Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 84 references

Blinking membrane patterns induced by protein binding/unbinding

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cyclic binding and unbinding of curvature-inducing proteins in two states makes membrane domains blink—growing, shrinking, and reforming in place—even at zero surface tension.

desk verdict Blinking domains are a genuinely new nonequilibrium membrane pattern with direct evidence, but the unswept flip-attempt interval makes the headline claim conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13016 v1 pith:DGA4O3HA submitted 2026-08-13 cond-mat.soft nlin.PSphysics.bio-ph

Hiroshi Noguchi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softnlin.PSphysics.bio-ph
keywords blinkingdomainsactivePottsmodelcurvature-inducingproteinsnonequilibriummembranepatternsmeshlesssimulationspontaneouscurvaturestandingwaves
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a membrane driven out of equilibrium by the cyclic binding and unbinding of curvature-inducing proteins can support "blinking domains": patches that grow, shrink, and regrow at the same location without moving away. The proteins have two bound states with different spontaneous curvatures ($C_0=0.05$ and $0.1$), and the chemical-potential imbalance drives a cycle $s=0\to2\to1\to0$. Convex domains of the higher-curvature state grow, then switch to the lower-curvature state and shrink, repeating indefinitely. The result matters because it shows a nonequilibrium standing-wave pattern on a deformable membrane that does not require surface tension, whereas equilibrium hexagonal domains are stable only under positive tension.

What carries the argument

The central object is a meshless membrane model in which each membrane particle is a binding site with three states: unbound ($s=0$) and two bound states ($s=1$ and $s=2$) with spontaneous curvatures $C_0=0.05$ and $0.1$, respectively. State changes are attempted as single-particle Metropolis flips with acceptance rate $p_{\rm acpt}=\min[1,\exp(\pm(\Delta U-μ_{\alpha\beta})/k_BT)]$, where $μ_{\alpha\beta}$ is the chemical potential between states; the drive is a fixed chemical-potential imbalance $μ_{02}-μ_{01}-μ_{12}>0$ that forces the cyclic direction $s=0\to2\to1\to0$. The load-bearing identity is the relation between bound-state curvature and membrane bending: higher-curvature $s=2$ domains are stabilized by bending energy under tension, whereas switching to lower-curvature $s=1$ makes them unstable, producing the growth-then-shrink blink cycle. Bending rigidity and the saddle-splay modulus both change on binding, coupling protein distribution to local membrane shape and keeping the domain location pinned.

