Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 71 references

Overaging with stress in polymer glasses? Faster segmental dynamics despite larger yield stress!

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Aging a PMMA glass under a 9 MPa stress raises its yield stress while making its segmental dynamics faster, directly contradicting the overaging interpretation of stress-accelerated aging.

desk verdict Direct probe-reorientation measurements show stress-aged PMMA has a higher yield stress yet faster segmental dynamics, undercutting the overaging interpretation, though missing error bars and relying on a probe proxy. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07310 v1 pith:J4YYBVLN submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Masoud Razavi , Enran Xing , M.D. Ediger This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords polymerglassesphysicalagingoveragingyieldstresssegmentaldynamicsprobereorientationPMMA
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether applying a moderate stress while a polymer glass ages makes it age faster, a process sometimes called overaging. The authors aged PMMA at 380 K under a constant 9 MPa tensile stress for 20 hours and then measured two things on the same samples: the yield stress in a subsequent tensile test, and the segmental dynamics measured by a photobleaching probe. Stress-aged samples showed a yield stress about 6% higher than quiescently aged samples, but their segmental relaxation time after stress release was about a factor of two faster, and it stayed faster for at least 30,000 seconds. That is the opposite of what overaging predicts. The paper concludes that yield stress is not a simple function of structural relaxation time and that theories equating yield stress with polymer age need revision.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing measurement is photobleaching probe reorientation of DCCP molecules dispersed at tracer concentration in the PMMA glass. A polarized laser selectively bleaches probes; the decay of fluorescence anisotropy $r(t)$ is fit to a Kohlrausch-Williams-Watts function $r(t)=r(0)\exp[-(t/\tau)^\beta]$, and the relaxation time $\tau_{KWW}$ is taken as the segmental relaxation time. This optical measurement can be run while the sample sits in the mechanical test cell, so the same thermal-mechanical history yields both yield stress and segmental dynamics. The argument's logical machinery is a two-arm comparison: identical thermal/time protocols with and without a constant stress, with the yield stress measured in a constant strain-rate ramp and the dynamics measured by the probe. The central contradiction is that stress-aged samples have larger yield stress and smaller $\tau_{KWW}$ simultaneously.

What would settle it

Perform a probe-free measurement of segmental relaxation, such as dielectric relaxation spectroscopy, on the same stress-aged PMMA protocol at 380 K; if the measured relaxation time after stress release is longer than or equal to that of the quiescently aged sample, the central observation fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a decoupling of mechanical and dynamical age under stress. For lightly crosslinked PMMA aged at 380 K, holding the sample under a constant 9 MPa stress for 72,000 s increased the subsequent yield stress from 32.2 MPa (quiescent) to 34.1 MPa, a 6% rise, while the segmental relaxation time measured by probe reorientation fell from roughly 45,000 s to 26,000 s, about a factor of two faster. The faster dynamics persisted for at least 30,000 s after the stress was released, and the same qualitative pattern held in a second protocol with stress removed after 18,000 s and in a lower-temperature (360 K) comparison. The authors therefore conclude that the higher yield stress of stress-aged samples is not evidence of accelerated physical aging; the glass is dynamically younger and yet mechanically stronger. They also show that matching the yield stress achieved under stress by quiescent aging would require roughly 400,000 s and would correspond to a relaxation time near 104,000 s, four times the observed value under stress aging.

