Localised Horizons and Holographic Thermodynamics: Supercooling in the 1/D Expansion

Gaurang Ramakant Kane; Prateek Agrawal; Vazha Loladze

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 81 references

Localised Horizons and Holographic Thermodynamics: Supercooling in the 1/D Expansion

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a wide class of holographic gauge theories far from conformality, the maximum supercooling of the confinement transition is fixed by the speed of sound at the critical temperature: $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = c_s^2(T_c)/2$.

desk verdict A clean 1/D derivation of a new universal supercooling relation in Einstein-scalar gravity, with a load-bearing IR assumption that the paper states but does not prove. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.13557 v1 pith:STZ3YDBZ submitted 2026-08-13 hep-th hep-lathep-ph

Prateek Agrawal , Gaurang Ramakant Kane , Vazha Loladze This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thhep-lathep-ph

keywords holographicconfinementtransition1/DexpansionsupercoolingEinstein-scalargravityHawking-PagespeedofsoundblackbranethermodynamicslargeDlimit

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a universal relation for the thermal deconfinement transition in a wide class of holographic gauge theories far from conformality: the maximum possible supercooling of the metastable deconfined phase is set, at leading order, by the thermodynamic speed of sound at the critical temperature, $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = 1 - T_{\rm min}/T_c = c_s^2(T_c)/2$. The derivation works in $D+1$-dimensional Einstein-scalar gravity, treating the number of spacetime dimensions $D$ as large. At leading order in $1/D$ the black-brane geometry is analytically tractable because its effects are localized near the horizon, and the result is independent of the detailed shape of the scalar potential. If true, this replaces a model-by-model numerical problem with a single model-independent prediction that can be checked, for example, on the lattice.

What carries the argument

The central object is the superpotential $W(\phi)$, the single function whose derivatives encode the scalar potential in Einstein-scalar gravity, together with the $1/D$ boundary-layer structure it controls. In $D+1$ spacetime dimensions the blackening factor $f(u)$ changes from $0$ at the horizon to $1$ over a distance $L_{\rm eff}/D$, much shorter than the local AdS curvature scale $L_{\rm eff} = |\dot A(u_h)|^{-1}$; this separation lets the paper match a near-horizon layer to the far-region superpotential flow equations $\dot A = -W$ and $\dot\phi = 2(D-1)W'$. The thermodynamic engine is the Hawking temperature formula $T = (D/4\pi) e^{A(u_h)}|\dot A(u_h)|$, whose minimum defines $T_{\rm min}$ through the two conditions $(W'/W)^2 = 1/(2D)$ and $W''/W = (1+\delta)/(2D)$. The free-energy integral localizes near $\phi_{\min}$ because of the factor $e^{(D-1)A}$, and a Taylor expansion around $\phi_{\min}$ produces the master identity $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = \delta/D^2 = c_s^2(T_c)/2$.

