Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 77 references

Four-Fermion Condensates in Curved Spacetimes: A Functional Approach

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A vacuum Nambu–Jona-Lasinio condensate in curved spacetime generates a local one-loop energy-momentum tensor, and the paper derives its explicit FLRW form in Eqs. (5.14)–(5.15).

desk verdict A careful, self-consistent derivation of the local one-loop NJL energy-momentum tensor in curved spacetime; the central formulas are new and check out, with the domain of validity honestly scoped. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07907 v1 pith:XY7YX35E submitted 2026-08-08 hep-th gr-qc

Stephon Alexander , Heliudson Bernardo , Jiatong Yan This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords Nambu–Jona-Lasiniomodelcurvedspacetimeenergy-momentumtensorheatkernelclosed-time-pathfunctionalBCSpairingFLRWcosmology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper attempts to establish a local, one-loop formula for the energy-momentum tensor sourced by a scalar-channel Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) vacuum condensate on a curved spacetime, and to write it explicitly on a spatially flat FLRW background. The central result is Eqs. (5.14)–(5.15): the regulated energy density and pressure of a constant condensate, expressed through the effective fermion mass $m_{\rm eff}$, the auxiliary condensate field $\Theta$, and the Hubble rate $H$. If the derivation is correct, these expressions supply the quantum matter source that semiclassical Einstein equations would use in cosmological models where four-fermion interactions are integrated to a homogeneous NJL condensate. The paper also gives a functional separation of perturbative four-fermion scattering, vacuum NJL condensation, and finite-density BCS pairing, stressing that expectation values in cosmology require the in-in (closed-time-path) functional rather than the in-out functional. The calculation is a derivative (heat-kernel) expansion whose control condition is $|R|/m_{\rm eff}^2\ll 1$, and the paper itself observes that the formulas lose validity as $m_{\rm eff}\to 0$.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Hubbard–Stratonovich linearization of the four-fermion interaction: an auxiliary scalar $\Theta$ shifts the fermion mass to $m_{\rm eff}=m+\Theta$, so the interacting theory is replaced by a free Dirac determinant in a spacetime-dependent mass. The parity-even determinant is reduced with the Schrödinger–Lichnerowicz identity to the Laplace-type operator $K[M]=-\nabla^2_{\rm spin}+\frac{1}{4}R+M^2-\gamma^\mu\nabla_\mu M$, whose traced heat-kernel coefficients $b_0=4$, $b_1=-4M^2-R/3$, and $b_2=2M^4+\frac13 R M^2+2(\nabla M)^2-\frac23\square M^2+\cdots$ carry the local volume, Einstein–Hilbert, curvature-squared, and condensate-gradient operators. The covariant effective action is varied before imposing the FLRW ansatz, which is what yields both energy density and pressure.