Load-bearing premise

The probe reorientation time $\tau_{KWW}$ is assumed to faithfully track the polymer's true segmental relaxation time while the glass is under stress and after stress release; if the probe molecule's motion decouples from segmental dynamics in the deformed glass, the 'faster dynamics after stress release' observation would not prove the glass is younger.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the conclusion holds, time-stress superposition methods that convert stress aging into an equivalent longer quiescent aging time will overestimate the relaxation time increase after stress release.
  • Yield stress alone cannot serve as a proxy for the structural age of a polymer glass; mechanical aging and dynamical aging must be tracked separately.
  • Constitutive models that let segmental relaxation time control the full nonlinear mechanical response ('material time' models) are missing at least one additional state variable.
  • The higher yield stress under stress aging may be carried by structural orientation or a mechanical state variable rather than by a denser, more aged glass.
  • Rapidly quenched simulation glasses may show overaging, but slowly cooled laboratory glasses may not, so simulation-derived overaging results should not be transferred to typical polymer processing without careful attention to the annealing state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to vary the aging stress continuously from small to large values and measure both yield stress and segmental relaxation time at fixed aging time; the paper's picture predicts a non-monotonic relation, with yield stress peaking before the relaxation time turns over.
  • The same decoupling may appear in enthalpy measurements: the Nanzai DSC data cited in the paper indicate almost no enthalpy change under strain despite higher yield stress, suggesting that mechanical strength and thermodynamic age can follow independent trajectories in other glass families.
  • If the probe is decoupled from segmental dynamics in the deformed state, the conclusions would be wrong; a direct test with an independent probe-free technique is a suitable way to settle that concern.
  • For applications, the results imply that load-bearing polymer parts could be strengthened by pre-stressing without the embrittlement normally associated with physical aging, since the segmental dynamics remain faster.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of lightly crosslinked PMMA glasses aged under constant tensile stress, comparing their yield stress and segmental dynamics with quiescently aged glasses. The authors measure segmental dynamics via DCCP probe reorientation (KWW fits) and yield stress via constant strain-rate tensile tests. Their central observation is that aging under 9 MPa at 380 K for 72,000 s produces a yield stress about 6% higher than quiescent aging, while the segmental relaxation time after stress release is about a factor of two faster, with the difference persisting for at least 30,000 s. Additional protocols at 18,000 s at 380 K and at 72,000 s at 360 K show qualitatively similar behavior and eventual recovery toward the quiescent aging trajectory. The authors interpret these results as contradicting the 'overaging' interpretation of stress-accelerated aging and conclude that yield stress is not a simple function of structural relaxation time, so theoretical models based on that assumption need revision.

Significance. If correct, the main finding is significant for the physics of polymer glasses and for constitutive modeling: it directly challenges the widely used interpretation that a stress-induced increase in yield stress implies accelerated physical aging ('overaging'), and it gives experimental support to recent arguments against the material-time assumption. The paper's strengths include the direct measurement of segmental dynamics rather than only mechanical proxies, the use of multiple aging protocols and stress-release recovery checks, the explicit comparison with Chen-Schweizer NLE theory, and the clearly stated falsifiable claim. The main limitation is that the central conclusion rests on the assumption that probe reorientation faithfully reports polymer segmental dynamics in the permanently oriented post-creep state, an assumption validated in earlier work mostly for melts and linear deformations.

major comments (4)
  1. [Discussion, first paragraph] The central claim depends on the assumption that DCCP reorientation time reports the polymer's segmental relaxation time in the specific post-creep state studied here, where the sample has accumulated 5.8% total creep and 5.1% permanent strain and is permanently oriented. The cited validation (refs 42-43, 47-49) is for polymer melts and for linear deformations; the present protocol is nonlinear and produces a recovered but oriented glass. Because the authors explicitly concede that 'our statements about the segmental dynamics of the polymer are inferences,' an independent check is needed in this state. I recommend a comparison of probe reorientation with a probe-free segmental dynamics measurement (e.g., stress relaxation modulus or dielectric spectroscopy) on identically aged and stress-released samples, or at minimum a quantitative discussion of why the probe cannot be decoupled from segmental dynamics under these conditions. Without this, the faster post-stress tau_KWW could be a probe artifact rather than evidence against overaging.
  2. [Results, Figure 2 and Table 1] The key quantitative claims are the 6% difference in yield stress (34.1 vs 32.2 MPa) and the factor-of-two difference in tau_KWW, yet no error bars or replicate statistics are provided. The main-text measurements are stated to come from one sample, and the statement that repeatability was confirmed on different samples is not accompanied by data. Sample-to-sample variation in yield stress of a few percent is common in polymer glasses and could change the sign of the 6% effect. I request at least three independent repeats of the central protocol (quiescent aging vs 9 MPa stress aging at 380 K) with reported mean and standard deviation for both yield stress and tau_KWW, and a statement of how many measurements contribute to each reported value.
  3. [Results, Figure 5 and related text] The quantitative comparison against the effective-age prediction of refs. 11-12 relies on an extrapolated tau_KWW of about 104,000 s, obtained by extrapolating the quiescent-aging power law from Figure 2b with exponent about 0.53. No uncertainty is given for this extrapolation, and the power-law exponent is fit to data from a single sample without reported fitting errors. Since the factor-of-four discrepancy is a central part of the argument against the quantitative overaging model, the authors should provide confidence intervals for the extrapolated value, perhaps by fitting the quiescent data over different time ranges and by propagating the scatter in tau_KWW.
  4. [Discussion, paragraph on chain orientation] The authors argue that chain orientation is 'likely a contributing factor but not the primary factor' based on a simple strain-hardening estimate and on the nearly constant g factor. However, the g factor measures probe alignment, not directly polymer chain orientation, and the strain-hardening calculation is not derived in detail. Because the 5.1% permanent strain could in principle orient chain segments that are not captured by the probe alignment, this part of the discussion would benefit from either direct orientation measurements (birefringence, FTIR, or simulation data) or a clearly stated uncertainty. This point is not fatal to the main conclusion, since the claim of faster dynamics after stress release does not require orientation to be absent, but it affects the interpretation of why yield stress is elevated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Experimental, probe reorientation measurement] There is a typo: 'DPPC probe molecules' should read 'DCCP probe molecules', matching the molecule name used elsewhere.
  2. [Figure 2b and Figure 3b] The axis labels and legend entries are small and somewhat crowded; adding error bars to the plotted points and increasing font size would improve readability.
  3. [Results, paragraph after Figure 2] The phrase 'always smaller than (or the same as)' is stronger than what the data show, since the 360 K protocol shows eventual overlap with the quiescent trajectory; consider rewording to 'smaller than or equal to' with the explicit time window stated.
  4. [References] Reference 64 is a preprint ('ArXiv 2019'); please update to the published version or provide the journal citation if it has appeared.
  5. [Figure 4] The inset of Figure 4 is difficult to read, particularly the linear-time expanded portion; enlarging the inset and labeling the axes more clearly would help the reader follow the recovery argument.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the key quantities are independent measurements, not derived from each other.

