Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 83 references

Investigation of Circular Photon Orbits in Naked Singularity Spacetimes from a Geometric Method

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Naked-singularity spacetimes always have even photon-orbit counts

desk verdict Competent case analysis and a plausible conjecture, but the general proof has two load-bearing gaps and the equal-count claim rests on an unproved transfer. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11456 v1 pith:IQCST5RX submitted 2026-08-11 gr-qc math-phmath.MP

Qing-Rong Xie , Chen-Kai Qiao This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcmath-phmath.MP MSC 83C5783C7553C22 PACS 04.70.-s04.20.-q
keywords CircularPhotonOrbitNakedSingularitySpacetimeOpticalGeometryGeometricCurvaturesSphereGeodesicCurvatureGaussianTopologicalInvariant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that in any static, spherically symmetric spacetime containing a naked singularity but no event horizon, circular photon orbits come in pairs: the total number is $N=2k$ with exactly $k$ stable and $k$ unstable orbits, giving topological invariant $w=n_{\rm stable}-n_{\rm unstable}=0$. It reaches this by studying the geodesic and Gaussian curvatures of the 2-dimensional optical geometry, where circular photon orbits are zeros of the geodesic curvature. The proof covers the three possible limiting behaviors of the metric derivative at the singularity (finite, $-\infty$, $+\infty$), with the $+\infty$ case handled by a dedicated proposition. If correct, the result aligns naked-singularity spacetimes with horizonless compact objects and reinforces that event horizons, not singularities, control the counting of photon orbits.

What carries the argument

The central object is the optical geometry of the spacetime: the two-dimensional Riemannian metric on the equatorial plane, $dt^2 = \frac{g(r)}{f(r)}dr^2 + \frac{r^2}{f(r)}d\phi^2$, obtained by imposing the null condition. In this geometry circular photon orbits are the zeros of the geodesic curvature $\kappa_g(r) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{f(r)g(r)}}\left(\frac{f(r)}{r}-\frac{1}{2}\frac{df}{dr}\right)$, and their stability is read from the Gaussian curvature $K$ via the Cartan-Hadamard theorem ($K<0$ means unstable, $K>0$ means stable). The counting argument combines the positivity of $\kappa_g$ at the naked singularity and at the outer boundary with the alternating distribution property imported from reference [29] (stable and unstable orbits alternate), which turns an even number of zeros into equal counts of stable and unstable orbits and yields $w=0$. Proposition 1 proves that $\kappa_g<0$ throughout a neighborhood of the center would force $df/dr$ to stay bounded, contradicting $\lim_{r\to0}df/dr=+\infty$.

What would settle it

Numerically count the simple zeros of the geodesic curvature $\kappa_g(r)$ computed from Eq. (9) for an explicit spherically symmetric naked-singularity metric satisfying the paper's assumptions (positive $f$ and $g$, $\lim_{r\to0}df/dr=+\infty$, asymptotically flat); an odd number of zeros, or a zero of even multiplicity, would falsify the even-count theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes a counting theorem for circular photon orbits in static, spherically symmetric naked singularity spacetimes: whenever $f(r)>0$ and $g(r)>0$ throughout, so no horizon forms, the equation $\kappa_g(r)=0$ that defines the orbits has either no solution or $N=2k$ solutions, and when orbits exist exactly $k$ are stable and $k$ are unstable, with topological charge $w=0$. The argument splits according to the limiting behavior of $df/dr$ at $r=0$: a finite or $-\infty$ limit makes $\kappa_g\to+\infty$ at the center, while the $+\infty$ case is settled by Proposition 1, which proves $\kappa_g>0$ in a neighborhood of the singularity and thereby forbids an odd number of crossings given the positive outer-boundary behavior. The paper compares this with black hole and regular spacetimes, which have odd $N=2k+1$ and $w=-1$, and with horizonless compact objects, which share the even count and $w=0$, concluding that the number of circular photon orbits is governed primarily by event horizons rather than by spacetime singularities.

