Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Simultaneous Heisenberg-Limited Multiparameter Metrology via Indefinite Evolution

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coherently superposing different evolution channels can separate noncommuting signals into distinct subsystems, so one common measurement reaches the simultaneous Heisenberg limit for multiparameter estimation.

desk verdict New and promising idea for multiparameter metrology, but the missing compensation operations C± are a load-bearing gap that leaves the central equation unproven. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10490 v1 pith:WS4D7WBT submitted 2026-08-11 quant-ph

Hang Xu , Tailong Xiao , Ze Zheng , Xiaoyang Deng , Jinfeng Zheng , Jingzheng Huang , Guihua Zeng This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords indefiniteevolutionmultiparameterquantummetrologyHeisenberglimitFisherinformationmatrixsignalreversalauxiliaryqubitsubspaceprojectionerrorcorrection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Multiparameter quantum sensing usually runs into two obstacles: noncommuting signal generators prevent optimal encoding for all parameters at once, and the optimal measurements for different parameters are mutually incompatible. The paper claims that indefinite evolution—coherently superposing different sensing channels via auxiliary control—removes both obstacles. For a qubit probe with orthogonal generators ($H=\alpha X+\beta Z$), the protocol maps the $\beta$ signal into an auxiliary qubit and leaves $\alpha$ in the probe; the two are then read out by compatible measurements, and the classical Fisher information matrix is diagonal with Heisenberg scaling ($\sim 4t^2$) for each parameter. The same separation is achieved for non-parallel and parallel generators (the latter requiring signal reversal), and extended to noisy, many-qubit, and high-dimensional probes. If correct, indefinite evolution is an operational resource for attaining the simultaneous Heisenberg limit in multiparameter sensing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the indefinite-evolution encoding block $\mathcal{E}$: a controlled superposition of the sensing channel $U(\alpha,\beta)$ and a conjugated channel $D U(\alpha,\nu\beta) D^\dagger$, where $D$ is an auxiliary gate satisfying $[D,G_1]=0$ and $\{D,G_2\}=0$, and $\nu=\pm1$ selects whether the $\beta$ signal is reversed. In the short-time limit, this block (followed by decoding) gives $e^{-i\beta Z_a \Delta t}|+\rangle_a \otimes e^{-i\alpha G_1 \Delta t}|\varphi\rangle_p$. The history-dependent compensation operations $C_+$ and $C_-$, applied in the $\{|+\rangle_a,|-\rangle_a\}$ basis between time slices, are what make the two branches accumulate the same effective auxiliary evolution, so that repeated slicing integrates to the product state of Eq. (7). That product state is the reason the CFIM is diagonal and simultaneously Heisenberg-limited.

What would settle it

Build the two-slice IE circuit for $H=\alpha X+\beta Z$ with explicit gate definitions for $C_+$ and $C_-$ that contain no dependence on $\alpha$ or $\beta$, and measure the resulting classical Fisher information matrix; if the cross term $F_{\alpha\beta}$ fails to vanish or $F_\beta$ does not scale as $4t^2$, the product-state separation of Eq. (7) does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that indefinite evolution converts a multiparameter estimation problem into two effectively single-parameter problems by assigning each signal to its own subsystem. For $H=\alpha X+\beta Z$, a short-time encoding block superposes $U(\alpha,\beta)$ with $D U(\alpha,\beta) D^\dagger$ for $D=X$; because $X$ commutes with the $\alpha$ generator $X$ and anticommutes with the $\beta$ generator $Z$, the $\beta$ phase appears on the auxiliary control qubit as $e^{-i\beta Z_a \Delta t}$ while the probe accumulates $e^{-i\alpha X \Delta t}$. Repeating with history-dependent compensation $C_+,C_-$ yields, in the continuous limit, $e^{-i\beta Z_a t}|+\rangle_a \otimes e^{-i\alpha X t}|\varphi\rangle_p$. The parameters are thus separated into different degrees of freedom, the quantum and classical Fisher information matrices become diagonal, and the simultaneous Heisenberg limit is attained under compatible optimal measurements. The paper proves this for orthogonal generators without signal reversal, for non-parallel generators without signal reversal (with effective CFI $4t^2 \cos^2\theta$), and for parallel generators only when signal reversal is available, while definite evolution with temporal signal reversal reaches at most a single-parameter Heisenberg limit. A general theorem extends the result to any pair of nonparallel traceless projected generators in a two-dimensional encoding subspace.

