Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 89 references

HandEdit: A Unified Benchmark for Egocentric Human-to-Robot Dexterous Hand Image Editing

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read HandEdit is the first large-scale benchmark for turning egocentric human hand images into dexterous robot hand images, with 200M editing instances across 26 robot embodiments.

desk verdict HandEdit is a genuinely useful new benchmark resource, but its load-bearing pseudo-GT is not validated on retained samples and the paper's own appendix admits as much. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12122 v1 pith:3GZMF4GD submitted 2026-08-12 cs.RO cs.CV

Zhenjie Yang , Xingyu Jiao , Guopeng Zhong , Shuzhe Yang , Shi Che , Chao Wu , Chenyu Jiang , Dongjie Zhang
show 13 more authors
Yideng Zhang Zheng Zhang Muyun Jiang Haisheng Su Shuang Jin Donghang Zhang Chao Yang Li Chen Hongyang Li Zuxuan Wu Yu-Gang Jiang Xiaosong Jia Junchi Yan
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords egocentricmanipulationimageeditingdexterousrobothandURDF-conditionedbenchmarkhuman-to-robottransferpseudo-ground-truth
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

HandEdit is a dataset and benchmark for a specific image-editing task: take an egocentric photo of a human hand or arm manipulating an object and replace that hand with a specified robot hand or hand-arm, judged against a target robot model. The paper's central claim is that this task can be studied at scale—over 200 million editing instances derived from five public egocentric hand-object datasets, spanning 26 robot embodiments—and that doing so reveals a capability gap in current editors. The authors construct pseudo-ground-truth targets by segmenting the human hand, inpainting the background, retargeting the recorded MANO hand pose to a target URDF, solving for a virtual base with inverse kinematics, rendering the robot into the scene, and harmonizing the composite. They then benchmark 11 commercial and open-source editors with a metric suite that includes generic similarity, VLM judgment, and embodiment-aware metrics. The result is a shared testbed that could let image-editing models be trained and evaluated on embodiment fidelity, and could supply robot-centric training images from abundant human video without costly teleoperation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the staged pseudo-ground-truth pipeline. It uses SAM3 to segment the human hand or arm, ProPainter to inpaint the occluded background, then converts the MANO or 3D hand pose into target-robot joint states via embodiment-specific retargeting—a hybrid coarse alignment followed by position-based refinement that respects joint limits, link lengths, and contact geometry. For hand-arm embodiments, a fixed camera-relative virtual base is chosen from 27 candidate bases by searching horizontal translation and yaw, with base height, roll, and pitch fixed, and ranked by IK feasibility, reachability, joint limits, collisions, and trajectory quality; a human operator selects among the top three sequence-level solutions. The rendered URDF is composited and harmonized with Harmonizer to produce the pseudo-GT. The evaluation side of the machinery is the metric suite: generic PSNR/SSIM/LPIPS/FID over full image, ROI, and background; a VLM judge with Semantic Consistency and Perceptual Quality sub-scores; and embodiment-aware metrics including skin-pixel removal, DINOv2 structural fidelity, CLIP-based identity fidelity against a render bank plus CIELAB color consistency, and LPIPS on the object-contact region.

What would settle it

Load a random sample of retained pseudo-GT frames into a rigid-body simulator with the actual URDF and object meshes, and count frames where the robot hand penetrates the object by more than 2 cm or where the minimum fingertip-to-object distance exceeds 20 mm during the interaction. If more than about 10% of retained frames violate these thresholds, the pseudo-GT targets are not physically grounded and the benchmark's evaluation is built on unrealistic references. A complementary check is to fine-tune an open-source editor on the paired data and then measure a downstream robot policy's real simulation success; if policy success does not correlate with HandEdit's embodiment-aware scores, the metric suite is not measuring what matters for manipulation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

This paper tries to establish that human-to-robot dexterous hand editing deserves to be a first-class image-editing benchmark, and that current general-purpose editors are not ready for it. Its evidence is a pipeline that generates paired human-source and robot-target images: remove the hand with segmentation, restore the background with video inpainting, retarget the MANO hand pose into robot joint states under kinematic constraints, place a fixed camera-relative virtual base through an IK search, render the target URDF, and harmonize the composite. On the resulting benchmark, the paper reports that the best commercial editor can erase the human hand (removal scores above 0.95) but still struggles with structural fidelity and identity fidelity, and that the main failure mode is embodiment correctness rather than background preservation. The paper also argues that no prior benchmark jointly supports egocentric input, dexterous hands, URDF conditioning, and multi-embodiment evaluation.

Load-bearing premise

The pseudo-ground-truth targets must be physically plausible robot embodiments that match the recorded interaction; if the retargeting or virtual-base IK produces implausible poses, every metric computed against those targets is suspect. The paper's own quality-control data show retargeting as the dominant rejection cause (63.5% of a 5,000-frame sampled non-kept pool) and an overall non-kept rate of about 33%, so the retained benchmark may be biased toward easy cases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If HandEdit's pseudo-GT targets are trustworthy, the 200M paired instances become training data for editors that turn any egocentric human manipulation video into robot-centric visual observations.
  • The two-track protocol (hand-only vs. hand-arm) gives a concrete way to measure how much extra difficulty arm composition, viewpoint, and larger edited regions add beyond the hand itself.
  • The reported gap between VLM-based judgment and structural/identity fidelity implies that semantic-level evaluation is insufficient for embodied editing tasks, and geometric fidelity metrics must be part of future benchmarks.
  • A model that performs well on HandEdit should, in principle, produce robot demonstration images that can be used for policy pre-training, reducing the need for costly teleoperation data collection.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 33% non-kept rate and retargeting-dominated rejections suggest that the published benchmark likely under-represents tight grasps, articulated objects, and bimanual contact; scores on HandEdit may therefore overestimate how well an editing model transfers to real, unstructured manipulation images.
  • The virtual-base search fixes base height, roll, and pitch and only explores three lateral positions, three forward positions, and three yaws; this strong prior may fail for egocentric videos where the camera moves with the head and the arm is not upright relative to gravity.
  • A testable extension not run in the paper is to fine-tune an open-source editor on the paired human-robot images and then evaluate downstream robot policy success in simulation, which would directly connect editing quality to manipulation performance.
  • Because the harmonizer is trained on only 10,000 egocentric hand images, one could probe whether harmonization artifacts—rather than retargeting errors—limit identity fidelity by comparing scores with and without the harmonization stage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces HandEdit, a dataset and benchmark for egocentric human-to-robot dexterous hand and hand-arm image editing. It describes a data curation pipeline that removes the human hand from egocentric frames, retargets MANO/3D hand poses into 26 URDF-based robot embodiments, and composites the rendered robot into the inpainted scene to form pseudo-GT references. The dataset is claimed to contain over 200M editing instances derived from five public egocentric manipulation datasets, with two benchmark tracks (Hand-only and Hand-Arm) and a metric suite combining generic similarity metrics, GPT-4o-based VLM judgment, and embodiment-aware metrics. The paper benchmarks 11 commercial and open-source image-editing models and reports a blinded human evaluation with agreement statistics. The central claim is that HandEdit is the first large-scale, URDF-conditioned benchmark for embodiment-aware dexterous-hand image editing.