Load-bearing premise

The equal split into $k$ stable and $k$ unstable orbits rests on an alternating distribution property derived for black hole spacetimes, which the paper imports by asserting that the Gauss-Bonnet derivation is independent of horizons and singularities, without proving it for domains whose center is a naked singularity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any spherically symmetric naked singularity spacetime that admits at least one circular photon orbit must admit at least two, one stable and one unstable, with topological charge $w=0$.
  • The parity of the photon-orbit count does not care about whether a central singularity is present: naked singularity spacetimes and horizonless compact objects share the same even count $N=2k$.
  • Black hole spacetimes always give an odd count $N=2k+1$ with $w=-1$, so the parity of photon rings is a signature of horizon presence rather than of singularity existence.
  • A stable circular photon orbit in such a spacetime forces a companion unstable orbit, which bears on the stability of horizonless objects against light-ring instabilities.
  • The theorem rules out any naked singularity metric whose geodesic curvature has exactly one simple zero, placing a constraint on admissible metric functions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equal-count conclusion is conditional on the alternating distribution property being valid at a naked singularity; verifying that property directly in a concrete naked-singularity solution would convert the result into a self-contained theorem.
  • A natural extension is to test whether the same even-count rule holds for stationary, axially symmetric naked singularity spacetimes, where the optical geometry becomes Randers-Finsler rather than Riemannian and the present proof does not apply.
  • If the horizons-versus-singularities conclusion is correct, counting photon rings in high-resolution images of compact objects could distinguish horizon spacetimes (odd count) from horizonless ones (even count) without resolving the horizon.
  • Because stable photon orbits are observationally elusive, the even-count theorem may be most testable through the unstable orbits that control shadows and lensing, rather than through direct detection of stable orbits.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies circular photon orbits in static, spherically symmetric naked-singularity spacetimes using the optical-geometry method of Qiao and collaborators. The central claim is that for any such spacetime the total number of circular photon orbits is even, N=2k, with exactly k stable and k unstable orbits, so the topological invariant w=n_stable - n_unstable vanishes. The authors verify the claim for several explicit metric families with divergent f'(r), state Conjecture 1 for the remaining case f'→+∞, and give a purported proof in Section 3.3. They then compare the result with black-hole, regular, and compact-object spacetimes and argue that the presence of an event horizon, rather than a singularity, controls the parity of the number of photon orbits.

Significance. If the universal theorem were correct, it would be a clean and useful classification: horizonless spherically symmetric spacetimes would have even photon-orbit count and zero net topological charge, in agreement with known horizonless compact-object results [1,30]. The geometric curvature computations in Section 3.2 are carried out correctly for the listed metric families, and the equivalence with the effective-potential criterion in Eq. (5) is a helpful cross-check. However, the proof of the universal statement rests on Proposition 1, which is false as stated, and on an alternating-distribution property imported from Ref. [29] without a proof in the naked-singularity setting. Since both the even-count and equal-proportion halves of the headline theorem depend on these unsupported steps, the paper does not establish its main claim.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.3, Proposition 1] Proposition 1 is not merely unproved; it is false under its own hypotheses. The contradiction argument only excludes the possibility that κg(r)<0 on the entire interval (0,δ); it does not establish κg(r)>0 there. A concrete counterexample is f(r)=r^{19/10}(1+(1/5)sin(1/r)) with g(r)=1/f(r). For r>0, f is smooth and positive, and f'(r)=r^{9/10}[(19/10)(1+(1/5)sin(1/r))+(1/5)cos(1/r)]. The bracket is bounded below by 86/50>0, so f'→+∞ as r→0. But using Eq. (9) with fg=1, κg(r)=r^{9/10}[(1/20)(1+(1/5)sin(1/r))-(1/10)cos(1/r)]. This expression takes both signs for r arbitrarily close to 0 (e.g., near sin=-1, cos=1 it is negative; near sin=1, cos=-1 it is positive). Thus the claimed positivity of κg near the naked singularity fails, and the parity argument built on it collapses.
  2. [§3.1 and §3.3, parity argument] The inference that κg(r)>0 at both endpoints implies that κg(r)=0 has an even number of solutions presupposes that every zero is transverse, i.e., that κg changes sign at each root. The manuscript never proves this, and the circular-orbit equation counts all zeros, including tangential ones: a local behavior κg(r)~(r-r0)^2 gives one circular photon orbit while preserving positive endpoint signs. Without a simplicity or transversality argument, the conclusion N=2k is unsupported even if the endpoint signs were established. In addition, the trichotomy lim_{r→0} f'(r)=finite, -∞, or +∞ is not exhaustive for arbitrary smooth f; if f' oscillates without a limit, none of Sections 3.1-3.3 applies to the spacetime, despite the theorem's claim to cover arbitrary spherically symmetric naked-singularity spacetimes.
  3. [Appendix B and §3.1-§3.3, equal-proportion claim] The conclusion n_stable=n_unstable depends entirely on the Alternating Distribution Property imported from Ref. [29]. The paper asserts that the Gauss-Bonnet derivation of that property is independent of horizons and singularities, but no proof is given for domains whose optical metric is singular at r=0. At the naked singularity the optical metric (8) is not controlled, and the boundary term in the Gauss-Bonnet argument may diverge; this is exactly the regime in which the transfer from black-hole spacetimes needs justification. Thus even a proof that N is even would not, within this manuscript, imply equal numbers of stable and unstable orbits.
  4. [Abstract and Section 5, scope of the claimed theorem] The abstract and conclusion state a theorem for 'arbitrary spherically symmetric naked singularity spacetimes' with a 'mathematical proof', but Section 3.2 explicitly labels the general statement as Conjecture 1 before the attempted proof in Section 3.3. The case-by-case results in Section 3.1 cover only the two subclasses where f'(r) has a finite limit or diverges to -∞, and Section 3.2 covers only a list of specific metric ansätze. Because Proposition 1 is false, the proof of Conjecture 1 does not supply the missing generality, and the manuscript does not actually prove the universal claim announced in the abstract.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (13)] The word 'indefinite' describing the limit should be 'indeterminate'.
  2. [Footnote 3] 'In contract' should be 'In contrast'.
  3. [Reference [26]] The journal reference and DOI for Ref. [26] do not match: the article is listed as Phys. Rev. D 106, 084060 (2022) but the DOI points to l021501. Please correct the metadata.
  4. [Abstract and Section 5] Small grammatical issue: 'the number of circular photon geodesics are primarily governed' should be 'is primarily governed'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Equal-proportion claim rests on an asserted transfer of the Alternating Distribution Property from same-group prior work [29]; evenness has an independent proof attempt.

