Modified Double Copy for Quasitopological Gravity with Matter

Valeri P. Frolov

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 24 references

Modified Double Copy for Quasitopological Gravity with Matter

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that exact spherically symmetric solutions of quasitopological gravity coupled to matter can be generated by solving an auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics problem in flat (D+1)-dimensional spacetime and reading off the…

desk verdict The matter-coupled modified double copy for quasitopological gravity is internally consistent and genuinely new within the author's program; it is an incremental but sound extension that deserves a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08988 v1 pith:MJU2UJG3 submitted 2026-08-10 gr-qc hep-th

Valeri P. Frolov This is my paper · ORCID

classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.50.Kd04.20.Jb

keywords quasitopologicalgravitymodifieddoublecopyKerr-SchildmetricsnonlinearelectrodynamicsVaidya-typesolutionshigher-curvatureexactblackholes

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the modified double-copy construction to quasitopological gravity (QTG) coupled to matter, showing that exact spherically symmetric solutions can be built from an auxiliary gauge field living in a flat (D+1)-dimensional spacetime. For any QTG model defined by a generating function h(p), one chooses the auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian so that dL/dE = h(E); solving its field equations in flat space and restricting to a D-dimensional hyperplane yields the function p(v,r) that fixes the Kerr–Schild metric f = 1 - $r^{2}$ p. The construction applies to Maxwell, nonlinear electrodynamics, and Yang–Mills sources, covers static and Vaidya-type radiating solutions, and reduces to the standard Einstein double copy when h(p)=p. A reader would care because it turns a hard system of higher-curvature gravitational equations into a nonlinear electrodynamics problem in flat space.

What carries the argument

The central object is the generating function h(p) = Σ α_j p^j with α_1 = 1, which packages all higher-curvature couplings of QTG. The key move is the identification dL/dE = h(E) between the auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics Lagrangian L(E) in flat (D+1)-dimensional spacetime and the gravitational generating function. The auxiliary field equations reduce to H,R = -$R^{{D-1}}$ J^V and H,V = $R^{{D-1}}$ J^R with H = $R^{{D-1}}$ h(E); restricted to the equatorial hyperplane X^D = 0, these are exactly the QTG equations H,v = (2κ/(D-2)) σ and H,r = -(2κ/(D-2)) τ. The bridge between the two theories is the equality of the auxiliary electrostatic invariant E with the gravitational curvature invariant p, which produces the Kerr–Schild metric f = 1 - $r^{2}$ p.

What would settle it

Take a spherically symmetric matter source with non-zero radial pressure, such as a minimally coupled scalar field or an anisotropic fluid with T^r_r ≠ 0, and solve the QTG field equations in ingoing null coordinates; if the solution has N,r ≠ 0, then no coordinate redefinition can set N=1, the metric is not Kerr–Schild, and the identification E|Π = p cannot be made, showing the construction does not extend to general matter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's claim is that for quasitopological gravity the entire content of the spherically symmetric field equations with matter can be encoded in two functions, H(v,r) and the matter stress-energy components τ and σ, and that these same equations are exactly the equations of an auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics in one higher flat dimension. Given a QTG generating function h(p), the auxiliary Lagrangian is fixed by dL/dE = h(E). Once the auxiliary current is chosen to match (τ,σ), the solution's electrostatic invariant E restricted to the equatorial hyperplane equals the gravitational curvature invariant p, and the metric is reconstructed with N=1 as $ds^{2}$ = -$dv^{2}$ + 2dv dr + $r^{2}$ $dΩ^{2}$ and f(v,r)=1 - $r^{2}$ p(v,r). This dictionary gives exact solutions of the QTG field equations with matter, not approximations.