Significance. If its pseudo-GT targets are credible, HandEdit would be a valuable resource: it unifies five public egocentric datasets, covers a broad and reasonably diverse URDF roster, and provides a structured evaluation protocol with two tracks and a multi-dimensional metric suite. The publication of code, dataset, and a fixed embodiment reference bank is a concrete contribution, as is the blinded human evaluation with Krippendorff's alpha and metric-human agreement results. The paper is also measured in acknowledging that pseudo-references cannot replace real-robot data. However, the benchmark's usefulness as a reference-based evaluation resource depends on the correctness of the retained pseudo-GT composites, and that is exactly the point whose validation is incomplete.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1 / Appendix B.2 / Eqs. (4), (6)] The benchmark's reference-based evaluation is validated only on pipeline rejection, not on retained-sample correctness. Appendix B.2 reports a 33% overall non-kept rate for the ARCTIC run, attributes 63.46% of sampled non-kept frames to hand retargeting, and then explicitly states that these statistics 'do not measure residual errors among retained samples.' Yet the generic similarity metrics in Tables 3 and 5 and the structural/color fidelity terms in Eqs. (4) and (6) score every model against the retained pseudo-GT composites. The paper must report retained-sample validation: contact-distance and penetration checks, independent human kinematic-plausibility ratings with agreement statistics, and ideally a small real-robot or manually reconstructed subset. Without this, the reported model rankings could reflect pipeline artifacts rather than editing quality.
  2. [§3.2 / Table 2 / Abstract] The claimed scale is not decomposed for QC retention. The five source rows in Table 2 sum to roughly 99M raw frames, yet the abstract claims 'over 200M editing instances'; the relationship between raw frames, the 26-embodiment roster, and the 200M figure is not stated (e.g., frames multiplied by embodiments, per-clip instances, or pre-QC counts). If the 200M number counts inputs before the automatic checks and manual screening described in §3.1, the retained pseudo-GT set is smaller and potentially biased toward easy cases. The paper should report per-source retained-instance counts, the number of unique frames surviving all QC stages, and the same breakdown for the 2K-image test set used in Tables 3–6.
  3. [§4.1 / Tables 3–6] No confidence intervals or significance tests are reported, so the ranking conclusions are not statistically supported. For example, in Table 4, GPT-Image-2's structural fidelity (0.780) is numerically close to Nano-Banana-2's (0.746), and in Table 6 the ID-fidelity ordering flips between GPT-Image-2 (0.563) and GPT-Image-1.5 (0.606); on a 1K-image test set these gaps may be within noise. The benchmark's claims about which editor is strongest require bootstrapped confidence intervals per track and metric, or paired significance tests across models.
  4. [§3.1 / Appendix B.3] The virtual-base search introduces a human operator selection among the top-three sequence-level candidates, but inter-operator agreement and the frequency of implausible candidates are not reported. Since the chosen base is fixed across all frames and determines wrist/arm trajectories in the Hand-Arm track, this unmeasured variability directly affects the correctness of retained pseudo-GT targets. A small inter-operator reliability study, reporting agreement and the rejection rate of top-three sets, would resolve this load-bearing gap.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Table S1 vs. §3.3 / Abstract] Table S1 lists only 12 hand-only URDFs (Allegro, Revo2, DexHand021, Leap, Orca, RH56DFX, RH5DG2, RoHand, Schunk Hand, Shadow Hand, Sharpa, Wuji), while the abstract and §3.3 state 13 hand-only embodiments; the 'Ability' hand appears only in the hand-arm row. The roster should be made consistent.
  2. [Appendix B.2] The sentence 'we report the per-cause proportions within the sampled non-kept pool and do not extrapolate them to all raw frames' is followed by an 'overall non-kept rate of approximately 33%' for the ARCTIC run; it should be clarified whether that 33% applies to raw frames or to candidate units, so the reader can interpret the rejection rate consistently.
  3. [Table 4 / Table 6] The 'Pseudo-GT' rows are useful as sanity checks, but the interaction scores of 0.821 and 0.788 for pseudo-GT, rather than 1.0, deserve a one-sentence explanation because Eq. (8) compares the source image with the edited image and readers may otherwise see a tautological self-score as a discrepancy.
  4. [§3.4 / Eq. (1)] FID is reported on ROI crops of roughly 1K images without stating the number of images or a bootstrap interval; a brief note that FID values on small crops are high-variance would help interpretation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: HandEdit is an empirical benchmark whose pseudo-GT reference is the intended evaluation target, with no fitted parameter renamed as prediction and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

