Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Spatially resolved elastic strain and lattice rotation at threading dislocations in HgCdTe/CdZnTe epilayers by dark-field X-ray microscopy

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dark-field X-ray microscopy maps the elastic strain and lattice rotation of individual threading dislocations in a HgCdTe/CdZnTe epilayer.

desk verdict Real first maps of individual dislocation strain and rotation in MCT/CZT, but the quantitative strain lobes need a noise floor before they are convincing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.09841 v1 pith:35DWZEJI submitted 2026-08-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.app-ph

C. Yildirim , A. Benhadjira , P. Ballet , T. N. Tran Caliste , J. Baruchel , C. Detlefs , D. Brellier , M. P. Kabukcuoglu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.app-ph
keywords dark-fieldX-raymicroscopythreadingdislocationsHgCdTe/CdZnTeelasticstrainmappinglatticerotationkernelaveragemisorientationinfrareddetectormaterials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks to establish that dark-field X-ray microscopy can separate, for individual threading dislocations in a HgCdTe/CdZnTe epilayer, the elastic strain they carry from the lattice rotation they cause, a separation that single rocking-curve topography cannot make. Working with a 7-micrometre-thick (111) epilayer in reflection geometry, the authors produce maps in which each dislocation shows compact axial-strain lobes of roughly $\pm(4\text{ to }5)\times10^{-5}$ within a few micrometres of the core and a lattice-rotation field extending over tens of micrometres. They also show that weak-beam images on the two flanks of the rocking curve, subtracted from one another, separate dot-like substrate threading dislocations from the elongated in-plane island defects they nucleate in the layer. This matters because these dislocations set the minority-carrier lifetime and dark-current floor of mid-wave infrared focal-plane arrays, so knowing where strain actually sits is a step toward controlling it.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is dark-field X-ray microscopy (DFXM): an X-ray objective lens placed in the diffracted beam forms a magnified image of the illuminated volume and acts as a pinhole in reciprocal space. In this geometry, a rocking scan in the sample angle $\phi$ at fixed $2\theta$ maps lattice rotation, while a scan in $2\theta$ at fixed $\phi$ maps axial strain, and the first moments of the two scans give the $\epsilon_{33}$ and tilt maps. The paper's additional step is to record weak-beam images on the two flanks of the convolved layer-plus-substrate rocking curve and take their difference, so that substrate-originated dots and epilayer island features appear with opposite or same sign in a single frame. Kernel average misorientation (KAM), a local magnitude of the lattice-orientation gradient, then turns each dislocation into a prong pair whose separation is read through the geometric projection $t\cos\theta_B\approx t$ for a near-normal line.