  1. self citation load bearing [Appendix B (Alternating Distribution Property), invoked in Secs. 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 and Sec. 5]
    "reference [29] provides a derivation based on the Gauss-Bonnet theorem, which was originally performed for black hole spacetimes. However, one can see that the detailed procedure of derivation given in reference [29] does not depend on the assumptions concerning spacetime singularities or event horizons. Consequently, this alternating distribution property also holds for naked singularity spacetimes investigated in the present work"

    The equal-proportion part of the headline theorem, 'consisting of k stable orbits and k unstable orbits in equal proportion', is not derived in this paper from the optical-metric equations. It is imported from Ref. [29], a prior paper by the same group, and the only justification for transferring it to naked-singularity spacetimes is the assertion that the Gauss-Bonnet derivation there is independent of horizons and singularities. No proof is supplied here that the boundary terms in that derivation remain controlled when the optical metric is singular at r=0. Thus the stable/unstable count equality, which also fixes the topological invariant w=0, rests on a load-bearing self-citation rather than on an argument contained in this manuscript.

full rationale

The paper is not definitionally circular: Section 2 derives the geodesic and Gaussian curvature formulas from the optical metric, and the stability criterion is cross-checked against the effective potential in Eq. (5). No parameter is fitted and no data are used. The even-total claim N=2k is attempted with the paper's own Proposition 1 and worked examples. The circularity concern is narrower but real: the equal-proportion statement n_stable=n_unstable, part of the headline conclusion, is lifted from Ref. [29] by the same group through the assertion in Appendix B that the Gauss-Bonnet derivation there is independent of horizons and singularities. That transfer is asserted, not proved, and the singular r=0 boundary of the optical metric is exactly where the black-hole derivation's control is not shown to carry over. Therefore the equality of stable and unstable counts is load-bearing self-citation. Separately, Proposition 1 only refutes 'kappa_g(r)<0 throughout a neighborhood'; it does not establish the pointwise positivity kappa_g(r)>0 near r=0 that the parity argument needs, and simple zeros of kappa_g(r)=0 are assumed without proof. These are correctness gaps rather than additional circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities: the paper is analytical. The main burden is four assumptions: regularity/positivity of metric functions, existence of the f' limit, the imported alternating distribution property from the authors' own reference [29], and the unstated simplicity of kappa_g zeros. The first two are standard domain assumptions; the last two are load-bearing for the central theorem and are not independently established in this paper.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption f(r)>0 and g(r)>0 everywhere, and f(r)g(r) is finite and nonvanishing at r=0 and at the cosmological horizon (Sections 3.1, 3.2, Appendix A).
    Used to fix the Lorentzian signature, exclude horizons, and keep the optical metric and volume element well-defined. Not proven for arbitrary naked singularity metrics.
  • domain assumption lim_{r->0} f'(r) exists (finite, +infinity, or -infinity) for the spacetime classification (Section 3).
    The proof of even N does not cover oscillatory f'(r) with no limit, although the abstract claims arbitrary spherically symmetric naked singularity spacetimes.
  • ad hoc to paper Alternating Distribution Property of stable and unstable photon orbits holds for naked singularity spacetimes (Appendix B).
    The paper imports this from reference [29] (same research group) and asserts the Gauss-Bonnet derivation transfers, without proving it for domains with a singular center. This property is required to convert even total count into equal stable/unstable counts.
  • ad hoc to paper Zeros of kappa_g(r) are transverse (not tangential), so the parity argument 'positive at both ends implies even number of zeros' applies (Sections 3.1-3.2).
    A quadratic touch of kappa_g with zero would give a single, non-alternating photon orbit and break the even-count conclusion. The paper never states or proves simplicity of zeros.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Investigation of Circular Photon Orbits in Naked Singularity Spacetimes from a Geometric Method." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IQCST5RX