What would settle it

Evaluate the one-loop fermionic energy-momentum tensor on a fixed spatially flat FLRW background without the derivative expansion—e.g. by a full adiabatic or mode-sum computation adapted to the same NJL saddle—at $H/m_{\rm eff}$ around unity. If the difference from Eqs. (5.14)–(5.15) does not vanish as $H^2/m_{\rm eff}^2\to 0$, or if the local formulas fail to reduce to $p=-\rho$ at $H=\dot H=0$, the central claim is disproved.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the parity-even one-loop determinant of a Dirac fermion with an NJL mass shift $M(x)=m+\Theta(x)$ produces a covariant local effective action whose metric variation yields a closed-form energy-momentum tensor. For a constant saddle on a spatially flat FLRW background, the regulated energy density and pressure are $$\$rho^{{\rm reg}}$_{\rm MF}=2P_d m_{\rm eff}^4\Gamma(-d/2)+\frac{\$Theta^{2}$}{4\$\lambda$}-P_d m_{\rm eff}^2\Gamma(1-d/2)$H^{2}$,$$ $$$p^{{\rm reg}}$_{\rm MF}=-2P_d m_{\rm eff}^4\Gamma(-d/2)-\frac{\$Theta^{2}$}{4\$\lambda$}+\frac{P_d m_{\rm eff}^2}{3}\Gamma(1-d/2)(2\dot H+$3H^{2}$),$$ with $P_d$ the dimensionally continued prefactor of Eq. (4.20). The paper states that the $H=0$ limit reproduces the direct flat-space mean-field calculation, and that a globally constant condensate automatically satisfies the local conservation law when the condensate equation is imposed. The same formalism exhibits the local volume, Einstein–Hilbert, and curvature-squared operators generated by the fermion loop, and explains why BCS pairing requires a different saddle, state data, and Nambu–Gorkov kernel.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the local heat-kernel/derivative expansion being controlled, i.e. $|R|/m_{\rm eff}^2\ll 1$ and $|\nabla R|/m_{\rm eff}^3\ll 1$; the paper itself notes that the formulas become uncontrolled as $m_{\rm eff}\to 0$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In flat spacetime with a constant condensate, Eqs. (5.14)–(5.15) reduce to $p=-\rho$, the vacuum equation of state of a homogeneous NJL mean field.
  • On FLRW the one-loop fermion determinant renormalizes the cosmological constant, Einstein–Hilbert, and curvature-squared gravitational couplings; an independent finite $R^2$ coupling contributes nonzero $\rho_{R^2}$ and $p_{R^2}$ even though the Weyl-squared term drops out in spatially flat FLRW.
  • A time-dependent condensate is only consistent with local energy-momentum conservation if it satisfies the condensate equation (5.10); prescribing $\Theta(t)$ by hand generically violates $\dot\rho+3H(\rho+p)=0$.
  • Finite-density BCS pairing cannot be treated as a vacuum NJL condensate: it needs an attractive projected Cooper channel, occupied mode data, and a Nambu–Gorkov kernel, and in curved spacetime its energy-momentum tensor will depend on the initial density matrix.
  • A globally constant $\Theta$ solves the dynamical condensate equation only when $U' - F' R=0$ is compatible with the background, so constant-saddle results are valid on restricted geometries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same derivative expansion can be adapted to a slowly rolling condensate, giving a two-field system $(H(t),\Theta(t))$ whose equations are (5.8)–(5.10); solving them self-consistently would test whether NJL condensates can support nonsingular or dark-energy cosmologies.
  • Editorial extension: near the chiral limit $m_{\rm eff}\to 0$ the local formulas break down, so quantitative cosmological predictions in that regime would require a nonlocal or resummed computation, not just analytic continuation.
  • Editorial extension: the BCS appendix suggests that a curved-spacetime BCS energy-momentum tensor will require solving for the pairing field $\Delta(t)$ on the closed time path with a specified initial state, which is a substantial but well-posed extension.
  • Editorial extension: the finite renormalized coefficient $Z(\Theta)$ requires a two-point matching; until that is fixed, predictions that depend on the condensate kinetic term are not fully determined by the one-loop local action.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a functional description of four-fermion interactions in curved spacetime and computes the one-loop local energy-momentum tensor sourced by a scalar-channel NJL condensate. It distinguishes in-out transition amplitudes from in-in expectation values, reviews the role of state data, and contrasts perturbative, NJL, and BCS regimes. The central calculation linearizes the four-fermion interaction with a Hubbard-Stratonovich field, reduces the parity-even Dirac determinant to Laplace-type form, and uses heat-kernel coefficients through fourth adiabatic order to obtain a local effective action. Specializing to spatially flat FLRW spacetime yields the energy density and pressure in Eqs. (5.14) and (5.15). The flat-space limit reproduces the direct mode-sum mean-field calculation, and the conservation identity (5.11) is verified. The paper is explicit that the result is a local massive-saddle expression, with nonlocal, state-dependent, and small-mass contributions outside the stated regime.

