Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 106 references

Ferroelectric-controllable spin-orbit torque in two-dimensional multiferroic heterostructure

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In a Fe3GeTe2/In2Se3 van der Waals heterostructure, reversing the In2Se3 ferroelectric polarization boosts the in-plane spin-orbit torkance to more than 150% (170-180%) of its original value.

desk verdict A solid first-principles prediction of ferroelectric-controlled SOT in Fe3GeTe2/In2Se3, with a plausible Gamma-point mechanism; the quantitative headline depends on a band alignment that LDA alone does not validate. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07731 v1 pith:TKM7YMV2 submitted 2026-08-07 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Weiyi Pan , Gusthavo M.S. Brizolla , Jaroslav Fabian This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords spin-orbittorquetorkanceferroelectriccontrolvanderWaalsheterostructureFe3GeTe2In2Se3Fermisurfacereconstructionfirst-principlescalculation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper predicts that in a two-dimensional van der Waals heterostructure made of the ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2 and the ferroelectric In2Se3, flipping the ferroelectric polarization of In2Se3 changes the strength of the current-induced spin-orbit torque. When the magnetization lies in the plane, where the torque is largest, reversing the polarization from up to down raises the total torkance (torque per electric field) to about 170-180% of its original value. The change is dominated by the time-reversal-odd, field-like component of the torkance, and the largest atomic contribution comes from the middle Fe layer, which grows by roughly 233%. The microscopic origin is a polarization-driven reconstruction of the Fermi surface near the $\Gamma$ point, where an Fe3GeTe2-derived hole pocket turns into an In2Se3-derived electron pocket. If the prediction holds, ferroelectric switching becomes a nonvolatile, electrical control knob for spin-orbit torque in all-van der Waals spintronic devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the torkance tensor $\boldsymbol{\tau}$, which relates the current-induced torque to the applied electric field. Calculated from a Wannier Hamiltonian by linear-response Kubo formulas, it splits into a time-reversal-even interband part (damping-like) and a time-reversal-odd intraband part (field-like), with the latter dominating here. The analysis then decomposes $\tau^{\mathrm{odd}}_{zx}$ in momentum space (momentum-resolved torkance arcs around $\Gamma$) and by atomic site; the load-bearing step is the Fermi-surface reconstruction in which polarization-down brings In2Se3-derived bands down to hybridize with Fe3GeTe2 states and converts a hole pocket into an In2Se3-derived electron pocket. That pocket's all-negative arc-like torkance contributions are what make the total torkance grow.

What would settle it

Angle-resolved photoemission on a poled Fe3GeTe2/In2Se3 stack should show the predicted reconstruction of the Fermi surface near the $\Gamma$ point from a Fe3GeTe2-derived hole pocket (polarization up) to an In2Se3-derived electron pocket (polarization down); if the pocket conversion is absent, the 170-180% torkance enhancement would not occur as calculated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors show that the Fe3GeTe2/In2Se3 heterobilayer, which has $C_{3v}$ symmetry and therefore supports a finite torkance even for out-of-plane magnetization, acquires a strongly polarization-dependent torkance. With the current along $+x$ and the magnetization in the $x$-$y$ plane, switching In2Se3 from the upward to the downward polarization state increases the total torkance by about 0.22-0.30 $e a_0$, reaching approximately 170-180% of the upward-state value. The dominant component is the $z$-directed time-reversal-odd torkance $\tau^{\mathrm{odd}}_{zx}$, which is field-like and about an order of magnitude larger than the time-reversal-even part; its change is carried mainly by the middle Fe layer (Fe2), whose atom-resolved contribution grows from -0.09 to -0.30 $e a_0$, a 233% increase. The mechanism is a Fermi-surface reconstruction near $\Gamma$: in the polarization-down state the In2Se3-derived bands shift downward and hybridize with Fe3GeTe2 states, converting the Fe3GeTe2 hole pocket into an In2Se3-derived electron pocket whose momentum-resolved torkance arcs are all negative and add to $\tau^{\mathrm{odd}}_{zx}$.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the local-density-approximation energy alignment between the Fe3GeTe2 and In2Se3 bands near the $\Gamma$ point; if a more accurate treatment shifts those bands so that the polarization-down state no longer converts the Fe3GeTe2 hole pocket into an In2Se3 electron pocket, the 150% enhancement could shrink or change sign.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In-plane magnetization is where both the torque and its ferroelectric modulation are largest, so devices exploiting this effect should be designed with the magnetization along the $x$ direction.
  • Because the time-reversal-odd, field-like component dominates, the enhanced torque acts as an effective magnetic field that drives precession rather than as a damping-like torque that relaxes the magnetization.
  • The middle Fe layer (Fe2) is the active magnetic site, so tuning its local environment through stacking, strain, or intercalation should be the most direct way to engineer the effect.
  • The mechanism requires In2Se3-derived bands near $\Gamma$ to cross the Fermi level on polarization reversal, which gives a concrete band-structure criterion for screening other ferroelectric/ferromagnet pairs for switchable spin-orbit torque.
  • Since the two polarization states are nonvolatile, the same device can store a state and read it out through the torque magnitude, offering a route to programmable logic without continuous power.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported percentages are torkance ratios at fixed electric field; the current-density ratio could differ because polarization switching also changes the conductivity, so device-level energy efficiency needs a separate transport estimate.
  • The band-alignment mechanism suggests a screening rule the authors do not state: any ferroelectric whose bands can be pushed through the Fermi level of a two-dimensional ferromagnet by polarization reversal should show a similar torque modulation, not just In2Se3.
  • A direct test is to measure the $\Gamma$-point Fermi pocket by angle-resolved photoemission on poled samples: the predicted hole-to-electron pocket conversion should be visible before any torque measurement.
  • The authors' finding that atom-resolved Edelstein and torkance responses do not track each other implies that spin-accumulation or spin-current probes alone would underestimate the torque change; only torque measurements (for example harmonic Hall) would reveal the 170-180% effect.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles calculations of the spin-orbit torkance in a Fe3GeTe2/In2Se3 heterobilayer for the two polarization states of the In2Se3 layer. Using DFT with LDA, Wannier interpolation, and Kubo linear response (Eqs. 2–5), the authors find that switching the In2Se3 polarization from up to down increases the total in-plane torkance to about 170–180% of its up-polarization value, dominated by the time-reversal-odd τ_zx component and by a 233% increase in the Fe2 atom-resolved contribution. They interpret this as a polarization-induced Fermi-surface reconstruction near Γ, where an Fe3GeTe2-derived hole pocket is converted into an In2Se3-derived electron pocket. The paper also presents atom-resolved Edelstein responses and argues that atom-resolved torkance cannot be inferred directly from Edelstein coefficients.

