, and M. Grilli, Phase separation close to the density-driven motttransitioninthehubbard-holsteinmodel,Phys.Rev. Lett.92, 106401 (2004)

    2004

  28. [35]

    Werner and A

    P. Werner and A. J. Millis, Efficient dynamical mean fieldsimulationoftheholstein-hubbardmodel,Phys.Rev. Lett.99, 146404 (2007)

    2007

  29. [36]

    Sangiovanni, M

    G. Sangiovanni, M. Capone, C. Castellani, and M. Grilli, Electron-phonon interaction close to a mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 026401 (2005)

    2005

  30. [37]

    Sangiovanni, M

    G. Sangiovanni, M. Capone, and C. Castellani, Relevance of phonon dynamics in strongly correlated systems cou- pled to phonons: Dynamical mean-field theory analysis, Phys. Rev. B73, 165123 (2006)

    2006

  31. [38]

    P. Paci, M. Capone, E. Cappelluti, S. Ciuchi, and C.Grimaldi,Isotopeeffectsinthehubbard-holsteinmodel within dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B74, 205108 (2006)

    2006

  32. [39]

    Bauer, Competing interactions and symmetry breaking in the hubbard-holstein model, Europhysics Letters90, 27002 (2010)

    J. Bauer, Competing interactions and symmetry breaking in the hubbard-holstein model, Europhysics Letters90, 27002 (2010)

    2010

  33. [40]

    Sangiovanni, O

    G. Sangiovanni, O. Gunnarsson, E. Koch, C. Castellani, and M. Capone, Electron-phonon interaction and anti- ferromagnetic correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 046404 (2006)

    2006

  34. [41]

    Moghadas, M

    E. Moghadas, M. Reitner, T. Wehling, G. Sangiovanni, S. Ciuchi, and A. Toschi, Effective enhancement of the electron-phonon coupling driven by nonperturbative elec- tronic density fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 126502 (2026)

    2026

  35. [42]

    Coulter and A

    J. Coulter and A. J. Millis, Electron-phonon coupling in correlated materials: Insights from the hubbard-holstein model, Phys. Rev. B113, 165145 (2026). 14

    2026

  36. [43]

    Coleman, New approach to the mixed-valence problem, Phys

    P. Coleman, New approach to the mixed-valence problem, Phys. Rev. B29, 3035 (1984)

    1984

  37. [44]

    Kotliar and A

    G. Kotliar and A. E. Ruckenstein, New functional inte- gral approach to strongly correlated fermi systems: The gutzwiller approximation as a saddle point, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1362 (1986)

    1986

  38. [45]

    Lechermann, A

    F. Lechermann, A. Georges, G. Kotliar, and O. Parcollet, Rotationally invariant slave-boson formalism and momen- tum dependence of the quasiparticle weight, Phys. Rev. B76, 155102 (2007)

    2007

  39. [46]

    M. C. Gutzwiller, Correlation of electrons in a narrows band, Phys. Rev.137, A1726 (1965)

    1965

  40. [47]

    Isidori and M

    A. Isidori and M. Capone, Rotationally invariant slave bosons for strongly correlated superconductors, Phys. Rev. B80, 115120 (2009)

    2009

  41. [48]

    S. Smit, M. Bluschke, P. Moen, N. Heinsdorf, E. Za- vatti, G. Bellomia, S. Giuli, S. K. Y. Dufresne, C. T. Suen, V. Zimmermann, C. Au-Yeung, S. Zhdanovich, J. I. Dadap, M. Zonno, S. Gorovikov, H. Lee, C.-T. Kuo, J.-S. Lee, D. Song, S. Ishida, H. Eisaki, B. Keimer, M. Michiardi...

    2025 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Lanatà, Operatorial formulation of the ghost rota- tionally invariant slave-boson theory, Phys

    N. Lanatà, Operatorial formulation of the ghost rota- tionally invariant slave-boson theory, Phys. Rev. B105, 045111 (2022)

    2022

  43. [50]

    Lanatà, T.-H

    N. Lanatà, T.-H. Lee, Y.-X. Yao, and V. Dobrosavljević, Emergent bloch excitations in mott matter, Phys. Rev. B 96, 195126 (2017)

    2017

  44. [51]

    M. S. Frank, T.-H. Lee, G. Bhattacharyya, P. K. H. Tsang, V. L. Quito, V. Dobrosavljević, O. Christiansen, and N. Lanatà, Quantum embedding description of the anderson lattice model with the ghost gutzwiller approx- imation, Phys. Rev. B104, L081103 (2021)

    2021

  45. [52]

    T.-H. Lee, N. Lanatà, and G. Kotliar, Accuracy of ghost rotationally invariant slave-boson and dynamical mean field theory as a function of the impurity-model bath size, Phys. Rev. B107, L121104 (2023)

    2023

  46. [53]

    Mejuto-Zaera and M

    C. Mejuto-Zaera and M. Fabrizio, Efficient computational screening of strongly correlated materials: Multiorbital phenomenology within the ghost gutzwiller approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. B107, 235150 (2023)