What would settle it

Construct a holographic model satisfying the stated slow-variation conditions but with an IR warp-factor plateau, or with a thermodynamically stable small-black-brane branch, and compute $\epsilon_{\rm sc}$ and $c_s^2(T_c)$ numerically: a deviation from $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = c_s^2(T_c)/2$ would falsify the claim. Alternatively, on the lattice, measure both $T_{\min}/T_c$ and the sound speed just above $T_c$ in SU(3) Yang-Mills and check whether $1 - T_{\min}/T_c$ equals $c_s^2(T_c)/2$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, for any Einstein-scalar holographic model whose superpotential obeys the slow-variation conditions $(W'/W)^2 \ll D/[2(D-1)]$ and $W''/W \ll D/[2(D-1)]$ near the transition, the black brane dual to the deconfined phase can be constructed analytically in a $1/D$ expansion. The blackening function equals $1 - \exp(D(u-u_h)/L_{\rm eff})$, so horizon effects are confined to a layer of size $L_{\rm eff}/D$. The Hawking temperature as a function of the horizon scalar $\phi_h$ then has a minimum $T_{\rm min}$, and the free-energy difference between the black-brane and deformed-AdS phases vanishes at $T_c = T_{\rm min}(1 + \delta/D^2)$. The same combination $\delta/D^2$ appears in the deconfined sound speed, $c_s^2(T_c) = 2\delta/D^2$, giving the identity $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = c_s^2(T_c)/2$, with corrections of order $1/D$ and $(c_s/c_{s,\rm CFT})^2$. The paper verifies this identity numerically for an exponential superpotential and reports agreement with improved holography and with $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills on a sphere.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes the deep-infrared geometry is tame in a specific sense: the warp factor keeps decreasing steadily to minus infinity with a nonzero asymptotic slope, and the temperature as a function of the horizon scalar has no extra extrema, so the far-infrared part of the free-energy integral is exponentially suppressed; if this fails, $T_c$ is not within $1/D$ of $T_{\min}$ and the relation $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = c_s^2(T_c)/2$ is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A lattice measurement of the sound speed just above $T_c$ in SU(3) Yang-Mills, where $c_s^2(T_c) \simeq 0.013$, translates through the identity into sub-percent maximum supercooling.
The maximum supercooling is generically suppressed as $1/D^2$, so in $D=4$ models far from conformality the deconfined phase can cool only a little below $T_c$ before the transition completes.
The result is independent of the detailed form of the scalar potential, so the same relation should hold across exponential-superpotential, improved-holography, and similar holographic constructions within the stated validity window.
The formula does not apply to near-conformal theories, where the expansion parameter $(c_s/c_{s,\rm CFT})^2$ is of order one and supercooling can be large; the paper explicitly excludes that regime.
The $1/D^2$ suppression in the examples, together with lattice large-$N$ results, is presented as evidence that small supercooling may be a general property of strongly coupled gauge theories far from conformality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A testable extension would be to compute both $T_{\rm min}/T_c$ and $c_s^2(T_c)$ independently in a non-exponential superpotential that satisfies the slow-variation conditions; the paper's logic predicts that the two determinations satisfy $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = c_s^2(T_c)/2$ at leading order.
If the identity survives beyond the leading $1/D$ approximation, the ratio $(c_s/c_{s,\rm CFT})^2$ becomes the natural control parameter for organizing corrections to the transition thermodynamics, much as slow-roll parameters organize inflationary predictions.
For cosmological hidden sectors, the relation implies that strongly coupled theories far from conformality reheat almost immediately to the critical temperature, which would weaken the gravitational-wave signal expected from such confinement transitions compared with estimates that allow large supercooling.
The analogy with slow-roll parameters suggests that the minimal-temperature conditions define a surface in superpotential space; scanning superpotentials on this surface would map out the allowed region where the formula is valid and where it breaks down.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing to know: this paper derives, at leading order in a 1/D expansion, a relation between maximum supercooling and sound speed in Einstein-scalar holographic models away from conformality, and it gives an explicit analytic black brane solution in that regime. The result is genuinely new: nobody had connected epsilon_sc to c_s^2(T_c)/2 before, and the derivation is clean and internally consistent. The paper is worth taking seriously.

What it does well: the 1/D machinery is applied carefully. The black brane localization is standard in spirit but the authors go beyond the pure AdS case to a large class of superpotentials, and the leading-order matching is correct. The relation epsilon_sc = c_s^2(T_c)/2 follows from a short chain of steps: minimal temperature from the superpotential conditions (3.13), free energy localized near phi_min (3.19), and the sound speed expansion (3.23). The comparison with the exponential superpotential family in Sec. 4 shows real numerical agreement, and the caveat that the approximation fails near conformality is stated honestly. The paper also correctly flags that the sound speed at a first-order transition is formally ill-defined; it treats c_s as the smooth continuation, which is the right thing to do.

Soft spots, in order of importance:

1. The localization assumption in Appendix B is the load-bearing step and it is not proven. Equation (B.9) is exponentially suppressed only if the IR warp factor decays at least linearly and dT/dphi does not grow exponentially. The authors call these 'very mild conditions' and explicitly assume away extra extrema of T(phi), but they do not derive these conditions from the slow-roll conditions (3.1)-(3.2) or from the Gubser criterion used for the examples. The exponential superpotential W = 1 + e^{gamma phi}, which is the only numerical test in Sec. 4, has linear A(phi) at large phi, so it cannot probe this assumption. A superpotential like W ~ e^{a phi^2} would give A ~ -const * log phi, making c = 0 and the bound useless. This is a real gap, but it is also addressable: the authors could either prove the conditions for a general class of good singularities or find a counterexample. The central relation should be stated as conditional on this IR behavior.

2. The N=4 SYM comparison is a stretch. The paper correctly notes that on a sphere there is no standard sound speed, so it defines c_s via dlog T / dlog s. That is fine as an analogy, but calling it 'striking agreement' with (4.4) is generous—it is a match of a specific functional form, not a universal check. This is a minor overstatement, not a fatal one.

3. The numerics in Sec. 4 lack code and error bars. The reader can reproduce the qualitative agreement from the figure, but a published claim of this strength should have a reproducible script or at least a statement of the numerical method and accuracy. The acknowledgment that one figure was generated by ChatGPT is amusing but not a substitute for reproducibility.

4. The lattice comparison is brief and indirect; the paper uses a lattice sound speed from SU(3) YM to suggest sub-percent supercooling. This is suggestive but not a check of the relation itself.

