Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 31 references

Effects of high-pressure synthesis on phase formation and superconducting properties of PrFeAsO1-xFx

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read High-pressure annealing of PrFeAsO1-xFx raises Tc by up to 6 K in a narrow doping window, but lowers it by 2 K when overdoped.

desk verdict A systematic HP-HTS study of Pr1111 with plausible qualitative trends, but the headline +6 K Tc claim rests on uncontrolled baselines and needs re-measured controls. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08083 v1 pith:3Q3VFMH5 submitted 2026-08-08 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph

Priya Singh , Konrad Kwatek , Tatiana Zajarniuk , Tomasz Cetner , Jan Mizeracki , Shiv J. Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords iron-basedsuperconductorsoxypnictidesPrFeAsO1-xFxfluorinedopinghigh-pressuresynthesishotisostaticpressingsuperconductingtransitiontemperaturecriticalcurrentdensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the high gas-pressure and high-temperature synthesis (HP-HTS) recipe that improves other iron-based superconductors, 0.5 GPa, 950 degrees C, 1 h, works for the fluorine-doped oxypnictide PrFeAsO1-xFx across its superconducting dome. Using underdoped x = 0.2, optimal x = 0.3, and overdoped x = 0.5, it finds that the effect is strongly composition dependent: the treatment puts more fluorine into the lattice, suppresses impurity phases, and densifies the microstructure in the underdoped and optimal cases, raising the magnetic Tc by about 1 K and about 6 K respectively. In the overdoped case the same treatment pushes fluorine past the solubility limit, increases PrOF and PrAs impurity phases, and lowers Tc by about 2 K. A sympathetic reader should care because this defines a narrow optimization window for high-pressure processing of Pr1111 and explains why the recipe does not transfer uniformly from other iron-based families.

What carries the argument

The central object is the fluorine-substituted iron oxypnictide PrFeAsO1-xFx (the Pr1111 phase), which crystallizes in the tetragonal ZrCuSiAs-type structure with space group P4/nmm; fluorine substitution on the oxygen site is the doping knob that tunes superconductivity. The mechanism that carries the argument is the ex-situ HP-HTS step: pellets sealed in tantalum tubes under argon and processed at 0.5 GPa and 950 degrees C for 1 h. The argument combines XRD and Rietveld refinement to track phase purity and lattice parameters, EDX to measure actual fluorine content, SEM to assess densification and grain connectivity, magnetization measurements to extract Tc from ZFC and FC curves, and the Bean critical-state model to estimate Jc from hysteresis loops. These readouts separate the beneficial channel, in which more fluorine moves the carrier concentration toward the optimum of the doping dome, from the destructive channel, in which excess fluorine drives PrOF and PrAs segregation and residual strain broadens the superconducting transition.