What would settle it

Re-measure the same dislocation field with a different Bragg reflection or with the sample rotated azimuthally, and check whether the KAM prong separation scales as $t\cos\theta_B$ using the actually measured diffraction angle; if the separation stays constant or scales differently, the thickness interpretation collapses. A direct cross-check is to compare DFXM prong positions with atomic-force-microscopy step distortions at the surface and with a cross-sectional transmission electron micrograph of the same dislocation line.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a threading dislocation crossing a 7-micrometre HgCdTe epilayer leaves a compact, alternating-sign axial-strain signature within about 5 micrometres of its core and a long-range lattice-rotation field roughly an order of magnitude larger in angular spread, and that both can be imaged in one reflection-geometry dark-field X-ray microscopy measurement. By scanning the sample angle at fixed diffraction angle and the diffraction angle at fixed sample angle, the authors separate lattice rotation from axial strain and reconstruct $\epsilon_{33}$ and tilt maps. The kernel average misorientation maps resolve each dislocation as a pair of prongs separated by about 7 micrometres, which they identify with the dislocation crossing the full film, one prong at the buried interface and one at the free surface. The measured strain amplitudes agree with a $\tfrac{1}{2}\langle110\rangle$ glide dislocation estimate, and the lobe polarity is linked to the Burgers vector and the mixed edge-screw character of the line. The authors present this as the first mapping of individual dislocation strain and rotation fields in the MCT/CZT system.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the geometric identification of the two KAM prongs with a single dislocation crossing the whole film: it assumes a near-normal dislocation line of length equal to the 7-micrometre layer thickness projects to a prong separation of $t\cos\theta_B$, and the paper applies this with $\theta_B\approx8.8^\circ$ even though the stated diffraction geometry gives $\theta_B\approx5.6^\circ$, so if that projection is wrong, the reading of each prong pair as surface and interface intersections falls.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Each threading dislocation's electrically active footprint is set by its strain field, which reaches micrometres to tens of micrometres, rather than by the nanometre-scale core alone, so local band-gap fluctuations from the measured strain may act as recombination and trapping sites.
  • The 7-micrometre prong separation and its narrow lognormal spread show that KAM maps give a direct, geometry-controlled readout of epilayer thickness at each dislocation.
  • Weak-beam difference imaging separates substrate threading dislocations from epilayer nucleation features in one frame, removing the need to compare separately reconstructed maps to see correlated defects.
  • Tilt domains spanning 50 to 100 micrometres, comparable to a focal-plane pixel, imply that a single dislocation network can produce pixel-to-pixel non-uniformity in responsivity and dark current.
  • Because strain and tilt are decoupled, the edge-like versus screw-like character of each dislocation can be partitioned and connected to spiral-growth handedness and to the bending of dislocations into in-plane misfit segments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The image-depth interpretation can be tested without destroying the sample: re-imaging the same region with a different Bragg reflection, or after azimuthal rotation, should shift the KAM prong separation according to $t\cos\theta_B$; if the separation is invariant or scales differently, the surface/interface assignment would need revision.
  • The alternating-sign multipolar strain pattern around each core suggests a route to infer the local Burgers vector orientation and its depth-dependent edge-screw mix from DFXM maps alone, which the authors do not develop quantitatively.
  • The weak-beam difference scheme should transfer to other lattice-mismatched II-VI heterostructures and to device-grade arrays, giving a fast non-destructive screen for strain hot spots before detector processing.
  • Connecting these single-dislocation strain maps to dark-current or lifetime maps on the same wafer would test the implicit claim that the strain field, not the core, sets the electrically active defect footprint.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports dark-field X-ray microscopy (DFXM) measurements in reflection geometry on a 7 µm HgCdTe/CdZnTe epilayer, claiming the first maps of individual threading-dislocation strain fields in this material system. The central claims are: (i) weak-beam difference images separate substrate-originated dislocation dots from elongated epilayer island features; (ii) kernel average misorientation (KAM) resolves each threading dislocation as a pair of prongs separated by ~7 µm, equal to the layer thickness and interpreted as the interface-emergence and surface-termination intersections of a single inclined line; (iii) axial strain lobes of approximately ±(4–5)×10⁻⁵ are localized within a few micrometres of dislocation cores; and (iv) strain and tilt are decoupled, with long-range tilt fields extending tens of micrometres. The analysis uses standard DFXM first-moment decomposition and compares against dislocation-theory estimates.