full rationale

The central claim is an empirical comparison: samples aged under stress have higher yield stress but faster probe reorientation times after stress release. Yield stress is measured independently by constant-strain-rate tensile deformation, while segmental dynamics are measured independently by photobleaching anisotropy decay. Neither quantity is fit to the other, and no model equation is used to convert one into the other. The KWW relaxation time is a descriptive fit parameter, not an input that forces the yield stress result. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the probe reorientation measurement is an inference about segmental dynamics, and it supports this inference with prior comparisons to probe-free mechanical and dielectric measurements; this is an empirical validation assumption, not a circular derivation, and the paper candidly flags its limitation. Agreement with the Chen-Schweizer NLE theory is external comparison, not an input to the measurement. The extrapolation in Figure 5 is used only to illustrate the contrast with the effective-age proposal of refs. 11-12, and it does not enter the central conclusion. No step in the paper reduces a prediction to its own inputs, either by definition, fitted parameter renaming, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The result is therefore self-contained as an experimental finding and no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or theoretical parameters are introduced. The paper's contribution is experimental observation; the ledger captures the measurement and sample assumptions that support it.

free parameters (2)
  • KWW stretching exponent beta = 0.31 (fixed for quiescent) or 0.28-0.31 (free under stress)
    Fitted to anisotropy decay data. Varying it does not change the relaxation time meaningfully, so it does not affect the central claim.
  • Quiescent aging power-law exponent = ~0.53
    Describes the increase of tau_KWW with aging time at 380 K; used in the secondary extrapolation of Fig. 5, not in the primary claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Probe reorientation time reports the polymer segmental relaxation time.
    The paper relies on prior validation (refs 42-45, 47-51) and states that the statements about segmental dynamics are inferences. If probe and segmental dynamics decouple under nonlinear deformation, the central observation would be undermined.
  • domain assumption Annealing above Tg erases prior mechanical and thermal history.
    The protocol relies on annealing at Tg+20 K for 1 hr to erase prior deformation and allow repeated measurements on the same sample. Insufficient erasure would contaminate the quiescent baseline.
  • standard math KWW functional form describes the anisotropy decay.
    Used to extract relaxation times from photobleaching data; is standard in the field.
  • domain assumption Yield stress measured at 380 K two minutes after stress release represents the aged-under-stress state.
    The sample retracts about 1% in those two minutes; if the recovery changes the state significantly, the comparison to the dynamics measured after release could be mismatched.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Overaging with stress in polymer glasses? Faster segmental dynamics despite larger yield stress!." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J4YYBVLN

@misc{pith2026260807310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Overaging with stress in polymer glasses? Faster segmental dynamics despite larger yield stress!},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J4YYBVLN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07310}
}
read the original abstract

