Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 109 references

On the Structural Limits of Machine Learning Decision Systems: An Information-Theoretic, Interaction-Based, and Stochastic-Dynamical Perspective

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Machine learning performance is capped by information-theoretic bounds that depend on the data model, not the algorithm.

desk verdict A serviceable review of known results whose central derived bound in Section 2 is wrongly derived; the survey could be useful after correction, but as is it overstates what it shows. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13510 v1 pith:5VPXUO2V submitted 2026-08-13 math.ST cs.LGstat.TH

Nestor R. Barraza , Gabriel Pena This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.STcs.LGstat.TH MSC 62B1094A1762F1260J2062M40
keywords information-theoreticlimitsFanoinequalityCramér-RaobounddataprocessingMarkovrandomfieldsergodicitypathdependenceLLMagents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that every data-driven learning system is confined by information-theoretic bounds that no algorithmic refinement can overcome. In classification, Fano's inequality ties the minimum error probability to the mutual information between the true label and the available observations; in parametric estimation, the Cramér–Rao bound ties achievable precision to the Fisher information of the chosen model. Because these limits depend on the model of the data-generating process rather than on the algorithm, the only way to lower them is to adopt a more faithful model of the data. The paper develops this structural view across interaction-based models such as Markov random fields and stochastic-dynamical descriptions of decision systems, including LLM-based agents. The takeaway is that model selection, not algorithmic sophistication, is the primary lever on predictive performance.

What carries the argument

The argument's machinery is the pair of classical inequalities, Fano's inequality and the Cramér–Rao bound, applied as structural constraints rather than as estimation tools. The Markov chain $X \to Y \to \hat{X}$ sets the stage: the data processing inequality $I(X;\hat{X}) \le I(X;Y)$ says processing cannot create information, and Fano's bound $H(X|\hat{X}) \le H_2(P_e) + P_e \log(|\mathcal{X}|-1)$ turns available mutual information into a minimum error probability. For continuous parameters, the Fisher information matrix inserted into the Cramér–Rao inequality gives a minimum covariance. The paper also uses Markov random field clique potentials and birth-death or Polya-type rates to show how local interactions produce emergent global structure, and it casts decision systems as stochastic dynamical processes with state-dependent feedback.

What would settle it

Estimate the true $I(X;Y)$ from a known generative process, compute the Fano lower bound on classification error, and check whether a trained classifier's held-out error falls below it; a single counterexample would refute the structural claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that informational bounds are structural and algorithm-independent. For the Markov chain $X \to Y \to \hat{X}$, the data processing inequality caps the estimator's mutual information by $I(X;Y) \le I(X;Y)$, Fano's inequality converts that information into a lower bound on classification error, and the Cramér–Rao inequality caps any unbiased estimator's covariance by the inverse Fisher information matrix. The only way to raise these ceilings is to choose a better model of the data, because a worse model yields less available information and therefore a tighter effective bound. Algorithmic learning, in this view, reorganizes information already present in the generative process; it does not create it.