Significance. If correct, the prediction establishes an all-van-der-Waals multiferroic heterostructure in which ferroelectric polarization nonvolatilely controls SOT, with a concrete microscopic mechanism. The strengths of the paper are its clearly specified computational parameters (18×18×1 relaxation mesh, 600×600 torkance mesh, 90/800 Ry cutoffs, Γ=0.01 eV), the Wannier-interpolated k-resolved and atom-resolved decompositions, and the Edelstein cross-check. The calculation is not circular: the torkance is computed from first-principles Wannier Hamiltonians and the broadening is taken from prior work rather than fitted to the target enhancement. The main risk is the unvalidated LDA band alignment on which the pocket conversion near Γ rests.

major comments (2)
  1. [III.C and Figs. 6(c,d)] The central quantitative claim — that polarization reversal raises the in-plane total torkance to 170–180% of its up-state value — is tied to the band reconstruction at Γ described in Section III.C and shown in Figs. 6(c,d). The mechanism requires the In2Se3-derived bands to shift downward enough to anticross with Fe3GeTe2-derived bands and convert a hole pocket into an electron pocket. This ordering is computed with LDA, and the paper provides no validation of the heterostructure band alignment (e.g., HSE06 or DFT+U calculation, or comparison with photoemission). Since LDA is known to misplace semiconductor band edges by several tenths of an eV, and since a moderate error of order 0.1–0.2 eV could suppress or reverse the pocket conversion, the 150% enhancement and its Fe2 attribution are not yet established beyond the LDA approximation. The authors should either add a band-alignment validation or explicitly reframe the result as LDA-dependent.
  2. [Methods] The angular dependence of the torkance is computed by manually rotating the exchange field H_odd from the +z ground state to arbitrary (θ,φ) without a self-consistent noncollinear calculation. Because the headline result is for in-plane magnetization (θ=90° or φ=0°), the quantitative values of the enhancement depend on the validity of this rigid-rotation approximation. This approximation is common, but it is load-bearing for the claimed 170–180% figure. The authors should report at least one self-consistent noncollinear calculation with the magnetization along the in-plane direction, or otherwise demonstrate that the rigid rotation does not change the electronic structure enough to affect the enhancement.
minor comments (6)
  1. [III.B] In the definition of τ_θx, the text gives τ_θx = τ_xx cosθ − τ_zx sinθ and also states e_θ = (cosθ, 0, sinθ)^T; the torque component along e_θ would be τ_xx cosθ + τ_zx sinθ, so one of the two definitions contains a sign error. Please correct the inconsistency.
  2. [III.D and Fig. 7(b)] The text defines the Edelstein response as χ_even_yx, while the caption of Fig. 7(b) labels it χ_even_zx; these should be reconciled.
  3. [Methods] The sentence “For both calculation calculation of torkance and Edelstein effect” contains a duplicated word.
  4. [Appendix A] The sentence “which is shown in Figs. 9 and 7” appears to reference the wrong figures; the polarization-up and polarization-down stacking energies are shown in Figs. 8 and 9.
  5. [Methods] The definition of the torque operator relies on H_odd, which is only described by reference to the authors' preprint [102]; for a self-contained publication, the essential definition of H_odd and the atom-resolved projection should be stated explicitly.
  6. [Data availability] The manuscript does not include Wannier Hamiltonians, band-structure data, or input files for the two polarization states; providing these (or a data availability statement) would allow independent verification of the critical Γ-point band ordering.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the torkance enhancement is computed from first-principles Wannier Hamiltonians; the 150% and Fe2 numbers are outputs, not fitted inputs.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim, that reversing the In2Se3 polarization raises the in-plane total torkance to about 170-180% of its up-polarization value with a dominant time-reversal-odd τ^odd_zx and a 233% Fe2 change, is a direct output of the Kubo torkance formulas (Eqs. 2-3) evaluated on symmetry-adapted Wannier Hamiltonians. No parameter is tuned to produce the 150% enhancement; the only imported parameter is the broadening Γ=0.01 eV, taken from the authors' own method preprint [102], and the torque-operator plus atom-resolved decomposition is adopted from [102] and [103]. These are tool dependencies, not circular reasoning: [102] does not contain the Fe3GeTe2/In2Se3 result, and the same Hamiltonian yields the full angular, k-resolved, and atom-resolved torkance maps from which the enhancement is read off. The Section III.C band reconstruction at Γ (Fe3GeTe2 hole pocket converting to an In2Se3-derived electron pocket) is presented post hoc as a microscopic explanation consistent with the k-resolved torkance redistribution, not as an input that forces the 150% number. The LDA band-alignment sensitivity raised by the skeptic is a correctness risk about functional choice, not a circularity: no equation defines the enhancement in terms of the band alignment. The only self-referential element is citation of the group's own method preprint for H_odd and the atom-resolved projection, which is not load-bearing for the quantitative claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or dimensions. Its central claim rests on standard linear-response theory, on the validity of LDA for the band alignment near Γ, on the frozen exchange-field approximation for angular dependence, and on the choice of stacking A; the only numerical free parameter is the broadening Γ.