It is well known that physical aging of polymer glasses increases their yield stress and affects their failure behavior. Studies indicate that application of moderate levels of stress during aging results in higher yield stress compared to aging in the absence of stress (quiescent aging). This has been interpreted to indicate that stress accelerates physical aging, and has been described as overaging. In this study, we age PMMA glasses under stress, and carry out direct measurement of segmental dynamics during and after aging by using a probe reorientation technique. We observe that samples aged under stress, despite having higher yield stress, have faster segmental dynamics after stress release than quiescently aged samples. This contradicts the overaging interpretation, for the range of conditions explored here. Our results indicate that yield stress is not a simple function of structural relaxation time and theoretical models based on this understanding need to be revised.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07310 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of DCCP; the transition dipole is parallel to the long axis, (b) Schematic diagram of the temperature-controlled mechanical deformation cell and the optical measurement system. For detailed information see ref. 42. (c) Stress-strain curves for a quiescently aged sample and a sample aged under stress of 9 MPa, indicating a higher yield stress for the sample aged under stress. Strain on the x-ax… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Temperature profile and stress condition during quiescent aging (upper panel) and aging under stress (lower panel). During aging under stress, a stress of 9 MPa was applied into the sample for 72000 s. The green dashed arrows show the yield stress recorded in a constant strain rate deformation. The constant strain rate deformation was performed about 2 minutes after the stress was set to zero. (b) Comparison of … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Temperature profile and stress condition during quiescent aging (upper panel) and aging under stress for 18000 s (lower panel). (b) Comparison of the segmental relaxation times for samples with the two aging conditions. A final set of experiments were performed to allow an even greater opportunity for recovery after aging under stress. Figure 4a shows two aging protocols. The aging temperature was 360 K and samp… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Temperature profile and stress condition during quiescent aging (upper panel) and aging under stress of 15 MPa (lower panel). Stress was applied at 360 K while the yield stress was measured at 380 K. The green dashed arrows show the yield stress recorded in a const…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Evolution of yield stress during quiescent aging at 380 K with comparison to the yield stress of the sample aged under stress of 9 MPa. The extrapolated τKWW is obtained from the data in Figure 2b. Measurement of the increase in the length of samples aged under stress …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D.; Angell, C

    Ediger, M. D.; Angell, C. A.; Nagel, S. R., Supercooled liquids and glasses. The journal of physical chemistry 1996, 100 (31), 13200-13212

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    Struik, L. C. E., Physical aging in plastics and other glassy materials. Polymer Engineering & Science 1977, 17 (3), 165-173

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    The Journal of chemical physics 2010, 133 (1), 014901

    Lee, H.-N.; Ediger, M., Interaction between physical aging, deformation, and segmental mobility in poly (methyl methacrylate) glasses. The Journal of chemical physics 2010, 133 (1), 014901

    work page 2010

  4. [4]

    B., Shear stress relaxation and physical aging study on simple glass- forming materials

    Shi, X.; Mandanici, A.; McKenna, G. B., Shear stress relaxation and physical aging study on simple glass- forming materials. The Journal of chemical physics 2005, 123 (17), 174507

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    A.; Ngai, K

    Angell, C. A.; Ngai, K. L.; McKenna, G. B.; McMillan, P. F.; Martin, S. W., Relaxation in glassforming liquids and amorphous solids. Journal of applied physics 2000, 88 (6), 3113-3157

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    L., Signatures of structural recovery in polystyrene by nanocalorimetry

    Lopez, E.; Simon, S. L., Signatures of structural recovery in polystyrene by nanocalorimetry. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (6), 2365-2374

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    A.; Bor, T

    Visser, H. A.; Bor, T. C.; Wolters, M.; Wismans, J. G.; Govaert, L. E., Lifetime Assessment of Load‐Bearing Polymer Glasses: The Influence of Physical Ageing. Macromolecular materials and engineering 2010, 295 (12), 1066-1081

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 2013, 21 (8), 085015

    Poluektov, M.; Van Dommelen, J.; Govaert, L.; Yakimets, I.; Geers, M., Micromechanical modelling of short-term and long-term large-strain behaviour of polyethylene terephthalate. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 2013, 21 (8), 085015

    work page 2013

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    V., The effect of cryogenic thermal cycling on aging, rejuvenation, and mechanical properties of metallic glasses

    Priezjev, N. V., The effect of cryogenic thermal cycling on aging, rejuvenation, and mechanical properties of metallic glasses. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 2019, 503, 131-138

