Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Eliminating photon transport in long-baseline optical interferometry using quantum memories

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Quantum memories can replace photon transport and full-range optical delay lines, making multi-kilometer optical baselines plausible.

desk verdict A conceptually valuable roadmap whose quantitative core is currently unsound: Eq. (8) is unphysical as written, so Figure 1 and Table 1 rest on invalid footing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10078 v1 pith:VMQGMXDY submitted 2026-08-10 quant-ph astro-ph.IM

Yousef K. Chahine , Chaohan Cui , William DeRocco , Daniel Gottesman , Saikat Guha , Emil T. Khabiboulline , Zhenning Liu , Brittany McClinton
show 6 more authors
Jayadev Rajagopal Fredrik Rantakyro J. Gabriel Richardson Stephen Ridgway Aqil Sajjad Joohyung Song
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phastro-ph.IM
keywords long-baselineopticalinterferometryquantummemoryentanglement-assistedmeasurementdelaylinetime-binsynchronizationphasestabilityphotoncaptureefficiencyheterodyne
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that quantum memories can remove the two hardest engineering bottlenecks that cap classical optical interferometry at baselines of roughly 300 meters: transporting starlight to a central beam combiner and maintaining a continuously variable optical delay line to sub-wavelength precision. In the proposed architecture each telescope maps the incoming stellar coherence locally into a temporally gated quantum memory, and shared entangled pairs are used to identify which arrival-time bin held the photon without revealing which telescope received it. The authors derive closed-form results for photon capture efficiency and recovered complex visibility as functions of the ratio between photon coherence time and memory exposure window, and of the time-bin synchronization error. Their central conclusion is that timing and phase stability requirements decouple: timing is set by coherence-envelope overlap at the roughly $10^{-11}$ s scale, while phase fidelity is set by local-oscillator stability at about $4\times10^{-11}$ fractional frequency, so multi-kilometer baselines become an engineering question rather than a fundamental barrier.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a temporal mode-overlap calculation. The gated atom-cavity memory is treated as accepting light only from a back-propagated time-frequency mode modeled as a square-wave packet of width $t_w$, matched to the gate interval; the authors state this mode is optimal in that any other eigenmode would yield strictly smaller overlap with an incident field gated within the exposure window, analogous to an Airy-mode fiber for a hard aperture. Capture is then the overlap between that memory mode and the exponentially decaying single-photon wave packet of the spectrally filtered stellar field, which yields the capture-efficiency formula and the visibility envelope factor $f(\tau)/f(0)$. Around this calculation sit the protocol elements that make it an interferometer: local phase reference from ancillary modes during loading, Bell-pair-assisted nonlocal time-of-arrival measurement to fix which time bins to correlate, and phase gates on the stored memories to correct known geometric delay.

What would settle it

Measure the capture probability of a calibrated weak-coherent or single-photon pulse with exponentially decaying envelope into a real gated quantum memory while scanning the pulse arrival time relative to the gate, and compare with Eq (5) as $t_c/t_w$ is varied; a systematic disagreement would falsify the square-wave mode model. In a two-node memory-assisted interferometer, the same check can be done through visibility: measure $|V|$ as a function of time-bin synchronization error and test whether it follows $f(\tau)/f(0)$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that quantum-memory interferometry replaces physical photon transport and full-range optical delay lines with memory loading, time-bin association, quantum gates, and delayed readout, transforming the stability requirements rather than the underlying interferometric problem. For a spectrally filtered stellar photon of coherence time $t_c$ loaded into memory exposure windows of width $t_w$, the capture probability is $$P(\text{capture}) = p_1 \frac{2t_c}{t_w}\left[1-\frac{t_c}{t_w}\left(1-$e^{{-t_w/t_c}}$\right)\right],$$ and the complex visibility in the presence of a time-bin synchronization error $\tau$ is $$V(\tau)=e^{i\omega_0\$\Delta$ t}\,$e^{{i(\theta_{\mathrm{LO}}$,B}-\theta_{\mathrm{LO},A})}\,\frac{f(\tau)}{f(0)},$$ with $f$ an envelope-overlap factor. Because the coherence envelope is matched at the scale of $t_c$ and $t_w$ while the optical phase is referenced to the local oscillators used during loading, the two requirements separate; this is the same separation that makes heterodyne interferometry viable, except that the measurement remains photon-counting, so signal-to-noise scales as $\sqrt{\epsilon}$ rather than $\epsilon$ for photon occupancy $\epsilon$. The paper concludes that if memory bandwidth, storage time, loading efficiency, phase stability, and entanglement rates reach the values in its requirements table, the architecture is a plausible route toward optical baselines far beyond classical beam transport.