What would settle it

Run the same two-state curvature cycle with state-flip rates that depend on local protein density or on instantaneous local curvature, for example a Gillespie-type binding kinetics with concentration-dependent rates, and check whether the blinking domain phase at $γ=0$ survives; if it disappears or becomes a traveling wave, the memoryless fixed-chemical-potential flip rule is essential to the reported pattern. In an experiment, fluorescently labeled curvature-inducing proteins with two switchable conformations on tensionless vesicles under an ATP-driven binding cycle should show stationary oscillating domains if the claim is right.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that cyclic protein binding and unbinding creates a new nonequilibrium pattern, blinking domains, in which the domain size oscillates in place, and this pattern survives in tensionless membranes where equilibrium convex domains are unstable. At $γ=1$, with $μ_{01}\simeq2$ and $μ_{02}\simeq8$, convex $s=2$ domains grow toward their stable size, then switch to $s=1$; the resulting $s=1$ domains are unstable against the unbound state and shrink, after which the cycle restarts. Membrane bending holds the domains at nearly fixed locations, so the pattern behaves like a standing wave rather than a traveling or diffusing pattern. In thermal equilibrium the same model gives hexagonally ordered convex domains only under positive surface tension, but the blinking mode appears even at $γ=0$, before domains can grow into buds or vesicles. The paper argues this makes blinking a robust pattern on deformable membranes and a minimal off-lattice analogue of standing-wave concentration dynamics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the nonequilibrium drive can be represented by fixed chemical potentials acting on memoryless, single-particle state flips, so that binding and unbinding kinetics are assumed to depend only on the instantaneous local energy difference and not on protein concentration, cooperativity, or shape changes during the flip itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Blinking domains form at zero surface tension, so nonequilibrium protein cycling can organize membrane curvature patterns where equilibrium phase separation would fail.
  • Because the blinking domains stay in place, the pattern is a standing-wave-type concentration oscillation, distinct from the traveling or diffusing domains seen in earlier lattice and off-lattice active Potts models.
  • The blink frequency and the fraction of the $s=1$ state increase with the chemical-potential imbalance, so the oscillation period is controlled by the drive strength.
  • The steady state dissipates energy at rate $(μ_{02}-μ_{01}-μ_{12})q_f$, tying the pattern directly to entropy production.
  • At too large or too small $μ_{02}$ in tensionless membranes the cycle instead buds off vesicles, so blinking occupies a finite window of drive parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the blinking mechanism extends to cooperative or concentration-dependent binding, it could provide a motor-free way for cells to create oscillating protein patches at fixed membrane sites, for instance during endocytic or signaling cluster turnover.
  • The role of the saddle-splay change on binding is implicit in the model but not isolated; a testable extension would compare blinking with particles that change only spontaneous curvature and not $\bar{\kappa}$, to see whether Gaussian-curvature sensing contributes to pinning.
  • The two-state cycle is the minimal conformational switch; adding a third state or competing cycles in the deformable membrane may turn the standing blink into traveling waves, analogous to the $q>3$ lattice results the paper cites.
  • A direct experimental test would use two switchable curvature-generating domains on a tensionless giant vesicle with an externally cycled chemical fuel; the paper predicts stationary oscillating domains rather than uniform budding.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports meshless membrane simulations of a three-state active Potts-like model in which membrane particles can be unbound (s=0) or bound in two curvature-inducing states (s=1 and s=2 with spontaneous curvatures C0=0.05 and 0.1, respectively). State changes are driven by imposed chemical potentials mu01, mu02, and mu12, so the protein cycle s=0 -> 2 -> 1 -> 0 operates out of equilibrium. At positive surface tension (gamma=1) the authors find, besides the equilibrium hexagonal domain (HD) phase, a blinking domain (BD) mode in which convex s=2 domains grow, convert to the lower-curvature s=1 state, and shrink before reforming at nearly the same location, as well as flat moving-domain (FD) and vesicle (VES) regimes. The central claim is that BD is a standing-wave-like pattern that can form even at zero surface tension, where equilibrium hexagonal domains are unstable. The paper includes phase diagrams in the (mu01, mu02) plane for gamma=1 and gamma=0, time traces of state densities, cluster-size measures, and representative snapshots and movies.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper identifies a new nonequilibrium membrane patterning mode: cyclic protein binding/unbinding with two curvature states produces stationary blinking domains, in contrast to equilibrium HD domains that require positive surface tension. This extends earlier lattice and off-lattice active Potts studies by coupling the state dynamics to membrane deformation and thermal fluctuations, and it offers a concrete mechanism for standing-wave-like membrane patterns. The evidence is based on direct simulation output: snapshots, density time traces, cluster measures, and multiple independent runs. The main weakness is that the dynamical phase boundaries and the robustness of BD at gamma=0 rest on an unexplored simulation protocol parameter (the MC flip interval tau_MC) and on hand-tuned classification thresholds, so the quantitative phase diagram is not yet established with the same confidence as the existence of BD at representative parameter points.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II, Eq. (6), and Sec. III B-C] The state-flip attempt interval tau_MC = 0.01 tau is introduced in Sec. II and used in all simulations, but it is never varied. The BD mechanism described in Sec. III B relies on a race between s=2 domain growth (governed by membrane relaxation, diffusion, and line tension) and the s=2 -> s=1 flip rate. With a larger tau_MC, s=2 domains would have more time to grow and could bud into vesicles instead of blinking; with a smaller tau_MC, the system might stay homogeneous or enter the FD regime. Since tau_MC is an arbitrary protocol parameter rather than a derived physical binding/unbinding rate, the headline claim that blinking domains can form even at gamma=0 is conditional on this single choice. A sweep of tau_MC, or an explicit mapping from tau_MC to a physical rate for the chemical cycle, is needed to establish that BD is not an artifact of this choice.