Load-bearing premise

The bounds presuppose a fixed, well-defined probability distribution linking $X$, $Y$, and $\hat{X}$ through the Markov chain $X \to Y \to \hat{X}$; if the data-generating process is non-stationary, non-ergodic, or not identifiable, the bounds do not directly constrain any particular estimator.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • No amount of network capacity, data augmentation, or optimization effort can push a classifier below the error floor set by the mutual information between the true class and the available features.
  • Regression precision is capped by the Fisher information of the chosen parametric family; switching families, not adding parameters to a bad family, is the route to lower variance.
  • Violations of independence, ergodicity, or stationarity make classical convergence guarantees inapplicable, so accuracy claims based on law-of-large-numbers or central-limit reasoning can fail silently.
  • Decision systems that include LLM agents should be modeled as feedback-driven stochastic processes, with path dependence and emergent behavior treated as first-class phenomena rather than accidents.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's logic suggests a testable extension: benchmarks comparing models should report the Fano or Cramér–Rao bound implied by the data-generating process alongside realized error, to separate structural limits from algorithmic slack.
  • If LLM agents are path-dependent stochastic processes, then evaluation protocols that average over many independent rollouts may miss regime-specific behavior; single-trajectory deployments may be better characterized by ergodic theory.
  • The framework implies that 'foundation model' improvements are effective only insofar as they encode better interaction structure of the data, not as raw parameter count.
  • The interaction-based view suggests that data augmentation should be judged by whether it enriches the modeled mutual information between inputs and targets, not merely by whether it improves a validation score.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review/perspective on structural limits of machine learning decision systems. It argues that information-theoretic bounds (Fano's inequality for classification and Cramér-Rao for estimation) are algorithm-independent and depend only on the data-generating model, that statistical assumptions such as ergodicity and independence are often violated in practice, and that interaction-based models (MRFs, stochastic dynamical systems, birth-death processes) provide the right modeling language to understand these limits. The paper then frames LLM-agent decision systems as stochastic dynamical processes with feedback. The contribution is conceptual rather than technical: no new theorems are proven.

Significance. The paper's central claim is standard and, with a corrected derivation in Section 2.1, true: any estimator is constrained by the information that Y carries about X. The review covers a reasonable range of topics and correctly states several classical results, including the data processing inequality, the Cramér-Rao bound (with the usual regularity conditions), and the Hammersley-Clifford theorem. Its value is pedagogical. However, the paper does not offer new formal results, and the key classification bound in Eq. (3) is currently derived incorrectly; the mathematical errors identified below must be fixed before the central message can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eq. (3)] The derivation of Eq. (3) is invalid as a consequence of Fano's inequality. Fano gives an upper bound on H(X|Xhat), namely H(X|Xhat) ≤ H2(Pe)+Pe log(|X|-1). To lower-bound Pe, one needs a lower bound on H(X|Xhat) = H(X)-I(X;Xhat). The manuscript replaces H(X) by its upper bound log|X|, which yields an upper bound on H(X|Xhat), not a lower bound. Concretely, let X be deterministic on a 3-class alphabet, Y=X, and Xhat=Y; then H(X)=0, I(X;Xhat)=0, and Pe=0, but Eq. (3) would give Pe ≥ 1 - log 2 / log 3 ≈ 0.37. Furthermore, the bound as written depends on I(X;Xhat), which is estimator-specific; an algorithm-independent bound would use the data processing inequality to place I(X;Y) instead and would require an explicit assumption about H(X) (e.g., uniformity) or a lower bound on H(X|Y). Because the Section 2 conclusion and the abstract's claim of algorithm-independent limits rely on this equation, Eq. (3) must be re-derived under stated assumptions.
  2. [Section 4.3, Eqs. (10)-(11)] The sentence following Eqs. (10)-(11) misstates the meaning of p(k,t). In the birth-death master equation, p(k,t) is the probability that the system is in state k at time t; it is not 'the probability of a particle performing a transition of size k in a time interval of length t.' The terms λ(k,t) and μ(k,t) are transition rates out of state k, and the right-hand side is a flow balance. This error matters because the subsequent GPP example is used to illustrate path-dependent Markovian dynamics; the text should be corrected to describe p(k,t) as the state-occupancy probability.
  3. [Section 2.1, paragraph after Eq. (3)] The statement that 'if the support X is not finite but the mutual information is finite, then we will see an error almost surely' is false. For example, let X take value 0 with probability 1/2 and value n with probability 2^{-n-1} for n≥1; let Y=X and Xhat=Y. The support is infinite, I(X;Xhat)=H(X)<∞, and Pe=0. A condition such as H(X)=∞ would be needed for the claim; as written it should be removed or qualified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] There are typos in this section: 'ussually' should be 'usually' and 'sophisticate' should be 'sophisticated'; additionally, the notation I(X, Xhat) should consistently use a semicolon as in I(X; Xhat).
  2. [Section 2.2, Eq. (4)] The symbol I is used for both the identity matrix and the Fisher information matrix; use a distinct symbol (e.g., Id) for the identity, and state the standard regularity conditions under which the Cramér-Rao bound applies.
  3. [Section 4.1 and Table 1] The word 'vertexes' should be 'vertices', and in Table 1 the row beginning with 'Self-potential' is misaligned with the column labels, making the table difficult to parse.
  4. [References] The entry for Hammersley and Clifford contains the typo 'Unppublished' for 'Unpublished'; the paper would also benefit from citing a modern treatment of Fano's inequality that states the exact conditions used.
  5. [Spanish abstract] The Spanish abstract contains the typo 'estocásaticos realimentados', which should be 'estocásticos realimentados'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core information-theoretic bounds rest on standard external references, and the paper's self-citations appear only in illustrative examples.