Load-bearing premise

The computed efficiency and visibility numbers depend on modeling the memory's back-propagated temporal mode as a square-wave packet matched to the gate interval, with the assertion that this shape is optimal; if a real memory accepts a different temporal mode, Eqs (5) and (8), and the requirements derived from them, change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the decoupling holds, baseline length no longer forces kilometer-scale optical delay lines or evacuated beam paths, because astronomical photons never travel between sites.
  • Timing precision requirements fall to about one-tenth of the coherence time, roughly $10^{-11}$ s for a 10 GHz channel, instead of sub-wavelength optical path control, while local-oscillator frequency stability near $\Delta\nu/\nu\sim4\times10^{-11}$ carries the phase budget.
  • Deterministic geometric delay can be corrected digitally by shifting time bins and applying phase gates on the memories, replacing classical moving delay lines.
  • Laboratory demonstrations of the full sequence exist: a two-node quantum-network interferometry run with a fiber baseline up to 1.55 km, and an atomic-ensemble experiment with a 20 km equivalent fiber baseline that compensated geometric delay by delaying memory readout.
  • Collective multi-telescope measurements become distributed quantum computing tasks, potentially reaching quantum limits of imaging rather than relying only on pairwise telescope combinations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the architecture scales, the dominant cost and difficulty moves from optics and terrain to quantum-network rate: the required entanglement distribution rate, about 200 kHz per band, and memory coherence time, about $10^{-3}$ s, become the figures that decide whether kilometer baselines are practical.
  • The analysis suggests a sharp trade-off: underfilled memory windows ($t_w\ll t_c$) approach unit capture efficiency but consume more memories, while overfilled windows use memory bandwidth efficiently but throw away photons; an optimal array would likely multiplex many narrow spectral channels rather than seek one wideband memory.
  • A direct measurement of a real memory's accepted temporal mode would test the square-wave optimality assumption; if real modes differ, the matched-bandwidth bound of $2/e$ changes and may favor actively shaping stellar photon wave packets before loading.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript proposes that quantum-memory-based interferometry can eliminate the need for physical transport of stellar photons and for full-range optical delay lines in long-baseline optical interferometry. The authors describe the operating principles inherited from prior proposals (Gottesman et al. 2012; Khabiboulline et al. 2019), give formulas for photon capture probability and interferometric visibility as functions of memory gate width and timing synchronization error, present a requirements table for a 10-km-baseline system under fiducial assumptions, and review recent laboratory demonstrations by Stas et al. and Wang et al. The central claim is that the quantum architecture decouples coherence-envelope timing requirements from optical-phase stability requirements.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the work is significant: it identifies a concrete route to multi-kilometer optical baselines by replacing optical delay lines and beam transport with memory loading, time-bin association, and quantum gates, and it connects the protocol to demonstrated hardware. The paper is commendable for grounding the discussion in two recent memory-assisted interferometry experiments and for framing realistic technology gaps such as memory bandwidth, storage time, and phase-locked local oscillators. However, the quantitative core of Section 3—the capture-efficiency and visibility formulas and the resulting requirements table—is not currently usable, because the visibility envelope function is internally inconsistent as printed.