free parameters (1)
  • Broadening Γ = 0.01 eV
    Used in the Kubo torkance and Edelstein formulas; chosen based on previous work [102] to mimic sub-100 fs relaxation; quantitative torkance values depend on it, though the comparative 150% effect is less sensitive.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Kubo-Greenwood linear response formulas for torkance (Eqs. 2 and 3) and Edelstein effect (Eq. 5)
    Adopted from refs [86,92,102]; they are the framework for computing torkance from the Wannier Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption LDA exchange-correlation functional without Hubbard U accurately captures Fe3GeTe2 electronic and magnetic properties
    The paper cites refs [24,37,97] showing LDA works for Fe3GeTe2 magnetism, but the Fermi-surface details that drive the torkance change are not validated against experiment or higher-level theory.
  • domain assumption The exchange field can be rigidly rotated from +z to arbitrary angles for angular-dependent torkance
    Used to generate Figs. 4 and 5; ignores magnetization-direction-dependent modifications of the band structure and hence of the torque operator itself.
  • domain assumption The lowest-energy stacking A is the operative stacking for both polarization states
    Only three C3v-symmetric stackings were compared (Appendix A); other stackings or twist angles could alter the interface and the SOT.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ferroelectric-controllable spin-orbit torque in two-dimensional multiferroic heterostructure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TKM7YMV2

@misc{pith2026260807731,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ferroelectric-controllable spin-orbit torque in two-dimensional multiferroic heterostructure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TKM7YMV2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07731}
}
abstract

Spin-orbit torque (SOT), which enables electrical control of magnetization, plays a crucial role in the development of next-generation spintronic devices. Realizing SOT in two-dimensional van der Waals systems, together with achieving efficient nonvolatile manipulation via ferroelectricity, would be highly beneficial for the implementation of tunable logic devices with enhanced storage density. In this work, based on first-principles calculation and using a multiferroic Fe$_{3}$GeTe$_{2}$/In$_{2}$Se$_{3}$ heterostructure as a representative example, we demonstrate that switching the ferroelectric polarization of the In$_{2}$Se$_{3}$ layer induces a pronounced modification in the magnetization-dependent distribution of torkance within the heterostructure. Specifically, when the magnetization is in the plane, where the torque is maximal, reversing the polarization of In$_{2}$Se$_{3}$ from upward to downward enhances the total torkance to more than 150% of its original value. This substantial variation primarily originates from the polarization-induced modulation of the $z$ component of the time-reversal-odd torkance, which is mainly associated with an approximately 233% change in the atomic-resolved torque contributed from the middle Fe layer in Fe$_{3}$GeTe$_{2}$ layer. Further analysis reveals that the electronic states near $\Gamma$ on the Fermi surface undergo significant reconstruction upon polarization switching, which is responsible for the observed variation in the time-reversal-odd torque. Our results not only provide new insights into the functional potential of van der Waals multiferroic heterostructures, but also offer a viable strategy for achieving electrically tunable SOT, paving the way for future programmable spintronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07731 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) A Schematic illustration of current-induced spin-orbit torque in FM/NM heterostructure system. A longitudinal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Atomic structure of Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The calculated density of states for Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Angular-dependent torkance when magnetization rotating in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Angular-dependent torkance when magnetization rotating in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The k-resolved polarization-dependent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The atom-resolved (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a)-(c) denotes three atomic configurations, A, B, and C, with polarization-up, which are used for evaluating the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. (a)-(c) denotes three atomic configurations, A, B, and C, with polarization-down, which are used for evaluating the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Angular dependence of the torkance on the magnetization direction ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  2. [2]

    A. Fert, R. Ramesh, V. Garcia, F. Casanova, and M. Bibes, Electrical control of magnetism by electric field and current-induced torques, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015005 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Grollier, D