Significance. If the central result holds, it supplies a useful covariant baseline for semiclassical-gravity applications of NJL condensation: a one-loop local source with explicit curvature-dependent terms that is internally cross-checked against flat-space mode sums and the scalar heat-kernel benchmark. The paper's strengths include the self-consistent derivation of the gap equation from the same action, the verified conservation relation between the condensate equation and the energy-momentum tensor, the explicit treatment of renormalization structure in curved spacetime, and the pedagogical separation of in-out versus in-in functionals and of NJL versus BCS condensation. No parameters are fitted to the final FLRW formulas. The main limitation is domain of validity: the local derivative expansion requires |R|/m_eff^2 << 1 and |nabla R|/m_eff^3 << 1, so the explicit formulas in Eqs. (5.14)-(5.15) are not controlled in the small-mass or massless regime; the paper itself acknowledges this in Sec. IVC.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. VI] The abstract presents Eqs. (5.14)-(5.15) without the derivative-expansion control condition stated near Eq. (3.11). Because the formulas have a singular m_eff -> 0 limit and the paper itself notes in Sec. IVC that the local massive expansion is uncontrolled there, I recommend adding an explicit domain-of-validity sentence to the abstract, such as 'valid for |R|/m_eff^2 << 1 and |nabla R|/m_eff^3 << 1'.
  2. [Sec. V.C] The statement that the f_2 sector has no four-dimensional spatially flat FLRW bulk variation should be read as applying to the subtracted, exactly four-dimensional local action with constant coefficient; before subtraction, the pole term Gamma(2-d/2) times the S_psi integral does contribute on FLRW. The surrounding text and footnote are correct, but Eqs. (5.14)-(5.15) could be misread as the complete dimensionally regulated one-loop source, so a short clarifying sentence would help.
  3. [Sec. V.D] The paper correctly says that renormalization and matching conditions are needed before the coefficients become physical, but this point could be stated more prominently. Equations (5.14)-(5.15) are regulated local coefficients, not scheme-independent expectation values; their quantitative use requires the counterterm basis in Eqs. (5.17) and (5.20) and the matching conditions described in Sec. V.D.
  4. [Footnote 1] The gamma-matrix convention footnote is very compressed and may confuse readers; a few explicit lines translating the kinetic operator and spin sums between the two signatures would improve accessibility.
  5. [Eq. (5.16) vicinity] There is a typo around Eq. (5.16): 'aswhichshouldbedueto' should be split into 'as which should be due to' or rewritten as a normal sentence.
  6. [Sec. II.F and Appendix E] The BCS grand-potential material is thorough but lengthy relative to the central NJL result. Since the main text already gives the physical BCS/NJL distinction and Appendix E contains the detailed derivation, condensing the main-text BCS discussion would help the paper's focus.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the curved-space NJL energy-momentum tensor follows from externally sourced heat-kernel coefficients and covariant metric variation; the flat-space limit is a consistency check, not an input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs. The Hubbard–Stratonovich transformation rewrites the four-fermion interaction as a quadratic fermion action with an auxiliary field, and the gap equation is a stationary condition of the resulting effective action rather than an externally imposed fit. The local one-loop effective action in Eq. (4.34) uses spinor heat-kernel coefficients f_ψ^0, f_ψ^1, and f_ψ^2 quoted from standard external sources (Parker–Toms, Vassilevich) and rederived in Appendix B using the Schrödinger–Lichnerowicz identity; these are not taken from the authors' prior work. The FLRW energy density and pressure, Eqs. (5.14)–(5.15), are obtained by varying the covariant action before specializing to FLRW, with Θ held fixed, so the H^2 and (2Hdot+3H^2) terms arise from the metric variation of F_reg R, not from a fit. The flat-space limit H = Hdot = 0 reproduces Eq. (4.25), which was derived independently from mode sums, so this is a check rather than a constraint that defines the curved-space answer. The conservation identity (5.16) follows from the Bianchi identity and the condensate equation, not from an imposed fit. No parameter is fitted to the target result, and no self-citation is load-bearing: the authors' own papers appear only as contextual applications in the introduction and discussion. The paper explicitly scopes its validity to the local massive heat-kernel regime, |R|/m_eff^2 << 1 and |nabla R|/m_eff^3 << 1 (around Eq. (3.11)), and flags the m_eff = 0 singular behavior in Sec. IVC as indicating that the expansion is no longer controlled; that is a domain-of-validity limitation, not a circular reduction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central NJL calculation uses standard heat-kernel technology and an auxiliary Hubbard-Stratonovich field; it introduces no new particles or forces. The free parameters are EFT inputs and renormalization-scheme choices, none fitted to the target energy-momentum tensor. The mean-field and local-expansion axioms are the main load-bearing assumptions and are flagged by the authors in Sec. VI.

