Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 68 references

A Minkowski-core black hole with cosmological constant and electric charge

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Adding electric charge and a cosmological constant to the Minkowski-core black hole leaves its singularity-free center intact and puts the AdS phase transition under the control of the regularization parameter.

desk verdict A new charged (A)dS Minkowski-core solution family with a real entropy-limit error and an unverified matter-coupling assumption; worth refereeing after fixes. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.12800 v1 pith:EF4PTR67 submitted 2026-08-13 gr-qc

Wen-Zheng Chen , Shulan Li , Jian-Pin Wu , Cong Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 04.70.-s04.60.-m
keywords Minkowski-coreblackholeregularcovarianteffectiveHamiltonianinverseconstructioncosmologicalconstantelectricchargethermodynamicsphasetransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the Minkowski-core regular black hole — a geometry whose center is flat rather than singular — survives the addition of electric charge and a cosmological constant, and that the extension is a genuine solution of a covariant effective Hamiltonian theory built without exotic matter. The central object is the metric function $f(x) = 1 - 2m e^{-\alpha x^{-n}}/x + Q^2 e^{-\alpha x^{-n}}/x^2 - (\Lambda/3)x^2 e^{-\alpha x^{-n}}$, which the authors derive in two different coordinate gauges and show to describe one and the same spacetime. They claim that the Kretschmann scalar (the standard curvature-squared measure) vanishes at the center, so neither charge nor $\Lambda$ re-introduces a singularity, and that in the AdS case the temperature, heat capacity, and free energy signal a first-order phase transition when the regularization parameter $\alpha$ lies below a critical value, with the transition absent above it. A careful reader would care because the regularity here comes from the gravitational sector itself, avoiding the exotic matter that most regular black hole constructions require, and because the phase structure is a concrete, in-principle observable difference from the Reissner–Nordström–AdS benchmark.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the covariant effective Hamiltonian constraint in the form of Eq. (9), built from an effective mass function $M_{\rm eff}$ and a structure function $\mu$ (a phase-space function encoding the deformed closure of the constraint algebra), subject to the covariance equations (10)–(11). An inverse reconstruction procedure converts a prescribed static spherically symmetric metric into such an $M_{\rm eff}$ and $H^G_{\rm eff}$, making that metric the unique static vacuum solution of the theory. The paper then appends the classical spherically reduced Maxwell Hamiltonian and the cosmological-constant term to this constraint, Eq. (20), and solves the resulting equations of motion in two gauges. This machinery transfers the regularization out of the matter sector and into the gravitational Hamiltonian itself, while the covariance equations are what guarantee the resulting metric is diffeomorphism-invariant and therefore gauge independent.

