Ground-Truth Neighborhood Regularization for Reinforcement Learning Post-Training of Time Series Foundation Models

Changwen Zheng; Fanjiang Xu; JianQi Zhang; Wenwen Qiang; Xingyu Zhang; Zeen Song

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 294 references

Ground-Truth Neighborhood Regularization for Reinforcement Learning Post-Training of Time Series Foundation Models

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read RL post-training of time series foundation models can collapse toward wrong forecasts; this paper adds a ground-truth neighborhood regularizer that prevents it.

desk verdict A plausible and broadly tested regularizer for RL post-training of TSFMs; the theory is a conjecture dressed as a theorem, but the empirical claim holds up. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08010 v1 pith:TSWMO2KN submitted 2026-08-08 cs.LG cs.AI

Jianqi Zhang , Xingyu Zhang , Zeen Song , Changwen Zheng , Fanjiang Xu , Wenwen Qiang This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.LGcs.AI

keywords timeseriesforecastingfoundationmodelsreinforcementlearningpost-trainingsuboptimalcollapseground-truthneighborhoodregularizationprobabilisticprobabilitymasswithin-neighborhooduniformity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper identifies a failure mode in reinforcement-learning (RL) post-training of probabilistic time series foundation models: in some forecast regions, the model's predictive distribution gradually shifts away from the ground truth even as overall error decreases. It calls this suboptimal collapse and argues it arises from a self-reinforcing loop: when the model rarely samples trajectories near the ground truth, the relatively better sampled trajectories tend to lie in a low-quality region, and RL updates that favor them push probability further away from the truth. To break the loop without turning post-training into behavior cloning, the paper proposes Ground-Truth Neighborhood Regularization (GTN-R), which adds two constraints to the RL objective: maximize probability mass inside an interval around the true future value, and keep the conditional distribution inside that interval close to uniform. Experiments across several foundation models, RL methods, and datasets report that GTN-R mitigates collapse, preserves sampling variance, and improves forecasting over the corresponding RL baselines.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the ground-truth neighborhood $N_r(y_t) = [y_t - r, y_t + r]$, an interval of radius $r$ centered at each true future value, together with two distributional constraints built on it: the neighborhood probability mass constraint $L_{\text{mass}}$, defined as the mean log-probability mass inside the neighborhood (Eqs. 12–13), and the within-neighborhood uniformity constraint $L_{\text{uni}}$, defined as the negative KL divergence between the normalized predictive density inside the neighborhood and the uniform density (Eqs. 14–16). Their weighted sum is added to the original RL objective: $L_{\text{GTN-R}} = L_{\text{RL}} + \lambda_m L_{\text{mass}} + \lambda_u L_{\text{uni}}$ (Eq. 17). The mass term supplies the pull toward high-quality regions; the uniformity term preserves the spread that keeps the model exploring. Proposition 1 supplies the theoretical motivation: once a low-quality-dominated update occurs and amplifies a low-quality region relative to the ground-truth neighborhood (Eq. 7), the probability of further such updates grows and the neighborhood probability can tend to zero.

What would settle it

Track the ground-truth-neighborhood probability of individual forecast points throughout vanilla RL post-training; a point with high initial $p_0$ that nonetheless collapses below 0.001 would contradict Proposition 1's conditioning on low initial sampling difficulty.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that suboptimal collapse in RL post-training of probabilistic time series foundation models is caused by a self-reinforcing cycle: in forecast regions where the model rarely samples near the ground truth, the relatively better sampled trajectories tend to lie in a low-quality region, and RL updates that reward those trajectories further increase the probability of that region. Proposition 1 formalizes a sufficient version of this cycle under three conditions—initial sampling difficulty, low-quality-dominance, and relative amplification—and shows that if the relative amplification condition holds, the ground-truth-neighborhood probability can decay geometrically toward zero. The proposed remedy, GTN-R, does not put the ground-truth trajectory into the update; it treats the ground-truth neighborhood $N_r(y_t) = [y_t - r, y_t + r]$ as a reference region, maximizes the probability mass inside it, and forces the conditional distribution inside it toward uniform. The paper argues this both counters collapse and preserves exploration, and reports consistent MSE and MAE improvements across Moirai, Toto, Moirai-MoE, and UniTS under TPO, TimeRFT, and TS-GRPO.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical story stands on the relative-amplification condition (Eq. 7): when a low-quality region dominates an update, that region's probability grows at least $(1+\eta)$ times faster than the ground-truth neighborhood, and this is asserted from the generic behavior of RL rather than derived from the specific update rules.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any RL post-training method that reinforces relatively better sampled trajectories is susceptible to suboptimal collapse in regions where initial sampling near the ground truth is poor; GTN-R can be attached to such a method as a regularizer without changing its update rule.
Because the ground-truth trajectory never enters the update as a fixed high-reward sample, GTN-R should avoid degrading into behavior cloning; the paper's comparisons show its sampling variance stays higher than the direct-ground-truth variant.
The neighborhood mass and uniformity constraints provide a concrete mechanism for the reported MSE and MAE gains: more frequent sampling of high-quality trajectories plus preserved spread inside the neighborhood.
The method extends to zero-shot transfer: Table 3 reports gains when a model post-trained with GTN-R on one dataset is evaluated on another.
The uniformity term is what distinguishes GTN-R from simply adding the ground-truth sample, since it prevents probability mass from concentrating on only a few locations inside the neighborhood.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: Eq. 7's relative-amplification condition is stated about any RL update, so the same collapse mechanism should appear in RL post-training of other generative models with continuous outputs; GTN-R-style neighborhood constraints would be a natural transfer.
Beyond the paper: the neighborhood radius $r$ is chosen per dataset; tying $r$ to the predictive distribution's dispersion or to local noise levels would make the regularizer adaptive and remove a source of hyperparameter sensitivity.
Beyond the paper: the uniformity constraint acts like an entropy-like penalty restricted to the neighborhood, so GTN-R could be combined with standard entropy-regularized RL to address collapse and global exploration separately.
Beyond the paper: the paper's 'with GT' experiments suggest a broader principle—use ground truth as a reference region, not as a training sample—that could inform other RL fine-tuning pipelines where gold outputs are available but should not be imitated directly.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

GTN-R is a simple, plausible regularizer for RL post-training of probabilistic time series foundation models, and the empirical work is broad enough to back the main claim. Don't lean on the theory section; it formalizes a conjecture rather than proving a mechanism.

The paper identifies suboptimal collapse: during RL post-training, the predictive distribution in some regions drifts away from ground truth. The fix is to add two terms to the RL loss — one maximizing probability mass in a neighborhood around ground truth, one encouraging uniformity inside that neighborhood. That's a sensible way to pull the model toward good trajectories without collapsing to behavior cloning. The experiments cover several backbones (Moirai, Toto, Moirai-MoE, UniTS), three RL methods, eight datasets, and zero-shot transfer. Gains are modest but fairly consistent, and the 'with GT' control shows direct ground-truth inclusion hurts generalization, which is a useful sanity check.

