Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 51 references

Probing CP-violating top-quark dipole moments with tomographic observables

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that CP-violating top-quark dipole moments can be probed cleanly through CP-odd Fano observables and an optimal weight $O_{\rm opt}=f_1/f_0$, reaching 10–15 TeV at FCC-ee and 40–200 TeV at the LHC.

desk verdict A real no-go theorem for discord-based CP probes buried in an otherwise standard tomography paper whose reach projections rest on an unvalidated statistics-only assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12463 v1 pith:2TCETJRF submitted 2026-08-12 hep-ph

Maxim Perelstein , Minal Shaik , Taewook Youn This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords topquarkCPviolationelectricdipolemomentchromo-electricspindensitymatrixquantumtomographyFanocoefficientsoptimalobservable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the spin density matrix of top–antitop pairs, reconstructed from dilepton angular correlations, contains CP-violation observables that are exactly zero in the Standard Model and cleanly populated by the top-quark electric and chromo-electric dipole moments. Symmetry alone fixes which Fano coefficients are CP-odd: the normal-polarization difference $\Delta B_n$ and the antisymmetric normal-plane correlations $A_{rn}$ and $A_{kn}$. The paper computes the production density matrix analytically for $e^+e^-$, $q\bar q$, and $gg$ initial states, builds the statistically optimal per-event weight $O_{\rm opt}=f_1/f_0$, and takes the whole program through fast detector simulation at the FCC-ee and the LHC. It projects 95% CL reaches on the inverse dipole couplings of $10$–$15$ TeV for the electroweak dipoles at FCC-ee and roughly $40$ TeV (Run 2) to $200$ TeV (HL-LHC) for the top chromo-EDM, exceeding the traditional triple- and quadruple-product observables. It also establishes a no-go result: the recently proposed top–antitop discord asymmetry vanishes identically for these couplings and cannot serve as a CP probe.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Fano decomposition of the $t\bar t$ production spin density matrix, $\rho=\frac{1}{4}\left(1\otimes 1+\sum_i B^+_i\,\sigma_i\otimes 1+\sum_j B^-_j\,1\otimes\sigma_j+\sum_{ij}C_{ij}\,\sigma_i\otimes\sigma_j\right)$, evaluated in the helicity basis $\{\hat k,\hat r,\hat n\}$ built from the top direction and the production plane. CP symmetry interchanges top and antitop and transposes $C$, so the CP-odd combinations are $\Delta B_i=B^+_i-B^-_i$ and $A_{ij}=C_{ij}-C_{ji}$; naive time reversal leaves only $\Delta B_n$, $A_{rn}$, and $A_{kn}$ as tree-level observables for the real dipoles. The paper supplies closed-form analytic expressions for the Fano coefficients in the SM, SM–dipole interference, and dipole-squared orders for all three production channels, and it defines the optimal observable $O_{\rm opt}=f_1/f_0$ as the per-event ratio of the two density terms, which for a CP-odd dipole becomes the angle-weighted combination of $\Delta B_n$, $A_{rn}$, and $A_{kn}$ and saturates the Cramér–Rao bound by a Cauchy–Schwarz argument.

What would settle it

Measure the reconstructed CP-odd observables $A_{rn}$ and $O_{\rm opt}$ on a large pure-Standard-Model dilepton top sample passed through the same kinematic-fit reconstruction and check whether the sample means are consistent with zero within the statistical error; any offset comparable to $\sigma_{\rm stat}$, or a systematic uncertainty of that size, would invalidate the projected reaches.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that CP violation in the top dipole sector is carried, at tree level, entirely by a small set of Fano coefficients of the two-qubit $t\bar t$ density matrix: the polarization difference $\Delta B_n = B^+_n - B^-_n$ and the antisymmetric normal-plane correlations $A_{rn}=C_{rn}-C_{nr}$ and $A_{kn}=C_{kn}-C_{nk}$. These combinations are forced to zero by CP conservation in the Standard Model and in any CP-conserving extension, and the real electric and chromo-electric dipoles are the sole source that populates them at linear order; the paper verifies this pattern both analytically and in Monte Carlo. The paper further proves that the optimal weight $O_{\rm opt}=f_1/f_0$, defined as the ratio of the linear-dipole to Standard-Model differential cross sections, is the most sensitive per-event observable, saturating the Cramér–Rao bound, and that after detector effects it still outperforms the conventional triple- and quadruple-product observables at both colliders. Finally, it proves a no-go theorem: for these couplings the top–antitop discord asymmetry vanishes identically, so quantum-information measures of the density matrix are blind to this CP violation at tree level.