Significance. If the strain-lobe and KAM results hold, the paper would provide a valuable non-destructive, spatially resolved view of dislocation strain and rotation in an industrially relevant infrared-detector heterostructure. The manuscript has notable strengths: the KAM statistics are based on 39 dislocation pairs, the density estimate is compared with external etch-pit and near-field topograph values, and the interpretation is anchored in standard dislocation theory rather than a free-parameter fit. The weak-beam difference imaging idea is a genuinely useful experimental development. However, the central quantitative strain claim is not yet convincingly separated from the reported background variability, which is a load-bearing issue for the paper's main advance of strain–tilt decoupling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Fig. 5(a) and the paragraph beginning 'To examine the associated strain fields'] The reported axial-strain lobes of ±(4–5)×10⁻⁵ are within the stated matrix background of approximately ±0.5×10⁻⁴ (i.e., ±5×10⁻⁵) in the same map. No noise floor, standard deviation, or confidence interval is given for the ε33 first-moment reconstruction, so the localized lobes are not demonstrably distinguishable from background variability. This is load-bearing because the claim of strain–tilt decoupling and the 'first maps of strain around individual TDs' rest on these lobes being real signal rather than noise or a rocking-curve convolution artifact (which the paper itself invokes to explain the wavy tilt background). The authors should quantify the noise in ε33 (e.g., from flat regions or repeated scans), show that the lobe amplitudes exceed it with statistical significance, or present a quantitative comparison with simulation that includes a background model.
  2. [Supplementary material (Nye-tensor analysis and dislocation-contrast simulations)] The manuscript states that 'dislocation-contrast simulations for the three g-visible 1/2<110> variants reproduce the observed behaviour' and that 'the partition between edge-like and screw-like character is independently recovered from the Nye tensor components', but these analyses are only mentioned in a short paragraph and are not checkable from the preprint because the supplementary material is not provided. Since the alternating-sign multipolar strain pattern is atypical for a simple end-on edge dislocation, these simulations and Nye-tensor maps are essential verification. At minimum, a representative simulated strain map and a Nye-tensor map for one or two dislocations should be included in the main text or the supplementary material made available for review.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Experimental section, 'Measurements'] The text reports 2θ = 11.21° (implying θ_B ≈ 5.6°), but in the KAM geometry argument it uses θ_B ≈ 8.8°. Although both values give t cos θ_B ≈ 7 µm for t = 7 µm, this inconsistency should be reconciled by stating the correct Bragg angle and using it consistently throughout.
  2. [Fig. 2 description] The sentence 'The dot-like and wavy line-like features that were unresolved in the millimetre-scale topographs of Ref. 20.' is an incomplete sentence; it should be revised to describe what is now resolved.
  3. [Conclusion] The opening sentence of the conclusion is incomplete: 'we show that the elastic strain and lattice-rotation fields of individual TDs in an LPE-grown Hg1−xCdxTe epilayer.' It needs a verb such as 'are mapped' or 'are resolved'. The same paragraph also contains the awkward phrase 'an order of magnitude larger in angle', which should be clarified.
  4. [Fig. 4 statistics paragraph] The text says the inner-edge opening median is 7.10 µm with σ_ln = 0.10, 'fixed at the 7µm epilayer thickness'. The wording is confusing: if the median is a fit parameter, it is not fixed at 7 µm; if it is fixed, the reported median of 7.10 µm is redundant. Please clarify whether the median was constrained to the thickness or fitted.
  5. [General notation] Equation (1) uses Δd/d for the axial strain, while later text and figures use ε33. Define the equivalence explicitly to avoid ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central strain/rotation maps are direct DFXM measurements, checked against prior independent sample characterization and standard dislocation theory, not derived from the claims they support.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental map of elastic strain and lattice rotation at individual threading dislocations, obtained directly from first moments of rocking scans; no quantity asserted as a prediction is defined in terms of the data it is supposed to explain. The only backward citations (notably Ref. 20) supply sample identity, the previously measured lattice mismatch Δd/d = 1.2×10^-4, and independent etch-pit/AFM/near-field density estimates; these are inputs or external benchmarks, and the TD density comparison (1.73×10^4 cm^-2 vs. 10^3–10^4 cm^-2 from Ref. 20) is a consistency check rather than a fit. The KAM prong separation is compared with the independently known 7 µm layer thickness using a geometric projection formula; the θ_B discrepancy between the experimental 2θ = 11.21° and the θ_B ≈ 8.8° used in the text changes t cosθ_B by less than 1%, so it does not affect the load-bearing argument. The strain amplitude comparison uses the standard elastic formula u ~ b/(2πr) as an order-of-magnitude benchmark, not as a fitted input. The Nye-tensor partition is derived from the same measured maps but used only as a consistency check. No equation in the paper reduces a predicted quantity to a fitted parameter or to a self-citation. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced. The paper relies on standard elasticity theory, the established DFXM reconstruction method, and specific experimental assumptions about absorption and rocking-curve convolution. The free parameters are descriptive statistics of the measured distributions, not fitted inputs to a derivation.

free parameters (3)
  • lognormal median for inner-edge opening = 7.10 µm
    Median of the measured prong separations; interpreted as the known 7 µm epilayer thickness. Descriptive statistic, not used in a derivation.
  • lognormal sigma_ln for inner-edge opening = 0.10
    Fitted width of the measured distribution; descriptive, not load-bearing for the central claim.
  • lognormal sigma_ln for prong length = 0.36
    Fitted width of the measured prong length distribution; descriptive, reflects variable in-plane excursion.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Isotropic elastic dislocation strain field u ~ b/(2*pi*r) (Hirth and Lothe)
    Used to estimate the expected axial strain magnitude near a 1/2<110> glide dislocation.
  • domain assumption DFXM first-moment decomposition maps strain and tilt from (phi, 2theta) scans
    Reconstruction of epsilon_33 and tilt maps relies on the standard DFXM analysis method (Refs. 12, 25).
  • domain assumption The signal is layer-dominated due to absorption, and the substrate contributes a weak but coherent imprint
    The interpretation of the difference maps and the wavy background in the phi_COM map depends on this convolution model.
  • domain assumption The prong separation in KAM maps equals t*cos(theta_B) for a near-normal dislocation line
    Used to identify the 7 micrometer prong separation as the epilayer thickness; the stated theta_B is inconsistent (8.8 degrees vs. 5.6 degrees).
  • domain assumption Dislocation-templated growth model: substrate TD offers a growth ledge and nucleates an MCT pyramid
    The interpretation of the island-like features and the correlation with substrate dots relies on this model from Ref. 20.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatially resolved elastic strain and lattice rotation at threading dislocations in HgCdTe/CdZnTe epilayers by dark-field X-ray microscopy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/35DWZEJI

