Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 91 references

Opposite post-processing orders of fermionic horizon channels and their quantum-resource monotonicity

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read As the horizon parameter q grows, exterior fermionic channels degrade while interior channels improve.

desk verdict Clean channel-ordering proof that unifies a pile of case-by-case relativistic QI resource calculations; sound within its declared single-mode model. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08215 v1 pith:OKA57UAW submitted 2026-08-08 quant-ph gr-qc

Shuhao Li , Jin-Ming Liu This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phgr-qc
keywords relativisticquantuminformationHawking–Unruheffectchannelpost-processingresourcetheoriesfermionichorizonchannelsexteriorandinteriorsectorscoherenceGHSdilatonblackhole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Many relativistic quantum-information studies report a recurring pattern: as the Hawking/Unruh parameter grows, quantum resources in the physically accessible exterior sector decrease, while resources in the inaccessible interior sector often increase. This paper argues that the pattern is not an accident of particular states or measures: it follows from the channel structure of the fermionic horizon transformation. The paper models the effective single-mode, two-level fermionic mode transformation as a pair of complementary exterior and interior quantum channels and proves that these two channel families have opposite post-processing orders as the parameter $q$ grows. Because the order is at the channel level, every state functional that is non-increasing under the corresponding intermediate maps is non-increasing in homogeneous exterior sectors and non-decreasing in homogeneous interior sectors. This applies to entanglement and occupation-basis coherence monotones, optimized Bell-functional values, and contractive-divergence correlation measures, as illustrated numerically with QJSD collective coherence in the GHS spacetime.

What carries the argument

The central object is the effective single-mode, two-level fermionic mode transformation of Eq. (1): $|0\rangle \mapsto \sqrt{1-q}\,|0\rangle_{\mathrm{out}}|0\rangle_{\mathrm{in}} + \sqrt{q}\,|1\rangle_{\mathrm{out}}|1\rangle_{\mathrm{in}}$ and $|1\rangle \mapsto |1\rangle_{\mathrm{out}}|0\rangle_{\mathrm{in}}$. Tracing over the inaccessible output gives the exterior channel $E_q^{\mathrm{out}}$; tracing over the complementary output gives the interior channel $E_q^{\mathrm{in}}$. The proof of the opposite orders uses the post-processing preorder $M \succeq_{\mathrm{deg}} N \iff N = \Theta \circ M$ for some CPTP map $\Theta$, with intermediate maps $E_p^{\mathrm{out}}$ for the exterior family and the amplitude-damping channel $D_\eta$ for the interior family. The multipartite extension tensors these local channels over the affected modes, requiring the mode transformations to act locally and independently. The machinery is channel-level: it does not depend on the input state, the particular spacetime, or the chosen resource measure, beyond the requirement that the functional be non-increasing under the intermediate maps.