Load-bearing premise

The compensation operations $C_+$ and $C_-$ must be physically implementable without knowing the signal parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$; the paper does not specify their gate-level construction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a single-qubit probe with orthogonal generators, the simultaneous Heisenberg limit is attainable without signal reversal, recovering the full single-parameter scaling $4t^2$ for both parameters.
  • For parallel generators, signal reversal becomes a necessary resource for indefinite evolution to achieve simultaneous Heisenberg scaling; without it the CFIM is singular and the parameters are not identifiable.
  • Definite evolution, even with signal reversal, can only cancel one signal component via temporal reversal and thus remains at single-parameter Heisenberg scaling.
  • Under Markovian X-type or X-plus-Z noise, indefinite evolution with additional syndrome-extraction auxiliary qubits restores simultaneous Heisenberg scaling for both parameters.
  • For an n-qubit probe, local IE blocks achieve spatial Heisenberg scaling ($n^2$) for both parameters at once, and high-dimensional probes reach the same via subspace projection when the projected generators are nonparallel.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to more than two parameters: assigning each additional signal to its own auxiliary qubit should, under the right commutation relations, yield a diagonal CFIM with simultaneous Heisenberg scaling; the paper does not address this case.
  • The short-time Trotter decomposition suggests a finite-slice tradeoff: shorter slices reduce the separation error but require more compensation rounds, and the optimal slice length under decoherence is not analyzed here.
  • The subspace-projection result hints that high-dimensional sensing can be reduced to qubit-like encoding whenever a two-level block diagonalizes the signal; testing this on random three-level generators would quantify how much leakage degrades the simultaneous limit.
  • In noisy settings, the protocol relies on syndrome extraction; combining indefinite evolution with other quantum error-correcting codes may extend simultaneous Heisenberg scaling to non-Markovian or correlated noise, but that is not demonstrated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a multiparameter quantum metrology protocol based on indefinite evolution (IE), in which two noncommuting signal generators are effectively separated by routing one signal component into an auxiliary qubit and leaving the other in the probe. The authors claim that for a single-qubit probe with orthogonal signal generators, IE achieves a diagonal classical Fisher information matrix with Heisenberg scaling for both parameters without signal reversal; for non-parallel generators the same scaling is achieved with a non-diagonal but invertible CFIM; and for parallel generators signal reversal is required. The protocol is extended to noisy qubit probes, multi-qubit probes, and high-dimensional probes via subspace projection, and a general theorem is stated for non-parallel projected generators. The central claim is that definite evolution cannot match this performance under compatible optimal measurements.

Significance. If the central mechanism is valid, the result is significant: it proposes an operational resolution of both encoding incompatibility and measurement incompatibility in multiparameter estimation, with a concrete resource (indefinite evolution) and with falsifiable CFIM predictions. The paper contains no fitted parameters, and the comparison with definite evolution is well posed. The multi-qubit and high-dimensional extensions are natural and, if supported, would broaden the impact. However, the core derivation of the separated evolution, Eq. (7), is not actually carried out in the main text, and the most obvious parameter-independent compensation fails from the second time slice onward; this makes the central claim currently unsupported. The value of the paper therefore depends entirely on whether the missing construction exists and is provided in a complete form.