major comments (4)
  1. [3.3, Eq. (8)] The visibility envelope function f(τ) as printed is unphysical, and this invalidates the central quantitative results of Section 3. In the matched case t_w=t_c, evaluating at τ=0 gives a bracket proportional to e^{-1} - 1 + 1 - sinh(1) = e^{-1} - sinh(1) ≈ -0.807, so f(0)<0. More seriously, for 0<τ<t_w the bracketed expression changes sign (for example, with t_w=t_c the ratio f(τ)/f(0) is positive near τ=0.5 t_w but negative near τ=0.8 t_w), and for τ>t_w the term e^{-t_w/t_c} cosh(τ/t_c) - e^{-τ/t_c} grows exponentially, so |f(τ)/f(0)| exceeds 1. A capture-overlap factor cannot be negative, change sign in this manner, or grow without bound. Because Eq. (7), Figure 1, and the 'Timing precision ~10^-11 s' and '~80% instrumental visibility' rows of Table 1 all derive from f(τ)/f(0), the quantitative claims of Section 3.3 and the requirements table are not supported as stated.
  2. [3, Eqs. (5), (7), (8)] The manuscript states that these results are 'presented without rigorous derivation, which will be included in a future peer-reviewed publication.' For a paper whose stated purpose is to present fundamental operating mechanisms and a requirements table, this deferral is not adequate: the capture efficiency, the visibility expression, and the timing requirement in Table 1 cannot be checked from the text. The issue is not merely missing rigor; as shown above, Eq. (8) is internally inconsistent. The authors should either provide the derivation in an appendix or clearly mark these results as preliminary and remove or rework the quantitative requirements table.
  3. [3.1] The model treats the back-propagated memory mode as a square-wave packet and asserts that 'any other eigenmode would yield strictly smaller overlap.' This optimality claim is not demonstrated and is not established by the Airy-fiber analogy, since mode-matching optimality depends on the class of allowed incident modes and the optimization criterion. Because this mode-shape assumption directly determines Eqs. (5) and (8), the requirements derived from those equations inherit the uncertainty. Please provide a proof or a reference for the optimality claim, or state it explicitly as an assumption rather than a derived property.
  4. [3.3, Eq. (7)] The formula for V(τ) contains no dependence on per-site capture efficiency or path loss, although the text immediately states that unequal path loss and capture efficiency between sites A and B degrade visibility. For a two-site state with unequal loading probabilities η_A and η_B, the off-diagonal element of the postselected density matrix in Eq. (6) should be scaled by a factor such as sqrt(η_A η_B), depending on the normalization convention. Please include this factor in V or explain the convention under which it is absorbed.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 1] The caption states that Figure 1 shows the maximum visibility, but no figure appears in the manuscript; either include the figure or remove the reference to it.
  2. [Eq. (8)] The positive-part expression [tw - τ]_+/tc is ambiguous and the bracket notation is difficult to parse; please rewrite with unambiguous notation such as [t_w - τ]_+ / t_c.
  3. [Table 1] The table header contains a typo ('V alue' instead of 'Value'), and the 'How arrived at' column would benefit from explicit references to the equation numbers used for each entry.
  4. [5.1] The conclusion that the paper 'confirmed' the alternate path is stronger than the supporting material warrants, since the central equations are explicitly deferred to a future publication; 'argued' or 'shown under the stated assumptions' would be more accurate.
  5. [Reference [14]] Reference 14 is listed without publication details; if it is not yet published, mark it consistently as 'in preparation' or 'unpublished'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; central formulas are explicit modeling assumptions and feasibility is independently demonstrated, with only minor self-citation.