On the citation pattern: the self-citations [69,70] are used as confirmatory examples of small supercooling in large-N YM. That is appropriate because those papers are directly on point. No sign of citation padding.

Who this is for: anyone working on holographic models of confinement, cosmological phase transitions, or gravitational wave phenomenology from strongly coupled sectors. It gives a simple, testable relation that can be checked on the lattice and in other holographic models.

Reader's verdict: the reader said CONDITIONAL, and I agree. The central derivation holds up under the stated assumptions; the assumptions are not fully justified, but they are plausible and the failure mode is explicit. The paper deserves a serious referee. It should not be desk-rejected.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the thermal confinement/deconfinement transition in Einstein-scalar holography by generalising the bulk to D+1 dimensions and working at leading order in the 1/D expansion. It constructs the black brane solution analytically in a boundary-layer approximation, derives the Hawking temperature as a function of the horizon scalar value, and computes the critical temperature by comparing free energies of the black brane and thermal dAdS geometries. The central claim is that the maximum possible supercooling, epsilon_sc = 1 - T_min/T_c, satisfies epsilon_sc = c_s^2(T_c)/2 at leading order, with epsilon_sc generically suppressed as 1/D^2 and independent of the detailed form of the scalar potential. The claim is checked against numerical solutions for the exponential superpotential W = 1 + e^{gamma phi}, against published improved-holography results, and against N=4 super Yang-Mills on a sphere.

Significance. If the central relation holds, it is a striking and potentially universal statement: the maximal supercooling of the deconfined phase is fixed by the thermodynamic speed of sound at T_c rather than by detailed features of the scalar potential. The paper's analytic construction of the localised black brane in the 1/D expansion is a useful technical contribution, and the numerical check in Section 4 for the exponential superpotential is a genuine, if model-specific, independent test. The result is also falsifiable: a counterexample in the stated class with epsilon_sc different from c_s^2(T_c)/2 at leading order would refute it. However, the universality claim is currently conditional on deep-IR assumptions that are stated but not proven, so the advertised breadth of the result goes somewhat beyond what is demonstrated.

major comments (2)

[Appendix B, Eqs. (B.8)-(B.9)] The derivation of Eq. (3.19), and hence of Eqs. (3.22) and (3.24), relies on the bound |I2| <= e^{(D-1)A(phi_min)} e^{-(D-1)(phi_star-phi_min)/sqrt(2D)} (1/((D-1)c)) |dT/dphi(phi_0)|. This bound is exponentially small only if c = inf_{phi>phi_star}|dA/dphi| is not exponentially small and |dT/dphi(phi_0)| does not grow exponentially. These conditions are not derived from the slow-roll conditions (3.1)-(3.2) or from the Gubser criterion used in Section 4; the text asserts them as 'very mild conditions on the IR asymptotics' without proof. They can fail for plausible potentials, for example W ~ exp(a phi^2), which gives A ~ -const*log(phi) and hence c=0, and T(phi) can develop additional extrema in the deep IR. Because all numerical checks in Section 4 use W = 1 + e^{gamma phi}, for which A is asymptotically linear, the examples do not probe this assumption. Without a proof, or an explicit restriction of the theorem to potentials satisfying these IR conditions, Eq. (3.19) and the universal relation epsilon_sc = c_s^2(T_c)/2 are not established.
[Section 3.2 and Appendix B] The free-energy comparison assumes a two-branch structure with a unique minimum of T(phi_h) and no additional extrema of T in the deep IR; the text explicitly says 'we assume a minimal case in which such a situation is excluded'. This branch structure is an input to the calculation, not a consequence of the 1/D expansion. If a thermodynamically stable small-black-brane branch exists, or if T(phi_h) has extra extrema, the identification of T_min and the derivation of Eq. (3.21) break down. Please state these assumptions as part of the theorem and verify them explicitly in the examples used for comparison.

minor comments (4)