HandEdit is a dataset and benchmark construction rather than a predictive derivation. The pseudo-GT composites are produced by the pipeline described in Section 3.1, and the evaluation metrics in Section 3.4 compare model outputs against these composites by design; this is the intended evaluation target for a benchmark, not a hidden circular reduction. No metric weight or threshold is fitted to the model outputs: lambda=0.5 and tau_Lab=25 are fixed constants, and the S_vlm aggregation in Eq. 2 uses a standard min-score normalization adopted from external VLM evaluation frameworks. The Harmonizer is trained on 10,000 natural egocentric hand images for appearance post-processing, not on the benchmark outputs or on the evaluated models, so it is not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. The human evaluation in Appendix F is blinded, hides model names, metric scores, and pseudo-GT targets, and independently rates target-robot correctness, scene/interaction preservation, and realism, providing external validation rather than circular self-confirmation. The retargeting method (AnyTeleop [67]) and segmentation/inpainting tools are external resources; no load-bearing claim rests on a self-citation. The rejection statistics in Appendix B and the limitation statement in Section G, acknowledging a gap from real-robot observations in fine-grained appearance and contact dynamics, are correctness and validity risks concerning pseudo-GT plausibility, not circularity: they do not make any metric or result equivalent to an input by construction. A benchmark may define its own reference, and evaluating against that reference is the intended protocol; the paper does not claim to derive the reference from the evaluated models or to predict a fitted quantity. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The main assumptions are about the validity of the pseudo-GT pipeline and the metric suite; the free parameters are hand-set constants in the evaluation metrics and quality-control thresholds that shape the dataset composition.

free parameters (4)
  • tau_Lab = 25
    Temperature in the CIELAB color consistency score (Eq. 6); set by hand without ablation.
  • lambda_ID = 0.5
    Weight balancing URDF-reference CLIP similarity and CIELAB color score in ID fidelity (Eq. 7); set by hand.
  • QC rejection thresholds = fingertip/wrist error > 50 mm; contact distance > 20 mm; SAM confidence >= 0.75
    Manual thresholds in Appendix B Table S3 that determine which samples enter the dataset and pseudo-GT set.
  • virtual base search grid = translations {-0.10Lr, 0, 0.10Lr}, yaw {-15, 0, 15}, 27 candidates
    Hand-set search range for the embodiment-adaptive virtual base search (Appendix B.3); affects all hand-arm samples.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Pseudo-GT pipeline outputs are physically plausible and accurate enough to serve as ground truth for training and evaluation.
    Central premise of the benchmark; Section 3.1 and Appendix B. The paper's own QC shows 33% rejection for ARCTIC, so retained samples may be biased.
  • domain assumption MANO/3D hand pose estimates in the five source datasets are accurate enough for retargeting to 26 embodiments.
    Sec 3.1: retargeting relies on MANO or 3D hand pose; no error analysis of pose input is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper A fixed camera-relative virtual base is a valid model for the unobservable robot base in egocentric video.
    Sec 3.1: the robot base is not visible, so a virtual base is imposed; this is a modeling choice specific to this paper.
  • domain assumption The VLM (GPT-4o) and embodiment-aware metrics faithfully reflect editing quality.
    Sec 3.4 and Appendix F: metric-human agreement is only moderate (Fleiss kappa 0.554-0.586).
  • domain assumption The frozen URDF render bank and text descriptions fully specify the target embodiment for evaluation.
    Appendix C.4: descriptions generated once and frozen; models can be compared to these references.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HandEdit: A Unified Benchmark for Egocentric Human-to-Robot Dexterous Hand Image Editing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3GZMF4GD

@misc{pith2026260812122,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HandEdit: A Unified Benchmark for Egocentric Human-to-Robot Dexterous Hand Image Editing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3GZMF4GD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12122}
}
read the original abstract

Robotic manipulation with dexterous hands is a cornerstone of Embodied AI, yet its progress is stifled by the high cost of collecting embodiment-aware teleoperation data. While abundant egocentric videos of human hands offer a scalable alternative, the profound discrepancies in appearance, articulation, and camera viewpoints between human and robotic data raise significant challenges for co-training. Though existing general image-editing models demonstrate strong capabilities, they lack necessary embodiment-specific priors to fully bridge this gap. In this work, we present HandEdit, a unified large-scale embodiment-aware image-editing dataset and benchmark specifically designed to transform human hands and arms into various dexterous robotic embodiments within egocentric frames. HandEdit comprises over 200M editing instances derived from five diverse source datasets, covering 26 distinct URDFs, including 13 hand-only and 13 hand-arm configurations. Alongside the dataset, we establish a unified benchmark protocol with two tracks: Hand-only and Hand-Arm, supporting URDF-conditioned evaluation. We conduct extensive evaluations of 11 representative image-editing baselines using a multi-dimensional metric suite, including generic similarity metrics, VLM-based judgment, and embodiment-aware metrics. HandEdit serves as a critical resource at the intersection of image editing and robotics: it advances embodiment-aware editing models while enabling scalable dexterous robotic learning from abundant human video data, paving the way for more generalizable Embodied AI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scale

    Anthony Brohan, Noah Brown, Justice Carbajal, Yevgen Chebotar, Joseph Dabis, Chelsea Finn, Keerthana Gopalakrishnan, Karol Hausman, Alexander Herzog, Jasmine Hsu, Julian Ibarz, Brian Ichter, Alex Irpan, Tomas Jackson, Sally Jesmonth, Nikhil Joshi, Ryan Julian, Dmitry Kalashnikov, Yuheng Kuang, Isabel Leal, Kuang-Huei Lee, Sergey Levine, Yao Lu, Utsav Mall...

    2023

  2. [2]

    Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models

    Abby O’Neill, Abdul Rehman, Abhinav Gupta, Abhiram Maddukuri, Abhishek Gupta, Abhishek Padalkar, Abraham Lee, Acorn Pooley, Agrim Gupta, Ajay Mandlekar, et al. Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 6892–6903, 2024. doi: 10.1109/ICRA57147.202...