Main weakness: Proposition 1. Eq. 7 assumes that when a low-quality-dominated update occurs, the probability of the low-quality region grows at least 1+η times faster than the ground-truth neighborhood. That is basically the collapse mechanism restated, not derived from a policy-gradient update or loss. The paper is candid that this is a possible failure mode, but calling it theoretical analysis overstates it. The empirical validation in Fig. 2a is retrospective: collapsed points are selected after training and shown to have had lower initial ground-truth-neighborhood probability. That is a correlation, not a causal test. Also: no error bars in the main tables, the neighborhood radius is tuned per dataset, and code isn't provided. These are real limits, but they don't refute the central empirical claim that GTN-R helps; they just make the size of the gains uncertain.

Who it's for: anyone doing RL post-training of probabilistic TSFMs, especially in energy, traffic, or weather forecasting. It deserves peer review. The referees should ask for variance estimates, code, and either a real derivation of Eq. 7 from an actual update or a clear statement that the theory is a formalized conjecture.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper identifies a phenomenon called suboptimal collapse in reinforcement learning (RL) post-training of probabilistic time series foundation models (TSFMs): during RL post-training, the predictive distribution in some forecast regions shifts away from the ground-truth neighborhood even as overall MSE decreases. The authors propose a mechanism based on initial sampling difficulty and self-reinforcing low-quality updates, formalize it in Proposition 1, and use it to motivate a regularization method, GTN-R, which adds two terms to the RL objective: a neighborhood probability mass constraint and a within-neighborhood uniformity constraint. The method is evaluated by integrating it into TPO, TimeRFT, and their own TS-GRPO across several TSFMs and datasets, with standard and zero-shot forecasting results reported in Tables 1 to 3. The paper also presents visualizations of the proposed mechanism and of the effect of directly adding the ground-truth trajectory to the sampled group.

Significance. If the empirical claim holds, the paper makes a useful practical contribution: a simple, model-agnostic regularization that improves RL post-training of probabilistic TSFMs and appears to preserve exploration better than directly adding the ground-truth trajectory. The experimental scope is broad—multiple TSFMs (Moirai, Toto, Moirai-MoE, UniTS), multiple RL methods (TPO, TimeRFT, TS-GRPO), standard and zero-shot settings—and the reported gains are consistent rather than cherry-picked. The paper also gives credit for identifying a phenomenon (suboptimal collapse) that practitioners may encounter. However, the theoretical analysis as presented does not establish the proposed mechanism: Proposition 1 rests on an assumed inequality that essentially contains the collapse phenomenon, and the empirical support in Fig. 2a is retrospective. The core contribution is therefore currently an empirical regularization technique whose mechanism is plausible but not proven. The absence of variance estimates, the per-dataset tuning of the neighborhood radius, and the lack of code further weaken the empirical claim's verifiability.

major comments (5)

[Theoretical Analysis, Eq. (7)] The 'relative amplification' condition in Eq. (7) is asserted rather than derived from any policy-gradient update, loss, or normalization scheme. Since Eq. (7) already states that the low-quality region S grows at least (1+η) times faster than the ground-truth neighborhood G, Eqs. (8) and (9) are conditional consistency results: if such an inequality holds, then G's probability decays geometrically. This does not establish that standard RL post-training produces this amplification or that initial sampling difficulty causes it. The theorem should be reframed either as a conditional statement with Eq. (7) explicitly labeled an assumption, or the authors should derive Eq. (7) from the specific RL objectives used (TPO, TimeRFT, TS-GRPO). As written, the theoretical contribution in contribution 1 is not supported.
[Empirical Analysis, Fig. 2a] The empirical validation of the collapse mechanism is retrospective: the authors first train the model, then select time points whose final ground-truth-neighborhood probability is below 0.001, and then show that these same points had lower initial ground-truth-neighborhood probability. This is close to a restatement of the selection criterion and does not provide independent evidence for the self-reinforcing mechanism. A prospective analysis—for example, fixing points by their initial probability and tracking their evolution, or comparing with a null model where final probabilities are randomized—would be needed to support the claim that initial sampling difficulty drives collapse.
[Experiments: Tables 1 to 3] All results are reported as five-seed averages without standard deviations, confidence intervals, or significance tests. Given that many reported improvements are small (e.g., Table 1, TPO+GTN-R vs. TPO on several datasets differs by 0.01–0.02 MSE), the reader cannot assess whether the improvements are statistically meaningful. Please report per-seed results or variance estimates, and where appropriate perform paired tests across seeds or evaluation horizons.
[Implementation Details] The neighborhood radius r is tuned per dataset (1 for Loop Seattle, 100 for ENTSO-e Load, 0.1 otherwise) and selected 'based on the hyperparameter sensitivity results,' but the main text does not report those results or a selection procedure. Because the mass and uniformity regularizers operate on the interval [y_t−r, y_t+r], the radius directly controls the strength of the regularization, and per-dataset tuning raises the question of whether the reported gains are robust to the choice of r. Please report the sensitivity analysis and, if possible, use a principled or fixed rule for r.
[Reproducibility] No code or training scripts are provided, and the paper introduces a new method (TS-GRPO) that is described only in the appendix. Given the dependence on exact RL implementations (advantage estimation, reward clipping, sampling schemes) and the per-dataset hyperparameters, the experiments are not currently reproducible from the manuscript alone. Releasing code and experimental configurations would materially strengthen the empirical claim.

minor comments (5)

[Overall Pipeline] The phrase 'Given a train date' appears to be a typo for 'Given a training data' or 'Given a training sample'; please correct.
[Figures 2 and 5] The notation '×101' in the sampling-variance panels is confusing; the caption says the actual variances are 10 times the plotted values, but the label reads as a power of ten. Please clarify the scaling notation.
[Empirical Analysis, 'with GT' setting] The ground-truth reward is clipped at 1.5 times the maximum sampled reward 'to prevent an excessively high ground-truth reward from compromising training stability,' but no analysis or justification is given for this particular clipping factor. Please provide a sensitivity check or a principled rationale.
[Method, Eq. (16)] The within-neighborhood uniformity constraint uses KL divergence between the normalized predictive distribution and the uniform distribution on the neighborhood; the text does not discuss what happens when the neighborhood probability mass is zero or extremely small, which can make the normalized density undefined. Please state how such cases are handled in the implementation.
[Related Work] Some citations appear to be to future or unpublished work (e.g., Li et al. 2026, Liu et al. 2026, Yan et al. 2026). Please verify that these references are publicly available and correctly dated, or mark them clearly as preprints with arXiv identifiers.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the GTN-R objective and its held-out test-set evaluation are self-contained, and Proposition 1 is an explicitly conditional statement rather than a hidden redefinition of the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claim, that GTN-R improves forecasting performance, is evaluated with external test-set MSE comparisons in Tables 1-3, which are not inputs to the GTN-R objective in Eq. 17; the regularizer directly maximizes ground-truth-neighborhood probability mass and within-neighborhood uniformity, but the reported performance gains are measured on held-out test sets, so the main claim does not reduce to the objective by construction. The theoretical Proposition 1 is explicitly conditional: the paper states 'Under the above conditions' and emphasizes that 'these conditions characterize a possible failure mode and need not hold for every update of a specific RL method.' The relative-amplification inequality (Eq. 7) is an assumption rather than a derived consequence of a specific policy-gradient update, and Eq. 9 is the mathematical consequence of that assumption; this makes the theory conditional, not circular. The retrospective selection in Fig. 2a, which identifies collapsed points after training and then compares their initial ground-truth-neighborhood probabilities, is a weak experimental design but is not a fitted parameter relabeled as a prediction, and it does not support the main MSE comparisons. Citations to prior RL post-training works such as Qi et al. 2025 and Li et al. 2026 are external to the present authors and are used for context, not as load-bearing self-citations. No equation in the paper was found to be equivalent to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The free parameters are the neighborhood radius and two regularization weights, all set by hand or by sensitivity search per dataset; the theoretical analysis adds three assumptions (initial sampling difficulty, low-quality-dominance, relative amplification) that together encode the collapse mechanism. No new physical or conceptual entities are posited.