  2. [Sec. III B, Figs. 3 and 8] The dynamic phase boundaries are assigned using hand-tuned thresholds: BD is defined by f3co > 0.2, where three-state coexistence requires phi_k > phi_th for all states, with phi_th = 0.005 for most conditions and phi_th = 0.01-0.03 in other cases, and no statistical error bars are shown for the phase boundaries. Because these thresholds are chosen ad hoc, the location and, in narrow regions, even the existence of the BD phase could depend on the classification rule. The snapshots and time traces convincingly demonstrate BD at representative points, but the quantitative phase diagrams and the claim that BD is a 'robust' dynamic mode would be considerably strengthened by a sensitivity analysis with respect to the thresholds and by reporting classification results across a range of thresholds.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III B, after Fig. 7] The criterion for three-state coexistence uses the condition phi_k > phi_th, but phi_k is not explicitly defined in the text; it should be stated that these are the instantaneous densities of the three states used in the time-fraction calculation f3co.
  2. [Sec. II, statistical errors] The manuscript states that statistical errors are calculated from three or more independent runs, but it does not report the number of runs used for each phase diagram point or show error bars on the phase boundaries; a brief statement of run counts and measurement uncertainties would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Fig. 2(e)] The y-axis label of Fig. 2(e) appears to read 'HDE0', which is likely a typographical error; it should read 'E0' or be otherwise clarified.
  4. [Sec. III B, entropy production] The expression for the entropy production rate, (mu02 - mu01 - mu12) q_f, is stated without derivation or reference; a short derivation or a citation to the relevant result would help the reader connect this quantity to the fluctuation theorem.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: blinking is an emergent simulation output, not a fitted or imported quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that cyclic protein binding/unbinding, implemented as an off-lattice active Potts model with fixed chemical potentials and spontaneous curvatures, produces blinking domains (BD). This is an emergent output of the molecular-dynamics/Monte-Carlo simulation, not a quantity fitted from the model or renamed from an input. The model is defined in Eqs. (1)-(6); the BD phase is identified from simulation trajectories and classified by thresholds such as f3co > 0.2, which are diagnostics rather than fitted parameters. No equation in the paper reduces a claimed prediction to an input by construction. The self-citations (refs. 42, 51-56) supply the base meshless membrane model, the active Potts framework, and prior lattice/off-lattice results; these are used for context and novelty comparison, but the BD observation itself is generated in the present simulations and does not depend on accepting an unverified uniqueness theorem or an ansatz imported solely through citation. The concern that the MC flip-attempt interval tau_MC=0.01tau is not swept is a parameter-sensitivity or physical-realism question, not a circularity: failing to vary a protocol parameter does not make the simulation output equal to its input. Thus no circular step can be exhibited, and the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is a direct simulation output, so no data-fitting constants are involved. The ledger lists the hand-chosen model inputs that the blinking phenomenon depends on, plus the modeling axioms about how proteins switch states. No new physical entity is introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Spontaneous curvatures of bound states C0(s=1) and C0(s=2) = 0.05σ^-1 and 0.1σ^-1
    Chosen by hand; central to the formation and shrinkage of convex domains.
  • Protein-protein repulsion strength ε_pp = 2 kBT
    Sets the line tension driving phase separation; taken from the previous study 51.
  • Bending rigidities of unbound and bound states κ_u and κ_b = 16.1 kBT and 144 kBT (k_bend=k_tilt=10 and 80)
    Defines the curvature energy scale; taken from previous membrane simulation studies.
  • Surface tension γ = 1, 0.5, and 0 kBT/σ^2
    Control parameter scanned; the zero-tension case is the headline claim of robustness.
  • Chemical potentials µ01, µ02, and µ12 = µ12=0; BD observed near µ01≈2 and µ02≈8
    These are scanned phase-space coordinates, not fitted to data; the blinking window is an emergent result.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The meshless membrane particle model with implicit solvent reproduces fluid membrane mechanics, including bending, tilt, and line tension, in the simulated parameter regime.
    Sec. II: membrane particles self-assemble into a fluid sheet; this model is taken from earlier author papers (refs 57-61).
  • domain assumption Protein binding and unbinding is a Markovian three-state process with fixed chemical potentials, and state flips are attempted once per particle every τ_MC=0.01τ.
    Sec. II: Metropolis MC acceptance p_acpt = min[1, exp(±ΔH/kBT)]; no memory or explicit concentration fields are included.
  • domain assumption The spontaneous curvature of a bound protein is constant while bound and switches instantly upon state change, without changing the particle position or orientation during the flip.
    Sec. II: states s=1 and s=2 have C0=0.05 and 0.1; the flip changes the energy term via Eq. (3) but does not relax u_i during the flip.
  • standard math Standard statistical mechanics and Monte Carlo or Langevin update rules are valid for the steady-state sampling used.
    Metropolis acceptance and leapfrog Langevin integration are standard; no proof is needed beyond the cited references.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Blinking membrane patterns induced by protein binding/unbinding." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DGA4O3HA

