Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Multimode phonon-mediated enhancement of entanglement and competing synchronization in cavity magnomechanics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read More phonon modes monotonically strengthen stationary entanglement between cavity-magnon polaritons, while phase synchronization weakens and amplitude squeezing grows.

desk verdict Standard-formalism paper whose k-scaling result is genuine but rests on an idealized identical-mode assumption; worth refereeing with clear requests for a k=1 baseline and a robustness scan over mode couplings. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07034 v1 pith:XXBP4YRD submitted 2026-08-07 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hall
keywords cavitymagnomechanicspolaritonentanglementmultimodephononmediationquantumsynchronizationStokesandanti-Stokesscatteringlogarithmicnegativitycontinuous-variableGaussianstatesYIGsphere
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that in a cavity magnomechanical system, coupling the two cavity-magnon polaritons to many vibrational (phonon) modes turns each mode into a parallel scattering channel, and the stationary entanglement between the polaritons grows monotonically with the number of channels $k$: the logarithmic negativity rises from about $0.14$ at $k=2$ to about $0.33$ at $k=50$. The same Stokes and anti-Stokes scattering processes that build entanglement also produce quadrature-selective synchronization: amplitude synchronization rises above the vacuum level ($S_x>1$, growing with $k$), while phase synchronization decreases with $k$. If correct, this gives a quantitative route to stronger bipartite entanglement and collective squeezing in hybrid magnomechanical platforms without external squeezing drives. The paper also shows that genuine tripartite entanglement between the two polaritons and each phonon mode peaks at that mode's own frequency, so the multimode configuration acts as a frequency-selective correlation engine.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the multimode drift matrix $\Lambda$ of the linearized quantum Langevin equations, obtained by expanding about large steady-state polariton amplitudes produced by a strong magnon drive. Each phonon mode $b_j$ contributes a pair of $2\times 2$ coupling blocks $A_{j\pm}$ and $B_{j\pm}$ that connect the polariton quadratures to the mechanical quadratures with effective couplings $G_j = 2i G_{0j}\langle c\rangle$, so when the bare couplings are comparable ($G_{0j}\simeq G_0$) all channels share a common strength set by the drive. Solving the Lyapunov equation $\Lambda V + V\Lambda^T = -\Gamma$ for the $(4+2k)\times(4+2k)$ covariance matrix yields the entanglement and synchronization quantifiers; the resonance condition $\Delta_+ \simeq \omega_1$, $\Delta_- \simeq -\omega_1$ places the lower polariton on the Stokes sideband and the upper polariton on the anti-Stokes sideband, which is the physical route by which correlations are generated and transferred.

What would settle it

Take a real YIG sphere with its measured discrete mechanical eigenfrequencies and bare magnetostrictive couplings, and compute the steady-state logarithmic negativity as more phonon modes are coupled while keeping the drive fixed; if $E_N$ stops growing monotonically with $k$ once the comparable-coupling assumption is replaced by realistic uneven couplings, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that multimode phonon mediation is not merely a small correction to the single-phonon protocol: in the parameter regime explored, each additional phonon mode adds a near-resonant Stokes and anti-Stokes scattering pathway, and the correlations transferred along these parallel pathways accumulate. As a result, the steady-state logarithmic negativity $E_N$ between the upper and lower polariton modes increases monotonically with the number of phonon modes $k$, from $E_N\simeq 0.14$ at $k=2$ to $E_N\simeq 0.33$ at $k=50$. The same mechanism drives quantum synchronization between the polaritons but with opposite scaling in the two quadratures: the phase-synchronization measure $S_p$ falls as $k$ grows, while the amplitude measure $S_x$ exceeds unity and rises from about $1.15$ to $1.30$, meaning the polariton difference mode is collectively squeezed in amplitude without any injected squeezing. The paper further reports that genuine tripartite entanglement among the polaritons and a given phonon mode is activated only above a $k$-dependent frequency-spacing threshold and peaks when the polariton splitting matches that mode's frequency.