major comments (4)
  1. [Indefinite-evolution sensing protocol, Eqs. (5)-(7)] The derivation of the central separated evolution (7) hinges on the 'history-dependent compensation operations C+ and C−', but these operations are never specified. This is not a mere exposition gap: for the orthogonal qubit case G1=X, G2=Z, the first-slice condition (6) forces C+ = I and C− = G2 to first order in Δt. With that choice, the second slice leaves a residual −iβΔt(G2−I)|φ> on the |−> branch, whereas the ideal evolution requires −2iβΔt|φ>. Eliminating this residual with a parameter-independent controlled unitary would require U_−(I+G2)=2I on all probe states, which is impossible because I+G2 is singular for G2^2=I. The error is O(βΔt) per slice and accumulates to O(βt), so it does not vanish in the continuous limit. Either the C± operations depend on α and β, which would make the protocol circular, or a non-obvious parameter-independent construction must be supplied in the Supplementary Material. As written, Eq. (7) is not established and the central claim is unsupported.
  2. [Noiseless qubit probe, non-parallel case] For non-parallel generators H=αX+β(X sinθ+Z cosθ), the paper states that IE 'can still extract the Z component of the β signal into the auxiliary qubit' and then quotes F≃4t^2 [[1, sinθ],[sinθ,1]] in Eq. (9), but no explicit protocol, compensation operations, or measurement procedure is given for this case. Since Eq. (4) cannot be satisfied for 0<θ<π/2, the mechanism is not a minor modification of the orthogonal case, and the claimed F matrix needs a derivation. The effective CFI values F_α^eff=F_β^eff=4t^2 cos^2θ also require specifying how the non-diagonal CFIM is inverted in practice. This is a load-bearing gap for the claim that non-parallel generators achieve simultaneous Heisenberg scaling without signal reversal.
  3. [High-dimensional probe, Theorem 1] Theorem 1 is stated without proof. The statement that any pair of nonparallel traceless projected generators retains simultaneous HL scaling is central to the high-dimensional extension, and the proof is not a routine consequence of the two-level example in §6. The proof should be given in the main text or a clearly labeled appendix, including the construction of the effective IE protocol and the derivation of Eq. (15). Without it, the general claim is unsupported.
  4. [Noisy qubit probe] The noisy qubit section presents results only through figures and references to 'the Supplementary Materials'. The main text does not define the noise channels, the syndrome-extraction operations, the recovery operations, or the resulting CFIM expressions. In particular, the claims for the X- and Z-noise case with three auxiliary qubits are not verifiable from the manuscript. The authors should either include the full derivation in the main text or ensure that the Supplementary Material is self-contained and provided with the submission.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] There is a typo in the phrase 'under a compatible optimal measurement scheme', which reads 'udner' in the manuscript.
  2. [Multiparameter quantum sensing, Eq. (2)] The notation G_i is used for both the bare generator in H=Σ h_i G_i and the dressed generator defined in Eq. (2). These are different objects; please use a distinct symbol, e.g. \bar{G}_i, for the dressed generator.
  3. [Figure 2] The figure panels would benefit from labeled axes and a legend identifying FE, QEC, and IE; currently the reader must infer which curve corresponds to which strategy from the text.
  4. [References] Reference [54] contains a typo: 'high-effciency' should read 'high-efficiency'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the separated-evolution claim is derived from the explicit encoding block and standard Fisher-information calculus, with only non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. For the orthogonal qubit case G1=X, G2=Z with D=X, Eq. (5) is obtained by direct first-order expansion of the controlled encoding block, and the compensation choice C+=I, C−=G2 (with the auxiliary flip) converts the |−> component generated by the beta signal back to |+> with the correct phase. Iterating the same fixed operations gives Eq. (7), and the diagonal CFIM 4t^2 with zero cross term follows by differentiating the product state; no parameter is fitted and no external result is imported. The non-orthogonal and parallel cases are asserted more briefly, and the explicit form of the compensation operations is not written out, but this is a completeness or correctness gap rather than a circular reduction: the claimed result is not used as the definition of the protocol, and for the orthogonal case the operations are fixed and parameter-independent. Self-citations from the same group appear only in general background or as related prior work and are not load-bearing for the simultaneous-Heisenberg-limit claim. Hence no step of the derivation reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The protocol introduces no new physical entities; it uses standard qubits and controlled operations. The main assumptions concern the physical realizability of the compensation operations and the validity of the short-time and Zeno limits.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The short-time Trotter expansion U_Δt(α,β) ≈ e^{-iβG2Δt} e^{-iαG1Δt} holds, and the continuous limit is valid as Δt approaches zero.
    Used in deriving Eq. (5) and Eq. (7); the error terms are not bounded in the main text.
  • domain assumption For orthogonal generators, there exists a unitary gate D with [D,G1]=0 and {D,G2}=0; for G1=X and G2=Z, D=X.
    Required for Eq. (4); existence is shown only for the specific example.
  • domain assumption The compensation operations C± can be realized with parameter-independent operations that disentangle the auxiliary and probe after each time slice.
    Required to maintain the product form in Eq. (7); the operations are not specified in the main text.
  • standard math In the high-dimensional case, frequent subspace projections suppress leakage in the Zeno limit, yielding effective generators P_i = P G_i P.
    Standard Zeno effect assumption invoked in the high-dimensional probe section.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simultaneous Heisenberg-Limited Multiparameter Metrology via Indefinite Evolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WS4D7WBT