    J. Grollier, D. Querlioz, K. Y. Camsari, K. Everschor- Sitte, S. Fukami, and M. D. Stiles, Neuromorphic spin- tronics, Nat. Electron.3, 360 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Q. Shao, P. Li, L. Liu, H. Yang, S. Fukami, A. Razavi, H. Wu, K. Wang, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, M. D. Stiles, S. Emori, A. Hoffmann, J. ˚Akerman, K. Roy, J.-P. Wang, S.-H. Yang, K. Garello, and W. Zhang, Roadmap of spin–orbit torques, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics57, 1 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    I. M. Miron, K. Garello, G. Gaudin, P.-J. Zermatten, M. V. Costache, S. Auffret, S. Bandiera, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, and P. Gambardella, Perpendicular switch- ing of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection, Nature476, 189 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    L. Liu, O. J. Lee, T. J. Gudmundsen, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Current-induced switching of perpen- dicularly magnetized magnetic layers using spin torque from the spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 096602 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    Liu, C.-F

    L. Liu, C.-F. Pai, Y. Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque switching with the giant spin hall effect of tantalum, Science336, 555 (2012)

    2012

Show all 106 references
  1. [9]

    C. Song, R. Zhang, L. Liao, Y. Zhou, X. Zhou, R. Chen, Y. You, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Spin-orbit torques: Mate- rials, mechanisms, performances, and potential applica- tions, Progress in Materials Science118, 100761 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    D. Go, F. Freimuth, J.-P. Hanke, F. Xue, O. Gomonay, K.-J. Lee, S. Bl¨ ugel, P. M. Haney, H.-W. Lee, and Y. Mokrousov, Theory of current-induced angular mo- mentum transfer dynamics in spin-orbit coupled sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033401 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    S. D. Ganichev, E. Ivchenko, V. Bel’Kov, S. Tarasenko, M. Sollinger, D. Weiss, W. Wegscheider, and W. Prettl, Spin-galvanic effect, Nature417, 153 (2002)

    2002

  5. [13]

    Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital edelstein ef- fects, J

    A. Johansson, Theory of spin and orbital edelstein ef- fects, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter36, 423002 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    F. S. Guimar˜ aes, J. Bouaziz, M. dos Santos Dias, and S. Lounis, Spin-orbit torques and their associated effec- tive fields from gigahertz to terahertz, Commun. Phys. 3, 19 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    K. Ando, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, K. Sasage, J. Ieda, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Electric manipulation of spin relaxation using the spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 036601 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Filianina, J.-P

    M. Filianina, J.-P. Hanke, K. Lee, D.-S. Han, S. Jaiswal, A. Rajan, G. Jakob, Y. Mokrousov, and M. Kl¨ aui, Electric-field control of spin-orbit torques in perpen- dicularly magnetized W/CoFeB/MgO films, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 217701 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Chen, H.-I

    T.-Y. Chen, H.-I. Chan, W.-B. Liao, and C.-F. Pai, Current-induced spin-orbit torque and field-free switch- ing in Mo-based magnetic heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Appl.10, 044038 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Nguyen, D

    M.-H. Nguyen, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin torque study of the spin hall conductivity and spin dif- fusion length in platinum thin films with varying resis- tivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 126601 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    L. Zhu, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Enhancement of spin transparency by interfacial alloying, Phys. Rev. B99, 180404 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    Chiang, W

    W.-C. Chiang, W. P. Pratt, M. Herrold, and D. V. Baxter, Effect of sputtering pressure on the structure and current-perpendicular-to-the-plane magnetotrans- port of co/ag multilayered films, Phys. Rev. B58, 5602 (1998)

    1998

  13. [21]

    G. G. B. Flores and K. D. Belashchenko, Effect of inter- facial intermixing on spin-orbit torque in co/pt bilayers, Phys. Rev. B105, 054405 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Gupta, R

    K. Gupta, R. J. H. Wesselink, R. Liu, Z. Yuan, and P. J. Kelly, Disorder dependence of interface spin mem- ory loss, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 087702 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    W. Tang, H. Liu, Z. Li, A. Pan, and Y.-J. Zeng, Spin- orbit torque in van der waals-layered materials and het- erostructures, Advanced Science8, 2100847 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    Y. Deng, Y. Yu, Y. Song, J. Zhang, N. Z. Wang, Z. Sun, Y. Yi, Y. Z. Wu, S. Wu, J. Zhu,et al., Gate-tunable room-temperature ferromagnetism in two-dimensional Fe3GeTe2, Nature563, 94 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, D. R. Klein, D. MacNeill, E. Navarro-Moratalla, K. L. Seyler, N. Wilson, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, D. Xiao,et al., Electrical con- trol of 2d magnetism in bilayer CrI 3, Nat. Nanotech. 13, 544 (2018)

    2018

  18. [26]

    Zollner, M

    K. Zollner, M. Gmitra, and J. Fabian, Swapping ex- change and spin-orbit coupling in 2d van der waals het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 196402 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Gmitra and J

    M. Gmitra and J. Fabian, Proximity effects in bilayer graphene on monolayer WSe 2: Field-effect spin valley locking, spin-orbit valve, and spin transistor, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 146401 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Zollner and J

    K. Zollner and J. Fabian, Engineering proximity exchange by twisting: Reversal of ferromagnetic and emergence of antiferromagnetic dirac bands in Graphene/Cr2Ge2Te6, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 106401 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Naimer, P

    T. Naimer, P. E. Faria Junior, K. Zollner, and J. Fabian, Radial rashba spin-orbit fields in commensurate twisted transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers, Phys. Rev. B 113, 045417 (2026)

    2026

  22. [30]