    2023

  47. [54]

    Guerci, M

    D. Guerci, M. Capone, and N. Lanatà, Time-dependent ghost gutzwiller nonequilibrium dynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L032023 (2023)

    2023

  48. [55]

    Mejuto-Zaera, Quantum embedding for molecules us- ing auxiliary particles – the ghost gutzwiller ansatz, Fara- day Discuss.254, 653 (2024)

    C. Mejuto-Zaera, Quantum embedding for molecules us- ing auxiliary particles – the ghost gutzwiller ansatz, Fara- day Discuss.254, 653 (2024)

    2024

  49. [56]

    Guerci, M

    D. Guerci, M. Capone, and M. Fabrizio, Exciton mott transition revisited, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 054605 (2019)

    2019

  50. [57]

    Giuli, C

    S. Giuli, C. Mejuto-Zaera, and M. Capone, Alter- magnetism from interaction-driven itinerant magnetism, Phys. Rev. B111, L020401 (2025)

    2025

  51. [58]

    A. M. Tagliente, C. Mejuto-Zaera, and M. Fabrizio, Re- vealing spinons by proximity effect, Phys. Rev. B111, 125110 (2025)

    2025

  52. [59]

    Pasqua, A

    I. Pasqua, A. M. Tagliente, G. Bellomia, B. Monserrat, M. Fabrizio, and C. Mejuto-Zaera, Band-structure picture for topology in strongly correlated systems with the ghost gutzwiller ansatz, Phys. Rev. B113, 155133 (2026)

    2026

  53. [61]

    Kazemi-Moridani, S

    A. Kazemi-Moridani, S. Giuli, T.-H. Lee, A. M. S. Trem- blay, M. Côté, N. Lanatà, and O. Gingras, Magnetic phases of the anisotropic triangular hubbard model from the ghost-gutzwiller approximation in the rotating spin- frame (2026), arXiv:2604.24848 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Bellomia, A

    G. Bellomia, A. Amaricci, and M. Capone, Local clas- sical correlations between physical electrons in hubbard systems, Phys. Rev. B113, 155158 (2026)

    2026

  55. [63]

    Pasqua, C

    I. Pasqua, C. Mejuto-Zaera, and M. Fabrizio, Fractional- ized fermi liquids with the ghost-gutzwiller ansatz (2026), arXiv:2607.12410 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026 arXiv

  56. [64]

    A. M. Tagliente, I. Pasqua, and M. Fabrizio, Direct minimization versus iterative embedding in the ghost- gutzwiller method: a comparative study of magnetism in mott insulators (2026), arXiv:2607.27156 [cond-mat.str- el]

    2026 arXiv

  57. [65]

    M. S. Frank, D. G. Artiukhin, T.-H. Lee, Y. Yao, K. Bar- ros, O. Christiansen, and N. Lanatà, Active learning ap- proach to simulations of strongly correlated matter with the ghost gutzwiller approximation, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013242 (2024)

    2024

  58. [66]

    Giuli, H

    S. Giuli, H. Hasan, B. Kloss, M. S. Frank, T.-H. Lee, O. Gingras, Y.-X. Yao, and N. Lanatà, Linear foundation model for quantum embedding: Data-driven compression of the ghost gutzwiller variational space, PRX Intelligence 1, 013001 (2026)

    2026

  59. [67]

    Giuli, T.-H

    S. Giuli, T.-H. Lee, Y.-X. Yao, G. Kotliar, A. E. Rucken- stein, O.Gingras,andN.Lanatà,Unifyingvariationaland dynamical quantum embedding: From ghost gutzwiller approximation to dynamical mean-field theory (2026), arXiv:2603.20559 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2026

  60. [68]

    Giuliet al., Efficient and effective quantum embed- ding methods for strongly correlated materials and mod- els, PhD thesis (2025)

    S. Giuliet al., Efficient and effective quantum embed- ding methods for strongly correlated materials and mod- els, PhD thesis (2025)

    2025

  61. [69]

    Barone, R

    P. Barone, R. Raimondi, M. Capone, and C. Castellani, Effective electron-phonon coupling and polaronic transi- tion in the presence of strong correlation, Phys. Rev. B 73, 085120 (2006)

    2006

  62. [70]

    Barone, R

    P. Barone, R. Raimondi, M. Capone, C. Castellani, and M. Fabrizio, Gutzwiller scheme for electrons and phonons: The half-filled hubbard-holstein model, Phys. Rev. B77, 235115 (2008)

    2008

  63. [71]

    Lanatà, X

    N. Lanatà, X. Deng, and G. Kotliar, Finite-temperature gutzwiller approximation from the time-dependent varia- tional principle, Phys. Rev. B92, 081108(R) (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    N.Lanatà, Y.Yao, C.-Z.Wang, K.-M.Ho,andG.Kotliar, Phase diagram and electronic structure of praseodymium and plutonium, Phys. Rev. X5, 011008 (2015)

