EFT Corrections to Photon Propagation and Gravitational Lensing in an Ellis-Bronnikov Wormhole

Takamasa Kanai

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 57 references

EFT Corrections to Photon Propagation and Gravitational Lensing in an Ellis-Bronnikov Wormhole

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that an EFT Ricci-photon coupling, which vanishes in Schwarzschild spacetime, imprints a distinctive logarithmic divergence in strong-deflection lensing by an Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole.

desk verdict A genuinely new Ricci-photon lensing signature in a wormhole, held back by an unresolved background-consistency issue and typos in the key coefficients. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08526 v1 pith:B77TUQBX submitted 2026-08-09 gr-qc hep-th

Takamasa Kanai This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-th

keywords effectivefieldtheoryphotonpropagationEllis-Bronnikovwormholegravitationallensingstrongdeflectionlimitpolarizationbirefringencespheretimedelay

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Strong gravitational lensing near a wormhole's photon sphere can be more than a probe of the background geometry; it can also carry the imprint of effective-field-theory corrections to how photons themselves move. This paper studies the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole, a non-vacuum spacetime whose Ricci tensor is nonzero, and derives polarization-dependent photon trajectories from curvature-photon couplings in the action. In the strong-deflection limit the logarithmic divergence of the deflection angle acquires corrections proportional to the EFT couplings, and the term $R_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\rho}F^{\nu}{}_{\rho}$ contributes because the wormhole is not Ricci-flat. The upshot is that even parametrically small EFT corrections may be amplified near the photon sphere and could distinguish a wormhole from a black hole.

What carries the argument

The central object is the polarization-dependent effective optical metric (Eqs. 24 and 74) obtained from the eikonal light-cone conditions for the PPL and PPM modes. It carries the argument because photon trajectories are taken as null geodesics of this effective metric rather than the background one, so the photon-sphere radius and the strong-deflection coefficients are read off from its metric functions. The load-bearing interaction is the Ricci-photon coupling $\beta R_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\rho}F^{\nu}{}_{\rho}$, which is nonvanishing in the wormhole because $R_{\mu\nu}\neq 0$; the expansion machinery is the strong-deflection-limit decomposition of the deflection angle into a logarithmic term with coefficient $\bar{a}$ and a regular part $\bar{b}$, with $\bar{a}$ receiving the $\beta$ and $\gamma$ corrections.

What would settle it

Compute the first-order corrected metric coming from the operators eliminated by the field redefinition (the $R^2$, scalar-metric, and derivative terms) and recompute the photon-sphere radius; if the resulting shift of $r_{\mathrm{ph}}$ is comparable to $-12s\gamma\,M e^{-M(\pi-2\arctan 2M)}/(1+4M^2)$, the claimed wormhole-specific lensing signature is not cleanly attributable to the Ricci-photon coupling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the two physical photon polarizations, the in-plane PPL mode and the out-of-plane PPM mode, obey different effective optical metrics in the EFT-corrected Ellis-Bronnikov spacetime, and the strong-deflection coefficients $\bar{a}$ and $\bar{b}$ in Eq. (87) are modified by both the $\beta R_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\rho}F^{\nu}{}_{\rho}$ interaction and the $\gamma$ Weyl coupling. The photon-sphere radius itself shifts by a $\gamma$-dependent term (Eq. 78), and the Ricci-photon $\beta$ term, absent in Schwarzschild because $R_{\mu\nu}=0$, enters the logarithmically divergent part of the deflection angle. Thus the strong-deflection limit is claimed to be a sensitive place to look for curvature-photon interactions, and a possible observational route to telling the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole apart from a Schwarzschild black hole.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the Ellis-Bronnikov metric stays exactly the background once the EFT operators are switched on, even though some operators are removed by redefining the metric; if those removed operators shift the photon-sphere radius as much as the $\beta$ and $\gamma$ couplings do, the signature would be contaminated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

