Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 28 references

Uniformly Stable Minimal Weyl--Heisenberg Measurements Approaching the SIC Benchmark

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Explicit finite-field measurements are shown to approach SIC-level stability without assuming SICs exist.

desk verdict A solid, explicit construction with closed-form spectra that gives an unconditional near-SIC stability floor in finite-field dimensions; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.11850 v1 pith:MRPSUCVK submitted 2026-08-12 quant-ph cs.ITmath.IT

Xiuwu Zhu , Yu Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcs.ITmath.IT
keywords Weyl–HeisenbergmeasurementsinformationallycompletePOVMsspectralstabilitySICbenchmarkAlltopstatesfinite-fieldquadraticGausssumsquantumtomographyclassicalshadows
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks how well-conditioned a minimal quantum measurement can be made without assuming that an exact symmetric informationally complete (SIC) measurement exists. For every prime-power dimension $q=p^r$ with $p\ge 5$, it constructs an explicit Weyl–Heisenberg fiducial—a balanced one-coordinate perturbation of a cubic Alltop state—whose nonidentity projector-Gram spectrum lies in a short interval $[L_q,U_q]$ with $L_q\ge 0.1979$ and $U_q/L_q\to 1$. The SIC-normalized minimum $\eta(\phi_q)$ tends to $1$, and the attained floor $\lambda(\phi_q)$ tends to the global finite-field Weyl–Heisenberg max–min optimum $\Lambda_q^\star$, all without assuming SIC existence. If the paper is right, this gives explicit, dimension-uniformly stable minimal informationally complete measurements whose full error spectrum asymptotically matches the SIC benchmark, including the exact finite-sample tomographic error at the maximally mixed state.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the balanced-Alltop fiducial $|\phi_q\rangle=(|A_q\rangle+t_q|0\rangle)/\sqrt{N_{q,t_q}}$, where $|A_q\rangle=q^{-1/2}\sum_{x\in\mathbb{F}_q}\psi(x^3)|x\rangle$ is the cubic Alltop state. The Alltop ambiguity profile $|\chi_{A_q}(a,b)|$ is exactly $q^{-1/2}$ for every $a\neq 0$ and zero on the axis $a=0$, $b\neq 0$; the finite-field quadratic Gauss-sum identity is what makes this profile exact. The one-coordinate spike repairs the zero axis, and the balance equation $\sqrt{q}\,t^2+4t=1$ (equivalently $t_q\sim q^{-1/4}$) equalizes the two competing scales—linear bulk distortion versus quadratic repaired-axis amplitude. The spectral theorem for Weyl–Heisenberg projector Gram matrices, $G_\phi|f_{m,n}\rangle = q|\chi_\phi(-n,m)|^2|f_{m,n}\rangle$, then converts the repaired ambiguity profile into the interval $[L_q,U_q]$ and identifies the exact floor $\lambda(\phi_q)=L_q$.

What would settle it

Construct the full nonidentity projector-Gram spectrum of $|\phi_q\rangle$ by exact arithmetic for $q=5$, $q=7$, and $q=25$, either by direct diagonalization or from the closed formula in the paper's Appendix F. Theorem 11 predicts that the minimum eigenvalue equals $L_q$, that every off-axis eigenvalue lies in $[L_q,U_q]$, and that the multiplicity of $L_q$ is at least $q-1$; a single off-axis eigenvalue below $L_q$, or a computed minimum different from $L_q$, would refute the exact-floor claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that spectral flatness, not just completeness, can be achieved by an explicit construction. The unperturbed cubic Alltop state over $\mathbb{F}_q$ has ambiguity profile exactly flat at magnitude $q^{-1/2}$ except for one zero axis, so its Weyl–Heisenberg orbit is incomplete; adding a spike $t|0\rangle$ repairs that axis. The paper shows that choosing $t_q\sim q^{-1/4}$ balances the repaired-axis amplitude against the distortion of the flat bulk, producing a fiducial $\phi_q$ whose smallest nonidentity projector-Gram eigenvalue equals the certified bound $L_q$, with the whole nonidentity spectrum confined to $[L_q,U_q]$. Consequently $\eta(\phi_q)=(q+1)\lambda(\phi_q)/q\to 1$ and $\lambda(\phi_q)/\Lambda_q^\star\to 1$, where $\Lambda_q^\star$ is the maximum over all normalized finite-field Weyl–Heisenberg fiducials, and this asymptotic optimality is unconditional on SIC existence. The paper also organizes explicit constructions into a hierarchy: polynomial floors $\Theta(d^{-3})$ and $\Theta(d^{-5})$ in cyclic dimensions, a uniform floor $\lambda\ge 4/9$ in characteristic two, and the near-SIC interval in characteristic at least five.

