Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 38 references

Type-II Mirror Chern Insulator in Altermagnets

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Altermagnets can realize a mirror Chern insulator whose protected edge modes sit at different momenta and energies, a phase the authors call type-II mirror Chern insulator.

desk verdict Solid tight-binding calculation, but the 'type-II' label is a boundary-spectral feature of a conventional mirror Chern insulator under TRS-breaking perturbations, not a new topological phase. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07374 v1 pith:35ASZN7E submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Amrita Mukherjee , Pritesh Srivastava , Rahul Verma , Bahadur Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetismmirrorCherninsulatortype-IIsquare-octagonlatticespin-orbitcouplingvalley-selectivebandinversionproximityeffectPbSe/V2Se2Oheterobilayer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that a two-dimensional altermagnet with an out-of-plane mirror symmetry and spin-orbit coupling can realize a mirror Chern insulator with mirror Chern number $C_{\mathcal{M}}=2$. In this phase, altermagnetic spin splitting and valley-selective band inversion separate the two mirror-protected edge modes into symmetry-related valleys, so their crossings occur at different momenta and energies rather than at a single Dirac cone. The prediction is supported by a square-octagon tight-binding model and a proposed PbSe/V2Se2O heterobilayer, where the altermagnetic proximity effect transfers valley-selective spin splitting into the PbSe layer. This matters because it identifies a new boundary phase, the type-II mirror Chern insulator, and a concrete material platform for observing it.

What carries the argument

The central object is the mirror Chern number $C_{\mathcal{M}}=(C_{+i}-C_{-i})/2$, defined in the $\mathcal{M}_{001}=\pm i$ mirror eigensectors and computed through Wilson-loop evolution of Wannier charge centers. The mechanism that carries the argument is the combination of d-wave altermagnetic spin splitting, enforced by the spin-lattice symmetry $[C_2\parallel C_{4z}]$, and valley-selective band inversion: the exchange field reverses the valence-conduction ordering between the $X$ and $Y$ valleys, producing four Dirac nodes with winding number $\pm 1$ that spin-orbit coupling gaps while preserving the mirror eigenvalues. It is this reconstruction of the edge-state connectivity that separates the mirror-protected crossings into different momenta.

What would settle it

Measure the edge spectrum of the proposed PbSe/V2Se2O heterobilayer with angle-resolved photoemission or scanning tunnelling spectroscopy: if the two mirror-protected crossings appear at the same momentum, forming a single Dirac cone, or if a first-principles calculation that includes a symmetry-breaking substrate finds gapped edges, the type-II classification is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that altermagnetic order, a collinear magnetic state with zero net magnetization but momentum-dependent spin splitting, combined with spin-orbit coupling transforms four valley-polarized Dirac nodes in a square-octagon lattice into a mirror Chern insulator with $C_{\mathcal{M}}=2$. The Hamiltonian decomposes into mirror sectors with eigenvalues $\pm i$ whose Chern numbers are $C_{+i}=2$ and $C_{-i}=-2$, so the mirror Chern number $C_{\mathcal{M}}=(C_{+i}-C_{-i})/2=2$. The defining boundary signature is that the two counterpropagating edge modes with opposite mirror eigenvalues no longer cross at the band-inversion momentum; instead, the altermagnetic exchange reconstructs their connectivity so the crossings appear at distinct momenta and energies, forming electron-like and hole-like edge pockets. The paper proposes the PbSe/V2Se2O heterobilayer, where proximity transfers the altermagnetic exchange into the PbSe mirror Chern insulator, as a realistic platform.