    Zollner, S

    K. Zollner, S. a. M. Jo˜ ao, B. K. Nikoli´ c, and J. Fabian, Twist- and gate-tunable proximity spin-orbit coupling, spin relaxation anisotropy, and charge-to-spin con- version in heterostructures of graphene and transi- tion metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B108, 235166 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    H. Yang, B. Mart ´ ın-Garc ´ ıa, J. Kim´ ak, E. Schmoranze- rov´ a, E. Dolan, Z. Chi, M. Gobbi, P. Nˇ emec, L. E. 14 Hueso, and F. Casanova, Twist-angle-tunable spin tex- ture in WSe 2/graphene van der waals heterostructures, Nat. Mater.23, 1502 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Liang, P

    X. Liang, P. Lv, Y. Xiong, X. Chen, D. Fu, Y. Feng, X. Wang, X. Chen, G. Xu, E. Kan,et al., Moir´ e en- gineering of spin–orbit torque by twisted WS 2 homobi- layers, Adv. Mater.36, 2313059 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    W. Pan, S. Ji, and Z. Xu, Strain-induced intrinsic anti- ferromagnetic skyrmions in two-dimensional janus mag- nets, Phys. Rev. B110, 144408 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    J.-J. Xian, C. Wang, J.-H. Nie, R. Li, M. Han, J. Lin, W.-H. Zhang, Z.-Y. Liu, Z.-M. Zhang, M.-P. Miao,et al., Spin mapping of intralayer antiferromag- netism and field-induced spin reorientation in monolayer CrTe2, Nat. Commun.13, 257 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Huang, G

    S. Huang, G. Zhang, F. Fan, C. Song, F. Wang, Q. Xing, C. Wang, H. Wu, and H. Yan, Strain-tunable van der waals interactions in few-layer black phosphorus, Nat. Commun.10, 2447 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Z. Fei, B. Huang, P. Malinowski, W. Wang, T. Song, J. Sanchez, W. Yao, D. Xiao, X. Zhu, A. F. May,et al., Two-dimensional itinerant ferromagnetism in atomi- cally thin Fe3GeTe2, Nat. Mater.17, 778 (2018)

    2018

  29. [37]

    A. M. Ruiz, D. L. Esteras, D. L´ opez-Alcal´ a, and J. J. Baldov ´ ı, On the origin of the above-room- temperature magnetism in the 2d van der waals ferro- magnet Fe3GaTe2, Nano Lett.24, 7886 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    S. Wu, Z. He, M. Gu, L. Ren, J. Li, B. Deng, D. Wang, X. Guo, W. Li, M. Chen,et al., Robust ferromagnetism in wafer-scale Fe3GaTe2 above room-temperature, Nat. Commun.15, 10765 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    M. Wang, B. Lei, K. Zhu, Y. Deng, M. Tian, Z. Xiang, T. Wu, and X. Chen, Hard ferromagnetism in van der waals Fe3GaTe2 nanoflake down to monolayer, npj 2D Mater. Appl.8, 22 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. Lu, W. Liu, W. Niu, J. Sun, J. Cook, M. Vaninger, P. F. Miceli, D. J. Singh, S.-W. Lian,et al., Room-temperature intrinsic ferromagnetism in epitaxial CrTe2 ultrathin films, Nat. Commun.12, 2492 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    L. Meng, Z. Zhou, M. Xu, S. Yang, K. Si, L. Liu, X. Wang, H. Jiang, B. Li, P. Qin,et al., Anoma- lous thickness dependence of curie temperature in air- stable two-dimensional ferromagnetic 1T-CrTe 2 grown by chemical vapor deposition, Nat. Commun.12, 809 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    H. Wang, H. Wu, J. Zhang, Y. Liu, D. Chen, C. Pandey, J. Yin, D. Wei, N. Lei, S. Shi,et al., Room tem- perature energy-efficient spin-orbit torque switching in two-dimensional van der waals Fe 3GeTe2 induced by topological insulators, Nature communications14, 5173 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Guillet, R

    T. Guillet, R. Galceran, J. F. Sierra, F. J. Be- larre, B. Ballesteros, M. V. Costache, D. Dosen- ovic, H. Okuno, A. Marty, M. Jamet,et al., Spin–orbit torques and magnetization switching in (Bi,Sb) 2Te3/Fe3GeTe2 heterostructures grown by molecular beam epitaxy, Nano Lett.24, ...

    2024

  36. [44]

    Lohmann, D

    M. Lohmann, D. Wickramaratne, J. Moon, M. Noyan, H.-J. Chuang, B. T. Jonker, and C. H. Li, Highly effi- cient spin–orbit torque switching in bi2se3/fe3gete2 van der waals heterostructures, ACS Nano18, 680 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    Wang and H

    Y. Wang and H. Yang, Spin–orbit torques based on topological materials, Accounts of Materials Research 3, 1061 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    I.-H. Kao, R. Muzzio, H. Zhang, M. Zhu, J. Gobbo, S. Yuan, D. Weber, R. Rao, J. Li, J. H. Edgar, et al., Deterministic switching of a perpendicularly po- larized magnet using unconventional spin–orbit torques in WTe2, Nat. Mater.21, 1029 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    S. N. Kajale, T. Nguyen, N. T. Hung, M. Li, and D. Sarkar, Field-free deterministic switching of all–van der waals spin-orbit torque system above room temper- ature, Sci. Adv.10, eadk8669 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    MacNeill, G