What would settle it

Synthesize x = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 by both methods in one campaign from identical precursors, measure zero-field-cooled magnetization in the same applied field for all six samples, and check whether the HP-HTS samples still exceed their ambient-pressure partners by about 1 K and about 6 K while x = 0.5 sits about 2 K below; if those offsets do not reproduce, the reported composition-dependent effect would be an artifact of batch or field differences.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that ex-situ HP-HTS processing of PrFeAsO1-xFx acts mainly by increasing the actual fluorine content in the superconducting phase, with EDX values rising from about 0.12 to 0.19 for nominal x = 0.2, from about 0.20 to 0.25 for nominal x = 0.3, and to about 0.38 for nominal x = 0.5, while also improving phase purity and grain connectivity in the underdoped and optimal compositions. The consequence is a magnetic Tc increase of roughly 1 K for x = 0.2 and roughly 6 K for x = 0.3, together with a stronger diamagnetic response and reduced ZFC-FC splitting. Resistivity on x = 0.2 shows a slightly higher onset but a broader transition, which the authors attribute to residual lattice strain introduced by the high-pressure step. For x = 0.5, the extra fluorine does not enter the superconducting phase; instead it forms more PrOF and PrAs, weakening the diamagnetic response and reducing Tc by about 2 K. The paper concludes that enhanced fluorine incorporation, phase stability, and microstructural densification together govern the outcome, and that HP-HTS conditions need re-optimization for the Pr1111 system.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's quantitative conclusions are differences between HP-HTS samples and ambient-pressure samples from an earlier published study rather than same-batch controls, and the measurement fields differ between HP-HTS samples (20 Oe for x = 0.2 and x = 0.3, 100 Oe for x = 0.5) while the baseline fields are not stated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For the optimally doped composition x = 0.3, the magnetic Tc rises by about 6 K after HP-HTS, implying that the treatment can move Pr1111 closer to the top of its superconducting dome by putting more fluorine into the lattice.
  • For the underdoped composition x = 0.2, HP-HTS adds about 1 K to Tc but broadens the resistive transition, so the gains from fluorine incorporation are partly offset by residual structural inhomogeneity.
  • HP-HTS densifies all three compositions, yet the critical current density improves only marginally for x = 0.2, showing that density and improved grain connectivity alone do not substantially enhance current-carrying capability in Pr1111.
  • The overdoped composition x = 0.5 responds in the opposite direction: HP-HTS raises the measured fluorine content but also increases PrOF and PrAs impurity phases and lowers Tc by about 2 K, so the useful doping window for this processing route is narrow.
  • The same 0.5 GPa and 1 h recipe that improves CaKFe4As4, SmFeAsO0.8F0.2, and FeSe0.5Te0.5 does not transfer uniformly to Pr1111, so processing parameters must be re-optimized for each family and each fluorine concentration.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: a direct test of the claim that extra fluorine is the active channel would be a series of HP-HTS runs at fixed pressure and temperature but variable dwell time for x = 0.3; if Tc tracks the EDX-measured fluorine content step by step rather than the microstructure, the carrier-doping mechanism wins.
  • Editorial inference: because the overdoped x = 0.5 sample already shows the failure mode, a shorter dwell time or lower processing temperature at 0.5 GPa might incorporate part of the extra fluorine without nucleating PrOF and PrAs, possibly widening the useful doping window beyond the current results.
  • Editorial inference: the marginal Jc gain despite high density suggests that practical applications of Pr1111 will need flux-pinning engineering, such as second-phase nanoparticles or irradiation, rather than densification alone; the paper's data imply HP-HTS is a doping-tuning step rather than a current-carrying fix.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the effects of high gas pressure and high-temperature synthesis (HP-HTS, 0.5 GPa, 950 °C, 1 h) on PrFeAsO1-xFx with nominal x = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5. The authors compare HP-HTS-treated samples with ambient-pressure samples from their previous work [4] using XRD, SEM/EDX, magnetization, and (for x = 0.2 only) resistivity. They report improved densification and reduced impurity phases for x = 0.2 and x = 0.3, with magnetization Tcmag increases of about 1 K and 6 K respectively, and for x = 0.5 enhanced phase segregation with a about 2 K suppression of Tcmag. EDX indicates increased fluorine content after HP-HTS. The authors conclude that the effect of HP-HTS is composition-dependent, governed by fluorine incorporation, phase stability, and microstructure.