Load-bearing premise

The monotonic scaling assumes that every added phonon mode has comparable bare magnetostrictive coupling and sits close enough to the polariton resonance that the microwave drive uniformly raises all effective couplings to one common value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stationary polariton-polariton entanglement increases with phonon number $k$, reaching $E_N\simeq 0.33$ at $k=50$, more than twice the $k=2$ value.
  • The optimal hybridization angle shifts toward the instability boundary as $k$ grows, so the multimode ensemble relaxes the asymmetry between Stokes and anti-Stokes channels required for stable entanglement.
  • Amplitude synchronization $S_x$ exceeds unity and grows with $k$, demonstrating collective squeezing of the polariton difference mode without an external squeezing drive.
  • Phase synchronization $S_p$ decreases as $k$ grows, so entanglement enhancement and phase synchronization compete in the multimode regime.
  • Each phonon mode mediates genuine tripartite entanglement peaked at its own frequency, enabling mode-resolved, frequency-selective correlation engineering.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the monotonic scaling persists under realistic mode spectra, YIG spheres or phononic crystals with many near-degenerate mechanical modes could be used to increase polariton entanglement without raising the drive power.
  • The reported tradeoff suggests a control knob: selecting $k$ tunes the quadrature in which synchronization is strongest, which could be used to route quantum correlations in a frequency-selective way.
  • The mode-resolved tripartite entanglement indicates that the same platform could act as a multimode quantum interface where each mechanical mode is individually addressable by detuning.
  • A direct experimental test would be to sweep the number of actively coupled phonon modes and check whether both the entanglement curve and the reduction in $S_p$ match the predicted scaling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a cavity magnomechanical system in which two cavity-magnon polaritons are coupled to k phonon modes, and analyzes their stationary quantum correlations using linearized quantum Langevin equations, the Lyapunov equation for the covariance matrix, logarithmic negativity for bipartite entanglement, residual contangle for tripartite entanglement, and the Mari et al. synchronization measures. The central claim is that, in the parameter regime explored, increasing k monotonically enhances the stationary polariton-polariton entanglement (from about 0.14 at k=2 to 0.33 at k=50), while the amplitude synchronization Sx exceeds unity and grows with k, and the phase synchronization Sp decreases with k. The paper also reports mode-resolved tripartite entanglement and a robustness analysis with respect to temperature and damping.