full rationale

The paper does not fit any parameter to a subset of data and then rename it a prediction; Eqs. (5) and (8) are explicitly presented without derivation as the authors' model (Sec. 3). The square-wave memory mode is labeled "a convenient model," not an output of the analysis, so the capture-efficiency and visibility curves are consequences of stated assumptions rather than reductions to the assumptions. The memory-interferometry protocol is attributed to the authors' prior work (refs 2,3; Khabiboulline is a coauthor), and the S/N scaling in Sec. 3.5 is inherited from refs 2,3; however, the manuscript simultaneously cites independent two-node demonstrations (refs 7,9) that implement the same memory-assisted nonlocal phase measurement, so feasibility does not rest solely on a self-citation chain. No uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no known result is merely renamed. The unphysical behavior of Eq. (8) noted in the skeptical review is a correctness risk, not a circularity, since it does not make the conclusion equivalent to its inputs by construction. Overall the derivation chain is self-contained at the level of the stated model; the only circularity-adjacent feature is routine self-citation of the originating protocol, which is not load-bearing.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data. The fiducial values in Table 1 (10 m2 aperture, 10 mag source, 10 GHz bandwidth, 633 nm wavelength, 10 km baseline) are inputs adopted from Khabiboulline et al. (2019), not fitted values. The coherence time tc is set by the spectral filter bandwidth. No new physical entities are introduced; the quantum memory, Bell pairs, and local oscillators are existing devices and resources.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The filtered stellar field is an exponentially-decaying single-photon wave packet with coherence time tc; within a window T the state is an equiprobable mixture of arrival times (Eq 4).
    Section 3.1; used to derive the capture probability and visibility. It approximates a weak thermal source after spectral filtering.
  • ad hoc to paper The quantum memory is a two-level system that couples unitarily to a single time-frequency mode, and the back-propagated mode is a square-wave packet matched to the gate interval.
    Section 3.1; the paper states this is a convenient model and asserts that any other eigenmode yields strictly smaller overlap. This determines Eqs (5) and (8).
  • domain assumption The Khabiboulline et al. (2019) protocol is assumed: pre-shared Bell pairs, CZ gates from memory qubits, and diagonal-basis Bell-pair measurement to identify the arrival time bin without revealing which telescope received the photon.
    Section 3.3; the visibility formula (7) is derived within this protocol, which is taken from prior self-cited work.
  • domain assumption Phase-locked local oscillators at each site with known, stable phase difference over the integration time.
    Section 3.3 and Table 1; the visibility phase depends on the LO phase difference, and the paper lists this as a requirement.
  • standard math Standard quantum optics machinery: entangling optical-memory gates, projective measurements, and feed-forward corrections (e.g., Duan-Kimble cavity interface).
    Section 2.2; standard results are invoked without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Eliminating photon transport in long-baseline optical interferometry using quantum memories." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VMQGMXDY

@misc{pith2026260810078,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Eliminating photon transport in long-baseline optical interferometry using quantum memories},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VMQGMXDY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10078}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we describe the fundamental operating mechanisms of optical interferometry using quantum memory and entanglement. We show how these remove the optical delay line bottleneck. Quantum memory is not without its own set of challenges, some of which include very small bandwidths as well as limitations in storage time. We examine the influence of timing artifacts on memory photon capture probability and interferometric complex visibility. We highlight keystone areas of technology that require further development and are essential to realizing these opportunities, as well as ongoing work to overcome these challenges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10078 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Maximum visibility of two-site interference with time bin synchronization error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Longer-baseline telescopes using quantum repeaters,

    Gottesman, D., Jennewein, T., and Croke, S., “Longer-baseline telescopes using quantum repeaters,”Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 070503 (Aug 2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    Quantum-assisted telescope arrays,

    Khabiboulline, E. T., Borregaard, J., De Greve, K., and Lukin, M. D., “Quantum-assisted telescope arrays,” Physical Review A100, 022316 (Aug. 2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Optical Interferometry with Quantum Networks,

    Khabiboulline, E., Borregaard, J., De Greve, K., and Lukin, M., “Optical Interferometry with Quantum Networks,”Physical Review Letters123, 070504 (Aug. 2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Quantum resolution limit of long-baseline imaging using distributed entanglement,

    Padilla, I., Sajjad, A., Saif, B. N., and Guha, S., “Quantum resolution limit of long-baseline imaging using distributed entanglement,”Phys. Rev. A113(1), 012608 (2026)

    work page 2026

  5. [5]

    Superresolution Imaging with Entanglement-Enhanced Telescopy,

    Padilla, I., Sajjad, A., Saif, B. N., and Guha, S., “Superresolution Imaging with Entanglement-Enhanced Telescopy,”Phys. Rev. Lett.136(1), 010803 (2026)

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    Quantum memories and the double-slit experiment: implications for astronomical interferometry,

