Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 59 references

A Dynamical Mechanism for Irreversibility in Cyclically Driven Amorphous Solids

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cyclically sheared amorphous solids do not become irreversible through chaos; they remain locally stable and split through rare branching events caused by competition between nearly degenerate plastic instabilities.

desk verdict The no-chaos result from particle simulations is a real contribution; the mechanism story leans too hard on a model with planted branching. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11073 v1 pith:XK5YGV3Q submitted 2026-08-11 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech

Sauvik Chatterjee , Asaf Szulc , Ido Regev This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.stat-mech
keywords amorphoussolidsirreversibilitytransitionathermalquasistaticshearyieldingtrajectorybranchinglocalstabilityplasticinstabilitiessoft-spotmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how a deterministic, dissipative material can lose memory of its starting state under repeated shear. In particle simulations, small perturbations to the coordinates decay exponentially even when the shearing amplitude is large enough that the material never settles into a repeating pattern, so the dynamics is locally stable and chaotic divergence is ruled out. Instead, trajectories stay close for a random time and then separate in sudden branching events, after which they diffuse apart. Tracking soft spots—localized zones that rearrange—in a mean-field model shows the trigger: a tiny perturbation decides which of two almost equally unstable regions yields first, scrambling the sequence of all later rearrangements. The paper proposes this instability-selection branching as the generic dynamical route to irreversibility in cyclically driven disordered systems.

What carries the argument

The ordering of plastic events is controlled by the distance to instability $x_i$, the gap between each soft spot's current stress and its activation threshold; the next event is the soft spot with the smallest (most negative inside an avalanche) $x_i$. Branching occurs when two sites form a nearly-degenerate pair, quantified by the competition variable $\Delta = x_{187} - x_{157}$ in the example: a perturbation of order $10^{-5}$ flips the sign of $\Delta$, changing which instability activates first. The mean-field soft-spot model with hysteretic elements gives direct access to soft-spot identities and activation order, allowing the paper to watch the competition event by event, while the derivation of the exponential waiting-time distribution uses the known exponential distribution of strain intervals between plastic events under AQS loading.

What would settle it

Run the soft-spot model with the probability of adding a competing instability set to zero and remeasure the post-yield branching rate; if branching disappears, the planted randomness rather than natural threshold disorder is the source of the branching statistics, and the microscopic competition mechanism would not be established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that irreversibility in the post-yield regime of cyclically sheared amorphous solids is produced by persistent trajectory branching, not by exponential sensitivity to initial conditions. Under athermal quasistatic shear, a small perturbation of a trajectory decays rapidly even when the system never returns to a periodic limit cycle; the trajectory is locally stable in the sense of contracting perturbations. Separation happens only when a plastic event selects between two nearly-degenerate instabilities: each unstable soft spot has a distance to instability $x_i=\sigma_i^+ - \sigma_i$, and when two sites are almost tied for the smallest $x_i$, a perturbation of order $10^{-9}$ in the particle model or $10^{-5}$ in the soft-spot model flips which one activates first. The losing instability is not erased but acts later, so the entire sequence of plastic events is reordered and the trajectories land on different branches. After branching the trajectories decorrelate and separate diffusively, with the squared separation growing with slope $8D$ in two dimensions, twice the self-diffusion coefficient. Waiting times between branchings are exponentially distributed, which the paper derives from a constant per-event branching probability, and the branching rate grows as a power law of strain amplitude above yield.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the soft-spot model's rule—injecting a competing instability with probability 0.01 whenever a new configuration appears—faithfully represents how real amorphous solids resolve nearly simultaneous plastic events; if that injected randomness is what creates the branching statistics, the claimed microscopic mechanism would be weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Above yielding, a positive Lyapunov exponent is not required for irreversibility; local stability can coexist with persistent trajectory separation.
  • The branching rate factorizes as $\lambda_b = p_b \lambda_{pl}$, so the irreversibility transition can be described by a constant per-plastic-event probability of branching once the plastic-event rate is known.
  • Post-branching separation grows diffusively with slope $S = 8D$ in two dimensions, meaning branched trajectories are statistically independent and the separation directly measures the material's self-diffusion.
  • The branching rate increases as $\lambda_b \sim (\gamma_{\max} - \gamma_c)^\beta$ with $\beta = 1.34(7)$, connecting the dynamical mechanism to the critical behavior of the irreversibility transition.
  • The same exponential waiting-time statistics appear in both a particle-based model and a mean-field soft-spot model, suggesting the mechanism is generic across driven disordered systems such as colloids, granular materials, and emulsions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If near-degeneracy is the real trigger, widening the disorder in instability thresholds should suppress branching at fixed strain amplitude; this is a direct prediction the paper does not test.
  • The soft-spot model adds a competing instability with probability $p_{ir}=0.01$ only when a new configuration appears; varying this probability as a control parameter would separate the contribution of planted randomness from that of the natural threshold disorder, a distinction the current simulations do not resolve.
  • Because the mechanism reorders activation sequences, it may unify the irreversibility transition with multi-periodic memory and cascade-scrambling phenomena in the same systems; the paper notes the relation but leaves the common statistical description for future work.
  • A direct experimental test in colloidal or granular cyclically sheared systems would be to track pairs of nearby tracer particles: the paper's picture predicts plateaus of near-constant separation punctuated by sudden jumps, rather than smooth exponential growth.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies athermal quasistatic oscillatory shear of a two-dimensional Kob-Andersen glass and a mean-field soft-spot model. Using direct perturbation experiments, the authors report that post-yield trajectories do not exhibit sustained exponential divergence: typical perturbations decay, and irreversibility instead occurs through rare branching events with exponentially distributed waiting times, after which the separation grows diffusively. The soft-spot model reproduces the branching statistics, and by tracking soft-spot activations the authors attribute branching to competition between nearly-degenerate plastic instabilities, where a small perturbation changes which instability activates first and thereby rearranges the subsequent sequence of plastic events. The paper concludes that instability-selection-induced branching, rather than chaos, is the dynamical mechanism for irreversibility.