Load-bearing premise

The quoted reaches assume that the detector-level Standard Model expectation of each CP-odd observable is exactly zero with negligible uncertainty and that detector systematics stay below the statistical uncertainty, so the background-subtracted limit reduces to the statistics-only formula.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The tomographic observables $A_{rn}$ and $O_{\rm opt}$ give LHC searches for the top chromo-EDM a detector-level reach beyond the conventional quadruple product: about $41$ TeV at Run 2 and $191$ TeV at HL-LHC.
  • At FCC-ee, the optimal observable projects sensitivity to electroweak dipole scales of $12$–$15$ TeV, with the parton-level reach growing monotonically if the collision energy is raised toward $1$ TeV.
  • The no-go theorem means discord, steering, and related correlation asymmetries should not be used as CP-violation probes in $t\bar t$, since their $t\leftrightarrow\bar t$ asymmetries are forced to zero by the same structural conditions that hold for any Hermitian tree-level addition to the SM.
  • The same reconstructed spin density matrix used for entanglement measurements can be reweighted by $O_{\rm opt}$ at no extra experimental cost, turning an existing quantum-tomography analysis into a CP search.
  • Because the CP-odd observable combinations vanish in the SM only up to negligible three-loop corrections, a nonzero measurement of any of them at the projected sensitivities would be an unambiguous discovery of new CP-violating physics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proof structure suggests a broader blindness theorem: any Hermitian tree-level new-physics operator that leaves the density matrix invariant under combined spin-swap and normal-axis reflection will produce zero discord, steering, and related correlation asymmetries, so CP probes based on those measures may be generically insensitive to tree-level CP violation.
  • The same Fano-coefficient logic could be transplanted to other two-qubit final states such as $W^+W^-$ or $\tau^+\tau^-$ pairs, where analogous CP-odd normal-plane correlations should exist and could be measured from angular distributions.
  • A data-driven calibration of the statistics-only assumption is testable: measure the CP-odd observables on CP-conserving control samples with the same reconstruction, and if a systematic offset of order $\sigma_{\rm stat}$ appears, the relative advantage of $O_{\rm opt}$ over robust products would shrink; the paper leaves that quantification to experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a set of CP-odd observables constructed from the reconstructed spin density matrix of top-quark pairs, and uses them to project sensitivities to the top electric and chromo-electric dipole moments at FCC-ee and the LHC. The observables are the Fano-coefficient combinations Delta B_n, A_rn, A_kn of Eq. (2.5), which are argued to vanish in the CP-conserving SM and to receive contributions only from CP-violating dipole couplings at linear order. The paper also constructs an 'optimal observable' O_opt = f_1/f_0, the score of the SM hypothesis, proves its parton-level optimality in Appendix A, provides closed-form spin density matrices in Appendix B, and carries the analysis from parton level to a Delphes-based fast detector simulation. A no-go theorem is proved showing that the top-antitop discord asymmetry vanishes identically for the dipole operators, contradicting a recent claim. The projected 95% CL reaches are 10-15 TeV for the electroweak dipoles at FCC-ee and 40 (200) TeV for the chromo-EDM at LHC Run 2 (HL-LHC).