@misc{pith2026260809841,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatially resolved elastic strain and lattice rotation at threading dislocations in HgCdTe/CdZnTe epilayers by dark-field X-ray microscopy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/35DWZEJI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.09841}
}
abstract

Threading dislocations (TDs) propagating from a Cd$_{1-y}$Zn$_{y}$Te (CZT) substrate into a liquid-phase-epitaxy Hg$_{1-x}$Cd$_{x}$Te (MCT) epilayer set the minority-carrier lifetime and dark-current floor of mid-wave infrared focal-plane arrays, yet at device-grade densities their local strain fields have been accessible only through topography, which conflates lattice tilt and elastic strain. We apply dark-field X-ray microscopy in reflection geometry to a \SI{7}{\micro\metre}-thick (111) MCT/CZT epilayer. Shallow Bragg angle and absorption makes the signal layer dominated while the numerical aperture of the objective keeps the layer and substrate rocking curves convolved, so weak-beam images on either side of the rocking curve and their difference image the correlated defects in a single frame: dot-like substrate TDs and the elongated, in-plane island features they nucleate in the layer. Kernel average misorientation resolves each TD as a \SI{7}{\micro\metre} signature, the layer thickness, alongside axial strain lobes of $\pm(4$ to $5)\times10^{-5}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.09841 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. DFXM in reflection geometry on the MCT/CZT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Lattice rotation around individual threading dislocations imaged with the 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Multiscale kernel average misorientation (KAM) of the threading dislocations. Top: KAM map at 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Statistics of the dislocation signatures in the 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Axial-strain map [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Rogalski , title =

    A. Rogalski , title =. Reports on Progress in Physics , volume =

    work page

  2. [2]

    Lei and J

    W. Lei and J. Antoszewski and L. Faraone , title =. Applied Physics Reviews , volume =

    work page

  3. [3]

    R. J. Kamaladasa and F. Liu and L. M. Porter and R. F. Davis and D. D. Koleske and G. Mulholland and K. A. Jones and Y. N. Picard , title =. Journal of Microscopy , volume =

    work page

  4. [4]

    S. M. Johnson and D. R. Rhiger and J. P. Rosbeck and J. M. Peterson and S. M. Taylor and M. E. Boyd , title =. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    work page 1992

  5. [5]

    S. H. Shin and J. M. Arias and M. Zandian and J. G. Pasko and R. E. DeWames , title =. Applied Physics Letters , volume =

    work page

  6. [6]

    npj Computational Materials , year=

    Deep learning-assisted weak beam identification in Dark-field X-ray microscopy , author=. npj Computational Materials , year=

    work page

  7. [7]

    S. P. Tobin and F. T. J. Smith and P. W. Norton and J. Wu and M. Dudley and D. Di Marzio and L. G. Casagrande , title =. Journal of Electronic Materials , volume =. 1995 , doi =

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    W. J. Everson and C. K. Ard and J. L. Sepich and B. E. Dean and G. T. Neugebauer and H. F. Schaake , title =. Journal of Electronic Materials , volume =

    work page

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    I. H. New defect etchants for. Journal of Crystal Growth , volume =

  2. [10]

    Fourreau and K

    Y. Fourreau and K. Pantzas and G. Patriarche and V. Destefanis , title =. Journal of Electronic Materials , volume =

  3. [11]

    J. E. Ayers , title =. Journal of Crystal Growth , volume =

  4. [12]

    D. L. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B , volume =

  5. [13]

    Tran Thi, T. N. and J. Morse and D. Caliste and B. Fernandez and D. Eon and J. H. Journal of Applied Crystallography , volume =

  6. [14]