Significance. The central observational claim—that post-yield AQS trajectories are locally stable and that irreversibility arises through rare branching events—is direct, well-posed, and supported by the particle simulations, which contain no injected stochastic source. The verification that the post-branching separation diffuses with S ≈ 8D provides a quantitative and falsifiable check. If the microscopic mechanism claim is also sustained, the paper would provide a valuable bridge between deterministic dynamics and stochastic descriptions of the irreversibility transition. The main weakness is that the proposed instability-competition mechanism is demonstrated almost entirely in a soft-spot model that contains an explicit stochastic branching injection, so the central mechanistic conclusion is not yet fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary Material, 'Soft-spot model' paragraph after Eq. (12)] The soft-spot model contains an explicit stochastic branching source: a competing soft spot is added with probability p_ir = 0.01 whenever the dynamics reaches a system-wide configuration that has not been visited previously, and without this injection the model reaches a limit cycle for any amplitude (Ref. [30]). The paper's central mechanistic claim—that branching originates from competition between nearly-degenerate plastic instabilities—is therefore partly constructed, because the competing instability is injected stochastically rather than emerging from the natural threshold disorder. The manuscript does not report how the waiting-time distribution or the branching rate depend on p_ir, nor does it show in the particle simulations that a small perturbation reverses the ordering of two nearly-degenerate instabilities. To support the mechanism claim, the authors should either vary p_ir and show that the branching statistics are robust as p_ir is reduced (with near-degenerate pairs arising from threshold disorder), or present direct evidence in the particle simulations that a perturbation changes which of two nearly-degenerate instabilities activates first.
  2. [Results, 'waiting times' paragraph and Fig. 2b; Supplementary Material] The branching event is not quantitatively defined. The waiting-time distribution and the branching rate λ_b (Fig. 3a) depend on a criterion for when two trajectories 'separate,' but the paper does not state it—for example, a threshold value of Dr, a stress-signal mismatch, or the first plastic event with a different activation sequence. Without an explicit criterion, the exponential fit in Fig. 2b and the power-law exponent β = 1.34(7) cannot be independently reproduced or checked for robustness against the choice of threshold. A precise definition and a sensitivity analysis should be added.
  3. [Results, 'trajectory stability' paragraphs and Fig. 1] The negative claim that sustained exponential sensitivity to initial conditions is ruled out is stronger than the data support. The experiment uses N = 1000 particles, δ = 10^-9, and about 100 cycles; a finite-time Lyapunov analysis over this horizon, with rare branching events, can rule out large positive exponents but not arbitrarily small ones, and the absence of exponential divergence could be size- or protocol-dependent. The authors should soften the claim or provide a quantitative upper bound on the finite-time Lyapunov exponent consistent with their data.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'becoms' should be 'becomes'.
  2. [Main text after Eq. (6)] The sentence 'we calculated the slope for the squared distance (Fig. 3a)' appears to reference the wrong panel; the mean-square distance is shown in Fig. 3b.
  3. [Supplementary Material, 'Soft-spot model' paragraph] The statement 'Once a previously visited system-wide configuration is reached, we set p_ir = 0' is ambiguous: it is unclear whether p_ir is set to zero for the remainder of the simulation after the first return, or only at that specific step. This affects whether branching can occur after a return and should be clarified.
  4. [Supplementary Material, Eqs. (17)-(26)] The derivation of the exponential waiting-time distribution assumes that strain intervals between successive plastic events are exponentially distributed. This assumption should be verified explicitly for the present particle simulations, since the cited observations were made in other settings.
  5. [Results, Fig. 3 and perturbation protocols] The perturbation magnitude differs between the particle simulations (δ = 10^-9) and the soft-spot model (δ = 10^-5), and no test of the sensitivity of the branching rate to δ is reported. Since branching is threshold-mediated, δ may enter the rate; the authors should state the expected insensitivity or provide a check.
  6. [Fig. 1(d)] The branching diagram uses line thickness to represent the number of perturbed trajectories along a path, but no quantitative key is provided.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The no-chaos result is independently supported by particle simulations, but the microscopic competition mechanism is built into the soft-spot model via the explicit p_ir branching injection.