Load-bearing premise

All the main claims depend on an exact identity for quadratic exponential sums over finite fields; if that identity degenerates or holds only approximately, the flatness the construction repairs—and with it the certified interval $[L_q,U_q]$ and the equality $\lambda(\phi_q)=L_q$—would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every prime-power dimension $q=p^r$ with $p\ge 5$, there is an explicit minimal $q^2$-outcome informationally complete POVM whose nonidentity spectrum is asymptotically isotropic: $U_q/L_q\to 1$ and the traceless condition number tends to $1$.
  • At the maximally mixed state, canonical linear inversion has finite-sample Hilbert–Schmidt mean-squared error ratio $R(\phi_q)$ between $d/((d+1)U_q)$ and $d/((d+1)L_q)$, and both endpoints tend to $1$, so the explicit construction asymptotically matches the SIC inversion error.
  • The worst-direction local Fisher information at $I/d$, normalized by the SIC value, is $\eta(\phi_q)\to 1$, meaning no traceless parameter direction is asymptotically harder to estimate than in a SIC.
  • Canonical classical-shadow estimators of $K$ observables achieve target accuracy with sample complexity proportional to $(d+1)/\eta(\phi_q)$, and the universal overhead $\eta^{-1}$ is bounded by a dimension-independent constant for this family.
  • The characteristic-two family covers every multi-qubit dimension with uniform floor $\lambda\ge 4/9$, and at $q=2$ and $q=8$ it reaches the finite-field SIC endpoint exactly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: The zero-axis repair in Lemma 10 is stated abstractly for any flat-profile phase state, so the same one-coordinate perturbation could be tried on other Alltop-type profiles, with a different balance scale; the paper only suggests this direction.
  • Inference: Because characteristic 3 is excluded only by the degeneracy of the quadratic Gauss sum, a separate construction for $q=3^r$ is the natural missing piece of the prime-power picture; the cubic mechanism cannot be transplanted there as proven.
  • Inference: The limit $\lambda(\phi_q)/\Lambda_q^\star\to 1$ suggests that in these dimensions the finite-field max–min problem is nearly solved by an explicit non-symmetric construction; whether the finite-$q$ optimum is attained only at an exact SIC remains open.
  • Inference: The near-isotropy of the full spectrum suggests that error bounds away from the maximally mixed state might also approach SIC-level performance, but the paper does not establish state-dependent bounds beyond $\rho=I/q$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the spectral stability of minimal rank-one Weyl–Heisenberg (WH) measurements, quantified by the smallest nonidentity eigenvalue λ of the projector-Gram matrix. It proves several explicit constructions: a Haar-generic instability result (E[λ^{-1}]=∞), a cyclic family with polynomial floors Θ(d^{-3}) in odd and Θ(d^{-5}) in even dimensions, a characteristic-two finite-field family with uniform λ≥4/9, and the main result: for every prime power q=p^r with p≥5, a balanced one-coordinate perturbation of the cubic Alltop state yields a fiducial whose nonidentity spectrum lies in [L_q,U_q] with L_q≥L_5≈0.1979, U_q/L_q→1, η(φ_q)→1, and λ(φ_q)/Λ*_q→1, all without assuming SIC existence. Exact finite-sample Hilbert–Schmidt MSE, canonical-shadow bounds, and Fisher-efficiency relations are derived from the spectrum.