Significance. If the projected sensitivities hold, the paper provides a new class of CP-violation searches in top-quark production with competitive reach, and it clarifies the structure of quantum-information observables as CP probes through a clean no-go theorem. The analytic spin density matrices for e+e-, q qbar, and gg channels, cross-checked against MadGraph, are a useful resource. The optimality proof in Appendix A is a correct application of the score-function/CRB argument, and the SM-reconstruction checks show no spurious CP-odd bias. The main caveat is that the detector-level reach projections rely on an unvalidated assumption about the size of SM-reference and systematic uncertainties.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 4, Eq. (4.3); Secs. 5.2, 6.2] The collapse of the background-subtracted limit Eq. (4.3) to the statistics-only form Eq. (4.2) is not validated. Condition (ii) of that collapse requires sigma_SM and sigma_syst to be much smaller than sigma_stat, but the paper only verifies condition (i) and asserts (ii). The quoted SM-reference uncertainties are not subdominant: at FCC-ee, A_SM,reco_rn = 0.07 +/- 0.05 with sigma_Arn = 4.2 and N ~ 4x10^4 gives sigma_stat ~ 0.02, so the reported +/- 0.05 exceeds sigma_stat by a factor of 2.5. Including sigma_SM in Eq. (4.3) would degrade the A_rn reach by roughly sqrt(1+(0.05/0.02)^2) ~ 2.7, directly affecting the headline reaches in Tables 4 and 6, which are computed from Eq. (4.2). The authors should either generate a sufficiently large SM control sample to demonstrate sigma_SM << sigma_stat, or propagate sigma_SM into the quoted reaches.
  2. [Sec. 4; Secs. 5, 6] The detector-level analysis uses only t tbar signal samples; no background samples are generated or included in the efficiency, dilution, or sigma_stat. Equation (4.3) mentions residual backgrounds, but the projections do not quantify them. At the LHC, Standard Model backgrounds such as W+W- and single top could dilute the CP-odd observables and increase the effective sigma_stat, potentially reducing the Run 2 and HL-LHC reaches beyond the ~20% effect inferred from the O1 validation in Sec. 6.2. The authors should either include a background estimate in the projections or state and justify the assumption that backgrounds are negligible.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 1] The abstract contains grammatical errors: 'This sensitivities exceed those of the traditional observables currently used by experiments to use for these operators' should read 'These sensitivities exceed those of the traditional observables currently used by experiments for these operators.'
  2. [Sec. 2.2] There are typos: 'teh model' should be 'the model' and 'describeb' should be 'described'.
  3. [Sec. 6.2] The phrase 'a st of realistic CMS-like selection criteria' should read 'a set of realistic CMS-like selection criteria'.
  4. [Table 1] The table row entries '1342' and '3842' appear as single numbers; based on the text and Table 4, these should be two entries ('13' and '42' for d_gamma; '38' and '42' for d_Z). Please correct the formatting.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Optimal-observable optimality is definitional (score function), but no hidden fit or load-bearing self-citation; reach projections are self-contained.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.5); Appendix A, Eqs. (A.2)-(A.3)]
    "Writing the dilepton distribution at linear order in a dipole coupling d as dσ= [f0(Ω)+df1(Ω)+O(d2)]dΩ, Oopt(Ω)=f1(Ω)/f0(Ω) ... the mean of the per-event weight Oopt is the statistically optimal estimator of d: it saturates the Cramér–Rao bound."