PPL and PPM photons follow distinct effective metrics, so the same source produces polarization-dependent Einstein rings and image positions.
The photon-sphere radius (Eq. 78) and the critical impact parameter shift with the $\gamma$ coupling, moving the angular position of the relativistic images.
The logarithmic coefficient $\bar{a}$ (Eq. 83) acquires $\beta$- and $\gamma$-dependent pieces, so the divergence of the deflection angle is no longer universal.
The time delay between relativistic images (Eq. 100) also feels the EFT corrections, but it lacks the log-divergent enhancement and is a weaker discriminator.
Because the $\beta$ contribution vanishes for Schwarzschild and survives for the wormhole, a measurement of the strong-deflection coefficient carries information about whether the lens is Ricci-flat.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the polarization dependence can be resolved, combining PPL and PPM image positions could isolate the Ricci-photon coupling from the Weyl coupling, since the two enter with opposite signs for the two modes.
The same effective-metric technique transfers to rotating wormholes or other non-Ricci-flat compact objects, where frame dragging could produce additional polarization-dependent image splitting.
A null result in polarization-resolved strong lensing would translate into an upper bound on $|\beta|$ and $|\gamma|$ in units of the throat scale $\ell^2$, turning the proposed signature into a constraint on the EFT parameter space.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick read: the new thing here is real. Kanai applies the photon-curvature coupling program (Drummond-Hathrell, Chen-Jing, etc.) to an Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole and finds that the R_{μν} F^{μρ}F^ν_ρ coupling, which vanishes in vacuum, contributes to the strong-deflection coefficients. That is a legitimate observable distinction from Schwarzschild in principle, and the uncoupled Ellis limit checks out. The Bozza machinery is standard and the polarization split looks sensible. Citation pattern is clean; the earlier Weyl-photon lensing work and EB lensing work are properly acknowledged.

Main soft spot: the background-metric question. The paper starts from action (1) and uses a field redefinition to eliminate seven operators, then keeps the exact EB metric. But the eliminated R², Ricci², scalar-curvature terms don't vanish on the EB background; they shift the metric at first order in EFT couplings. That shift changes the photon sphere and the Bozza A, B, C functions at the same order as the retained β and γ corrections. Unless the paper declares (5) to be the exact action with all other couplings set to zero, the β signature is not isolated. The text hints at this ('we do not consider terms...') but that is not enough; the logic needs to be stated as a choice, not a field-redefinition truncation.

Second: Eqs. (47) and (48) have typos in central results. Eq. (47) writes β−4γ where the context and Eq. (48) require β−4sγ, and the b̄ in Eq. (48) drops the zeroth-order 3 log 2 term that appears in Eq. (47). These errors make a reader stop trusting the final expressions.

Third: the M≠0 expressions, Eqs. (79)–(87), are very opaque, and the only numerical check is Table I with no code or method described. A clean M→0 limit or a numerical cross-check for a few M values would help.

The 'enhancement' claim in Sec. VI is also a bit too strong: a small β shifts the coefficient of the log divergence, but it does not get amplified relative to the leading term; the log makes the correction grow in absolute terms, not in ratio. That framing should be tuned.

Bottom line: this deserves a serious referee. The Ricci-photon lensing signature is worth exploring, and the derivation is mostly sound. But the background-consistency issue has to be fixed or explicitly declared away, and the typos need correcting before publication. I'd send it out.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies strong-field gravitational lensing of photons in the Ellis-Bronnikov (EB) wormhole spacetime with effective-field-theory (EFT) corrections to photon propagation. Starting from an effective action containing curvature-photon couplings $\alpha R F^2$, $\beta R_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\rho}F^{\nu}{}_{\rho}$, and $\gamma C_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F^{\mu\nu}F^{\rho\sigma}$, it derives polarization-dependent light-cone conditions and effective optical metrics for the two physical polarization modes. The paper then applies the Bozza strong-deflection formalism to compute the photon-sphere radius, the strong-deflection coefficients $\bar a$ and $\bar b$, and the time delay between relativistic images. The central claim is that the Ricci-photon coupling, which is nonzero in the EB wormhole because the spacetime is not Ricci-flat but vanishes in Schwarzschild, contributes to the logarithmically divergent part of the deflection angle and may provide an observational handle for distinguishing wormholes from black holes.