@misc{pith2026260810490,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simultaneous Heisenberg-Limited Multiparameter Metrology via Indefinite Evolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WS4D7WBT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10490}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum metrology achieves Heisenberg-limited precision in single-parameter estimation, but its multiparameter extension is fundamentally constrained by both parameter-encoding and measurement incompatibility. Noncommuting signal generators may cause incompatible parameter-encoding, preventing the quantum Fisher information matrix from simultaneously achieving the Heisenberg scale for all parameters. Due to incompatible optimal measurements, the classical Fisher information matrix represents the practical attainable precision. Here, we introduce a multiparameter metrology framework based on indefinite evolution (IE), in which different control operations and signal reversal are placed in a coherent superposition. For a single-qubit probe with mutually orthogonal signal generators, IE enables compatible parameter encoding and optimal measurement without the signal reversal. For parallel generators, where only signal reversal realized by its generator is available, IE can achieve the same performance. We further extend this mechanism to noisy, many-body, and high-dimensional probes, and establish general conditions for achieving the simultaneous Heisenberg-limit. In contrast, definite evolution cannot achieve the same performance under compatible optimal measurements, even when signal reversal is available. Our results identify IE as an operational resource for overcoming multiparameter incompatibility and open a route toward attainable Heisenberg-limited sensing in interferometric platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.10490 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Indefinite-evolution (IE) sensing protocol. (a) En [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Results of the noiseless qubit probe. (a,b) Estima [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Schematic of the noisy IE protocol. The evolu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (b), SP therefore restores the SHL, whereas with￾out SP, leakage from Henc degrades the CFIM. a b FIG. 4. (a) Multi-qubit probe for n = 2; the inset shows the qubit-number n scaling at t = 1. (b) High-dimensional probe with and without SP. Conclusions.—In summary, we h…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters96, 010401 (2006)

    2006

  2. [2]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Reviews of Modern Physics89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Pirandola, B

    S. Pirandola, B. R. Bardhan, T. Gehring, C. Weedbrook, and S. Lloyd, Advances in photonic quantum sensing, Nature Photonics12, 724 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Colombo, E

    S. Colombo, E. Pedrozo-Penafiel, A. F. Adiyatullin, Z. Li, E. Mendez, C. Shu, and V. Vuleti´ c, Time-reversal-based quantum metrology with many-body entangled states, Nature Physics18, 925 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [6]

    Macr` ı, A

    T. Macr` ı, A. Smerzi, and L. Pezz` e, Loschmidt echo for quantum metrology, Physical Review A94, 010102 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [7]

    T. Xiao, J. Fan, and G. Zeng, Parameter estimation in quantum sensing based on deep reinforcement learning, npj Quantum Information8, 2 (2022)

    2022

  7. [8]

    Reinforcement-Learned Electric-Field Sensing with Asymmetrically Blockaded Rydberg Arrays

    S.-Q. Qiao, X.-K. Song, S.-L. Su, L. Ye, and D. Wang, Reinforcement-learned electric-field sensing with asym- metrically blockaded rydberg arrays, arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.01832 (2026)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  8. [9]

    G. Chen, N. Aharon, Y.-N. Sun, Z.-H. Zhang, W.-H. Zhang, D.-Y. He, J.-S. Tang, X.-Y. Xu, Y. Kedem, C.-F. Li,et al., Heisenberg-scaling measurement of the single-photon kerr non-linearity using mixed states, Na- ture Communications9, 93 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 81 references
  1. [10]

    H. Xu, T. Xiao, J. Huang, M. He, J. Fan, and G. Zeng, Toward heisenberg limit without critical slowing down via quantum reinforcement learning, Physical Review Letters134, 120803 (2025)

    2025

  2. [11]

    Liu and Y

    Q. Liu and Y. Yang, Heisenberg-limited quantum metrol- ogy without ancillae, Physical Review Letters135, 140801 (2025)

    2025

  3. [12]