What would settle it

Compute the Poisson bracket $\{H^T_{\rm eff}[N_1], H^T_{\rm eff}[N_2]\}$ for the total constraint of Eq. (20), with the Maxwell and $\Lambda$ terms included. If the result is not $H^T_x[\mu E^1 (N_1 \partial_x N_2 - N_2 \partial_x N_1)/(E^2)^2]$ with the same structure function $\mu$ as the vacuum theory, then the gauge-independence claim for the metric (21) fails; this is a direct algebraic check using only the paper's Eqs. (7), (16), and (19).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the spacetime with $f(x) = 1 - 2m e^{-\alpha x^{-n}}/x + Q^2 e^{-\alpha x^{-n}}/x^2 - (\Lambda/3)x^2 e^{-\alpha x^{-n}}$ is the static, spherically symmetric charged (A)dS extension of the Minkowski-core black hole inside a generally covariant effective Hamiltonian theory. Solving the equations of motion in the Schwarzschild gauge and in the Painlevé–Gullstrand gauge (a coordinate choice with a nonzero shift vector) produces line elements that differ only by a coordinate transformation, which the authors take as proof of gauge independence. The regularity statement is quantitative: as $x \to 0$ the metric function tends to 1 and the Kretschmann scalar vanishes exponentially fast, while at spatial infinity it tends to $8\Lambda^2/3$; the horizon structure (two horizons, one degenerate extremal horizon, or none) mirrors the Reissner–Nordström–AdS pattern with the inner region regularized. For AdS, the first law gains a new conjugate pair $(\Phi_\alpha, \alpha)$, and the entropy obtained from $S = \int dM/T$ deviates from the Bekenstein–Hawking area law, acquiring a logarithmic correction for $n=2$; for $\alpha$ below a critical value the free energy develops a swallowtail loop, the signature of a first-order phase transition, which disappears once $\alpha$ exceeds that value.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the assumption that adding the ordinary electric and cosmological-constant terms to the modified gravitational Hamiltonian preserves the self-consistency of the theory's constraints; if that closure fails, the claimed spacetime would not be a generally covariant solution of the theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The charged and (A)dS-extended Minkowski-core solution is gauge independent, so physical predictions computed from the Schwarzschild form or from the Painlevé–Gullstrand form refer to the same spacetime.
  • In the limit $\alpha \to 0$, the metric, temperature, entropy, and first law reduce exactly to the Reissner–Nordström–AdS ones, restoring the area-law entropy and giving a clean benchmark from which all regularization effects are measured.
  • For $\Lambda < 0$ and $\alpha$ below a critical value $\alpha_p$, the black hole undergoes a first-order phase transition, signalled by two turning points in the temperature, two divergences in the heat capacity, and a swallowtail loop in the free energy; above $\alpha_p$ the transition disappears and a single stable phase remains.
  • Neither electric charge nor the cosmological constant spoils the Minkowski core: the metric approaches flat Minkowski geometry at the center and the Kretschmann scalar vanishes there for generic parameter values.
  • The entropy deviates from the Bekenstein–Hawking area law, and for $n=2$ it acquires a logarithmic correction, placing this model alongside quantum-gravity entropy calculations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inverse-construction route is metric-driven, so the same recipe should produce charged (A)dS extensions of other regular metrics such as the Hayward, Bardeen, or Frolov families, each with its own critical parameter; the paper flags this as future work but gives no reason beyond solvability of the reconstruction equation why it should fail.
  • Because the regularization factor $e^{-\alpha x^{-n}}$ decays exponentially away from the center, this model is observationally distinguishable from Reissner–Nordström–AdS mainly at small radius, through ringdown echoes or photon-ring images, while large-radius thermodynamics converge to the benchmark.
  • The entropy result being independent of $Q$ and $\Lambda$ suggests, if it holds up, that the regularization changes only the geometric sector of the microstate counting; this is a sharper statement than the paper's own conclusion that the entropy simply deviates from the area law.
  • The paper acknowledges that the covariance equations do not fix a unique effective Hamiltonian, so other reconstructions could share the same metric and thermodynamics but differ in the dynamical response to perturbations; observational tests beyond the static solution would then probe the choice of reconstruction, not just the geometry.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper applies the covariant effective-Hamiltonian framework of Ref. [53] to the Minkowski-core regular black hole. It reconstructs, by inverse engineering, a gravitational Hamiltonian constraint (14) whose unique static vacuum solution is the metric (12). It then adds a cosmological constant term (16) and a spherically reduced Maxwell term (19) to form the total constraint (20), solves the resulting equations of motion in Schwarzschild and Painlevé–Gullstrand gauges, and presents the charged (A)dS metric (21). The paper shows the Kretschmann scalar tends to zero at the center and to 8Λ²/3 at infinity, analyzes the horizon structure, and, for AdS, derives the mass, temperature, entropy, heat capacity, and free energy, reporting a first-order phase transition below a critical value of the regularization parameter α.