    O_opt is, by construction, the score function f1/f0, and the Cramér-Rao bound is a theorem about the score. The claim that O_opt has maximal statistical sensitivity is therefore a property of its definition rather than an independent physical prediction. The paper also evaluates the gains of O_opt using the same theoretical f0/f1 density matrix that defines the estimator, so the direction of the comparison is fixed by construction. This is transparent and does not hide a fit to data; the magnitude of the reach still depends on the model's f0/f1 and on the detector simulation, so this is a mild definitional circularity rather than a loaded result.

full rationale

Apart from the definitional optimality of O_opt, the paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The CP-odd Fano combinations of Eq. (2.5) are obtained from the explicit analytic spin density matrices in Appendix B and are verified numerically against the MadGraph implementation, so the selection of observables is not fitted to the reaches. The no-go theorem for the discord asymmetry is proven directly from the stated conditions on the Fano coefficients and from invariance under local antiunitary and swap operations, not from a self-citation or from the target conclusion. The detector-level reach estimates use Monte Carlo response slopes, reconstruction dilutions, and selection efficiencies; no numerical parameter is fitted to external data. The collapse of Eq. (4.3) to the statistics-only Eq. (4.2) is an acknowledged assumption about systematics, not a circular reduction. The only element that is true by construction is the statistical optimality of the score-based weight O_opt, which earns a low score but does not undermine the independent content of the analytic Fano calculations, the CP-odd selection rules, or the detector-level projections.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central reach is computed from analytic Fano coefficients, Standard Model inputs, and simulation-derived efficiencies and dilutions; no coupling constant is fitted to external data. The only numerically tuned objects are analysis working points, such as cut values and the single-b-tag category, which are chosen to maximize reach and are disclosed in Tables 3 and 5. No new particles or forces are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Charged leptons from dileptonic top decays act as perfect spin analyzers (alpha=1) and the spin density matrix is reconstructed from ensemble averages via Eq. (3.1).
    Used throughout to convert angular moments into Fano coefficients; standard in ttbar spin physics but assumed without including O(alpha_s) corrections to the analyzer power.
  • standard math CP interchanges top and antitop with the antitop-conjugated analyzer convention, mapping B+ to B- and C to C^T, and only the normal axis nhat is T-odd, so only Delta B_n, A_rn, A_kn are CP-odd at tree level.
    Symmetry convention of Sec. 2.2; tree-level amplitudes without absorptive phases make the T-even CP-odd combinations vanish.
  • domain assumption The SM expectation of all CP-odd observables is exactly zero at amplitude level and detector reconstruction does not bias it.
    Needed for background subtraction; the paper verifies on SM Monte Carlo that A_rn^SM,reco = 0.07 +/- 0.05 at FCC-ee and similar at the LHC, but residual bias is assumed negligible.
  • domain assumption Detector systematics are subdominant to statistical uncertainties so that Eq. (4.3) reduces to Eq. (4.2).
    Explicitly assumed in Sec. 4; no systematic model is built and no systematic error budget appears in the projected reaches.
  • domain assumption Linear response in the dipole coupling is sufficient at the projected sensitivities and O(d^2) terms are negligible.
    Sec. 4 estimates d^2 f2/f0 ~ 2e-4 at d95 at FCC-ee; used throughout for the optimal observable and the reach formula.
  • domain assumption The FeynRules/MadGraph implementation of the dipole Lagrangians in Eqs. (1.1) and (1.2) faithfully represents the analytic amplitude.
    Used for all parton-level and detector-level samples; verified against the analytic Fano coefficients in Secs. 5 and 6.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing CP-violating top-quark dipole moments with tomographic observables." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2TCETJRF

@misc{pith2026260812463,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing CP-violating top-quark dipole moments with tomographic observables},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2TCETJRF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12463}
}
abstract

Quantum tomography program reconstructs the full spin density matrix of top-quark pairs from dilepton angular correlations at both electron-positron and hadron colliders. We use symmetry arguments to identify tomographic observables sensitive to CP violation in top quark couplings. As a concrete example, we study the sensitivity of these observables to (chromo-)electric dipole moment operators at the LHC and the FCC-ee. We also construct the optimal observable, which combines tomographic and kinematic information to achieve statistically optimal sensitivity for each operator and production process. The analysis is based on fast detector simulation of top pair production and decay in the dilepton channel. We project a $95\%$ CL sensitivity to new-physics scales (the inverse dipole couplings) of $10-15$ TeV for the electroweak electric dipoles at the FCC-ee ($365$ GeV, $3~{\rm ab}^{-1}$) and of 40 (200) TeV for the top chromo-electric dipole moment at the LHC Run 2 (HL-LHC). This sensitivities exceed those of the traditional observables currently used by experiments to use for these operators, indicating the power of the tomographic approach to search for CP violation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [38]

