Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 47 references

Agentic Anomaly Detection with ORCA-Style Dynamic Inductive Bias Adaptation in Multimodal Wearable Time Series Data

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adaptive temporal context selection matches best hand-tuned anomaly detectors.

desk verdict A genuinely useful lightweight adaptive-receptive-field idea is undermined by an unreconciled internal contradiction between Table 1 and Table S5. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08859 v1 pith:RUJ4TXNB submitted 2026-08-09 cs.LG cs.AI

Anushka Roy , Jyotirmoy Singh , Shreea Bose , Chittaranjan Hota This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords temporalreceptivefieldagenticcontrolanomalydetectionwirelessbodyareanetworksphysiologicaltimeseriesinductivebiasadaptationconstant-normalizationattention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the temporal receptive field—the amount of history an anomaly detector considers—should be chosen per input window rather than fixed in advance. It proposes ORCA, a lightweight detector whose supervisory controller reads cheap statistics such as average variance and autocorrelation and picks one of three context lengths at inference time. Across a custom wearable WBAN dataset and the MIMIC-IV clinical benchmark, the adaptive choice matches or slightly beats the best fixed context on AUROC and AUPRC while removing the need for dataset-specific tuning of the temporal horizon. The paper reads this as evidence that state-dependent inductive-bias control is a practical design principle for nonstationary physiological time series under edge constraints.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the agentic controller defined in Supplementary Equation S5. It maps a window to a discrete choice of temporal receptive field $k \in \{1,3,5\}$ using two averaged statistics: mean per-channel variance and mean per-channel sample autocorrelation. High variance selects $k=1$, high autocorrelation selects $k=5$, and the default is $k=3$. That choice sets the support of the relative-position bias matrix $B^{(k)}$ added to ConSmax attention scores, so the detector's effective memory is truncated to the selected neighborhood; MinGRU supplies gated hidden states without recurrent weight matrices in the candidate. No trainable parameters are added by the controller, which is what makes the adaptation agentic in the paper's usage: a policy outside the gradient loop governs a structural inductive bias.

What would settle it

Run ORCA, with its controller thresholds fixed as in the paper, on a new public physiological dataset that contains clearly labeled short transients and slow drifts. The central claim fails if the adaptive policy's AUROC or AUPRC falls below the best fixed $k$ on either regime, or if the optimal threshold values change between subjects by more than a small amount.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

ORCA claims that the need to pre-tune a temporal horizon can be eliminated by letting a deterministic controller change the attention span online. Concretely, the controller computes the average signal variance and the average autocorrelation over the current window and sets the receptive field to $k=1$ under high volatility, $k=5$ under high autocorrelation, and $k=3$ otherwise; this $k$ truncates the relative-position bias in a constant-normalization attention head built on a minimal gated recurrent backbone. On ORCA's custom WBAN dataset the adaptive policy reaches AUROC 0.9993 (fixed $k=3$: 0.9994) and on MIMIC-IV 0.9977 (fixed $k=3$: 0.9974). The paper also reports that during anomalous events the controller shifts from short contexts to $k=5$ in 73% of windows, which it presents as evidence that the adaptation tracks physiological regime rather than acting randomly.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that one fixed pair of decision thresholds for variance and autocorrelation correctly separates signal regimes across every sensor channel and patient; the paper never reports the threshold values or shows that they transfer.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Anomaly detectors on edge devices can drop the dataset-specific search over temporal horizons and instead adjust their memory online at no extra parameter cost.
  • The controller's behavior is interpretable: it lengthens the context as an anomalous window approaches and shortens it afterward, so the selected $k$ can act as an event-aligned diagnostic signal.
  • In medium-volatility regimes where no single fixed context is clearly right, adaptive selection preserves AUROC while fixed-$k$ baselines degrade.
  • Because the adaptation lives in a truncated relative-position bias, the same controller idea transfers to any attention-based sequence model that accepts a variable-length neighborhood.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the threshold values $\tau_{\mathrm{vol}}$ and $\tau_{\mathrm{corr}}$ are never reported, so a reimplementation cannot reproduce the controller from the text alone; this omission leaves open whether the constants are dataset-specific.
  • Inference: since the WBAN metrics are saturated above 0.999, the strongest case for adaptive control in this paper is removing tuning effort and stabilizing latency, not raising the accuracy ceiling; a harder benchmark with subtler contextual anomalies would be needed to expose detection gains.
  • Inference: the controller's preference for $k=5$ during anomalous windows could be turned into an unsupervised anomaly-confidence score, giving a low-cost way to rank or localize events without labels.
  • Inference: the same variance-and-autocorrelation probes could be attached to forecasting or classification heads, since the only requirement is a mechanism that accepts a variable-length context.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ORCA, an anomaly detection framework for multivariate wearable/clinical time series in which a supervisory controller dynamically selects the temporal receptive field (k in {1,3,5}) at inference time from lightweight statistics (variance and autocorrelation). The controller is not trained and adds no parameters; the detection module combines a MinGRU backbone with constant-normalization attention and a relative positional bias truncated to the selected k. The authors evaluate ORCA on a custom WBAN dataset and a MIMIC-IV-derived clinical benchmark, reporting AUROC/AUPRC near 0.99 in Table 1 and claiming that adaptive selection matches the best fixed-context baseline while removing the need to tune the temporal horizon. Supplementary material includes algorithm listings, proofs of gradient preservation and softmax-equivalence conditions, an ablation study, latency/memory analyses, and regime-stratified results.