Significance. If the two load-bearing points identified below are resolved, this would be a useful concrete example of a regular black hole with electric charge and cosmological constant within a generally covariant effective Hamiltonian framework. The vacuum-sector derivation is transparent and self-contained: the reconstruction in Appendix A, the explicit constraint (14), the two-gauge solution with the coordinate transformation (24), and the complete Kretschmann expression in Appendix C are all presented in detail. The charged extension is a definite, falsifiable prediction of the framework rather than an input. However, the covariance of the matter-coupled constraint is asserted but not verified, and the entropy normalization prevents the claimed α→0 recovery of the area law for Q>0. These issues affect the central claims of the abstract and conclusions, so the manuscript requires substantive revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [II B, Eq. (20)] The total Hamiltonian constraint H_T^eff is obtained by simply adding the classical Λ and Maxwell terms (16) and (19) to the reconstructed H_G^eff. The covariance proof in Sec. II A applies to the vacuum constraint H_G^eff only; no computation is presented showing that {H_T^eff[N1], H_T^eff[N2]} closes in the form (7) with the same structure function μ and the effective metric (8). Since H_Λ and H_EM depend only on E1 and E2, their cross-brackets with H_G^eff are nontrivial and must be checked explicitly. Without this check, the statement that (21) and (23) are two gauges of one generally covariant theory, and hence that (21) is the gauge-independent charged extension, is an assumption rather than a derived result. Please compute the total bracket and either show it equals H_x[μE1/E2^2(N1N2'-N2N1')] or state the restrictions on M_eff and μ under which matter coupling preserves the deformed algebra.
  2. [III, Eqs. (28)–(37)] The statement that the entropy is independent of Λ and Q, and the claim that α→0 restores the area law, are not supported by the adopted definition. From Eqs. (29) and (34) one obtains dM/dx = 2πx e^{αx^{-n}} T, so Eq. (36) gives S(x_h)=∫_{x0}^{x_h} 2πx e^{αx^{-n}} dx. The lower limit x0 is defined by T(x0)=0 and therefore depends on Q and Λ, so S0 in Eq. (36), and hence S itself, depend on these parameters. In the limit α→0 this yields S=π(x_h^2-x0^2) with x0>0 for Q>0 (for example, Λ=-1, Q=0.1 gives x0≈0.1), not S=πx_h^2. The O(α^0) term in Eq. (37) is explicitly A/4-πx0^2, which contradicts the conclusions' claim that the area-law entropy is restored. To recover the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy one must fix the integration constant differently, e.g., by taking the lower limit x=0 rather than the zero of T.
  3. [III, Eq. (37)] The small-α expansion is performed with x0 treated as a fixed constant, but x0 is determined by T(x0)=0 and hence shifts with α. The endpoint contribution -2πx0 e^{αx0^{-n}} dx0/dα is therefore missing from the first-order expansion. If the lower limit is intended to be an α-independent integration constant, this should be stated explicitly and distinguished from the T=0 definition used in Eq. (36).
minor comments (5)
  1. [II B] There is a typo in the first sentence: 'Frist' should be 'First'.
  2. [III, Eq. (35)] The notation ∂²T/∂²x_h should be ∂²T/∂x_h².
  3. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption appears to assign the same parameter n=2 to both panels, but the critical values α_p≈0.0124974 and α_p≈0.0346868 correspond, as in Figs. 4 and 5, to n=3 and n=2, respectively; the caption should be corrected.
  4. [III, after Eq. (36)] The sentence 'only the positive-temperature branch is thermodynamically relevant' is presented without justification. Since the entropy is defined by integrating from T=0, the choice of lower limit is not the standard area-law normalization, and this choice affects the free energy (40); a brief justification or a discussion of the alternative normalization would improve the paper.
  5. [III, Eq. (37)] The expansion contains a denominator n−2; for 1≤n<2 the leading correction changes sign, and the paper does not comment on this range. A sentence noting the behavior for n<2 would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the vacuum Hamiltonian is explicitly reverse-engineered, the charged (A)dS metric follows from solving the coupled equations of motion, and the cited reconstruction method is independent published work.