    D. MacNeill, G. Stiehl, M. Guimaraes, R. Buhrman, J. Park, and D. Ralph, Control of spin–orbit torques through crystal symmetry in WTe 2/ferromagnet bilay- ers, Nat. Phys.13, 300 (2017)

    2017

  41. [49]

    F. Wang, G. Shi, K.-W. Kim, H.-J. Park, J. G. Jang, H. R. Tan, M. Lin, Y. Liu, T. Kim, D. Yang, et al., Field-free switching of perpendicular magneti- zation by two-dimensional PtTe 2/WTe2 van der waals heterostructures with high spin hall conductivity, Nat. Mater.23, 768 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Zhang, X

    Y. Zhang, X. Ren, R. Liu, Z. Chen, X. Wu, J. Pang, W. Wang, G. Lan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi,et al., Robust field-free switching using large unconventional spin-orbit torque in an all-van der waals heterostruc- ture, Adv. Mater.36, 2406464 (2024)

    2024

  43. [51]

    Pandey, B

    L. Pandey, B. Zhao, K. Tenzin, R. Ngaloy, V. Lam- parsk´ a, H. Bangar, A. Ali, M. Abdel-Hafiez, G. Zhang, H. Wu,et al., Tunable unconventional spin orbit torque magnetization dynamics in van der waals heterostruc- tures, Nat. Commun.16, 8722 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Xu, K. Jia, G. Lan, Z. Huang, B. He, C. He, Q. Shao, Y. Wang, M. Zhao,et al., Room tem- perature field-free switching of perpendicular magneti- zation through spin-orbit torque originating from low- symmetry type ii weyl semimetal, Sci. Adv.9, eadg9819 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Y. Liu, G. Shi, D. Kumar, T. Kim, S. Shi, D. Yang, J. Zhang, C. Zhang, F. Wang, S. Yang,et al., Field- free switching of perpendicular magnetization at room temperature using out-of-plane spins from TaIrTe4, Nat. Electron.6, 732 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    G. Shi, F. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Li, H. R. Tan, D. Yang, A. Soumyanarayanan, and H. Yang, Field-free manipu- lation of two-dimensional ferromagnet CrTe 2 by spin– orbit torques, Nano Lett.24, 7302 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    Voj´ acek, J

    L. Voj´ acek, J. Medina Due˜ nas, J. Li, F. Ibrahim, A. Manchon, S. Roche, M. Chshiev, and J. H. Garc ´ ıa, Field-free spin–orbit torque switching in janus chromium dichalcogenides, Nano Lett.24, 11889 (2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    Rassekh and M

    M. Rassekh and M. Gmitra, Proximity-induced spin- orbit torque in graphene on a trigonal CrSBr monolayer, Phys. Rev. B113, 035126 (2026)

    2026

  49. [57]

    Zollner, M

    K. Zollner, M. D. Petrovi´ c, K. Dolui, P. Plech´ aˇ c, B. K. Nikoli´ c, and J. Fabian, Scattering-induced and highly tunable by gate damping-like spin-orbit torque in graphene doubly proximitized by two-dimensional mag- net Cr2Ge2Te6 and monolayer WS2, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043057 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Dolui, M

    K. Dolui, M. D. Petrovi´ c, K. Zollner, P. Plech´ aˇ c, J. Fabian, and B. K. Nikoli´ c, Proximity spin–orbit torque on a two-dimensional magnet within van der waals heterostructure: Current-driven antiferromagnet- to-ferromagnet reversible nonequilibrium phase transi- tion in ...

    2020

  51. [59]

    F. Xue, M. D. Stiles, and P. M. Haney, Angular de- pendence of spin-orbit torque in monolayer Fe 3GeTe2, Phys. Rev. B108, 144422 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Mishra, F

    R. Mishra, F. Mahfouzi, D. Kumar, K. Cai, M. Chen, X. Qiu, N. Kioussis, and H. Yang, Electric-field control of spin accumulation direction for spin-orbit torques, Nat. Commun.10, 248 (2019)

    2019

  53. [61]

    K. Cai, M. Yang, H. Ju, S. Wang, Y. Ji, B. Li, K. W. Edmonds, Y. Sheng, B. Zhang, N. Zhang,et al., Electric field control of deterministic current-induced magneti- zation switching in a hybrid ferromagnetic/ferroelectric structure, Nat. Mater.16, 712 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    Kang, J.-G

    M.-G. Kang, J.-G. Choi, J. Jeong, J. Y. Park, H.-J. Park, T. Kim, T. Lee, K.-J. Kim, K.-W. Kim, J. H. Oh,et al., Electric-field control of field-free spin-orbit torque switching via laterally modulated rashba effect in Pt/Co/AlO𝑥 structures, Nat. Commun.12, 7111 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Zheng, S

    Z. Zheng, S. Shi, Z. Liu, Q. Zhang, N. A. Shahed, H. Ma- vani, G. Zhou, Q. Chen, C. Zhang, Z. Zhou, T. Zhao, R. Xiao, L. Jia, L. Liu, E. Y. Tsymbal, X. Xu, H. Tian, and J. Chen, Spin-orbit torque induced by switchable crystal inversion symmetry breaking, Adv. Mater.38, e73219 (2026)

    2026

  56. [64]

