Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 32 references

A Lapse in the Cosmological Constant Problem with Bulk Dynamics

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that constant shifts of the renormalized matter vacuum energy cancel algebraically from the effective Einstein equations even after dynamics along a compact extra dimension are switched on, leaving only…

desk verdict A solid, honest extension of the sequestering idea that proves vacuum-energy cancellation within a stated slice-local truncation, then openly identifies the Casimir obstruction to going beyond it. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12460 v1 pith:5ORCMJLC submitted 2026-08-12 hep-th gr-qc

Justin Khoury , Benjamin Muntz , Antonio Padilla This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc
keywords cosmologicalconstantproblemvacuum-energycancellationcompactextradimensionprojectablelapsehigher-formfluxkhoronscalarFierz-PauliCasimirenergy
topics Dark Energy
open problems Quantum Gravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends a proposed solution to the cosmological constant problem beyond the ultra-local limit in which the compact extra dimension is inert. Restoring dynamics along the compact direction through z=1 extrinsic-curvature and flux kinetic terms, it claims the central cancellation survives: a constant shift of the renormalized matter vacuum energy drops out algebraically of the effective Einstein equations, and for maximally symmetric vacuum configurations the four-dimensional Ricci scalar must vanish, R^(4)=0. The price is a consistency condition: generic extrinsic-curvature couplings propagate a scalar ghost, and a healthy quadratic spectrum selects the Fierz-Pauli relation between these couplings, realized most simply by five-dimensional Einstein gravity. The paper also shows that if matter itself propagates around the compact direction, finite winding Casimir energies of order $L^{-4}$ appear that the global constraint does not remove, so the mechanism separates the local vacuum-energy problem from topology-sensitive quantum effects.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a compact extra dimension with a projectable lapse N(y), foliation-preserving diffeomorphisms, and a higher-form field whose flux becomes a global integration constant. In the z=1 extension, the gravitational sector acquires extrinsic-curvature terms -$\lambda$ H_mu nu H^mu nu + mu $H^{2}$, and the three-form is lifted to a five-dimensional four-form potential whose kinetic operators involve F4, C4, and their duals; the boundary conditions are chosen so that the same flux combination Q=$P^{2}$-2 $\alpha$ P Q + $\beta$ $Q^{2}$ appears both in the local Einstein equations and in the global lapse constraint. That coincidence lets the global constraint fix the flux average and enforce the vacuum-energy cancellation. In the covariant khoron formulation, a spacelike scalar defines the preferred foliation, an auxiliary einbein imposes the projectable condition X=1/eta, and a multiplier carries the leafwise global constraint; the five-form flux constant $f^{2}$ then shifts rather than sourcing vacuum energy.