full rationale

The paper plainly labels the vacuum-sector derivation an inverse construction (Sec. II B, App. A: 'Given a static, spherically symmetric metric, the method reconstructs an effective Hamiltonian constraint ... such that the prescribed metric is the unique static vacuum solution'), so that the Minkowski-core metric solves H_G^eff by design, not as a hidden prediction. The new claims—charged (A)dS metric (21), PG form (23), gauge equivalence (24), Kretschmann limits (26), and the thermodynamics of Sec. III—are obtained by adding independent Maxwell and cosmological-constant terms (16)–(19) to H_G^eff and solving the resulting equations of motion in Appendix B, with integration constants fixed by the classical limit (c1=-2M, c2=1/√3; C1=-2m, C2=1). No parameter is fitted to reproduce the target metric after the reconstruction. The dependence on Ref. [53] is a citation to a peer-reviewed, general reconstruction procedure by one of the present authors; it does not smuggle in the target result, and the paper acknowledges the residual freedom of R and the integration constants. The main weakness—that covariance of the total constraint after adding matter is asserted rather than demonstrated (no explicit check that {H_T,H_T} closes with the same structure function μ)—is an unverified assumption and a correctness risk, not a circular step. Hence no circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model introduces no new particles or fields. Its free parameters are inherited from the seed Minkowski-core metric, namely alpha, n, and z, plus the integration constant x0 in the entropy. The main unstated assumption is the covariance of the matter-extended total Hamiltonian, and the main acknowledged limitation is the restriction to z=0.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha
    Regularization parameter in the seed Minkowski-core metric (Eq. 12); controls the exponential factor e^{-alpha x^{-n}} and is not fixed by any principle. The thermodynamic critical value alpha_p is a derived number, not a fitted parameter.
  • n
    Positive exponent in the Minkowski-core metric (Eq. 12), n>=1; chosen freely, with plots for n=2 and n=3.
  • z = 0
    The Minkowski-core family has a second parameter z>=0; the paper explicitly restricts to z=0 because Eq. (A6) cannot be solved in closed form for z!=0. This limits the generality of all claims.
  • x0 = determined by T(x0)=0
    Lower integration limit for the entropy (Eq. 36), fixed by the zero of the Hawking temperature. It is an auxiliary constant, not fitted to external data, but it controls the additive entropy offset and the alpha-to-0 limit.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Covariance equations (10)-(11) and the general form (9) of H_G_eff from Refs. [48,49] are valid.
    Invoked in Sec. II A to characterize all covariant effective Hamiltonian constraints; the present work inherits this classification without reproof.
  • domain assumption The inverse reconstruction of Ref. [53] with integration constants R=0 and Xi=0 yields the unique static vacuum solution matching the target metric.
    Used in Sec. II B and Appendix A to convert the Minkowski-core metric into M_eff and H_G_eff; uniqueness and covariance are asserted by the cited method.
  • ad hoc to paper Adding classical matter Hamiltonians, the Lambda term (16) and Maxwell term (19), to H_G_eff preserves the first-class constraint algebra with the same structure function mu.
    The total constraint (20) is simply summed; no closure check of Eq. (7) for the extended theory is presented. If this fails, gauge independence and covariance of the charged solution are not guaranteed.
  • standard math The spherically symmetric reduced phase space (K_I, E_I) with Poisson brackets (1) is an adequate description.
    Standard canonical framework for spherically symmetric gravity; used throughout Sec. II.
  • domain assumption The seed Minkowski-core metric (12) with z=0 is a physically acceptable starting point.
    Taken from Ref. [54]; the paper assumes regularity conditions n>=1, n>z, alpha>0 and does not justify them beyond the source.
  • domain assumption The thermodynamic first law dM = T dS + V dP + Phi_Q dQ + Phi_alpha dalpha is assumed to hold for the effective solution.
    Used in Sec. III to define entropy and conjugate potentials; no derivation from an action or Smarr relation is given.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Minkowski-core black hole with cosmological constant and electric charge." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EF4PTR67

@misc{pith2026260812800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Minkowski-core black hole with cosmological constant and electric charge},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EF4PTR67}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.12800}
}
read the original abstract

Within a covariant effective Hamiltonian framework, we employ an inverse construction to derive the gravitational Hamiltonian constraint for a Minkowski-core regular black hole without invoking exotic matter. We then extend the constraint by coupling it to a spherically reduced Maxwell field and including a cosmological constant. The resulting charged anti-de Sitter (AdS) and de Sitter (dS) solution is gauge independent and reduces to the Reissner--Nordstr\"om--AdS (RN-AdS) black hole when the regularization parameter vanishes. Electric charge and a cosmological constant preserve the Minkowski core: the metric approaches the Minkowski geometry at the center, the Kretschmann scalar vanishes there, and the spacetime exhibits a multi-horizon structure. Focusing on AdS backgrounds, we investigate the black hole thermodynamics. For a regularization parameter below a critical value, the model exhibits a phase transition with consistent signatures across these thermodynamic quantities, demonstrating that Minkowski-core regularization can preserve center regularity while modifying the AdS thermodynamic phase structure relative to the RN-AdS benchmark.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.12800 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Plots of the metric function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. shows the case of a positive cosmological constant. The left panel corresponds to a fixed parameter α, and the right panel to a fixed charge parameter Q. One can observe that for small x, the behavior of the metric function is similar to that in the case of a negative cosmological constant, while for large x, a new root appears in the metric function, which is generally identified as the cosmological horizon. C. Cur… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. illustrates these asymptotic features for n = 3 and displays the intermediate-x behavior of K. In the left panel both Q and Λ are nonzero, in the middle panel Q = 0, and in the right panel Λ = 0. In all cases, the curves confirm that K vanishes at the origin and approaches the constant in (26) at large x, while developing multiple peaks at intermediate radii. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Plots of the Hawking temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Plots of the heat capacity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Plots of the free energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [53]