Significance. If the central claim holds, ORCA is a useful practical contribution: it addresses a real deployment problem for edge WBANs, adds no trainable parameters, and could reduce hyperparameter tuning for temporal context. The paper is also transparent in shipping a public code repository and in providing explicit algorithmic pseudocode. However, the empirical support for the main claim is undermined by internal contradictions between the main tables and the supplementary tables, and by missing values for the controller thresholds. The near-saturated aggregate metrics also make it difficult to verify the claimed benefit of adaptation. In its current state, the paper is not yet publishable, but the core idea is defensible and the empirical issues appear addressable with additional reporting and analysis.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6.1, Table 1 vs. Table S5] The MIMIC-IV results are internally inconsistent. Table 1 reports AUROC 0.9977 for adaptive k and the text says ORCA shows 'conservative generalization behavior without performance collapse,' but Table S5 reports AUROC 0.4448 in the medium-volatility regime and 0.3611 in the high-volatility regime for the same ORCA model. A pooled AUROC of 0.9977 cannot be reconciled with regime AUROCs below 0.45 unless the low-volatility regime overwhelmingly dominates the test set. The paper must report regime sizes, label fractions, and the pooled computation; as written, either Table 1 or Table S5 is wrong. In addition, Table 2 reports full ORCA on MIMIC-IV as 0.9983, which differs from the 0.9977 in Table 1; the discrepancy must be explained as well.
  2. [Section 4.2 and Supplementary Algorithm 2, Eq. (S5)] The adaptive policy is under-specified because tau_vol and tau_corr are never reported. These thresholds are the parameters that determine whether k=1, k=5, or k=3 is selected at each window. Without their values or a description of how they were chosen, the method cannot be reproduced, and the claim that ORCA eliminates the need to tune temporal horizons is incomplete, because the thresholds themselves are free parameters that presumably required some selection procedure. Please report the threshold values, the selection method, sensitivity analysis, and whether a single threshold setting works across both datasets and all signal regimes.
  3. [Section G.3, Table S3 and Figure S1] The WBAN regime analysis contradicts itself. Table S3 reports identical AUROC (0.9991) for k=1, k=3, k=5, and ORCA in the medium-volatility regime, while the text around Figure S1 claims that fixed receptive field configurations exhibit a 'noticeable drop' in this same regime. If the fixed baselines do not actually drop, the claimed benefit of agentic adaptation in the medium-volatility regime is not demonstrated. If they do drop, Table S3 is incorrect. The table and the narrative must be reconciled before the results can be interpreted.
  4. [Section 6.3, Table 2] The ablation study is not discriminating: all variants, including random k, achieve AUROC within 0.0001 of each other on both datasets (e.g., 0.9982-0.9983 on MIMIC-IV). The paper's claim that a random policy 'fails to produce systematic gains' is unsupported, because no variant produces a systematic gain; the metrics are saturated. The authors should evaluate on non-saturated subsets such as the medium- and high-volatility regimes from Table S5, or should temper the claim about the agent's contribution to the observed performance.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.6] The final sentence of Section 5.6 is incomplete and ungrammatical; it should be rewritten to state the implementation settings and threshold-selection details that are deferred to the Supplementary Material.
  2. [Section 4.1 / Algorithm numbering] The main text lists Algorithm 1 as the ORCA algorithm but then refers to 'Algorithm 2' in the same section; the numbering between the main text and the Supplementary Material should be unified.
  3. [Supplementary Appendix C] Appendix C describes the controller as using 'instantaneous signal entropy' and interpreting K=5 as 'high stationarity,' which conflicts with Algorithm 2's variance/autocorrelation rule; these descriptions should be aligned.
  4. [References] The MIMIC-IV reference contains the garbled phrase 'lessons et al. Andreo'; the citation should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: ORCA's adaptive controller is a declared heuristic, and no prediction reduces to fitted inputs or self-cited results.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is empirical: an adaptive receptive field policy, defined by the fixed threshold rules in Supplementary Eq. S5, matches fixed-context baselines on held-out test sets. The policy is explicitly acknowledged as a heuristic ('the supervisory agent relies on deterministic, heuristic decision boundaries derived from lightweight statistical probes', Section 7.2), so the paper does not pretend to derive adaptation from first principles. The adaptive results in Table 1 are not constructed from the reported AUROC values; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and the thresholds tau_vol and tau_corr are not even reported, which is a reproducibility limitation but not a circular reduction. The only self-citation, Bagadia et al. (2025), appears in Related Work as background on convolutional transformer networks for WBAN anomaly detection and is not load-bearing for ORCA's design or evaluation. The supplementary oracle statement, k*_t = arg min E[L_BCE], is explicitly labeled as an approximation rather than used to derive the policy. Potential concerns such as the MIMIC-IV regime-stratified AUROC discrepancy between Table S5 and Table 1, or the unreported threshold values, are internal-consistency and verification issues, not cases where the derivation reduces to its own inputs. No equation in the paper is equivalent by construction to a claimed output, and no uniqueness or ansatz is imported from prior author work. The derivation chain is therefore not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on two unreported threshold parameters and on the local stationarity assumption stated in the appendix. No new physical or model entity is invented beyond the ORCA system itself, which is composed of known components.