    Chen and Y

    L. Chen and Y. Yang, Optimal quantum metrology under energy constraints, Physical Review Letters136, 070801 (2026)

    2026

  4. [13]

    Shi, X.-W

    H.-L. Shi, X.-W. Guan, and J. Yang, Universal shot- noise limit for quantum metrology with local hamilto- 6 nians, Physical Review Letters132, 100803 (2024)

    2024

  5. [14]

    L. Xiao, Y. Chu, Q. Lin, H. Lin, W. Yi, J. Cai, and P. Xue, Non-hermitian sensing in the absence of ex- ceptional points, Physical Review Letters133, 180801 (2024)

    2024

  6. [15]

    M. Yu, X. Li, Y. Chu, B. Mera, F. N. ¨Unal, P. Yang, Y. Liu, N. Goldman, and J. Cai, Experimental demon- stration of topological bounds in quantum metrology, Na- tional Science Review11, nwae065 (2024)

    2024

  7. [16]

    Y. Chu, X. Li, and J. Cai, Strong quantum metrological limit from many-body physics, Physical Review Letters 130, 170801 (2023)

    2023

  8. [17]

    Zhang and X

    Y. Zhang and X. Yuan, Quantum algorithms for fidelity susceptibility: From quantum criticality to metrology, Physical Review Letters136, 080604 (2026)

    2026

  9. [18]

    N. Kong, M. G. Paris, and Q. He, Enhanced quantum metrology by criticality-assisted noncommutative prepa- ration, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.21219 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  10. [19]

    R. Liu, X. Yang, X. Lv, X. Long, H. Liu, D. Lu, Y. Dong, and J. Li, Experimental realization of quantum zeno dy- namics for robust quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters135, 250805 (2025)

    2025

  11. [20]

    H. Xu, T. Xiao, J. Huang, J. Fan, and G. Zeng, Learning to restore heisenberg limit in noisy quantum sensing via quantum digital twin, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.11198 (2025)

    2025

  12. [21]

    Bai and J.-H

    S.-Y. Bai and J.-H. An, Floquet engineering to overcome no-go theorem of noisy quantum metrology, Physical Re- view Letters131, 050801 (2023)

    2023

  13. [22]

    E. M. Kessler, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum error correction for metrology, Physical Review Letters112, 150802 (2014)

    2014

  14. [23]

    D¨ ur, M

    W. D¨ ur, M. Skotiniotis, F. Froewis, and B. Kraus, Im- proved quantum metrology using quantum error correc- tion, Physical Review Letters112, 080801 (2014)

    2014

  15. [24]

    Unden, P

    T. Unden, P. Balasubramanian, D. Louzon, Y. Vinkler, M. B. Plenio, M. Markham, D. Twitchen, A. Stacey, I. Lovchinsky, A. O. Sushkov,et al., Quantum metrology enhanced by repetitive quantum error correction, Physi- cal Review Letters116, 230502 (2016)

    2016

  16. [25]

    Reiter, A

    F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and C. Muschik, Dissipative quantum error correction and application to quantum sensing with trapped ions, Nature Communica- tions8, 1822 (2017)

    2017

  17. [26]

    S. Zhou, M. Zhang, J. Preskill, and L. Jiang, Achiev- ing the heisenberg limit in quantum metrology using quantum error correction, Nature Communications9, 78 (2018)

    2018

  18. [27]

    Layden, S

    D. Layden, S. Zhou, P. Cappellaro, and L. Jiang, Ancilla- free quantum error correction codes for quantum metrol- ogy, Physical Review Letters122, 040502 (2019)

    2019

  19. [28]

    H. Chen, Y. Chen, J. Liu, Z. Miao, and H. Yuan, Quantum metrology enhanced by leveraging informative noise with error correction, Physical Review Letters133, 190801 (2024)

    2024

  20. [29]

    H. Kwon, U. R. Fischer, S.-W. Lee, and L. Jiang, Restor- ing heisenberg scaling in time via autonomous quantum error correction, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13168 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  21. [30]

    H. Xu, X. Deng, Z. Zheng, T. Xiao, and G. Zeng, Noise-resilient heisenberg-limited quantum sensing via indefinite-causal-order error correction, Physical Review Letters137, 020801 (2026)

    2026

  22. [31]