Significance. If the central scaling result is correct, the paper would establish multimode phonon mediation as a practical route to stronger polariton entanglement and quadrature-selective synchronization, going beyond single-phonon protocols. The manuscript uses standard and internally consistent methods: the linearization, Lyapunov solution, stability checks, and Gaussian entanglement measures are appropriate, and the parameter table is explicit and experimentally anchored. The paper also contains useful numerical results on mode-resolved tripartite entanglement and the trade-off between entanglement and phase synchronization. However, the decisive claim of monotonic k-enhancement currently rests on an idealized identical-channel assumption and on the absence of a k=1 baseline, so the significance is conditional on a robustness analysis that is not yet provided.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, discussion of Fig. 5(b), underpinning Figs. 2, 4, 6, 8] The monotonic enhancement of EN with k is computed under the explicit assumption that all selected phonon modes have comparable bare magnetostrictive couplings (G0j ≃ G0), the same damping κj, and near-resonant frequencies spaced by Δω/2π = 2 MHz. Since the coupling blocks in the drift matrix, Eqs. (9)-(12), enter as sums over modes weighted by Gj, a realistic spread in G0j or in the phonon frequencies changes the effective number of participating channels. The manuscript provides no evidence that a 250-μm YIG sphere offers many modes with comparable magnetostrictive strength within a few MHz of the polariton resonance, and the cited experiments demonstrate strong coupling only to a few modes. I ask the authors to either justify the mode-selection assumption experimentally or add a systematic robustness study with disordered G0j, κj, and ωj, showing that the monotonic EN(k) behavior survives realistic spreads. The closing sentence of the Conclusion, which lists "disorder in phonon spectra" as future work, indicates that this missing test is recognized by the authors.
  2. [§III, Fig. 4(b)] No k=1 baseline is provided. The abstract and introduction claim that the multimode scheme goes "beyond" conventional single-mode protocols, but the comparison is made only against k=2. Since the claimed monotonic scaling cannot be assessed without the single-channel reference, the authors should compute EN for k=1 in the same setup, or provide the analytic single-mode limit, and show that the k=2 value is not already saturating the accessible entanglement. If the single-mode entanglement is comparable to the k=2 value, the phrase "monotonic enhancement" would require reinterpretation.
  3. [§III, Fig. 4(a)-(b) and Fig. 8] The scaling result is obtained after optimizing θ (and selecting Δω/2π = 2 MHz) for each k, with all modes treated as identical. Because θopt shifts with k and because every added mode has the same effective coupling, it is not clear whether the monotonicity is a physical property of the multimode mechanism or an artifact of re-optimizing a collective parameter under an identical-channel assumption. The authors should either (i) provide an analytic argument for the scaling of the effective collective coupling with k, or (ii) show monotonicity at a fixed, experimentally chosen θ and at detunings away from the optimal resonance condition. Without this, the central claim that "each additional phonon mode opens a new scattering pathway" with a monotonic effect is not yet established beyond the specific selected parameters.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The line "show that , in the parameter regime" contains an extra space before the comma; it should read "show that, in the parameter regime".
  2. [Eq. (9)] The block matrix notation uses "0k" in the off-diagonal phonon blocks; this should be written as 02×2 or replaced by an explicit zero matrix, since each block is two-dimensional.
  3. [Table I caption and Fig. 7] The table caption reads "Tab. ( I)" instead of "Table I", and the mechanical damping is denoted κb in Fig. 7 while the main text uses κj; please unify the notation.
  4. [Eq. (28) and surrounding text] The difference quadratures are introduced as X̃− and P̃−, but the arbitrary quadrature Xϕ is written without a tilde; define all quadrature variables consistently.
  5. [Throughout] There are several typographical ligature issues such as "efficient" for "efficient"; a final proofreading pass is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entanglement and synchronization values are outputs of the Lyapunov solution, and the equal-coupling multimode assumption is an explicit modeling input, not a fitted target.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained in the relevant sense. The Hamiltonian in Eq. (1), the linearized quantum Langevin equations in Eq. (6), and the drift matrix in Eq. (9) define the model; the steady-state covariance matrix is obtained by solving the Lyapunov equation (Eq. 17) without reference to any target value of EN or S. The logarithmic negativity (Eq. 22) and synchronization measures (Eq. 28) are computed as outputs of that covariance matrix. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction. The central assumption of comparable bare magnetostrictive couplings, stated explicitly in Section III around Fig. 5 ('we assume comparable bare magnetostrictive couplings G0j ≃ G0 for the selected phonon modes'), is a transparent modeling idealization that makes the multimode-scaling result conditional, but the monotonic EN(k) curve is a numerical consequence of the model, not identical to the assumption by construction. The self-citations in the reference list are background references to prior cavity-magnomechanical work and are not load-bearing evidence for the central scaling claim; the core mechanism is grounded in external references [10,28,29] and standard Lyapunov/entanglement formalism. The absence of a k=1 baseline and the idealization of identical phonon channels are robustness concerns, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main input burden is a set of tunable parameters and the idealized assumption of identical phonon channels; no new entities are introduced. The central claim is a numerical consequence of the linearized Lyapunov model for selected parameter sets, not a first-principles derivation, and no code is provided.