Load-bearing premise

The protected boundary spectrum requires the out-of-plane mirror symmetry $\mathcal{M}_{001}$ to remain exact in a real device, so any strain, surface reconstruction, or substrate hybridization that breaks this mirror will destroy the type-II edge crossings even if the bulk bands look similar.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A square-octagon lattice altermagnet with spin-orbit coupling stably realizes a mirror Chern insulator with $C_{\mathcal{M}}=2$, confirmed by Wilson-loop invariants and ribbon edge spectra.
  • The two mirror-protected edge modes are separated into symmetry-related valleys: their crossings appear at distinct momenta and energies, producing electron-like and hole-like edge pockets instead of a single Fermi-level Dirac cone.
  • The $C_{\mathcal{M}}=2$ phase occupies a broad region of the $(t_2,\delta_m)$ phase diagram and transitions to a trivial insulator when the altermagnetic exchange field exceeds a critical value, so the topology is tunable.
  • In the proposed PbSe/V2Se2O heterobilayer, proximity transfers altermagnetic spin splitting into the PbSe layer while preserving its band inversion and mirror Chern number, yielding the type-II edge spectrum.
  • Altermagnetism is thereby established as a general route to mirror-protected topological phases with momentum-separated edge modes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism should generalize to any two-dimensional altermagnet with an out-of-plane mirror plane and spin-orbit coupling, so other d-wave altermagnets with $X$/$Y$ valley structure are natural candidate hosts.
  • Because the edge channels are spin-valley locked and separated in momentum, the boundary of a type-II mirror Chern insulator could act as a valley-selective or spin-selective one-way channel, a property not present in conventional mirror Chern insulators.
  • A weak breaking of the mirror symmetry should gap the type-II edge crossings, making the edge spectrum a sensitive local probe of mirror-symmetry breaking by strain or a substrate.
  • In multilayer or interfaced stacks, the momentum separation between edge modes could enable switchable transport controlled by the altermagnetic order direction, since the valley asymmetry is tied to the spin-lattice symmetry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a tight-binding model of a two-dimensional square-octagon lattice with altermagnetic exchange and spin-orbit coupling, preserving an out-of-plane mirror symmetry M001. It shows that SOC gaps the altermagnetic Dirac nodes and yields a mirror Chern number C_M=2, confirmed by Wilson loops and ribbon edge spectra. The central new claim is that, unlike a conventional mirror Chern insulator, the two counterpropagating edge modes with opposite mirror eigenvalues cross away from time-reversal-invariant momenta, forming separate electron- and hole-like edge pockets. The authors call this boundary spectrum a 'type-II mirror Chern insulator' and propose a PbSe/V2Se2O heterobilayer as a material realization, using DFT to show proximity-induced altermagnetic spin splitting in PbSe.

Significance. The model is explicit and the topological invariant is computed by standard Wilson-loop and edge-state methods, which is a strength. If the 'type-II' label is reinterpreted as a boundary spectral feature rather than a distinct topological phase, the paper provides a clear example of how altermagnetic order can reshape the edge spectrum of a mirror Chern insulator without changing its bulk invariant. The material proposal is suggestive but lacks an edge-state demonstration. Overall, the technical content is sound but the interpretation as a new phase overstates the results.