Significance. If the quantitative Tc enhancements at x = 0.3 were secure, the result would be a useful data point for the applicability of HP-HTS to 1111-type iron-based superconductors, particularly because the paper covers under-, optimal-, and overdoped compositions in a single systematic study. The qualitative structural and microstructural trends (reduced porosity, impurity evolution, lattice parameter changes) are plausible and well documented, and the authors are transparent about missing transport data for two compositions and about the difficulty of reliable measurements on small irregular specimens. However, the central quantitative claims rest on comparisons with previously published baselines measured under unreported fields, on normalized magnetization curves, and on EDX fluorine values without uncertainties. These issues prevent the paper from establishing its headline numbers as they stand.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III(iv), Fig. 5, Fig. 6(b)] The quantitative Tc shifts of about +1 K (x = 0.2), +6 K (x = 0.3), and -2 K (x = 0.5) rest entirely on comparing the HP-HTS samples with ambient-pressure samples reported in a previous publication [4], not with control samples synthesized and measured in the same campaign. In §III(iv), the x = 0.2_HIP and x = 0.3_HIP samples are stated to have been measured in 20 Oe and the x = 0.5_HIP sample in 100 Oe, but the measurement fields used for the [4] baselines are not given. Because the magnetization onset in polycrystalline 1111 superconductors is field-sensitive, and because no error bars or reproducibility data are reported, the claimed enhancements and suppression could be consequences of measurement-field mismatch, batch-to-batch variation, or different onset criteria rather than of the HP-HTS process itself. The abstract, §IV, and the conclusion present these differences as established effects; they should be either supported by matched controls and uncertainty estimates or explicitly reframed as preliminary.
  2. [§III(iv), Fig. 5(a-c)] The magnetization data in Fig. 5 are plotted as M/M5K, that is, normalized to the value at 5 K. The text uses these curves to claim that x = 0.2_HIP and x = 0.3_HIP exhibit a 'stronger diamagnetic response' and reduced ZFC-FC separation, and that x = 0.5_HIP shows a 'weaker diamagnetic response.' Such conclusions cannot be drawn from normalized curves, because normalization forces all curves to the same value at 5 K and removes the absolute magnitude of the diamagnetic signal. Any statement about enhanced or degraded superconducting connectivity requires absolute magnetization data (with sample mass and, ideally, demagnetization corrections) or at least raw moment data; the present normalized plots only compare the shape of the transition relative to each sample's own 5 K value.
  3. [§IV, Fig. 6(a)] The central mechanistic claim that HP-HTS enhances fluorine incorporation is based on EDX-derived values of x_act, but no error bars, detection limits, or measurement statistics are provided for these values. EDX quantification of fluorine, a light element, in a multiphase material is subject to large uncertainties, and the authors themselves acknowledge 'larger uncertainty' for the x = 0.5_HIP sample. Without uncertainty estimates, the reported differences (for example, x_act ≈ 0.20 → 0.25 for nominal x = 0.3) cannot be assessed for significance. The x_act values should be reported with uncertainties and, ideally, corroborated by an independent technique before the fluorine-incorporation mechanism is used to explain the Tc changes.
  4. [§III(iii), §III(iv), §V Conclusion] The about 6 K enhancement at x = 0.3 and the about 2 K suppression at x = 0.5 are based solely on a single magnetization-onset value for each composition; no transport measurements, AC susceptibility, or repeated measurements are available for these samples. The absence of transport data is acknowledged in §III(iii), but the conclusion section still states the Tc changes as definitive. This is especially concerning because the one resistivity measurement that was performed (x = 0.2_HIP, Fig. 4) shows a broadened transition, indicating significant inhomogeneity; a single onset value may therefore not be representative of the bulk. Reproducibility on multiple samples and an independent probe of the superconducting transition are needed to secure the quantitative Tc claims.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Magnetic measurements reveal increased in the superconducting transition temperature' is grammatically incomplete; it should read 'reveal an increase in the superconducting transition temperature.'
  2. [§II] The phrase 'following the procedure reported previously [7], [4]' appears to misattribute the HP-HTS procedure; reference [4] is the ambient-pressure phase diagram paper, while the HP-HTS method is described in [11] and [7]. Please correct the citation.
  3. [§III(iv)] The opening of §III(iv) refers to 'x = 0.2_HP', which is inconsistent with the notation 'x = 0.2_HIP' used elsewhere; the typo should be fixed.
  4. [Fig. 5(d)] The literature Jc data from [12], [15], and [18] are included without specifying the measurement temperature, field, or criteria used in those studies; if they are not at the same conditions as the PrFeAsO0.8F0.2 data (5 K, with the same Jc definition), the comparison in Fig. 5(d) is misleading and should be annotated with the relevant conditions.
  5. [Data availability] The data availability statement says the raw data 'cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.' Given the lack of error bars and the dependence on previously published baselines, making the raw magnetization and EDX data available would substantially strengthen the reproducibility of the quantitative claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No constructional circularity; quantitative Tc shifts rely on same-group prior baselines but are newly measured, so score is low.