@misc{pith2026260813016,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Blinking membrane patterns induced by protein binding/unbinding},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DGA4O3HA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13016}
}
read the original abstract

Nonequilibrium membrane pattern formation is studied using meshless membrane simulation. Bound proteins are considered to have two states that generate different membrane spontaneous curvatures. Protein binding and unbinding occur cyclically owing to chemical potential differences, as an off-lattice active Potts model. It is found that this cyclic binding/unbinding can induce blinking domains, with oscillating size: convex domains of the proteins with a higher spontaneous curvature grow, and subsequently, the proteins change to the other state with a lower spontaneous curvature, resulting in domain shrinkage. These processes repeat. In thermal equilibrium, hexagonal convex domains are formed by the competition between bending and surface tension energies, so that they are stably formed only under positive surface tension. However, blinking domains can form even in tensionless membranes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.13016 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic of the binding and unbinding of curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Binding of proteins of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dynamic phase diagram at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. FD pattern at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. BD pattern at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (e)–(h)). Therefore, we consider that the essential dynamics are captured by the phase diagram at µ12 = 0. C. Nonequilibrium Patterns at γ = 0 and 0.5 The tensionless membranes (γ = 0) exhibit no sta￾ble HD domains, in either equilibrium or nonequilibrium. However, the…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. BD pattern at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_9.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Dynamic phase diagram at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Merino-Salom\'ona , author L

    author author A. Merino-Salom\'ona , author L. Babla , \ and\ author P. Schwille ,\ 10.1016/j.ceb.2021.07.001 journal journal Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. \ volume 72 ,\ pages 106 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2021.07.001 2021

  2. [2]

    Wu \ and\ author J

    author author M. Wu \ and\ author J. Liu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2020.08.017 journal journal Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. \ volume 68 ,\ pages 45 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.08.017 2020

  3. [3]

    Beta \ and\ author K

    author author C. Beta \ and\ author K. Kruse ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025210 journal journal Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 8 ,\ pages 239 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025210 2017

  4. [4]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1002/syst.202400042 journal journal ChemSystemsChem \ volume 7 ,\ pages e202400042 ( year 2025 a ) NoStop

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1002/syst.202400042 journal journal ChemSystemsChem \ volume 7 ,\ pages e202400042 ( year 2025 a ) NoStop

    doi:10.1002/syst.202400042 2025

  5. [5]

    author author M. L. \ Verge-Serandour \ and\ author K. Alim ,\ 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040821-115312 journal journal Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 263 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-040821-115312 2024

  6. [6]

    Litschel , author B

    author author T. Litschel , author B. Ramm , author R. Maas , author M. Heymann , \ and\ author P. Schwille ,\ https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201808750 journal journal Angew. Chem. \ volume 57 ,\ pages 16286 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/anie.201808750 2018

  7. [7]

    Wu , author M

    author author Z. Wu , author M. Su , author C. Tong , author M. Wu , \ and\ author J. Liu ,\ 10.1038/s41467-017-02469-1 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 136 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02469-1 2018