full rationale

The paper makes no empirical predictions and fits no parameters, so the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern does not arise. The two central bounds (the data-processing inequality, Fano inequality, and the Cramér-Rao bound) are quoted from external standard references such as Cover and Thomas and Scarlett and Cevher, not from the authors' prior work. The self-citations that do occur are illustrative and non-load-bearing: Barraza et al. 2019 is a general pointer for mutual information in feature selection; Barraza et al. 2020/2025, Pena et al. 2022, and Barraza 2008 appear in the stochastic-process and frequency-estimator examples. No uniqueness theorem from the authors is invoked, and no ansatz is smuggled in under a self-citation. The questionable derivation of Eq. (3) from Fano's inequality is a mathematical-correctness concern (the argument replaces H(X) by an upper bound in a lower-bound argument), not a circularity, because the bound is not assumed as its own conclusion. Overall, the manuscript's derivation chain is self-contained with respect to external sources, so circularity is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contains no data fitting. All parameters in examples, such as potentials in Table 1 and GPP rates, are illustrative and drawn from cited work; they do not enter the central argument as fitted quantities.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Fano's inequality and the data processing inequality hold as stated for the Markov chain X->Y->X_hat.
    Section 2.1 invokes them without proof, citing Cover and Thomas, and Scarlett and Cevher.
  • standard math The Cramér-Rao bound applies to the parametric estimation setting with a fixed family p(X,theta).
    Section 2.2 builds the regression analysis on this inequality and assumes unbiasedness for the simplified form.
  • standard math Hammersley-Clifford theorem permits factorization of strictly positive MRF joint distributions over cliques.
    Section 4.1 relies on this theorem to write Eq. (6), citing Besag, Griffeath, and Hammersley and Clifford.
  • domain assumption Classical CLT and LLN require finite second moments and sufficiently weak dependence or strict stationarity for increments.
    Section 3.1 explains when these conditions fail, using this as background to argue that implicit assumptions matter.
  • standard math Birth-death Kolmogorov forward equations correctly describe the probability mass evolution for integer-valued processes.
    Section 4.3 presents Eqs. (10)-(11) without derivation and interprets them as the discrete analogue of Fokker-Planck.
  • domain assumption The data are generated by a fixed probability distribution with well-defined entropy and Fisher information.
    Section 2 assumes X->Y->X_hat and a parametric family p(X,theta); Section 3 later questions this for non-stationary or non-ergodic processes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the Structural Limits of Machine Learning Decision Systems: An Information-Theoretic, Interaction-Based, and Stochastic-Dynamical Perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5VPXUO2V

@misc{pith2026260813510,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the Structural Limits of Machine Learning Decision Systems: An Information-Theoretic, Interaction-Based, and Stochastic-Dynamical Perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5VPXUO2V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13510}
}
read the original abstract