  1. self definitional [Supplementary Material, 'Soft-spot model' section; main-text abstract and Results paragraph on the soft-spot model]
    "In the absence of competing soft spots, the hierarchical multi-well dynamics described above eventually reaches a limit cycle under cyclic driving, for any driving amplitude [30]. However, atomistic simulations reveal cases in which overlapping soft spots do not follow this switching order [30]. To represent such events, whenever the dynamics reaches a system-wide configuration that has not been visited previously, a competing soft spot ˜n is added with probability p_ir = 0.01, with a randomly drawn threshold σ+˜n < σ+n that is lower than that of the incumbent soft spot n."

    The paper uses the soft-spot model to 'reveal the microscopic origin' of branching and concludes that 'branching originates from competition between nearly-degenerate plastic instabilities.' But the model's branching is generated by an explicit injection rule: without p_ir the model always reaches a limit cycle, and with p_ir a new competitor with a deliberately lower threshold is created, guaranteeing an alternative branch. The near-degenerate pair in Fig. 5 (sites 157 and 187) is therefore produced by the p_ir rule rather than by emergent instability selection from natural threshold disorder. The particle-based simulations, which contain no p_ir, demonstrate that branching occurs but do not directly observe the proposed soft-spot competition.

full rationale

The paper's primary dynamical-systems claim—that post-yield trajectories are locally stable and that irreversibility arises through rare branching rather than sustained exponential sensitivity—is supported directly by the particle-based AQS simulations, which contain no injected randomness. That part is self-contained and not circular. The exponential waiting-time calculation in the Supplementary Material is a standard compound-distribution derivation; it is not itself circular, but its interpretation as evidence for the microscopic mechanism inherits the problem of the model. The circularity is concentrated in the identification of the microscopic origin: the soft-spot model, previously introduced by the same authors, includes the explicit stochastic branching source p_ir = 0.01, which is exactly the phenomenon the paper claims to explain. The observation of near-degenerate competing instabilities in Fig. 5 is a direct consequence of this injection rule, making the 'instability-selection-induced branching' mechanism partially definitional rather than emergent. The particle simulations support the existence of branching, but not the specific competition mechanism, so the central microscopic claim reduces, in part, to the model's built-in branching input.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The main burden on the reader is accepting the soft-spot model's representational power, since the microscopic mechanism is identified inside that model, and the model contains a planted stochastic branching injection (p_ir=0.01). The particle simulations provide independent evidence for branching itself, but not for the specific instability-selection mechanism. The exponential waiting-time derivation requires exponential plastic-event intervals and a constant per-event branching probability, both assumed or fitted rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (7)
  • p_ir = 0.01
    Probability of adding a competing soft spot at each new system-wide configuration in the soft-spot model; this is the explicit stochastic branching injection and is central to the model's irreversibility and branching statistics.
  • Threshold distribution width = sigma = 0.09 in folded normal distribution
    Model parameter controlling the disorder of soft-spot instability thresholds; chosen by hand in the soft-spot model and affecting how often near-degenerate instabilities occur.
  • Stress-drop factor and random fraction = 0.5 and Y ~ U[0,1)
    Model parameters governing the stress change after a soft-spot switch; they affect avalanche sizes and the statistics of competing instabilities.
  • Interaction kernel amplitude = eta ~ U[-0.2, 0.2)
    Amplitude of the random mean-field stress redistribution kernel in the soft-spot model; controls the coupling between sites and hence the propagation of instability selection.
  • Perturbation magnitude delta = 1e-9 (particles), 1e-5 (soft-spot stress)
    Chosen perturbation sizes for the stability tests; branching rates and decay behavior could in principle depend on this scale, though the authors state another perturbation form gave qualitatively similar results.
  • Branching probability per plastic event p_b = Not independently measured; inferred from lambda_b = p_b lambda_pl
    The theoretical explanation treats branching as a constant-probability Bernoulli event per plastic event; the exponential waiting-time rate lambda_b is fit to simulation data, so p_b is an inferred quantity rather than a measured one.
  • Branching rate power-law exponent beta = 1.34(7)