  8. [8]

    author author H. T. \ McMahon \ and\ author J. L. \ Gallop ,\ 10.1038/nature04396 journal journal Nature \ volume 438 ,\ pages 590 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nature04396 2005

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    Zimmerberg \ and\ author M

    author author J. Zimmerberg \ and\ author M. M. \ Kozlov ,\ @noop journal journal Nat.\ Rev.\ Mol.\ Cell\ Biol. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 9 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  2. [10]

    Baumgart , author B

    author author T. Baumgart , author B. R. \ Capraro , author C. Zhu , \ and\ author S. L. \ Das ,\ 10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103450 journal journal Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. \ volume 62 ,\ pages 483 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  3. [11]

    Suetsugu , author S

    author author S. Suetsugu , author S. Kurisu , \ and\ author T. Takenawa ,\ 10.1152/physrev.00040.2013 journal journal Physiol. Rev. \ volume 94 ,\ pages 1219 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2013

  4. [12]

    Kaksonen \ and\ author A

    author author M. Kaksonen \ and\ author A. Roux ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. \ volume 19 ,\ pages 313 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  5. [13]

    B \'e thune \ and\ author F

    author author J. B \'e thune \ and\ author F. T. \ Wieland ,\ @noop journal journal Annu. Rev. Biophys. \ volume 47 ,\ pages 63 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  6. [14]

    Svitkina ,\ @noop journal journal Cold Spring Harb

    author author T. Svitkina ,\ @noop journal journal Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. \ volume 10 ,\ pages a018267 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  7. [15]

    Lutkenhaus ,\ @noop journal journal Trends Microbiol

    author author J. Lutkenhaus ,\ @noop journal journal Trends Microbiol. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 411 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  8. [16]

    Sackmann \ and\ author M

    author author E. Sackmann \ and\ author M. Tanaka ,\ 10.1007/s12551-021-00781-1 journal journal Biophys. Rev. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 123 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  9. [17]

    Li , author H

    author author D. Li , author H. Tu , \ and\ author H. Cai ,\ 10.1101/cshperspect.a041748 journal journal Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. \ volume 17 ,\ pages a041748 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  10. [18]

    Johannes , author R

    author author L. Johannes , author R. G. \ Parton , author P. Bassereau , \ and\ author S. Mayor ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 311 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  11. [19]

    Brandizzi \ and\ author C

    author author F. Brandizzi \ and\ author C. Barlowe ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 382 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  12. [20]

    author author J. H. \ Hurley , author E. Boura , author L.-A. \ Carlson , \ and\ author B. R \'o \. z ycki ,\ @noop journal journal Cell \ volume 143 ,\ pages 875 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010

  13. [21]

    author author H. T. \ McMahon \ and\ author E. Boucrot ,\ 10.1038/nrm3151 journal journal Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 517 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  14. [22]

    author author P. A. \ Iglesias \ and\ author P. Banerjee ,\ 10.1101/cshperspect.a041746 journal journal Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. \ volume 18 ,\ pages a041746 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    2026 doi

  15. [23]

    Arai , author T

    author author Y. Arai , author T. Shibata , author S. Matsuoka , author M. J. \ Sato , author T. Yanagida , \ and\ author M. Ueda ,\ 10.1073/pnas.0908278107 journal journal Proc.\ Natl.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ USA \ volume 107 ,\ pages 12399 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    Taniguchi , author S

    author author D. Taniguchi , author S. Ishihara , author T. Oonuki , author M. Honda-Kitahara , author K. Kaneko , \ and\ author S. Sawai ,\ 10.1073/pnas.1218025110 journal journal Proc.\ Natl.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ USA \ volume 110 ,\ pages 5016 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi

  17. [25]

    \ Huang , author M

    author author C.-H. \ Huang , author M. Tang , author C. Shi , author P. A. \ Iglesias , \ and\ author P. N. \ Devreotes ,\ 10.1038/ncb2859 journal journal Nat. Cell Biol. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1307 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  18. [26]