    S.-h. C. Baek, K.-W. Park, D.-S. Kil, Y. Jang, J. Park, K.-J. Lee, and B.-G. Park, Complementary logic opera- tion based on electric-field controlled spin–orbit torques, Nat. Electron.1, 398 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Grezes, A

    C. Grezes, A. Kandazoglou, M. Cosset-Cheneau, L. M. V. Arche, P. No¨ el, P. Sgarro, S. Auffret, K. Garello, M. Bibes, L. Vila,et al., Non-volatile electric control of spin-orbit torques in an oxide two-dimensional electron gas, Nat. Commun.14, 2590 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    H. Dery, P. Dalal, L. Cywi´ nski, and L. J. Sham, Spin- based logic in semiconductors for reconfigurable large- scale circuits, Nature447, 573 (2007)

    2007

  59. [67]

    Mukherjee, D

    S. Mukherjee, D. Dutta, A. Ghosh, and E. Koren, Graphene-In2Se3 van der waals heterojunction neuris- tor for optical in-memory bimodal operation, ACS nano 17, 22287 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    C. Gong, E. M. Kim, Y. Wang, G. Lee, and X. Zhang, Multiferroicity in atomic van der waals heterostructures, Nat. Commun.10, 2657 (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    Tang and L

    X. Tang and L. Kou, Two-dimensional ferroics and mul- tiferroics: platforms for new physics and applications, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 6634 (2019)

    2019

  62. [70]

    J. Li, Q. Wu, and H. Weng, Ferroelectric switching of quantum anomalous hall effects in MnBi 2Te4 films, npj Quantum Mater.10, 89 (2025)

    2025

  63. [71]

    X. Xu, T. Zhang, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Electric-field switching of the antiferromagnetic topo- logical state in a multiferroic heterobilayer, Phys. Rev. B106, 205307 (2022)

    2022

  64. [72]

    K. Dou, W. Du, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Two-dimensional magnetoelectric multiferroics in a MnSTe/in2se3 heterobilayer with ferroelectrically con- trollable skyrmions, Phys. Rev. B105, 205427 (2022)

    2022

  65. [73]

    W. Du, K. Dou, Z. He, Y. Dai, Z. Wang, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Ferroelectric switchable topological antifer- romagnetism, Nano Lett. (2026)

    2026

  66. [74]

    Q. Cui, Y. Zhu, J. Jiang, J. Liang, D. Yu, P. Cui, and H. Yang, Ferroelectrically controlled topological mag- netic phase in a janus-magnet-based multiferroic het- erostructure, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043011 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    Huang, D.-F

    K. Huang, D.-F. Shao, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Ferroelec- tric control of magnetic skyrmions in two-dimensional van der waals heterostructures, Nano Letters22, 3349 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Z.-q. Wang, F. Xue, L. Qiu, Z. Wang, R. Wu, and Y. Hou, Switching intrinsic magnetic skyrmions with controllable magnetic anisotropy in van der waals mul- tiferroic heterostructures, Nano Letters24, 4117 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    Y. Feng, X. Li, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Electri- cally switchable ferrovalleytricity in multiferroic heter- obilayers, Phys. Rev. B112, 094109 (2025)

    2025

  70. [78]

    C. Lei, X. Li, Y. Ma, and Z. Qian, Reversible nonvolatile control of anomalous valley hall effect in a multifer- roic van der waals heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B108, 155431 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    R. J. Sun, R. Liu, J. J. Lu, X. W. Zhao, G. C. Hu, X. B. Yuan, and J. F. Ren, Reversible switch- ing of anomalous valley hall effect in ferrovalley janus 1𝑡−CrO𝑥(𝑥=F,Cl,Br,I)and the multiferroic het- erostructure CrOX/In 2Se3, Phys. Rev. B105, 235416 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    J. Yang, K. Dou, Y. Dai, B. Huang, and Y. Ma, Electri- cally switchable topological magnetic phase transition in 2d multiferroics, Nano Lett.25, 12747 (2025)

    2025

  73. [81]

    F. Xue, Z. Wang, Y. Hou, L. Gu, and R. Wu, Control of magnetic properties of MnBi 2Te4 using a van der waals ferroelectric IIi2−Vi3 film and biaxial strain, Phys. Rev. B101, 184426 (2020)

    2020

  74. [82]

    B. Wang, Y. Bai, C. Wang, S. Liu, S. Yao, Y. Jia, and J. Cho, Ferroelectric control of magnetic anisotropy in multiferroic heterostructure EuSn2As2/In2Se3, Phys. Rev. B110, 094423 (2024)

    2024

  75. [83]

    Y. Su, X. Li, M. Zhu, J. Zhang, L. You, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Van der waals multiferroic tunnel junctions, Nano Lett.21, 175 (2020)

    2020

  76. [84]

    Z. Yan, Z. Li, Y. Han, Z. Qiao, and X. Xu, Giant tunneling magnetoresistance and electroresistance in 𝛼−In2Se3-based van der waals multiferroic tunnel junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B105, 075423 (2022)

    2022

  77. [85]

    L. Song, D. Chen, Y. Wang, C. Su, Y. Yang, and X. Zheng, Interlayer-enhanced magnetoresistance and electroresistance in VSe 2/Sc2CO2/NiClBr/VSe2 van der waals multiferroic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Appl.23, 054085 (2025)