free parameters (4)

neighborhood radius r = 1 (Loop Seattle), 100 (ENTSO-e Load), 0.1 (other datasets)
Chosen per dataset based on hyperparameter sensitivity results; directly defines the ground-truth neighborhood used in both regularization terms.
λ_m (neighborhood mass constraint weight) = 1
Weight of the neighborhood probability mass term in Eq. 17; set to 1 for all experiments.
λ_u (within-neighborhood uniformity weight) = 1
Weight of the KL-to-uniform term in Eq. 17; set to 1 for all experiments.
collapse threshold for empirical analysis = 0.001
A time point is labeled collapsed if its ground-truth-neighborhood probability falls below 0.001; this analysis threshold shapes the empirical evidence for suboptimal collapse.

assumptions (5)

ad hoc to paper Initial sampling difficulty: at some forecast points the model's initial probability p_k assigned to the ground-truth neighborhood is low.
Condition assumed in Proposition 1 (Theoretical Analysis) to start the collapse process; the paper observes it empirically but does not derive it from model properties.
ad hoc to paper Low-quality-dominance update: when no sampled prediction lies in G, the better trajectories lie in a fixed low-quality region S with probability at least rho (Eq. 6).
Assumption in Proposition 1; it names the fixed bad region and the probability of bad-batch domination without deriving either from the RL algorithm or from the data distribution.
ad hoc to paper Relative amplification: whenever a bad update occurs, the probability of S grows at least (1+eta) times faster than that of G (Eq. 7).
This is the load-bearing assumption: it already states the collapse dynamic the proposition is used to explain, and it is justified only by a generic citation that RL reinforces relatively better sampled trajectories.
domain assumption The fixed-radius interval [y_t-r, y_t+r] is a faithful high-quality region for every forecast point.
GTN-R maximizes probability mass inside these intervals; if the noise scale varies across points, a single tuned radius could distort the distribution rather than improve it.
domain assumption Within-neighborhood uniformity preserves exploration.
The paper assumes that matching the conditional density inside the neighborhood to uniform avoids the generalization loss observed when the ground-truth trajectory is directly included; this is validated only by sampling-variance curves.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Ground-Truth Neighborhood Regularization for Reinforcement Learning Post-Training of Time Series Foundation Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TSWMO2KN

@misc{pith2026260808010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Ground-Truth Neighborhood Regularization for Reinforcement Learning Post-Training of Time Series Foundation Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TSWMO2KN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08010}
}

read the original abstract

Time series forecasting (TSF) plays an important role in a wide range of real-world applications. Recently, time series foundation models (TSFMs), pretrained on large-scale datasets, have demonstrated strong generalization capabilities and emerged as an important paradigm for TSF. Reinforcement learning (RL) post-training has consequently attracted growing attention as a means of further improving their performance on downstream tasks. However, we find that, in certain forecast regions, RL post-training may gradually shift the output distributions of TSFMs away from the ground truth, thereby limiting their performance. We refer to this phenomenon as \textbf{suboptimal collapse}. Our analysis suggests that difficulty in initially sampling high-quality trajectories near the ground truth is an important contributing factor to suboptimal collapse. To address this issue, we propose Ground-Truth Neighborhood Regularization (GTN-R) for RL post-training of TSFMs. GTN-R uses the ground truth as a reference for locating high-quality regions and guides the model's probability mass toward the ground-truth neighborhood. This increases the probability of sampling high-quality trajectories, mitigates suboptimal collapse, and improves performance. Moreover, GTN-R can be flexibly integrated into various RL methods for TSFMs. Extensive experiments show its effectiveness.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08010 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** (a) Mean log probability assigned to the ground-truth neighborhoods of collapsed and non-collapsed points during [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Test-set forecasting performance with and without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Overall framework of our method. Overall Pipeline In this subsection, we introduce the overall pipeline of GTNR. Fig.4 illustrates the overall training framework of GTN-R. Specifically, we adopt a TSFM capable of producing predictive distributions as the backbone mod…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (a) Mean ground-truth-neighborhood log probability during training. (b) and sampling variance during training. (c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The output distributions for the training samples in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education

Clancey, William J. Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83)
[2]

Classification Problem Solving

Clancey, William J. Classification Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
[3]

, title =

Robinson, Arthur L. , title =. 1980 , doi =. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/208/4447/1019.full.pdf , journal =

1980
[4]

New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry

Robinson, Arthur L. New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry. Science
[5]

Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =

Diane Warner Hasling and William J. Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =. Strategic explanations for a diagnostic consultation system , journal =. 1984 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80003-6 , url =

doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(84)80003-6 1984
[6]

and Rennels, Glenn R

Hasling, Diane Warner and Clancey, William J. and Rennels, Glenn R. and Test, Thomas. Strategic Explanations in Consultation---Duplicate. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
[7]

Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

Rice, James. Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving
[8]

Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

Clancey, William J. Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

Show all 294 references

[9]

The Engineering of Qualitative Models

Clancey, William J. The Engineering of Qualitative Models
[10]

2023 , eprint=

Attention Is All You Need , author=. 2023 , eprint=

2023
[11]

Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet

NASA. Pluto: The 'Other' Red Planet
[12]

Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs

Harold Abelson and Gerald Jay Sussman and Julie Sussman. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. 1985

1985
[13]

Visual Information Extraction with Lixto

Robert Baumgartner and Georg Gottlob and Sergio Flesca. Visual Information Extraction with Lixto. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Databases. 2001

2001
[14]

Brachman and James G

Ronald J. Brachman and James G. Schmolze. An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science. 1985

1985
[15]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.00015 , year=

TimeRFT: Stimulating Generalizable Time Series Forecasting for TSFMs via Reinforcement Finetuning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.00015 , year=

arXiv
[16]

1991 , publisher=

Probability with martingales , author=. 1991 , publisher=

1991
[17]

Complexity results for nonmonotonic logics

Georg Gottlob. Complexity results for nonmonotonic logics. Journal of Logic and Computation. 1992

1992
[18]

Hypertree Decompositions and Tractable Queries

Georg Gottlob and Nicola Leone and Francesco Scarcello. Hypertree Decompositions and Tractable Queries. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 2002

2002
[19]

Levesque

Hector J. Levesque. Foundations of a functional approach to knowledge representation. Artificial Intelligence. 1984

1984
[20]

Levesque

Hector J. Levesque. A logic of implicit and explicit belief. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1984

1984
[21]

On the compilability and expressive power of propositional planning formalisms

Bernhard Nebel. On the compilability and expressive power of propositional planning formalisms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 2000

2000
[22]

ICLR , year=

TimesNet: Temporal 2D-Variation Modeling for General Time Series Analysis , author=. ICLR , year=
[23]

ICLR , year=

A Time Series is Worth 64 Words: Long-term Forecasting with Transformers , author=. ICLR , year=
[24]