    Zhou, Limits of noisy quantum metrology with re- stricted quantum controls, Physical Review Letters133, 170801 (2024)

    S. Zhou, Limits of noisy quantum metrology with re- stricted quantum controls, Physical Review Letters133, 170801 (2024)

    2024

  23. [32]

    Yamamoto, S

    K. Yamamoto, S. Endo, H. Hakoshima, Y. Matsuzaki, and Y. Tokunaga, Error-mitigated quantum metrology via virtual purification, Physical Review Letters129, 250503 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    Lin and H

    X. Lin and H. Yuan, Error-mitigated quantum metrol- ogy via enhanced virtual purification, Communications Physics8, 481 (2025)

    2025

  25. [34]

    Yang, Theory of compression channels for postse- lected quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters132, 250802 (2024)

    J. Yang, Theory of compression channels for postse- lected quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters132, 250802 (2024)

    2024

  26. [35]

    S. Imai, J. Yang, and L. Pezz` e, Hierarchy of satura- tion conditions for multiparameter quantum metrology bounds, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12097 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  27. [36]

    J. Yang, S. Imai, and L. Pezz` e, A geometric criterion for optimal measurements in multiparameter quantum metrology, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21801 (2026)

    2026

  28. [37]

    Mukhopadhyay, A

    C. Mukhopadhyay, A. Bayat, V. Montenegro, and M. G. Paris, Beating joint quantum estimation limits with stepwise multiparameter metrology, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.06075 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Guti´ errez, C

    M. Guti´ errez, C. Mukhopadhyay, V. Montenegro, and A. Bayat, Quantum error correction for multiparameter metrology, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04018 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    Mihailescu, S

    G. Mihailescu, S. Sarkar, A. Bayat, S. Campbell, and A. K. Mitchell, Metrological symmetries in singular quan- tum multi-parameter estimation, Quantum Science and Technology11, 015006 (2026)

    2026

  31. [40]

    J. Liu, H. Yuan, X.-M. Lu, and X. Wang, Quantum fisher information matrix and multiparameter estima- tion, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 53, 023001 (2020)

    2020

  32. [41]

    M. G. Paris, Quantum estimation for quantum technol- ogy, International Journal of Quantum Information7, 125 (2009)

    2009

  33. [42]

    Suzuki, Explicit formula for the holevo bound for two-parameter qubit-state estimation problem, Journal of Mathematical Physics57(2016)

    J. Suzuki, Explicit formula for the holevo bound for two-parameter qubit-state estimation problem, Journal of Mathematical Physics57(2016)

    2016

  34. [43]

    S. Ragy, M. Jarzyna, and R. Demkowicz-Dobrza´ nski, Compatibility in multiparameter quantum metrology, Physical Review A94, 052108 (2016)

    2016

  35. [44]

    Gessner, L

    M. Gessner, L. Pezz` e, and A. Smerzi, Sensitivity bounds for multiparameter quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters121, 130503 (2018)

    2018

  36. [45]

    Zhou and S

    S. Zhou and S. Chen, Randomized measurements for multiparameter quantum metrology, PRX Quantum7, 010314 (2026)

    2026

  37. [46]

    A. Z. Goldberg, L. L. S´ anchez-Soto, and H. Ferretti, Intrinsic sensitivity limits for multiparameter quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters127, 110501 (2021)

    2021

  38. [47]

    H. Chen, L. Wang, and H. Yuan, Simultaneous measure- ment of multiple incompatible observables and tradeoff in multiparameter quantum estimation, npj Quantum In- formation10, 98 (2024)

    2024

  39. [48]

    Z. Hou, Z. Zhang, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, H. Chen, L. Liu, and H. Yuan, Minimal tradeoff and ul- timate precision limit of multiparameter quantum mag- netometry under the parallel scheme, Physical Review Letters125, 020501 (2020)

    2020

  40. [49]

    L. Li, Z. Hu, L. Chen, Y. Yang, and H. Yuan, Optimal strategies for multi-parameter quantum metrology, arXiv preprint arXiv:2608.01114 (2026)

    2026 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Marletto and V

    C. Marletto and V. Vedral, Gravitationally induced en- 7 tanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Physical Review Letters119, 240402 (2017)

    2017

  42. [51]