Significance. If the central claim is established, the paper offers a concrete and interesting way in which EFT corrections can produce polarization-dependent strong-lensing signatures that are not universal but retain information about the curvature structure of the spacetime. The computation is self-contained and has a useful consistency check: the $\beta=\gamma=0$ limit with $M=0$ correctly reproduces the known Ellis wormhole deflection angle, and the Bozza strong-deflection machinery is standard. The identification of a Ricci-photon contribution that is specific to non-vacuum spacetimes is a plausible physical insight with potentially observable consequences. The main weakness is that the derivation does not yet isolate this effect from equal-order background metric corrections, as discussed in the first major comment.

major comments (2)

[Sec. II.A, Eqs. (3)-(5) and Eq. (24)] The central derivation computes photon propagation on the exact EB background metric (9), but the starting action (1) contains higher-curvature and scalar-curvature operators that do not vanish on this background. The field redefinition in Eqs. (3)-(4) removes those operators, but only at the price of a first-order metric shift $\delta g_{\mu\nu}$; the manuscript explicitly drops such terms, saying they "do not modify the photon propagation at the order of interest." That statement is not sufficient: any first-order metric correction modifies the null geodesics and therefore enters the Bozza functions $A,B,C$ in Eqs. (51)-(53), shifting $r_{\rm ph}$ in Eq. (78), $u_{\rm ph}$ in Eq. (85), and $\bar a$ in Eq. (83) at the same order as the retained $\beta$ and $\gamma$ effects. Unless Eq. (5) is declared to be the complete effective action, with the EB metric (9) being an exact solution of that action, or unless the $\delta g$ corrections are computed and shown to be subleading, the claimed isolation of the $\beta$-induced wormhole-versus-black-hole signature in Sec. VI is not established.
[Sec. III, Eqs. (47)-(48)] The explicit strong-deflection coefficients for the Ellis wormhole are internally inconsistent. Equation (47) contains $2(\beta-4\gamma)$ in the finite term, whereas the preceding equations (38)-(46) all involve $\beta-4s\gamma$. Equation (48) then gives $\bar b$ without the $3\log 2$ term that is present in Eq. (47). These formulas are the explicit basis for the subsequent claim that EFT corrections enter the logarithmically divergent part of the deflection angle, so they must be corrected and the derivation rechecked before the results of Sec. IV can be trusted.

minor comments (5)

[Sec. IV, Eqs. (22)-(24)] The polarization assignment in the effective metric (24) appears to be inverted. Dividing Eq. (22) by $(1+8\gamma A)$ gives an angular factor $(1+8\gamma B)/(1+8\gamma A)$, while Eq. (24) assigns $s=+1$ (PPL) to $(1+8\gamma A)/(1+8\gamma B)$; the latter is the factor obtained from Eq. (23). Please check the $s$ assignment, since the paper's statements about which polarization mode produces which sign of the correction depend on it.
[Sec. III, Eq. (35)] Equation (35) writes $b\to b_c=a$ but $a$ has not been defined at that point; it should be $b_c=\ell$.
[Sec. IV, title] The section title spells "ELLIS-BRONBIKOV"; it should be "ELLIS-BRONNIKOV".
[Eq. (4)] The index placement in the terms $a_3 F_{\nu\rho}F^{\nu\rho}g_{\mu\nu}$ and $a_4 F_{\mu\rho}F^{\nu}{}_{\rho}$ is typographically confused; the intended contractions should be written with raised indices for clarity.
[Reference [48]] Reference [48] is cited in the context of Ellis wormhole lensing, but its title, "There are no rotating stars of a perfect fluid in Horava-Lifshitz gravity," does not match that context; this appears to be a mis-citation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the EFT couplings are free parameters, the effective metric is derived from the action, and the strong-deflection coefficients are computed rather than fitted.