Significance. The main theorem is a genuinely significant contribution: it gives an explicit unconditional family of minimal WH measurements whose spectral floor approaches the SIC max–min benchmark in finite-field dimensions. The proofs are self-contained, the load-bearing Gauss-sum flatness is standard and exactly satisfied, and no numerical optimization or SIC-existence assumption enters. The characteristic-two and cyclic results are also exact and supply useful intermediate benchmarks. The operational corollaries (canonical MSE, Fisher efficiency, shadow bounds) follow directly from the spectral information and are clearly scoped. If the results stand as written, this substantially advances the quantitative design of informationally complete measurements.

minor comments (4)
  1. [III C (Eq. 94)] The identity N_q = 1 + a_q/s in Eq. (94) is stated without derivation; it follows from the balance equation s t^2 + 4t = 1 and deserves a one-line explanation.
  2. [References] The DOI "10.1103/wkj6-l7bf" in Ref. [8] appears to be a placeholder and should be corrected before publication.
  3. [Appendix D] In the sharpness argument for the even-dimensional cyclic family, the case d=4 is not explicitly handled; the sentence saying the bound follows trivially from λ≤d/(d+1) is correct, but a direct check for d=4 would improve readability.
  4. [V (Fig. 1 captions)] The caption of Fig. 1(c) states "Exact balanced-spike formula"; I suggest clarifying that the plotted curve is the proven attained floor L_q, not a numerical estimate, to match the theorem statements.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main spectral bounds and optimality claims are derived from standard finite-field Gauss sums, exact expansions, and elementary inequalities, with no fitted quantity renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs. Theorem 11's equality lambda(phi_q) = L_q is not definitional: L_q is the crossing point of the exact repaired-axis amplitude (Lemma 10, Eq. 83) and the triangle-inequality lower bound for all off-axis directions (Eq. 84). The off-axis bound is proved for every nonzero a and all b, independent of the value of t, and the axis value is obtained by direct expansion; the balancing condition (Eq. 88) merely makes the certified lower bound optimal. The paper explicitly states that t_q optimizes the analytic lower bound and "does not assert that t_q is the exact finite-q optimizer of the true minimum," which is the opposite of fitting a parameter and then calling it a prediction. The residual claims also do not rely on circular self-citation. Lemma 9's flat Alltop profile follows from the standard finite-field quadratic Gauss sum identity, quoted here as Eq. (F7) with reference [22]; this is an external, parameter-free algebraic fact and not a consequence of the paper's results. The asymptotic optimality squeeze L_q <= Lambda*_q <= q/(q+1) uses Proposition 2, which follows from the Moyal sum identity and applies to every normalized WH fiducial; it is independent of the balanced-Alltop construction. Thus lambda(phi_q)/Lambda*_q -> 1 is a genuine consequence of two-sided bounds, not a restatement of the definition of the perturbed fiducial. The characteristic-two construction (Theorem 8) is also an exact analytic spectrum derived from closed-form ambiguity branches, with no numerical fitting. The single potentially self-referential citation, Ref. [16] (whose authors include Y. Wang), is used only to acknowledge earlier covariant/dynamical-tomography criteria and plays no load-bearing role in any proof. The paper also honestly records its limitations: characteristic three is left open, the spike is not claimed to be the global finite-q optimizer, and the characteristic-two family is not claimed to be efficiently implementable. No step in the derivation chain is equivalent by construction to an input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the balanced-Alltop and characteristic-two fiducials are mathematical constructions within the existing Weyl-Heisenberg framework. Free parameters are analytic choices with closed forms, not data fits.