free parameters (4)
  • m (bare fermion mass) = input
    Defines the matter sector in Eq. (2.18); not fitted to the output.
  • M_4F (four-fermion scale, lambda = 1/M_4F^2) = input
    The EFT suppression scale in Eq. (2.17); must be matched by a physical UV prescription.
  • mu_DR (dimensional regularization scale) = scheme choice
    Introduced in Eq. (3.5) to define the regulated integrals; physical results are renormalization-group invariant only after matching.
  • mu_0 (BCS matching scale) = scheme choice
    Used in Appendix E to fix G_C, Z_Delta, lambda_Delta; affects the BCS potential but not the NJL central claim.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Heat-kernel asymptotic expansion for Laplace-type operators
    Used in Sec. III and IV to obtain local coefficients (3.12), (3.28), (4.30), cited to Birrell-Davies, Parker-Toms, Vassilevich.
  • standard math Schrodinger-Lichnerowicz identity (gamma^mu nabla_mu)^2 = nabla^2_spin - R/4
    Used in Sec. IIIB to reduce the Dirac determinant to a Laplace-type operator; cited to [2,59,65].
  • standard math Dimensional regularization with fixed spinor dimension
    Used throughout to regulate mode sums and determinants; choice stated in Sec. IIIB.
  • domain assumption Mean-field / saddle-point truncation for the auxiliary field Theta
    Defined in Sec. IVA via Eq. (4.2) neglecting (delta O)^2; reliability depends on omitted collective fluctuations.
  • domain assumption Scalar-channel projection and parity-even vacuum state
    The pseudoscalar auxiliary field is set to zero; state has vanishing density and currents, Sec. IVA and Sec. VI.
  • domain assumption Local derivative expansion controlled: |R|/m_eff^2 << 1, |nabla R|/m_eff^3 << 1
    Required for truncation of the heat-kernel series, stated in Eq. (3.11); breaks down at m_eff -> 0.
  • domain assumption Vacuum (zero-density) state for the NJL computation
    The central claim concerns the vacuum particle-antiparticle saddle; finite-density BCS is discussed separately.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Four-Fermion Condensates in Curved Spacetimes: A Functional Approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XY7YX35E

@misc{pith2026260807907,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Four-Fermion Condensates in Curved Spacetimes: A Functional Approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XY7YX35E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07907}
}
read the original abstract

Four-fermion interactions appear in effective descriptions of particle physics, many-body systems, and gravitational theories with fermions. Although the same local operator may enter perturbative scattering, a vacuum Nambu-Jona-Lasinio (NJL) instability, or finite-density Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) pairing, these regimes are distinguished by their interaction channels, quadratic kernels, and quantum states. We give a pedagogical functional account of these distinctions and compute the local one-loop contribution of a scalar-channel NJL mean field to the energy-momentum tensor in curved spacetime. We first display the state data in the in-out functional and construct the closed-time-path functional required for an in-in expectation value. For the NJL saddle, a Hubbard-Stratonovich field shifts the fermion mass, and the parity-even Dirac determinant generates local volume, curvature, and curvature-squared operators. We find the covariant quantum effective action before specializing to a spatially flat FLRW background and derive the corresponding energy density and pressure. The constant-condensate limit agrees with the direct flat-space mean-field calculation. We also explain which additional state and channel data are required for finite-density BCS pairing and comment on renormalization conditions in curved spacetimes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.07907 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Scalar RPA series. Each black point is the reduced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Birrell and P

    N. Birrell and P. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press, 1982,doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511622632

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Parker and D

    L. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Fields and Grav- ity, Cambridge University Press, 2009,doi:10.1017/ CBO9780511813924

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    I. L. Buchbinder and I. Shapiro,Introduction to Quan- tum Field Theory with Applications to Quantum Grav- ity, Oxford University Press, 2021,doi:10.1093/oso/ 9780198838319.001.0001

    doi:10.1093/oso/ 2021

  4. [4]

    The cosmological constant problem,

    S. Weinberg, “The cosmological constant problem,” Rev. Mod. Phys.61(1989) 1–23,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 61.1

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys 1989

  5. [5]

    Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask),

    J. Martin, “Everything you always wanted to know about the cosmological constant problem (but were afraid to ask),” Comptes Rendus Physique13(2012) 566–665, arXiv:1205.3365[astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    LecturesontheCosmologicalConstantProb- lem,

    A.Padilla, “LecturesontheCosmologicalConstantProb- lem,”arXiv:1502.05296[hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [7]

    Modified Gravity Approaches to the Cosmo- logical Constant Problem,

    H. Bernardoet al.[Foundational Aspects of Dark Energy (FADE)], “Modified Gravity Approaches to the Cosmo- logical Constant Problem,” Universe9, no.2, 63 (2023) doi:10.3390/universe9020063 arXiv:2210.06810[gr- qc]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with super- conductivity. I,

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, “Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with super- conductivity. I,” Phys. Rev.122(1961) 345–358,doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.122.345

    doi:10.1103/physrev.122.345 1961

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with super- conductivity. II,

    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, “Dynamical model of elementary particles based on an analogy with super- conductivity. II,” Phys. Rev.124(1961) 246–254,doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.124.246