    Fitted exponent for the branching rate lambda_b versus gamma_max - gamma_c over the post-yield amplitudes studied; presented as a fit, not as a parameter-free prediction.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AQS dynamics, consisting of strain increments followed by energy minimization, contracts perturbations between nearby configurations.
    Invoked in the Introduction to motivate the puzzle and in interpreting the observed exponential decay of Dr (Figs 1a,b); assumes minimization acts as a contraction map for the perturbations studied.
  • domain assumption In finite AQS systems, strain intervals between successive plastic events are approximately exponentially distributed.
    Used in the derivation of the exponential waiting-time distribution (Supplementary Material, 'Theoretical derivations'), citing Refs [37,43].
  • domain assumption After a branching event, the plastic-event sequences of the two trajectories become statistically decorrelated.
    Used to derive the S=8D relation for diffusive separation; the authors verify the slope ratio S/(4D) = 2.01 in the same simulations, so the assumption is consistency-checked rather than independently established.
  • domain assumption The soft-spot model's hysteretic elements and their interactions faithfully represent plastic instabilities in amorphous solids.
    The model is from the authors' prior work [30]; the microscopic mechanism is read off from this model, so its representational fidelity is load-bearing for the mechanistic conclusion.
  • ad hoc to paper Once a previously visited system-wide configuration is reached in the soft-spot model, the probability of adding competing soft spots is set to zero, preserving determinism.
    This rule (Supplementary Material, 'Soft-spot model') is a modeling device needed to keep the model deterministic when revisiting configurations; it controls when stochastic branching can be injected.
invented entities (1)
  • Competing soft spot added with probability p_ir
    purpose: Provides an alternative instability that can activate before the incumbent soft spot, changing the ordering of plastic events and initiating trajectory branching in the soft-spot model.
    The competing soft spot is a modeling construct introduced in the soft-spot model; it is not independently measured in experiments or particle simulations, though the authors argue the instability-selection competition mirrors what happens naturally in the particle system.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Dynamical Mechanism for Irreversibility in Cyclically Driven Amorphous Solids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XK5YGV3Q

@misc{pith2026260811073,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Dynamical Mechanism for Irreversibility in Cyclically Driven Amorphous Solids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XK5YGV3Q}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11073}
}
read the original abstract

Amorphous solids subjected to athermal quasistatic oscillatory shear undergo a transition from periodic reversible dynamics to irreversible diffusive dynamics at yielding. How irreversibility arises in such deterministic, dissipative dynamics remains unclear. Here we show that trajectories remain locally stable, with perturbations decaying rather than growing even in the irreversible regime, ruling out the sustained exponential sensitivity to initial conditions associated with chaotic dynamics. Rather than diverging continuously, nearby trajectories initially remain close before eventually separating through rare branching events, after which their separation grows diffusively. A mean-field soft-spot model reproduces the same branching statistics and reveals their microscopic origin. We find that branching originates from competition between nearly-degenerate plastic instabilities, in which a small perturbation changes which instability activates first and thereby alters the subsequent sequence of plastic events. These results identify instability-selection-induced branching as a dynamical mechanism for irreversibility in cyclically driven amorphous solids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11073 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Mean Euclidean distance of a trajectory per [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Trajectory separation in the particle-based sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Steady-state branching rate for different strain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. An example of the beginning of a trajectory branching observed in the soft-spot model. The reference and perturbed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Distances to instability [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. An exponential fit (red line) to a typical small, spon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The MSD as measured from 100 realizations and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [30]