free parameters (2)
  • t_q (balanced-Alltop perturbation amplitude) = 1/(sqrt(4+sqrt(q))+2), asymptotic q^{-1/4}-2q^{-1/2}+O(q^{-3/4})
    A construction parameter fixed by the analytic balance condition between the repaired-axis amplitude and the bulk distortion; not fitted to data.
  • theta_q (characteristic-two spike phase) = 5pi/12 for q=2, 2pi/3 for q=4, 3pi/4 for q>=8
    Chosen by hand for the characteristic-two family to equalize the spectral branches and maximize the floor; no data fitting.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Finite-field quadratic Gauss sum identity
    Used in Lemma 9 and Appendix F to prove Alltop flatness and the closed-form off-axis spectrum; cited to Lidl-Niederreiter Chapter 5 and not proved in the paper.
  • standard math Additive character orthogonality and Weyl commutation relations for Weyl-Heisenberg operators
    Used throughout to derive the spectral dictionary and the Moyal sum; standard background.
  • standard math Beta and coarea density estimates for uniform simplex projections
    Used in Theorem 5 and Appendix C to show the Haar inverse eigenvalue has infinite expectation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniformly Stable Minimal Weyl--Heisenberg Measurements Approaching the SIC Benchmark." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MRPSUCVK

@misc{pith2026260811850,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniformly Stable Minimal Weyl--Heisenberg Measurements Approaching the SIC Benchmark},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MRPSUCVK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.11850}
}
abstract

Informational completeness (IC) guarantees that an inverse exists, not that it is statistically well conditioned. For minimal rank-one Weyl--Heisenberg (WH) measurements, covariance makes the nonidentity projector-Gram spectrum proportional to the fiducial's ambiguity intensities, with eigenvalues \(d|\chi_\phi(u)|^2\), turning stability into an explicit worst-direction design problem; write \(\lambda\) for its smallest nonidentity eigenvalue. Haar fiducials are IC almost surely while \(\mathbb E[\lambda^{-1}]=\infty\), and an explicit geometric family used to establish balanced informationally complete measurements in every dimension has a normalized spectral floor bounded above by an exponentially decaying envelope. We then construct a hierarchy of minimal measurements. A cyclic family with exactly \(d^2\) outcomes in every integer dimension has floors \(\Theta(d^{-3})\) for odd \(d\) and \(\Theta(d^{-5})\) for even \(d\); a finite-field family for \(q=2^m\) obeys the uniform bound \(\lambda\ge4/9\). Our main result treats every prime-power dimension of characteristic \(p\ge5\). A balanced one-coordinate perturbation repairs the zero ambiguity axis of a cubic Alltop state, gives an attained floor uniformly bounded below by a positive constant, and confines the entire nonidentity spectrum to \([L_q,U_q]\) with \(U_q/L_q\to1\). Its SIC-normalized minimum tends to one, and \(\lambda(\phi_q)/\Lambda_q^\star\to1\) for the global finite-field WH max--min optimum \(\Lambda_q^\star\), without assuming SIC existence. The complete spectrum determines the exact finite-sample Hilbert--Schmidt error of canonical linear inversion at \(I/d\), while its lower edge controls local Fisher efficiency and canonical-shadow bounds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.11850 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spectral stability beyond binary informational completeness; larger [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. uses the WH-SIC value R = 1 as its benchmark. Across the displayed primes, the balanced-Alltop ratio decreases from 1.474 to 1.194, whereas the Haar median rises from 3.117 to 6.108 and the geometric representa￾tive grows from 8.828 to 3.20 × 106 . Thus informational completeness alone does not control this canonical finite￾sample linear-inversion MSE, even for the fixed maximally mixed input. Fisher information qua… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Substitution of a character gives Gϕfm,n =  ∑ a,b gϕ(a,b)ωma+nb  fm,n.(A1) The d2 characters are orthonormal and complete, while Eq