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Alexander Khazatsky, Karl Pertsch, Suraj Nair, Ashwin Balakrishna, Sudeep Dasari, Siddharth Karamcheti, Soroush Nasiriany, Mohan Kumar Srirama, Lawrence Yunliang Chen, Kirsty Ellis, Peter David Fagan, Joey Hejna, Masha Itkina, Marion Lepert, Yecheng Jason Ma, Patrick Tree Miller, Jimmy Wu, Suneel Belkhale, Shivin Dass, Huy Ha, Arhan Jain, Abraham Lee, You...

    2024

  4. [4]

    Agibot world colosseo: A large-scale manipulation platform for scalable and intelligent embodied systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06669, 2025

    Qingwen Bu, Jisong Cai, Li Chen, Xiuqi Cui, Yan Ding, Siyuan Feng, Shenyuan Gao, Xindong He, Xu Huang, Shu Jiang, et al. Agibot world colosseo: A large-scale manipulation platform for scalable and intelligent embodied systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06669, 2025. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2503.06669

    arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale

    Homer Rich Walke, Kevin Black, Tony Z Zhao, Quan Vuong, Chongyi Zheng, Philippe Hansen-Estruch, Andre Wang He, Vivek Myers, Moo Jin Kim, Max Du, et al. Bridgedata v2: A dataset for robot learning at scale. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 1723–1736. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  6. [6]

    Robomind: Benchmark on multi-embodiment intelligence normative data for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13877, 2024

    Kun Wu, Chengkai Hou, Jiaming Liu, Zhengping Che, Xiaozhu Ju, Zhuqin Yang, Meng Li, Yinuo Zhao, Zhiyuan Xu, Guang Yang, et al. Robomind: Benchmark on multi-embodiment intelligence normative data for robot manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13877, 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2412.13877

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Zhao, and Chelsea Finn

    Zipeng Fu, Tony Z. Zhao, and Chelsea Finn. Mobile ALOHA: Learning Bimanual Mobile Manipulation using Low-Cost Whole-Body Teleoperation. In Pulkit Agrawal, Oliver Kroemer, and Wolfram Burgard, 12 editors,Proceedings of The 8th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 270 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 4066–4083. PMLR, 06–09 Nov 2025. URL htt...

    2025

  8. [8]

    Fastumi: A scalable and hardware-independent universal manipulation interface with dataset

    Zhaxizhuoma, Kehui Liu, Chuyue Guan, Zhongjie Jia, Ziniu Wu, Xin Liu, Tianyu Wang, Shuai Liang, Pengan Chen, Pingrui Zhang, et al. Fastumi: A scalable and hardware-independent universal manipulation interface with dataset. InConference on Robot Learning, pages 3069–3093. PMLR, 2025

    2025

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    FastUMI-100K: Advancing Data-driven Robotic Manipulation with a Large-scale UMI-style Dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08022, 2025

    Kehui Liu, Zhongjie Jia, Yang Li, Pengan Chen, Song Liu, Xin Liu, Pingrui Zhang, Haoming Song, Xinyi Ye, Nieqing Cao, et al. FastUMI-100K: Advancing Data-driven Robotic Manipulation with a Large-scale UMI-style Dataset.arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08022, 2025. URL https://arxiv.o...

  2. [10]

    Universal manipulation interface: In-the-wild robot teaching without in-the-wild robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10329, 2024

    Cheng Chi, Zhenjia Xu, Chuer Pan, Eric Cousineau, Benjamin Burchfiel, Siyuan Feng, Russ Tedrake, and Shuran Song. Universal manipulation interface: In-the-wild robot teaching without in-the-wild robots.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10329, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10329

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    exumi: Extensible robot teaching system with action-aware task-agnostic tactile representation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14688, 2025

    Yue Xu, Litao Wei, Pengyu An, Qingyu Zhang, and Yong-Lu Li. exumi: Extensible robot teaching system with action-aware task-agnostic tactile representation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.14688, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14688

    2025

  4. [12]

    UMI on legs: Making manipulation policies mobile with manipulation-centric whole-body controllers

    Huy Ha, Yihuai Gao, Zipeng Fu, Jie Tan, and Shuran Song. UMI on legs: Making manipulation policies mobile with manipulation-centric whole-body controllers. InProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Robot Learning, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    DexUMI: Using Human Hand as the Universal Manipulation Interface for Dexterous Manipulation

    Mengda Xu, Han Zhang, Yifan Hou, Zhenjia Xu, Linxi Fan, Manuela Veloso, and Shuran Song. DexUMI: Using Human Hand as the Universal Manipulation Interface for Dexterous Manipulation. In Joseph Lim, Shuran Song, and Hae-Won Park, editors,Proceedings of The 9th Conference on Robo...

    2025

  6. [14]

    Ego4D: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video

    Kristen Grauman, Andrew Westbury, Eugene Byrne, Zachary Chavis, Antonino Furnari, Rohit Girdhar, Jackson Hamburger, Hao Jiang, Miao Liu, Xingyu Liu, et al. Ego4D: Around the world in 3,000 hours of egocentric video. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision a...

    2022

  7. [15]

    Yoon, Mouli Sivapurapu, and Jian Zhang

    Ryan Hoque, Peide Huang, David J. Yoon, Mouli Sivapurapu, and Jian Zhang. EgoDex: Learning dexterous manipulation from large-scale egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11709, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    HOI4D: A 4d egocentric dataset for category-level human-object interaction

    Yunze Liu, Yun Liu, Che Jiang, Kangbo Lyu, Weikang Wan, Hao Shen, Boqiang Liang, Zhoujie Fu, He Wang, and Li Yi. HOI4D: A 4d egocentric dataset for category-level human-object interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CV...

    2022

  9. [17]

    HOT3D: Hand and object tracking in 3d from egocentric multi-view videos

    Prithviraj Banerjee, Sindi Shkodrani, Pierre Moulon, Shreyas Hampali, Shangchen Han, Fan Zhang, Linguang Zhang, Jade Fountain, Edward Miller, Selen Basol, et al. HOT3D: Hand and object tracking in 3d from egocentric multi-view videos. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference o...