@misc{pith2026260811456,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Investigation of Circular Photon Orbits in Naked Singularity Spacetimes from a Geometric Method},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IQCST5RX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11456}
}
abstract

Circular photon orbits play a pivotal role in both gravitational theories and astronomical observations. However, the properties of circular photon orbits in naked singularity spacetimes remain insufficiently explored and deserve in-depth investigation. The present work is dedicated to a comprehensive study on the features of circular photon orbits in naked singularity spacetimes. Notably, a geometric approach is employed to investigate these orbits, in which the framework of optical geometry together with its intrinsic curvatures plays crucial roles. We analyze the existence of circular photon orbits through the intrinsic geodesic curvature, and we then investigate the number of stable and unstable circular orbits, as well as the topological invariant associated with circular photon orbits. By examining various classes of naked singularity spacetimes, we obtain a general conclusion regarding circular photon orbits that holds for arbitrary spherically symmetric naked singularity spacetimes: the total number of circular photon orbits is an even integer ($N = 2k$), consisting of $k$ stable orbits and $k$ unstable orbits in equal proportion. A mathematical proof of this conclusion is also provided in the present work. Furthermore, a comparison with other categories of spacetimes reveals that the conclusions regarding the count of circular photon orbits in naked singularity spacetimes agree with those obtained for compact object spacetimes without naked singularities, indicating that the number of circular photon geodesics is primarily governed by the presence of event horizons rather than spacetime singularities. Keywords: Circular Photon Orbit, Naked Singularity Spacetime, Optical Geometry, Geometric Curvatures

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Physical Review Letters119(25), 251102 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.119.251102

    Cunha, P.V.P., Berti, E., Herdeiro, C.A.R.: Light-ring stability for ultracompact objects. Physical Review Letters119(25), 251102 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.119.251102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.251102 2017

  2. [2]

    Physical Review Letters 124(18), 181101 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.124.181101

    Cunha, P.V.P., Herdeiro, C.A.R.: Stationary black holes and light rings. Physical Review Letters 124(18), 181101 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.124.181101

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.181101 2020

  3. [3]

    Physical Review D102(6), 064039 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.064039

    Wei, S.-W.: Topological charge and black hole photon spheres. Physical Review D102(6), 064039 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.064039

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.064039 2020

  4. [4]

    Physical Review Letters130(6), 061401 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevlett.130.061401

    Cunha, P.V.P., Herdeiro, C., Radu, E., Sanchis-Gual, N.: Exotic compact objects and the fate of the light-ring instability. Physical Review Letters130(6), 061401 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevlett.130.061401

    2023

  5. [5]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: First m87 event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the supermassive black hole. The Astrophysical Journal Letters875(1), 1 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    2019

  6. [6]

    The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: First m87 event horizon telescope results. iv. imaging the central supermassive black hole. The Astrophysical Journal Letters875(1), 4 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0e85 2019

  7. [7]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration: First sagittarius a* event horizon telescope results. i. the shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the milky way. The Astrophysical Journal Letters930(2), 12 (2022) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674 2022

  8. [8]

    Physical Review D100(2), 024018 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.100.024018

    Gralla, S.E., Holz, D.E., Wald, R.M.: Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings. Physical Review D100(2), 024018 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.100.024018

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.024018 2019

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Physics Reports 947, 1–39 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.004

    Perlick, V., Tsupko, O.Y.: Calculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studies. Physics Reports 947, 1–39 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.004

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity40(16), 165007 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/acd97b

    Vagnozzi, S., Roy, R., Tsai, Y.-D., Visinelli, L., Afrin, M., Allahyari, A., Bambhaniya, P., Dey, D., 15 Ghosh, S.G., Joshi, P.S., Jusufi, K., Khodadi, M., Walia, R.K., ¨Ovg¨ un, A., Bambi, C.: Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the event hori...