major comments (3)
  1. [Type-II mirror Chern insulator (Figs. 2 and 3)] The central claim that the type-II edge spectrum constitutes a distinct topological phase is not supported. The bulk invariant C_M=2 is identical for δm=0 and δm=0.4, and the phase diagram in Fig. 3(b) shows that the C_M=2 region is connected and extends to δm=0 without a bulk gap closing; within the same symmetry group (M001 preserved), these states are adiabatically connected. Moreover, any M001-preserving time-reversal-breaking perturbation, such as a uniform Zeeman term Bσ_z (which commutes with M001), would generically move the edge-mode crossings away from the Γ and X points in a conventional mirror Chern insulator. The momentum-separated crossings are therefore a boundary spectral feature, not a distinctive bulk phase, and the feature is not exclusive to altermagnetism. I recommend that the authors either provide a bulk invariant or quantized response that distinguishes the type-II state, or rewrite the Abstract, Fig. 3(c), and Summary to describe the result as a boundary spectrum of the mirror Chern insulator phase.
  2. [Possible material realization (Fig. 4)] The DFT section does not establish the type-II phase. Fig. 4 shows bulk band structure only: proximity-induced spin splitting in PbSe and preserved band inversion. No slab or edge-state calculation is presented, so the claim that the heterobilayer is expected to separate the mirror-protected edge modes (final paragraph of this section) is a conjecture. In addition, the interlayer separation d=3.5 Å is the only value considered; the assumption that weak interlayer coupling transfers the altermagnetic exchange without destroying the PbSe band inversion is not tested for robustness. The authors should either compute the heterobilayer edge spectrum or explicitly label the material part as a proposal subject to future verification.
  3. [Phase diagram and tunability (Fig. 3)] The paper does not define a quantitative criterion for the type-II regime. Comparing Figs. 2(d) and 2(f), the edge spectrum evolves continuously with δm, and no order parameter or invariant marks the onset of the type-II pattern. The one parameter set shown (δm=0.4, λ_SOC=0.24, t2=0.8) is not mapped across the C_M=2 region, so the reader cannot tell whether the type-II boundary spectrum is a stable feature or a fine-tuned artifact. A definition of type-II, such as the position of the crossings relative to the Fermi level or the emergence of electron/hole pockets, should be given and its parameter dependence shown.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 2(c) caption] The caption uses 'Mz = ±i' whereas the text and the rest of the paper use M001; please use a single symbol consistently.
  2. [Tight-binding model, after Eq. (4)] The spin-rotation operation C2 in the notation [C2∥C4z] is not defined; please specify that it is a π rotation of the spin about an axis perpendicular to the magnetization direction.
  3. [Fig. 3(b)] The axes in the phase diagram are not labeled with units; add labels in terms of t1 (e.g., δm/t1 and t2/t1).
  4. [References] Reference [31] for the Supplemental Material contains a placeholder 'Refs. [ ? ? ? ]' that should be completed before publication.
  5. [Altermagnetic spin splitting and Dirac nodes, around Fig. 1(d)] The sentence 'Further increasing δm annihilates the Dirac nodes and opens a full bulk gap' should specify 'for δm>0.8' since the gap closes at δm=0.8.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mirror Chern number and edge spectra are computed directly from the explicitly given Hamiltonian, and the material proposal rests on independent prior results.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. The Bloch Hamiltonian is written out in full in Eq. (5) with explicit hopping, SOC, and altermagnetic-exchange terms; the mirror Chern number C_M = 2 is obtained from a Wilson-loop calculation of the Wannier charge centers in the M_001 = ±i sectors, and the edge spectra are computed directly for ribbon geometries. No parameter is fitted to a target result and then renamed as a prediction; the model parameters (t1 = 1, t2 = 0.8, δm = 0.2–1.1, λSOC = 0.24) are illustrative, and the topological invariant is calculated, not imposed. The altermagnetic exchange δm is an input that generates valley-polarized Dirac nodes and, with SOC, momentum-separated edge modes; describing this resulting boundary spectrum as a 'type-II mirror Chern insulator' is a naming choice, not a circular derivation, because the spectral features are computed rather than assumed. The material proposal depends on independent prior claims that monolayer PbSe is a mirror Chern insulator [34] and that V2Se2O is a d-wave altermagnet [35–37]; the same-authors citations [26,29,38] are contextual and not load-bearing, since the lattice model is fully specified in the text and the AV2X2O discussion is corroborated by external references. The skeptical concern that the type-II label overstates a distinction from the conventional mirror Chern insulator is a correctness or interpretation issue, not a circularity: the computation genuinely produces the stated edge modes. No load-bearing self-citation chain, fitted-input-as-prediction, or self-definitional reduction was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central model is self-contained apart from hand-chosen parameters; the material proposal imports published band topologies. No external benchmark is used for the mirror Chern number, and no fitted parameter is labeled as a prediction.

free parameters (4)
  • intercell hopping t2/t1 = 0.8
    Chosen to place the square-octagon model in the desired topological regime; not fitted to any real material.
  • altermagnetic exchange δm/t1 = 0.4 for CM=2 phase; 0.8 at critical gap closing
    Chosen to display the topological phase and the transition to the trivial insulator.
  • spin-orbit coupling λSOC/t1 = 0.24
    Chosen to open the Dirac-node gaps; other values would shift the phase boundaries and edge spectra.
  • PbSe/V2Se2O interlayer separation d = 3.5 Å
    Chosen to realize a weak-coupling proximity effect; no structural relaxation or stability check is shown.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption M001 mirror symmetry is preserved by the altermagnetic order and the full Hamiltonian.
    Required for the mirror Chern number and the protected edge crossings; stated before Eq. (1) and used in Eq. (5) and Fig. 2(b).
  • domain assumption PbSe monolayer is a two-dimensional mirror Chern insulator with CM=2.
    The material proposal inherits this from Ref. [34]; it is not recomputed here.
  • domain assumption V2Se2O monolayer is a d-wave altermagnet with valley-selective spin splitting.
    Inherited from Refs. [35-37]; used as the exchange-field source in the heterobilayer calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper Weak interlayer coupling at d=3.5 Å transfers altermagnetic exchange to PbSe without destroying the band inversion.
    The DFT section fixes the separation and interprets the resulting band asymmetry as preserving topology, but no edge spectrum or stability check is provided.
  • domain assumption Intrinsic Kane-Mele SOC is the only spin-orbit coupling in the model.
    Rashba or interface SOC could alter the edge connectivity; this enters through Eq. (3).
invented entities (1)
  • type-II mirror Chern insulator
    purpose: Label for the altermagnetic mirror Chern insulator whose two protected edge crossings are separated in momentum and energy.
    Evidence is confined to the model edge spectra in Figs. 2(d), 2(e), and 3(c); no independent experimental detection is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Type-II Mirror Chern Insulator in Altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/35ASZN7E