    V. M. Kaganer and O. Brandt and A. Trampert and K. H. Ploog , title =. Physical Review B , volume =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  7. [15]

    Simons and A

    H. Simons and A. King and W. Ludwig and C. Detlefs and W. Pantleon and S. Schmidt and F. St. Nature Communications , volume =. 2015 , doi =

    2015

  8. [16]

    H. F. Poulsen and A. C. Jakobsen and H. Simons and S. R. Ahl and P. K. Cook and C. Detlefs , title =. Journal of Applied Crystallography , volume =. 2017 , doi =

    2017

  9. [17]

    H. F. Poulsen and P. K. Cook and H. Leemreize and A. F. Pedersen and C. Yildirim and M. Kutsal and A. C. Jakobsen and J. X. Trujillo and J. Ormstrup and C. Detlefs , title =. Journal of Applied Crystallography , volume =. 2018 , doi =

    2018

  10. [18]

    MRS Bulletin , volume =

    Can Yildirim and Phil Cook and Carsten Detlefs and Hugh Simons and Henning Friis Poulsen , title =. MRS Bulletin , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  11. [19]

    Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , volume =

    J. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  12. [20]

    A. C. Jakobsen and H. Simons and W. Ludwig and C. Yildirim and H. Leemreize and L. Porz and C. Detlefs and H. F. Poulsen , title =. Journal of Applied Crystallography , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  13. [21]

    Nano Letters , volume =

    Hugh Simons and Anders Clemen Jakobsen and Sonja Rosenlund Ahl and Henning Friis Poulsen and Wolfgang Pantleon and Ying-Hao Chu and Carsten Detlefs and Nagarajan Valanoor , title =. Nano Letters , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  14. [22]

    Poulsen and Grethe Winther and Carsten Detlefs and Pin H

    Can Yildirim and Henning F. Poulsen and Grethe Winther and Carsten Detlefs and Pin H. Huang and Leora E. Dresselhaus-Marais , title =. Scientific Reports , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  15. [23]

    Dresselhaus-Marais and Grethe Winther and Marylesa Howard and Arnulfo Gonzalez and Sean R

    Leora E. Dresselhaus-Marais and Grethe Winther and Marylesa Howard and Arnulfo Gonzalez and Sean R. Breckling and Can Yildirim and Philip K. Cook and Mustafacan Kutsal and Luis Zepeda-Ruiz and Amit Samanta and Carsten Detlefs and Jon H. Eggert and Hugh Simons and Henning Friis...

    2021

  16. [24]

    Yildirim and D

    C. Yildirim and D. Brellier and Rapha. Acta Materialia , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  17. [25]

    Kutsal and P

    M. Kutsal and P. Bernard and G. Berruyer and P. K. Cook and R. Hino and A. C. Jakobsen and W. Ludwig and J. Ormstrup and T. Roth and H. Simons and K. Smets and J. X. Sierra and J. Wade and P. Wattecamps and C. Yildirim and H. F. Poulsen and C. Detlefs , title =. IOP Conference...

    2019

  18. [26]

    Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , volume =

    Can Yildirim and Philippe Ballet and Jean-Louis Santailler and Dominique Giotta and R. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  19. [27]

    Brellier and E

    D. Brellier and E. Gout and G. Gaude and D. Pelenc and P. Ballet and T. Miguet and M. C. Manzato , title =. Journal of Electronic Materials , volume =

  20. [28]

    Pelliciari , title =

    B. Pelliciari , title =. Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials , volume =

  21. [29]

    F. C. Frank , title =. Discussions of the Faraday Society , volume =

  22. [30]

    John Price Hirth and Jens Lothe , title =

  23. [31]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    The ESRF dark-field x-ray microscope at ID03 , author=. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=. 2025 , organization=

    2025

  24. [32]

    A finite difference scheme for integrating the Takagi–Taupin equations on an arbitrary orthogonal grid , volume =

    Carlsen, Mads and Simons, Hugh , year =. A finite difference scheme for integrating the Takagi–Taupin equations on an arbitrary orthogonal grid , volume =. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances , publisher =. doi:10.1107/s2053273322004934 , number =

    doi

  25. [33]

    Simulating dark-field X-ray microscopy images with wavefront propagation techniques , volume =

    Carlsen, Mads and Detlefs, Carsten and Yildirim, Can and Raeder, Trygve and Simons, Hugh , year =. Simulating dark-field X-ray microscopy images with wavefront propagation techniques , volume =. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances , publisher =. doi:10.11...