    2025

  10. [18]

    Openego: A large-scale multimodal egocentric dataset for dexterous manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05513, 2025

    Ahad Jawaid and Yu Xiang. Openego: A large-scale multimodal egocentric dataset for dexterous manipulation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05513, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.05513

    2025 arXiv

  11. [19]

    EgoVerse: An Egocentric Human Dataset for Robot Learning from Around the World.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.07607, 2026

    Ryan Punamiya, Simar Kareer, Zeyi Liu, Josh Citron, Ri-Zhao Qiu, Xiongyi Cai, Alexey Gavryushin, Jiaqi Chen, Davide Liconti, Lawrence Y Zhu, et al. EgoVerse: An Egocentric Human Dataset for Robot Learning from Around the World.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.07607, 2026. URL https: ...

    2026 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Egolife: Towards egocentric life assistant

    Jingkang Yang, Shuai Liu, Hongming Guo, Yuhao Dong, Xiamengwei Zhang, Sicheng Zhang, Pengyun Wang, Zitang Zhou, Binzhu Xie, Ziyue Wang, et al. Egolife: Towards egocentric life assistant. In Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 28885–28900, 2025

    2025

  13. [22]

    EgoMimic: Scaling imitation learning via egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24221, 2024

    Simar Kareer, Dhruv Patel, Ryan Punamiya, Pranay Mathur, Shuo Cheng, Chen Wang, Judy Hoffman, and Danfei Xu. EgoMimic: Scaling imitation learning via egocentric video.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24221, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  14. [23]

    EgoZero: Robot learning from smart glasses.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20290, 2025

    Vincent Liu, Ademi Adeniji, Haotian Zhan, Raunaq Bhirangi, Pieter Abbeel, and Lerrel Pinto. EgoZero: Robot learning from smart glasses.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.20290, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  15. [24]

    OKAMI: Teaching humanoid robots manipulation skills through single video imitation

    Jinhan Li, Yifeng Zhu, Yuqi Xie, Zhenyu Jiang, Mingyo Seo, Georgios Pavlakos, and Yuke Zhu. OKAMI: Teaching humanoid robots manipulation skills through single video imitation. InProceedings of The 8th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 270 ofProceedings of Machine Learning R...

    2025

  16. [25]

    EgoScale: Scaling Dexterous Manipulation with Diverse Egocentric Human Data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16710, 2026

    Ruijie Zheng, Dantong Niu, Yuqi Xie, Jing Wang, Mengda Xu, Yunfan Jiang, Fernando Casta ˜neda, Fengyuan Hu, You Liang Tan, Letian Fu, Trevor Darrell, Furong Huang, Yuke Zhu, Danfei Xu, and Linxi Fan. EgoScale: Scaling Dexterous Manipulation with Diverse Egocentric Human Data.a...

    2026

  17. [26]

    H2R: A human-to-robot data augmentation for robot pre-training from videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11920, 2025

    Guangrun Li, Yaoxu Lyu, Zhuoyang Liu, Chengkai Hou, Yinda Xu, Jieyu Zhang, and Shanghang Zhang. H2R: A human-to-robot data augmentation for robot pre-training from videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11920, 2025

    2025

  18. [27]

    Rwor: Generating robot demonstrations from human hand collection for policy learning without robot

    Liang Heng, Xiaoqi Li, Shangqing Mao, Jiaming Liu, Ruolin Liu, Jingli Wei, Yu-Kai Wang, Yueru Jia, Chenyang Gu, Rui Zhao, et al. Rwor: Generating robot demonstrations from human hand collection for policy learning without robot. In2025 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Inte...

    2025

  19. [28]

    Phantom: Training Robots Without Robots Using Only Human Videos

    Marion Lepert, Jiaying Fang, and Jeannette Bohg. Phantom: Training Robots Without Robots Using Only Human Videos. InProceedings of The 9th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 305 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. PMLR, 2025

    2025

  20. [29]

    Masquerade: Learning from In-the-Wild Human Videos Using Data-Editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09976, 2025

    Marion Lepert, Jiaying Fang, and Jeannette Bohg. Masquerade: Learning from In-the-Wild Human Videos Using Data-Editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.09976, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  21. [30]

    SHADOW: Leveraging segmentation masks for cross-embodiment policy transfer

    Marion Lepert, Ria Doshi, and Jeannette Bohg. SHADOW: Leveraging segmentation masks for cross-embodiment policy transfer. InProceedings of The 8th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 270 ofProceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 3536–3550. PMLR, 2025

    2025

  22. [31]

    H2R-grounder: A paired-data-free paradigm for translating human interaction videos into physically grounded robot videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09406, 2025

    Hai Ci, Xiaokang Liu, Pei Yang, Yiren Song, and Mike Zheng Shou. H2R-grounder: A paired-data-free paradigm for translating human interaction videos into physically grounded robot videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.09406, 2025

    2025

  23. [32]

    Mitty: Diffusion-based Human-to-Robot Video Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17253, 2025

    Yiren Song, Cheng Liu, Weijia Mao, and Mike Zheng Shou. Mitty: Diffusion-based Human-to-Robot Video Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17253, 2025. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2512. 17253. 14

    2025

  24. [33]

    MimicDreamer: Aligning Human and Robot Demonstrations for Scalable VLA Training

    Haoyun Li, Ivan Zhang, Runqi Ouyang, Xiaofeng Wang, Zheng Zhu, Zhiqin Yang, Zhentao Zhang, Boyuan Wang, Chaojun Ni, Wenkang Qin, Xinze Chen, Yun Ye, Guan Huang, Zhenbo Song, and Xingang Wang. MimicDreamer: Aligning Human and Robot Demonstrations for Scalable VLA Training. arXi...