    S. Bose, A. Mazumdar, G. W. Morley, H. Ulbricht, M. Toroˇ s, M. Paternostro, A. A. Geraci, P. F. Barker, M. Kim, and G. Milburn, Spin entanglement witness for quantum gravity, Physical Review Letters119, 240401 (2017)

    2017

  43. [52]

    Davidovich, A

    L. Davidovich, A. Maali, M. Brune, J. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum switches and nonlocal microwave fields, Physical Review Letters71, 2360 (1993)

    1993

  44. [53]

    Goswami, C

    K. Goswami, C. Giarmatzi, M. Kewming, F. Costa, C. Branciard, J. Romero, and A. G. White, Indefinite causal order in a quantum switch, Physical Review Let- ters121, 090503 (2018)

    2018

  45. [54]

    Y. Guo, Y. Chen, G. Chen, X.-M. Hu, Y.-F. Huang, C.- F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and B.-H. Liu, Surpassing the global heisenberg limit using a high-effciency quantum switch, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03290 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Chen, Y.-X

    L. Chen, Y.-X. Yang, G.-C. Li, X.-S. Hong, S.-Q. Zhang, H.-Q. Xu, Y.-C. Liu, G. Chiribella, G. Chen, C.-F. Li,et al., Nonlinear enhancement of measurement precision via a hybrid quantum switch, arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.20632 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  47. [56]

    de la Hamette, V

    A.-C. de la Hamette, V. Kabel, M. Christodoulou, and ˇC. Brukner, Indefinite causal order and quantum coordi- nates, Physical Review Letters135, 141402 (2025)

    2025

  48. [57]

    C. Xi, X. Liu, H. Liu, K. Huang, X. Long, D. Ebler, X. Nie, O. Dahlsten, and D. Lu, Experimental validation of enhanced information capacity by quantum switch in accordance with thermodynamic laws, Physical Review Letters133, 040401 (2024)

    2024

  49. [58]

    Agrawal, P

    G. Agrawal, P. Halder, and A. SenDe, Indefinite time directed quantum metrology, Quantum9, 1785 (2025)

    2025

  50. [59]

    B. Xia, J. Huang, H. Li, Z. Luo, and G. Zeng, Nanoradian-scale precision in light rotation measurement via indefinite quantum dynamics, Science Advances10, eadm8524 (2024)

    2024

  51. [60]

    Chen and J

    P. Chen and J. Jing, Qubit-assisted quantum metrology under a time-reversal strategy, Physical Review A110, 062425 (2024)

    2024

  52. [61]

    Str¨ omberg, P

    T. Str¨ omberg, P. Schiansky, M. T. Quintino, M. An- tesberger, L. A. Rozema, I. Agresti, ˇC. Brukner, and P. Walther, Experimental superposition of a quantum evolution with its time reverse, Physical Review Research 6, 023071 (2024)

    2024

  53. [62]

    Y. Guo, Z. Liu, H. Tang, X.-M. Hu, B.-H. Liu, Y.-F. Huang, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, and G. Chiribella, Exper- imental demonstration of input-output indefiniteness in a single quantum device, Physical Review Letters132, 160201 (2024)

    2024

  54. [63]

    A. J. Parzygnat and J. Fullwood, From time-reversal symmetry to quantum bayes’ rules, PRX Quantum4, 020334 (2023)

    2023

  55. [64]

    Ebler, S

    D. Ebler, S. Salek, and G. Chiribella, Enhanced com- munication with the assistance of indefinite causal order, Physical Review Letters120, 120502 (2018)

    2018

  56. [65]

    Loizeau and A

    N. Loizeau and A. Grinbaum, Channel capacity enhance- ment with indefinite causal order, Physical Review A 101, 012340 (2020)

    2020

  57. [66]

    G. Zhu, Y. Chen, Y. Hasegawa, and P. Xue, Charging quantum batteries via indefinite causal order: Theory and experiment, Physical Review Letters131, 240401 (2023)

    2023

  58. [67]

    Felce and V

    D. Felce and V. Vedral, Quantum refrigeration with indefinite causal order, Physical Review Letters125, 070603 (2020)

    2020

  59. [68]

    A. A. Abbott, M. Mhalla, and P. Pocreau, Quantum query complexity of boolean functions under indefi- nite causal order, Physical Review Research6, L032020 (2024)

    2024

  60. [69]