What would settle it

Compute the one-loop effective action for a single massless periodic scalar field with s=1 on M4 x S1: the Poisson-resummed calculation gives a leading Casimir energy U(L) proportional to -$L^{-4}$, whose gravitational source U(L)/L - U'(L) is nonzero and would survive the lapse and flux constraint if the paper's claim is correct; explicitly evaluating the residual Einstein equation after imposing the global constraint settles whether this $L^{-4}$ term is really not cancelled.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that vacuum-energy cancellation is a property of the projectable-lapse structure and the global constraint it generates, not of ultra-locality itself. Adding the leading normal-derivative operators to the gravitational and flux sectors, the paper derives effective Einstein equations in which the matter effective action enters only through its dynamical part, with the vacuum-energy coefficient V_vac cancelling term by term. For maximally symmetric backgrounds, periodicity of the compact dimension makes the extrinsic-curvature contribution a total derivative in the extra dimension, so averaging around the circle forces the four-dimensional curvature of the vacuum to vanish regardless of V_vac. The same mechanism is recast covariantly with a spacelike khoron scalar and an auxiliary einbein on leaf space: there, a shift of the renormalized vacuum energy is absorbed by shifts of the multiplier and the five-form flux constant, leaving the intrinsic gravitational equations unchanged. However, matter with normal gradient terms acquires a Kaluza-Klein tower, and non-zero winding around the circle produces finite Casimir contributions with non-extensive dependence on the proper circumference L, which are not automatically cancelled by the global constraint.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the matter effective action factorises slice by slice along the compact direction, with no normal-derivative couplings between different leaves, and that only matter loops are quantized while gravity, the fluxes, and the khoron/constraint sectors are treated classically; if matter propagates around the circle or graviton loops are included, finite winding Casimir terms appear that the mechanism does not cancel.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For maximally symmetric vacuum configurations, the four-dimensional curvature must vanish exactly, R^(4)=0, irrespective of the value of the matter vacuum energy, because the extrinsic-curvature contribution reduces to a total derivative that integrates to zero around the compact direction.
  • A healthy quadratic spectrum requires the Fierz-Pauli relation lambda=mu>0, which removes the scalar ghost from both the non-zero Kaluza-Klein gravitons and the zero-mode shift sector; five-dimensional Einstein gravity, lambda=mu=1, lies on this branch.
  • The covariant khoron realization shows that a constant shift of the renormalized vacuum energy maps to a shift of the multiplier and of f^2, leaving the intrinsic Einstein equations invariant, thereby making the cancellation manifest in a fully five-dimensional diffeomorphism-invariant language.
  • If matter propagates around the compact direction, the leading winding contribution is a finite four-dimensional vacuum energy of order L^-4 that is not removed by the constraint; suppressing it requires a spectral condition such as Str(s_i^4 a_i0)=0 for light periodic fields.
  • Because gravity itself propagates in the bulk in the z=1 theory, graviton loops also produce winding Casimir energies, so the required spectral cancellation must involve the complete set of propagating bulk degrees of freedom, not just the matter sector.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the ultra-local matter assumption is what protects the cancellation from winding contributions; a phenomenological embedding would therefore have to keep Standard Model matter on a single leaf or engineer the bulk spectrum to satisfy the spectral sum rule, making the mechanism testable by the size and topology of the extra dimension.
  • Beyond the paper, the quadratic-order Fierz-Pauli condition leaves open the non-linear completion for lambda=mu but not equal to 1, since that branch is not fully five-dimensional diffeomorphism invariant; non-linear interactions could reintroduce a scalar degree of freedom, and a decoupling-limit calculation could settle it.
  • Beyond the paper, the covariant khoron formulation frames the vacuum-energy shift as a symmetry of the five-dimensional Einstein equations; one can ask whether winding sectors or anomalies break this shift symmetry, which would turn the spectral condition into a sharper consistency requirement.
  • Beyond the paper, computing the one-loop effective action including graviton, khoron, and constraint-sector fluctuations on M4 x S1 would determine explicitly whether any residual bulk spectrum can satisfy the required winding-sum cancellation, connecting the mechanism to spectral cancellations familiar from string-theoretic constructions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper extends a previously proposed z=0 mechanism for the cosmological constant problem, based on anisotropic scaling in a compact extra dimension, to z=1 deformations that restore dynamics along the compact direction. The authors introduce extrinsic-curvature and higher-form kinetic terms, derive the modified field equations and global constraints, and show that constant shifts of the renormalized matter vacuum energy cancel algebraically from the background effective Einstein equations. For maximally symmetric vacua, periodicity in the compact direction enforces vanishing four-dimensional curvature. The paper then analyzes the linearized spectrum, identifies a scalar ghost for generic extrinsic-curvature couplings, and shows that the Fierz-Pauli condition λ=μ removes the ghost. This motivates a covariant formulation using a spacelike khoron scalar and an auxiliary einbein on leaf space, in which the global constraint is implemented covariantly. Finally, the paper relaxes the ultra-local matter assumption and demonstrates that bulk matter propagation generates finite winding Casimir energies that are not cancelled by the global constraint, proposing a spectral condition for their suppression. The treatment is careful about its semiclassical, matter-loop truncation and explicitly acknowledges that graviton loops and bulk matter propagation lie outside the main cancellation mechanism.