Machine learning procedures are commonly evaluated in terms of predictive accuracy and computational efficiency. However, their achievable performance is fundamentally constrained by structural properties of the underlying data-generating process, which are formalized in terms of informational bounds. In this work we examine intrinsic limits of data-driven decision systems from an information-theoretic and interaction-based perspective. We analyze minimal achievable error in classification through Fano-type bounds and precision limits in parametric estimation via the Cram\'er-Rao inequality, emphasizing that such limits depend on the underlying model rather than on algorithmic sophistication alone. We further discuss how implicit assumptions, such as independence, ergodicity, and distributional stability, affect the validity of inferential procedures. Building on interaction-based modeling principles, we review typical frameworks such as Markov Random Fields and potential based representations for encoding dependence mechanisms. We also describe decision systems, including LLM-integrated agent architectures, as feedback-driven stochastic processes where state-dependent dynamics may induce emergent macroscopic behavior. This perspective highlights the importance of having adequate models for the data as a prerequi- site for expanding predictive capability, and situates algorithmic learning within the informational limits imposed by the models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    CESNET-TimeSeries24: Time Series Dataset for Network Traffic Anomaly Detection and Forecasting , journal=

    Koumar, Josef and Hynek, Karel and. CESNET-TimeSeries24: Time Series Dataset for Network Traffic Anomaly Detection and Forecasting , journal=. 2025 , month=. doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04603-x , url=

    work page doi:10.1038/s41597-025-04603-x 2025

  2. [2]

    Advances in mathematical physics , year =

    Konno, Hidetoshi , title =. Advances in mathematical physics , year =

  3. [3]

    Characterization of the generalized

    Cha, Ji Hwan , year =. Characterization of the generalized. Advances in Applied Probability , publisher =

  4. [4]

    Extensions of the Generalized

    Badía, Francisco Germán and Mercier, Sophie and Sangüesa, Carmen , journal =. Extensions of the Generalized

  5. [5]

    Journal of Applied Probability , publisher =

    Queues with path-dependent arrival processes , author =. Journal of Applied Probability , publisher =

  6. [6]

    2022 , journal =

    Heavy traffic limits for queues with non-stationary path-dependent arrival processes , author =. 2022 , journal =

    2022

  7. [7]

    2013 , author =

    New constant service time Polya/D/n traffic model with peaked input stream , journal =. 2013 , author =

    2013

  8. [8]

    Electronics Letters , volume =

    Mirtchev, Seferin and Ganchev, Ivan , year =. Electronics Letters , volume =

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    and Fuja, T

    Alajaji, F. and Fuja, T. , journal=. A communication channel modeled on contagion , year=. doi:10.1109/18.340476 , ISSN=

    doi

  2. [10]

    2016 , issn =

    A generalized-growth model to characterize the early ascending phase of infectious disease outbreaks , journal =. 2016 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2016.01.002 , url =

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Banerjee and P

    A. Banerjee and P. Burlina and F. Alajaji , journal=. Image segmentation and labeling using the Polya urn model , year=. doi:10.1109/83.784436 , ISSN=

    doi

  4. [12]

    and Zhang, Xuemei and Pham, Loan , journal=

    Jeske, Daniel R. and Zhang, Xuemei and Pham, Loan , journal=. Adjusting software failure rates that are estimated from test data , year=. doi:10.1109/TR.2004.842531 , ISSN=

    2004

  5. [13]

    IJCA Special Issue on Issues and Challenges in Networking, Intelligence and Computing Technologies , year =

    Pankaj Nagar and Blessy Thankachan , title =. IJCA Special Issue on Issues and Challenges in Networking, Intelligence and Computing Technologies , year =

  6. [14]

    S. A. IEEE Transactions on Reliability , title=. 1993 , volume=. doi:10.1109/24.273589 , ISSN=

    1993 doi

  7. [15]

    , journal =

    Minkova, Leda D. , journal =. The Pólya-Aeppli process and ruin problems , url =

  8. [16]

    Ahmad and Md

    N. Ahmad and Md. Zafar Imam , title =. International Journal of Computer Applications , year =

  9. [17]

    Ahmad and G

    N. Ahmad and G. M. Khan and L. S. Rafi , title =. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security , year =

  10. [18]

    1983 , volume =

    Yamada, Shigeru and Ohba, Mitsuru and Osaki, Shunji , journal =. 1983 , volume =. doi:10.1109/TR.1983.5221735 , ISSN =