What would settle it

A concrete test is to compute a homogeneous exterior-sector resource monotone for a fully multimode fermionic field state near a horizon and check whether the value increases with $q$; any such increase would violate the predicted universal non-increase. Alternatively, one can check Eq. (8) directly for a two-mode input state where the mode transformation does not factorize locally and see whether $E_{q_2}^{\mathrm{out}}$ can still be written as $E_p^{\mathrm{out}} \circ E_{q_1}^{\mathrm{out}}$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For $0<q_1<q_2<1/2$, the exterior channel family satisfies the exact composition $E_{q_2}^{\mathrm{out}} = E_p^{\mathrm{out}} \circ E_{q_1}^{\mathrm{out}}$ with $p = (q_2 - q_1)/(1 - q_1)$, so $E_{q_1}^{\mathrm{out}}$ is above $E_{q_2}^{\mathrm{out}}$ in the post-processing preorder. The interior family satisfies the reverse relation $E_{q_1}^{\mathrm{in}} = D_{q_1/q_2} \circ E_{q_2}^{\mathrm{in}}$, so $E_{q_2}^{\mathrm{in}}$ is above $E_{q_1}^{\mathrm{in}}$. Theorem 1 extends these relations componentwise to arbitrary multipartite homogeneous channels built by tensoring local exterior or interior channels over the affected modes. As a corollary, for any state functional non-increasing under the relevant intermediate maps, the exterior-sector value is non-increasing in $q$ and the interior-sector value is non-decreasing in $q$, for arbitrary input states and any choice of affected subsystems. The paper shows that entanglement monotones under deterministic local CPTP maps, occupation-basis coherence monotones under strictly incoherent operations, optimized Bell-functional values, and contractive-divergence correlation functionals all satisfy the required monotonicity, and demonstrates the predicted homogeneous-sector trends numerically for QJSD collective coherence in the GHS spacetime. Mixed exterior–interior sectors are not covered, and the numerical example shows input-dependent behavior there.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the effective single-mode, two-level fermionic approximation with ordinary partial traces over mode qubits and on the assumption that affected modes transform locally and independently so that the multipartite horizon channel factorizes as a tensor product; the paper itself notes that this reduction is not valid for arbitrary field states and that spin-resolved or bosonic settings require larger or infinite occupation spaces.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In any homogeneous exterior sector, every entanglement monotone, occupation-basis coherence monotone, optimized Bell-functional value, and contractive-divergence correlation functional is non-increasing as the horizon parameter $q$ increases.
  • In any homogeneous interior sector, the same quantities are non-decreasing as $q$ increases, regardless of the input state or the number of affected modes.
  • The recurring monotonic trends reported in earlier state- and measure-specific calculations are explained as direct consequences of the channel ordering, not as accidents of the chosen states.
  • Mixed exterior–interior configurations are left unconstrained: no universal monotonic direction exists, and the paper's GHS example shows input-dependent, sometimes nonmonotonic, behavior there.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The channel-ordering mechanism suggests a way to predict new horizon-resource trends: pick any state functional known to be monotone under strictly incoherent or deterministic local CPTP operations, and its homogeneous-sector direction is fixed before any state-specific computation.
  • If the same effective two-level reduction applies to other horizon geometries, the opposite ordering may persist, but the paper leaves bosonic channel ordering open for future analysis.
  • The mixed-sector input dependence indicates that the boundary between ordered and unordered resource behavior could be characterized by which intermediate maps can be combined into a single product post-processing channel.
  • The framework recasts case-by-case relativistic quantum-information results as structural consequences, which may guide the search for horizon signatures through monotone quantum resources.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a structural explanation for recurring monotonic trends of quantum resources near horizons. Starting from the effective single-mode, two-level fermionic mode transformation (Eq. (1)), the authors define the exterior channel E_q^out and the interior channel E_q^in by partial-tracing over the complementary output (Eqs. (4)-(5)). They prove that for 0<q_1<q_2<1/2 the exterior family satisfies E_q2^out = E_p^out ∘ E_q1^out with p=(q2-q1)/(1-q1), whereas the interior family satisfies E_q1^in = D_{q1/q2} ∘ E_q2^in (Eqs. (8) and (11)); hence the two families are ordered in opposite directions in the post-processing preorder. Theorem 1 extends this componentwise to multipartite homogeneous sectors, and Corollary 2 turns the ordering into functional inequalities for any functional that is non-increasing under the intermediate maps. Sections 3.1-3.4 apply this to entanglement monotones, SIO-coherence monotones, optimized Bell-functionals, and contractive-divergence correlation functionals; Section 4 gives a QJSD collective-coherence example in GHS spacetime. The paper explicitly states the limits of the single-mode, mode-qubit model in Section 5.

Significance. The significance of the paper lies in explaining many previously state-, measure-, and spacetime-specific numerical observations by a single channel-level fact: the exterior and interior horizon channels have opposite post-processing orders. The central composition identities are simple and verified by direct substitution; the corollaries follow rigorously from standard monotonicity axioms and the data-processing inequality. The paper does not overclaim its external validity: Section 5 acknowledges the single-mode approximation, the neglect of spin resolution, the infinite-dimensional bosonic case, and the mode-qubit partial-trace convention. The mixed exterior-interior sector is explicitly excluded from the theorem. Within the declared model the derivation is sound, and the numerical GHS example correctly exhibits the predicted homogeneous monotonicities while showing input-dependent behavior in the mixed sector. The contribution is primarily explanatory and unifying, which is appropriate for the journal.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (5)] The off-diagonal entries in Eq. (5) are placed in the opposite order from Eq. (4) (b* above the diagonal and b below), which is correct because the matrices are Hermitian, but the inconsistency may momentarily confuse a reader comparing the two expressions; a one-sentence note would remove the ambiguity.
  2. [Sec. 2.3, Theorem 1] The proof of Theorem 1 is compressed to a single sentence; stating explicitly that p_i=(q'_i-q_i)/(1-q_i) and eta_i=q_i/q'_i lie in [0,1] and that the identity factors on unaffected subsystems commute through the ordering would make the theorem easier to verify for a reader who does not carry out the substitution.
  3. [Sec. 3.4, Eq. (28)] The symbol pi_rho in Eq. (28) is defined only within the displayed equation; a prose definition immediately before the equation would improve readability, especially because the subscript rho could be confused with the state argument of C_coll.
  4. [Sec. 4 and Fig. 2] The numerical illustration would be more reproducible if the text stated explicitly that the curves are obtained by exact evaluation of the 8x8 density matrices for the noisy GHZ and W families, and if the limiting endpoint D->M^- were marked on the horizontal axis; this is a presentation detail and does not affect the theoretical claims.
  5. [Sec. 5, first paragraph] In the sentence 'the same argument applies uniformly across different input states, admissible resource and correlation functionals', a second comma before 'and' would clarify that the argument applies across input states and across admissible resource and correlation functionals.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the channel-ordering theorem is a self-contained derivation from the externally stated mode transformation, and the resource applications are consequences of standard monotonicity assumptions.