@misc{pith2026260807374,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Type-II Mirror Chern Insulator in Altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/35ASZN7E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07374}
}
abstract

Altermagnets with momentum-dependent spin splitting despite zero net magnetization can support unique topological states under broken time-reversal symmetry. We predict a mirror-symmetry-protected topological crystalline insulator with momentum-separated edge modes in a two-dimensional altermagnet. Using a square-octagon lattice model, we show that altermagnetic order generates symmetry-related valley-polarized Dirac nodes, which are gapped by spin-orbit coupling to yield a mirror Chern insulator with $C_{\mathcal{M}}=2$. In contrast to conventional mirror Chern insulators, where the two mirror-protected edge modes cross at the same momentum to form a Dirac cone, altermagnetic spin splitting and valley-selective band inversion separate these edge modes in momentum. We refer to this phase as a type-II mirror Chern insulator. We further propose a PbSe/$\mathrm{V_2Se_2O}$ heterobilayer as a candidate material for realizing this phase through the altermagnetic proximity effect. Our results establish altermagnetism as a route to mirror-protected topological phases with momentum-separated edge modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07374 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Square-octagon lattice with altermagnetic order. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Spin-resolved band structure with SOC for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Bulk band structure with SOC as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Crystal structure of the PbSe/V [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Singh, H

    B. Singh, H. Lin, and A. Bansil, Topology and symmetry in quantum materials, Adv. Mater. 35, 2201058 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys

    L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 106802 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    T. H. Hsieh, H. Lin, J. Liu, W. Duan, A. Bansil, and L. Fu, Topological crystalline insulators in the SnTe ma- terial class, Nat. Commun. 3, 982 (2012)

    2012

  4. [4]

    S.-Y. Xu, C. Liu, N. Alidoust, M. Neupane, D. Qian, I. Belopolski, J. Denlinger, Y. Wang, H. Lin, L. a. Wray, et al. , Observation of a topological crystalline insulator phase and topological phase transition in Pb (1−x)SnxTe, Nat. Commun. 3, 1192 (2012)

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Shiozaki and M

    K. Shiozaki and M. Sato, Topology of crystalline insu- lators and superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 90, 165114 (2014)

    2014

  6. [6]

    C. Niu, P. M. Buhl, G. Bihlmayer, D. Wortmann, S. Blugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Two-dimensional topologi- cal crystalline insulator and topological phase transition in TlSe and TlS monolayers, Nano Lett. 15, 6071 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Khalaf, H

    E. Khalaf, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and H. Watanabe, Symmetry indicators and anomalous surface states of topological crystalline insulators, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031070 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    B. Wang, B. Singh, B. Ghosh, W.-C. Chiu, M. M. Ho- sen, Q. Zhang, L. Ying, M. Neupane, A. Agarwal, H. Lin, and A. Bansil, Topological crystalline insulator state with type-II Dirac fermions in transition metal dipnictides, Phys. Rev. B 100, 205118 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang and C.-X

    R.-X. Zhang and C.-X. Liu, Topological magnetic crys- talline insulators and corepresentation theory, Phys. Rev. B 91, 115317 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Fang and L

    C. Fang and L. Fu, New classes of three-dimensional topological crystalline insulators: Nonsymmorphic and magnetic, Phys. Rev. B 91, 161105(R) (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    A. B. Sarkar, S. Mardanya, S.-M. Huang, B. Ghosh, C.- Y. Huang, H. Lin, A. Bansil, T.-R. Chang, A. Agar- wal, and B. Singh, Magnetically tunable Dirac and Weyl fermions in the Zintl materials family, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, 044204 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Xu, Z.-D