Load-bearing premise

The construction requires the matter stress-energy tensor to have the restricted form $T^{{μν}}$ = τ $γ^{{μν}}$ + σ k^μ k^ν with zero radial pressure T^r_r = 0; only then does the rr field equation force N,r = 0, so the metric can be put in Kerr–Schild form.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any QTG model with invertible h, exact static charged black-hole solutions with Maxwell or nonlinear-electrodynamics sources can be generated from flat-space auxiliary field solutions, bypassing direct integration of the higher-curvature equations.
Including a null current σ(v,r) produces Vaidya-type radiating metrics, so the same dictionary covers dynamical mass and charge evolution.
The standard Einstein double copy is contained as the h(p)=p limit, in which the auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics reduces to linear Maxwell theory.
The generalized Birkhoff theorem inherited from the restricted stress tensor means that, without null matter, the generated solutions are static.
The construction gives a unified route to regular black holes in QTG coupled to matter, since regularity can be studied at the level of p(v,r) and the generating function.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This suggests a useful cataloguing strategy: any spherically symmetric solution of nonlinear electrodynamics in flat (D+1)-dimensional spacetime automatically yields a QTG-with-matter metric, so scanning known NED solutions should generate new regular black-hole geometries.
The auxiliary field is not the physical matter field; for QTG coupled to real nonlinear electrodynamics, the physical source enters only through τ and σ, while the auxiliary Lagrangian is dictated by h. A natural test is whether physical NED solutions are reproduced exactly whenever their stress-energy matches the required (τ,σ) form.
Because the construction relies on T^r_r = 0, adding even a small radial pressure should break the dictionary at the level of the rr equation; probing this with a scalar-field source would show how sharp the boundary of the correspondence is.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing to know: this Letter works. The central equivalence maps the spherically symmetric QTG-with-matter equations onto an auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics problem in one higher dimension, and I could not find a step that breaks. The matter coupling is the actual new piece relative to Frolov's vacuum double-copy paper [7], and it is a legitimate extension rather than a repackaging. The dictionary is simple and explicit: pick the auxiliary NED Lagrangian so that dL/dE = h(E), choose the auxiliary current as in (27), restrict to the hyperplane, identify E|Π = p, and the reduced QTG equations (15) emerge. That is a clean, reproducible construction.

The paper also does several things well. It states the restrictions on the matter stress tensor clearly enough that someone could apply the method without rereading the prior literature. The generalized Birkhoff statement is used correctly. The Vaidya generalization falls out without extra work. The Einstein limit is checked. For a short Letter, the exposition is unusually easy to follow.

Soft spots, in proportion: the starting point (10) is imported from [20] without derivation, so the self-containedness is limited. That is fine for a Letter in an established program, but the referee should ask the author to flag it more prominently. Second, the paper advertises Maxwell, nonlinear electrodynamics, and Yang–Mills as applications, but it only sketches them; the matter field equations are not checked in detail. That is a scope statement, not a flaw in the solution-generating claim, but it means the title promises a bit more than the body demonstrates. The Yang–Mills case in particular is schematic. Third, the units and sign conventions in (22)–(27) are loose enough that a less careful reader could get lost; a short appendix or a table of conventions would help.

One concern raised in an earlier pass does not survive contact with the paper: the worry that Maxwell/NED/YM sources could violate T^r_r = 0 is based on an index misreading. The matter ansatz (11) gives T_rr = 0 identically, and the rr equation constrains N,r, not f. So that particular objection is not real.

Who is this for? People working on exact solutions in higher-curvature gravity, regular black holes, and the classical double copy. It will not change the field, but it gives a useful unified way to generate static and Vaidya solutions with matter. It should go to peer review. A serious referee can spend their time on the applications and on making the imported reduction more explicit; the core construction is sound.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the modified double-copy formalism of Ref. [7] to quasitopological gravity (QTG) coupled to matter. For spherically symmetric metrics in ingoing null coordinates, the QTG field equations are assumed to reduce to the system (10)–(15), where all higher-curvature information is encoded in H(v,r)=r^{D-1}h(p). For matter sources of the restricted form T_μν=τ γ_μν + σ k_μ k_ν, the paper introduces an auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics in a flat (D+1)-dimensional spacetime, chooses its Lagrangian so that dL/dE=h(E), and chooses the auxiliary current in terms of τ and σ. Solving the reduced auxiliary equations (23) and restricting to the equatorial hyperplane Π reproduces the QTG equations (15); the identification E|_Π=p and f=1−r²p then reconstructs the metric. The paper claims this applies to Maxwell, nonlinear electrodynamics, and Yang–Mills sources, to static and Vaidya-type solutions, and that it reduces to Einstein gravity for h(p)=p.