    Route A: Fourier/circulant diagonalization Equation (8) depends only on the phase-space differ- ence v−u , soGϕ is a two-dimensional circulant matrix. Substitution of a character gives Gϕfm,n =  ∑ a,b gϕ(a,b)ωma+nb  fm,n.(A1) The d2 characters are orthonormal and complete, while Eq. (16) identifies the coefficient in parentheses as d|χϕ(−n,m )|2. This...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Route B: synthesis-operator reduction LetT ϕ :C Z2 d→L(C d)be the synthesis operator Tϕc= ∑ a,b c(a,b)Πa,b.(A2) Then Gϕ = T† ϕTϕ. The normalized displacements d−1/2Dp,q form an orthonormal operator basis, and Da,bDp,qD† a,b =ω bp−aqDp,q.(A3) ExpandingΠ 0,0 in this basis and inserting Eq.(11) gives Tϕfm,n = 1 d ∑ a,b ωma+nbDa,bΠ0,0D† a,b =χϕ(−n,m)D−n,m.(A4...

    work page

  3. [3]

    the coordinate probabilities are flat,|cx|2 = 1/d; 3.S−S̸=Z d, in particular if |S|< 1 + √ 4d−3 2 ;(D1) 4.ϕ is a stabilizer state for the same WH/Clifford structure. Proof. For item 1, pairx and x +d/2in χϕ(d/2,b ) =∑ xcx+d/2cxωbx;the two terms cancel for oddb. For item 2, χϕ(0,b ) = d−1∑ xωbx = 0when b̸ = 0. For item 3, if a /∈S−S , every term ofχϕ(a,b )...

    work page

  4. [4]

    For oddd≥ 3, take the missing coordinate to be zero

    Parity constructions and polynomial stability We now prove Proposition 7 directly from the ambiguity function. For oddd≥ 3, take the missing coordinate to be zero. The unnormalized cyclic correlations ofc0 = 0 andc x = 1forx̸= 0are Aa,b := ∑ x cx+acxωbx =    d−1, a=b= 0, −1, a= 0, b̸= 0, d−2, a̸= 0, b= 0, −(1 +ω−ab), a̸= 0, b̸= 0. (D2) Division b...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Goldberger, S

    A. Goldberger, S. Kang, and K. A. Okoudjou, To- wards a classification of incomplete Gabor POVMs in Cd, Linear Multilinear Algebra70, 7536–7557 (2022), doi:10.1080/03081087.2021.1998308

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    Klappenecker, M

    A. Klappenecker, M. Rötteler, I. E. Shparlinski, and A. Winterhof, On approximately symmetric information- ally complete positive operator-valued measurements and related systems of quantum states, J. Math. Phys.46, 082104 (2005), doi:10.1063/1.1998831

    doi:10.1063/1.1998831 2005

  7. [7]

    Cao and X

    M. Cao and X. Deng, Construction ofεd-ASIC-POVMs via 2-to-1 PN functions and the Li bound, Finite Fields Appl.95, 102388 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.ffa.2024.102388

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Huang, R

    H.-Y. Huang, R. Kueng, and J. Preskill, Predict- ing many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements, Nat. Phys.16, 1050–1057 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7

    doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7 2020

Show all 28 references
  1. [9]

    Acharya, S

    A. Acharya, S. Saha, and A. M. Sengupta, Shadow to- mography based on informationally complete positive operator-valued measurement, Phys. Rev. A104, 052418 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.104.052418

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    Innocenti, S

    L. Innocenti, S. Lorenzo, I. Palmisano, F. Albarelli, A. Ferraro, M.Paternostro, andG.M.Palma, Shadowtomog- raphy on general measurement frames, PRX Quantum4, 040328 (2023), doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.040328

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    Saini, J

    R. Saini, J. Kiukas, D. Burgarth, and A. Gilchrist, Char- acterizing Fisher information of quantum measurement, arXiv:2512.15428 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Saini, J