free parameters (5)
  • Phonon frequency spacing Delta_omega/2pi = 2 MHz
    Chosen to maximize bipartite entanglement while keeping tripartite entanglement activated; Fig. 2 scans 2, 5, and 10 MHz and finds 2 MHz best for k=2, 6, 12; used in all subsequent figures.
  • First phonon frequency omega_1/2pi = 10 MHz
    Sets the resonance condition Delta_+ = -Delta_- = omega_1; chosen as a reference frequency rather than independently measured for the full multimode ensemble.
  • Mixing angle theta/pi = 0.4pi fixed; theta_opt(k) between about 0.376 and 0.337
    Tunable hybridization angle; theta=0.4pi is used for scans, then theta is re-optimized to maximize EN for each k in Figs. 4 and 6.
  • Effective magnomechanical coupling G_j/2pi = 2 MHz
    Strong-drive-enhanced coupling chosen to be identical for all modes; not derived from a specific mechanical mode spectrum.
  • Polariton detunings Delta_+ and Delta_- = Delta_+ = -Delta_- = omega_1
    Optimal resonance condition maximizing entanglement and synchronization; varied around this condition in Figs. 5 and 8.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The cavity-magnon interaction is a beam-splitter coupling g(a-dagger c + a c-dagger) with no nonlinear terms; the polariton basis diagonalizes it.
    Used in Eqs. (1)-(5); standard for YIG cavity magnonics in the linear, strong-coupling regime.
  • domain assumption The magnomechanical interaction is dispersive, of the form G_0j(b_j + b_j-dagger)c-dagger c, with negligible radiation pressure and mechanical frequencies far below the microwave frequencies.
    Eq. (1) and section II; valid for a YIG sphere, but assumes all k mechanical modes remain in the dispersive regime.
  • ad hoc to paper All selected phonon modes have comparable bare magnetostrictive couplings and are uniformly enhanced by the drive (G_0j about G_0 and G_j about G).
    Stated in section III; essential for the monotonic enhancement with k, but not guaranteed by the YIG sphere mechanical spectrum.
  • domain assumption Quantum fluctuations are small enough to linearize the QLEs and neglect second-order fluctuation terms; the steady state is Gaussian.
    Used after Eq. (6); standard in cavity optomechanics and requires a strong drive and low occupancy.
  • domain assumption Input noises are Markovian and zero-mean, with thermal occupations given by Bose-Einstein factors.
    Eq. (7); standard quantum noise model for microwave, magnon, and mechanical baths.
  • standard math The condition Re(eig Lambda) < 0 is sufficient for a physical steady state of the linearized system.
    End of section II; standard Lyapunov stability condition for linear Gaussian dynamics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multimode phonon-mediated enhancement of entanglement and competing synchronization in cavity magnomechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XXBP4YRD

@misc{pith2026260807034,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multimode phonon-mediated enhancement of entanglement and competing synchronization in cavity magnomechanics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XXBP4YRD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07034}
}
read the original abstract

The generation of quantum correlations in hybrid quantum systems remains a central challenge due to the intrinsic limitations of linear interactions. In cavity magnomechanical platforms, the cavity-magnon coupling gives rise to hybridized cavity-magnon polaritons (CMPs). However, as a beam-splitter-type interaction, it does not by itself generate entanglement between the polariton modes in the absence of additional nonlinear or parametric processes. Here, we propose a mechanism based on multimode phonon mediation, in which multiple vibrational modes act as parallel scattering channels that couple the polaritons through Stokes and anti-Stokes processes. We show that , in the parameter regime explored here, the presence of multiple phonon modes leads to a monotonic enhancement of steady-state entanglement, thereby going beyond the limitations of conventional single-mode schemes. Furthermore, we demonstrate that quantum synchronization between the polariton modes originates from the same underlying scattering processes responsible for entanglement generation, yet exhibits an opposite scaling behavior with increasing phonon number for the phase quadrature, while the amplitude synchronization reveals collective squeezing that grows with the number of phonon channels. Our results provide new insights into the role of multimode interactions in shaping quantum correlations and establish a viable pathway for controlling entanglement and collective dynamics in hybrid magnomechanical platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07034 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (a) shows the stationary polariton entanglement EN as a function of the mixing angle θ for k = 2, 6, 12, 25, and 50 phonon modes. The system is dynami￾cally unstable for θ/π ≲ 0.25, a regime where the Stokes and anti-Stokes scattering rates are nearly balanced and no stationary entanglement can be sustained. Beyond this threshold, EN exhibits a pronounced peak whose amplitude grows monotonically with k: Emax N ≃ 0.1… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: shows the robustness of the polariton-polariton entanglement against thermal bath and dissipation for k = 2 phonon modes. Panel (a) shows E p+p− N as a function of the bath temperature T and the mechani￾cal damping rate κb. The entanglement persists up to T ≃ 150 mK wh…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    considered only two phonon modes with ω2 = 3ω1, corresponding to a fixed spacing of ∆ω/2π = 20 MHz. Here, we systematically explore smaller spacings and extend the analysis well beyond k = 2, which allows us to determine the spacing that maximizes entanglement while keeping all phonon frequencies in the megahertz range, well below the magnon frequency in ...