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., Sellars, M. J., and Bartholomew, J. G., “Quantum memories and the double-slit experiment: implications for astronomical interferometry,”J. Opt. Soc. Am. B38, A86–A98 (Jul 2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Memory-assisted nonlocal interferometer toward long-baseline telescopes,

    Wang, B., Luo, X.-Y., Gao, B.-F., Liu, J.-L., Wang, C.-Y., Yan, Z., Ke, Q.-M., Teng, D., Zheng, M.-Y., Cao, Y., et al., “Memory-assisted nonlocal interferometer toward long-baseline telescopes,”Physical Review Letters136(24), 240801 (2026)

    work page 2026

  8. [8]

    Interferometric imaging using shared quantum entanglement,

    Brown, M. R., Allgaier, M., Thiel, V., Monnier, J. D., Raymer, M. G., and Smith, B. J., “Interferometric imaging using shared quantum entanglement,”Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 210801 (Nov 2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Entanglement-assisted non-local optical interferometry in a quantum network,

    Stas, P.-J., Wei, Y.-C., Sirotin, M., Huan, Y. Q., Yazlar, U., Abdo Arias, F., Knyazev, E., Baranes, G., Machielse, B., Grandi, S., Riedel, D., Borregaard, J., Park, H., Lonˇ car, M., Suleymanzade, A., and Lukin, M. D., “Entanglement-assisted non-local optical interferometry i...

    2026

  2. [10]

    Goodman, J., [Introduction to Fourier Optics], McGraw-Hill physical and quantum electronics series, W. H. Freeman (2005)

    2005

  3. [11]

    Nielsen, M. A. and Chuang, I. L., [Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition], Cambridge University Press (2010)

    2010

  4. [12]

    Scalable photonic quantum computation through cavity-assisted interac- tions,

    Duan, L.-M. and Kimble, H. J., “Scalable photonic quantum computation through cavity-assisted interac- tions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 127902 (Mar 2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    and Lovett, B

    Kok, P. and Lovett, B. W., [Introduction to Optical Quantum Information Processing], Cambridge University Press (Apr. 2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Boosted linear-optical measurements on single-rail qubits with unen- tangled ancillas,

    Sajjad, A., Padilla, I., and Guha, S., “Boosted linear-optical measurements on single-rail qubits with unen- tangled ancillas,” (2026)

    2026

  7. [15]

    W., [Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory], Academic Press, New York (1976)

    Helstrom, C. W., [Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory], Academic Press, New York (1976)

    1976

  8. [16]

    Application of quantum estimation theory to analog communication over quantum channels,

    Personick, S., “Application of quantum estimation theory to analog communication over quantum channels,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory17(3), 240–246 (1971)

    1971

  9. [17]

    Quantum limits of parameter estimation in long-baseline imaging,

    Sajjad, A., Grace, M. R., and Guha, S., “Quantum limits of parameter estimation in long-baseline imaging,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013212 (Feb 2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Quantum limits of brightness estimation for incoherent imaging,

    Deshler, N., Grace, M. R., Ashok, A., and Guha, S., “Quantum limits of brightness estimation for incoherent imaging,” Unpublished manuscript

  11. [19]

    The airy fiber: an optical fiber that guides light diffracted by a circular aperture,

    Gris-S´ anchez, I., Ras, D. V., and Birks, T. A., “The airy fiber: an optical fiber that guides light diffracted by a circular aperture,”Optica3, 270–276 (Mar 2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,

    Knill, E., Laflamme, R., and Milburn, G. J., “A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics,”Nature409, 46–52 (Jan. 2001)

    2001

  13. [21]

    Quantum closure phase for robust imaging at the single-photon level,

    Gorshkov, A. V., Gottesman, D., Khabiboulline, E. T., Liu, Z., McClinton, B., Rajagopal, J., and Ridgway, S. T., “Quantum closure phase for robust imaging at the single-photon level,” in [Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging X],Proceedings of SPIE(July 2026). To appear

    2026

  14. [22]

    Measuring gravitational lensing time delays with quantum information processing,

    Liu, Z., DeRocco, W., Gu, S., Khabiboulline, E. T., Choi, S., Childs, A. M., Hook, A., Gorshkov, A. V., and Gottesman, D., “Measuring gravitational lensing time delays with quantum information processing,” (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    Architecture design study and technology road map for the Planet Formation Imager (PFI),

    Monnier, J. D., Ireland, M. J., Kraus, S., Baron, F., Creech-Eakman, M., Dong, R., Isella, A., Merand, A., Michael, E., Minardi, S., Mozurkewich, D., Petrov, R., Rinehart, S., Brummelaar, T. t., Vasisht, G., Wishnow, E., Young, J., and Zhu, Z., “Architecture design study and t...