full rationale

The paper's central result—EFT corrections to the photon-sphere radius and strong-deflection coefficients in the Ellis–Bronnikov wormhole—is a direct consequence of solving the modified Maxwell equation (7) in the eikonal limit to obtain the light-cone conditions (22)–(23), constructing the effective optical metric (24), and then applying Bozza's strong-deflection formalism to that metric. No quantity is defined in terms of the result it is said to predict; beta and gamma enter as free couplings in the starting action (5) and are not fitted to any lensing data. The uncoupled limit reproduces the known Ellis wormhole strong-deflection coefficients (Eq. 36), providing an external consistency check. The polarization decomposition follows independent references [38–40] rather than a self-citation chain, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's earlier work. The one substantive concern—that the field redefinition from Eqs. (3)–(4) to the truncated action (5) may omit first-order metric corrections that would shift the background used in Eq. (24)—is a completeness or correctness risk, not a circularity: those omitted corrections are not assumed to equal the beta and gamma effects, and the claimed beta/gamma contribution is not established by definition. Accordingly, no circular step meets the evidentiary standard of quoting a specific equation that reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation introduces no new entities. It uses the free EFT parameters beta and gamma as expansion parameters and the wormhole parameters M and ell as background inputs. The main burden is the truncation of the EFT action and the neglect of first-order metric corrections from field redefinitions.

free parameters (4)

beta
EFT coupling of the R_{μν}F^{μρ}F^ν_ρ term in the effective action (5). It is a free parameter of the model, not determined by any principle or data in the paper; the paper keeps it symbolic and treats it as a small expansion parameter.
gamma
EFT coupling of the Weyl-photon term gamma C_{μνρσ}F^{μν}F^{ρσ} in Eq. (5). Free parameter, not fitted; its sign and magnitude are unconstrained by the paper.
M (mass parameter)
Integration constant of the Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole solution (Eqs. 8-10). It is a model parameter of the background spacetime, scanned over in Table I, not fitted to data.
ell (throat scale) = set to 1
Characteristic wormhole length scale. The paper sets ell=1 in Section IV and argues the scale can be restored by rescaling; it is a model input, not fitted.

assumptions (4)

ad hoc to paper The effective action (5) contains the complete set of relevant operators for photon propagation; all other operators in (1) can be removed by the field redefinition (3)-(4) without affecting the background metric at the order of interest.
The paper asserts the field redefinition can eliminate seven operators, but does not show that the eliminated scalar-photon and R^2 operators leave the EB metric unchanged at first order. This premise is load-bearing because first-order corrections to the background metric would change the lensing observables at the same order as the retained beta and gamma effects.
domain assumption The eikonal approximation applies to photons near the photon sphere of the wormhole, so the dispersion relation (7) and the effective optical metrics (24) describe photon trajectories.
Used in Section II.A to derive the photon equation of motion and light-cone conditions; standard for geometric optics but an approximation that could fail in the strong-curvature region.
domain assumption The Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole metric (9) with phantom scalar (8) is a valid background solution of the theory.
Taken from Refs. [35,36] as the unperturbed spacetime. For observational distinction one must further assume such wormholes exist, which the paper does not discuss.
domain assumption Bozza's strong-deflection expansion (Eqs. 50-73) is valid for the effective optical metrics.
The paper applies the standard strong-deflection limit formalism to the effective metrics without re-deriving it; this is an established method, but its applicability requires the photon sphere to be a non-degenerate extremum of C/A, which holds for the EB metric.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of EFT Corrections to Photon Propagation and Gravitational Lensing in an Ellis-Bronnikov Wormhole." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B77TUQBX

@misc{pith2026260808526,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: EFT Corrections to Photon Propagation and Gravitational Lensing in an Ellis-Bronnikov Wormhole},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B77TUQBX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08526}
}

abstract

We investigate strong gravitational lensing by an Ellis-Bronnikov (EB) wormhole in the presence of effective field theory (EFT) corrections to photon propagation. We derive the modified photon propagation law induced by non-minimal couplings between the electromagnetic field and spacetime curvature, which leads to polarization-dependent photon trajectories in the EB wormhole spacetime. Using the strong deflection limit, we derive the corrections to the photon sphere and the logarithmically divergent part of the deflection angle. Although the EFT corrections are parametrically small, their contributions can become appreciable near the photon sphere. In particular, the $R_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\rho}F^{\nu}{}_{\rho}$ interaction, which is nonvanishing for the EB wormhole but absent in the Schwarzschild spacetime, contributes to the strong-deflection coefficients. This may provide a distinctive lensing signature for observationally distinguishing wormholes from black holes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