full rationale

The central claim is the pair of post-processing identities in Eqs. (8) and (11), which are verified by direct substitution from the explicit matrix forms of the channels in Eqs. (4), (5), and (9). These identities are not assumed, fitted, or imported from prior work; they follow algebraically from the stated effective single-mode transformation of Eq. (1). The multipartite extension in Theorem 1 is obtained by tensoring these verified local identities, and Corollary 2 is a direct consequence of the definition of the post-processing preorder together with the assumed monotonicity of R under the intermediate CPTP maps. The resource-theoretic applications in Sec. 3 use standard definitions (entanglement monotones under local CPTP maps, SIO coherence monotones, Bell-functional values via unital CP pullbacks, and DPI-based correlation functionals) rather than fitting parameters to the target monotonic directions. The GHS numerical example is an illustration of the derived direction, not evidence used to infer the ordering. The paper's citations to previous works, including references co-authored by the present authors, are used as contextual examples of reported trends, not as load-bearing justification for the theorem. The limitations stated in Sec. 5 concern the external validity of the underlying single-mode, mode-qubit model and do not affect the internal correctness of the channel-ordering derivation. No step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own input, and no self-citation is invoked to forbid alternative explanations or to supply the central result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The theoretical result rests on the borrowed single-mode transformation and the product/trace treatment of fermionic modes, plus standard resource-theoretic axioms; there are no fitted free parameters in the derivation, and no new entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The effective single-mode, two-level fermionic transformation (Eq. (1)) maps the vacuum to sqrt(1-q)|00> + sqrt(q)|11> and the one-particle state to |10>, with 0 <= q <= 1.
    Central input borrowed from Refs. [10,27,28,32]; the channel ordering is proved for this specific map, so the theorem's reach is limited to systems where this reduction holds.
  • domain assumption Multiple affected modes transform independently, so the multipartite horizon channel is the tensor product of single-mode channels (Sec. 2.3).
    Widely used in relativistic QI calculations; if the field modes couple or fermionic antisymmetry prevents a simple tensor-product reduction, Theorem 1's product intermediate maps fail.
  • domain assumption The physical parameter q is restricted to 0 < q < 1/2 and is monotonically related to the relevant spacetime or acceleration parameter (Sec. 2.1).
    The ordering theorem needs q1 <= q2 in this range; the application to trends in D, T_H, or a uses the monotone parameterizations q = [1 + e^x]^-1.
  • standard math Standard resource-theoretic properties: entanglement monotones are non-increasing under deterministic local CPTP maps, coherence monotones under SIO, Bell values under local POVM pullback, and state divergences obey the data-processing inequality (Secs. 3.1-3.4).
    These are established results from the resource-theory and quantum-information literature that the corollaries import.
  • domain assumption Ordinary tensor products and partial traces are used for fermionic modes, despite fermionic subsystem structure requiring parity superselection and mode embedding (Sec. 5).
    The authors explicitly note this is not a fully algebraic fermionic treatment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Opposite post-processing orders of fermionic horizon channels and their quantum-resource monotonicity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OKA57UAW

@misc{pith2026260808215,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Opposite post-processing orders of fermionic horizon channels and their quantum-resource monotonicity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OKA57UAW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08215}
}
abstract