    1983

  11. [19]

    Introducing the non-homogeneous compound-birth process , journal =

    Sendova, Kristina and Minkova, Leda , year =. Introducing the non-homogeneous compound-birth process , journal =

  12. [20]

    2011 , doi =

    Mishra, Sharmistha and Fisman, David N and Boily, Marie-Claude , title =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  13. [21]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    Kermack, William Ogilvy and McKendrick, Anderson G , title =. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, containing papers of a mathematical and physical character , year =

  14. [22]

    Statistically-based methodology for revealing real contagion trends and correcting delay-induced errors in the assessment of

    Contreras, Sebasti. Statistically-based methodology for revealing real contagion trends and correcting delay-induced errors in the assessment of. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , year =

  15. [23]

    Unravelling the origins of anomalous diffusion: From molecules to migrating storks , author =. Phys. Rev. Res. , volume =. 2022 , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033055 , url =

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    Silva and Paulo V.C

    Petrônio C.L. Silva and Paulo V.C. Batista and Hélder S. Lima and Marcos A. Alves and Frederico G. Guimarães and Rodrigo C.P. Silva , title =. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , year =

  17. [25]

    Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , year =

    Ramon Gomes. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , year =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110027 , url =

    2020

  18. [26]

    Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , year =

    Matheus Henrique Dal Molin Ribeiro and Ramon Gomes. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , year =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109853 , url =

    2020

  19. [27]

    Physics of Life Reviews , year =

    Chowell, Gerardo and Sattenspiel, Lisa and Bansal, Shweta and Viboud, Cécile , title =. Physics of Life Reviews , year =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2016.07.005 , url =

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    Udny Yule , journal =

    G. Udny Yule , journal =. A Mathematical Theory of Evolution, Based on the Conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. , volume =

  21. [29]

    On Fluctuation Phenomena in the Passage of High Energy Electrons through Lead , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =. 1937 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.52.569 , url =

    1937 doi

  22. [30]

    M'Kendrick, A. G. , journal =. Applications of Mathematics to Medical Problems , year =. doi:10.1017/S0013091500034428 , publisher =

    doi

  23. [31]

    2019 , journal =

    On the Convergence of Negative Binomial Distribution , author =. 2019 , journal =

    2019

  24. [32]

    , journal=

    López-Benítez, Miguel and Majumdar, Chitradeep and Merchant, Shabbir N. , journal=. Aggregated Traffic Models for Real-World Data in the Internet of Things , year=

  25. [33]

    IoT , VOLUME =

    Nguyen-An, Hung and Silverston, Thomas and Yamazaki, Taku and Miyoshi, Takumi , TITLE =. IoT , VOLUME =. 2021 , NUMBER =

    2021

  26. [34]

    , journal=

    Metzger, Florian and Hoßfeld, Tobias and Bauer, André and Kounev, Samuel and Heegaard, Poul E. , journal=. Modeling of Aggregated IoT Traffic and Its Application to an IoT Cloud , year=

  27. [35]

    2021 , volume=

    Clavier, Laurent and Pedersen, Troels and Larrad, Ignacio and Lauridsen, Mads and Egan, Malcolm , journal=. 2021 , volume=

    2021

  28. [36]

    Erlang, A. K. , title =. Elektroteknikeren , year =

  29. [37]

    and Roughan, M

    Erramilli, A. and Roughan, M. and Veitch, D. and Willinger, W. , journal=. Self-similar traffic and network dynamics , year=

  30. [38]

    AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =

    Scher, Harvey , title =. AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =

  31. [39]

    Discrete hopping model of exciton transport in disordered media , author =. Phys. Rev. B , volume =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.075206 , url =

    2005 doi

  32. [40]

    Ingeniería , year=

    Modelos de Tráfico en Análisis y Control de Redes de Comunicaciones , author=. Ingeniería , year=

  33. [41]

    Resnick, Sidney and Rootzén, Holger , title =

  34. [42]