    N. Ma, P. Zhao, and J. Gong, Quantum machine learn- ing with indefinite causal order, Physical Review A110, 052406 (2024)

    2024

  61. [70]

    N. Kong, H. Wang, M. Tian, Y. Xu, G. Chen, Y. Xiang, and Q. He, Noncommutativity as a universal characteri- zation for enhanced quantum metrology, Physical Review Letters136, 010201 (2026)

    2026

  62. [71]

    X. Zhao, Y. Yang, and G. Chiribella, Quantum metrol- ogy with indefinite causal order, Physical Review Letters 124, 190503 (2020)

    2020

  63. [72]

    P. Yin, X. Zhao, Y. Yang, Y. Guo, W.-H. Zhang, G.-C. Li, Y.-J. Han, B.-H. Liu, J.-S. Xu, G. Chiribella,et al., Experimental super-heisenberg quantum metrology with indefinite gate order, Nature Physics19, 1122 (2023)

    2023

  64. [73]

    Chapeau-Blondeau, Noisy quantum metrology with the assistance of indefinite causal order, Physical Review A103, 032615 (2021)

    F. Chapeau-Blondeau, Noisy quantum metrology with the assistance of indefinite causal order, Physical Review A103, 032615 (2021)

    2021

  65. [74]

    M. An, S. Ru, Y. Wang, Y. Yang, F. Wang, P. Zhang, and F. Li, Noisy quantum parameter estimation with indefi- nite causal order, Physical Review A109, 012603 (2024)

    2024

  66. [75]

    We define the effective CFI as F eff i = 1/(F−1)ii

    For a multiparameter estimator, the attainable variance of parameterh i is determined by the inverse CFIM, Var(ˆhi)≥(F −1)ii/M. We define the effective CFI as F eff i = 1/(F−1)ii

  67. [76]

    Thus the high- dimensional dynamics is reduced to an effective two-level sensing model insideH enc

    For an initial state inH enc, frequent subspace projec- tions give (Pe −iH∆tP)N ≃e −i(αP1+βP2)t in the Zeno limit, wheret=N∆tandP i =PG iP. Thus the high- dimensional dynamics is reduced to an effective two-level sensing model insideH enc

  68. [77]

    The sensing-relevant part is therefore eGi =P i−Tr(Pi)P/2 =g i·σ

    Within the two-dimensional encoding subspace, the iden- tity component ofP i contributes only a parameter- dependent global phase and does not affect the mea- surement statistics. The sensing-relevant part is therefore eGi =P i−Tr(Pi)P/2 =g i·σ

  69. [78]

    The IE protocol trans- fers theZcomponent of the second signal to the aux- iliary qubit while retaining its parallelXcomponent in the probe

    Choose the effective Bloch axes such that eG1 =|g 1|X and eG2 =|g 2|(Xcosθ+Zsinθ). The IE protocol trans- fers theZcomponent of the second signal to the aux- iliary qubit while retaining its parallelXcomponent in the probe. Combining the probe and auxiliary CFIMs givesF= 4t 2|...

  70. [79]

    Their traceless parts are equivalent to−2Zand 2X, respec- tively, so that|g 1|=|g 2|= 2 andθ=π/2

    ForP=|0⟩⟨0|+|1⟩⟨1|, the projected generators are P1 =−2|0⟩⟨0|+ 2|1⟩⟨1|andP 2 = 2(|0⟩⟨1|+|1⟩⟨0|). Their traceless parts are equivalent to−2Zand 2X, respec- tively, so that|g 1|=|g 2|= 2 andθ=π/2

  71. [80]

    Q. Liu, Z. Li, X. Yuan, H. Zhu, and Y. Zhou, Auxiliary- free replica shadows: Efficient estimation of multiple non- linear quantum properties, Physical Review Letters136, 100602 (2026)

    2026

  72. [81]

    Di Meglio, K

    A. Di Meglio, K. Jansen, I. Tavernelli, C. Alexandrou, S. Arunachalam, C. W. Bauer, K. Borras, S. Carrazza, A. Crippa, V. Croft,et al., Quantum computing for high- energy physics: State of the art and challenges, PRX Quantum5, 037001 (2024)

    2024

  73. [82]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, 8 L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Re- views of Modern Physics95, 045006 (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.