  2. [1]

    B. Z. Rameshti, S. V. Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Us- ami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, Cavity Magnonics, Physics Reports, 979, 1 (2022)

  3. [2]

    O. O. Soykal and M. E. Flatté, Strong field interactions between a nanomagnet and a photonic cavity, Physical Review Letters, 104, 077202 (2010)

  4. [3]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goen- nenwein, High cooperativity in coupled microwave res- onator ferrimagnetic insulator hybrids, Physical Review Letters, 111, 127003 (2013). 11

  5. [4]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit, Physical Review Letters, 113, 083603 (2014)

  6. [5]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys- ical Review Letters, 113, 156401 (2014)

  7. [6]

    J. J. Hopfield, Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals, Physical Review, 112, 1555 (1958)

  8. [7]

    H. Deng, H. Haug, and Y. Yamamoto, Exciton- polariton Bose–Einstein condensation, Reviews of Mod- ern Physics, 82, 1489 (2010)

Show all 48 references
  1. [8]

    Kasprzak, M

    J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeambrun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szymanska, R. André, J. L. Staehli, V. Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and L. S. Dang, Bose–Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons, Nature, 443, 409 (2006)

  2. [9]

    Ballarini, M

    D. Ballarini, M. D. Giorgi, E. Cancellieri, R. Houdré, E. Giacobino, R. Cingolani, A. Bramati, G. Gigli, and D. Sanvitto, All-optical polariton transistor, Nature Com- munications, 4, 1778 (2013)

  3. [10]

    Zuo, Z.-Y

    X. Zuo, Z.-Y. Fan, H. Qian, M.-S. Ding, H. Tan, H. Xiong, and J. Li, Cavity magnomechanics: from clas- sical to quantum, New Journal Of Physics, 26, 031201 (2024)

  4. [11]

    J. X. Peng, A. Kundu , Z. X. Liu, A. U. Rahman, N. Akhtar, M. Asjad, Vector photon-magnon-phonon co- herence in a polarized microwave driven cavity mag- nomechanical system. Physical Review B, 109, 064412 (2024)

  5. [12]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Magnon-photon- phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics, Phys- ical Review Letters, 121, 203601 (2018)

  6. [13]

    H. Y. Yuan, P. Yan, S. Zheng, Q. Y. He, K. Xia, and M.-H. Yung, Steady Bell state generation via magnon- photon coupling, Physical Review Letters, 124, 053602 (2020)

  7. [14]

    Shang, D.-D

    X. Shang, D.-D. Chen, H. Xie, G.-W. Lin, and X.- M. Lin, Generation of microwave-optics entanglement via reservoir engineering in cavity magnonic systems, Physics Letters A, 493, 129263 (2024)

  8. [15]

    Wu, Y.-P

    W.-J. Wu, Y.-P. Wang, J.-Z. Wu, J. Li, and J. Q. You, Remote magnon entanglement between two massive fer- rimagnetic spheres via cavity optomagnonics, Physical Review A, 104, 023711 (2021)

  9. [16]

    Feed- back control of quantum correlations in a cavity mag- nomechanical system with magnon squeezing

    Amazioug, M., Singh, S., Teklu, B., Asjad, M. Feed- back control of quantum correlations in a cavity mag- nomechanical system with magnon squeezing. Entropy, 25(10), 1462 (2023)

  10. [17]