    , publisher =

    Feller, W. , publisher =. An introduction to probability theory and its applications , volume =. 1968 , edition =

    1968

  35. [43]

    2018 , publisher =

    Gross, Donald and Shortle, John and Thompson, James and Harris, Carl , title =. 2018 , publisher =

    2018

  36. [44]

    Lundberg, Ove , year =

  37. [45]

    2007 , publisher =

    Mathematical methods in risk theory , author =. 2007 , publisher =

    2007

  38. [46]

    2015 , publisher =

    Recurrent Event Modeling Based on the Yule Process: Application to Water Network Asset Management , author =. 2015 , publisher =

    2015

  39. [47]

    2019 , edition =

    Introduction to Probability Models , author =. 2019 , edition =

    2019

  40. [48]

    2008 , publisher =

    Stochastic Processes , author =. 2008 , publisher =

    2008

  41. [49]

    2020 , city =

    An Introduction to Stochastic Processes , author =. 2020 , city =

    2020

  42. [50]

    2005 , publisher =

    An Introduction to Markov Processes , author =. 2005 , publisher =

    2005

  43. [51]

    Mathematical Theory of Reliability , author=

  44. [52]

    2010 , isbn =

    Pham, Hoang , title =. 2010 , isbn =

    2010

  45. [53]

    and Iannino, Anthony and Okumoto, Kazuhira , title =

    Musa, John D. and Iannino, Anthony and Okumoto, Kazuhira , title =. 1987 , isbn =

    1987

  46. [54]

    1955 , author =

    Theory of ordinary differential equations , publisher =. 1955 , author =

    1955

  47. [55]

    2018 , author =

    Real analysis and probability , publisher =. 2018 , author =

    2018

  48. [56]

    , edition =

    Li, Michael Y. , edition =. An Introduction to Mathematical Modeling of Infectious Diseases , doi =

  49. [57]

    Grandell , publisher =

    J. Grandell , publisher =. Mixed. 1997 , volume =

    1997

  50. [58]

    and Panjer, Harry H

    Klugman, Stuart A. and Panjer, Harry H. and Willmot, Gordon E. , publisher =. Loss models: Further topics , year =

  51. [59]

    2002 , edition =

    Whitt, Ward , title =. 2002 , edition =

    2002

  52. [60]

    Digital Signal Processing , publisher =

    Moving Average Filters , editor =. Digital Signal Processing , publisher =. 2003 , isbn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7444-7/50052-2 , url =

    2003 doi

  53. [61]

    doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess2011 , booktitle =

    Pfeifer, Dietmar , publisher =. doi:10.1002/0471667196.ess2011 , booktitle =

    doi

  54. [62]

    Modeling the Spread of Infectious Diseases: A Review , booktitle =

    Chen, Dongmei , publisher =. Modeling the Spread of Infectious Diseases: A Review , booktitle =. doi:10.1002/9781118630013.ch2 , url =

    doi

  55. [63]

    , title =

    Chen, Thomas M. , title =. The Handbook of Computer Networks , editor =

  56. [64]

    Study of Preemptive Priority Single-server Queue with Peaked Arrival Flow , year=

    Mirtchev, Seferin , booktitle=. Study of Preemptive Priority Single-server Queue with Peaked Arrival Flow , year=

  57. [65]

    Time-window

    Cordelli, Ermanno and Tortora, Matteo and Sicilia, Rosa and Soda, Paolo , booktitle =. Time-window. 2020 , organization =

    2020

  58. [66]

    , booktitle=

    Hoßfeld, Tobias and Metzger, Florian and Heegaard, Poul E. , booktitle=. Traffic modeling for aggregated periodic IoT data , year=

  59. [67]

    Majumdar, Chitradeep and López-Benítez, Miguel and Merchant, S. N. , booktitle=. Experimental Evaluation of the Poissoness of Real Sensor Data Traffic in the Internet of Things , year=

  60. [68]

    Reliable Software Technologies - Ada-Europe 2000, 5th Ada-Europe International Conference, Potsdam, Germany, June 26-30, 2000, Proceedings , year =