    2025

  25. [34]

    Black, and Otmar Hilliges

    Zicong Fan, Omid Taheri, Dimitrios Tzionas, Muhammed Kocabas, Manuel Kaufmann, Michael J. Black, and Otmar Hilliges. ARCTIC: A dataset for dexterous bimanual hand-object manipulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), ...

    2023

  26. [35]

    OAKINK2: A dataset of bimanual hands-object manipulation in complex task completion

    Xinyu Zhan, Lixin Yang, Yifei Zhao, Kangrui Mao, Hanlin Xu, Zenan Lin, Kailin Li, and Cewu Lu. OAKINK2: A dataset of bimanual hands-object manipulation in complex task completion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2024

    2024

  27. [36]

    HO-Cap: A capture system and dataset for 3d reconstruction and pose tracking of hand-object interaction

    Jikai Wang, Qifan Zhang, Yu-Wei Chao, Bowen Wen, Xiaohu Guo, and Yu Xiang. HO-Cap: A capture system and dataset for 3d reconstruction and pose tracking of hand-object interaction. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2025

    2025

  28. [37]

    Imagen editor and editbench: Advancing and evaluating text-guided image inpainting

    Su Wang, Chitwan Saharia, Ceslee Montgomery, Jordi Pont-Tuset, Shai Noy, Stefano Pellegrini, Yasumasa Onoe, Sarah Laszlo, David J Fleet, Radu Soricut, et al. Imagen editor and editbench: Advancing and evaluating text-guided image inpainting. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF confe...

    2023

  29. [38]

    Tim Brooks, Aleksander Holynski, and Alexei A. Efros. InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructions. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 18392–18402, 2023

    2023

  30. [39]

    MagicBrush: A manually annotated dataset for instruction-guided image editing

    Kai Zhang, Lingbo Mo, Wenhu Chen, Huan Sun, and Yu Su. MagicBrush: A manually annotated dataset for instruction-guided image editing. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2023

    2023

  31. [40]

    OmniEdit: Building Image Editing Generalist Models Through Specialist Supervision

    Cong Wei, Zheyang Xiong, Weiming Ren, Xeron Du, Ge Zhang, and Wenhu Chen. OmniEdit: Building Image Editing Generalist Models Through Specialist Supervision. InThe Thirteenth International Con- ference on Learning Representations, 2025. URL https://proceedings.iclr.cc/paper_fil...

    2025

  32. [41]

    Emu edit: Precise image editing via recognition and generation tasks

    Shelly Sheynin, Adam Polyak, Uriel Singer, Yuval Kirstain, Amit Zohar, Oron Ashual, Devi Parikh, and Yaniv Taigman. Emu edit: Precise image editing via recognition and generation tasks. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages ...

    2024

  33. [42]

    UltraEdit: Instruction-based fine-grained image editing at scale

    Haozhe Zhao, Xiaojian Ma, Liang Chen, Shuzheng Si, Rujie Wu, Kaikai An, Peiyu Yu, Minjia Zhang, Qing Li, and Baobao Chang. UltraEdit: Instruction-based fine-grained image editing at scale. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2024

    2024

  34. [43]

    Seed-data-edit technical report: A hybrid dataset for instructional image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04007, 2024

    Yuying Ge, Sijie Zhao, Chen Li, Yixiao Ge, and Ying Shan. Seed-data-edit technical report: A hybrid dataset for instructional image editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.04007, 2024. URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/2405.04007

    2024 arXiv

  35. [44]

    HQ-Edit: A High-Quality Dataset for Instruction-based Image Editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09990, 2024

    Mude Hui, Siwei Yang, Bingchen Zhao, Yichun Shi, Heng Wang, Peng Wang, Yuyin Zhou, and Cihang Xie. HQ-Edit: A High-Quality Dataset for Instruction-based Image Editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.09990, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09990

    2024 arXiv

  36. [45]

    AnyEdit: Mastering Unified High-Quality Image Editing for Any Idea.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15738, 2024

    Qifan Yu, Wei Chow, Zhongqi Yue, Kaihang Pan, Yang Wu, Xiaoyang Wan, Juncheng Li, Siliang Tang, Hanwang Zhang, and Yueting Zhuang. AnyEdit: Mastering Unified High-Quality Image Editing for Any Idea.arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.15738, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15738. 15

    2024 arXiv

  37. [47]

    MotionEdit: Benchmarking and learning motion-centric image editing

    Yixin Wan, Lei Ke, Wenhao Yu, Kai-Wei Chang, and Dong Yu. MotionEdit: Benchmarking and learning motion-centric image editing. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2026

    2026

  38. [48]

    EgoEdit: Dataset, real-time streaming model, and benchmark for egocentric video editing

    Runjia Li, Moayed Haji-Ali, Ashkan Mirzaei, Chaoyang Wang, Arpit Sahni, Ivan Skorokhodov, Aliaksandr Siarohin, Tomas Jakab, Junlin Han, Sergey Tulyakov, Philip Torr, and Willi Menapace. EgoEdit: Dataset, real-time streaming model, and benchmark for egocentric video editing. In...

    2026

  39. [49]

    H2O: Two hands manipulating objects for first person interaction recognition

    Taein Kwon, Bugra Tekin, Jan Stuhmer, Federica Bogo, and Marc Pollefeys. H2O: Two hands manipulating objects for first person interaction recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2021

    2021

  40. [50]

    World Action Models are Zero-shot Policies.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.15922, 2026

    Seonghyeon Ye, Yunhao Ge, Kaiyuan Zheng, Shenyuan Gao, Sihyun Yu, George Kurian, Suneel Indupuru, You Liang Tan, Chuning Zhu, Jiannan Xiang, Ayaan Malik, Kyungmin Lee, William Liang, Nadun Ranawaka, Jiasheng Gu, Yinzhen Xu, Guanzhi Wang, Fengyuan Hu, Avnish Narayan, Johan Bjor...