    Takada , author N

    author author S. Takada , author N. Yoshinaga , author N. Doi , \ and\ author K. Fujiwara ,\ 10.1126/sciadv.abm8460 journal journal Sci. Adv. \ volume 8 ,\ pages eabm8460 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Ren , author H

    author author Z. Ren , author H. Weyer , author M. Sandler , author L. W\"urthner , author H. Fu , author C. B. \ Tangtartharakul , author D. Li , author C. Sou , author D. Villarreal , author J. E. \ Kim , author E. Frey , \ and\ author S. Jun ,\ 10.1038/s41567-025-02878-w jo...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Hoege \ and\ author A

    author author C. Hoege \ and\ author A. A. \ Hyman ,\ 10.1038/nrm3558 journal journal Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 315 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  21. [29]

    Has \ and\ author S

    author author C. Has \ and\ author S. L. \ Das ,\ 10.1016/j.bbagen.2021.129971 journal journal Biochim.\ Biophys.\ Acta \ volume 1865 ,\ pages 129971 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  22. [30]

    \ Tsai , author M

    author author F.-C. \ Tsai , author M. Simunovic , author B. Sorre , author A. Bertin , author J. Manzi , author A. Callan-Jones , \ and\ author P. Bassereau ,\ 10.1039/d0sm01573c journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 17 ,\ pages 4254 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d5sm00101c journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 21 ,\ pages 3922 ( year 2025 b ) NoStop

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d5sm00101c journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 21 ,\ pages 3922 ( year 2025 b ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  24. [32]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014410 journal journal Phys

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.014410 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 104 ,\ pages 014410 ( year 2021 a ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  25. [33]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1142/S021797922230002X journal journal Int

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1142/S021797922230002X journal journal Int. J. Mod. Phys. B \ volume 36 ,\ pages 2230002 ( year 2022 a ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  26. [34]

    Noguchi , author N

    author author H. Noguchi , author N. Walani , \ and\ author M. Arroyo ,\ 10.1039/d3sm00340j journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 19 ,\ pages 5300 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024403 journal journal Phys

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024403 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 109 ,\ pages 024403 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    Mim \ and\ author V

    author author C. Mim \ and\ author V. M. \ Unger ,\ @noop journal journal Trends Biochem. Sci. \ volume 37 ,\ pages 526 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  29. [37]

    Frost , author R

    author author A. Frost , author R. Perera , author A. Roux , author K. Spasov , author O. Destaing , author E. H. \ Egelman , author P. De Camilli , \ and\ author V. M. \ Unger ,\ @noop journal journal Cell \ volume 132 ,\ pages 807 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  30. [38]

    Adam , author N

    author author J. Adam , author N. Basnet , \ and\ author N. Mizuno ,\ @noop journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 15452 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  31. [39]

    Ramakrishnan , author R

    author author N. Ramakrishnan , author R. P. \ Bradley , author R. W. \ Tourdot , \ and\ author R. Radhakrishnan ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Condens. Matter \ volume 30 ,\ pages 273001 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  32. [40]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1038/srep20935 journal journal Sci.\ Rep

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1038/srep20935 journal journal Sci.\ Rep. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 20935 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  33. [41]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/5.0098249 journal journal J

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/5.0098249 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 157 ,\ pages 034901 ( year 2022 b ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    Goutaland , author F

    author author Q. Goutaland , author F. van Wijland , author J.-B. \ Fournier , \ and\ author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d1sm00027f journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 17 ,\ pages 5560 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d2sm01536f journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 19 ,\ pages 679 ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d2sm01536f journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 19 ,\ pages 679 ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d1sm01360b journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 17 ,\ pages 10469 ( year 2021 b ) NoStop

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d1sm01360b journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 17 ,\ pages 10469 ( year 2021 b ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  37. [45]

    Tamemoto \ and\ author H

    author author N. Tamemoto \ and\ author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1038/s41598-020-76695-x journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 19582 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    Tamemoto \ and\ author H

    author author N. Tamemoto \ and\ author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/d1sm00540e journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 17 ,\ pages 6589 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Tamemoto \ and\ author H

    author author N. Tamemoto \ and\ author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.024403 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 106 ,\ pages 024403 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1038/s41598-023-33376-9 journal journal Sci