    doi

  26. [34]

    Rogalski ,\ @noop journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 68 ,\ pages 2267 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    author author A. Rogalski ,\ @noop journal journal Reports on Progress in Physics \ volume 68 ,\ pages 2267 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005

  27. [35]

    Lei , author J

    author author W. Lei , author J. Antoszewski ,\ and\ author L. Faraone ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 2 ,\ pages 041303 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  28. [36]

    author author S. M. \ Johnson , author D. R. \ Rhiger , author J. P. \ Rosbeck , author J. M. \ Peterson , author S. M. \ Taylor ,\ and\ author M. E. \ Boyd ,\ https://doi.org/10.1116/1.586278 journal journal Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B \ volume 10 ,\ pages 1499 (...

    doi

  29. [37]

    author author S. H. \ Shin , author J. M. \ Arias , author M. Zandian , author J. G. \ Pasko ,\ and\ author R. E. \ DeWames ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 61 ,\ pages 829 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  30. [38]

    Brellier , author E

    author author D. Brellier , author E. Gout , author G. Gaude , author D. Pelenc , author P. Ballet , author T. Miguet ,\ and\ author M. C. \ Manzato ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Electronic Materials \ volume 43 ,\ pages 2901 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  31. [39]

    author author W. J. \ Everson , author C. K. \ Ard , author J. L. \ Sepich , author B. E. \ Dean , author G. T. \ Neugebauer ,\ and\ author H. F. \ Schaake ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Electronic Materials \ volume 24 ,\ pages 505 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  32. [40]

    H \"a hnert \ and\ author M

    author author I. H \"a hnert \ and\ author M. Schenk ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Crystal Growth \ volume 101 ,\ pages 251 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990

  33. [41]

    Fourreau , author K

    author author Y. Fourreau , author K. Pantzas , author G. Patriarche ,\ and\ author V. Destefanis ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Electronic Materials \ volume 45 ,\ pages 4518 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016

  34. [42]

    u bbert , author T. Baumbach , author J. H \

    author author D. L \"u bbert , author T. Baumbach , author J. H \"a rtwig , author E. Boller ,\ and\ author E. Pernot ,\ @noop journal journal Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B \ volume 160 ,\ pages 521 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  35. [43]

    author author T. N. \ Tran Thi , author J. Morse , author D. Caliste , author B. Fernandez , author D. Eon , author J. H \"a rtwig , author C. Barbay , author C. Mer-Calfati , author N. Tranchant , author J. C. \ Arnault , author T. A. \ Lafford ,\ and\ author J. Baruchel ,\ @...

    2017

  36. [44]

    Simons , author A

    author author H. Simons , author A. King , author W. Ludwig , author C. Detlefs , author W. Pantleon , author S. Schmidt , author F. St \"o hr , author I. Snigireva , author A. Snigirev ,\ and\ author H. F. \ Poulsen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7098 journal journal Nature...

    doi

  37. [45]

    author author H. F. \ Poulsen , author A. C. \ Jakobsen , author H. Simons , author S. R. \ Ahl , author P. K. \ Cook ,\ and\ author C. Detlefs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576717011037 journal journal Journal of Applied Crystallography \ volume 50 ,\ pages 1441 ( year 2017...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Yildirim , author P

    author author C. Yildirim , author P. Cook , author C. Detlefs , author H. Simons ,\ and\ author H. F. \ Poulsen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2020.89 journal journal MRS Bulletin \ volume 45 ,\ pages 277 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    author author H. F. \ Poulsen , author P. K. \ Cook , author H. Leemreize , author A. F. \ Pedersen , author C. Yildirim , author M. Kutsal , author A. C. \ Jakobsen , author J. X. \ Trujillo , author J. Ormstrup ,\ and\ author C. Detlefs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718...

    doi

  40. [48]

    Simons , author A

    author author H. Simons , author A. C. \ Jakobsen , author S. R. \ Ahl , author H. F. \ Poulsen , author W. Pantleon , author Y.-H. \ Chu , author C. Detlefs ,\ and\ author N. Valanoor ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b03839 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 19 ,\ ...