    2026 arXiv

  41. [51]

    Zentner, George Kurian, Suneel Indupuru, Pooya Jannaty, Jinwei Gu, Jun Zhang, Jitendra Malik, Pieter Abbeel, Ming-Yu Liu, Yuke Zhu, Joel Jang, and Linxi ”Jim” Fan

    Shenyuan Gao, William Liang, Kaiyuan Zheng, Ayaan Malik, Seonghyeon Ye, Sihyun Yu, Wei-Cheng Tseng, Yuzhu Dong, Kaichun Mo, Chen-Hsuan Lin, Qianli Ma, Seungjun Nah, Loic Magne, Jiannan Xiang, Yuqi Xie, Ruijie Zheng, Dantong Niu, You Liang Tan, K.R. Zentner, George Kurian, Sune...

    2026 arXiv

  42. [52]

    EgoHumanoid: Unlocking In-the-Wild Loco-Manipulation with Robot-Free Egocentric Demonstration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10106, 2026

    Modi Shi, Shijia Peng, Jin Chen, Haoran Jiang, Yinghui Li, Di Huang, Ping Luo, Hongyang Li, and Li Chen. EgoHumanoid: Unlocking In-the-Wild Loco-Manipulation with Robot-Free Egocentric Demonstration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10106, 2026. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2602. 10106

    2026 arXiv

  43. [53]

    DexVIP: Learning dexterous grasping with human hand pose priors from video

    Priyanka Mandikal and Kristen Grauman. DexVIP: Learning dexterous grasping with human hand pose priors from video. InProceedings of The 5th Conference on Robot Learning, volume 164 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 651–661. PMLR, 2022

    2022

  44. [54]

    DexArt: Benchmarking generalizable dexterous manipulation with articulated objects

    Chen Bao, Helin Xu, Yuzhe Qin, and Xiaolong Wang. DexArt: Benchmarking generalizable dexterous manipulation with articulated objects. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023

    2023

  45. [55]

    DexH2R: A benchmark for dynamic dexterous grasping in human-to-robot handover

    Youzhuo Wang, Jiayi Ye, Chuyang Xiao, Yiming Zhong, Heng Tao, Hang Yu, Yumeng Liu, Jingyi Yu, and Yuexin Ma. DexH2R: A benchmark for dynamic dexterous grasping in human-to-robot handover. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2025

    2025

  46. [56]

    UniDex: A robot foundation suite for universal dexterous hand control from egocentric human videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.22264, 2026

    Gu Zhang, Qicheng Xu, Haozhe Zhang, Jianhan Ma, Long He, Yiming Bao, Zeyu Ping, Zhecheng Yuan, Chenhao Lu, Chengbo Yuan, et al. UniDex: A robot foundation suite for universal dexterous hand control from egocentric human videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.22264, 2026. 16

    2026

  47. [57]

    MiVLA: Towards generalizable vision-language- action model with human-robot mutual imitation pre-training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.15411, 2025

    Zhenhan Yin, Xuanhan Wang, Jiahao Jiang, Kaiyuan Deng, Pengqi Chen, Shuangle Li, Chong Liu, Xing Xu, Jingkuan Song, Lianli Gao, and Heng Tao Shen. MiVLA: Towards generalizable vision-language- action model with human-robot mutual imitation pre-training.arXiv preprint arXiv:251...

    2025

  48. [58]

    Human2Robot: Learning robot actions from paired human-robot videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16587, 2025

    Sicheng Xie, Haidong Cao, Zejia Weng, Zhen Xing, Shiwei Shen, Jiaqi Leng, Xipeng Qiu, Yanwei Fu, Zuxuan Wu, and Yu-Gang Jiang. Human2Robot: Learning robot actions from paired human-robot videos.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.16587, 2025

    2025

  49. [59]

    Dexterous World Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17907, 2025

    Byungjun Kim, Taeksoo Kim, Junyoung Lee, and Hanbyul Joo. Dexterous World Models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17907, 2025

    2025

  50. [60]

    SDEdit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations

    Chenlin Meng, Yutong He, Yang Song, Jiaming Song, Jiajun Wu, Jun-Yan Zhu, and Stefano Ermon. SDEdit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022

    2022

  51. [61]

    Prompt- to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control

    Amir Hertz, Ron Mokady, Jay Tenenbaum, Kfir Aberman, Yael Pritch, and Daniel Cohen-Or. Prompt- to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross-Attention Control. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023

    2023

  52. [62]

    DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance

    Guillaume Couairon, Jakob Verbeek, Holger Schwenk, and Matthieu Cord. DiffEdit: Diffusion-based semantic image editing with mask guidance. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023

    2023

  53. [63]

    Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 3836–3847, 2023

    2023

  54. [64]

    SAM 3: Segment anything with concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719, 2025

    Nicolas Carion, Laura Gustafson, Yuan-Ting Hu, Shoubhik Debnath, Ronghang Hu, Didac Suris, Chaitanya Ryali, Kalyan Vasudev Alwala, Haitham Khedr, Andrew Huang, et al. SAM 3: Segment anything with concepts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.16719, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Shangchen Zhou, Chongyi Li, Kelvin C. K. Chan, and Chen Change Loy. ProPainter: Improving propagation and transformer for video inpainting. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), pages 10477–10486, 2023

    2023

  56. [66]

    Javier Romero, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Embodied Hands: Modeling and Capturing Hands and Bodies Together. InACM Transactions on Graphics, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH Asia, volume 36, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3130800.3130883

    2017

  57. [67]

    AnyTeleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm-hand teleoperation system

    Yuzhe Qin, Wei Yang, Binghao Huang, Karl Van Wyk, Hao Su, Xiaolong Wang, Yu-Wei Chao, and Dieter Fox. AnyTeleop: A general vision-based dexterous robot arm-hand teleoperation system. In Robotics: Science and Systems (RSS), 2023

    2023

  58. [68]