    Covariant Dynamics from Static Spherically Symmetric Geometries,

    C. Zhang and Z. Cao, “Covariant Dynamics from Static Spherically Symmetric Geometries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135no. 26, (2025) 261401,arXiv:2506.09540 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [1]

    Structures of classical GR 5

    work page

  3. [2]

    Hamiltonian constraint and matter coupling for the Minkowski-core black hole 8 C

    Extensions to effective model 6 B. Hamiltonian constraint and matter coupling for the Minkowski-core black hole 8 C. Curvature invariants and regularity of the extended model 12 III. Black hole thermodynamics14 IV. Conclusions18 Acknowledgments19 A. Method of Construct the Hamiltonian constraint19 B. Equations of motion21 C. Kretschmann scalar and reality...

    work page

  4. [3]

    In this case, the spacetime is based on a 4-dimensional manifoldM×Σ with Σ ∼= M1×S 2

    Structures of classical GR Let us start with the spherically symmetric sector of GR. In this case, the spacetime is based on a 4-dimensional manifoldM×Σ with Σ ∼= M1×S 2. HereM 1 denotes the 1-dimensional manifold corresponding to the radial direction, andS 2 is the 2-sphere. Let (x,θ,ϕ)∈M 1×S 2 be the adapted coordinates. In classical GR, the phase space...

    work page

  5. [4]

    This model can be regarded as a modified theory of gravity formulated in the Hamiltonian framework

    Extensions to effective model We now turn to the effective model introduced in [48, 49]. This model can be regarded as a modified theory of gravity formulated in the Hamiltonian framework. It is effective in the sense that the Hamiltonian constraint is modified from its classical expression, referred to as HG eff, while the phase-space structure, as well ...

    work page

  6. [5]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    SubstitutingE 1 =x 2,E 2 from (B2),N x = 0, andNfrom (B4) into the general metric (8) then yields the Schwarzschild- gauge line element (21) of Sec. II B. We next solve the same constraints in the PG gaugeE1(x) =x 2 andE 2(x) =x. Imposing HT x = 0 andH T eff = 0 gives K2(x) = e αx−n 2 q −Q2 + Λx4 3 +C 1x x ,(B5) K1(x) = x−n−2e αx−n 2 [αn(3Q 2−Λx 4−3C 1x) ...

    arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology,

    S. W. Hawking and R. Penrose, “The Singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A314(1970) 529–548

    1970

  8. [8]

    The large scale structure of space-time,

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, “The large scale structure of space-time,” 2023. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:121949888

    work page 2023

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Singularity Theorems and Their Consequences,

    J. M. M. Senovilla, “Singularity Theorems and Their Consequences,” Gen. Rel. Grav.30 (1998) 701,arXiv:1801.04912 [gr-qc]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Nonsingular general relativistic gravitational collapse,

    J. Bardeen, “Nonsingular general relativistic gravitational collapse,”

  3. [11]

    Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,

    S. A. Hayward, “Formation and evaporation of regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 031103,arXiv:gr-qc/0506126

    2006 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Notes on nonsingular models of black holes,

    V. P. Frolov, “Notes on nonsingular models of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D94no. 10, (2016) 24 104056,arXiv:1609.01758 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity,

    Z.-Y. Fan and X. Wang, “Construction of Regular Black Holes in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. D94no. 12, (2016) 124027,arXiv:1610.02636 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,

    C. Lan, H. Yang, Y. Guo, and Y.-G. Miao, “Regular Black Holes: A Short Topic Review,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.62no. 9, (2023) 202,arXiv:2303.11696 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Echoes from the Minkowski-core spacetime,

    D. Zhang, Q. Tan, G. Fu, H. Gong, J.-P. Wu, and Q. Pan, “Echoes from the Minkowski-core spacetime,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.69no. 5, (2026) 250412,arXiv:2509.23215 [gr-qc]