full rationale

This is an experimental paper with no fitted parameters, no derived equations, and no prediction that reduces to its inputs. The only self-citation that is load-bearing is reference [4], which supplies the ambient-pressure Tc baselines and phase-diagram assignments. The paper states that 'the results are compared with those of the corresponding CSP-AP processed Pr1111 samples reported previously [4]' (Sec. III(iv)), and it notes that measurements for x = 0.2_HIP and x = 0.3_HIP were performed in 20 Oe while x = 0.5_HIP was measured in 100 Oe. This is a legitimate comparison to previously published data rather than a definitional identity: the HP-HTS magnetization, XRD, SEM, and EDX data are new measurements, and the claimed ~1 K, ~6 K, and ~2 K shifts are not forced by construction. Whether the baseline is fully matched in batch, measurement field, and onset criterion is an experimental-design concern, not circularity. Accordingly the circularity score is 1, reflecting a minor self-citation that does not make the central claim equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's claims rest on standard experimental characterizations. The main unstated premises are the representativeness of EDX and magnetization as bulk measures, and the comparability of the present HP-HTS samples to previously published ambient-pressure baselines. The study introduces no free parameters or invented entities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption EDX compositional analysis accurately reflects the actual fluorine content incorporated into the PrFeAs(O,F) phase.
    Used to infer enhanced fluorine incorporation from x_act values; the authors acknowledge large EDX uncertainty for x=0.5 due to secondary phases (Section IV, Figure 6(a)).
  • domain assumption ZFC magnetization onset (Tcmag) is a reliable proxy for the bulk superconducting transition temperature.
    Used to quantify Tc changes, especially the ~6 K enhancement for x=0.3; no transport data are available for that sample and shielding fractions were not quantified (Section III (iv)).
  • domain assumption Ambient-pressure baseline samples from previous work [4] are directly comparable to the HP-HTS samples measured here.
    All Tc changes are quoted relative to values from Ref. [4]; measurement fields may differ (20 Oe for x=0.2_HIP and x=0.3_HIP, 100 Oe for x=0.5_HIP), and baseline fields are not stated (Section III (iv)).
  • standard math The Bean critical-state model applies to these porous polycrystalline samples for Jc estimation.
    Used to convert M-H loops to Jc for x=0.2; the model assumes a homogeneous critical state, which is questionable for samples with porosity and secondary phases (Section III (iv)).
  • standard math XRD phase identification via the PDF4+ database correctly distinguishes PrFeAs(O,F) from PrOF, PrAs, and FeAs impurities.
    The central structural conclusions about phase purity rely on these assignments (Figure 1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effects of high-pressure synthesis on phase formation and superconducting properties of PrFeAsO1-xFx." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3Q3VFMH5

@misc{pith2026260808083,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effects of high-pressure synthesis on phase formation and superconducting properties of PrFeAsO1-xFx},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3Q3VFMH5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08083}
}
read the original abstract

Motivated by recent reports of enhanced superconducting performance in several families of iron-based superconductors (IBS) processed by high-pressure (HP) synthesis, we investigate the influence of high gas pressure and high-temperature synthesis (HP-HTS) process on the structural, microstructural, electrical transport, and magnetic properties of Pr-based oxypnictide PrFeAsO1-xFx (Pr1111) using the processing conditions of 0.5 GPa for 1 h previously optimized for other IBS families. Representative underdoped (x = 0.2), optimal doped (x = 0.3), and overdoped (x = 0.5) compositions from the ambient-pressure electronic phase diagram of Pr1111 are selected to evaluate its composition-dependent effects of HP-HTS. The results demonstrate that HP-HTS enhances fluorine incorporation, improves phase formation, and produces a denser microstructure with improved grain connectivity in the underdoped and optimal doped compositions. Magnetic measurements reveal increased in the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) of ~1 K for x = 0.2 and ~6 K for x = 0.3, whereas only a marginal improvement in the critical current density is observed. Electrical resistivity measurements of the underdoped composition show a slight increase in Tc accompanied by a broader resistive transition, indicating residual structural inhomogeneity. In contrast, the overdoped composition exhibits increased impurity phase segregation, accompanied by suppression of superconductivity. These results demonstrate that the effectiveness of HP-HTS in Pr1111 is strongly composition dependent and governed by the interplay among fluorine incorporation, phase stability, and microstructural evolution, highlighting the need for further optimization of the HP-HTS processing conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [4]

    Electronic phase diagram and enhanced superconduct ivity in fluorine-doped PrFeAsO 1-xFₓ,