[1]

Falcke, F

H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center, Astrophys. J. Lett.528, L13 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912263

arXiv 2000
[2]

Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Super- massive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

arXiv 2019
[3]

Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2022
[4]

Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class

S. Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2023
[5]

K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D62, 084003 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/9904193

arXiv 2000
[6]

Bozza, S

V. Bozza, S. Capozziello, G. Iovane, and G. Scarpetta, Strong field limit of black hole gravitational lensing, Gen. Rel. Grav.33, 1535 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0102068

arXiv 2001
[7]

Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys

V. Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0208075

arXiv 2002
[8]

G. W. Gibbons and M. C. Werner, Applications of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem to gravitational lensing, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 235009 (2008), arXiv:0807.0854 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2008

Show all 57 references

[9]

Bozza, Quasiequatorial gravitational lensing by spinning black holes in the strong field limit, Phys

V. Bozza, Quasiequatorial gravitational lensing by spinning black holes in the strong field limit, Phys. Rev. D67, 103006 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0210109

2003 arXiv
[10]

Bozza and L

V. Bozza and L. Mancini, Time delay in black hole gravitational lensing as a distance estimator, Gen. Rel. Grav.36, 435 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0305007

2004 arXiv
[11]

Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

S. Weinberg, Phenomenological Lagrangians, Physica A96, 327 (1979)

1979
[12]

J. F. Donoghue, Leading quantum correction to the Newtonian potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2996 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9310024

1994
[13]

J. F. Donoghue, General relativity as an effective field theory: The leading quantum corrections, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9405057

1994 arXiv
[14]

C. P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: General relativity as an effective field theory, Living Rev. Rel.7, 5 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0311082

2004 arXiv
[15]

Scharnhorst, On propagation of light in the vacuum between plates, Phys

K. Scharnhorst, On propagation of light in the vacuum between plates, Phys. Lett. B236, 354 (1990), [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 787, 204–204 (2018)]. 18

1990
[16]

Barton, Faster ThancLight Between Parallel Mirrors: The Scharnhorst Effect Rederived, Phys

G. Barton, Faster ThancLight Between Parallel Mirrors: The Scharnhorst Effect Rederived, Phys. Lett. B237, 559 (1990)

1990
[17]

Barton and K

G. Barton and K. Scharnhorst, QED between parallel mirrors: Light signals faster than c, or amplified by the vacuum, J. Phys. A26, 2037 (1993)

1993
[18]

J. I. Latorre, P. Pascual, and R. Tarrach, Speed of light in nontrivial vacua, Nucl. Phys. B437, 60 (1995), arXiv:hep- th/9408016

1995
[19]

Dittrich and H

W. Dittrich and H. Gies, Light propagation in nontrivial QED vacua, Phys. Rev. D58, 025004 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9804375

1998
[20]

V. A. De Lorenci, R. Klippert, M. Novello, and J. M. Salim, Light propagation in nonlinear electrodynamics, Phys. Lett. B482, 134 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0005049

2000 arXiv
[21]

I. T. Drummond and S. J. Hathrell, QED Vacuum Polarization in a Background Gravitational Field and Its Effect on the Velocity of Photons, Phys. Rev. D22, 343 (1980)

1980
[22]

R. D. Daniels and G. M. Shore, ’Faster than light’ photons and charged black holes, Nucl. Phys. B425, 634 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9310114

1994 arXiv
[23]

G. M. Shore, ’Faster than light’ photons in gravitational fields: Causality, anomalies and horizons, Nucl. Phys. B460, 379 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9504041

1996 arXiv
[24]

R. D. Daniels and G. M. Shore, ’Faster than light’ photons and rotating black holes, Phys. Lett. B367, 75 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9508048

1996 arXiv
[25]

G. M. Shore, Superluminality and UV completion, Nucl. Phys. B778, 219 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0701185

2007 arXiv
[26]

H. T. Cho, ’Faster than light’ photons in dilaton black hole space-times, Phys. Rev. D56, 6416 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9704014

1997 arXiv
[27]