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1038/s41598-023-33376-9 journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 6207 ( year 2023 b ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Nishide \ and\ author S

    author author R. Nishide \ and\ author S. Ishihara ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.224101 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 224101 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Nishide \ and\ author S

    author author R. Nishide \ and\ author S. Ishihara ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.111.L022202 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 111 ,\ pages L022202 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  43. [51]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/D4SM01277A journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 21 ,\ pages 1113 ( year 2025 c ) NoStop

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/D4SM01277A journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 21 ,\ pages 1113 ( year 2025 c ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  44. [52]

    Noguchi , author F

    author author H. Noguchi , author F. van Wijland , \ and\ author J.-B. \ Fournier ,\ 10.1063/5.0221050 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 161 ,\ pages 025101 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Noguchi \ and\ author J.-B

    author author H. Noguchi \ and\ author J.-B. \ Fournier ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ad7dac journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 26 ,\ pages 093043 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  46. [54]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/w1fg-6qmv journal journal Phys

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/w1fg-6qmv journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 033243 ( year 2025 d ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/l9qq-pcv5 journal journal Phys

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/l9qq-pcv5 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 113 ,\ pages 034210 ( year 2026 a ) NoStop

    2026 doi

  48. [56]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/5.0340324 journal journal J

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/5.0340324 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 165 ,\ pages 025102 ( year 2026 b ) NoStop

    2026 doi

  49. [57]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.78.041007 journal journal J.\ Phys.\ Soc.\ Jpn

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1143/JPSJ.78.041007 journal journal J.\ Phys.\ Soc.\ Jpn. \ volume 78 ,\ pages 041007 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  50. [58]

    Noguchi \ and\ author G

    author author H. Noguchi \ and\ author G. Gompper ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.021903 journal journal Phys.\ Rev.\ E \ volume 73 ,\ pages 021903 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006 doi

  51. [59]

    Shiba \ and\ author H

    author author H. Shiba \ and\ author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.031926 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 84 ,\ pages 031926 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  52. [60]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/1.5113646 journal journal J.\ Chem.\ Phys

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/1.5113646 journal journal J.\ Chem.\ Phys. \ volume 151 ,\ pages 094903 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  53. [61]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/c2sm26015h journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 8 ,\ pages 8926 ( year 2012 a ) NoStop

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/c2sm26015h journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 8 ,\ pages 8926 ( year 2012 a ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  54. [62]

    author author M. P. \ Allen \ and\ author D. J. \ Tildesley ,\ @noop title Computer Simulation of Liquids \ ( publisher Clarendon Press ,\ address Oxford ,\ year 1987 ) NoStop

    1987

  55. [63]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/1.3541246 journal journal J.\ Chem.\ Phys

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1063/1.3541246 journal journal J.\ Chem.\ Phys. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 055101 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  56. [64]

    author author S. E. \ Feller , author Y. Zhang , author R. W. \ Pastor , \ and\ author B. R. \ Brooks ,\ @noop journal journal J.\ Chem.\ Phys. \ volume 103 ,\ pages 4613 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  57. [65]

    Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/c2sm06943a journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 8 ,\ pages 3146 ( year 2012 b ) NoStop

    author author H. Noguchi ,\ 10.1039/c2sm06943a journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 8 ,\ pages 3146 ( year 2012 b ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  58. [66]

    author author E. A. \ Evans \ and\ author F. Ludwig ,\ @noop journal journal J.\ Phys.\ Condens.\ Matter \ volume 12 ,\ pages A315 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  59. [67]

    author author E. A. \ Evans , author V. Heinrich , author F. Ludwig , \ and\ author W. Rawicz ,\ @noop journal journal Biophys.\ J. \ volume 85 ,\ pages 2342 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  60. [68]

    author author H. V. \ Ly \ and\ author M. L. \ Longo ,\ @noop journal journal Biophys.\ J. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 1013 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  61. [69]

    author author M. A. S. \ Karal , author M. M. \ Billah , author M. Ahmed , \ and\ author M. K. \ Ahamed ,\ 10.1039/D3SM00882G journal journal Soft Matter \ volume 19 ,\ pages 8285 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  62. [70]