Significance. If correct, the paper provides a concrete and calculable framework in which radiative corrections to the matter vacuum energy decouple from the background gravitational equations even after bulk dynamics are restored, extending the earlier z=0 sequestering-like mechanism. The covariant khoron formulation is elegant and makes the global-constraint structure manifest, and the linearized ghost analysis correctly identifies the Fierz-Pauli tuning. The paper is also unusually honest: it explicitly derives the finite, topology-sensitive Casimir contributions that are not removed by the mechanism and states the spectral conditions under which they might be suppressed. The main limitation is that the cancellation is established only in the slice-factorized, matter-loop truncation; once matter or gravitons propagate around the compact direction, the mechanism does not automatically remove the resulting finite vacuum-energy-like terms. This does not invalidate the technical derivation, but it substantially narrows the sense in which the paper solves the cosmological constant problem in a theory with bulk dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. VI, Eqs. (6.11)-(6.17); Sec. III before Eq. (3.11); Sec. V Eq. (5.62)] The central cancellation in Eqs. (3.32) and (5.62) relies on the assumption, stated before Eq. (3.11) and again in footnote 5, that the matter effective action is slice-factorized: it contains no normal-derivative operators and no couplings between distinct leaves. The paper's own calculation in Sec. VI shows that as soon as matter propagates along the compact direction, the one-loop effective action acquires winding Casimir contributions U(L) proportional to L^{-4} that do not satisfy the extensivity condition LU'(L)=U(L) of Eq. (6.17) and are therefore not cancelled by the global constraint. The proposed spectral condition Str(s_i^4 a_0^{(i)})=0 in Eq. (6.18) is not demonstrated for any realistic spectrum, and the full winding sum in Eq. (6.13) contains further mass- and curvature-dependent terms. The claim that the z=1 extension preserves vacuum-energy cancellation is therefore established only within the matter-loop, slice-local truncation; the complete quantum vacuum contribution, including bulk matter propagation, remains an open problem. This scope limitation should be stated prominently in the abstract and in the conclusions, not only in the later discussion.
  2. [Sec. VI, final paragraphs] Because the z=1 gravitational kinetic terms necessarily contain normal derivatives, graviton loops cannot be treated as ultra-local in the compact direction. The paper explicitly acknowledges that their finite-winding part also generates an L^{-4} Casimir energy. This means that the useful distinction between 'local, extensive vacuum energy' (cancelled by the mechanism) and 'topology-sensitive Casimir energy' (requiring spectral control) is not preserved once gravity is quantized: the gravitational winding contribution is not removed by any condition established in the paper. The manuscript should either exhibit a concrete spectral arrangement that cancels the gravitational winding Casimir energy or state unambiguously that the complete quantum theory, including graviton loops, is not covered by the proposed mechanism. As written, the abstract's claim that the mechanism renders the field equations insensitive to radiative corrections to the matter vacuum energy is too strong when compared with the truncated setting in which it is actually derived.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (2.4); Sec. III before Eq. (3.11)] The physical interpretation of the slice-factorized matter action should be clarified. As written, the matter path integral factorizes slice by slice, which appears to describe a continuum of independent four-dimensional matter sectors, one for each leaf, rather than a single Standard Model. The collider bound on the proper length L does not by itself address the resulting continuum of massless modes; a brief comment on how a single four-dimensional matter sector is recovered would be helpful.
  2. [Sec. IV, Eq. (4.30)] There is a typo in the sentence introducing Eq. (4.30): 'For then th Kaluza-Klein mode' should read 'For the n-th Kaluza-Klein mode.' Also, the sign conventions for the ghost mass squared in Eq. (4.30) should be stated explicitly, since the condition for the ghost to lie above the cutoff depends on those conventions.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (3.10)] The modified Neumann boundary condition (3.10) is a central ingredient in the cancellation mechanism, because it ensures that the flux combination Q enters identically in the lapse and metric equations. A short derivation, or at least a more detailed statement of why this is the unique boundary condition compatible with the variational principle, would help readers who are not already familiar with the earlier work in [1].
  4. [Sec. VI, Eqs. (6.13)-(6.18)] The spectral condition Str(s_i^4 a_0^{(i)})=0 in Eq. (6.18) is stated for light, periodic fields. The paper should emphasize that for massive fields or twisted boundary conditions, the condition is not sufficient: cancellation would require control of the full winding sum in Eq. (6.13), including mass- and curvature-dependent subleading terms. The current text mentions this, but the point is important enough to be highlighted in the main conclusion as well.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the vacuum-energy cancellation is derived algebraically from the stated action and constraints, with the paper's own Sec. VI flagging the topological Casimir limitation.