    P. Singh, K. Kwat ek, T. Zajarniuk, T. Palasyuk, C. Jastrz ębski, A. Szewczyk, S. J. Singh, “Electronic phase diagram and enhanced superconduct ivity in fluorine-doped PrFeAsO 1-xFₓ,” J. Alloys Compd., vol. 1072 , p. 188942 , 2026

    work page 2026

  2. [1]

    Iron- Based Layered Superconductor La[O 1-xFx]FeAs ( x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K,

    Y . Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano and H. Hosono, “Iron- Based Layered Superconductor La[O 1-xFx]FeAs ( x = 0.05−0.12) with Tc = 26 K,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 130, p. 3296, 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [2]

    Phase diagram and superconductivity at 58.1 K in α-FeAs-free SmFeAsO 1− xFx,

    M Fujioka et al., “Phase diagram and superconductivity at 58.1 K in α-FeAs-free SmFeAsO 1− xFx,” Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 26, p. 085023, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [3]

    Revisiting the Electron- Doped SmFeAsO: Enhanced Superconductivity up to 58.6 K by Th and F Codoping,

    X.-C. Wang, J. Yu, B.-B. Ruan, B.-J. Pan, Q.-G. Mu, T. Liu, K. Zhao, G.-F. Chen and Z.-A. Ren, “Revisiting the Electron- Doped SmFeAsO: Enhanced Superconductivity up to 58.6 K by Th and F Codoping,” Chin. Phys. Lett., vol. 34, p. 077401, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Pnictogen height as a possible switch between high- nodeless and low- nodal pairings in the iron-based superconductors,

    K. Kuroki, H. Usui, S. Onari, R. Arita and H. Aoki, “Pnictogen height as a possible switch between high- nodeless and low- nodal pairings in the iron-based superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 79, p. 224511 , 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Hydrostatic and Uniaxial Pressure Tuning of Iron- Based Superconductors: Insights into Superconductiv ity, Magnetism, Nematicity, and Collapsed Tetragonal Transitions,

    E. Gati, L. Xiang, S. L. Bud’ko, and P. C. Canfield , “Hydrostatic and Uniaxial Pressure Tuning of Iron- Based Superconductors: Insights into Superconductiv ity, Magnetism, Nematicity, and Collapsed Tetragonal Transitions,” ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, vol. 532, p. 2000248, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    High-pressure growth effect on the properties of high-Tc iron-based superconductors: A short review,

    P. Singh, M. Manasa, M. Azam and S. J. Singh, “High-pressure growth effect on the properties of high-Tc iron-based superconductors: A short review,” Cryogenics, vol. 147, p. 104028, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Pressure evolution of the low- temperature crystal structure and bonding of the superconductor FeSe ( Tc=37 K),

    S. Margadonna, Y . Takabayashi, Y . Ohishi, Y . Mizuguchi, Y . Ta kano, T. Kagayama, T. Nakagawa, M. Takata, and K. Prassides, “Pressure evolution of the low- temperature crystal structure and bonding of the superconductor FeSe ( Tc=37 K),” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 80, p. 064506 , 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 31 references
  1. [9]

    Superconductiv ity at 43 K in an iron -based layered compound LaO 1-xFxFeAs,

    H. Takahashi, K. Igawa, K. Arii, Y . Kamihara, M. Hirano & H. Hosono , “Superconductiv ity at 43 K in an iron -based layered compound LaO 1-xFxFeAs,” Nature, vol. 453, p. 376–378 , 2008

    2008

  2. [10]

    Superconductivity at 52 K i n hydrogen-substituted LaFeAsO (1-x)Hx under high pressure,

    H. Takahashi, H. Soeda, M. Nukii, C. Kawashima, T. Nakanishi, S. Iimura, Y . Muraba, S. Matsuishi & H. Hosono, “Superconductivity at 52 K i n hydrogen-substituted LaFeAsO (1-x)Hx under high pressure,” Sci. Rep., vol. 5, p. 7829, 2015

    2015

  3. [11]

    High Gas Pressure and High- Temperature Synthesis (HP-HTS) Technique and Its Im pact on Iron- Based Superconductors,