    1961 doi

  2. [10]

    The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,

    S. P. Klevansky, “The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.64(1992) 649–708,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.64.649

    1992 doi

  3. [11]

    Dynami- cal symmetry breaking in curved spacetime: Review,

    T. Inagaki, T. Muta and S. D. Odintsov, “Dynami- cal symmetry breaking in curved spacetime: Review,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.127(1997) 93,arXiv:hep-th/ 9711084[hep-th]

    1997

  4. [12]

    NJL-model analysis of dense quark mat- ter,

    M. Buballa, “NJL-model analysis of dense quark mat- ter,” Phys. Rept.407(2005) 205–376,doi:10.1016/j. physrep.2004.11.004,arXiv:hep-ph/0402234[hep-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Theory of superconductivity,

    J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper and J. R. Schrieffer, “Theory of superconductivity,” Phys. Rev.108(1957) 1175–1204, doi:10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175

    1957 doi

  6. [14]

    On the energy spectrum of superconduc- tors,

    L. P. Gor’kov, “On the energy spectrum of superconduc- tors,” Sov. Phys. JETP7(1958) 505–508, JETP archive

    1958

  7. [15]

    Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity,

    Y. Nambu, “Quasi-particles and gauge invariance in the theory of superconductivity,” Phys. Rev.117(1960) 648– 663,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.117.648

    1960 doi

  8. [16]

    Effective field theory and the Fermi sur- face,

    J. Polchinski, “Effective field theory and the Fermi sur- face,”arXiv:hep-th/9210046[hep-th]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    Renormalization group approach to interacting fermions,

    R. Shankar, “Renormalization group approach to interacting fermions,” Rev. Mod. Phys.66 (1994) 129–192,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.66.129, arXiv:cond-mat/9307009[cond-mat]

    1994 arXiv

  10. [18]

    The condensed mat- ter physics of QCD,

    K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, “The condensed mat- ter physics of QCD,” inAt the Frontier of Particle Physics / Handbook of QCD, edited by M. Shifman, World Scientific, 2001, pp. 2061–2151,doi:10.1142/ 9789812810458_0043,arXiv:hep-ph/0011333[hep-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,

    M. G. Alford, A. Schmitt, K. Rajagopal and T. Schäfer, “Color superconductivity in dense quark matter,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1455-1515 (2008)doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.80.1455 arXiv:0709.4635[hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  12. [20]

    General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects,

    F. W. Hehl, P. von der Heyde, G. D. Kerlick and J. M. Nester, “General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospects,” Rev. Mod. Phys.48(1976) 393–416,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.48.393

    1976 doi

  13. [21]

    Quantum grav- ity, torsion, parity violation and all that,

    L. Freidel, D. Minic and T. Takeuchi, “Quantum grav- ity, torsion, parity violation and all that,” Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 104002,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.104002, arXiv:hep-th/0507253[hep-th]

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gravity induced chi- ral condensate formation and the cosmological constant,

    S. H. S. Alexander and D. Vaid, “Gravity induced chi- ral condensate formation and the cosmological constant,” arXiv:hep-th/0609066[hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Cosmological constant from quarks and torsion,

    N. J. Poplawski, “Cosmological constant from quarks and torsion,” Annalen Phys.523(2011) 291,arXiv:1005. 0893[gr-qc]

    2011

  16. [24]

    Four-fermion interaction from torsion as dark energy,

    N. J. Poplawski, “Four-fermion interaction from torsion as dark energy,” Gen. Relativ. Gravit.44(2012) 491– 499,doi:10.1007/s10714-011-1288-1,arXiv:1102. 5667[gr-qc]

    2012 doi

  17. [25]

    Cos- mology with a spin,

    J. Magueijo, T. G. Zlosnik and T. W. B. Kibble, “Cos- mology with a spin,” Phys. Rev. D87, no.6, 063504 (2013)doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.063504 arXiv:1212. 0585[astro-ph.CO]

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    Fermion condensate from torsion in the reheating era after inflation,

    J. M. Weller, “Fermion condensate from torsion in the reheating era after inflation,” Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 083511,arXiv:1307.2423[gr-qc]. 22

    2013 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Cosmology and quantum field theory: A study of the Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model,

    L. Quintanar G. and A. de la Macorra, “Cosmology and quantum field theory: A study of the Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model,”arXiv:1511.06210[gr-qc]

    arXiv

  20. [28]