    2016

  16. [24]

    Heterodyne interferometry: review and prospects,

    Bourdarot, G., “Heterodyne interferometry: review and prospects,” in [Optical and Infrared Interferometry and Imaging VIII],12183, 390, SPIE (Aug. 2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,

    Duan, L.-M., Lukin, M. D., Cirac, J. I., and Zoller, P., “Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics,”Nature414(6862), 413–418 (2001)

    2001

  18. [26]

    Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit,

    Togan, E., Chu, Y., Trifonov, A. S., Jiang, L., Maze, J., Childress, L., Dutt, M. G., Sørensen, A. S., Hemmer, P. R., Zibrov, A. S., et al., “Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solid-state spin qubit,”Nature466(7307), 730–734 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres,

    Bernien, H., Hensen, B., Pfaff, W., Koolstra, G., Blok, M. S., Robledo, L., Taminiau, T. H., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., Childress, L., et al., “Heralded entanglement between solid-state qubits separated by three metres,”Nature497(7447), 86–90 (2013)

    2013

  20. [28]

    Quantum network nodes based on diamond qubits with an efficient nanophotonic interface,

    Nguyen, C., Sukachev, D., Bhaskar, M., Machielse, B., Levonian, D., Knall, E., Stroganov, P., Riedinger, R., Park, H., Lonˇ car, M., et al., “Quantum network nodes based on diamond qubits with an efficient nanophotonic interface,”Physical review letters123(18), 183602 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network,

    Knaut, C. M., Suleymanzade, A., Wei, Y.-C., Assumpcao, D. R., Stas, P.-J., Huan, Y. Q., Machielse, B., Knall, E. N., Sutula, M., Baranes, G., et al., “Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom network,”Nature629(8012), 573–578 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    A ten-qubit solid-state spin register with quantum memory up to one minute,

    Bradley, C. E., Randall, J., Abobeih, M. H., Berrevoets, R. C., Degen, M. J., Bakker, M. A., Markham, M., Twitchen, D. J., and Taminiau, T. H., “A ten-qubit solid-state spin register with quantum memory up to one minute,”Physical Review X9(3), 031045 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    High-fidelity projective read-out of a solid-state spin quantum register,

    Robledo, L., Childress, L., Bernien, H., Hensen, B., Alkemade, P. F., and Hanson, R., “High-fidelity projective read-out of a solid-state spin quantum register,”Nature477(7366), 574–578 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits,

    Pompili, M., Hermans, S. L., Baier, S., Beukers, H. K., Humphreys, P. C., Schouten, R. N., Vermeulen, R. F., Tiggelman, M. J., dos Santos Martins, L., Dirkse, B., et al., “Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits,”Science372(6539), 259–264 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated error detection,

    Stas, P.-J., Huan, Y. Q., Machielse, B., Knall, E. N., Suleymanzade, A., Pingault, B., Sutula, M., Ding, S. W., Knaut, C. M., Assumpcao, D. R., et al., “Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated error detection,”Science378(6619), 557–560 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Entanglement between a diamond spin qubit and a photonic time-bin qubit at telecom wavelength,

    Tchebotareva, A., Hermans, S. L., Humphreys, P. C., Voigt, D., Harmsma, P. J., Cheng, L. K., Verlaan, A. L., Dijkhuizen, N., De Jong, W., Dr´ eau, A., et al., “Entanglement between a diamond spin qubit and a photonic time-bin qubit at telecom wavelength,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1...