ICLR , year=

Crossformer: Transformer utilizing cross-dimension dependency for multivariate time series forecasting , author=. ICLR , year=
[25]

NeurIPS , year=

SCINet: time series modeling and forecasting with sample convolution and interaction , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[26]

Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with

Haixu Wu and Jiehui Xu and Jianmin Wang and Mingsheng Long , journal=. Autoformer: Decomposition Transformers with
[27]

arXiv: 2012.07436 , year=

Informer: Beyond efficient transformer for long sequence time-series forecasting , author=. arXiv: 2012.07436 , year=

2012 arXiv
[28]

Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference , pages=

U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation , author=. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention--MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference , pages=. 2015 , organization=

2015
[29]

International conference on learning representations , year=

Pyraformer: Low-complexity pyramidal attention for long-range time series modeling and forecasting , author=. International conference on learning representations , year=
[30]

Expert Systems with Applications , volume=

DSTP-RNN: A dual-stage two-phase attention-based recurrent neural network for long-term and multivariate time series prediction , author=. Expert Systems with Applications , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

2020
[31]

NeurIPS , year=

Non-stationary Transformers: Rethinking the Stationarity in Time Series Forecasting , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[32]

Zhou, Tian and Ma, Ziqing and Wen, Qingsong and Wang, Xue and Sun, Liang and Jin, Rong , journal=
[33]

Oreshkin, Boris N and Carpov, Dmitri and Chapados, Nicolas and Bengio, Yoshua , journal=. N-
[34]

Attention is All you Need , year =

Vaswani, Ashish and Shazeer, Noam and Parmar, Niki and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Jones, Llion and Gomez, Aidan N and Kaiser, Lukasz and Polosukhin, Illia , journal =. Attention is All you Need , year =
[35]

, journal =

Ba, Jimmy Lei and Kiros, Jamie Ryan and Hinton, Geoffrey E. , journal =. Layer Normalization , year =
[36]

NeurIPS , year=

PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[37]

Kingma and Jimmy Ba , title =

Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba , title =. ICLR , year =
[38]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12886 , year=

N-HiTS: Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12886 , year=

arXiv
[39]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

High-dimensional multivariate forecasting with low-rank gaussian copula processes , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[40]

NeurIPS , year=

Deep state space models for time series forecasting , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[41]

SIGIR , year=

Modeling long-and short-term temporal patterns with deep neural networks , author=. SIGIR , year=
[42]

IET Intelligent Transport Systems , volume=

LSTM network: a deep learning approach for short-term traffic forecast , author=. IET Intelligent Transport Systems , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

2017
[43]

NeurIPS , year=

Language models are few-shot learners , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[44]

ICLR , year=

An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale , author=. ICLR , year=
[45]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361 , year=

Scaling laws for neural language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361 , year=

2001 arXiv
[46]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Set transformer: A framework for attention-based permutation-invariant neural networks , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2019 , organization=

2019
[48]

KDD , year=

TSMixer: Lightweight MLP-Mixer Model for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting , author=. KDD , year=
[49]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08424 , year=

Long-term Forecasting with TiDE: Time-series Dense Encoder , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08424 , year=

arXiv
[50]

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society

Some recent advances in forecasting and control , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics) , volume=. 1968 , publisher=

1968
[51]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 , year=

Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 , year=

arXiv
[52]

ICLR , year=

Reversible instance normalization for accurate time-series forecasting against distribution shift , author=. ICLR , year=
[53]

Neural networks , volume=

Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks , author=. Neural networks , volume=. 1991 , publisher=

1991
[54]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10721 , year=

Revisiting Long-term Time Series Forecasting: An Investigation on Linear Mapping , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10721 , year=

arXiv
[55]

ICLR , year=

Reformer: The efficient transformer , author=. ICLR , year=
[56]

ICML , year=

Flowformer: Linearizing transformers with conservation flows , author=. ICML , year=
[57]

ICML , year=

Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisited , author=. ICML , year=
[58]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00861 , year=

SimMTM: A Simple Pre-Training Framework for Masked Time-Series Modeling , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00861 , year=

arXiv
[59]

NeurIPS , year=

Flashattention: Fast and memory-efficient exact attention with io-awareness , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[60]

International Journal of Forecasting , volume=

DeepAR: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks , author=. International Journal of Forecasting , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

2020
[61]

NeurIPS , year=

Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision , author=. NeurIPS , year=
[62]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05206 , year=

The Capacity and Robustness Trade-off: Revisiting the Channel Independent Strategy for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.05206 , year=

arXiv
[63]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18803 , year=

Koopa: Learning Non-stationary Time Series Dynamics with Koopman Predictors , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18803 , year=

arXiv
[64]

Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , pages=

DSformer: a double sampling transformer for multivariate time series long-term prediction , author=. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , pages=
[65]

Human-Centric Intelligent Systems , volume=

Dbaformer: A double-branch attention transformer for long-term time series forecasting , author=. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[66]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , year=

Adam: A method for stochastic optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 , year=

arXiv
[67]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Attention is all you need , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[68]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=

Read like humans: Autonomous, bidirectional and iterative language modeling for scene text recognition , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages=
[69]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10882 , year=

Conditional positional encodings for vision transformers , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.10882 , year=

arXiv
[70]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

Towards accurate scene text recognition with semantic reasoning networks , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
[71]

European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

Robustscanner: Dynamically enhancing positional clues for robust text recognition , author=. European Conference on Computer Vision , pages=. 2020 , organization=

2020
[72]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=

SG-Former: Self-guided Transformer with Evolving Token Reallocation , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages=
[73]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=

Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision , pages=
[74]

International journal of environmental science and development , volume=

An efficient weather forecasting system using artificial neural network , author=. International journal of environmental science and development , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

2010
[75]

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , volume=

Forecasting methods in energy planning models , author=. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

2018
[76]

Renewable and sustainable energy reviews , volume=

Methods and tools for community energy planning: A review , author=. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

2015
[77]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Enhancing the locality and breaking the memory bottleneck of transformer on time series forecasting , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[78]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08317 , year=

Deep transformer models for time series forecasting: The influenza prevalence case , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08317 , year=

2001 arXiv
[79]

International Journal of Forecasting , volume=

Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting , author=. International Journal of Forecasting , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[80]

Noise reduction in speech processing , pages=

Pearson correlation coefficient , author=. Noise reduction in speech processing , pages=. 2009 , publisher=

2009
[81]

Probability Theory and Related Fields , volume=

The Wasserstein distance and approximation theorems , author=. Probability Theory and Related Fields , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

1985
[82]

Neural Information Processing: 27th International Conference, ICONIP 2020, Bangkok, Thailand, November 23--27, 2020, Proceedings, Part III 27 , pages=

SpringNet: Transformer and Spring DTW for time series forecasting , author=. Neural Information Processing: 27th International Conference, ICONIP 2020, Bangkok, Thailand, November 23--27, 2020, Proceedings, Part III 27 , pages=. 2020 , organization=

2020
[83]

Neural Networks , volume=

GBT: Two-stage transformer framework for non-stationary time series forecasting , author=. Neural Networks , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[84]

Applied Intelligence , volume=

Foreformer: an enhanced transformer-based framework for multivariate time series forecasting , author=. Applied Intelligence , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[85]