Significance. If correct, the paper gives a compact solution-generating dictionary for QTG with matter, extending the double-copy idea beyond vacuum. The algebraic derivation is explicit and checkable: Eqs. (23) with the current (27) do restrict to Eqs. (15), and the inversion h^{-1} closes the system via (16) and (31). The paper is honest that the auxiliary field is purely auxiliary (footnote 2) and that the identification E|_Π=p is what makes the construction work. The main caveats are that the reduction (10) is imported from Ref. [20] and that the advertised applications to Maxwell, nonlinear electrodynamics, and especially Yang–Mills are asserted rather than demonstrated. These caveats do not invalidate the central dictionary, which is internally consistent and reproduces the Einstein limit when h(p)=p.

major comments (1)

[Discussion and Abstract] The abstract and Discussion claim that the framework applies to Maxwell theory, nonlinear electrodynamics, and Yang–Mills theory, but the manuscript never writes down the matter field equations for these theories or checks that their on-shell stress-energy tensors have the form (11) with T_rr=0. The construction treats τ(v,r), σ(v,r), and T as prescribed sources satisfying only (14) and (15); for a genuine coupling one must also verify the matter equations of motion in the reconstructed metric. In particular, the Yang–Mills case is mentioned only schematically and no reference is supplied. Please either provide the explicit reduction for these matter models (an appendix would suffice) or soften the scope statement to 'prescribed sources of the form (11)' and refer to Ref. [20] for the nonlinear-electrodynamics and Vaidya examples.

minor comments (5)

[Eqs. (23)–(27)] The source-current notation is inconsistent: the variation of the reduced action (21) produces contravariant components J^V and J^R, whereas (23) and (27) print subscripts J_V and J_R. In the null coordinates (V,R) the flat metric has g^{VR}=1 and g^{RR}=1, so J^V=J_R and J^R=J_V+J_R; as written, Eqs. (23) do not literally follow from (21). The intended equations are recoverable, but the notation should be fixed for the derivation to be checkable.
[Eq. (10)] The reduction of the QTG field equations is imported from Ref. [20] without derivation or a statement of the assumptions needed (analyticity and invertibility of h on the physical branch, h'≠0 for the step N,r=0). A one-sentence summary of these conditions would make the Letter more self-contained.
[Eq. (22)] There is a stray comma in 'dL/dE = h(E), ,' that should be removed.
[Final paragraph before Discussion] The word 'electrodynamica' should be 'electrodynamics'.
[After Eq. (31)] The construction is a definitional dictionary rather than an independent dynamical duality: the auxiliary Lagrangian is fixed by dL/dE=h(E) and the correspondence is sealed by the identification E|_Π=p. The text already says this, but the Discussion's phrase 'replaces the direct solution ... by an auxiliary nonlinear electrodynamics problem' could overstate the distinction, since the auxiliary problem is the same pair of first-order equations. A brief explicit caveat would avoid overinterpretation.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The QTG-to-auxiliary-NED map is defined by matching dL/dE=h(E) and identifying E|Π=p, so the double copy reproduces the reduced QTG equations by construction rather than from an independent gauge theory.

self definitional [Eqs. (22), (23), (27), (29), (31) in 'MODIFIED DOUBLE-COPY METHOD OF SOLVING QTG EQUATIONS']
"To establish the correspondence between the auxiliary-field action and the QTG model, we choose the Lagrangian L(E) such that dL/dE = h(E). ... Equations (23), restricted to Π, give ... These are precisely the QTG equations (15). ... one restricts the solution to Π and identifies E|Π = p, (H/R^{D-2})|Π = h(p)."