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy66(6), 260401 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-2059-5

    Chen, S., Jing, J., Qian, W.-L., Wang, B.: Black hole images: A review. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy66(6), 260401 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-2059-5

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2013(11), 063–063 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2013/11/063

    Wei, S.-W., Liu, Y.-X.: Observing the shadow of einstein-maxwell-dilaton-axion black hole. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2013(11), 063–063 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/ 2013/11/063

    2013 doi

  5. [13]

    Physical Review D62(8), 084003 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.62.084003

    Virbhadra, K.S., Ellis, G.F.R.: Schwarzschild black hole lensing. Physical Review D62(8), 084003 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.62.084003

    2000 doi

  6. [14]

    Physical Review D66(10), 103001 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.66.103001

    Bozza, V.: Gravitational lensing in the strong field limit. Physical Review D66(10), 103001 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.66.103001

    2002 doi

  7. [15]

    General Relativity and Gravitation39(10), 1563–1582 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10714-007-0481-8

    Iyer, S.V., Petters, A.O.: Light’s bending angle due to black holes: from the photon sphere to infinity. General Relativity and Gravitation39(10), 1563–1582 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10714-007-0481-8

    2007

  8. [16]

    Physical Review D95(6), 064035 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevd.95.064035

    Tsukamoto, N.: Deflection angle in the strong deflection limit in a general asymptotically flat, static, spherically symmetric spacetime. Physical Review D95(6), 064035 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevd.95.064035

    2017

  9. [17]

    Physical Review D79(6), 064016 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79

    Cardoso, V., Miranda, A.S., Berti, E., Witek, H., Zanchin, V.T.: Geodesic stability, lyapunov exponents, and quasinormal modes. Physical Review D79(6), 064016 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79. 064016

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    Physical Review D90(4), 044069 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.90.044069

    Cardoso, V., Crispino, L.C.B., Macedo, C.F.B., Okawa, H., Pani, P.: Light rings as observational evi- dence for event horizons: Long-lived modes, ergoregions and nonlinear instabilities of ultracompact objects. Physical Review D90(4), 044069 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/phys...

    2014 doi

  11. [19]

    Physical Review D86(10), 104006 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.104006

    Yang, H., Nichols, D.A., Zhang, F., Zimmerman, A., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y.: Quasinormal-mode spectrum of kerr black holes and its geometric interpretation. Physical Review D86(10), 104006 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.104006

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    Physical Review D104(8), 084044 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.104.084044

    Li, P.-C., Lee, T.-C., Guo, M., Chen, B.: Correspondence of eikonal quasinormal modes and unstable fundamental photon orbits for a kerr-newman black hole. Physical Review D104(8), 084044 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.104.084044

    2021 doi

  13. [21]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021)

    Hartle, J.B.: Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein’s General Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2021). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042604

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    General Relativity and Gravitation50(4), 42 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9

    Cunha, P.V.P., Herdeiro, C.A.R.: Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review. General Relativity and Gravitation50(4), 42 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Physical Review D107(6), 064006 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.064006

    Wei, S.-W., Liu, Y.-X.: Topology of equatorial timelike circular orbits around stationary black holes. Physical Review D107(6), 064006 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.064006

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Physics Letters B, 140712 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140712

    Chen, J.-L., Wu, S.-P., Wei, S.-W.: The universal topological charge of black hole photon spheres in higher dimensions. Physics Letters B, 140712 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140712

    2026

  17. [25]

    https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.07232

    Deich, A., Yunes, N., Gammie, C.: Lyapunov Exponents to Test General Relativity (2024). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.07232 . https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07232

    2024 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    Physical Review D106(2), 084060 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.106.l021501

    Qiao, C.-K., Li, M.: Geometric approach to circular photon orbits and black hole shadows. Physical Review D106(2), 084060 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.106.l021501

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Physical Review D106(8), 084060 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.106.084060

    Qiao, C.-K.: Curvatures, photon spheres, and black hole shadows. Physical Review D106(8), 084060 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.106.084060

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.20802

    Qiao, C., Li, M., Xie, D., Guo, M.: Geometric Approach to Light Rings in Axially Symmetric Spacetimes (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.20802

    2025 doi

  21. [31]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity39(22), 225007 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac987e 16

    Cunha, P.V., Herdeiro, C.A., Novo, J.P.: Null and timelike circular orbits from equivalent 2d metrics. Classical and Quantum Gravity39(22), 225007 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac987e 16

    2022 doi

  22. [32]

    Physical Review D111(6), 064001 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.064001

    Berm´ udez-C´ ardenas, B., Lasso Andino, O.: Massive particle surfaces, partial umbilicity, and circular orbits. Physical Review D111(6), 064001 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.064001

    2025 doi

  23. [33]

    The European Physical Journal C85(11), 1266 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-15009-9

    Berm´ udez-C´ ardenas, B., Andino, O.L.: Massive particle surfaces and black hole shadows from intrin- sic curvature. The European Physical Journal C85(11), 1266 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-15009-9