Izumi, Causal Structures in Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys

K. Izumi, Causal Structures in Gauss-Bonnet gravity, Phys. Rev. D90, 044037 (2014), arXiv:1406.0677 [gr-qc]

2014 arXiv
[28]

Reall, N

H. Reall, N. Tanahashi, and B. Way, Causality and Hyperbolicity of Lovelock Theories, Class. Quant. Grav.31, 205005 (2014), arXiv:1406.3379 [hep-th]

2014 arXiv
[29]

Allahyari, M

A. Allahyari, M. Khodadi, S. Vagnozzi, and D. F. Mota, Magnetically charged black holes from non-linear electrodynamics and the Event Horizon Telescope, JCAP02, 003, arXiv:1912.08231 [gr-qc]

1912 arXiv
[30]

Cao and L.-B

L.-M. Cao and L.-B. Wu, Hyperbolicity and Causality of Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Gravity in Warped Product Spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D103, 064054 (2021), arXiv:2101.02461 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[31]

H. S. Reall, Causality in gravitational theories with second order equations of motion, Phys. Rev. D103, 084027 (2021), arXiv:2101.11623 [gr-qc]

2021 arXiv
[32]

Davies and H

I. Davies and H. S. Reall, Well-posed formulation of Einstein-Maxwell effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D106, 104019 (2022), arXiv:2112.05603 [gr-qc]

2022 arXiv
[33]

L. Fu, K. Izumi, and D. Yoshida, Consistency between bulk and boundary causalities in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes, JHEP10, 184, arXiv:2504.15910 [gr-qc]
[34]

M. M. Takahashi and K. Nakashi, Ellis-Bronnikov Wormhole Shadows with Spherically Symmetric Accretion Flow, (2026), arXiv:2606.01699 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[35]

H. G. Ellis, Ether flow through a drainhole - a particle model in general relativity, J. Math. Phys.14, 104 (1973)

1973
[36]

K. A. Bronnikov, Scalar-tensor theory and scalar charge, Acta Phys. Polon. B4, 251 (1973)

1973
[37]

Einstein, Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in the Gravitational Field, Science84, 506 (1936)

A. Einstein, Lens-Like Action of a Star by the Deviation of Light in the Gravitational Field, Science84, 506 (1936)

1936
[38]

Chen and J

S. Chen and J. Jing, Strong gravitational lensing for the photons coupled to Weyl tensor in a Schwarzschild black hole spacetime, JCAP10, 002, arXiv:1502.01088 [gr-qc]

arXiv
[39]

Lu, F.-W

X. Lu, F.-W. Yang, and Y. Xie, Strong gravitational field time delay for photons coupled to Weyl tensor in a Schwarzschild black hole, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 357 (2016), arXiv:1606.02932 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[40]

S. Chen, S. Wang, Y. Huang, J. Jing, and S. Wang, Strong gravitational lensing for the photons coupled to a Weyl tensor in a Kerr black hole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D95, 104017 (2017), arXiv:1611.08783 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[41]

Clement, Scattering of Klein-Gordon and Maxwell Waves by an Ellis Geometry, Int

G. Clement, Scattering of Klein-Gordon and Maxwell Waves by an Ellis Geometry, Int. J. Theor. Phys.23, 335 (1984)

1984
[42]

K. K. Nandi, Y.-Z. Zhang, and A. V. Zakharov, Gravitational lensing by wormholes, Phys. Rev. D74, 024020 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0602062

2006 arXiv
[43]

T. K. Dey and S. Sen, Gravitational lensing by wormholes, Mod. Phys. Lett. A23, 953 (2008), arXiv:0806.4059 [gr-qc]

2008 arXiv
[44]

Muller, Exact geometric optics in a Morris-Thorne wormhole spacetime, Phys

T. Muller, Exact geometric optics in a Morris-Thorne wormhole spacetime, Phys. Rev. D77, 044043 (2008)

2008
[45]

Bhattacharya and A

A. Bhattacharya and A. A. Potapov, Bending of light in Ellis wormhole geometry, Mod. Phys. Lett. A25, 2399 (2010)

2010
[46]