full rationale

The claimed cancellation of the renormalized matter vacuum energy is an algebraic consequence of the stated action and constraints, not an input. In Sec. III B, the split Gamma_m = -V_vac V4 + Gamma_dyn (Eq. 3.31) is a definition of the local extensive vacuum coefficient, and substituting T^(m) = -V_vac g + T^(dyn) into the already-derived effective Einstein equation (3.30) makes the three V_vac terms cancel by explicit arithmetic (Eq. 3.32); no parameter is fitted to data and no quantity is later 'predicted' from a value used to define it. The same holds in the covariant khoron formulation, where Eqs. (5.59)-(5.61) exhibit the algebraic cancellation after the einbein and five-form equations are solved. The paper's use of [1] and of sequestering literature co-authored by one of the authors is contextual: the z=1 calculation is performed in the text, the Fierz-Pauli stability condition is derived from the quadratic action (Sec. IV), and the khoron einbein is introduced as an explicit construction rather than imported as an external uniqueness theorem. The paper itself flags the genuine limitation in Sec. VI and in footnote 5: once matter or gravitons propagate around the compact direction, finite winding Casimir terms U(L) ~ L^-4 do not satisfy LU'(L) = U(L) (Eq. 6.17) and are not cancelled; this is a stated scope boundary of the semiclassical, slice-factorized truncation, not a hidden circular reduction. Because every load-bearing step is derived from the action, constraints, and periodic boundary conditions, there is no fitted input renamed as a prediction and no self-citation chain that forces the result.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The derivation rests on an ultra-local, slice-factorized matter effective action, a renormalisation scheme preserving foliation diffeomorphisms, periodic boundary conditions, and a semiclassical truncation that excludes graviton and higher-form loops. The boundary conditions and the khoron constraint are constructed to make the cancellation work; they are stated assumptions, not fitted parameters. No data are used.

free parameters (4)
  • lambda (extrinsic curvature coefficient) = lambda=mu>0 selected by stability
    Coupling of H_mu_nu H^mu^nu in Eq. (3.2); health condition at quadratic order, not fitted to data.
  • mu (trace extrinsic curvature coefficient) = mu=lambda>0 selected by stability
    Coupling of H^2 in Eq. (3.2); same health condition.
  • alpha (mixed flux kinetic coefficient) = not fixed; can be rescaled to 1 by field redefinition
    Coefficient of F4 wedge *C4 in Eq. (3.8); branch beta != alpha^2 and Lorentz-invariant beta=alpha^2 cases considered.
  • beta (flux kinetic coefficient) = branch beta != alpha^2; Lorentz-invariant beta=alpha^2
    Coefficient of C4 wedge *C4 in Eq. (3.8); appears in flux combination Q in Eq. (3.18).
assumptions (7)
  • standard math ADM decomposition, Gauss-Codazzi relations, heat-kernel expansion, and Poisson resummation are used without proof.
    Background mathematical technology invoked in Secs. II, III, V, VI; standard.
  • domain assumption Matter effective action is ultra-local in y and factorises slice-by-slice.
    Stated before Eq. (3.11); central to cancellation and explicitly relaxed in Sec. VI.
  • domain assumption Renormalisation preserves foliation-preserving diffeomorphisms.
    Stated in footnote 2 of Sec. II; required for Vvac to scale linearly with the projectable lapse.
  • domain assumption Only matter loops are included; gravity, higher-form, khoron, and constraint sectors are classical.
    Stated in Sec. III and Sec. VII; the paper says full loop treatment lies beyond the truncation.
  • domain assumption The compact dimension has periodic boundary conditions and the regulator region on each slice is y-independent.
    Used to drop total y-derivatives; e.g. Eq. (3.28) and periodic warp factor argument.
  • ad hoc to paper Modified Neumann boundary condition (3.10) for the three-form, together with metric boundary condition (2.8), is chosen so the flux combination Q enters identically in the lapse and metric equations.
    Sec. III A; this design makes the vacuum-energy cancellation exact but is not derived from an underlying principle.
  • ad hoc to paper Khoron constraint X=1/eta(Y) with auxiliary einbein eta enforces projectability in the covariant formulation.
    Sec. V A; this is the covariant encoding of the projectable lapse, an imposed structure rather than an output.
invented entities (3)
  • khoron scalar Y
    purpose: Defines the preferred spacelike foliation and projectable lapse in the covariant formulation.
    Introduced as the spacelike analogue of the khronon; no direct observational signature or predicted mass is provided.
  • leaf-space einbein eta(sigma)
    purpose: Supplies the measure over leaves and enforces the projectability constraint X=1/eta(Y).
    Auxiliary field in Sec. V; non-propagating and only fixed by its equation of motion.
  • Lagrange multiplier Xi(X)
    purpose: Enforces the projectability constraint and carries the global shift under vacuum-energy renormalization.
    Auxiliary field in Sec. V; its leaf average is fixed by the einbein equation (5.22); no independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Lapse in the Cosmological Constant Problem with Bulk Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5ORCMJLC