    2026

  8. [16]

    Quasinormal modes and ringdown waveforms of a Frolov black hole,

    Z. Song, H. Gong, H.-L. Li, G. Fu, L.-G. Zhu, and J.-P. Wu, “Quasinormal modes and ringdown waveforms of a Frolov black hole,” Commun. Theor. Phys.76no. 10, (2024) 105401,arXiv:2406.04787 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Quasinormal modes of a d-dimensional regular black hole featuring an integrable singularity,

    Z. Dong, D. Zhang, G. Fu, and J.-P. Wu, “Quasinormal modes of a d-dimensional regular black hole featuring an integrable singularity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 2, (2025) 215, arXiv:2412.20457 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Quasinormal modes of a regular black hole with sub-Planckian curvature,

    D. Zhang, H. Gong, G. Fu, J.-P. Wu, and Q. Pan, “Quasinormal modes of a regular black hole with sub-Planckian curvature,” Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 6, (2024) 564, arXiv:2402.15085 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Thermodynamics of the Bardeen Black Hole in Anti-de Sitter Space,

    C. Li, C. Fang, M. He, J. Ding, and J. Deng, “Thermodynamics of the Bardeen Black Hole in Anti-de Sitter Space,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A34no. 40, (2019) 1950336,arXiv:1812.02567 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    A new black hole coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics surrounded by quintessence: Thermodynamics, geodesics, and Regge–Wheeler potential,

    A. Al-Badawi and F. Ahmed, “A new black hole coupled with nonlinear electrodynamics surrounded by quintessence: Thermodynamics, geodesics, and Regge–Wheeler potential,” Chin. J. Phys.94(2025) 185–203,arXiv:2503.00765 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Thermodynamics and phase transition of Bardeen–AdS-class black holes,

    S.-P. Wu and S.-W. Wei, “Thermodynamics and phase transition of Bardeen–AdS-class black holes,” Class. Quant. Grav.42no. 7, (2025) 075015,arXiv:2407.19702 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Shadow of rotating regular black holes,

    A. Abdujabbarov, M. Amir, B. Ahmedov, and S. G. Ghosh, “Shadow of rotating regular black holes,” Phys. Rev. D93no. 10, (2016) 104004,arXiv:1604.03809 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Observational appearances of an inner extremal regular black hole illuminated by various accretion flows,

    D. Zhang, G. Fu, X.-J. Wang, Q. Pan, X.-M. Kuang, and J.-P. Wu, “Observational appearances of an inner extremal regular black hole illuminated by various accretion flows,” Eur. Phys. J. C85no. 9, (2025) 1051,arXiv:2412.20450 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Probing Quantum Gravity effects with 25 Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals around Rotating Hayward Black Holes,

    D. Zhang, C. Zhang, Q. Pan, G. Fu, and J.-P. Wu, “Probing Quantum Gravity effects with 25 Extreme Mass Ratio Inspirals around Rotating Hayward Black Holes,”arXiv:2602.07436 [gr-qc]

  17. [25]

    Gravitational waveforms from periodic orbits around a novel regular black hole,

    H. Gong, S. Long, X.-J. Wang, Z. Xia, J.-P. Wu, and Q. Pan, “Gravitational waveforms from periodic orbits around a novel regular black hole,”arXiv:2509.23318 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,

    E. Ayon-Beato and A. Garcia, “The Bardeen model as a nonlinear magnetic monopole,” Phys. Lett. B493(2000) 149–152,arXiv:gr-qc/0009077

    2000 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes,

    K. A. Bronnikov, “Nonlinear electrodynamics, regular black holes and wormholes,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27no. 06, (2018) 1841005,arXiv:1711.00087 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Regular multihorizon black holes in modified gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics,

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, “Regular multihorizon black holes in modified gravity with nonlinear electrodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D96no. 10, (2017) 104008,arXiv:1708.05226 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Regular black holes and their singular families,

    H. Huang and X.-P. Rao, “Regular black holes and their singular families,” Phys. Rev. D 111no. 10, (2025) 104040,arXiv:2503.13133 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Can we distinguish whether black holes have singularities or not through echoes and light rings?,

    X.-P. Rao and H. Huang, “Can we distinguish whether black holes have singularities or not through echoes and light rings?,”arXiv:2505.11073 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity,