    Image quality metrics: PSNR vs

    Alain Hore and Djemel Ziou. Image quality metrics: PSNR vs. SSIM. In2010 20th international conference on pattern recognition, pages 2366–2369. IEEE, 2010

    2010

  59. [69]

    Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004

    Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity.IEEE transactions on image processing, 13(4):600–612, 2004

    2004

  60. [70]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shechtman, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 586–595, 2018. 17

    2018

  61. [71]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter. Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    2017

  62. [72]

    GPT-4o System Card

    OpenAI. GPT-4o System Card. https://openai.com/index/gpt-4o-system-card/ , 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21276. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276

    2024 arXiv

  63. [73]

    VIEScore: Towards explainable metrics for conditional image synthesis evaluation

    Max Ku, Dongfu Jiang, Cong Wei, Xiang Yue, and Wenhu Chen. VIEScore: Towards explainable metrics for conditional image synthesis evaluation. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), 2024

    2024

  64. [74]

    Holistic evaluation of text-to-image models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:69981–70011, 2023

    Tony Lee, Michihiro Yasunaga, Chenlin Meng, Yifan Mai, Joon Sung Park, Agrim Gupta, Yunzhi Zhang, Deepak Narayanan, Hannah Teufel, Marco Bellagente, et al. Holistic evaluation of text-to-image models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:69981–70011, 2023

    2023

  65. [75]

    DINOv2: Learning robust visual features without supervision.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024

    Maxime Oquab, Timothee Darcet, Theo Moutakanni, Huy Vo, Marc Szafraniec, Vasil Khalidov, Pierre Fernandez, Daniel Haziza, Francisco Massa, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, et al. DINOv2: Learning robust visual features without supervision.Transactions on Machine Learning Research, 2024

    2024

  66. [76]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh, Gabriel Goh, Sandhini Agarwal, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Pamela Mishkin, Jack Clark, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. InInternational conference on machine learning, pag...

    2021

  67. [77]

    Zhanghan Ke, Chunyi Sun, Lei Zhu, Ke Xu, and Rynson W. H. Lau. Harmonizer: Learning to perform white-box image and video harmonization. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 690–706, 2022

    2022

  68. [78]

    Introducing ChatGPT Images 2.0

    OpenAI. Introducing ChatGPT Images 2.0. https://openai.com/index/ introducing-chatgpt-images-2-0/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-06

    2026

  69. [79]

    Nano Banana 2 – gemini ai image generator & photo editor

    Google. Nano Banana 2 – gemini ai image generator & photo editor. https://gemini.google/ overview/image-generation/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-06

    2026

  70. [80]

    The new ChatGPT Images is here

    OpenAI. The new ChatGPT Images is here. https://openai.com/index/ new-chatgpt-images-is-here/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-06

    2026

  71. [81]

    Seedream 4.0: Toward next-generation multimodal image generation, 2025

    Team Seedream, Yunpeng Chen, Yu Gao, Lixue Gong, Meng Guo, Qiushan Guo, Zhiyao Guo, Xiaoxia Hou, Weilin Huang, Yixuan Huang, et al. Seedream 4.0: Toward next-generation multimodal image generation, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.20427

    2025 arXiv

  72. [82]

    FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence

    Black Forest Labs. FLUX.2: Frontier Visual Intelligence. https://bfl.ai/blog/flux-2, 2025. Accessed: 2026-05-06

    2025

  73. [84]

    Nano Banana: Free online ai image editor.https://nanobanana.io/, 2026

    Nano Banana. Nano Banana: Free online ai image editor.https://nanobanana.io/, 2026. Accessed: 2026-05-06

    2026

  74. [85]

    Qwen-Image Technical Report, 2025

    Chenfei Wu, Jiahao Li, Jingren Zhou, Junyang Lin, Kaiyuan Gao, Kun Yan, Sheng ming Yin, Shuai Bai, Xiao Xu, Yilei Chen, Yuxiang Chen, Zecheng Tang, Zekai Zhang, Zhengyi Wang, An Yang, Bowen Yu, Chen Cheng, Dayiheng Liu, Deqing Li, Hang Zhang, Hao Meng, Hu Wei, Jingyuan Ni, Kai...

    2025 arXiv

  75. [86]

    FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space, 2025

    Black Forest Labs, Stephen Batifol, Andreas Blattmann, Frederic Boesel, Saksham Consul, Cyril Diagne, Tim Dockhorn, Jack English, Zion English, Patrick Esser, et al. FLUX.1 Kontext: Flow Matching for In-Context Image Generation and Editing in Latent Space, 2025. URL https://ar...

    2025 arXiv

  76. [87]

    OmniGen2: Exploration to advanced multimodal generation, 2025

    Chenyuan Wu, Pengfei Zheng, Ruiran Yan, Shitao Xiao, Xin Luo, Yueze Wang, Wanli Li, Xiyan Jiang, Yexin Liu, Junjie Zhou, Ze Liu, Ziyi Xia, Chaofan Li, Haoge Deng, Jiahao Wang, Kun Luo, Bo Zhang, Defu Lian, Xinlong Wang, Zhongyuan Wang, Tiejun Huang, and Zheng Liu. OmniGen2: Ex...

    2025 arXiv

  77. [88]

    FireRed-Image-Edit-1.0 Techinical Report, 2026

    Super Intelligence Team. FireRed-Image-Edit-1.0 Techinical Report, 2026. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2602.13344. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.13344

    2026

  78. [89]

    Bunny-visionpro: Real-time bimanual dexterous teleoperation for imitation learning

    Runyu Ding, Yuzhe Qin, Jiyue Zhu, Chengzhe Jia, Shiqi Yang, Ruihan Yang, Xiaojuan Qi, and Xiaolong Wang. Bunny-visionpro: Real-time bimanual dexterous teleoperation for imitation learning. 2024. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03162. 19 Supplementary Materials A Dataset Resourc...

    2024 arXiv

  79. [2024]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11481

    arXiv

  80. [2025]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23951

    arXiv

  81. [2026]

    URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23570

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.