    R. Saini, J. Kiukas, D. Burgarth, and A. Gilchrist, Com- pleteness stability of quantum measurements, Phys. Rev. A113, 012424 (2026), doi:10.1103/wkj6-l7bf

    2026 doi

  5. [13]

    J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott, and C. M. Caves, Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements, J. Math. Phys.45, 2171–2180 (2004), doi:10.1063/1.1737053

    2004 doi

  6. [14]

    A. J. Scott, Tight informationally complete quantum measurements, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.39, 13507–13530 (2006), doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/43/009

    2006 doi

  7. [15]

    Horodecki, Ł

    P. Horodecki, Ł. Rudnicki, and K. Życzkowski, Five open problems in quantum information theory, PRX Quantum 3, 010101 (2022), doi:10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010101

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    Bengtsson, M

    I. Bengtsson, M. Grassl, and G. McConnell, SIC-POVMs from Stark units: Dimensionsn2 + 3 = 4p, p prime, J. Math. Phys.66, 082202 (2025), doi:10.1063/5.0212617

    2025 doi

  9. [17]

    Appleby, S

    M. Appleby, S. T. Flammia, and G. S. Kopp, A con- structive approach to Zauner’s conjecture via the Stark conjectures, arXiv:2501.03970 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Farkas, J

    M. Farkas, J. Volčič, S. A. L. Storgaard, R. Chen, and L. Mančinska, Maximal device-independent random- ness in every dimension, Nat. Phys.22, 319–324 (2026), doi:10.1038/s41567-025-03141-y

    2026 doi

  11. [19]

    G. M. D’Ariano, P. Perinotti, and M. F. Sacchi, Informa- tionally complete measurements and group representation, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt.6, S487–S491 (2004), doi:10.1088/1464-4266/6/6/005

    2004 doi

  12. [20]

    M. Cao, T. Deng, and Y. Wang, Dynamical quantum state tomography with time-dependent channels, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 215301 (2024), doi:10.1088/1751- 8121/ad45ce

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Bojarovska and A

    I. Bojarovska and A. Flinth, Phase retrieval from Gabor measurements, J. Fourier Anal. Appl.22, 542–567 (2016), doi:10.1007/s00041-015-9431-0

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    Singal, F

    T. Singal, F. B. Maciejewski, and M. Oszmaniec, Im- plementation of quantum measurements using classical resources and only a single ancillary qubit, npj Quantum Inf.8, 82 (2022), doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00589-1

    2022 doi

  15. [23]

    W. O. Alltop, Complex sequences with low periodic cor- relations, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory26, 350–354 (1980), doi:10.1109/TIT.1980.1056185

    1980

  16. [24]

    Klappenecker and M

    A. Klappenecker and M. Rötteler, Constructions of mu- tually unbiased bases, inFinite Fields and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2948 (Springer, Berlin, 2004), pp. 137–144, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24633- 6_10

    2004 doi

  17. [25]

    J. L. Hall, A. Rao, and S. M. Gagola III, A family of Alltop functions that are EA-inequivalent to the cubic function, IEEE Trans. Commun.61, 4722–4727 (2013), doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2013.091813.130127

    2013

  18. [26]

    Lidl and H

    R. Lidl and H. Niederreiter,Finite Fields, 2nd ed., En- cyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications Vol. 20 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  19. [27]

    L. E. Fischer, T. Dao, I. Tavernelli, and F. Tacchino, Dual- frame optimization for informationally complete quan- tum measurements, Phys. Rev. A109, 062415 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.109.062415

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    C. F. Dunkl, P. Gawron, J. A. Holbrook, Z. Puchała, and K. Życzkowski, Numerical shadows: Measures and densities on the numerical range, Linear Algebra Appl. 434, 2042–2080 (2011), doi:10.1016/j.laa.2010.12.003

    2011 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.