free parameters (2)
  • tau_vol (volatility threshold) = Not reported
    Used in Supplementary Algorithm 2, Equation S5: if mean variance exceeds tau_vol, select k=1. The value is never reported, so it cannot be reproduced or audited.
  • tau_corr (autocorrelation threshold) = Not reported
    Used in Supplementary Algorithm 2, Equation S5: if mean autocorrelation lag exceeds tau_corr, select k=5. The value is never reported, so it cannot be reproduced or audited.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Physiological signals are globally nonstationary but locally stationary within bounded temporal neighborhoods.
    Assumption B.4 in the supplementary material. The entire adaptive receptive field rationale depends on this, but the paper does not test whether the datasets actually satisfy it.
  • ad hoc to paper The fixed thresholds tau_vol and tau_corr generalize across subjects, datasets, and physiological regimes.
    The controller policy in Algorithm 2 is a hand-specified threshold rule. The paper provides no sensitivity analysis and does not report the threshold values.
  • domain assumption Window-level labels inherited from the final time step are a valid supervision signal for contextual anomalies.
    Section E.4 in the supplementary material. The anomaly detection formulation assigns all windows a binary label based on their last time step, which may dilute or misassign labels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Agentic Anomaly Detection with ORCA-Style Dynamic Inductive Bias Adaptation in Multimodal Wearable Time Series Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RUJ4TXNB

@misc{pith2026260808859,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Agentic Anomaly Detection with ORCA-Style Dynamic Inductive Bias Adaptation in Multimodal Wearable Time Series Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RUJ4TXNB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08859}
}
read the original abstract

Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) generate multivariate physiological time series that are highly nonstationary and must often be processed under strict computational and memory constraints. A critical yet underexplored challenge in this setting is selecting an appropriate temporal receptive field, which serves as a strong inductive bias for anomaly detection models. Existing approaches typically rely on fixed temporal contexts, which can perform inconsistently across heterogeneous signal regimes and require dataset-specific tuning. We propose ORCA, an agentically controlled anomaly detection framework that dynamically adapts the temporal receptive field at inference time based on lightweight signal statistics. Rather than introducing additional trainable parameters or learned policies, ORCA employs a supervisory controller that autonomously selects among discrete temporal contexts, enabling state-dependent inductive bias adaptation without retraining. Across a custom WBAN dataset, ORCA achieves performance comparable to the strongest fixed-context baselines (AUROC = 0.99) while eliminating the need to tune temporal horizons in advance. We further evaluate ORCA on MIMIC-IV as a challenging out-of-distribution benchmark, observing conservative generalization behavior without performance collapse under heterogeneous clinical conditions. These results highlight adaptive temporal inductive bias control as a practical and robust design principle for anomaly detection in resource-constrained, nonstationary physiological time series.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08859 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Agentic ORCA Architecture for Edge WBANs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Event-aligned evolution of the selected receptive field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of temporal receptive field selections made by the supervisory agent across test [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relative peak memory usage of different attention mechanisms. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Health Leadership and Quality of Life , year =

    Bekhruzbek Kadirov and Janna Nazarova and Nigora Alikulova and Rasuljon Shermatov and Sokhiba Narkulova and Utkir Farmonov and Nodira Alimukhamedova , title =. Health Leadership and Quality of Life , year =

    work page

  2. [2]

    Stojanovi

    Abdu Ibrahim Adamu and Praveen Kumar Donta and Darmawaty Mohd Ali and Sohail Sarang and Goran M. Stojanovi. A Systematic Literature Review of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques in Wireless Body Area Networks: Application, Challenges, and Future Directions , journal =. 2025 , volume =

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Khurshid and Mahmoud Othman , title =

    Abqa Javed and Muhammad Awais and Muhammad Shoaib and Khaldoon S. Khurshid and Mahmoud Othman , title =. PeerJ Computer Science , year =

    work page

  4. [4]

    Rama Krishna , title =

    Mohd Ahsan Siddiqui and Mala Kalra and C. Rama Krishna , title =. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience , year =

    work page

  5. [5]

    Rassam , title =

    Albatul Albattah and Murad A. Rassam , title =. Sensors , year =

    work page

  6. [6]

    An ECG Monitoring System For Prediction Of Cardiac Anomalies Using WBAN , booktitle =

    Medina Hadjem and Osman Salem and Farid Na. An ECG Monitoring System For Prediction Of Cardiac Anomalies Using WBAN , booktitle =. 2014 , pages =

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Khan and Aftab Hussain Tabasam and Abdul Latif , title =

    Aftab Arif and Fadia Shah and Muhammad Ismaeel Khan and Ali Raza A. Khan and Aftab Hussain Tabasam and Abdul Latif , title =. Migration Letters , year =

    work page

  8. [8]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Sensors , year =

    Granth Bagadia and Shreea Bose and Chittaranjan Hota , title =. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Sensors , year =

    work page

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Aljumaily and Sherwan Jalal Abdullah , title =

    Mustafa S. Aljumaily and Sherwan Jalal Abdullah , title =. International Journal of Mechatronics, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence , year =

  2. [11]

    Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting , journal =

    Bryan Lim and Sercan. Temporal Fusion Transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting , journal =. 2021 , volume =

    2021

  3. [12]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Khaled Alomar and Halil Ibrahim Aysel and Xiaohao Cai , title =. arXiv preprint , year =. 2407.06162 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  4. [13]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Leo Feng and Frederick Tung and Mohamed Osama Ahmed and Yoshua Bengio and Hossein Hajimirsadeghi , title =. arXiv preprint , year =. 2410.01201 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  5. [15]

    Gomez and

    Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer and Niki Parmar and Jakob Uszkoreit and Llion Jones and Aidan N. Gomez and. Attention Is All You Need , journal =. 2017 , volume =

    2017

  6. [16]

    Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action Segmentation , booktitle =

    Colin Lea and Ren. Temporal Convolutional Networks: A Unified Approach to Action Segmentation , booktitle =. 2016 , eprint =

    2016

  7. [17]

    Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL) , year =

    Peter Shaw and Jakob Uszkoreit and Ashish Vaswani , title =. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL) , year =. 1803.02155 , archivePrefix =

    2018 arXiv

  8. [20]

    Jayarekha , title =

    P. Jayarekha , title =. Journal of Neonatal Surgery , year =

  9. [21]

    arXiv preprint , year =

    Emanuele La Malfa and Ping Zhu and Samuele Marro and Sara Bernardini and Michael Wooldridge , title =. arXiv preprint , year =. 2512.09629 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  10. [23]

    IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , year =

    Kapal Dev and Sunder Ali Khowaja and Engin Zeydan and Keshav Singh and Merouane Debbah , title =. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine , year =

  11. [24]

    Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-25) , year =

    Jia-Hong Huang and Yixian Shen and Hongyi Zhu and Stevan Rudinac and Evangelos Kanoulas , title =. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-25) , year =. 2412.19616 , archivePrefix =

    arXiv

  12. [25]

    Alistair E. W. Johnson and others , title =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  13. [26]

    Johnson, Alistair E. W. and Bulgarelli, Luca and Shen, Longxiang and Gayles, Anne and Andreo, lessons et al. , title =. Scientific Data , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  14. [27]

    Stojanovi \'c , and Suzi Seroja Sarnin

    Abdu Ibrahim Adamu, Praveen Kumar Donta, Darmawaty Mohd Ali, Sohail Sarang, Goran M. Stojanovi \'c , and Suzi Seroja Sarnin. A systematic literature review of advanced machine learning techniques in wireless body area networks: Application, challenges, and future directions. I...

    2025

  15. [28]

    Albatul Albattah and Murad A. Rassam. A correlation-based anomaly detection model for wireless body area networks using convolutional long short-term memory neural network. Sensors, 22 0 (5): 0 1951, 2022. doi:10.3390/s22051951

    1951 doi

  16. [29]

    Aljumaily and Sherwan Jalal Abdullah

    Mustafa S. Aljumaily and Sherwan Jalal Abdullah. Deep learning for enhanced anomaly detection in wireless communication networks using channel state information. International Journal of Mechatronics, Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence, 1 0 (2): 0 104--113, 2025. doi:10.339...

    2025 doi

  17. [30]

    Rnns, cnns and transformers in human action recognition: A survey and a hybrid model

    Khaled Alomar, Halil Ibrahim Aysel, and Xiaohao Cai. Rnns, cnns and transformers in human action recognition: A survey and a hybrid model. arXiv preprint, 2024

    2024

  18. [31]

    Khan, Aftab Hussain Tabasam, and Abdul Latif

    Aftab Arif, Fadia Shah, Muhammad Ismaeel Khan, Ali Raza A. Khan, Aftab Hussain Tabasam, and Abdul Latif. Anomaly detection in ioht using deep learning: Enhancing wearable medical device security. Migration Letters, 20 0 (S12): 0 1992--2006, 2023. ISSN 1741-8984

    1992

  19. [32]

    A convolutional transformer network for anomaly detection in wireless body area networks

    Granth Bagadia, Shreea Bose, and Chittaranjan Hota. A convolutional transformer network for anomaly detection in wireless body area networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Sensors, 2: 0 185--198, 2025. doi:10.1109/JSAS.2025.3572860

    2025

  20. [33]

    Advanced architectures integrated with agentic ai for next-generation wireless networks

    Kapal Dev, Sunder Ali Khowaja, Engin Zeydan, Keshav Singh, and Merouane Debbah. Advanced architectures integrated with agentic ai for next-generation wireless networks. IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, 2025. doi:10.1109/MCOMSTD.2025.3632205

    2025

  21. [34]

    Were rnns all we needed? arXiv preprint, 2024

    Leo Feng, Frederick Tung, Mohamed Osama Ahmed, Yoshua Bengio, and Hossein Hajimirsadeghi. Were rnns all we needed? arXiv preprint, 2024

    2024

  22. [35]

    An ecg monitoring system for prediction of cardiac anomalies using wban

    Medina Hadjem, Osman Salem, and Farid Na \"i t-Abdesselam. An ecg monitoring system for prediction of cardiac anomalies using wban. In 2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom), pp.\ 441--446, 2014. doi:10.1109/Health...