The auxiliary theory is not independent: its Lagrangian is fixed by dL/dE=h(E), with h the QTG generating function, and its current is chosen in (27) to be exactly (2κ/(D-2)) times the matter stress-energy components τ,σ divided by R^{D-1}. With H defined as R^{D-1}h(E), equations (23) restricted to Π become literally equations (15), the already-reduced QTG field equations. The final identification E|Π=p and H/R^{D-2}|Π=h(p) (Eq. 31) is then the only bridge; but it is a definitional renaming, not an independent dynamical equivalence. Hence the metric f=1-r^2p is obtained by solving the same equations that define the QTG solution, so the double-copy step is equivalent to its input by construction.

full rationale

The paper is internally consistent and transparent about the auxiliary field being a device. The gravitational reduction (10) is taken from the author's prior work [20], but it is stated explicitly and used as input; citing it is normal and not itself circular. Likewise the modified double-copy framework from [7] is prior work. The central step, however, is definitional: Eq. (22) fixes the auxiliary NED Lagrangian by the QTG generating function h, Eq. (27) sets the auxiliary current from the same matter stress-energy components τ,σ that enter the QTG equations, and Eq. (31) identifies the auxiliary field invariant E with the gravitational invariant p. Under these definitions, equations (23) restricted to the equatorial hyperplane are exactly the reduced QTG equations (15). The metric is then reconstructed by f=1-r^2p, which is the QTG reconstruction formula (16) with p=h^{-1}(H/r^{D-1}). Thus the 'modified double copy with matter' does not derive QTG solutions from an independent gauge theory; it rewrites the known QTG reduction in flat-space auxiliary variables. This is a valid solution-generating dictionary, but the claimed correspondence is forced by construction rather than an independent physical equivalence. No parameter fitting or hidden data dependence is present. Score 6 reflects this central construction-by-definition, while acknowledging the paper's explicit caveats and scope statements.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted in this paper; the QTG couplings α_j and matter profiles are inputs, not outputs. The central construction relies on the prior reduction in [20], the restricted matter ansatz (11), invertibility of h, existence of smooth extensions of matter off the hyperplane, and the weak-field behavior of L(E). The one invented entity, the auxiliary gauge field, is a mathematical device without physical evidence.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The QTG action (2) reduces, under spherical symmetry, to the orbit-space equations (10) from Ref. [20].
The paper starts from these equations and does not re-derive them from the action; the entire construction inherits this reduction.
domain assumption The matter stress-energy tensor has the restricted form T^{μν} = τ γ^{μν} + σ k^μ k^ν with T^r_r = 0 (Eq. 11).
This ansatz selects matter that allows N = 1 and the Kerr-Schild gauge; generic sources with T^r_r ≠ 0 are outside the construction.
domain assumption The generating function h(p) is analytic and invertible on the physical branch.
Inverting p = h^{-1}(H/r^{D-1}) and identifying E|Π = p require a single-valued inverse.
domain assumption Smooth extensions of τ and σ away from the equatorial hyperplane Π exist and satisfy the compatibility condition (28).
The auxiliary current (27) is built from such extensions; the compatibility condition is the QTG conservation law, but the extensions themselves are not constructed.
domain assumption The auxiliary NED Lagrangian has weak-field behavior L(E) = 1/2 E^2 + O(E^3).
This guarantees the Einstein-gravity limit h(p) = p and the linear Maxwell regime.
standard math The tensor decomposition (6) and its conservation law (7) are standard differential geometry.
Used to split the QTG equations into orbit-space and angular parts; no new content.

invented entities (1)

Auxiliary gauge field A_a in flat (D+1)-dimensional spacetime
purpose: Serves as the 'single copy' whose solutions generate QTG-with-matter metrics via restriction to the equatorial hyperplane and the identification E|Π = p.
The field is explicitly auxiliary (footnote 2) and has no physical degrees of freedom or falsifiable predictions. Its Lagrangian is fixed by the QTG generating function h, so it carries no independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Modified Double Copy for Quasitopological Gravity with Matter." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MJU2UJG3

@misc{pith2026260808988,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Modified Double Copy for Quasitopological Gravity with Matter},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MJU2UJG3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08988}
}

abstract

We extend the modified double-copy construction to quasitopological gravity (QTG) coupled to matter. Spherically symmetric QTG solutions in $D$ dimensions are generated from an auxiliary gauge field in a flat $(D+1)$-dimensional spacetime. The gravitational field equations reduce to two relations determined by the QTG generating function and the matter stress--energy tensor. For a broad class of spherically symmetric matter sources, solutions of the auxiliary gauge-field equations can be used to construct exact solutions of the QTG field equations. The framework applies to Maxwell theory, nonlinear electrodynamics, and Yang--Mills theory, encompasses both static and Vaidya-type solutions, and reproduces the Einstein-gravity limit.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