    Y. Xu, Z.-D. Song, Z. Wang, H. Weng, and X. Dai, Higher-order topology of the axion insulator EuIn 2as2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 256402 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    S. X. Riberolles, T. V. Trevisan, B. Kuthanazhi, T. Heit- mann, F. Ye, D. Johnston, S. Bud’ko, D. Ryan, P. Can- field, A. Kreyssig, et al., Magnetic crystalline-symmetry- protected axion electrodynamics and field-tunable un- pinned Dirac cones in EuIn 2As2, Nat. Commun. 12, 999 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    J. Li, Y. Li, S. Du, Z. Wang, B. Gu, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, W. Duan, and Y. Xu, Magnetically controllable topolog- ical quantum phase transitions in the antiferromagnetic topological insulator MnBi 2Te4, Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw5685 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    C. Hu, L. Ding, K. N. Gordon, B. Ghosh, H.-J. Tien, H. Li, A. G. Linn, S.-W. Lien, C.-Y. Huang, S. Mackey, et al. , Realization of an intrinsic ferromagnetic topologi- cal state in MnBi 8Te13, Sci. Adv. 6, eaba4275 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X 12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B 110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    D¨ urrnagel, H

    M. D¨ urrnagel, H. Hohmann, A. Maity, J. Seufert, M. Klett, L. Klebl, and R. Thomale, Altermagnetic phase transition in a Lieb metal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 036502 6 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    X. Zhu, X. Huo, S. Feng, S.-B. Zhang, S. A. Yang, and H. Guo, Design of altermagnetic models from spin clus- ters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 166701 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, R. M. Fernandes, Q. Liu, H. Watanabe, S. Murakami, S. Nakatsuji, and L.ˇSmejkal, Symmetry, microscopy and spectroscopy signatures of al- termagnetism, Nature 649, 837 (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. Venderbos, Mirror Chern bands and Weyl nodal loops in altermag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 096703 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Feng, C.-Y

    P. Feng, C.-Y. Tan, M. Gao, X.-W. Yan, Z.-X. Liu, P.-J. Guo, F. Ma, and Z.-Y. Lu, Type-II quantum spin Hall insulator, arXiv:2503.13397 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Q. Hu, X. Cheng, Q. Duan, Y. Hu, B. Jiang, Y. Xiao, Y. Li, M. Pan, L. Deng, C. Liu, et al. , Observation of spin-valley locked nodal lines in a quasi-2d altermagnet, arXiv:2601.02883 (2026)

    2026

  18. [26]

    Srivastava, R

    P. Srivastava, R. Verma, and B. Singh, Isolation of spin- valley locked nodal-line fermions in d-wave AV2X2O al- termagnets, arXiv:2607.26150 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Jungwirth, J

    T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, P. Wadley, D. Kriegner, H. Re- ichlova, F. Krizek, H. Ohno, and L. ˇSmejkal, Altermag- netic spintronics, Nat. Phys. 22, 1012 (2026)

    2026

  20. [28]

    K. F. Mak, K. L. McGill, J. Park, and P. L. McEuen, The valley Hall effect in MoS 2 transistors, Science 344, 1489 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Mukherjee, R

    A. Mukherjee, R. Verma, P. Srivastava, and B. Singh, Topologically nontrivial flat bands and quantum Hall crossovers in square-octagon lattice materials, Phys. Rev. B 113, 235420 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum spin Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    [ ? ? ? ]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for supporting details and discussions, which includes Refs. [ ? ? ? ]

  24. [32]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 109 (2009)

    2009

  25. [33]

    Z. Zhu, R. Huang, X. Chen, Z. Cui, X. Duan, J. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Altermagnetic proximity effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 186702 (2026)

    2026

  26. [34]

    E. O. Wrasse and T. M. Schmidt, Prediction of two- dimensional topological crystalline insulator in PbSe monolayer, Nano Lett. 14, 5717 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, et al. , A metallic room- temperature d-wave altermagnet, Nat. Phys. 21, 754 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, et al., Crystal-symmetry- paired spin–valley locking in a layered room-temperature metallic altermagnet candidate, Nat. Phys. 21, 760 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    J.-Y. Zhan, R. He, D. Wang, M.-D. He, N. Luo, J. Zeng, K.-Q. Chen, and L.-M. Tang, Multiphysics field driven valley polarization in tetragonal altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 112, 024408 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Verma, Y

    R. Verma, Y. Vardhan, H. Lin, and B. Singh, Emergent spin Hall quantization and high-order van Hove singu- larities in square-octagonal MA 2Z4, Adv. Phys. Res. 5, e00213 (2026)

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.