Applied Intelligence , volume=

Seformer: a long sequence time-series forecasting model based on binary position encoding and information transfer regularization , author=. Applied Intelligence , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[86]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05035 , year=

Does Long-Term Series Forecasting Need Complex Attention and Extra Long Inputs? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05035 , year=

arXiv
[87]

Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , pages=

GCformer: An Efficient Solution for Accurate and Scalable Long-Term Multivariate Time Series Forecasting , author=. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management , pages=
[88]

ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pages=

Preformer: predictive transformer with multi-scale segment-wise correlations for long-term time series forecasting , author=. ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pages=. 2023 , organization=

2023
[89]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.01772 , year=

Infomaxformer: Maximum Entropy Transformer for Long Time-Series Forecasting Problem , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.01772 , year=

arXiv
[90]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 , year=

Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861 , year=

arXiv
[91]

Neurocomputing , volume=

Roformer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding , author=. Neurocomputing , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[92]

1999 , publisher=

Elements of information theory , author=. 1999 , publisher=

1999
[93]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08248 , year=

How much position information do convolutional neural networks encode? , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08248 , year=

2001 arXiv
[94]

Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
[95]

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=

Estimation of KL divergence: Optimal minimax rate , author=. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

2018
[96]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=

Uniformer: Unifying convolution and self-attention for visual recognition , author=. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , year=
[97]

Bioinformatics , volume=

The mutual information: detecting and evaluating dependencies between variables , author=. Bioinformatics , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

2002
[98]

Biocomputing 2000 , pages=

Mutual information relevance networks: functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements , author=. Biocomputing 2000 , pages=. 1999 , publisher=

2000
[99]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

Multi-scale attention flow for probabilistic time series forecasting , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=
[100]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

Learning Informative Representation for Fairness-aware Multivariate Time-series Forecasting: A Group-based Perspective , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=
[101]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

Learning generative RNN-ODE for collaborative time-series and event sequence forecasting , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=
[102]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

Std: A seasonal-trend-dispersion decomposition of time series , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=
[103]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

Promptcast: A new prompt-based learning paradigm for time series forecasting , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=
[104]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=

Agree to Disagree: Personalized Temporal Embedding and Routing for Stock Forecast , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , year=
[105]

IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and data Engineering , volume=

Pattern discovery of fuzzy time series for financial prediction , author=. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and data Engineering , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

2006
[106]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.16557 , year=

S-GRPO: Unified Post-Training for Large Vision-Language Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.16557 , year=

arXiv
[107]

Wireless Personal Communications , volume=

Financial time series prediction based on deep learning , author=. Wireless Personal Communications , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

2018
[108]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.01271 , year=

An empirical evaluation of generic convolutional and recurrent networks for sequence modeling , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.01271 , year=

arXiv
[109]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08572 , year=

Caformer: Rethinking Time Series Analysis from Causal Perspective , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.08572 , year=

arXiv
[110]

Nature Reviews Earth & Environment , volume=

Causal inference for time series , author=. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[111]

2016 6th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMULTECH) , pages=

Future prediction of regional city based on causal inference using time-series data , author=. 2016 6th International Conference on Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications (SIMULTECH) , pages=. 2016 , organization=

2016
[112]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01185 , pages=

Multivariate time series forecasting based on causal inference with transfer entropy and graph neural network , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01185 , pages=

2005 arXiv
[113]

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=

Causal hidden markov model for time series disease forecasting , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages=
[114]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Learning causal semantic representation for out-of-distribution prediction , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[115]

2016 , publisher=

Causal inference in statistics: A primer , author=. 2016 , publisher=

2016
[116]

International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=

Generative causal representation learning for out-of-distribution motion forecasting , author=. International Conference on Machine Learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

2023
[117]

Probabilistic and causal inference: The works of Judea Pearl , pages=

External validity: From do-calculus to transportability across populations , author=. Probabilistic and causal inference: The works of Judea Pearl , pages=
[118]

Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=

Toward causal representation learning , author=. Proceedings of the IEEE , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

2021
[119]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02368 , year=

Timer: Generative pre-trained transformers are large time series models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.02368 , year=

arXiv
[120]

Postgraduate Medical Journal , volume=

ChatGPT , author=. Postgraduate Medical Journal , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

2023
[121]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 , year=

Proximal policy optimization algorithms , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 , year=

arXiv
[122]

The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

Fast-Slow Thinking GRPO for Large Vision-Language Model Reasoning , author=. The Thirty-ninth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , year=
[123]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21848 , year=

Edge-grpo: Entropy-driven grpo with guided error correction for advantage diversity , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.21848 , year=

arXiv
[124]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05428 , year=

Group Causal Policy Optimization for Post-Training Large Language Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.05428 , year=

arXiv
[125]

No Supervision, No Problem: Pure Reinforcement Learning Improves Mathematical Reasoning in Small Language Models , author=
[126]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18892 , year=

Simplerl-zoo: Investigating and taming zero reinforcement learning for open base models in the wild , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18892 , year=

arXiv
[127]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Multi-turn reinforcement learning with preference human feedback , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[128]

Adaptation, learning, and optimization , volume=

Reinforcement learning , author=. Adaptation, learning, and optimization , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

2012
[129]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07874 , year=

Toto: Time series optimized transformer for observability , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.07874 , year=

arXiv
[130]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10469 , year=

Moirai-moe: Empowering time series foundation models with sparse mixture of experts , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10469 , year=

arXiv
[131]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300 , year=

Deepseekmath: Pushing the limits of mathematical reasoning in open language models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03300 , year=

arXiv
[132]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05952 , year=

Prioritized experience replay , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05952 , year=

arXiv
[133]

Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Not all frequencies are created equal: Towards a dynamic fusion of frequencies in time-series forecasting , author=. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[134]

Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Boundary-Aware Periodicity-based Sparsification Strategy for Ultra-Long Time Series Forecasting , author=. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[135]

Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=

Digital twins fuzzy system based on time series forecasting model LFTformer , author=. Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages=
[136]

Information Sciences , volume=

A causal representation learning based model for time series prediction under external interference , author=. Information Sciences , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[137]

Caformer: Rethinking Time-Series Forecasting From Causal Perspective , author=
[138]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16308 , year=

CAIFormer: A Causal Informed Transformer for Multivariate Time Series Forecasting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16308 , year=
[139]

ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology , volume=

A survey on evaluation of large language models , author=. ACM transactions on intelligent systems and technology , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[140]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08271 , year=

LangTime: A Language-Guided Unified Model for Time Series Forecasting with Proximal Policy Optimization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08271 , year=

arXiv
[141]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08827 , year=

A survey of reinforcement learning for large reasoning models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.08827 , year=

arXiv
[142]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21560 , year=

Reinforcement Learning Fine-Tuning of Language Model for Instruction Following and Math Reasoning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.21560 , year=

arXiv
[143]

Intelligent Systems with Applications , volume=

Claude 2.0 large language model: Tackling a real-world classification problem with a new iterative prompt engineering approach , author=. Intelligent Systems with Applications , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[144]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , year=

Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805 , year=

arXiv
[145]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948 , year=

Deepseek-r1: Incentivizing reasoning capability in llms via reinforcement learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.12948 , year=

arXiv
[146]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[147]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15942 , year=