@misc{pith2026260812460,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Lapse in the Cosmological Constant Problem with Bulk Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5ORCMJLC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12460}
}
abstract

We have previously proposed a new approach to the cosmological constant problem based on anisotropic scaling in a compact extra dimension. In the ultra-local $z=0$ limit, the interplay between a projectable lapse, foliation-preserving diffeomorphisms, and higher-form fluxes renders the gravitational field equations insensitive to radiative corrections to the matter vacuum energy. Here we extend this framework beyond the ultra-local limit by introducing $z=1$ deformations that restore dynamics along the compact direction. We show that vacuum-energy cancellation persists at the level of the background equations, while generic extrinsic-curvature couplings propagate an additional scalar ghost. A healthy quadratic spectrum selects the Fierz-Pauli relation between these couplings. This motivates a particularly simple realization in terms of five-dimensional Einstein gravity, a top-form flux, and a spacelike khoron scalar field that dynamically defines a preferred projectable foliation. In this covariant formulation, the global constraint arises from an auxiliary einbein on the space of khoron leaves, and constant shifts of the renormalized matter vacuum energy cancel algebraically from the intrinsic Einstein equations. Finally, allowing matter to propagate around the compact dimension generates finite, topology-sensitive Casimir contributions that are not automatically removed by the mechanism. Suppressing these contributions requires additional spectral conditions on the propagating bulk degrees of freedom.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Lapse in the Cosmological Constant Problem

    J. Khoury, B. Muntz, and A. Padilla, A Lapse in the Cosmological Constant Problem (2026), arXiv:2604.08659 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    Kaloper and A

    N. Kaloper and A. Padilla, Sequestering the standard model vacuum energy, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 091304 (2014), arXiv:1309.6562

    arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Kaloper and A

    N. Kaloper and A. Padilla, Vacuum energy sequestering: The framework and its cosmological consequences, Phys. Rev. D 90, 084023 (2014), arXiv:1406.0711

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Kaloper and A

    N. Kaloper and A. Padilla, Sequestration of Vacuum Energy and the End of the Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 101302 (2015), arXiv:1409.7073 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2015

  5. [5]

    Kaloper, A

    N. Kaloper, A. Padilla, D. Stefanyszyn, and G. Zahariade, Manifestly Local Theory of Vacuum Energy Sequestering, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 051302 (2016), arXiv:1505.01492 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    Kaloper, A

    N. Kaloper, A. Padilla, and D. Stefanyszyn, Sequestering effects on and of vacuum decay, Phys. Rev. D94, 025022 (2016), arXiv:1604.04000 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Kaloper and A

    N. Kaloper and A. Padilla, Vacuum Energy Sequestering and Graviton Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 061303 (2017), arXiv:1606.04958 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    D’Amico, N

    G. D’Amico, N. Kaloper, A. Padilla, D. Stefanyszyn, A. Westphal, and G. Zahariade, An ´ etude on global vacuum energy sequester, JHEP09, 074, arXiv:1705.08950 [hep-th]

    arXiv

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    Padilla, Monodromy inflation and an emergent mechanism for stabilising the cosmological constant, JHEP01, 175, arXiv:1806.04740 [hep-th]