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author A. C. \ Jakobsen , author H. Simons , author W. Ludwig , author C. Yildirim , author H. Leemreize , author L. Porz , author C. Detlefs ,\ and\ author H. F. \ Poulsen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576718017302 journal journal Journal of Applied Crystallography \...

    doi

  42. [50]

    Yildirim , author H

    author author C. Yildirim , author H. F. \ Poulsen , author G. Winther , author C. Detlefs , author P. H. \ Huang ,\ and\ author L. E. \ Dresselhaus-Marais ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30767-w journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 13 ,\ pages 3834 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  43. [51]

    author author L. E. \ Dresselhaus-Marais , author G. Winther , author M. Howard , author A. Gonzalez , author S. R. \ Breckling , author C. Yildirim , author P. K. \ Cook , author M. Kutsal , author L. Zepeda-Ruiz , author A. Samanta , author C. Detlefs , author J. H. \ Eggert...

    doi

  44. [52]

    Yildirim , author D

    author author C. Yildirim , author D. Brellier , author R. Pesci , author F. Boulard , author N. Baier , author T. Zhou , author T. Nguyen-Thanh , author P. Gergaud , author T. Schulli ,\ and\ author P. Ballet ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117290 journal journal Ac...

  45. [53]

    Yildirim , author P

    author author C. Yildirim , author P. Ballet , author J.-L. \ Santailler , author D. Giotta , author R. Obrecht , author T. N. T. \ Thi , author J. Baruchel ,\ and\ author D. Brellier ,\ https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577520014149 journal journal Journal of Synchrotron Radiation...

    doi

  46. [54]

    Isern , author T

    author author H. Isern , author T. Brochard , author T. Dufrane , author P. Brumund , author E. Papillon , author D. Scortani , author R. Hino , author C. Yildirim , author R. R. \ Lamas , author Y. Li , et al. ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Journal of Physics: Conference Series ,\ Vo...

    2025

  47. [55]

    Kutsal , author P

    author author M. Kutsal , author P. Bernard , author G. Berruyer , author P. K. \ Cook , author R. Hino , author A. C. \ Jakobsen , author W. Ludwig , author J. Ormstrup , author T. Roth , author H. Simons , author K. Smets , author J. X. \ Sierra , author J. Wade , author P. ...

    doi

  48. [56]

    Pelliciari ,\ @noop journal journal Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials \ volume 29 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    author author B. Pelliciari ,\ @noop journal journal Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials \ volume 29 ,\ pages 1 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  49. [57]

    author author S. P. \ Tobin , author F. T. J. \ Smith , author P. W. \ Norton , author J. Wu , author M. Dudley , author D. D. \ Marzio ,\ and\ author L. G. \ Casagrande ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02653073 journal journal Journal of Electronic Materials \ volume 24 ,\ pages ...

    doi

  50. [58]

    author author J. G. \ Ferrer , author R. Rodr \'i guez-Lamas , author H. Payno , author W. D. \ Nolf , author P. Cook , author V. A. S. \ Jover , author C. Yildirim ,\ and\ author C. Detlefs ,\ https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600577523001674 journal journal Journal of Synchrotron Ra...

    doi

  51. [59]

    author author J. P. \ Hirth \ and\ author J. Lothe ,\ @noop title Theory of Dislocations ,\ edition 2nd \ ed.\ ( publisher Krieger Publishing Company ,\ year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992

  52. [60]

    author author V. M. \ Kaganer , author O. Brandt , author A. Trampert ,\ and\ author K. H. \ Ploog ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045423 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 72 ,\ pages 045423 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  53. [61]

    author author R. J. \ Kamaladasa , author F. Liu , author L. M. \ Porter , author R. F. \ Davis , author D. D. \ Koleske , author G. Mulholland , author K. A. \ Jones ,\ and\ author Y. N. \ Picard ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Microscopy \ volume 244 ,\ pages 273 ( year ...

    2011

  54. [62]

    author author F. C. \ Frank ,\ @noop journal journal Discussions of the Faraday Society \ volume 5 ,\ pages 48 ( year 1949 ) NoStop

    1949

  55. [63]

    Qu \'e r \'e ,\ @noop title Physics of Materials \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    author author Y. Qu \'e r \'e ,\ @noop title Physics of Materials \ ( publisher CRC Press ,\ year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998

  56. [64]

    Benhadjira , author C

    author author A. Benhadjira , author C. Detlefs , author S. Borgi , author V. Favre-Nicolin ,\ and\ author C. Yildirim ,\ @noop journal journal npj Computational Materials \ ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    2026

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.