G. W. Gibbons and M. Vyska, The Application of Weierstrass elliptic functions to Schwarzschild Null Geodesics, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 065016 (2012), arXiv:1110.6508 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[47]

Nakajima and H

K. Nakajima and H. Asada, Deflection angle of light in an Ellis wormhole geometry, Phys. Rev. D85, 107501 (2012), arXiv:1204.3710 [gr-qc]

2012 arXiv
[48]

Tsukamoto and T

N. Tsukamoto and T. Harada, There are no rotating stars of a perfect fluid in Hoˇ rava-Lifshitz gravity, Galaxies1, 261 (2013), arXiv:1201.1738 [gr-qc]

2013 arXiv
[49]

Tsukamoto, Strong deflection limit analysis and gravitational lensing of an Ellis wormhole, Phys

N. Tsukamoto, Strong deflection limit analysis and gravitational lensing of an Ellis wormhole, Phys. Rev. D94, 124001 (2016), arXiv:1607.07022 [gr-qc]

2016 arXiv
[50]

Tsukamoto, Deflection angle in the strong deflection limit in a general asymptotically flat, static, spherically symmetric spacetime, Phys

N. Tsukamoto, Deflection angle in the strong deflection limit in a general asymptotically flat, static, spherically symmetric spacetime, Phys. Rev. D95, 064035 (2017), arXiv:1612.08251 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[51]

Tsukamoto, Retrolensing by a wormhole at deflection anglesπand 3π, Phys

N. Tsukamoto, Retrolensing by a wormhole at deflection anglesπand 3π, Phys. Rev. D95, 084021 (2017), arXiv:1701.09169 [gr-qc]

2017 arXiv
[52]

Jusufi, Deflection angle of light by wormholes using the Gauss–Bonnet theorem, Int

K. Jusufi, Deflection angle of light by wormholes using the Gauss–Bonnet theorem, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys.14, 1750179 (2017), arXiv:1706.01244 [gr-qc]. 19

2017 arXiv
[53]

T. Cai, H. Huang, Z. Wang, and M. Zhu, Higher-order correction to weak-field lensing of an Ellis-Bronnikov wormhole, Phys. Rev. D108, 023004 (2023), arXiv:2302.13704 [gr-qc]

2023 arXiv
[54]

Claudel, K

C.-M. Claudel, K. S. Virbhadra, and G. F. R. Ellis, The Geometry of photon surfaces, J. Math. Phys.42, 818 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0005050

2001 arXiv
[55]

Teo, Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole, Gen

E. Teo, Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole, Gen. Rel. Grav.35, 1909 (2003)

2003
[56]

Jusufi and A

K. Jusufi and A. ¨Ovg¨ un, Gravitational Lensing by Rotating Wormholes, Phys. Rev. D97, 024042 (2018), arXiv:1708.06725 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv
[57]

T. Ono, A. Ishihara, and H. Asada, Deflection angle of light for an observer and source at finite distance from a rotating wormhole, Phys. Rev. D98, 044047 (2018), arXiv:1806.05360 [gr-qc]

2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Falcke, F

H. Falcke, F. Melia, and E. Agol, Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center, Astrophys. J. Lett.528, L13 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/9912263

arXiv 2000

[2] [2]

Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Super- massive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

arXiv 2019

[3] [3]

Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

K. Akiyamaet al.(Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

arXiv 2022

[4] [4]

Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class

S. Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class. Quant. Grav.40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2023

[5] [5]

K. S. Virbhadra and G. F. R. Ellis, Schwarzschild black hole lensing, Phys. Rev. D62, 084003 (2000), arXiv:astro- ph/9904193

arXiv 2000

[6] [6]

Bozza, S

V. Bozza, S. Capozziello, G. Iovane, and G. Scarpetta, Strong field limit of black hole gravitational lensing, Gen. Rel. Grav.33, 1535 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0102068

arXiv 2001

[7] [7]

Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys

V. Bozza, Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002), arXiv:gr-qc/0208075

arXiv 2002

[8] [8]

G. W. Gibbons and M. C. Werner, Applications of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem to gravitational lensing, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 235009 (2008), arXiv:0807.0854 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2008