Timehf: Billion-scale time series models guided by human feedback , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.15942 , year=

arXiv
[148]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07912 , year=

Echo chamber: Rl post-training amplifies behaviors learned in pretraining , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07912 , year=

arXiv
[149]

Journal of artificial intelligence research , volume=

Reinforcement learning: A survey , author=. Journal of artificial intelligence research , volume=
[150]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11686 , year=

Representation-Based Exploration for Language Models: From Test-Time to Post-Training , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11686 , year=

arXiv
[151]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13697 , year=

RL in Name Only? Analyzing the Structural Assumptions in RL post-training for LLMs , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13697 , year=
[152]

ICLR 2025: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts , author=. ICLR 2025: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations , year=

2025
[153]

R0-FoMo: Robustness of Few-shot and Zero-shot Learning in Large Foundation Models , year=

Lag-llama: Towards foundation models for time series forecasting , author=. R0-FoMo: Robustness of Few-shot and Zero-shot Learning in Large Foundation Models , year=
[154]

Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , year=

A decoder-only foundation model for time-series forecasting , author=. Forty-first International Conference on Machine Learning , year=
[155]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Units: A unified multi-task time series model , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[156]

, author=

Entropy Regularization. , author=
[157]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03885 , year=

Moment: A family of open time-series foundation models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03885 , year=

arXiv
[158]

International conference on machine learning , pages=

Trust region policy optimization , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2015 , organization=

2015
[159]

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=

On computing the points and weights for Gauss--Legendre quadrature , author=. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

2003
[160]

Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =

Few-shot Domain Adaptation by Causal Mechanism Transfer , author =. Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =. 2020 , volume =

2020
[161]

2020 , publisher =

Zhang, Kun and Gong, Mingming and Stojanov, Petar and Huang, Biwei and Liu, Qingsong and Glymour, Clark , title =. 2020 , publisher =

2020
[162]

Learning Causal Representations for Robust Domain Adaptation , year=

Yang, Shuai and Yu, Kui and Cao, Fuyuan and Liu, Lin and Wang, Hao and Li, Jiuyong , journal=. Learning Causal Representations for Robust Domain Adaptation , year=
[164]

Toward Causal Representation Learning , year=

Schölkopf, Bernhard and Locatello, Francesco and Bauer, Stefan and Ke, Nan Rosemary and Kalchbrenner, Nal and Goyal, Anirudh and Bengio, Yoshua , journal=. Toward Causal Representation Learning , year=
[165]

Learning Causal Semantic Representation for Out-of-Distribution Prediction , url =

Liu, Chang and Sun, Xinwei and Wang, Jindong and Tang, Haoyue and Li, Tao and Qin, Tao and Chen, Wei and Liu, Tie-Yan , booktitle =. Learning Causal Semantic Representation for Out-of-Distribution Prediction , url =
[166]

Causal Intervention for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation , url =

Zhang, Dong and Zhang, Hanwang and Tang, Jinhui and Hua, Xian-Sheng and Sun, Qianru , booktitle =. Causal Intervention for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation , url =
[167]

Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributions , volume =

Magliacane, Sara and van Ommen, Thijs and Claassen, Tom and Bongers, Stephan and Versteeg, Philip and Mooij, Joris M , booktitle =. Domain Adaptation by Using Causal Inference to Predict Invariant Conditional Distributions , volume =
[168]

Statistical Science , number =

Pearl, Judea and Bareinboim, Elias , title =. Statistical Science , number =. 2014 , doi =

2014
[169]

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =

Elias Bareinboim and Judea Pearl , title =. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , volume =. 2016 , doi =

2016
[170]

Causal Generative Neural Networks , publisher =

Goudet, Olivier and Kalainathan, Diviyan and Caillou, Philippe and Guyon, Isabelle and Lopez-Paz, David and Sebag, Michèle , keywords =. Causal Generative Neural Networks , publisher =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1711.08936 , url =

doi arXiv
[171]

2019 , volume =

Yu, Yue and Chen, Jie and Gao, Tian and Yu, Mo , booktitle =. 2019 , volume =

2019
[172]

doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1910.01075 , author =

Learning Neural Causal Models from Unknown Interventions , publisher =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1910.01075 , author =

1910 doi arXiv
[173]

Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =

Robustly Disentangled Causal Mechanisms: Validating Deep Representations for Interventional Robustness , author =. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =. 2019 , volume =

2019
[174]

STGAT: Modeling Spatial-Temporal Interactions for Human Trajectory Prediction , year=

Huang, Yingfan and Bi, Huikun and Li, Zhaoxin and Mao, Tianlu and Wang, Zhaoqi , booktitle=. STGAT: Modeling Spatial-Temporal Interactions for Human Trajectory Prediction , year=
[175]

Social-STGCNN: A Social Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Network for Human Trajectory Prediction , year=

Mohamed, Abduallah and Qian, Kun and Elhoseiny, Mohamed and Claudel, Christian , booktitle=. Social-STGCNN: A Social Spatio-Temporal Graph Convolutional Neural Network for Human Trajectory Prediction , year=
[176]

Human Trajectory Forecasting in Crowds: A Deep Learning Perspective , year=

Kothari, Parth and Kreiss, Sven and Alahi, Alexandre , journal=. Human Trajectory Forecasting in Crowds: A Deep Learning Perspective , year=
[177]

Social GAN: Socially Acceptable Trajectories with Generative Adversarial Networks , year=

Gupta, Agrim and Johnson, Justin and Fei-Fei, Li and Savarese, Silvio and Alahi, Alexandre , booktitle=. Social GAN: Socially Acceptable Trajectories with Generative Adversarial Networks , year=
[178]

Social-BiGAT: Multimodal Trajectory Forecasting using Bicycle-GAN and Graph Attention Networks , volume =

Kosaraju, Vineet and Sadeghian, Amir and Mart\'. Social-BiGAT: Multimodal Trajectory Forecasting using Bicycle-GAN and Graph Attention Networks , volume =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , publisher =
[179]

and Torr, Philip H

Lee, Namhoon and Choi, Wongun and Vernaza, Paul and Choy, Christopher B. and Torr, Philip H. S. and Chandraker, Manmohan , booktitle=. DESIRE: Distant Future Prediction in Dynamic Scenes with Interacting Agents , year=
[180]

2020 , isbn =

Salzmann, Tim and Ivanovic, Boris and Chakravarty, Punarjay and Pavone, Marco , title =. 2020 , isbn =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58523-5_40 , booktitle =

2020 doi
[181]

2022 , doi =

Yuejiang Liu and Riccardo Cadei and Jonas Schweizer and Sherwin Bahmani and Alexandre Alahi , title =. 2022 , doi =

2022
[182]

Human Trajectory Prediction via Counterfactual Analysis , year=

Chen, Guangyi and Li, Junlong and Lu, Jiwen and Zhou, Jie , booktitle=. Human Trajectory Prediction via Counterfactual Analysis , year=
[183]

Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =

Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representations , author =. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning , pages =. 2019 , volume =

2019
[184]

2019 , copyright =

Arjovsky, Martin and Bottou, Léon and Gulrajani, Ishaan and Lopez-Paz, David , title =. 2019 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1907.02893 , url =

2019 doi arXiv
[185]

9th International Conference on Learning Representations,

Elan Rosenfeld and Pradeep Kumar Ravikumar and Andrej Risteski , title =. 9th International Conference on Learning Representations,
[186]