    Barraza, Néstor Rubén and Pfefferman, Jonás and Cernuschi-Frías, Bruno and Cernuschi, Félix , title =. Reliable Software Technologies - Ada-Europe 2000, 5th Ada-Europe International Conference, Potsdam, Germany, June 26-30, 2000, Proceedings , year =. doi:10.1007/10722060\_18 ...

    doi

  61. [69]

    Empirical

    Barraza, Néstor Rubeé , booktitle =. Empirical. 2014 , pages =

    2014

  62. [70]

    Pena and G

    G. Pena and G. Cozzi and N. R. Barraza , booktitle =. Aplicación de los procesos de nacimientos puros en confiabilidad de software , year =

  63. [71]

    N. R. Barraza and S. Moro and Marcelo Ferreyra and Adolfo de la Pe\ ana , booktitle=. Information Theory based Feature Selection for Customer Classification , year=

  64. [72]

    Journal of Information Science , volume =

    Néstor Barraza and Sérgio Moro and Marcelo Ferreyra and Adolfo de la Peña , title =. Journal of Information Science , volume =. 2019 , doi =. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551518770967 , abstract =

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    Software Reliability Modeled on Contagion , year=

    Barraza, Néstor Rubén , booktitle=. Software Reliability Modeled on Contagion , year=. doi:10.1109/ISSREW.2016.22 , month=

    2016 doi

  66. [74]

    Barraza, Néstor Rubén , booktitle =. Mining. 2017 , month =

    2017

  67. [75]

    Barraza, Néstor Rubén , booktitle=. Mining. 2017 , pages=. doi:10.1109/CLEI.2017.8226412 , month=

    2017

  68. [76]

    A logarithmic burst-noise channel performance analysis and simulation , year=

    Iglesias, Mariano Agustin and Barraza, Nestor Ruben , booktitle=. A logarithmic burst-noise channel performance analysis and simulation , year=

  69. [77]

    VII Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Informática - Sistemas de Información , title =

    Barraza, Néstor Rubén and Pena, Gabriel , year =. VII Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Informática - Sistemas de Información , title =

  70. [78]

    Recent Advancements in Software Reliability Assurance , publisher =

    Barraza, Néstor Rubén , title =. Recent Advancements in Software Reliability Assurance , publisher =. 2019 , pages =

    2019

  71. [79]

    System Performance Modeling , publisher =

    Pena, Gabriel and Barraza, Néstor Rubén , title =. System Performance Modeling , publisher =. 2020 , chapter =

    2020

  72. [80]

    Anales de ASSE 2020 , year =

    Tiempo medio entre fallas: investigación de confiabilidad de proyectos ágiles y estudio comparativo de modelos , author =. Anales de ASSE 2020 , year =

    2020

  73. [81]

    2020 , doi =

    Chaos, Solitons & Fractals , volume =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  74. [82]

    Moreno and G

    V. Moreno and G. Pena and N. R. Barraza , year =. Procesos de nacimientos no homogéneos y su aplicación a la pandemia del COVID-19

  75. [83]

    Stochastic Modeling of the Mean Time Between Software Failures: A review , year =

    Pena, Gabriel and Moreno, Verónica and Barraza, Néstor Rubén , booktitle =. Stochastic Modeling of the Mean Time Between Software Failures: A review , year =

  76. [84]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2022-0106 , year =

    Pena, Gabriel and Moreno, Verónica and Barraza, Néstor Rubén , journal =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/em-2022-0106 , year =

    2022 doi

  77. [85]

    Identifying the Most Relevant Attributes to Explain Peaks of COVID-19 Infections and Deaths by Machine Learning Methods , volume =

    Pena, Gabriel and Barraza, Néstor Rubén and Gambini, Juliana , year =. Identifying the Most Relevant Attributes to Explain Peaks of COVID-19 Infections and Deaths by Machine Learning Methods , volume =

  78. [86]