    2025

  78. [86]

    Freimuth, S

    F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, and Y. Mokrousov, Spin-orbit torques in Co/Pt(111) and Mn/W(001) magnetic bilay- ers from first principles, Phys. Rev. B90, 174423 (2014)

    2014

  79. [87]

    G´ eranton, B

    G. G´ eranton, B. Zimmermann, N. H. Long, P. Mavropoulos, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, and Y. Mokrousov, Nonlocal fieldlike spin-orbit torques in rashba systems: Ab initio study of a Ag 2Bi-terminated Ag(111) film grown on a ferromagnetic Fe(110) substrate, Phys. Rev. B95, 134449 (2017)

    2017

  80. [88]

    G´ eranton, B

    G. G´ eranton, B. Zimmermann, N. H. Long, P. Mavropoulos, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, and Y. Mokrousov, Spin-orbit torques and spin accu- mulation in FePt/Pt and Co/Cu thin films from first principles: The role of impurities, Phys. Rev. B93, 224420 (2016)

    2016

  81. [89]

    Popoola, R

    A. Popoola, R. Kashikar, A. Azmy, I. Spanopoulos, H. Jafari, J. S lawi´ nska, S. Witanachchi, S. Lisenkov, and I. Ponomareva, Mechanically and electrically tunable rashba-edelstein effect in ferroelectric semiconductors, CsGe𝑋3 (𝑥=I,Br,Cl), Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 084412 16 (2025)

    2025

  82. [90]

    Tenzin, A

    K. Tenzin, A. Roy, H. Jafari, B. Banas, F. T. Cera- soli, M. Date, A. Jayaraj, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, and J. S lawi´ nska, Analogs of rashba-edelstein effect from density functional theory, Phys. Rev. B107, 165140 (2023)

    2023

  83. [91]

    Jafari, A

    H. Jafari, A. Roy, and J. S lawi´ nska, Ferroelectric control of charge-to-spin conversion in WTe2, Phys. Rev. Mater. 6, L091404 (2022)

    2022

  84. [92]

    Pan and J

    W. Pan and J. Fabian, Tunable edelstein effect in the in- trinsic two-dimensional ferroelectric metal PtBi2, Phys. Rev. B113, 165140 (2026)

    2026

  85. [93]

    Milivojevi´ c, J

    M. Milivojevi´ c, J. Mnich, P. Jureczko, M. Kurpas, and M. Gmitra, Ferroelectric switching control of spin cur- rent in graphene proximitized by In2Se3, Mater. Futures 5, 015201 (2026)

    2026

  86. [94]

    Z. Lin, C. Si, S. Duan, C. Wang, and W. Duan, Rashba splitting in bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides con- trolled by electronic ferroelectricity, Phys. Rev. B100, 155408 (2019)

    2019

  87. [95]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo,et al., Quantum espresso: a modular and open-source software project for quantum- simulations of materials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter21, 395502 (2009)

    2009

  88. [96]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  89. [98]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A con- sistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of den- sity functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu, J. Chem. Phys.132, 154104 (2010)

    2010

  90. [99]

    A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Van- derbilt, and N. Marzari, Wannier90: A tool for ob- taining maximally-localised wannier functions, Comput. Phys. Commun.178, 685 (2008)

    2008

  91. [100]

    Sakuma, Symmetry-adapted wannier functions in the maximal localization procedure, Phys

    R. Sakuma, Symmetry-adapted wannier functions in the maximal localization procedure, Phys. Rev. B87, 235109 (2013)

    2013

  92. [101]

    S. S. Tsirkin, High performance wannier interpolation of berry curvature and related quantities with wannier- berri code, npj Comput. Mater.7, 33 (2021)

    2021

  93. [102]

    G. M. S. Brizolla, S. S. Tsirkin, Y. Zhumagulov, and J. Fabian, Anatomy of spin–orbit torques in mono- layer Fe 3GeTe2 and Fe 3GaTe2: Insights from atom- istic and momentum-space decompositions, (2026), arXiv:2608.05788

    2026 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Xue and P

    F. Xue and P. M. Haney, Intrinsic staggered spin-orbit torque for the electrical control of antiferromagnets: Ap- plication to CrI 3, Phys. Rev. B104, 224414 (2021)

    2021

  95. [104]

    Zelezny, Wannier linear response, https://bitbucket.org/zeleznyj/wannier-linear- response/wiki/Home

    J. Zelezny, Wannier linear response, https://bitbucket.org/zeleznyj/wannier-linear- response/wiki/Home

  96. [105]

    C. Xu, X. Li, P. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Xiang, and L. Bellaiche, Assembling diverse skyrmionic phases in Fe3GeTe2 monolayers, Adv. Mater.34, 2107779 (2022)

    2022

  97. [106]

    W. Ding, J. Zhu, Z. Wang, Y. Gao, D. Xiao, Y. Gu, Z. Zhang, and W. Zhu, Prediction of intrinsic two- dimensional ferroelectrics in In 2Se3 and other III2-VI3 van der waals materials, Nat. Commun.8, 14956 (2017)

    2017

  98. [107]

    L. Bai, C. Ke, Z. Luo, T. Zhu, L. You, and S. Liu, Intrin- sic ferroelectric switching in two-dimensional𝛼-In 2Se3, ACS Nano18, 26103 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.