    Quantumness of top quark pairs produced at LHC within SMEFT framework

    A. Subba and Y. Shi,Quantumness of top quark pairs produced at LHC within SMEFT framework,2605.12033

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [1]

    Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh

    A.D. Sakharov,Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe,Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5(1967) 32

    1967

  3. [2]

    Farrar and M.E

    G.R. Farrar and M.E. Shaposhnikov,Baryon asymmetry of the universe in the standard electroweak theory,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 774 [hep-ph/9305275]

    arXiv 1994

  4. [3]

    Atwood, S

    D. Atwood, S. Bar-Shalom, G. Eilam and A. Soni,CP violation in top physics,Phys. Rept.347(2001) 1 [hep-ph/0006032]

    arXiv 2001

  5. [4]

    Kamenik, M

    J.F. Kamenik, M. Papucci and A. Weiler,Constraining the dipole moments of the top quark,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 071501 [1107.3143]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [5]

    Czarnecki and B

    A. Czarnecki and B. Krause,Neutron electric dipole moment in the standard model: Valence quark contributions,Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997) 4339 [hep-ph/9704355]

    arXiv 1997

  7. [6]

    CP violating anomalous top-quark couplings at the LHC

    S.K. Gupta, A.S. Mete and G. Valencia,CP violating anomalous top-quark couplings at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 034013 [0905.1074]. [7]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of quantum entanglement with top quarks at the ATLAS detector,Nature633(2024) 542 [2311.07288]. [8]CMScollaboration,Observation of quantum entanglement in top quark pair production in proton...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  8. [9]

    Kane, G.A

    G.L. Kane, G.A. Ladinsky and C.P. Yuan,Using the Top Quark for Testing Standard Model Polarization and CP Predictions,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 124

    work page 1992

Show all 51 references
  1. [10]

    Bernreuther and A

    W. Bernreuther and A. Brandenburg,Tracing CP violation in the production of top quark pairs by multiple TeV proton proton collisions,Phys. Rev. D49(1994) 4481 [hep-ph/9312210]

    1994 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Mahlon and S.J

    G. Mahlon and S.J. Parke,Angular correlations in top quark pair production and decay at hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 4886 [hep-ph/9512264]. – 37 –

    1996 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Bernreuther, D

    W. Bernreuther, D. Heisler and Z.-G. Si,A set of top quark spin correlation and polarization observables for the LHC: Standard Model predictions and new physics contributions,JHEP12(2015) 026 [1508.05271]. [13]ATLAScollaboration,Observation of spin correlation int ¯tevents fro...

    2015 arXiv

  4. [16]

    Czarnecki, M

    A. Czarnecki, M. Jezabek and J.H. Kuhn,Lepton Spectra From Decays of Polarized Top Quarks,Nucl. Phys. B351(1991) 70

    1991

  5. [17]

    Afik and J.R.M

    Y. Afik and J.R.M. de Nova,Entanglement and quantum tomography with top quarks at the LHC,Eur. Phys. J. Plus136(2021) 907 [2003.02280]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [18]

    Rahaman and R.K

    R. Rahaman and R.K. Singh,Breaking down the entire spectrum of spin correlations of a pair of particles involving fermions and gauge bosons,Nucl. Phys. B984(2022) 115984 [2109.09345]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [19]

    Afik and J.R.M

    Y. Afik and J.R.M. de Nova,Quantum information with top quarks in QCD, Quantum6(2022) 820 [2203.05582]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [20]