    Cosmology and quantum field theory II: Study of an extended Nambu- Jona-Lasinio model with a dynamical coupling,

    L. Quintanar G. and A. de la Macorra, “Cosmology and quantum field theory II: Study of an extended Nambu- Jona-Lasinio model with a dynamical coupling,”arXiv: 1511.07368[gr-qc]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Cosmological singulari- ties and bounce in Cartan–Einstein theory,

    S. Lucat and T. Prokopec, “Cosmological singulari- ties and bounce in Cartan–Einstein theory,” JCAP 10(2017) 047,doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/047, arXiv:1512.06074[gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Torsion, gravity induced chiral symme- try breaking, and cosmological bounce,

    G. Tukhashvili, “Torsion, gravity induced chiral symme- try breaking, and cosmological bounce,” Phys. Rev. D 109(2024)043536,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.043536, arXiv:2309.08654[gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Hybrid inflation from fermion condensa- tion,

    S. Alexander, P. Chen, J. Liu, A. Marciano, M. Sasaki and X. L. Su, “Hybrid inflation from fermion condensa- tion,” Phys. Lett. B873, 140193 (2026)doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2026.140193 arXiv:2509.25290[gr-qc]

    2026

  24. [32]

    Fermion Condensate Inflation, Dynami- cal Waterfall Mechanism and Primordial Black Holes,

    S. Alexander, P. Chen, J. Liu, A. Marciano, M. Sasaki and X. L. Su, “Fermion Condensate Inflation, Dynami- cal Waterfall Mechanism and Primordial Black Holes,” arXiv:2604.21535[hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Superconducting loop quantum gravity and the cosmological constant,

    S. H. Alexander and G. Calcagni, “Superconducting loop quantum gravity and the cosmological constant,” Phys. Lett. B672(2009) 386–389,arXiv:0806.4382[hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  26. [34]

    The cosmological BCS mechanism and the big bang singularity,

    S. Alexander and T. Biswas, “The cosmological BCS mechanism and the big bang singularity,” Phys. Rev. D 80(2009) 023501,arXiv:0807.4468[hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gravitationally bound BCS state as dark matter,

    S. Alexander and S. Cormack, “Gravitationally bound BCS state as dark matter,” JCAP04(2017) 005,arXiv: 1607.08621[astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Strongly-interacting ultralight millicharged par- ticles,

    S. Alexander, E. McDonough and D. N. Spergel, “Strongly-interacting ultralight millicharged par- ticles,” Phys. Lett. B822, 136653 (2021)doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136653 arXiv:2011.06589 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  29. [37]

    BCS in the sky: signatures of inflationary fermion condensation,

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, C. Zhang and Y. Zhu, “BCS in the sky: signatures of inflationary fermion condensation,” JCAP04(2024) 022,arXiv:2304.09428[hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    A Dark Mat- ter Fermionic Quantum Fluid from Standard Model Dy- namics,

    S. Alexander, H. Bernardo and H. Gilmer, “A Dark Mat- ter Fermionic Quantum Fluid from Standard Model Dy- namics,”arXiv:2405.08874[hep-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cold Dark Matter Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity,

    G. Liang and R. R. Caldwell, “Cold Dark Matter Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, no.19, 191004 (2025)doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 134.191004 arXiv:2408.08356[hep-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Brownian motion of a quantum oscilla- tor,

    J. Schwinger, “Brownian motion of a quantum oscilla- tor,” J. Math. Phys.2(1961) 407–432,doi:10.1063/1. 1703727

    1961 doi

  33. [41]

    Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,

    L. V. Keldysh, “Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes,” Sov. Phys. JETP20(1965) 1018–1026, JETP archive

    1965

  34. [42]

    Effective field equations for expectation values,

    R. D. Jordan, “Effective field equations for expectation values,” Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 444–454,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.33.444

    1986

  35. [43]

    Closed-time-path functional formalism in curved spacetime,

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, “Closed-time-path functional formalism in curved spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 495–509,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.35.495

    1987 doi

  36. [44]

    Schrödinger representation and Casimir effect in renormalizable quantum field theory,

    K. Symanzik, “Schrödinger representation and Casimir effect in renormalizable quantum field theory,” Nucl. Phys. B190(1981) 1–44,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81) 90482-X

    1981 doi

  37. [45]