    Overlapping plastic events as a mechanism for irreversible dynamics in amorphous solids under oscillatory shear.Physical Review Research, 6(3):033129, 2024

    Asaf Szulc and Ido Regev. Overlapping plastic events as a mechanism for irreversible dynamics in amorphous solids under oscillatory shear.Physical Review Research, 6(3):033129, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Onset of irreversibility and chaos in amorphous solids under periodic shear.Physical Review E, 88(6):062401, 2013

    Ido Regev, Turab Lookman, and Charles Reichhardt. Onset of irreversibility and chaos in amorphous solids under periodic shear.Physical Review E, 88(6):062401, 2013

    2013

  3. [2]

    Pe- riodic training of creeping solids.Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences, 117(50):31690–31695, 2020

    Daniel Hexner, Andrea J Liu, and Sidney R Nagel. Pe- riodic training of creeping solids.Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences, 117(50):31690–31695, 2020

    work page 2020

  4. [3]

    En- coding of memory in sheared amorphous solids.Physical Review Letters, 112(2):025702, 2014

    Davide Fiocco, Giuseppe Foffi, and Srikanth Sastry. En- coding of memory in sheared amorphous solids.Physical Review Letters, 112(2):025702, 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [4]

    Os- cillatory athermal quasi-static deformation of a model glass.Phys

    Davide Fiocco, Giuseppe Foffi, and Srikanth Sastry. Os- cillatory athermal quasi-static deformation of a model glass.Phys. Rev. E, (88):020301(R), 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [5]

    Yielding and mi- crostructure in a 2d jammed material under shear defor- mation.Soft Matter, 9:6222, 2013

    Nathan C Keim and Paulo E Arratia. Yielding and mi- crostructure in a 2d jammed material under shear defor- mation.Soft Matter, 9:6222, 2013

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    Elsen Tjhung and Ludovic Berthier. Criticality and cor- related dynamics at the irreversibility transition in peri- odically driven colloidal suspensions.Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(3):033501, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    Particle-scale reversibility in athermal particulate media below jamming.Physical Review E, 88(5):052205, 2013

    Carl F Schreck, Robert S Hoy, Mark D Shattuck, and Corey S O’Hern. Particle-scale reversibility in athermal particulate media below jamming.Physical Review E, 88(5):052205, 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 59 references
  1. [8]

    Reversible to irreversible transitions in periodic driven many-body systems and future directions for classical and quantum systems.Physical Review Research, 5(2):021001, 2023

    Charles Reichhardt, Ido Regev, K Dahmen, Satoshi Okuma, and Cynthia Jane Olson Reichhardt. Reversible to irreversible transitions in periodic driven many-body systems and future directions for classical and quantum systems.Physical Review Research, 5(2):021001, 2023

    2023

  2. [9]

    Reversible plastic events during oscil- latory deformation of amorphous solids.Physical Review E, 93(1):013001, 2016

    Nikolai V Priezjev. Reversible plastic events during oscil- latory deformation of amorphous solids.Physical Review E, 93(1):013001, 2016

    2016

  3. [10]

    Self-organization, memory, and learning: From driven disordered systems to living matter.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 17, 2025

    Muhittin Mungan, Eric Cl´ ement, Damien Vandem- broucq, and Srikanth Sastry. Self-organization, memory, and learning: From driven disordered systems to living matter.Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 17, 2025

    2025

  4. [11]

    Cort´ e, PM Chaikin, JP Gollub, and DJ Pine

    L. Cort´ e, PM Chaikin, JP Gollub, and DJ Pine. Ran- dom organization in periodically driven systems.Nature Physics, 4(5):420–424, 2008

    2008

  5. [12]

    Chaos and threshold for irreversibility in sheared sus- pensions.Nature, 438(7070):997–1000, 2005

    DJ Pine, JP Gollub, JF Brady, and AM Leshansky. Chaos and threshold for irreversibility in sheared sus- pensions.Nature, 438(7070):997–1000, 2005