    T. Thiemann, “Introduction to Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity,” arXiv:gr-qc/0110034

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Loop quantum gravity,

    C. Rovelli, “Loop quantum gravity,” Living Rev. Rel.1(1998) 1,arXiv:gr-qc/9710008

    1998 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Background independent quantum gravity: A Status report,

    A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, “Background independent quantum gravity: A Status report,” Class. Quant. Grav.21(2004) R53,arXiv:gr-qc/0404018

    2004 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Fundamental structure of loop quantum gravity,

    M. Han, W. Huang, and Y. Ma, “Fundamental structure of loop quantum gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D16(2007) 1397–1474,arXiv:gr-qc/0509064

    2007 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report,

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, “Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report,” Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 213001,arXiv:1108.0893 [gr-qc]

    2011 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Absence of singularity in loop quantum cosmology,

    M. Bojowald, “Absence of singularity in loop quantum cosmology,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86 (2001) 5227–5230,arXiv:gr-qc/0102069

    2001 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Quantum Transfiguration of Kruskal Black Holes,

    A. Ashtekar, J. Olmedo, and P. Singh, “Quantum Transfiguration of Kruskal Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 24, (2018) 241301,arXiv:1806.00648 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    An effective model for the quantum Schwarzschild black hole,

    A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera, “An effective model for the quantum Schwarzschild black hole,” Phys. Lett. B829(2022) 137075,arXiv:2112.12110 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Loop Quantum Black Hole,

    X. Zhang, “Loop Quantum Black Hole,” Universe9no. 7, (2023) 313,arXiv:2308.10184 26 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Black Holes in Loop Quantum Gravity,

    A. Perez, “Black Holes in Loop Quantum Gravity,” Rept. Prog. Phys.80no. 12, (2017) 126901,arXiv:1703.09149 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss Cheese Models,

    J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, J. Yang, and C. Zhang, “Quantum Oppenheimer-Snyder and Swiss Cheese Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 10, (2023) 101501,arXiv:2210.02253 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Semiclassical loop quantum black hole,

    L. Modesto, “Semiclassical loop quantum black hole,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.49(2010) 1649–1683,arXiv:0811.2196 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Reduced phase space quantization of black holes: Path integrals and effective dynamics,

    C. Zhang, “Reduced phase space quantization of black holes: Path integrals and effective dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D104no. 12, (2021) 126003,arXiv:2106.08202 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Fate of quantum black holes,

    V. Husain, J. G. Kelly, R. Santacruz, and E. Wilson-Ewing, “Fate of quantum black holes,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 2, (2022) 024014,arXiv:2203.04238 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Phenomenological dynamics of loop quantum cosmology in Kantowski-Sachs spacetime,

    D.-W. Chiou, “Phenomenological dynamics of loop quantum cosmology in Kantowski-Sachs spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 044019,arXiv:0803.3659 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Covariance in models of loop quantum gravity: Spherical symmetry,

    M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, and J. D. Reyes, “Covariance in models of loop quantum gravity: Spherical symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D92no. 4, (2015) 045043,arXiv:1507.00329 [gr-qc]

    2015 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Nonsingular spherically symmetric black-hole model with holonomy corrections,

    A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera, “Nonsingular spherically symmetric black-hole model with holonomy corrections,” Phys. Rev. D106no. 2, (2022) 024035, arXiv:2205.02098 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity,

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, and J. Yang, “Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D111no. 8, (2025) L081504,arXiv:2407.10168 [gr-qc]

    2025

  41. [49]

    Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity: A solution without Cauchy horizons,

    C. Zhang, J. Lewandowski, Y. Ma, and J. Yang, “Black holes and covariance in effective quantum gravity: A solution without Cauchy horizons,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 4, (2025) 044054,arXiv:2412.02487 [gr-qc]

    2025

  42. [50]

    Black holes in effective loop quantum gravity: Covariant holonomy modifications,

    I. H. Belfaqih, M. Bojowald, S. Brahma, and E. I. Duque, “Black holes in effective loop quantum gravity: Covariant holonomy modifications,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 4, (2025) 046022,arXiv:2407.12087 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Singularity resolution by holonomy corrections: Spherical charged black holes in cosmological backgrounds,