Relativistic quantum-information studies in noninertial and black-hole settings often determine resource behavior through explicit calculations for particular input states and state functionals, leaving unclear whether the recurring monotonic trends originate from those choices or from a common underlying structure. In this work, we formulate the effective single-mode fermionic horizon transformation as a pair of complementary exterior and interior quantum channels, corresponding respectively to the physically accessible and inaccessible sectors, and establish exact post-processing orders in opposite directions. As the relativistic channel parameter $q$ increases, the exterior channel becomes progressively degraded, whereas the interior channel is ordered in the reverse direction. These relations extend to arbitrary multipartite settings. Consequently, every state functional that is non-increasing under the corresponding intermediate maps is non-increasing in homogeneous exterior sectors and non-decreasing in homogeneous interior sectors. The framework therefore applies to broad classes of quantum resources and correlations, including entanglement and occupation-basis coherence monotones, optimized Bell-functional quantities, and contractive-divergence correlation measures. We further numerically evaluate collective coherence based on the quantum Jensen-Shannon divergence (QJSD) in the Garfinkle-Horowitz-Strominger (GHS) dilaton-black-hole spacetime, illustrating the predicted homogeneous monotonicity. The recurring trends are therefore traced to a common channel-ordering structure, while the physical setting determines the parameterization of $q$ and the resource-theoretic monotonicity determines which output-state quantities inherit the order.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Peres, D.R

    A. Peres, D.R. Terno: Quantum information and relativity theory. Rev. Mod. Phys.76(1), 93–123 (2004) https:// doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.93

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.76.93 2004

  2. [2]

    Fulling: Nonuniqueness of canonical field quanti- zation in Riemannian space-time

    S.A. Fulling: Nonuniqueness of canonical field quanti- zation in Riemannian space-time. Phys. Rev. D7(10), 2850–2862 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.7. 2850

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.7 1973

  3. [3]

    Hawking: Particle creation by black holes

    S.W. Hawking: Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys.43(3), 199–220 (1975) https://doi.org/10. 1007/BF02345020

    1975

  4. [4]

    Davies: Scalar production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics

    P.C.W. Davies: Scalar production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.8(4), 609–616 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/8/4/022

    doi:10.1088/0305-4470/8/4/022 1975

  5. [5]

    Unruh: Notes on black-hole evaporation

    W.G. Unruh: Notes on black-hole evaporation. Phys. Rev. D14(4), 870–892 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.14.870

    1976

  6. [6]

    Peres, P.F

    A. Peres, P.F. Scudo, D.R. Terno: Quantum entropy and special relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett.88(23), 230402 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.230402

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.230402 2002

  7. [7]

    Gingrich, C

    R.M. Gingrich, C. Adami: Quantum entanglement of mov- ing bodies. Phys. Rev. Lett.89(27), 270402 (2002) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.270402

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.270402 2002

  8. [8]

    Alsing, G.J

    P.M. Alsing, G.J. Milburn: Teleportation with a uniformly accelerated partner. Phys. Rev. Lett.91(18), 180404 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.180404

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.180404 2003

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Fuentes-Schuller, R.B

    I. Fuentes-Schuller, R.B. Mann: Alice falls into a black hole: entanglement in noninertial frames. Phys. Rev. Lett.95(12), 120404 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.95.120404

    2005

  2. [10]

    Alsing, I

    P.M. Alsing, I. Fuentes-Schuller, R.B. Mann, T.E. Tessier: Entanglement of Dirac fields in noninertial frames. Phys. Rev. A74(3), 032326 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.74.032326

    2006

  3. [11]

    Alsing, I

    P.M. Alsing, I. Fuentes: Observer-dependent entangle- ment. Class. Quantum Grav.29(22), 224001 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/29/22/224001

    2012 doi

  4. [12]

    Hu, S.-Y

    B.L. Hu, S.-Y. Lin, J. Louko: Relativistic quantum infor- mation in detectors–field interactions. Class. Quantum Grav.29(22), 224005 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/29/22/224005

    2012

  5. [13]

    Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, N.C

    E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, N.C. Menicucci: Entanglement in curved spacetimes and cosmology. Class. Quantum Grav.31(21), 214001 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0264-9381/31/21/214001

    2014

  6. [14]

    Adesso, I

    G. Adesso, I. Fuentes-Schuller, M. Ericsson: Continuous- variable entanglement sharing in noninertial frames. Phys. Rev. A76(6), 062112 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.76.062112

    2007

  7. [15]

    Q. Pan, J. Jing: Hawking radiation, entanglement, and teleportation in the background of an asymptotically flat static black hole. Phys. Rev. D78(6), 065015 (2008) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.065015

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    Zhang, J.-M

    Z.-Y. Zhang, J.-M. Liu, Z. Hu, Y. Wang: Entropic uncer- tainty relation for Dirac particles in Garfinkle–Horowitz– Strominger dilation space–time. Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 530(11), 1800208 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp. 201800208