[7]

The duality between color and kine- matics and its applications,

Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, “The duality between color and kine- matics and its applications,” (2019), arXiv:1909.01358 [hep-th]

arXiv 2019
[20]

Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,

J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio, “Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D113, 124004 (2026), arXiv:2602.16773 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2026
[1]

Consider nonlinear electrodynamics inM D+1 with ac- tion W= Z dD+1X L(E) + Z dD+1XJ aAa, E 2 =− 1 2 FabF ab

Denote R2 = DX a=1 X 2 a, V=T+R, K a =V ,a .(17) Then on the equatorial hyperplane Π the metricdS 2 0 co- incides with (13) and one has R Π =r, V Π =v, K A Π =k A.(18) Here Π denotes restriction to Π. Consider nonlinear electrodynamics inM D+1 with ac- tion W= Z dD+1X L(E) + Z dD+1XJ aAa, E 2 =− 1 2 FabF ab. (19) 2 Let us emphasize that this electromagnet...

work page
[2]

Some algebraically degenerate solutions of einstein’s gravitational field equations,

R. P. Kerr and A. Schild, “Some algebraically degenerate solutions of einstein’s gravitational field equations,” in Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 17 (American Mathematical Society, 1965) pp. 199–209

work page 1965
[3]

The Kerr spacetime: A Brief introduction,

M. Visser, “The Kerr spacetime: A Brief introduction,” inKerr Fest: Black Holes in Astrophysics, General Rela- tivity and Quantum Gravity(2007) arXiv:0706.0622 [gr- qc]

arXiv 2007
[4]

Black holes and the double copy,

R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, “Black holes and the double copy,” Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014), 10.1007/jhep12(2014)056

doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)056 2014
[5]

The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime,

A. Luna, R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, “The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime,” Physics Letters B750, 272 (2015)

work page 2015
[6]

The double copy: gravity from gluons,

C. D. White, “The double copy: gravity from gluons,” Contemporary Physics59, 109 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 24 references

[8]

Quasitopological gravity and double- copy formalism,

V. P. Frolov, “Quasitopological gravity and double- copy formalism,” Phys. Rev. D113, 064023 (2026), arXiv:2512.14674 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[9]

(Gener- alized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders,

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, and R. A. Hennigar, “(Gener- alized) quasi-topological gravities at all orders,” Class. Quant. Grav.37, 015002 (2020), arXiv:1909.07983 [hep- th]

2020 arXiv
[10]

All higher-curvature gravities as Generalized quasi-topological gravities,

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, J. Moreno, and ´A. Mur- cia, “All higher-curvature gravities as Generalized quasi-topological gravities,” JHEP11, 062 (2019), arXiv:1906.00987 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[11]

Regular black holes from pure gravity,

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, and R. A. Hennigar, “Regular black holes from pure gravity,” Phys. Lett. B861, 139260 (2025), arXiv:2403.04827 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[12]

Regular black holes inspired by quasitopological grav- ity,

V. P. Frolov, A. Koek, J. Pinedo Soto, and A. Zelnikov, “Regular black holes inspired by quasitopological grav- ity,” Phys. Rev. D111, 044034 (2025), arXiv:2411.16050 [gr-qc]

2025 arXiv
[13]

Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse,

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and A. J. Murcia, “Regular black holes from thin-shell collapse,” Phys. Rev. D111, 104009 (2025)

2025
[14]

Dynamical formation of regular black holes,

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and A. J. Murcia, “Dynamical formation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 181401 (2025)

2025
[15]

Regular geometries from singular matter in qua- sitopological gravity,

P. Bueno, R. A. Hennigar, A. J. Murcia, and A. Vicente- Cano, “Regular geometries from singular matter in qua- sitopological gravity,” Phys. Rev. D114, 024070 (2026)

2026
[16]

Regular black holes in quasitopological gravity: Null shells and mass inflation,

V. P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov, “Regular black holes in quasitopological gravity: Null shells and mass inflation,” (2026), arXiv:2601.01861 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[17]