Deep Learning , author=
[187]

Causal inference in statistics: A primer , author=
[188]

2020 , issue_date =

Yu, Kui and Guo, Xianjie and Liu, Lin and Li, Jiuyong and Wang, Hao and Ling, Zhaolong and Wu, Xindong , title =. 2020 , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/3409382 , journal =

2020 doi
[189]

2022 , copyright =

Kivva, Bohdan and Rajendran, Goutham and Ravikumar, Pradeep and Aragam, Bryon , title =. 2022 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2206.10044 , url =

2022 doi arXiv
[190]

Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,

Zhuxi Jiang and Yin Zheng and Huachun Tan and Bangsheng Tang and Hanning Zhou , title =. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,. 2017 , doi =

2017
[191]

Johnson and David Duvenaud and Alexander B

Matthew J. Johnson and David Duvenaud and Alexander B. Wiltschko and Ryan P. Adams and Sandeep R. Datta , title =. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2016, December 5-10, 2016, Barcelona, Spain , pages =

2016
[192]

Density estimation using Real

Laurent Dinh and Jascha Sohl. Density estimation using Real. 5th International Conference on Learning Representations,
[193]

On the Necessity and Effectiveness of Learning the Prior of Variational Auto-Encoder , publisher =

Xu, Haowen and Chen, Wenxiao and Lai, Jinlin and Li, Zhihan and Zhao, Youjian and Pei, Dan , keywords =. On the Necessity and Effectiveness of Learning the Prior of Variational Auto-Encoder , publisher =. 2019 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1905.13452 , url =

2019 doi arXiv
[194]

2020 , isbn =

Mangalam, Karttikeya and Girase, Harshayu and Agarwal, Shreyas and Lee, Kuan-Hui and Adeli, Ehsan and Malik, Jitendra and Gaidon, Adrien , title =. 2020 , isbn =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58536-5_45 , booktitle =

2020 doi
[195]

Computer Graphics Forum , volume =

Lerner, Alon and Chrysanthou, Yiorgos and Lischinski, Dani , title =. Computer Graphics Forum , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01089.x , url =. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01089.x , abstract =

2007
[196]

Computer Vision -- ECCV 2010 , year=

Pellegrini, Stefano and Ess, Andreas and Van Gool, Luc , title=. Computer Vision -- ECCV 2010 , year=

2010
[197]

Kingma and Max Welling , title =

Diederik P. Kingma and Max Welling , title =. 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations,
[198]

International Conference on Robotics and Automation,

Changan Chen and Yuejiang Liu and Sven Kreiss and Alexandre Alahi , title =. International Conference on Robotics and Automation,. 2019 , doi =

2019
[199]

Journal of the American statistical Association , volume=

Variational inference: A review for statisticians , author=. Journal of the American statistical Association , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

2017
[200]

2015 , publisher=

Time series analysis: forecasting and control , author=. 2015 , publisher=

2015
[201]

Management science , volume=

Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages , author=. Management science , volume=. 1960 , publisher=

1960
[202]

2020 , publisher=

Time series analysis , author=. 2020 , publisher=

2020
[203]

IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , year=

NFIG-X: Non-linear fuzzy information granule series for long-term traffic flow time series forecasting , author=. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , year=
[204]

2024 , publisher=

Fourier analysis , author=. 2024 , publisher=

2024
[205]

Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=

Beyond low-frequency information in graph convolutional networks , author=. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume=
[206]

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , year=

Large Scale Time-Series Representation Learning via Simultaneous Low-and High-Frequency Feature Bootstrapping , author=. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , year=
[207]

Kidney international , volume=

Confounding: what it is and how to deal with it , author=. Kidney international , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

2008
[208]

Nephron Clinical Practice , volume=

Confounding , author=. Nephron Clinical Practice , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

2010
[209]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Unsupervised scalable representation learning for multivariate time series , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[210]

IEEE computational science and engineering , volume=

An introduction to wavelets , author=. IEEE computational science and engineering , volume=. 1995 , publisher=

1995
[211]

2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing-ICASSP'07 , volume=

Approximating the Kullback Leibler divergence between Gaussian mixture models , author=. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing-ICASSP'07 , volume=. 2007 , organization=

2007
[212]

The British journal for the philosophy of science , volume=

Indeterminism and the causal Markov condition , author=. The British journal for the philosophy of science , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

2005
[213]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Koopa: Learning non-stationary time series dynamics with koopman predictors , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[214]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02236 , year=

U-Mixer: An Unet-Mixer Architecture with Stationarity Correction for Time Series Forecasting , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02236 , year=

arXiv
[215]

IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , year=

Differential Convolutional Fuzzy Time Series Forecasting , author=. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , year=
[216]

1986 , publisher=

Time series analysis , author=. 1986 , publisher=

1986
[217]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

Non-stationary transformers: Exploring the stationarity in time series forecasting , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
[218]

Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=
[219]

Geomatic approaches for modeling land change scenarios , pages=

Multilayer perceptron (MLP) , author=. Geomatic approaches for modeling land change scenarios , pages=. 2018 , publisher=

2018
[220]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14087 , year=

Multi-Scale Finetuning for Encoder-based Time Series Foundation Models , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14087 , year=
[221]

Kullback-leibler divergence , author=
[222]

Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=

Particle Gibbs with ancestor sampling , author=. Journal of Machine Learning Research , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

2014
[223]

Abril and Robert Plant

Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant. The patent holder's dilemma: Buy, sell, or troll?. Communications of the ACM. doi:10.1145/1188913.1188915
[224]

Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries

Sarah Cohen and Werner Nutt and Yehoshua Sagic. Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries. doi:10.1145/1219092.1219093
[225]

Special issue: Digital Libraries. 1996

1996
[226]

Understanding Policy-Based Networking

David Kosiur. Understanding Policy-Based Networking
[229]

doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

The title of book two. doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

doi
[230]

Asad Z. Spector. Achieving application requirements. Distributed Systems. doi:10.1145/90417.90738
[231]

Douglass and David Harel and Mark B

Bruce P. Douglass and David Harel and Mark B. Trakhtenbrot. Statecarts in use: structured analysis and object-orientation. Lectures on Embedded Systems. doi:10.1007/3-540-65193-4_29

doi
[232]

Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 1: Fundamental Algorithms (3rd. ed.)
[233]

Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming
[234]

Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol)

Dan Geiger and Christopher Meek. Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol). Proceedings of Tenth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, The Barbados
[235]

Stan W. Smith. An experiment in bibliographic mark-up: Parsing metadata for XML export. Proceedings of the 3rd. annual workshop on Librarians and Computers
[236]

Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms

Matthew Van Gundy and Davide Balzarotti and Giovanni Vigna. Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms. Proceedings of the first USENIX workshop on Offensive Technologies
[237]

Predicate Path expressions

Sten Andler. Predicate Path expressions. Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. doi:10.1145/567752.567774
[238]

LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER

David Harel. LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER
[239]

Anisi , title =

David A. Anisi , title =
[240]

Clarkson

Kenneth L. Clarkson. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry)
[241]

Introduction to Bayesian Statistics

Harry Thornburg. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. 2001

2001
[242]

CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11

Rafal Ablamowicz and Bertfried Fauser. CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11. 2007

2007
[243]