    A. Alonso-Bardaji, D. Brizuela, and R. Vera, “Singularity resolution by holonomy corrections: Spherical charged black holes in cosmological backgrounds,” Phys. Rev. D107 no. 6, (2023) 064067,arXiv:2302.10619 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Quantum geometry and effective dynamics of Janis-Newman-Winicour singularities,

    C. Zhang and X. Zhang, “Quantum geometry and effective dynamics of Janis-Newman-Winicour singularities,” Phys. Rev. D101no. 8, (2020) 086002, 27 arXiv:1912.07278 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Regular black holes with sub-Planckian curvature,

    Y. Ling and M.-H. Wu, “Regular black holes with sub-Planckian curvature,” Class. Quant. Grav.40no. 7, (2023) 075009,arXiv:2109.05974 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Accretion disk for regular black holes with sub-Planckian curvature,

    W. Zeng, Y. Ling, Q.-Q. Jiang, and G.-P. Li, “Accretion disk for regular black holes with sub-Planckian curvature,” Phys. Rev. D108no. 10, (2023) 104072,arXiv:2308.00976 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [56]

    Singularities and the Finale of Black Hole Evaporation,

    L. Xiang, Y. Ling, and Y. G. Shen, “Singularities and the Finale of Black Hole Evaporation,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22(2013) 1342016,arXiv:1305.3851 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Quantum symmetry reduction for diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections,

    M. Bojowald and H. A. Kastrup, “Quantum symmetry reduction for diffeomorphism invariant theories of connections,” Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 3009–3043, arXiv:hep-th/9907042

    2000 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Spherically symmetric quantum geometry: Hamiltonian constraint,

    M. Bojowald and R. Swiderski, “Spherically symmetric quantum geometry: Hamiltonian constraint,” Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2129–2154,arXiv:gr-qc/0511108

    2006 arXiv

  50. [59]

    Loop quantization of spherically symmetric midi-superspaces,

    M. Campiglia, R. Gambini, and J. Pullin, “Loop quantization of spherically symmetric midi-superspaces,” Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 3649–3672,arXiv:gr-qc/0703135

    2007 arXiv

  51. [60]

    Spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell theory and loop quantum gravity corrections,

    R. Tibrewala, “Spherically symmetric Einstein-Maxwell theory and loop quantum gravity corrections,” Class. Quant. Grav.29(2012) 235012,arXiv:1207.2585 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Covariant effective spacetimes of spherically symmetric electrovacuum with a cosmological constant,

    J. Yang, C. Zhang, and Y. Ma, “Covariant effective spacetimes of spherically symmetric electrovacuum with a cosmological constant,” Phys. Rev. D112no. 6, (2025) 064049, arXiv:2503.15157 [gr-qc]

    2025

  53. [62]

    The Four laws of black hole mechanics,

    J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. W. Hawking, “The Four laws of black hole mechanics,” Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973) 161–170

    1973

  54. [63]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333–2346

    1973

  55. [64]

    Entropy and black-hole thermodynamics,

    R. M. Wald, “Entropy and black-hole thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 1271–1282

    1979

  56. [65]

    First law and Smarr formula of black hole mechanics in nonlinear gauge theories,

    Y. Zhang and S. Gao, “First law and Smarr formula of black hole mechanics in nonlinear gauge theories,” Class. Quant. Grav.35no. 14, (2018) 145007,arXiv:1610.01237 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  57. [66]

    Charged Simpson-Visser AdS Black Holes: Geodesic Structure and Thermodynamic Properties,

    F. Ahmed, A. Al-Badawi, and M. Fathi, “Charged Simpson-Visser AdS Black Holes: Geodesic Structure and Thermodynamic Properties,”arXiv:2601.10469 [gr-qc]

  58. [67]

    Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,

    R. K. Kaul and P. Majumdar, “Logarithmic correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” 28 Phys. Rev. Lett.84(2000) 5255–5257,arXiv:gr-qc/0002040

    2000 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula,

    S. Carlip, “Logarithmic corrections to black hole entropy from the Cardy formula,” Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 4175–4186,arXiv:gr-qc/0005017

    2000 arXiv

  60. [69]

    Counting black hole microscopic states in loop quantum gravity,

    A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, “Counting black hole microscopic states in loop quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 064026,arXiv:hep-th/0605125. 29

    2006 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.