    2005

  6. [13]

    Precisely cyclic sand: Self-organization of periodically sheared frictional grains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(1):49–53, 2015

    John R Royer and Paul M Chaikin. Precisely cyclic sand: Self-organization of periodically sheared frictional grains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(1):49–53, 2015

    2015

  7. [14]

    (ir) reversibility in dense granular systems driven by oscillating forces.Soft matter, 2014

    Ronny M¨ obius and Claus Heussinger. (ir) reversibility in dense granular systems driven by oscillating forces.Soft matter, 2014

    2014

  8. [15]

    Slotterback, M

    S. Slotterback, M. Mailman, K. Ronaszegi, M. van Hecke, M. Girvan, and W. Losert. Onset of irreversibility in cyclic shear of granular packings.Physical Review E, 85(2):021309, 2012

    2012

  9. [16]

    Emergent hyperuniformity in periodically driven emulsions.Physical review letters, 115(10):108301, 2015

    Joost H Weijs, Rapha¨ el Jeanneret, R´ emi Dreyfus, and Denis Bartolo. Emergent hyperuniformity in periodically driven emulsions.Physical review letters, 115(10):108301, 2015. 7

    2015

  10. [17]

    Geometrically protected reversibility in hydrodynamic loschmidt-echo experiments.Nature communications, 5, 2014

    Rapha¨ el Jeanneret and Denis Bartolo. Geometrically protected reversibility in hydrodynamic loschmidt-echo experiments.Nature communications, 5, 2014

    2014

  11. [18]

    Mangan, C

    N. Mangan, C. Reichhardt, and C.J.O. Reichhardt. Re- versible to irreversible flow transition in periodically driven vortices.Physical review letters, 100(18):187002, 2008

    2008

  12. [19]

    Yielding and memory in a driven mean-field model of glasses.Physical Review Letters, 135(25):258201, 2025

    Makoto Suda, Edan Lerner, and Eran Bouchbinder. Yielding and memory in a driven mean-field model of glasses.Physical Review Letters, 135(25):258201, 2025

    2025

  13. [20]

    Contact processes in crowded environments.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 88(5):052130, 2013

    S-L-Y Xu and JM Schwarz. Contact processes in crowded environments.Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 88(5):052130, 2013

    2013

  14. [21]

    Mem- ory from coupled instabilities in unfolded crumpled sheets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(28):e2200028119, 2022

    Dor Shohat, Daniel Hexner, and Yoav Lahini. Mem- ory from coupled instabilities in unfolded crumpled sheets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(28):e2200028119, 2022

    2022

  15. [22]

    Mean- field theory of yielding under oscillatory shear.Physical Review Letters, 128(19):198001, 2022

    Jack T Parley, Srikanth Sastry, and Peter Sollich. Mean- field theory of yielding under oscillatory shear.Physical Review Letters, 128(19):198001, 2022

    2022

  16. [23]

    Relationships between structure, memory and flow in sheared disordered materials.Nature Physics, 18(5):565–570, 2022

    KL Galloway, EG Teich, XG Ma, Ch Kammer, IR Gra- ham, NC Keim, C Reina, DJ Jerolmack, AG Yodh, and PE Arratia. Relationships between structure, memory and flow in sheared disordered materials.Nature Physics, 18(5):565–570, 2022

    2022

  17. [24]

    Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter.Reviews of Modern Physics, 89(3):035005, 2017

    Daniel Bonn, Morton M Denn, Ludovic Berthier, Thibaut Divoux, and S´ ebastien Manneville. Yield stress materials in soft condensed matter.Reviews of Modern Physics, 89(3):035005, 2017

    2017

  18. [25]

    Experimental signatures of a nonequilibrium phase transition governing the yielding of a soft glass.Physical Review E, 89(6):062308, 2014

    K Hima Nagamanasa, Shreyas Gokhale, AK Sood, and Rajesh Ganapathy. Experimental signatures of a nonequilibrium phase transition governing the yielding of a soft glass.Physical Review E, 89(6):062308, 2014

    2014

  19. [26]

    Glass stability changes the nature of yielding under oscillatory shear

    Wei-Ting Yeh, Misaki Ozawa, Kunimasa Miyazaki, Takeshi Kawasaki, and Ludovic Berthier. Glass stability changes the nature of yielding under oscillatory shear. Physical review letters, 124(22):225502, 2020