    Network traffic modeled on path dependent queues , year=

    Pena, Gabriel and Barraza, Néstor Rubén and Gambini, Juliana , booktitle=. Network traffic modeled on path dependent queues , year=

  79. [87]

    2025 , month = feb, publisher =

    Barraza, Nestor R and Pena, Gabriel and Gambini, Juliana and Carusela, María Florencia , title =. 2025 , month = feb, publisher =. doi:10.1088/1751-8121/adb6df , url =

    2025 doi

  80. [88]

    Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

    Attention is All you Need , author=. Neural Information Processing Systems , year=

  81. [89]

    2023 , publisher =

    Pena, Gabriel , title =. 2023 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8166289 , url =

    2023 doi

  82. [90]

    2022 , publisher =

    Pena, Gabriel , title =. 2022 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6988290 , url =

    2022 doi

  83. [91]

    2021 , publisher =

    Pena, Gabriel , title =. 2021 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.5722336 , url =

    2021 doi

  84. [92]

    2021 , publisher =

    Pena, Gabriel , title =. 2021 , publisher =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4609431 , url =

    2021 doi

  85. [93]

    Arévalo and J

    Rubén V. Arévalo and J. Alberto Conejero and Òscar Garibo-i-Orts and Alfred Peris , keywords =. Stock volatility as an anomalous diffusion process , journal =. 2024 , issn =. doi:10.3934/math.20241663 , url =

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    A Sigmoid Generalized Polya Process for Describing Network Traffic , year=

    Pena, Gabriel and Barraza, Néstor Rubén and Gambini, Juliana , booktitle=. A Sigmoid Generalized Polya Process for Describing Network Traffic , year=

  87. [95]

    , title =

    Barraza, Nestor R. , title =. AIP Conference Proceedings , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.3038987 , url =

    2008 doi

  88. [96]

    1971 , booktitle=

    Markov fields on finite graphs and lattices , author=. 1971 , booktitle=

    1971

  89. [97]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B , volume=

    Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

    1974

  90. [98]

    Denumerable Markov Chains ,

    David Griffeath , title =. Denumerable Markov Chains ,. 1976 , chapter =

    1976

  91. [99]

    A Stochastic Differential Equation Framework for Multi-Objective

    Shivani Shukla and Himanshu Joshi , year=. A Stochastic Differential Equation Framework for Multi-Objective. 2510.10739 , archivePrefix=

  92. [100]

    A Stochastic Dynamical Theory of

    Jack David Carson , year=. A Stochastic Dynamical Theory of. 2501.16783 , archivePrefix=

    arXiv

  93. [101]

    2025 , eprint=

    Detailed balance in large language model-driven agents , author=. 2025 , eprint=

    2025

  94. [102]

    A Comprehensive Survey of Multiagent Reinforcement Learning , year=

    Busoniu, Lucian and Babuska, Robert and De Schutter, Bart , journal=. A Comprehensive Survey of Multiagent Reinforcement Learning , year=

  95. [103]

    An Introductory Guide to Fano’s Inequality with Applications in Statistical Estimation , booktitle=

    Scarlett, Jonathan and Cevher, Volkan , editor=. An Introductory Guide to Fano’s Inequality with Applications in Statistical Estimation , booktitle=. 2021 , pages=

    2021

  96. [104]

    Cover, T. M. and Thomas, J. A. , title =. 2005 , doi =

    2005

  97. [105]

    Rasmussen, C. E. and Williams, C. K. I. , title =. 2005 , publisher =

    2005

  98. [106]

    2009 , isbn =

    Mézard, Marc and Montanari, Andrea , title =. 2009 , isbn =. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570837.001.0001 , url =

    2009

  99. [107]

    Baxter, R. J. , year =. Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics , publisher =

  100. [108]

    2001 , publisher =

    Kohonen, Teuvo , title =. 2001 , publisher =

    2001

  101. [109]

    Johnson, N. L. and Kotz, S. , year =. Urn Models and Their Application: an approach to modern discrete probability theory , series =

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.