    M. Azam, M. Manasa, A. Morawski, T. Cetner and S. J . Singh, “High Gas Pressure and High- Temperature Synthesis (HP-HTS) Technique and Its Im pact on Iron- Based Superconductors,” Crystals, vol. 13, p. 1525, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Enhancement of Superconducting Properties o f Polycrystalline CaKFe 4As 4 by High- Pressure Growth,

    M. Manasa, M Azam, T. Zajarniuk, R. Di duszko, T. Cetner, A. Morawski, A. Wisniewski, S. J. Singh, “Enhancement of Superconducting Properties o f Polycrystalline CaKFe 4As 4 by High- Pressure Growth,” IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, vol. 34, p. 7300605, 2024. 21

    2024

  5. [13]

    Effect of impurity phase and high- pressure synthesis on the superconducting propertie s of CaKFe 4As 4,

    M. Manasa, M. A zam, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. Cetner, A. Morawski, A. Wisniewski, S. J. Singh, “Effect of impurity phase and high- pressure synthesis on the superconducting propertie s of CaKFe 4As 4,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, vol. 190, p. 111996, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Enhancement of the Superconducting Transition Temp erature in Mn-doped CaKFe 4As 4 Processed by the High gas-pressure and High-temperature Synthesis Method,

    M. Manasa, M. Azam, T. Zajarniuk, S. Stelmakh, T. C etner, A. Morawski, Shiv J. Singh , “Enhancement of the Superconducting Transition Temp erature in Mn-doped CaKFe 4As 4 Processed by the High gas-pressure and High-temperature Synthesis Method,” J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., vol....

    2026

  7. [15]

    Hig h-pressure growth effects on the superconducting properties of Sm-based oxypnictide superconductors,

    M Azam, M. Manasa, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. Pa lasyuk, T. Cetner, A. Morawski, C. Jastrz ębski, A. Szewczyk, M. Wierzbicki, S. J. Singh, “Hig h-pressure growth effects on the superconducting properties of Sm-based oxypnictide superconductors,” Ceramics International, vol....

    2025

  8. [16]

    Fluorine substitution- dependent phase diagram and superconducting propert ies of Sm-based oxypnictides synthesized by a high-pressur e growth technique,

    M. Azam, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T. Palasyuk, C. Jastrzebski, A. Sz ewczyk, H. Ogino, and S. J. Singh, “Fluorine substitution- dependent phase diagram and superconducting propert ies of Sm-based oxypnictides synthesized by a high-pressur e growth technique,” J. Mater. Sci: ...

    2026

  9. [17]

    O ptimization of superconducting properties of F-doped SmFeAsO by cubic anvil high-pressure tec hnique,

    M. Azam, T. Zajarniuk, H. Ogino and S. J. Singh, “O ptimization of superconducting properties of F-doped SmFeAsO by cubic anvil high-pressure tec hnique,” Mater. Res. Express., vol. 12, p. 116001, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    High- Pressure Synthesis and the Enhancement of the Superconducting Properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ,

    M Azam, M. Manasa, T. Zajarniuk, R. Diduszko, T . Cetner, A. Morawski, J. Wieckowski, A. Wisniewski, S. J. Singh, “High- Pressure Synthesis and the Enhancement of the Superconducting Properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 ,” Materials, vol. 16, p. 5358, 2023

    2023

  11. [19]

    Praseodymium doping effect on the superconducting properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 bulks under ambient and high- pressure growth conditions,

    P. Singh, M. Manasa, M. Azam, T. Zajarniuk, S. Ste lmakh, T. Palasyuk et al., “Praseodymium doping effect on the superconducting properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 bulks under ambient and high- pressure growth conditions,” Physica C: Supercond. its Appl., vol. 633, p. 1354729, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Comparison of Gd addition effect on the superconducting properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 bulks under ambient and high- pressure conditions,

    M. Manasa, M. Azam, T. Z ajarniuk, R. Diduszko, J. Mizeracki, T. Cetner et al., “Comparison of Gd addition effect on the superconducting properties of FeSe 0.5 Te 0.5 bulks under ambient and high- pressure conditions,” Ceramics International, vol. 50, pp. 714-725, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Bulk and single crys tal growth progress of iron- based superconductors (FBS): 1111 and 1144,