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits,

    Stolk, A. J., van der Enden, K. L., Slater, M.-C., te Raa-Derckx, I., Botma, P., Van Rantwijk, J., Biemond, J. B., Hagen, R. A., Herfst, R. W., Koek, W. D., et al., “Metropolitan-scale heralded entanglement of solid-state qubits,”Science advances10(44), eadp6442 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Multiplexed entanglement of multi-emitter quantum network nodes,

    Ruskuc, A., Wu, C.-J., Green, E., Hermans, S. L., Pajak, W., Choi, J., and Faraon, A., “Multiplexed entanglement of multi-emitter quantum network nodes,”Nature639(8053), 54–59 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    High-fidelity spin and optical control of single silicon-vacancy centres in silicon carbide,

    Nagy, R., Niethammer, M., Widmann, M., Chen, Y.-C., Udvarhelyi, P., Bonato, C., Hassan, J. U., Karhu, R., Ivanov, I. G., Son, N. T., et al., “High-fidelity spin and optical control of single silicon-vacancy centres in silicon carbide,”Nature communications10(1), 1954 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Quantum properties of dichroic silicon vacancies in silicon carbide,

    Nagy, R., Widmann, M., Niethammer, M., Dasari, D. B., Gerhardt, I., Soykal, ¨O. O., Radulaski, M., Ohshima, T., Vuˇ ckovi´ c, J., Son, N. T., et al., “Quantum properties of dichroic silicon vacancies in silicon carbide,”Physical Review Applied9(3), 034022 (2018)

    2018

  31. [39]

    Experimental generation of spin-photon entanglement in silicon carbide,

    Fang, R.-Z., Lai, X.-Y., Li, T., Su, R.-Z., Lu, B.-W., Yang, C.-W., Liu, R.-Z., Qiao, Y.-K., Li, C., He, Z.-G., et al., “Experimental generation of spin-photon entanglement in silicon carbide,”Physical Review Letters132(16), 160801 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Telecom-heralded entan- glement between multimode solid-state quantum memories,

    Lago-Rivera, D., Grandi, S., Rakonjac, J. V., Seri, A., and De Riedmatten, H., “Telecom-heralded entan- glement between multimode solid-state quantum memories,”Nature594(7861), 37–40 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Heralded entanglement distribution between two absorptive quantum memories,

    Liu, X., Hu, J., Li, Z.-F., Li, X., Li, P.-Y., Liang, P.-J., Zhou, Z.-Q., Li, C.-F., and Guo, G.-C., “Heralded entanglement distribution between two absorptive quantum memories,”Nature594(7861), 41–45 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Quantum networks using rare-earth ions,

    Tittel, W., Afzelius, M., Kinos, A., Rippe, L., and Walther, A., “Quantum networks using rare-earth ions,” Quantum Science and Technology10(3), 033002 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Coherent state assisted entanglement generation between quantum memories,

    Cui, C., Dhara, P., and Guha, S., “Coherent state assisted entanglement generation between quantum memories,” (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    Entangling quantum memories at channel capacity,

    Dhara, P., Jiang, L., and Guha, S., “Entangling quantum memories at channel capacity,”Optica Quantum3, 480–486 (2025)

    2025

  37. [45]

    Achieving the ultimate end-to-end rates of lossy quantum communication networks,

    Winnel, M. S., Guanzon, J. J., Hosseinidehaj, N., and Ralph, T. C., “Achieving the ultimate end-to-end rates of lossy quantum communication networks,”npj Quantum Information8, 129 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Programmable quantum matter: Heralding large cluster states in driven inhomogeneous spin ensembles,

    Anand, P., Follet, L., Hooybergs, O., and Englund, D. R., “Programmable quantum matter: Heralding large cluster states in driven inhomogeneous spin ensembles,”PRX Quantum7(2), 020362 (2026)

    2026

  39. [47]

    Telecom networking with a diamond quantum memory,

    Bersin, E., Sutula, M., Huan, Y. Q., Suleymanzade, A., Assumpcao, D. R., Wei, Y.-C., Stas, P.-J., Knaut, C. M., Knall, E. N., Langrock, C., et al., “Telecom networking with a diamond quantum memory,”PRX Quantum5(1), 010303 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.