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Lian, J.-M

    Y.-J. Lian, J.-M. Liu: Quantum Fisher informa- tion of a qubit-qutrit system in Garfinkle–Horowitz– Strominger dilation space–time. Commun. Theor. Phys. 73(8), 085102 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/1572-9494/ ac01e4

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    H. Yao, L. Zhang, C. Wen, J. Wang: Hierarchical rela- tionship of nonlocal correlations in Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime. Eur. Phys. J. C85(1), 59 (2025) https://doi. org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13765-2

    2025 doi

  11. [20]

    L.-J. Li, F. Ming, X.-K. Song, L. Ye, D. Wang: Quantum- ness and entropic uncertainty in curved space-time. Eur. Phys. J. C82(8), 726 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-022-10687-1

    2022

  12. [21]

    Zhang, X

    T. Zhang, X. Wang, S.-M. Fei: Hawking effect can gener- ate physically inaccessible genuine tripartite nonlocality. Eur. Phys. J. C83(7), 607 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjc/s10052-023-11796-1

    2023

  13. [22]

    Liu, Z.-w

    C.-y. Liu, Z.-w. Long, Q.-l. He: Quantum coherence and quantum Fisher information of Dirac particles in curved spacetime under decoherence. Phys. Lett. B857, 138991 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138991

    2024

  14. [23]

    Li, S.-M

    W.-M. Li, S.-M. Wu: Bosonic and fermionic coherence of N-partite states in the background of a dilaton black hole. J. High Energy Phys.2024(9), 144 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1007/JHEP09(2024)144 arXiv:2407.07688 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [25]

    Nasr Esfahani, M

    B. Nasr Esfahani, M. Shamirzaie, M. Soltani: Reduction of entanglement degradation in Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet grav- ity. Phys. Rev. D84(2), 025024 (2011) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.025024

    2011 doi

  16. [26]

    X.-H. Ge, S.P. Kim: Quantum entanglement and telepor- tation in higher dimensional black hole spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav.25(7), 075011 (2008) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0264-9381/25/7/075011

    2008

  17. [27]

    J. Wang, Q. Pan, J. Jing: Entanglement redistribution in the Schwarzschild spacetime. Phys. Lett. B692(3), 202–205 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2010. 07.035

    2010 doi

  18. [28]

    J. Wang, J. Jing, H. Fan: Quantum discord and measurement-induced disturbance in the background of dilaton black holes. Phys. Rev. D90(2), 025032 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.025032

    2014 doi

  19. [29]

    Liu, S.-M

    Q. Liu, S.-M. Wu, C. Wen, J. Wang: Quantum properties of fermionic fields in multi-event horizon spacetime. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.66(12), 120413 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2246-8

    2023 doi

  20. [30]

    W.-M. Li, J. Lu, S.-M. Wu: Entropic uncertainty and coherence in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C86(1), 59 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-026-15285-z

    2026 doi

  21. [31]

    J. Wang, J. Deng, J. Jing: Classical correlation and quan- tum discord sharing of Dirac fields in noninertial frames. Phys. Rev. A81(5), 052120 (2010) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.81.052120

    2010

  22. [32]

    J. Wang, Q. Pan, S. Chen, J. Jing: Quantum entangle- ment of Dirac field in background of an asymptotically flat static black hole. Quantum Inf. Comput.10(11–12), 947–955 (2010) https://doi.org/10.26421/QIC10.11-12-5

    2010 doi

  23. [33]

    Xu, X.-k

    S. Xu, X.-k. Song, J.-d. Shi, L. Ye: Probing the quantum correlation and Bell non-locality for Dirac particles with Hawking effect in the background of Schwarzschild black 9 hole. Phys. Lett. B733, 1–5 (2014) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physletb.2014.04.008

    2014

  24. [34]

    J. He, S. Xu, Y. Yu, L. Ye: Property of various correla- tion measures of open Dirac system with Hawking effect in Schwarzschild space–time. Phys. Lett. B740, 322–328 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2014.12.008

    2015 doi

  25. [35]

    X. Liu, W. Liu, S.-M. Wu: Reversing quantum resource hierarchy: non-maximal multipartite entanglement in dilaton spacetime. Eur. Phys. J. C85(10), 1209 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14961-w

    2025 doi

  26. [36]

    Wu, S.-H

    S.-M. Wu, S.-H. Li: Do maximally entangled states always have an advantage over non-maximally entangled states in Schwarzschild black hole? Eur. Phys. J. C85(6), 614 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14347-y

    2025 doi

  27. [37]