    The Schrödinger wave functional and vacuum states in curved spacetime,

    D. V. Long and G. M. Shore, “The Schrödinger wave functional and vacuum states in curved spacetime,” Nucl. Phys. B530(1998) 247–278,doi:10.1016/ S0550-3213(98)00408-8,arXiv:hep-th/9605004[hep- th]

    1998 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Stochastic gravity: Theory and applications,

    B. L. Hu and E. Verdaguer, “Stochastic gravity: Theory and applications,” Living Rev. Relativ.11(2008) 3,doi: 10.12942/lrr-2008-3,arXiv:0802.0658[gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  39. [47]

    F. A. Berezin,The Method of Second Quantization, Aca- demic Press, New York, 1966, Open Library record

    1966

  40. [48]

    A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics,

    T. Matsubara, “A new approach to quantum-statistical mechanics,” Prog. Theor. Phys.14(1955) 351–378,doi: 10.1143/PTP.14.351

    1955 doi

  41. [49]

    Real- and imaginary-time field theory at finite temperature and density,

    N. P. Landsman and Ch. G. van Weert, “Real- and imaginary-time field theory at finite temperature and density,” Phys. Rep.145(1987) 141–249,doi:10.1016/ 0370-1573(87)90121-9

    1987

  42. [50]

    Functional integrals for QCD at nonzero chemical potential and zero density,

    T. D. Cohen, “Functional integrals for QCD at nonzero chemical potential and zero density,” Phys. Rev. Lett.91 (2003) 222001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.222001, arXiv:hep-ph/0307089[hep-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  43. [51]

    QCD functional integrals for systems with nonzero chemical potential,

    T. D. Cohen, “QCD functional integrals for systems with nonzero chemical potential,” inFrom Fields to Strings: Circumnavigating Theoretical Physics, Vol. 1, edited by M. Shifman, A. Vainshtein and J. Wheater (World Sci- entific, Singapore, 2005), pp. 101–120,doi:10.1142/ 97898...

    2005 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Phase diagram of helically imbalanced QCD matter,

    M. N. Chernodub and V. E. Ambrus, “Phase diagram of helically imbalanced QCD matter,” Phys. Rev. D 103, no.9, 094015 (2021),doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103. 094015,arXiv:2005.03575[hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A method for the computation of quantum distribution functions,

    R. L. Stratonovich, “A method for the computation of quantum distribution functions,” Sov. Phys. Dokl.2 (1958) 416–419, Math-Net.Ru record

    1958

  46. [54]

    Calculation of partition functions,

    J. Hubbard, “Calculation of partition functions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.3(1959) 77–78,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 3.77

    1959 doi

  47. [55]

    Superfluidity in a model of massless fermions coupled to scalar bosons,

    R. D. Pisarski and D. H. Rischke, “Superfluidity in a model of massless fermions coupled to scalar bosons,” Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 094013,arXiv:nucl-th/9903023 [nucl-th]

    1999 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Regularization and renor- malization of gauge fields,

    G. ’t Hooft and M. Veltman, “Regularization and renor- malization of gauge fields,” Nucl. Phys. B44(1972) 189– 213,doi:10.1016/0550-3213(72)90279-9

    1972 doi

  49. [57]

    On gauge invariance and vacuum polar- ization,

    J. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum polar- ization,” Phys. Rev.82(1951) 664–679,doi:10.1103/ PhysRev.82.664

    1951

  50. [58]

    B. S. DeWitt,Dynamical Theory of Groups and Fields, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965, Open Library record

    1965

  51. [59]

    Heat kernel expansion: User’s man- ual,

    D. V. Vassilevich, “Heat kernel expansion: User’s man- ual,” Phys. Rep.388(2003) 279–360,doi:10.1016/j. physrep.2003.09.002,arXiv:hep-th/0306138[hep-th]

    2003 arXiv

  52. [60]

    On the spin angular momentum of mesons,

    F. J. Belinfante, “On the spin angular momentum of mesons,” Physica6(1939) 887–898,doi:10.1016/ S0031-8914(39)90090-X

    1939

  53. [61]

    On the current and the density of the electric charge, the energy, the linear momentum and the angular momentum of arbitrary fields,

    F. J. Belinfante, “On the current and the density of the electric charge, the energy, the linear momentum and the angular momentum of arbitrary fields,” Physica7(1940) 449–474,doi:10.1016/S0031-8914(40)90091-X

    1940 doi

  54. [62]