Regular black holes in nonlocal quasitopological grav- ity,

P. Bueno, P. A. Cano, R. A. Hennigar, and A. J. Murcia, “Regular black holes in nonlocal quasitopological grav- ity,” (2026), arXiv:2607.07790 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[18]

g ttgrr =−1 black hole thermody- namics in extended quasi-topological gravity,

J. Borissova, “g ttgrr =−1 black hole thermody- namics in extended quasi-topological gravity,” (2026), arXiv:2604.24101 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[19]

Formation of extremal regular black holes,

J. Borissova, “Formation of extremal regular black holes,” (2026), arXiv:2608.02908 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[21]

Vaidya-Type Solutions of Quasitopological Gravity Interacting with Nonlinear Electrodynamics,

V. P. Frolov, C.-M. Yoo, and A. Zelnikov, “Vaidya-Type Solutions of Quasitopological Gravity Interacting with Nonlinear Electrodynamics,” (2026), arXiv:2607.22856 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv
[22]

Thermodynamics of regular black holes in anti-de Sitter space,

R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, S. Murk, and I. Soranidis, “Thermodynamics of regular black holes in anti-de Sitter space,” JHEP11, 121 (2025), arXiv:2505.11623 [gr-qc]

2025
[23]

Charged regular black holes from quasi-topological gravities in D≥5,

C.-H. Hao, J. Jing, and J. Wang, “Charged regular black holes from quasi-topological gravities in D≥5,” JCAP 05, 067 (2026), arXiv:2512.04604 [gr-qc]

2026
[24]

Charged black holes in quasitopological gravity coupled to Born-Infeld nonlin- ear electrodynamics,

J. Pinedo Soto and V. P. Frolov, “Charged black holes in quasitopological gravity coupled to Born-Infeld nonlin- ear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D113, 124044 (2026), arXiv:2604.06632 [gr-qc]

2026 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [7]

The duality between color and kine- matics and its applications,

Z. Bern, J. J. Carrasco, M. Chiodaroli, H. Johansson, and R. Roiban, “The duality between color and kine- matics and its applications,” (2019), arXiv:1909.01358 [hep-th]

arXiv 2019

[2] [20]

Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,

J. Borissova and R. Carballo-Rubio, “Regular black holes from pure gravity in four dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D113, 124004 (2026), arXiv:2602.16773 [gr-qc]

arXiv 2026

[3] [1]

Consider nonlinear electrodynamics inM D+1 with ac- tion W= Z dD+1X L(E) + Z dD+1XJ aAa, E 2 =− 1 2 FabF ab

Denote R2 = DX a=1 X 2 a, V=T+R, K a =V ,a .(17) Then on the equatorial hyperplane Π the metricdS 2 0 co- incides with (13) and one has R Π =r, V Π =v, K A Π =k A.(18) Here Π denotes restriction to Π. Consider nonlinear electrodynamics inM D+1 with ac- tion W= Z dD+1X L(E) + Z dD+1XJ aAa, E 2 =− 1 2 FabF ab. (19) 2 Let us emphasize that this electromagnet...

work page

[4] [2]

Some algebraically degenerate solutions of einstein’s gravitational field equations,

R. P. Kerr and A. Schild, “Some algebraically degenerate solutions of einstein’s gravitational field equations,” in Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, Vol. 17 (American Mathematical Society, 1965) pp. 199–209

work page 1965

[5] [3]

The Kerr spacetime: A Brief introduction,

M. Visser, “The Kerr spacetime: A Brief introduction,” inKerr Fest: Black Holes in Astrophysics, General Rela- tivity and Quantum Gravity(2007) arXiv:0706.0622 [gr- qc]

arXiv 2007

[6] [4]

Black holes and the double copy,

R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, “Black holes and the double copy,” Journal of High Energy Physics2014(2014), 10.1007/jhep12(2014)056

doi:10.1007/jhep12(2014)056 2014

[7] [5]

The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime,

A. Luna, R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White, “The classical double copy for Taub–NUT spacetime,” Physics Letters B750, 272 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [6]

The double copy: gravity from gluons,

C. D. White, “The double copy: gravity from gluons,” Contemporary Physics59, 109 (2018)

work page 2018