    S. J. Singh and M. I. Sturza, “Bulk and single crys tal growth progress of iron- based superconductors (FBS): 1111 and 1144,” Crystals, vol. 12, p. 20, 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Single c rystals of LnFeAsO 1-xFx (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd) and Ba 1-xRb xFe 2As 2: Growth, structure and superconducting properties,

    J. Karpinski, N.D. Zhigadlo, S. Katrych, Z. Bukowski, P . Moll, S. Weyeneth et al., “Single c rystals of LnFeAsO 1-xFx (Ln = La, Pr, Nd, Sm, Gd) and Ba 1-xRb xFe 2As 2: Growth, structure and superconducting properties,” Physica C, vol. 469, p. 370–380, 2009

    2009

  15. [23]

    Superconductivity at 52 K in iron based F doped layered quaternary compound Pr[O 1– xFx]FeAs,

    Z. -A. Ren, J. Yang, W. Lu. W. Yi, G. -C. Che, X. - L. Dong, L. -L. Sun and Z. -X. Zhao, “Superconductivity at 52 K in iron based F doped layered quaternary compound Pr[O 1– xFx]FeAs,” Materials Research Innovations, vol. 12, p. 105, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Effect of Mn substitution on superconductivity in 22 PrFeAs(O,F): Role of magnetic impurities,

    Priya Singh , Konrad Kwatek , Tatiana Zajarniuk, Taras Palasyuk , Cezariusz Jastrz ębski , And rzej Szewczyk , Michał Wierzbicki, Shiv J. Singh, “Effect of Mn substitution on superconductivity in 22 PrFeAs(O,F): Role of magnetic impurities,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of...

    2026

  17. [25]

    Superconductivity in the iron-b ased F-doped layered quaternary compound Nd[O 1 − xFx]FeAs,

    Zhi-An Ren et al , “Superconductivity in the iron-b ased F-doped layered quaternary compound Nd[O 1 − xFx]FeAs,” EPL, vol. 82, p. 57002, 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    High gas pressure for HTS single crystals and thin layer technology,

    A. Morawski, T. Lada, A. Paszewin, K. Przybylski, “ High gas pressure for HTS single crystals and thin layer technology,” Supercond. Sci. Technol. , vol. 11, p. 193, 1998

    1998

  19. [27]

    Grain boundar y characteristics of Fe-ba sed superconductors,

    K. Iida, J. Hänisch and A. Yamamoto, “Grain boundar y characteristics of Fe-ba sed superconductors,” Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 33, p. 043001, 2020

    2020

  20. [28]

    Effect of pressure on normal and superconducting state properties of iron based superconductor PrFeAsO 0.6 Fy (y = 0.12, 0.14),

    S. Arumugam, C. Ganguli, R. Thiyagarajan, D. Bhoi, G. Kalai Selvan, K. Manikandan, A. Pariari, P. Mandal & Y . Uwatoko, “Effect of pressure on normal and superconducting state properties of iron based superconductor PrFeAsO 0.6 Fy (y = 0.12, 0.14),” Sci. Rep., vol. 7, p. 11731, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Magnetization of High-Field Superconductors,

    C. P. Bean, “Magnetization of High-Field Superconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 36, p. 31, 1964

    1964

  22. [30]

    Effect of Structural Parameters on Superconductivity in Fluorine-Free LnFeAsO 1-y (Ln = La,Nd),

    C.-H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, H. Kito, M. T. F.-Diaz, T. Ito et al., “Effect of Structural Parameters on Superconductivity in Fluorine-Free LnFeAsO 1-y (Ln = La,Nd),” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 77, p. 083704, 2008

    2008

  23. [31]

    Maximizing the Fermi- surface multiplicity optimizes the superconducting state of iron pnictide compounds,

    H. Usui and K. Kuroki, “Maximizing the Fermi- surface multiplicity optimizes the superconducting state of iron pnictide compounds,” Phys. Rev. B , vol. 84, p. 024505, 2011. 23 Figure 1 : Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of PrFeAsO 1-xFx samples synthesized by the CSP- A...

    2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.