    2025 doi

  24. [34]

    The European Physical Journal C85(3), 299 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14046-8

    Gallo, E., M¨ adler, T.: Bounds for lyapunov exponent of circular light orbits in black holes. The European Physical Journal C85(3), 299 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14046-8

    2025 doi

  25. [35]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.05103

    Zhang, S.-H., Zhao, Z.-Q., Li, Z.-Y., Zhang, J.-F., Zhang, X.: Gaussian curvature and Lyapunov exponent as probes of black hole phase transitions (2026). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.05103

    2026 doi arXiv

  26. [36]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606

    Andino, O.L., Veloz, F.G.: A perturbative geometric approach for photon spheres, massive particle surfaces and black hole shadows with mass variations (2026). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606. 00456

    2026 doi

  27. [37]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04236

    Zhang, S.-H., Li, Z.-Y., Zhang, J.-F., Zhang, X.: Geometric unification of timelike orbital chaos and phase transitions in black holes (2026). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04236

    2026 doi

  28. [38]

    Physical Review D96(2), 024039 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024039

    Cunha, P.V., Herdeiro, C.A., Radu, E.: Fundamental photon orbits: black hole shadows and spacetime instabilities. Physical Review D96(2), 024039 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024039

    2017 doi

  29. [39]

    Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics42(2), 818–838 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1308507

    Claudel, C.-M., Virbhadra, K.S., Ellis, G.F.R.: The geometry of photon surfaces. Journal of Mathemat- ical Physics42(2), 818–838 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1308507

    2001 doi

  30. [40]

    Physical Review D107(12), 124037 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.124037

    Guo, G., Lu, Y., Wang, P., Wu, H., Yang, H.: Black holes with multiple photon spheres. Physical Review D107(12), 124037 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.107.124037

    2023 doi

  31. [41]

    Physical Review D94(10), 106005 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd

    Cvetic, M., Gibbons, G.W., Pope, C.N.: Photon spheres and sonic horizons in black holes from super- gravity and other theories. Physical Review D94(10), 106005 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd. 94.106005

    2016 doi

  32. [42]

    Physical Review D 109(12), 124065 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.124065

    Xavier, S.V., Herdeiro, C.A., Crispino, L.C.: Traversable wormholes and light rings. Physical Review D 109(12), 124065 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.124065

    2024 doi

  33. [43]

    Physics Letters B727(1-3), 345–348 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.047

    Hod, S.: Upper bound on the radii of black-hole photonspheres. Physics Letters B727(1-3), 345–348 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.047

    2013 doi

  34. [44]

    Physical Review D99(10), 104080 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevd.99.104080

    Mishra, A.K., Chakraborty, S., Sarkar, S.: Understanding photon sphere and black hole shadow in dynamically evolving spacetimes. Physical Review D99(10), 104080 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevd.99.104080

    2019

  35. [45]

    The European Physical Journal C85(9), 981 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-025-14727-4

    Song, Y., Fu, J., Cen, Y.: The existence and upper bound for stable photon spheres in static spherically symmetric black holes. The European Physical Journal C85(9), 981 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-025-14727-4

    2025

  36. [46]

    The European Physical Journal C86(4), 413 (2026) https://doi.org/10

    Song, Y., Fu, J., Cen, Y.: Bounds on the photon sphere radius for spherically symmetric black holes in n-dimensional einstein gravity. The European Physical Journal C86(4), 413 (2026) https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjc/s10052-026-15623-1

    2026

  37. [47]

    Physics of the Dark Universe, 102209 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025

    Li, L.-Y., Liu, X.-Y., Cai, R.-G., Gong, Y., Zhou, W.: Images and photo regions of continuous photon sphere spacetime. Physics of the Dark Universe, 102209 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025. 102209

    2025 doi

  38. [48]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01916

    Diaz-Guerra, D., Rincon, A., Rubiera-Garcia, D.: Photon spheres in dynamical space-times (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.01916

    2026 arXiv

  39. [49]

    Physics of the Dark Universe45, 101541 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101541

    Vertogradov, V., ¨Ovg¨ un, A.: Analyzing the influence of geometrical deformation on photon sphere and shadow radius: A new analytical approach — spherically symmetric spacetimes. Physics of the Dark Universe45, 101541 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101541

    2024

  40. [50]

    Physics Letters B854, 138758 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138758

    Vertogradov, V., ¨Ovg¨ un, A.: General approach on shadow radius and photon spheres in asymptotically flat spacetimes and the impact of mass-dependent variations. Physics Letters B854, 138758 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138758

    2024

  41. [51]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(05), 029 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/029