    P., Anouz, K

    Imara, Z., Castillo, I. P., Anouz, K. E., Allati, A. E. Tunable Entangling and Steering of Ferrimagnetic Magnons Via an OptoMagnoMechanical Ring. Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies, 9(1), e00726 (2026)

  11. [18]

    El Allati, Quantum effect in a hybrid bose-einstein condensate opto-magnomechanical system

    Imara, Z., El Anouz, K., Saif, F., A. El Allati, Quantum effect in a hybrid bose-einstein condensate opto-magnomechanical system. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 57(23), 235501 (2024)

  12. [19]

    A. Mari, A. Farace, N. Didier, V. Giovannetti, and R. Fazio, Measures of quantum synchronization in contin- uous variable systems, Physical Review Letters, 111, 103605 (2013)

  13. [20]

    Garg, Manju, S

    D. Garg, Manju, S. Dasgupta, and A. Biswas, Quantum synchronization and entanglement of indirectly coupled mechanical oscillators, Physics Letters A, 457, 128557 (2023)

  14. [21]

    Ghosh, S

    J. Ghosh, S. Mondal, S. K. Varshney, and K. Debnath, Simultaneous control of quantum phase synchronization and entanglement dynamics, Physical Review A, 109, 023512 (2024)

  15. [22]

    J.-X. Peng, C. Zhao, P. Djorwe, Z.-W. Yu, and M. Asjad, Macroscopic quantum coherence and quantum complete synchronization in molecular optomechanical system, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 197, 116473 (2025)

  16. [23]

    Ghildiyal, S

    J. Ghildiyal, S. Dasgupta, and A. Biswas, Quan- tum synchronization between two strongly driven YIG spheres mediated via a microwave cavity, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 59, 105303 (2026)

  17. [24]

    X., Singh, S

    Peng, J. X., Singh, S. K., Akhtar, N., Gu, Z., Wu, C., Li, J. F, Symmetric vs asymmetric magnon pair- ing: Comparative study of quantum entanglement and synchronization in the cavity-magnon system. Physical Review A, 112(4), 042430 (2025)

  18. [25]

    A. S. Kuznetsov, K. Biermann, A. A. Reynoso, A. Fainstein, and P. V. Santos, Microcavity phonoritons: a coherent optical-to-microwave interface, Nature Com- munications, 14, 5470 (2023)

  19. [26]

    G., Liao, J

    Huang, J., Lai, D. G., Liao, J. Q, Thermal-noise- resistant optomechanical entanglement via general dark-mode control. Physical Review A, 106(6), 063506 (2022)

  20. [27]

    L., Wu, S

    Yang, Z., Cheng, H., Huang, X. L., Wu, S. M, Genera- tion of Quantum Entanglement in a Multimode Cav- ity‐Optomechanical System via Periodic Modulation. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 9(2), e00918 (2026)

  21. [29]

    Y., Qian, H., Shen, R

    Zuo, X., Fan, Z. Y., Qian, H., Shen, R. C., Li, J, En- tangling cavity-magnon polaritons by interacting with phonons. Quantum Science and Technology, 10(2), 025052 (2025)

  22. [30]

    C., Li, J., Sun, Y

    Shen, R. C., Li, J., Sun, Y. M., Wu, W. J., Zuo, X., Wang, Y. P., You, J. Q, Cavity-magnon polaritons strongly coupled to phonons. Nature Communications, 16(1), 5652 (2025)

  23. [31]

    Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 57(18), 185501 (2024)

    Imara, Z., El Anouz, K., El Allati, A, Engineering and control of the entanglement for four Magnon modes inside two microwave cavities. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 57(18), 185501 (2024)

  24. [32]

    L., Jiang, L., Tang, H

    Zhang, X., Zou, C. L., Jiang, L., Tang, H. X, Cav- ity magnomechanics. Science Advances, 2(3), e1501286 (2016)

  25. [33]

    A., Varga, E., Bittencourt, V

    Potts, C. A., Varga, E., Bittencourt, V. A., Kusmin- skiy, S. V., Davis, J. P, Dynamical backaction mag- nomechanics. Physical Review X, 11(3), 031053 (2021)

  26. [34]