    2019

  2. [10]

    Physical Review E 2007, 76 (3), 031802

    Warren, M.; Rottler, J., Simulations of aging and plastic deformation in polymer glasses. Physical Review E 2007, 76 (3), 031802. 21

    2007

  3. [11]

    Macromolecules 2005, 38 (16), 6997-7008

    Klompen, E.; Engels, T.; Govaert, L.; Meijer, H., Modeling of the postyield response of glassy polymers: influence of thermomechanical history. Macromolecules 2005, 38 (16), 6997-7008

    2005

  4. [12]

    C.; Kanters, M

    Clarijs, C. C.; Kanters, M. J.; van Erp, M. J.; Engels, T. A.; Govaert, L. E., Predicting plasticity‐controlled failure of glassy polymers: Influence of stress‐accelerated progressive physical aging. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 2019, 57 (19), 1300-1314

    2019

  5. [13]

    -J.; Ogata, S., Prediction of pressure -promoted thermal rejuvenation in metallic glasses

    Miyazaki, N.; Wakeda, M.; Wang, Y. -J.; Ogata, S., Prediction of pressure -promoted thermal rejuvenation in metallic glasses. npj Computational Materials 2016, 2 (1), 1-9

    2016

  6. [14]

    Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition 1976, 14 (4), 703-721

    Matsushige, K.; Radcliffe, S.; Baer, E., The mechanical behavior of poly (methyl methacrylate) under pressure. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition 1976, 14 (4), 703-721

    1976

  7. [15]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 1969, 51 (9), 3728-3739

    Goldstein, M., Viscous liquids and the glass transition: a potential energy barrier picture. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1969, 51 (9), 3728-3739

    1969

  8. [16]

    B., Mechanical rejuvenation in polymer glasses: fact or fallacy? Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2003, 15 (11), S737

    McKenna, G. B., Mechanical rejuvenation in polymer glasses: fact or fallacy? Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 2003, 15 (11), S737

    2003

  9. [17]

    A., Role of Local Structure in the Enhanced Dynamics of Deformed Glasses

    Yang, E.; Riggleman, R. A., Role of Local Structure in the Enhanced Dynamics of Deformed Glasses. Physical Review Letters 2022, 128 (9), 097801

    2022

  10. [18]

    A.; Schweizer, K

    Riggleman, R. A.; Schweizer, K. S.; Pablo, J. J. d., Nonlinear creep in a polymer glass. Macromolecules 2008, 41 (13), 4969-4977

    2008

  11. [19]

    Y.-H.; Rottler, J., Aging under stress in polymer glasses

    Liu, A. Y.-H.; Rottler, J., Aging under stress in polymer glasses. Soft Matter 2010, 6 (19), 4858-4862

    2010

  12. [20]

    Mota, R. M. O.; Lund, E. T.; Sohn, S.; Browne, D. J.; Hofmann, D. C.; Curtarolo, S.; van de Walle, A.; Schroers, J., Enhancing ductility in bulk metallic glasses by straining during cooling. Communications Materials 2021, 2 (1), 1-8

    2021

  13. [21]

    Acta Materialia 2014, 74, 165-182

    Magagnosc, D.; Kumar, G.; Schroers, J.; Felfer, P.; Cairney, J.; Gianola, D., Effect of ion irradiation on tensile ductility, strength and fictive temperature in metallic glass nanowires. Acta Materialia 2014, 74, 165-182

    2014

  14. [22]

    A., Photoinduced structural relaxation in chalcogenide glasses

    Lucas, P.; Doraiswamy, A.; King, E. A., Photoinduced structural relaxation in chalcogenide glasses. Journal of non-crystalline solids 2003, 332 (1-3), 35-42

    2003

  15. [23]

    A., Densification and strain hardening of a metallic glass under tension at room temperature

    Wang, Z.; Pan, J.; Li, Y.; Schuh, C. A., Densification and strain hardening of a metallic glass under tension at room temperature. Physical Review Letters 2013, 111 (13), 135504

    2013

  16. [24]

    -Y.; Peng, H

    Zhou, Z. -Y.; Peng, H. -L.; Yu, H. -B., Structural origin for vibration -induced accelerated aging and rejuvenation in metallic glasses. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2019, 150 (20), 204507

    2019

  17. [25]

    J.; Osborne, M

    Lacks, D. J.; Osborne, M. J., Energy landscape picture of overaging and rejuvenation in a sheared glass. Physical review letters 2004, 93 (25), 255501