    J.-M. Li, L. Tong, X.-L. Huang: Enhanced robustness of non-maximal multipartite entanglement under Hawking radiation. Eur. Phys. J. C86(2), 177 (2026) https://doi. org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15391-y

    2026 doi

  28. [38]

    W.-M. Li, J. Lu, S.-M. Wu: Multiqubit coherence of mixed states near event horizon. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2026(02), 058 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1475-7516/2026/02/058

    2026

  29. [39]

    Teng, R.-Y

    X.-W. Teng, R.-Y. Xu, H.-C. Yang, S.-M. Wu: Bosonic and fermionic mutual information of N-partite systems in dilaton black hole background. Nucl. Phys. B1029, 117559 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026. 117559

    2026 doi

  30. [40]

    Xu, X.-k

    S. Xu, X.-k. Song, J.-d. Shi, L. Ye: How the Hawking effect affects multipartite entanglement of Dirac particles in the background of a Schwarzschild black hole. Phys. Rev. D 89(6), 065022 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 89.065022

    2014 doi

  31. [41]

    Asghari, P

    M. Asghari, P. Pedram, P. Espoukeh: Entanglement degradation in the presence of the Kerr–Newman black hole. Quantum Inf. Process.17(5), 115 (2018) https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11128-018-1873-2

    2018 doi

  32. [42]

    Haddadi, M.A

    S. Haddadi, M.A. Yurischev, M.Y. Abd-Rabbou, M. Azizi, M.R. Pourkarimi, M. Ghominejad: Quantumness near a Schwarzschild black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C84(1), 42 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-12393-6

    2024 doi

  33. [43]

    G.-W. Mi, X. Huang, S.-M. Fei, T. Zhang: Genuine four- partite Bell nonlocality in the curved spacetime. Eur. Phys. J. C85(3), 354 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-025-14076-2 arXiv:2503.23302 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [44]

    Majtey, P.W

    A.P. Majtey, P.W. Lamberti, D.P. Prato: Jensen-Shannon divergence as a measure of distinguishability between mixed quantum states. Phys. Rev. A72(5), 052310 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.052310

    2005 doi

  35. [45]

    Radhakrishnan, M

    C. Radhakrishnan, M. Parthasarathy, S. Jambulingam, T. Byrnes: Distribution of quantum coherence in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.116(15), 150504 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.150504

    2016 doi

  36. [46]

    Radhakrishnan, Z

    C. Radhakrishnan, Z. Ding, F. Shi, J. Du, T. Byrnes: Basis-independent quantum coherence and its distribu- tion. Ann. Phys.409, 167906 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.aop.2019.04.020

    2019

  37. [47]

    Garfinkle, G.T

    D. Garfinkle, G.T. Horowitz, A. Strominger: Charged black holes in string theory. Phys. Rev. D43(10), 3140– 3143 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.43.3140

    1991 doi

  38. [48]

    Bhattacharya, S

    S. Bhattacharya, S. Chakrabortty, S. Goyal: Dirac fermion, cosmological event horizons, and quantum entan- glement. Phys. Rev. D101(8), 085016 (2020) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.085016

    2020 doi

  39. [49]

    Omkar, R

    S. Omkar, R. Srikanth, S. Banerjee, A.K. Alok: The Unruh effect interpreted as a quantum noise channel. Quantum Inf. Comput.16(9–10), 757–770 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.26421/QIC16.9-10-2

    2016 doi

  40. [50]

    Nielsen, I.L

    M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th anniversary edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). https://doi.org/10. 1017/CBO9780511976667

    2010

  41. [51]

    Buscemi: Degradable channels, less noisy channels, and quantum statistical morphisms: an equivalence rela- tion

    F. Buscemi: Degradable channels, less noisy channels, and quantum statistical morphisms: an equivalence rela- tion. Probl. Inf. Transm.52(3), 201–213 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1134/S0032946016030017

    2016 doi

  42. [52]

    Jenˇ cov´ a: A general theory of comparison of quan- tum channels (and beyond)

    A. Jenˇ cov´ a: A general theory of comparison of quan- tum channels (and beyond). IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 67(6), 3945–3964 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT. 2021.3070120

    2021

  43. [53]

    Vidal: Entanglement monotones

    G. Vidal: Entanglement monotones. J. Mod. Opt. 47(2-3), 355–376 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500340008244048

    2000

  44. [54]

    Horodecki, P

    R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, K. Horodecki: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys.81(2), 865–942 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

    2009 doi

  45. [55]