    Ara´ ujo Filho, A.A., Reis, J.A.A.S., Hassanabadi, H.: Exploring antisymmetric tensor effects on black hole shadows and quasinormal frequencies. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(05), 029 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/05/029

    2024 doi

  42. [52]

    Physics of the Dark Universe47, 101815 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101815 17

    Heidari, N., Ara´ ujo Filho, A.A., Pantig, R.C., ¨Ovg¨ un, A.: Absorption, scattering, geodesics, shadows and lensing phenomena of black holes in effective quantum gravity. Physics of the Dark Universe47, 101815 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101815 17

    2025

  43. [53]

    Communi- cations in Analysis and Geometry25(2), 303–320 (2017) https://doi.org/10.4310/CAG.2017.v25.n2

    Cederbaum, C., Galloway, G.J.: Uniqueness of photon spheres via positive mass rigidity. Communi- cations in Analysis and Geometry25(2), 303–320 (2017) https://doi.org/10.4310/CAG.2017.v25.n2. a2

    2017 doi

  44. [54]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity33(7), 075006 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/7/075006

    Cederbaum, C., Galloway, G.J.: Uniqueness of photon spheres in electro-vacuum spacetimes. Classical and Quantum Gravity33(7), 075006 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/7/075006

    2016 doi

  45. [55]

    General Relativity and Gravitation50(2), 17 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-017-2337-1

    Jia, J., Liu, J., Liu, X., Mo, Z., Pang, X., Wang, Y., Yang, N.: Existence and stability of circular orbits in general static and spherically symmetric spacetimes. General Relativity and Gravitation50(2), 17 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-017-2337-1

    2018 doi

  46. [56]

    General Relativity and Gravitation50(4), 41 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2364-6

    Jia, J., Pang, X., Yang, N.: Existence and stability of circular orbits in static and axisymmetric space- times. General Relativity and Gravitation50(4), 41 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2364-6

    2018 doi

  47. [57]

    Physical Review D103(10), 104031 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.103.104031

    Guo, M., Gao, S.: Universal properties of light rings for stationary axisymmetric spacetimes. Physical Review D103(10), 104031 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.103.104031

    2021 doi

  48. [58]

    Physical Review D104(4), 044019 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.104.044019

    Ghosh, R., Sarkar, S.: Light rings of stationary spacetimes. Physical Review D104(4), 044019 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.104.044019

    2021 doi

  49. [59]

    Annals of Mathematics140(3), 607–653 (1994) https://doi.org/10.2307/2118619

    Christodoulou, D.: Examples of naked singularity formation in the gravitational collapse of a scalar field. Annals of Mathematics140(3), 607–653 (1994) https://doi.org/10.2307/2118619

    1994 doi

  50. [60]

    Physical Review D102(2), 024022 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024022

    Joshi, A.B., Dey, D., Joshi, P.S., Bambhaniya, P.: Shadow of a naked singularity without photon sphere. Physical Review D102(2), 024022 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024022

    2020 doi

  51. [61]

    General Relativity and Gravitation43(11), 2943–2963 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1216-4

    Ziaie, A.H., Atazadeh, K., Rasouli, S.M.M.: Naked singularity formation in f(r) gravity. General Relativity and Gravitation43(11), 2943–2963 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-011-1216-4

    2011 doi

  52. [62]

    International Journal of Modern Physics D20(14), 2641–2729 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1142/ s0218271811020792

    JOSHI, P.S., MALAFARINA, D.: Recent developments in gravitational collapse and spacetime singu- larities. International Journal of Modern Physics D20(14), 2641–2729 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1142/ s0218271811020792

    2011

  53. [63]

    Physical Review D65(10), 103004 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.103004

    Virbhadra, K.S., Ellis, G.F.: Gravitational lensing by naked singularities. Physical Review D65(10), 103004 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.103004

    2002 doi

  54. [64]

    Chinese Physics C48(10), 105103 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1674-1137/ad5660

    Wang, M., Guo, G., Yan, P., Chen, S., Jing, J.: The ring-shaped shadow of a rotating naked singularity with a complete photon sphere. Chinese Physics C48(10), 105103 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1674-1137/ad5660

    2024

  55. [65]

    Journal of Modern Optics55(7), 1119–1126 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340701618395

    Ye, X.-H., Lin, Q.: A simple optical analysis of gravitational lensing. Journal of Modern Optics55(7), 1119–1126 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340701618395

    2008 doi

  56. [66]

    Nuclear Physics B1010, 116744 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116744

    Piwnik, J., Gonera, J., Kosinski, P.: Fermat’s principle in general relativity via herglotz variational formalism. Nuclear Physics B1010, 116744 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116744

    2025

  57. [67]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity25(23), 235009 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/25/23/ 235009