    2004

  18. [26]

    V.; Michels, M., Time scales and mechanisms of relaxation in the energy landscape of polymer glass under deformation: direct atomistic modeling

    Lyulin, A. V.; Michels, M., Time scales and mechanisms of relaxation in the energy landscape of polymer glass under deformation: direct atomistic modeling. Physical review letters 2007, 99 (8), 085504

    2007

  19. [27]

    Viasnoff, V.; Jurine, S.; Lequeux, F., How are colloidal suspensions that age rejuvenated by strain application? Faraday Discussions 2003, 123, 253-266

    2003

  20. [28]

    Nature 2001, 413 (6854), 407-409

    D'Anna, G.; Grémaud, G., The jamming route to the glass state in weakly perturbed granular media. Nature 2001, 413 (6854), 407-409

    2001

  21. [29]

    Nature materials 2005, 4 (2), 121-128

    Richard, P.; Nicodemi, M.; Delannay, R.; Ribiere, P.; Bideau, D., Slow relaxation and compaction of granular systems. Nature materials 2005, 4 (2), 121-128

    2005

  22. [30]

    -N.; Riggleman, R

    Lee, H. -N.; Riggleman, R. A.; de Pablo, J. J.; Ediger, M., Deformation -induced mobility in polymer glasses during multistep creep experiments and simulations. Macromolecules 2009, 42 (12), 4328-4336

    2009

  23. [31]

    Journal of Applied Physics 1972, 43 (11), 4370-4383

    Sternstein, S.; Ho, T., Biaxial stress relaxation in glassy polymers: polymethylmethacrylate. Journal of Applied Physics 1972, 43 (11), 4370-4383

    1972

  24. [32]

    Polymer 1980, 21 (8), 962-967

    Struik, L., The mechanical enhancement of physical aging. Polymer 1980, 21 (8), 962-967

    1980

  25. [33]

    B.; Zapas, L

    Mckenna, G. B.; Zapas, L. J., Superposition of small strains on large deformations as a probe of nonlinear response in polymers. Polymer Engineering & Science 1986, 26 (11), 725-729. 22

    1986

  26. [34]

    Z., Aging in fully annealed and subsequently strained poly (methyl methacrylate)

    Nanzai, Y.; Miwa, A.; Cui, S. Z., Aging in fully annealed and subsequently strained poly (methyl methacrylate). Polymer journal 2000, 32 (1), 51-56

    2000

  27. [35]

    R., Acceleration and homogenization of the dynamics during plastic deformation

    Conca, L.; Dequidt, A.; Sotta, P.; Long, D. R., Acceleration and homogenization of the dynamics during plastic deformation. Macromolecules 2017, 50 (23), 9456-9472

    2017

  28. [36]

    Physical Review Letters 2012, 108 (4), 048301

    Fielding, S.; Larson, R.; Cates, M., Simple model for the deformation -induced relaxation of glassy polymers. Physical Review Letters 2012, 108 (4), 048301

    2012

  29. [37]

    S., Theory of yielding, strain softening, and steady plastic flow in polymer glasses under constant strain rate deformation

    Chen, K.; Schweizer, K. S., Theory of yielding, strain softening, and steady plastic flow in polymer glasses under constant strain rate deformation. Macromolecules 2011, 44 (10), 3988-4000

    2011

  30. [38]

    S.; Stamm, R.; Lee, E.; Caruthers, J

    Chen, K.; Schweizer, K. S.; Stamm, R.; Lee, E.; Caruthers, J. M., Theory of nonlinear creep in polymer glasses. The Journal of chemical physics 2008, 129 (18), 184904

    2008

  31. [39]

    S., Theory of aging, rejuvenation, and the nonequilibrium steady state in deformed polymer glasses

    Chen, K.; Schweizer, K. S., Theory of aging, rejuvenation, and the nonequilibrium steady state in deformed polymer glasses. Physical Review E 2010, 82 (4), 041804

    2010

  32. [40]

    Macromolecules 2019, 52 (21), 8177-8186

    Ricci, J.; Bennin, T.; Xing, E.; Ediger, M., Linear Stress Relaxation and Probe Reorientation: Comparison of the Segmental Dynamics of Two Glassy Polymers during Physical Aging. Macromolecules 2019, 52 (21), 8177-8186

    2019

  33. [41]