    Sur le tenseur d’impulsion-énergie,

    L. Rosenfeld, “Sur le tenseur d’impulsion-énergie,” Mém. Acad. R. Belg. Cl. Sci.18, no. 6 (1940) 1–30, Persée archive. 23

    1940

  55. [63]

    Zeta function regularization of path in- tegrals in curved spacetime,

    S. W. Hawking, “Zeta function regularization of path in- tegrals in curved spacetime,” Commun. Math. Phys.55 (1977) 133–148,doi:10.1007/BF01626516

    1977 doi

  56. [64]

    Applications in physics of the multiplicative anomaly formula,

    E. Elizalde, L. Vanzo and S. Zerbini, “Applications in physics of the multiplicative anomaly formula,” Nucl. Phys. B532(1998) 407–428,doi:10.1016/ S0550-3213(98)00442-8,arXiv:hep-th/9804118[hep- th]

    1998 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Spineurs harmoniques,

    A. Lichnerowicz, “Spineurs harmoniques,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris257(1963) 7–9, Gallica scan

    1963

  58. [66]

    D. Z. Freedman and A. Van Proeyen,Supergrav- ity, Cambridge University Press, 2012,doi:10.1017/ CBO9781139026833

    2012

  59. [67]

    Topo- logical susceptibility, divergent chiral density and phase diagram of chirally imbalanced QCD medium at fi- nite temperature,

    M. Ruggieri, M. N. Chernodub and Z.-Y. Lu, “Topo- logical susceptibility, divergent chiral density and phase diagram of chirally imbalanced QCD medium at fi- nite temperature,” Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 014031, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.014031,arXiv:2004.09393 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [68]

    L’hypothèse du champ moléculaire et la pro- priété ferromagnétique,

    P. Weiss, “L’hypothèse du champ moléculaire et la pro- priété ferromagnétique,” J. Phys. Theor. Appl.6(1907) 661–690,doi:10.1051/jphystap:019070060066100

    1907 doi

  61. [69]

    The effect of thermal agitation on atomic arrangement in alloys,

    W. L. Bragg and E. J. Williams, “The effect of thermal agitation on atomic arrangement in alloys,” Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A145(1934) 699–730,doi:10.1098/rspa.1934. 0132

    1934 doi

  62. [70]

    The wave mechanics of an atom with a non-Coulomb central field. Part I. Theory and methods,

    D. R. Hartree, “The wave mechanics of an atom with a non-Coulomb central field. Part I. Theory and methods,” Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc.24(1928) 89–110,doi: 10.1017/S0305004100011919

    1928 doi

  63. [71]

    TheSmatrixinquantumelectrodynamics,

    F.J.Dyson, “TheSmatrixinquantumelectrodynamics,” Phys. Rev.75(1949) 1736–1755,doi:10.1103/PhysRev. 75.1736

    1949 doi

  64. [72]

    Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly,

    M. J. Duff, “Twenty years of the Weyl anomaly,” Class. Quant. Grav.11(1994) 1387–1404,doi:10.1088/ 0264-9381/11/6/004,arXiv:hep-th/9308075[hep-th]

    1994 arXiv

  65. [73]

    The back reaction effect in particle creation in curved space-time,

    R. M. Wald, “The back reaction effect in particle creation in curved space-time,” Commun. Math. Phys.54(1977) 1–19,doi:10.1007/BF01609833

    1977 doi

  66. [74]

    Renormalization of higher-derivative quan- tum gravity,

    K. S. Stelle, “Renormalization of higher-derivative quan- tum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D16(1977) 953–969,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.16.953

    1977 doi

  67. [75]

    Nambu- Jona-Lasinio model in curved spacetime with magnetic field,

    B. Geyer, L. N. Granda and S. D. Odintsov, “Nambu- Jona-Lasinio model in curved spacetime with magnetic field,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A11(1996) 2053–2063,doi:10. 1142/S0217732396002046,arXiv:hep-th/9605195[hep- th]

    1996 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Regularization, renormalization, and covariant geodesic point separation,

    S. M. Christensen, “Regularization, renormalization, and covariant geodesic point separation,” Phys. Rev. D17 (1978) 946–963,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.17.946

    1978 doi

  69. [77]

    Feynman propagator in curved space-time: A momentum-space representa- tion,

    T. S. Bunch and L. Parker, “Feynman propagator in curved space-time: A momentum-space representa- tion,” Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 2499–2510,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.20.2499. Appendix A: Scalar Green Function, Local Momentum Expansion, and Heat Kernel In this appendix we review the de...

    1979

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.