    Vidal, R.F

    G. Vidal, R.F. Werner: Computable measure of entangle- ment. Phys. Rev. A65(3), 032314 (2002) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314

    2002 doi

  46. [56]

    Plenio: Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex

    M.B. Plenio: Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex. Phys. Rev. Lett.95(9), 090503 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95. 090503

    2005 doi

  47. [57]

    Vedral, M.B

    V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio, M.A. Rippin, P.L. Knight: Quan- tifying entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett.78(12), 2275–2279 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2275

    1997 doi

  48. [58]

    Vedral, M.B

    V. Vedral, M.B. Plenio: Entanglement measures and purification procedures. Phys. Rev. A57(3), 1619–1633 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.57.1619

    1998 doi

  49. [59]

    Bennett, D.P

    C.H. Bennett, D.P. DiVincenzo, J.A. Smolin, W.K. Woot- ters: Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error cor- rection. Phys. Rev. A54(5), 3824–3851 (1996) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824

    1996 doi

  50. [60]

    Squashed entanglement

    M. Christandl, A. Winter: “Squashed entanglement”: an additive entanglement measure. J. Math. Phys.45(3), 829–840 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1643788

    2004 doi

  51. [61]

    Hill, W.K

    S.A. Hill, W.K. Wootters: Entanglement of a pair of quantum bits. Phys. Rev. Lett.78(26), 5022–5025 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.5022

    1997 doi

  52. [62]

    Wootters: Entanglement of formation of an arbi- trary state of two qubits

    W.K. Wootters: Entanglement of formation of an arbi- trary state of two qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett.80(10), 2245–2248 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 80.2245

    1998 doi

  53. [64]

    Jungnitsch, T

    B. Jungnitsch, T. Moroder, O. G¨ uhne: Taming multiparti- cle entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett.106(19), 190502 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.190502

    2011 doi

  54. [65]

    Hofmann, T

    M. Hofmann, T. Moroder, O. G¨ uhne: Analytical charac- terization of the genuine multiparticle negativity. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47(15), 155301 (2014) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1751-8113/47/15/155301

    2014 doi

  55. [66]

    Sen(De), U

    A. Sen(De), U. Sen: Channel capacities versus entan- glement measures in multiparty quantum states. Phys. Rev. A81(1), 012308 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.81.012308

    2010

  56. [67]

    T. Das, S. Singha Roy, S. Bagchi, A. Misra, A. Sen(De), U. Sen: Generalized geometric measure of entanglement for multiparty mixed states. Phys. Rev. A94(2), 022336 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.022336

    2016 doi

  57. [68]

    Qiang, G.-H

    W.-C. Qiang, G.-H. Sun, Q. Dong, S.-H. Dong: Genuine multipartite concurrence for entanglement of Dirac fields in noninertial frames. Phys. Rev. A98(2), 022320 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022320 10

    2018 doi

  58. [69]

    Z. Yang, H. Cheng, S.-H. Li: Advantages and disadvan- tages of maximally entangled states in dilaton black hole background. Phys. Lett. B875, 140368 (2026) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140368

    2026

  59. [70]

    Baumgratz, M

    T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, M.B. Plenio: Quantifying coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett.113(14), 140401 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140401

    2014 doi

  60. [71]

    Streltsov, G

    A. Streltsov, G. Adesso, M.B. Plenio: Colloquium: quan- tum coherence as a resource. Rev. Mod. Phys.89(4), 041003 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89. 041003

    2017 doi

  61. [72]

    Winter, D

    A. Winter, D. Yang: Operational resource theory of coher- ence. Phys. Rev. Lett.116(12), 120404 (2016) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.120404

    2016 doi

  62. [73]

    Yadin, J

    B. Yadin, J. Ma, D. Girolami, M. Gu, V. Vedral: Quan- tum processes which do not use coherence. Phys. Rev. X 6(4), 041028 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX. 6.041028

    2016 doi

  63. [74]

    Napoli, T.R

    C. Napoli, T.R. Bromley, M. Cianciaruso, M. Piani, N. Johnston, G. Adesso: Robustness of coherence: an oper- ational and observable measure of quantum coherence. Phys. Rev. Lett.116(15), 150502 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.150502

    2016 doi

  64. [75]

    T. Liao, J. Yang, T. Zhang, X. Huang: Quantum coher- ence of mixed states under noisy channels in noninertial frames. Results Phys.70, 108169 (2025) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rinp.2025.108169

    2025

  65. [76]

    Brunner, D

    N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, S. Wehner: Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys.86(2), 419–478 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419