    Fabbrichesi, R

    M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini and G. Panizzo,Testing Bell Inequalities at the LHC with Top-Quark Pairs,Phys. Rev. Lett.127(2021) 161801 [2102.11883]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [21]

    Severi, C.D.E

    C. Severi, C.D.E. Boschi, F. Maltoni and M. Sioli,Quantum tops at the LHC: from entanglement to Bell inequalities,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 285 [2110.10112]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [22]

    Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A

    J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and J.A. Casas,Improved tests of entanglement and Bell inequalities with LHC tops,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 666 [2205.00542]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [23]

    Afik and J.R.M

    Y. Afik and J.R.M. de Nova,Quantum Discord and Steering in Top Quarks at the LHC,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 221801 [2209.03969]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [24]

    T. Han, M. Low, N. McGinnis and S. Su,Measuring quantum discord at the LHC, JHEP05(2025) 081 [2412.21158]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [25]

    A.J. Barr, M. Fabbrichesi, R. Floreanini, E. Gabrielli and L. Marzola,Quantum entanglement and Bell inequality violation at colliders,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.139 (2024) 104134 [2402.07972]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [26]

    Aoude, E

    R. Aoude, E. Madge, F. Maltoni and L. Mantani,Quantum SMEFT tomography: Top quark pair production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 055007 [2203.05619]. – 38 –

    2022 arXiv

  15. [27]

    Severi and E

    C. Severi and E. Vryonidou,Quantum entanglement and top spin correlations in SMEFT at higher orders,JHEP01(2023) 148 [2210.09330]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [28]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of new physics in top-quark pair production at the LHC,JHEP03(2024) 099 [2401.08751]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [29]

    Maltoni, C

    F. Maltoni, C. Severi, S. Tentori and E. Vryonidou,Quantum tops at circular lepton colliders,JHEP09(2024) 001 [2404.08049]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [30]

    Cao and F

    H. Cao and F. Petriello,Single-spin measurements and heavy new physics in the e+e- to ttbar process at an FCC-ee,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 035033 [2511.01994]

    2026

  19. [31]

    Bernreuther, O

    W. Bernreuther, O. Nachtmann, P. Overmann and T. Schr¨ oder,Angular correlations and distributions for searches of CP violation in top quark production and decay, Nucl. Phys. B388(1992) 53. [32]CMScollaboration,Search for CP violating top quark couplings in pp collisions at√s=...

    1992 arXiv

  20. [33]

    Garosi, D

    F. Garosi, D. Marzocca, A.R. S´ anchez and A. Stanzione,Indirect constraints on top quark operators from a global SMEFT analysis,JHEP12(2023) 129 [2310.00047]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [34]

    Bisal,Constraining ALP-top interaction from the chromoelectric dipole moment of the top quark,Phys

    S. Bisal,Constraining ALP-top interaction from the chromoelectric dipole moment of the top quark,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 055027 [2507.12570]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [35]

    T. Han, D. Liu and S. Wang,Top quark electroweak dipole moment at a high energy muon collider,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 035015 [2410.11015]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [36]

    Janot,Top-quark electroweak couplings at the FCC-ee,JHEP04(2015) 182 [1503.01325]

    P. Janot,Top-quark electroweak couplings at the FCC-ee,JHEP04(2015) 182 [1503.01325]

    2015 arXiv

  24. [37]

    Bernreuther, L

    W. Bernreuther, L. Chen, I. Garc´ ıa, M. Perell´ o, R. Poeschl, F. Richard et al., CP-violating top quark couplings at future lineare +e− colliders,Eur. Phys. J. C78 (2018) 155 [1710.06737]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [39]

    Alloul, N.D

    A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks,FeynRules 2.0 - A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 2250 [1310.1921]

    2014 arXiv

  26. [40]

    Degrande, C

    C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter,UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output,Comput. Phys. Commun.183(2012) 1201 [1108.2040]