    Gibbons, G.W., Werner, M.C.: Applications of the gauss-bonnet theorem to gravitational lensing. Classical and Quantum Gravity25(23), 235009 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/25/23/ 235009

    2008 doi

  58. [68]

    Physical Review D79(6), 064031 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79.064031

    Gibbons, G.W., Warnick, C.M.: Universal properties of the near-horizon optical geometry. Physical Review D79(6), 064031 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79.064031

    2009 doi

  59. [69]

    Physical Review D79(4) (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79.044022

    Gibbons, G.W., Herdeiro, C.A.R., Warnick, C.M., Werner, M.C.: Stationary metrics and optical zermelo- randers-finsler geometry. Physical Review D79(4) (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.79.044022

    2009 doi

  60. [70]

    General Relativity and Gravitation44(12), 3047–3057 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-012-1458-9

    Werner, M.C.: Gravitational lensing in the kerr-randers optical geometry. General Relativity and Gravitation44(12), 3047–3057 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-012-1458-9

    2012 doi

  61. [71]

    Physical Review D94(8), 084015 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/physrevd.94.084015

    Ishihara, A., Suzuki, Y., Ono, T., Kitamura, T., Asada, H.: Gravitational bending angle of light for finite distance and the gauss-bonnet theorem. Physical Review D94(8), 084015 (2016) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/physrevd.94.084015

    2016 doi

  62. [72]

    Physical Review D95(4), 044017 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/physrevd.95.044017

    Ishihara, A., Suzuki, Y., Ono, T., Asada, H.: Finite-distance corrections to the gravitational bending angle of light in the strong deflection limit. Physical Review D95(4), 044017 (2017) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/physrevd.95.044017

    2017 doi

  63. [73]

    Physical Review D96(10), 104037 (2017) https://doi.org/10

    Ono, T., Ishihara, A., Asada, H.: Gravitomagnetic bending angle of light with finite-distance corrections in stationary axisymmetric spacetimes. Physical Review D96(10), 104037 (2017) https://doi.org/10. 1103/physrevd.96.104037

    2017

  64. [74]

    Universe 5(11), 218 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5110218

    Ono, T., Asada, H.: The effects of finite distance on the gravitational deflection angle of light. Universe 5(11), 218 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5110218

    2019 doi

  65. [75]

    Physical Review D101(12) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.101.124058 18

    Li, Z., Zhang, G., ¨Ovg¨ un, A.: Circular orbit of a particle and weak gravitational lensing. Physical Review D101(12) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.101.124058 18

    2020 doi

  66. [76]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(01), 013 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/ 01/013

    Huang, Y., Cao, Z., Lu, Z.: Generalized gibbons-werner method for stationary spacetimes. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024(01), 013 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/ 01/013

    2024 doi

  67. [77]

    https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.17355

    Basumallick, P.P., Das, S., Mandal, B., Sau, S.: Weak Gravitational Lensing: A Brief Overview (2026). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.17355

    2026 doi arXiv

  68. [78]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity43(8), 085011 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ae5d7b

    ¨Ovg¨ un, A., Pantig, R.C.: Boundary-only weak deflection angles from isothermal optical geometry. Classical and Quantum Gravity43(8), 085011 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ae5d7b

    2026 doi

  69. [79]

    Springer, New York (2012)

    Berger, M., Gostiaux, B.: Differential Geometry: Manifolds, Curves, and Surfaces: Manifolds, Curves, and Surfaces. Springer, New York (2012)

    2012

  70. [80]

    Courier Dover Publications, Mineola, New York (2016)

    Do Carmo, M.P.: Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces: Revised and Updated Second Edition. Courier Dover Publications, Mineola, New York (2016)

    2016

  71. [81]

    Texts and Readings in Mathematics, vol

    Tao, T.: Analysis. Texts and Readings in Mathematics, vol. 2. Springer, Singapore (2022). https://doi. org/10.1007/978-981-19-7261-4

    2022 doi

  72. [82]

    Pang, X.-C., Wu, W., Chai, J., Dai, H.-H.: Mathematical Analysis (5th Edition) vol. 5. Higher Education Press, Beijing (2019)

    2019

  73. [83]

    Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics

    Hawking, S.W., Ellis, G.F.R.: The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time: 50th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2023). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009253161

    2023 doi

  74. [84]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Hawking, S.W., Penrose, R.: The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences314(1519), 529–548 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1970.0021

    1970

  75. [85]

    General Relativity and Gravitation30(5), 701–848 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018801101244 19

    Senovilla, J.M.: Singularity theorems and their consequences. General Relativity and Gravitation30(5), 701–848 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018801101244 19

    1998 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.