    Dimova ,\ 10.1016/j.cis.2014.03.003 journal journal Adv.\ Colloid\ Interface\ Sci

    author author R. Dimova ,\ 10.1016/j.cis.2014.03.003 journal journal Adv.\ Colloid\ Interface\ Sci. \ volume 208 ,\ pages 225 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  63. [71]

    Hu , author J

    author author M. Hu , author J. J. \ Briguglio , \ and\ author M. Deserno ,\ @noop journal journal Biophys. J. \ volume 102 ,\ pages 1403 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  64. [72]

    Herpich , author J

    author author T. Herpich , author J. Thingna , \ and\ author M. Esposito ,\ 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031056 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 8 ,\ pages 031056 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  65. [73]

    Agranov , author R

    author author T. Agranov , author R. L. \ Jack , author M. E. \ Cates , \ and\ author \'E . Fodor ,\ 10.1088/1367-2630/ae0c2e journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 27 ,\ pages 104602 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  66. [74]

    Yoshida ,\ 10.1038/s41428-022-00638-8 journal journal Polymer J

    author author R. Yoshida ,\ 10.1038/s41428-022-00638-8 journal journal Polymer J. \ volume 54 ,\ pages 827 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  67. [75]

    author author I. L. \ Mallphanov , author E. G. \ Chupakhin , author O. V. \ Lagunova , \ and\ author A. I. \ Lavrova ,\ 10.59761/RCR5191 journal journal Russ. Chem. Rev. \ volume 94 ,\ pages RCR5191 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  68. [76]

    Livne , author S

    author author G. Livne , author S. Gat , author S. Armon , \ and\ author A. Bernheim-Groswasser ,\ 10.1073/pnas.2309125121 journal journal Proc.\ Natl.\ Acad.\ Sci.\ USA \ volume 121 ,\ pages e2309125121 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  69. [77]

    Tang , author T

    author author Z. Tang , author T. Enomoto , author T. Ueki , author R. Tamate , author A. M. \ Akimoto , \ and\ author R. Yoshida ,\ 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c06076 journal journal Langmuir \ volume 42 ,\ pages 5705 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

    2026 doi

  70. [78]

    Ertl ,\ 10.1002/anie.200800480 journal journal Angew

    author author G. Ertl ,\ 10.1002/anie.200800480 journal journal Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. \ volume 47 ,\ pages 3524 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  71. [79]

    Br \"a r , author N

    author author M. Br \"a r , author N. Gottschalk , author M. Eiswirth , \ and\ author G. Ertl ,\ 10.1063/1.466650 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 100 ,\ pages 1202 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  72. [80]

    Gorodetskii , author J

    author author V. Gorodetskii , author J. Lauterbach , author H.-H. \ Rotermund , author J. H. \ Block , \ and\ author G. Ertl ,\ 10.1038/370276a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 370 ,\ pages 276 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  73. [81]

    Schaak \ and\ author R

    author author A. Schaak \ and\ author R. Imbihl ,\ 10.1063/1.1469601 journal journal J. Chem. Phys. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 9021 ( year 2002 ) NoStop

    2002 doi

  74. [82]

    Barroo , author Z.-J

    author author C. Barroo , author Z.-J. \ Wang , author R. Schlr \"o gl , \ and\ author M.-G. \ Willinger ,\ 10.1038/s41929-019-0395-3 journal journal Nat. Catal. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 30 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  75. [83]

    Tang , author W

    author author M. Tang , author W. Yuan , author Y. Ou , author G. Li , author R. You , author S. Li , author H. Yang , author Z. Zhang , \ and\ author Y. Wang ,\ 10.1021/acscatal.0c03335 journal journal ACS Catal. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 14419 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  76. [84]

    Ghosh , author J

    author author T. Ghosh , author J. M. \ Arce-Ramos , author W.-Q. \ Li , author H. Yan , author S. W. \ Chee , author A. Genest , \ and\ author U. Mirsaidov ,\ 10.1038/s41467-022-33304-x journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 6176 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.