    2012 arXiv

  27. [41]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer et al.,The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations,JHEP07(2014) 079 [1405.0301]

    2014 arXiv

  28. [42]

    Ollivier and W.H

    H. Ollivier and W.H. Zurek,Introducing Quantum Discord,Phys. Rev. Lett.88 (2001) 017901 [quant-ph/0105072]. – 39 –

    2001 arXiv

  29. [43]

    Henderson and V

    L. Henderson and V. Vedral,Classical, quantum and total correlations,J. Phys. A 34(2001) 6899 [quant-ph/0105028]

    2001 arXiv

  30. [44]

    Luo,Quantum discord for two-qubit systems,Phys

    S. Luo,Quantum discord for two-qubit systems,Phys. Rev. A77(2008) 042303

    2008

  31. [45]

    Daki´ c, V

    B. Daki´ c, V. Vedral and v. Brukner,Necessary and Sufficient Condition for Nonzero Quantum Discord,Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 190502 [1004.0190]

    2010 arXiv

  32. [46]

    Wiseman, S.J

    H.M. Wiseman, S.J. Jones and A.C. Doherty,Steering, Entanglement, Nonlocality, and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox,Phys. Rev. Lett.98(2007) 140402 [quant-ph/0612147]

    2007 arXiv

  33. [47]

    Jevtic, M.J.W

    S. Jevtic, M.J.W. Hall, M.R. Anderson, M. Zwierz and H.M. Wiseman, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering and the steering ellipsoid,J. Opt. Soc. Am. B32 (2015) A40 [1411.1517]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [48]

    Mahlon and S.J

    G. Mahlon and S.J. Parke,Spin Correlation Effects in Top Quark Pair Production at the LHC,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 074024 [1001.3422]

    2010 arXiv

  35. [49]

    Atwood and A

    D. Atwood and A. Soni,Analysis for magnetic moment and electric dipole moment form-factors of the top quark viae +e−→t ¯t,Phys. Rev. D45(1992) 2405

    1992

  36. [50]

    Diehl and O

    M. Diehl and O. Nachtmann,Optimal observables for the measurement of three gauge boson couplings ine +e−→W +W−,Z. Phys. C62(1994) 397

    1994

  37. [51]

    Bernreuther and P

    W. Bernreuther and P. Overmann,Probing Higgs boson and supersymmetry induced CP violation in top quark production by (un)polarized electron - positron collisions, Z. Phys. C72(1996) 461 [hep-ph/9511256]

    1996 arXiv

  38. [52]

    Bartl, E

    A. Bartl, E. Christova, T. Gajdosik and W. Majerotto,CP violating energy asymmetries of b and anti-b quarks ine +e−→t ¯t,Phys. Rev. D59(1999) 077503 [hep-ph/9803426]

    1999 arXiv

  39. [53]

    Durieux, M

    G. Durieux, M. Perell´ o, M. Vos and C. Zhang,Global and optimal probes for the top-quark effective field theory at future lepton colliders,JHEP10(2018) 168 [1807.02121]

    2018 arXiv

  40. [54]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J.R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. Desai, P. Ilten et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2,Comput. Phys. Commun.191(2015) 159 [1410.3012]. [55]DELPHES 3collaboration,DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment,JHEP02(20...

    2015 arXiv

  41. [59]

    Hayreter and G

    A. Hayreter and G. Valencia,T-odd correlations from the top-quark chromoelectric – 40 – dipole moment in lepton plus jets top-pair events,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 014020 [1511.01464]

    2016 arXiv

  42. [60]

    Lamba, F

    P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, O. Miniati and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of CP violation in thet ¯tsystem: production,2607.25029

    arXiv

  43. [61]

    Lamba, F

    P. Lamba, F. Maltoni, O. Miniati and E. Vryonidou,Quantum detection of CP violation in thet ¯tsystem: tomography,2607.25034. – 41 –

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.