    M.; Bonn, D., On different ways of measuring “the” yield stress

    Dinkgreve, M.; Paredes, J.; Denn, M. M.; Bonn, D., On different ways of measuring “the” yield stress. Journal of non-Newtonian fluid mechanics 2016, 238, 233-241

    2016

  34. [42]

    F.; Ediger, M., Dye reorientation as a probe of stress-induced mobility in polymer glasses

    Lee, H.-N.; Paeng, K.; Swallen, S. F.; Ediger, M., Dye reorientation as a probe of stress-induced mobility in polymer glasses. The Journal of chemical physics 2008, 128 (13), 134902

    2008

  35. [43]

    Macromolecules 2018, 51 (19), 7785-7793

    Ricci, J.; Bennin, T.; Ediger, M., Direct Comparison of Probe Reorientation and Linear Mechanical Measurements of Segmental Dynamics in Glassy Poly (methyl methacrylate). Macromolecules 2018, 51 (19), 7785-7793

    2018

  36. [44]

    -N.; Ediger, M., Mechanical rejuvenation in poly (methyl methacrylate) glasses? Molecular mobility after deformation

    Lee, H. -N.; Ediger, M., Mechanical rejuvenation in poly (methyl methacrylate) glasses? Molecular mobility after deformation. Macromolecules 2010, 43 (13), 5863-5873

    2010

  37. [45]

    F.; Ediger, M., Direct measurement of molecular mobility in actively deformed polymer glasses

    Lee, H.-N.; Paeng, K.; Swallen, S. F.; Ediger, M., Direct measurement of molecular mobility in actively deformed polymer glasses. Science 2009, 323 (5911), 231-234

    2009

  38. [46]

    Macromolecules 2017, 50 (3), 1016-1026

    Hebert, K.; Ediger, M., Reversing strain deformation probes mechanisms for enhanced segmental mobility of polymer glasses. Macromolecules 2017, 50 (3), 1016-1026

    2017

  39. [47]

    Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 1996, 34 (17), 2853-2861

    Hwang, Y.; Ediger, M., Enhanced translational diffusion of rubrene and tetracene in polysulfone. Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 1996, 34 (17), 2853-2861

    1996

  40. [48]

    -Y.; Ediger, M., Enhanced translational diffusion of 9, 10 -bis (phenylethynyl) anthracene (BPEA) in polystyrene

    Wang, C. -Y.; Ediger, M., Enhanced translational diffusion of 9, 10 -bis (phenylethynyl) anthracene (BPEA) in polystyrene. Macromolecules 1997, 30 (16), 4770-4771

    1997

  41. [49]

    T.; Ediger, M., Molecular motions and viscoelasticity of amorphous polymers near Tg

    Inoue, T.; Cicerone, M. T.; Ediger, M., Molecular motions and viscoelasticity of amorphous polymers near Tg. Macromolecules 1995, 28 (9), 3425-3433

    1995

  42. [50]

    J., Probing segmental dynamics of polymer glasses during tensile deformation with dielectric spectroscopy

    Kalfus, J.; Detwiler, A.; Lesser, A. J., Probing segmental dynamics of polymer glasses during tensile deformation with dielectric spectroscopy. Macromolecules 2012, 45 (11), 4839-4847

    2012

  43. [51]

    -Y.; Long, D

    Perez-Aparicio, R.; Cottinet, D.; Crauste -Thibierge, C.; Vanel, L.; Sotta, P.; Delannoy, J. -Y.; Long, D. R.; Ciliberto, S., Dielectric spectroscopy of a stretched polymer glass: heterogeneous dynamics and plasticity. Macromolecules 2016, 49 (10), 3889-3898

    2016

  44. [52]

    S., Derivation of a microscopic theory of barriers and activated hopping transport in glassy liquids and suspensions

    Schweizer, K. S., Derivation of a microscopic theory of barriers and activated hopping transport in glassy liquids and suspensions. The Journal of chemical physics 2005, 123 (24), 244501

    2005

  45. [53]

    S.; Saltzman, E

    Schweizer, K. S.; Saltzman, E. J., Theory of dynamic barriers, activated hopping, and the glass transition in polymer melts. The Journal of chemical physics 2004, 121 (4), 1984-2000

    2004

  46. [54]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 145 (6), 064505

    Rottler, J., Relaxation times in deformed polymer glasses: A comparison between molecular simulations and two theories. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 145 (6), 064505

    2016

  47. [55]