    2014 doi

  66. [77]

    Clauser, M.A

    J.F. Clauser, M.A. Horne, A. Shimony, R.A. Holt: Pro- posed experiment to test local hidden-variable theories. Phys. Rev. Lett.23(15), 880–884 (1969) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880

    1969 doi

  67. [78]

    Collins, N

    D. Collins, N. Gisin, N. Linden, S. Massar, S. Popescu: Bell inequalities for arbitrarily high-dimensional systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.88(4), 040404 (2002) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.88.040404

    2002

  68. [79]

    Mermin: Extreme quantum entanglement in a super- position of macroscopically distinct states

    N.D. Mermin: Extreme quantum entanglement in a super- position of macroscopically distinct states. Phys. Rev. Lett.65(15), 1838–1840 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.65.1838

    1990

  69. [80]

    Svetlichny: Distinguishing three-body from two-body nonseparability by a Bell-type inequality

    G. Svetlichny: Distinguishing three-body from two-body nonseparability by a Bell-type inequality. Phys. Rev. D35(10), 3066–3069 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.35.3066

    1987

  70. [81]

    Cleve, P

    R. Cleve, P. Høyer, B. Toner, J. Watrous: Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies. In: Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Com- plexity, pp. 236–249. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alami- tos, CA, USA (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.2004. 1313847

    2004 doi

  71. [82]

    Umegaki: Conditional expectation in an operator alge- bra

    H. Umegaki: Conditional expectation in an operator alge- bra. IV. entropy and information. Kodai Math. Sem. Rep.14(2), 59–85 (1962) https://doi.org/10.2996/kmj/ 1138844604

    1962 doi

  72. [83]

    Lindblad: Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities

    G. Lindblad: Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities. Commun. Math. Phys.40(2), 147–151 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609396

    1975 doi

  73. [84]

    Uhlmann: Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase- Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory

    A. Uhlmann: Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase- Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory. Com- mun. Math. Phys.54(1), 21–32 (1977) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01609834

    1977 doi

  74. [85]

    Groisman, S

    B. Groisman, S. Popescu, A. Winter: Quantum, classi- cal, and total amount of correlations in a quantum state. Phys. Rev. A72(3), 032317 (2005) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.72.032317

    2005

  75. [86]

    Z. Liu, P. Zeng, Y. Zhou, M. Gu: Characterizing cor- relation within multipartite quantum systems via local randomized measurements. Phys. Rev. A105(2), 022407 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.022407

    2022 doi

  76. [87]

    A. Ali, S. Al-Kuwari, M. Ghominejad, M.T. Rahim, D. Wang, S. Haddadi: Quantum characteristics near event horizons. Phys. Rev. D110(6), 064001 (2024) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.064001

    2024 doi

  77. [88]

    Gilchrist, N.K

    A. Gilchrist, N.K. Langford, M.A. Nielsen: Distance mea- sures to compare real and ideal quantum processes. Phys. Rev. A71(6), 062310 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevA.71.062310

    2005

  78. [89]

    Leditzky, C

    F. Leditzky, C. Rouz´ e, N. Datta: Data processing for the sandwiched R´ enyi divergence: a condition for equality. Lett. Math. Phys.107(1), 61–80 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11005-016-0896-9

    2017 doi

  79. [90]

    Bruschi, J

    D.E. Bruschi, J. Louko, E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez, A. Dragan, I. Fuentes: Unruh effect in quantum information beyond the single-mode approximation. Phys. Rev. A82(4), 042332 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.042332

    2010 doi

  80. [91]

    Le´ on, E

    J. Le´ on, E. Mart ´ ın-Mart ´ ınez: Spin and occupation num- ber entanglement of Dirac fields for noninertial observers. Phys. Rev. A80(1), 012314 (2009) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.80.012314

    2009

  81. [93]

    Friis, A.R

    N. Friis, A.R. Lee, D.E. Bruschi: Fermionic-mode entanglement in quantum information. Phys. Rev. A 87(2), 022338 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 87.022338

    2013 doi

  82. [94]

    Szalay, Z

    S. Szalay, Z. Zimbor´ as, M. M´ at´ e, G. Barcza, C. Schilling, ¨O. Legeza: Fermionic systems for quantum information people. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.54(39), 393001 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac0646

    2021 doi

  83. [95]

    Harikrishnan, T

    S. Harikrishnan, T. Byrnes, C. Radhakrishnan: Influence of noninertial dynamics on static quantum resource the- ories (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.04199 arXiv:2602.04199 [quant-ph] 11

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.