Stats and Analysis

Poker-Edge.Com. Stats and Analysis. 2006

2006
[244]

A more perfect union

Barack Obama. A more perfect union
[245]

The fountain of youth

Joseph Scientist. The fountain of youth
[246]

Solder man

Dave Novak. Solder man. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Video Review on Animation theater Program: Part I - Vol. 145 (July 27--27, 2003). doi:10.945/woot07-S422

2003
[247]

Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005

Newton Lee. Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005. Comput. Entertain. doi:10.1145/1057270.1057278

2005
[248]

The Enabling of Digital Libraries

Bernard Rous. The Enabling of Digital Libraries. Digital Libraries
[250]

(new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =

Werneck, Renato and Setubal, Jo\. (new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =. doi:10.1145/351827.384253 , acmid = 384253, publisher =
[252]

and Mei, Alessandro , title =

Conti, Mauro and Di Pietro, Roberto and Mancini, Luigi V. and Mei, Alessandro , title =. Inf. Fusion , volume =. 2009 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002 , acmid =

2009 doi
[253]

and Hutchful, David K

Li, Cheng-Lun and Buyuktur, Ayse G. and Hutchful, David K. and Sant, Natasha B. and Nainwal, Satyendra K. , title =. CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358946 , acmid =
[254]

, title =

Hollis, Billy S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

1999
[255]

Goossens, Michel and Rahtz, S. P. and Moore, Ross and Sutor, Robert S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

1999
[256]

and Rosenberg, Arnold L

Buss, Jonathan F. and Rosenberg, Arnold L. and Knott, Judson D. , title =. 1987 , source =

1987
[257]

CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =

, note =. CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =
[258]

Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =

Clarkson, Kenneth Lee , advisor =. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =
[259]

SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. , year =
[260]

2004 , isbn =

IEEE TCSC Executive Committee , booktitle =. 2004 , isbn =. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2004.64 , acmid =

2004 doi
[261]

Distributed systems (2nd Ed.) , year =
[262]

, title =

Petrie, Charles J. , title =. 1986 , source =

1986
[263]

Donald E. Knuth. Seminumerical Algorithms. 1981

1981
[264]

E-commerce and cultural values , year =

Kong, Wei-Chang , Title =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =
[265]

E-commerce and cultural values , year =

Kong, Wei-Chang , type =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =
[266]

Chapter 9 , booktitle =

Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. Chapter 9 , booktitle =
[267]

E-commerce and cultural values , editor =

Kong, Wei-Chang , title =. E-commerce and cultural values , editor =. 2003 , isbn =

2003
[268]

E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =

Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =. 2004 , address =

2004
[269]

E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =

Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =. 2005 , address =

2005
[270]

E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =

Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =. 2006 , address =

2006
[271]

Microelectron

Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi , title =. Microelectron. J. , volume =. 2010 , pages =

2010
[272]

Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi and Zahra Sasanian , title =. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. , volume =
[273]

Kirschmer, Markus and Voight, John , title =. SIAM J. Comput. , issue_date =. 2010 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/080734467 , acmid =

2010 doi
[274]

Hoare, C. A. R. , title =. Structured programming (incoll) , editor =. 1972 , isbn =

1972
[275]

History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =

Lee, Jan , title =. History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =. 1981 , isbn =. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800025.1198348 , acmid =

1981
[276]

, title =

Dijkstra, E. , title =. Classics in software engineering (incoll) , year =
[277]

, title =

Wenzel, Elizabeth M. , title =. Multimedia interface design (incoll) , year =. doi:10.1145/146022.146089 , acmid =
[278]

, title =

Mumford, E. , title =. Critical issues in information systems research (incoll) , year =
[279]

and Golden, Donald G

McCracken, Daniel D. and Golden, Donald G. , title =. 1990 , isbn =

1990
[280]

The analysis of linear partial differential operators

H. The analysis of linear partial differential operators. 1985 , PAGES =

1985
[281]

IEEE", address =

A. Adya and P. Bahl and J. Padhye and A.Wolman and L. Zhou , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Broadnets Networks (BroadNets'04) , publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =
[282]

I. F. Akyildiz and W. Su and Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci , title =. Comm. ACM , volume = 38, number = "4", year =
[283]

I. F. Akyildiz and T. Melodia and K. R. Chowdhury , title =. Computer Netw. , volume = 51, number = "4", year =
[284]

ACM", address =

P. Bahl and R. Chancre and J. Dungeon , title =. Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'04) , publisher = "ACM", address = "New York, NY", year =
[285]

8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)

D. Culler and D. Estrin and M. Srivastava , title =. IEEE Comput. , volume = 37, number = "8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)", publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =
[286]

Natarajan and M

A. Natarajan and M. Motani and B. de Silva and K. Yap and K. C. Chua , title =. Network Architectures , editor =. 960935712
[287]

Tzamaloukas and J

A. Tzamaloukas and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves , title =
[288]

Zhou and J

G. Zhou and J. Lu and C.-Y. Wan and M. D. Yarvis and J. A. Stankovic , title =
[289]

Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes

Jacob Kornerup. Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes. 1994

1994
[290]

Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems

Michael Gerndt. Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems
[291]

J. E. Archer, Jr. and R. Conway and F. B. Schneider. User recovery and reversal in interactive systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
[292]

D. D. Dunlop and V. R. Basili. Generalizing specifications for uniformly implemented loops. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
[293]

Heering and P

J. Heering and P. Klint. Towards monolingual programming environments. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
[294]

Donald E. Knuth. The book
[295]

Korach and D

E. Korach and D. Rotem and N. Santoro. Distributed algorithms for finding centers and medians in networks. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
[296]

: A Document Preparation System

Leslie Lamport. : A Document Preparation System
[297]

F. Nielson. Program transformations in a denotational setting. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst
[298]

Brian K. Reid. A high-level approach to computer document formatting. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages
[299]

and Abdelzaher, Tarek F

Zhou, Gang and Wu, Yafeng and Yan, Ting and He, Tian and Huang, Chengdu and Stankovic, John A. and Abdelzaher, Tarek F. , title =. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/1721695.1721705 , acmid = 1721705, publisher =
[300]

Institutional members of the Users Group

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education

Clancey, William J. Communication, Simulation, and Intelligent Agents: Implications of Personal Intelligent Machines for Medical Education. Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-83)

[2] [2]

Classification Problem Solving

Clancey, William J. Classification Problem Solving. Proceedings of the Fourth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

[3] [3]

, title =

Robinson, Arthur L. , title =. 1980 , doi =. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/208/4447/1019.full.pdf , journal =

1980

[4] [4]

New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry

Robinson, Arthur L. New Ways to Make Microcircuits Smaller---Duplicate Entry. Science

[5] [5]

Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =

Diane Warner Hasling and William J. Clancey and Glenn Rennels , abstract =. Strategic explanations for a diagnostic consultation system , journal =. 1984 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7373(84)80003-6 , url =

doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(84)80003-6 1984

[6] [6]

and Rennels, Glenn R

Hasling, Diane Warner and Clancey, William J. and Rennels, Glenn R. and Test, Thomas. Strategic Explanations in Consultation---Duplicate. The International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

[7] [7]

Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

Rice, James. Poligon: A System for Parallel Problem Solving

[8] [8]

Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue

Clancey, William J. Transfer of Rule-Based Expertise through a Tutorial Dialogue