    2014

  23. [36]

    Temporal convolutional networks for anomaly detection in time series

    Yangdong He and Jiabao Zhao. Temporal convolutional networks for anomaly detection in time series. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, ICAACE 2019, volume 1213, pp.\ 042050. IOP Publishing, 2019. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1213/4/042050

    2019 doi

  24. [37]

    Gradient weight-normalized low-rank projection for efficient llm training

    Jia-Hong Huang, Yixian Shen, Hongyi Zhu, Stevan Rudinac, and Evangelos Kanoulas. Gradient weight-normalized low-rank projection for efficient llm training. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-25), 2025

    2025

  25. [38]

    Motaharul Islam and Md

    Md. Motaharul Islam and Md. Shamshuzzoha. Securing wireless body area networks data transmission with machine learning: A cross-tier framework for anomaly detection and intrusion prevention. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Reports, 2: 0 100031, 2025. doi:10.1016/j.c...

    2025

  26. [39]

    Khurshid, and Mahmoud Othman

    Abqa Javed, Muhammad Awais, Muhammad Shoaib, Khaldoon S. Khurshid, and Mahmoud Othman. Machine learning and deep learning approaches in iot. PeerJ Computer Science, 9: 0 e1204, 2023. doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.1204

    2023 doi

  27. [40]

    Jayarekha

    P. Jayarekha. Smart edge devices: Integrating deep learning with iot for real-time electronics applications. Journal of Neonatal Surgery, 14 0 (25s): 0 232--237, 2025. ISSN 2226-0439

    2025

  28. [41]

    Alistair E. W. Johnson, Luca Bulgarelli, Longxiang Shen, Anne Gayles, and lessons et al. Andreo. Mimic-iv, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Scientific Data, 10 0 (1): 0 1--13, 2023. doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x

    2023 doi

  29. [42]

    Alistair E. W. Johnson et al. Mimic-iv (version 3.1). PhysioNet, 2024. RRID:SCR\_007345

    2024

  30. [43]

    Abnormality detection in wireless medical sensor networks using machine learning model

    Bekhruzbek Kadirov, Janna Nazarova, Nigora Alikulova, Rasuljon Shermatov, Sokhiba Narkulova, Utkir Farmonov, and Nodira Alimukhamedova. Abnormality detection in wireless medical sensor networks using machine learning model. Health Leadership and Quality of Life, 3 0 (180), 202...

    2024 doi

  31. [44]

    Colin Lea, Ren \'e Vidal, Austin Reiter, and Gregory D. Hager. Temporal convolutional networks: A unified approach to action segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ECCV Workshops), 2016

    2016

  32. [45]

    Arik, Nicolas Loeff, and Tomas Pfister

    Bryan Lim, Sercan \"O . Arik, Nicolas Loeff, and Tomas Pfister. Temporal fusion transformers for interpretable multi-horizon time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 37 0 (4): 0 1748--1764, 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.03.012

    2021 doi

  33. [46]

    Consmax: Hardware-friendly alternative softmax with learnable parameters

    Shiwei Liu, Guanchen Tao, Yifei Zou, Derek Chow, Zichen Fan, Kauna Lei, Bangfei Pan, Dennis Sylvester, Gregory Kielian, and Mehdi Saligane. Consmax: Hardware-friendly alternative softmax with learnable parameters. In ICCAD '24: Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE/ACM International Co...

    2024

  34. [47]

    An end-to-end planning framework with agentic llms and pddl

    Emanuele La Malfa, Ping Zhu, Samuele Marro, Sara Bernardini, and Michael Wooldridge. An end-to-end planning framework with agentic llms and pddl. In arXiv preprint, 2025

    2025

  35. [48]

    Agentic large language models, a survey

    Aske Plaat, Max van Duijn, Niki van Stein, Mike Preuss, Peter van der Putten, and Kees Joost Batenburg. Agentic large language models, a survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 1 0 (1): 0 1--76, 2025. doi:10.1613/jair.1.18675

    2025 doi

  36. [49]

    Self-attention with relative position representations

    Peter Shaw, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Ashish Vaswani. Self-attention with relative position representations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL), 2018

    2018

  37. [50]

    Rama Krishna

    Mohd Ahsan Siddiqui, Mala Kalra, and C. Rama Krishna. Adsban: Anomaly detection system for body area networks utilizing iot and machine learning. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 36 0 (13): 0 e8075, 2024. doi:10.1002/cpe.8075

    2024 doi

  38. [51]

    Gomez, ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, ukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  39. [52]

    Arjun Warrier and Abhilash K. S. Hybrid edge-cloud ai gateway with 1d-cnn for real-time anomaly detection and temporal fusion transformer for healthcare data streams. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Innovative Data Communication Technologies and Applicati...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.