    D., Segmental Dynamics in the Strain-Hardening Regime for Poly(methyl methacrylate) Glasses with and without Melt Stretching

    Xing, E.; Bennin, T.; Razavi, M.; Ediger, M. D., Segmental Dynamics in the Strain-Hardening Regime for Poly(methyl methacrylate) Glasses with and without Melt Stretching. Macromolecules 2022. 23

    2022

  48. [56]

    A.; Xing, E.; Ediger, M

    Medvedev, G. A.; Xing, E.; Ediger, M. D.; Caruthers, J. M., Multistep Deformation Experiment and Development of a Model for the Mechanical Behavior of Polymeric Glasses. Macromolecules 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    The Journal of chemical physics 1936, 4 (4), 283-291

    Eyring, H., Viscosity, plasticity, and diffusion as examples of absolute reaction rates. The Journal of chemical physics 1936, 4 (4), 283-291

    1936

  50. [58]

    A.; Caruthers, J

    Medvedev, G. A.; Caruthers, J. M., Development of a stochastic constitutive model for prediction of postyield softening in glassy polymers. Journal of Rheology 2013, 57 (3), 949-1002

    2013

  51. [59]

    S., Microscopic constitutive equation theory for the nonlinear mechanical response of polymer glasses

    Chen, K.; Schweizer, K. S., Microscopic constitutive equation theory for the nonlinear mechanical response of polymer glasses. Macromolecules 2008, 41 (15), 5908-5918

    2008

  52. [60]

    A.; Schweizer, K

    Riggleman, R. A.; Schweizer, K. S.; de Pablo, J. J., Nonlinear creep in a polymer glass. Macromolecules 2008, 41 (13), 4969-4977

    2008

  53. [61]

    V., Slow relaxation dynamics in binary glasses during stress -controlled, tension - compression cyclic loading

    Priezjev, N. V., Slow relaxation dynamics in binary glasses during stress -controlled, tension - compression cyclic loading. Computational Materials Science 2018, 153, 235-240

    2018

  54. [62]

    Phys Rev E 2020, 101 (1-1), 012603

    Schinasi-Lemberg, E.; Regev, I., Annealing and rejuvenation in a two -dimensional model amorphous solid under oscillatory shear. Phys Rev E 2020, 101 (1-1), 012603

    2020

  55. [63]

    Physical Review Letters 2020, 124 (22)

    Yeh, W.-T.; Ozawa, M.; Miyazaki, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Berthier, L., Glass Stability Changes the Nature of Yielding under Oscillatory Shear. Physical Review Letters 2020, 124 (22)

    2020

  56. [64]

    ArXiv 2019, (arXiv:1911.12957 [cond-mat.dis-nn])

    Bhaumik, H.; Foffie, G.; Sastry, S., The role of annealing in determining the yield behavior of glasses during cyclic shear deformation. ArXiv 2019, (arXiv:1911.12957 [cond-mat.dis-nn])

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    J., Stress aging in anhydrous nylon 6 –10

    Kramer, E. J., Stress aging in anhydrous nylon 6 –10. Journal of Applied Physics 1970, 41 (11), 4327- 4341

    1970

  58. [66]

    M., Heat treatment of precipitation hardening alloys

    Liu, J.; Kersker, M. M., Heat treatment of precipitation hardening alloys. Google Patents: 1992

    1992

  59. [67]

    Google Patents: 1914

    Wilm, A., Process of improving alloys. Google Patents: 1914

    1914

  60. [68]

    Defense, D

    R H, H., Stress -aging: A new treatment for alloys, part one: Effect on standard tensile properties of stainless steels. Defense, D. o., Ed. Department of Defence: Defense Technical Infromation Center 1963

    1963

  61. [69]

    Defense, D

    R H, H., Stress -aging: A new treatment for alloys, part two: Effect on standard tensile properties of 4330 type steel. Defense, D. o., Ed. Defense Technical Infromation Center: 1964

    1964

  62. [70]

    Effect on standard tensile properties of four ultra-high-strength steels

    R H, H., Stress -aging: A new treatment for alloys, part three. Effect on standard tensile properties of four ultra-high-strength steels. Defense, D. o., Ed. Defense Technical Infromation Center: 1965

    1965

  63. [71]

    Q., Double yielding in deformation of semicrystalline polymers

    Razavi, M.; Wang, S. Q., Double yielding in deformation of semicrystalline polymers. Macromolecular chemistry and physics 2020, 221 (19), 2000151

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.