    A. Padilla, Monodromy inflation and an emergent mechanism for stabilising the cosmological constant, JHEP01, 175, arXiv:1806.04740 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Coltman, Y

    B. Coltman, Y. Li, and A. Padilla, Cosmological consequences of Omnia Sequestra, JCAP06, 017, arXiv:1903.02829 [hep-th]

    1903 arXiv

  3. [11]

    B. K. El-Menoufi, S. Nagy, F. Niedermann, and A. Padilla, Quantum corrections to vacuum energy sequestering (with monodromy), Class. Quant. Grav.36, 215014 (2019), arXiv:1903.07612 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Fierz and W

    M. Fierz and W. Pauli, On relativistic wave equations for particles of arbitrary spin in an electromagnetic field, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A173, 211 (1939)

    1939

  5. [13]

    Sanner, N

    C. Sanner, N. Huntemann, R. Lange, C. Tamm, E. Peik, M. S. Safronova, and S. G. Porsev, Optical clock comparison for Lorentz symmetry testing, Nature567, 204 (2019), arXiv:1809.10742 [physics.atom-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    E. M. Lifshitz, On the theory of second-order phase transitions i, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.11, 255 (1941)

    1941

  7. [15]

    E. M. Lifshitz, On the theory of second-order phase transitions ii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.11, 269 (1941)

    1941

  8. [16]

    R. M. Hornreich, M. Luban, and S. Shtrikman, Critical behavior at the onset of ⃗k-space instability on theλline, Phys. Rev. Lett.35, 1678 (1975)

    1975

  9. [17]

    Hoˇ rava, Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys

    P. Hoˇ rava, Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. D79, 084008 (2009), arXiv:0901.3775 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Hoˇ rava, Spectral Dimension of the Universe in Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys

    P. Hoˇ rava, Spectral Dimension of the Universe in Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 161301 (2009), arXiv:0902.3657 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D15, 2752 (1977)

    1977

  13. [21]

    M. J. Duncan and L. G. Jensen, Four Forms and the Cosmological Constant, Nucl. Phys. B336, 100 (1990)

    1990

  14. [22]

    S. M. Carroll and G. N. Remmen, A Nonlocal Approach to the Cosmological Constant Problem, Phys. Rev. D95, 123504 (2017), arXiv:1703.09715 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Bellorin, C

    J. Bellorin, C. Borquez, and B. Droguett, Quantization of the anisotropic conformal Hoˇ rava theory, Phys. Rev. D108, 044035 (2023), arXiv:2304.08646 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Van Nieuwenhuizen, On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation, Nucl

    P. Van Nieuwenhuizen, On ghost-free tensor lagrangians and linearized gravitation, Nucl. Phys. B60, 478 (1973)

    1973

  17. [25]

    Hinterbichler, Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity, Rev

    K. Hinterbichler, Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 671 (2012), arXiv:1105.3735 [hep-th]

    2012 arXiv

  18. [26]

    D. Blas, O. Pujolas, and S. Sibiryakov, Models of non-relativistic quantum gravity: The Good, the bad and the healthy, JHEP04, 018, arXiv:1007.3503 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    J. J. van der Bij, H. van Dam, and Y. J. Ng, The Exchange of Massless Spin Two Particles, Physica A116, 307 (1982)

    1982

  20. [28]

    Buchmuller and N

    W. Buchmuller and N. Dragon, Einstein Gravity From Restricted Coordinate Invariance, Phys. Lett. B207, 292 (1988)

    1988

  21. [29]

    Buchmuller and N

    W. Buchmuller and N. Dragon, Gauge Fixing and the Cosmological Constant, Phys. Lett. B223, 313 (1989)

    1989

  22. [30]

    Padilla and I

    A. Padilla and I. D. Saltas, A note on classical and quantum unimodular gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C75, 561 (2015), arXiv:1409.3573 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  23. [31]

    D. V. Vassilevich, Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual, Phys. Rept.388, 279 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0306138

    2003 arXiv

  24. [32]

    S. Abel, K. R. Dienes, and E. Mavroudi, Towards a nonsupersymmetric string phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D91, 126014 (2015), arXiv:1502.03087 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.