    2015

  65. [73]

    Ciuchi, F

    S. Ciuchi, F. de Pasquale, S. Fratini, and D. Feinberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of the small polaron, Phys. 15 Rev. B56, 4494 (1997)

    1997

  66. [74]

    Benedetti and R

    P. Benedetti and R. Zeyher, Holstein model in infinite dimensions at half-filling, Phys. Rev. B58, 14320 (1998)

    1998

  67. [75]

    Capone and S

    M. Capone and S. Ciuchi, Polaron crossover and bipola- ronic metal-insulator transition in the half-filled holstein model, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 186405 (2003)

    2003

  68. [76]

    Capone, P

    M. Capone, P. Carta, and S. Ciuchi, Dynamical mean field theory of polarons and bipolarons in the half-filled holstein model, Phys. Rev. B74, 045106 (2006)

    2006

  69. [77]

    A. J. Millis, R. Mueller, and B. I. Shraiman, Fermi-liquid- to-polaron crossover. i. general results, Phys. Rev. B54, 5389 (1996)

    1996

  70. [78]

    Ciuchi and F

    S. Ciuchi and F. de Pasquale, Charge-ordered state from weak to strong coupling, Phys. Rev. B59, 5431 (1999)

    1999

  71. [79]

    La Sapienza

    G. Sangiovanni,The electron-phonon interaction in strongly correlated electron systems, Ph.D. thesis, Univer- sità degli studi di Roma “La Sapienza” (2004)

    2004

  72. [80]

    Crippa, I

    L. Crippa, I. Krivenko, S. Giuli, G. Bellomia, A. Kowal- ski, F. Petocchi, A. Scazzola, M. Wallerberger, G. Mazza, L. de Medici, G. Sangiovanni, M. Capone, and A. Amar- icci, Codebase release 5.3 for EDIpack, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 58 (2025)

    2025

  73. [81]

    Crippa, I

    L. Crippa, I. Krivenko, S. Giuli, G. Bellomia, A. Kowal- ski, F. Petocchi, A. Scazzola, M. Wallerberger, G. Mazza, L. de Medici, G. Sangiovanni, M. Capone, and A. Amar- icci, Next-generation EDIpack: A Lanczos-based package for quantum impurity models featuring general broken-...

    2025

  74. [82]

    Toschi, M

    A. Toschi, M. Capone, and C. Castellani, Energetic bal- ance of the superconducting transition across the bcs— bose einstein crossover in the attractive hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B72, 235118 (2005)

    2005

  75. [83]

    Toschi, P

    A. Toschi, P. Barone, M. Capone, and C. Castellani, Pair- ing and superconductivity from weak to strong coupling in the attractive hubbard model, New Journal of Physics 7, 7 (2005)

    2005

  76. [84]

    Murakami, P

    Y. Murakami, P. Werner, N. Tsuji, and H. Aoki, Ordered phases in the holstein-hubbard model: Interplay of strong coulomb interaction and electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. B88, 125126 (2013)

    2013

  77. [85]

    Nosarzewski, E

    B. Nosarzewski, E. W. Huang, P. M. Dee, I. Esterlis, B. Moritz, S. A. Kivelson, S. Johnston, and T. P. De- vereaux, Superconductivity, charge density waves, and bipolarons in the holstein model, Phys. Rev. B103, 235156 (2021)

    2021

  78. [86]

    Zhang, J

    C. Zhang, J. Sous, D. R. Reichman, M. Berciu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, and B. V. Svistunov, Bipola- ronic high-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011010 (2023)

    2023

  79. [87]

    J. Sous, C. Zhang, M. Berciu, D. R. Reichman, B. V. Svistunov, N. V. Prokof’ev, and A. J. Millis, Bipolaronic superconductivity out of a coulomb gas, Phys. Rev. B 108, L220502 (2023)

    2023

  80. [88]

    Amaricci, L

    A. Amaricci, L. Crippa, A. Scazzola, F. Petocchi, G. Mazza, L. de Medici, and M. Capone, Edipack: A parallel exact diagonalization package for quantum impu- rity problems, Computer Physics Communications273, 108261 (2022)

    2022

  81. [89]

    A. E. Antipov and I. Krivenko, pomerol: 1.1 (2015)

    2015

  82. [90]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  83. [91]

    Devos and J

    L. Devos and J. Haegeman, Tensorkit.jl: A julia package for large-scale tensor computations, with a hint of cate- gory theory (2026), arXiv:2508.10076 [cs.MS]

    2026 arXiv

  84. [92]

    X a ¯fRa(τ)R R,aα ¯ΦR(τ),Φ R(τ) # ×

    H. Zhai, H. Larsson, S. Lee, Z.-H. Cui, T. Zhu, C. Sun, L. Peng, R. Peng, K. Liao, J. Tölle,et al., Block2: A comprehensive open source framework to develop and ap- ply state-of-the-art dmrg algorithms in electronic struc- ture and beyond, Journal of Chemical Physics159, 10.10...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.