    C., Li, J., Fan, Z

    Shen, R. C., Li, J., Fan, Z. Y., Wang, Y. P., You, J. Q, Mechanical bistability in Kerr-modified cavity mag- nomechanics. Physical Review Letters, 129(12), 123601 (2022)

  27. [35]

    T., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y

    Shen, Z., Xu, G. T., Zhang, M., Zhang, Y. L., Wang, Y., Chai, C. Z., Dong, C. H, Coherent coupling between phonons, magnons, and photons. Physical Review Let- ters, 129(24), 243601 (2022)

  28. [36]

    E., Demir, İ., Allati, A

    Imara, Z., Anouz, K. E., Demir, İ., Allati, A. E, Non- reciprocal macroscopic entanglement through magnon squeezing in cavity magnomechanics. Physical Review 12 A, 113(5), 053717 (2026)

  29. [37]

    C. W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

  30. [38]

    R., Tombesi, P., Guerreiro, A., Aspelmeyer, M, Optome- chanical entanglement between a movable mirror and a cavity field

    Vitali, D., Gigan, S., Ferreira, A., Böhm, H. R., Tombesi, P., Guerreiro, A., Aspelmeyer, M, Optome- chanical entanglement between a movable mirror and a cavity field. Physical Review Letters, 98(3), 030405 (2007)

  31. [39]

    F, Computable measure of en- tanglement

    Vidal, G., Werner, R. F, Computable measure of en- tanglement. Physical Review A, 65(3), 032314 (2002)

  32. [40]

    Physical Review A, 70(2), 022318 (2004)

    Adesso, G., Serafini, A., Illuminati, F, Extremal entan- glement and mixedness in continuous variable systems. Physical Review A, 70(2), 022318 (2004)

  33. [41]

    B, Logarithmic negativity: a full entangle- ment monotone that is not convex

    Plenio, M. B, Logarithmic negativity: a full entangle- ment monotone that is not convex. Physical Review Letters, 95(9), 090503 (2005)

  34. [42]

    Teklu, Continuous-variable entanglement dynamics in Lorentzian environment, Physics Letters A, 432, 128022 (2022)

    B. Teklu, Continuous-variable entanglement dynamics in Lorentzian environment, Physics Letters A, 432, 128022 (2022)

  35. [43]

    G, Noisy propagation of Gaussian states in optical media with finite bandwidth

    Teklu, B., Bina, M., Paris, M. G, Noisy propagation of Gaussian states in optical media with finite bandwidth. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 11646 (2022)

  36. [44]

    New Journal of Physics, 8(1), 15-15 (2006)

    Adesso, G., Illuminati, F, Continuous variable tan- gle, monogamy inequality, and entanglement sharing in Gaussian states of continuous variable systems. New Journal of Physics, 8(1), 15-15 (2006)

  37. [45]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoret- ical, 40(28), 7821-7880 (2007)

    Adesso, G., Illuminati, F, Entanglement in continuous- variable systems: recent advances and current perspec- tives. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoret- ical, 40(28), 7821-7880 (2007)

  38. [46]

    K, Dis- tributed entanglement

    Coffman, V., Kundu, J., Wootters, W. K, Dis- tributed entanglement. Physical Review A, 61(5), 052306 (2000)

  39. [47]

    D., Jusserand, B., Perrin, B, Strong Optical-Mechanical Coupling in a Vertical GaAs/AlAs Microcavity for Subterahertz Phonons and Near-Infrared Light

    Fainstein, A., Lanzillotti-Kimura, N. D., Jusserand, B., Perrin, B, Strong Optical-Mechanical Coupling in a Vertical GaAs/AlAs Microcavity for Subterahertz Phonons and Near-Infrared Light. Physical Review Let- ters, 110(3), 037403 (2013)

  40. [48]

    G., Creedon, D

    Goryachev, M., Farr, W. G., Creedon, D. L., Fan, Y., Kostylev, M., Tobar, M. E, High-cooperativity cavity QED with magnons at microwave frequencies. Physical Review Applied, 2(5), 054002 (2014)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.