    2020

  20. [27]

    Pallabi Das, HA Vinutha, and Srikanth Sastry. Unified phase diagram of reversible–irreversible, jamming, and yielding transitions in cyclically sheared soft-sphere pack- ings.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(19):10203–10209, 2020

    2020

  21. [28]

    The yielding transition in amorphous solids under oscillatory shear deformation.Nature com- munications, 8(1):1–8, 2017

    Premkumar Leishangthem, Anshul DS Parmar, and Srikanth Sastry. The yielding transition in amorphous solids under oscillatory shear deformation.Nature com- munications, 8(1):1–8, 2017

    2017

  22. [29]

    Mapping out the glassy landscape of a mesoscopic elasto- plastic model.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 157(17), 2022

    Dheeraj Kumar, Sylvain Patinet, Craig E Maloney, Ido Regev, Damien Vandembroucq, and Muhittin Mungan. Mapping out the glassy landscape of a mesoscopic elasto- plastic model.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 157(17), 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Absorbing-state transitions in granular materials close to jamming.Phys- ical review letters, 124(8):088004, 2020

    Christopher Ness and Michael E Cates. Absorbing-state transitions in granular materials close to jamming.Phys- ical review letters, 124(8):088004, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Macroscopic yielding in jammed solids is accompanied by a nonequilib- rium first-order transition in particle trajectories.Phys- ical Review E, 94(2):022615, 2016

    Takeshi Kawasaki and Ludovic Berthier. Macroscopic yielding in jammed solids is accompanied by a nonequilib- rium first-order transition in particle trajectories.Phys- ical Review E, 94(2):022615, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Metastability as a mechanism for yielding in amorphous solids under cyclic shear.Physical review letters, 127(24):248002, 2021

    Muhittin Mungan and Srikanth Sastry. Metastability as a mechanism for yielding in amorphous solids under cyclic shear.Physical review letters, 127(24):248002, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Kantz, T

    H. Kantz, T. Schreiber, and R.S. Mackay.Nonlinear time series analysis, volume 2000. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 1997

    2000

  27. [35]

    Mechanical yield in amorphous solids: a first-order phase transition.arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.02196, 2016

    Prabhat Jaiswal, Itamar Procaccia, Corrado Rainone, and Murari Singh. Mechanical yield in amorphous solids: a first-order phase transition.arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.02196, 2016

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Glass transitions in one-, two-, three-, and four-dimensional binary lennard-jones systems.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21(3):035117, 2009

    Ralf Br¨ uning, Denis A St-Onge, Steve Patterson, and Walter Kob. Glass transitions in one-, two-, three-, and four-dimensional binary lennard-jones systems.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 21(3):035117, 2009

    2009

  29. [37]

    Maloney and A

    C.E. Maloney and A. Lema ˆ ıtre. Amorphous systems in athermal, quasistatic shear.Physical Review E, 74(1):016118, 2006

    2006

  30. [38]

    Ott.Chaos in dynamical systems

    E. Ott.Chaos in dynamical systems. Cambridge univer- sity press, 2002

    2002

  31. [39]

    Vibrational modes identify soft spots in a sheared disordered packing.Phys- ical Review Letters, 107(10):108302, 2011

    M Lisa Manning and Andrea J Liu. Vibrational modes identify soft spots in a sheared disordered packing.Phys- ical Review Letters, 107(10):108302, 2011

    2011

  32. [40]

    Networks and hierarchies: How amorphous materials learn to remember.Physical review letters, 123(17):178002, 2019

    Muhittin Mungan, Srikanth Sastry, Karin Dahmen, and Ido Regev. Networks and hierarchies: How amorphous materials learn to remember.Physical review letters, 123(17):178002, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Dynamics of viscoplastic de- formation in amorphous solids.Physical Review E, 57(6):7192, 1998

    ML Falk and JS Langer. Dynamics of viscoplastic de- formation in amorphous solids.Physical Review E, 57(6):7192, 1998

    1998

  34. [42]

    Critical diffusivity in the reversibility–irreversibility transition of amorphous solids under oscillatory shear.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 31(4):045101, 2019

    Ido Regev and Turab Lookman. Critical diffusivity in the reversibility–irreversibility transition of amorphous solids under oscillatory shear.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 31(4):045101, 2019

    2019

  35. [43]

    Avalanches, thresholds, and diffusion in mesoscale amorphous plasticity.Physical Review E, 100(4):043003, 2019

    Botond Tyukodi, Damien Vandembroucq, and Craig E Maloney. Avalanches, thresholds, and diffusion in mesoscale amorphous plasticity.Physical Review E, 100(4):043003, 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    An introduction to probability theory and its applications, 1958

    William Feller and Philip M Morse. An introduction to probability theory and its applications, 1958

    1958

  37. [45]

    On the density of shear transforma- tions in amorphous solids.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 105(2):26003, 2014

    Jie Lin, Alaa Saade, Edan Lerner, Alberto Rosso, and Matthieu Wyart. On the density of shear transforma- tions in amorphous solids.EPL (Europhysics Letters), 105(2):26003, 2014

    2014

  38. [46]

    Mean-field description of plastic flow in amorphous solids.Physical review X, 6(1):011005, 2016

    Jie Lin and Matthieu Wyart. Mean-field description of plastic flow in amorphous solids.Physical review X, 6(1):011005, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Coopera- tive effects driving the multi-periodic dynamics of cycli- cally sheared amorphous solids.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156(16):164506, 2022

    Asaf Szulc, Muhittin Mungan, and Ido Regev. Coopera- tive effects driving the multi-periodic dynamics of cycli- cally sheared amorphous solids.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 156(16):164506, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Complex path- ways and memory in compressed corrugated sheets

    Hadrien Bense and Martin van Hecke. Complex path- ways and memory in compressed corrugated sheets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50):e2111436118, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Lindeman and Sidney R

    Chloe W. Lindeman and Sidney R. Nagel. Multiple mem- ory formation in glassy landscapes.Science Advances, 7(33):7133, 2021

    2021

  42. [50]

    Keim and Joseph D

    Nathan C. Keim and Joseph D. Paulsen. Multiperiodic orbits from interacting soft spots in cyclically sheared amorphous solids.Science Advances, 7(33):7685, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    Simple unified view of branching pro- cess statistics: Random walks in balanced logarithmic potentials.Physical Review E, 95(3):032115, 2017

    Serena Di Santo, Pablo Villegas, Raffaella Burioni, and Miguel A Mu˜ noz. Simple unified view of branching pro- cess statistics: Random walks in balanced logarithmic potentials.Physical Review E, 95(3):032115, 2017

    2017

  44. [52]

    Probability and random processes

    Geoffrey Grimmett and David Stirzaker. Probability and random processes. 2001. 8

    2001

  45. [53]

    Springer Berlin, 1963

    Theodore Edward Harris et al.The theory of branching processes, volume 6. Springer Berlin, 1963

    1963

  46. [54]

    Lammps-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales.Computer physics commu- nications, 271:108171, 2022

    Aidan P Thompson, H Metin Aktulga, Richard Berger, Dan S Bolintineanu, W Michael Brown, Paul S Crozier, Pieter J In’t Veld, Axel Kohlmeyer, Stan G Moore, Trung Dac Nguyen, et al. Lammps-a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and c...

    2022

  47. [55]

    The computer study of trans- port processes under extreme conditions.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 5(15):1921, 1972

    A W Lees and SF Edwards. The computer study of trans- port processes under extreme conditions.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 5(15):1921, 1972

    1921

  48. [56]

    Bitzek, P

    E. Bitzek, P. Koskinen, F. G¨ ahler, M. Moseler, and P. Gumbsch. Structural relaxation made simple.Physical review letters, 97(17):170201, 2006

    2006

  49. [57]

    Profusion of transition pathways for interacting hysterons.Physical Review E, 104(5):054608, 2021

    Martin van Hecke. Profusion of transition pathways for interacting hysterons.Physical Review E, 104(5):054608, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    The fate of shear-oscillated amorphous solids.The Journal of Chem- ical Physics, 156(10), 2022

    Chen Liu, Ezequiel E Ferrero, Eduardo A Jagla, Kirsten Martens, Alberto Rosso, and Laurent Talon. The fate of shear-oscillated amorphous solids.The Journal of Chem- ical Physics, 156(10), 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    soft spots

    L. Bocquet, A. Colin, and A. Ajdari. Kinetic theory of plastic flow in soft glassy materials.Physical review letters, 103(3):36001, 2009. SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIAL Simulation details Particle based simulations We used LAMMPS [54] to simulate a system of 1000 point particles in...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.