[Section 3.3, after Eq. (3.23)] The sentence 'the ratio delta/D can be replaced by c_s^2(T_c)/c_s,CFT^2' is off by a factor of 2 relative to the preceding definitions: from Eq. (3.23), c_s^2/c_s,CFT^2 = 2 delta (D-1)/D^2, so delta/D = (1/2) c_s^2/c_s,CFT^2 + O(1/D). The final relation (3.24) is unaffected, but this sentence should be corrected.
[Section 3.3, footnote 3] The footnote correctly notes that the sound speed at a first-order transition is formally ill-defined. Please state more explicitly that the relation applies to the smooth continuation of the deconfined-phase equation of state, and define how far below T_c this continuation is being used; as written, a reader may interpret c_s^2(T_c) as the physical sound speed in the mixed-phase region.
[Section 4, Fig. 4] No numerical details or error estimates are given for the black brane solutions shown in Fig. 4. A brief description of the numerical method, grid resolution, convergence with D, and estimated uncertainties would make the comparison quantitative. The note about ChatGPT in the caption is out of place in a scientific paper.
[Abstract and Section 4, Eq. (4.4)] The claim of agreement with N=4 SYM should be framed as a consistency check rather than as an independent test of the 1/D expansion, because Eq. (4.4) follows from the same thermodynamic definitions c_s^2 = dlogT/dlogs and T_min/T_c. Relatedly, the abstract's phrase 'independent of the details of the scalar potential' overstates the scope; the result depends on the existence of a minimum of T(phi_h) and on the IR localization assumptions. A phrasing such as 'independent of the form of the potential within the stated class' would be more accurate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the 1/D supercooling relation is derived from the same T(φ), s(φ) functions with the superpotential parameter δ cancelling; self-citations are confirmatory only.

full rationale

The central prediction ε_sc = c_s^2(T_c)/2 is derived, not fitted. The paper introduces a superpotential parameter δ through the minimal-temperature conditions (3.13); ε_sc is then computed from the Taylor expansion of T(φ) around φ_min giving δ/D^2 (Eqs. 3.20–3.22), while c_s^2(T_c) is independently computed from d log T/d log s using the same quadratic expansion, also giving 2δ/D^2 (Eq. 3.23). The parameter δ cancels in the ratio, so the relation is not a restatement of an input datum. No free parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted. The self-citations [69,70] appear only as supporting remarks about 1/D^2 scaling in N=4 SYM and about lattice hints for small supercooling; they are not used to derive Eq. (3.24). The explicit numerical check with the exponential superpotential W = (1+e^{γφ})/L, the comparison with improved holography [79,80], and the N=4 SYM calculation are independent of the paper's central derivation. The main caveat is a genuine validity assumption, not circularity: Appendix B (Eqs. B.2–B.9) assumes monotonic IR behavior with a finite nonzero slope c and no extra extrema of T(φ), calling these 'very mild conditions on the IR asymptotics', and explicitly says 'we assume a minimal case'. If that deep-IR localization assumption fails, Eq. (3.19) and the universal relation would not follow. This is an unproven hypothesis about the IR geometry, and it is not derived from the target result, so it is a correctness risk rather than a circular step. The unusual inserted footnote about ChatGPT is not used in the derivation and does not affect circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is not data-fitting: W(phi) is the model input, D is the dimensionality, and delta parametrizes the superpotential curvature at T_min but cancels from the final relation. The load-bearing content is therefore the stated approximations and the IR asymptotic conditions, which are assumptions rather than fitted constants.

free parameters (1)

delta
Parameter defined by W''/W = (1+delta)/(2D) at the minimal temperature. It is not fitted to data; it labels the curvature of the superpotential and drops out of the final relation epsilon_sc = c_s^2/2. The regime of validity is 1/D << delta << D.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The (D+1)-dimensional Einstein-scalar action (2.1) is a valid holographic dual for the class of 4D confining gauge theories considered.
The holographic dictionary is assumed; the paper's universality claim is about this class of models.
standard math The scalar potential can be written in terms of a single superpotential W via V = 2(D-1)^2(W')^2 - D W^2/(2(D-1)), with the vacuum flow equations (2.7).
Known result for a single scalar in asymptotically AdS space [50-53,75,76]; the paper relies on it to determine the background.
domain assumption The slow-roll conditions (3.1) and (3.2) hold in the region that controls the transition, i.e., the dual theory is far from conformality at T_c.
This defines the regime of validity; the paper explicitly excludes near-conformal theories.
domain assumption The IR behavior satisfies the mild conditions of Appendix B: A(phi_h) decreases monotonically to -infinity with finite nonzero asymptotic slope and T(phi_h) has no additional extrema, so the free-energy integral is exponentially suppressed away from phi_min.
Appendix B, Eqs. (B.2) to (B.9); these conditions are needed for the localization of the free-energy integral and are not proven in full generality.
standard math The large-D boundary-layer matching gives the leading-order black brane solution (3.9).
Standard large-D method [55-59]; the matching procedure is not proven to all orders but is a standard technique.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Localised Horizons and Holographic Thermodynamics: Supercooling in the 1/D Expansion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/STZ3YDBZ

@misc{pith2026260813557,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Localised Horizons and Holographic Thermodynamics: Supercooling in the 1/D Expansion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/STZ3YDBZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.13557}
}

abstract

In holography, four-dimensional confining gauge theories are often modelled by five-dimensional Einstein--scalar gravity by choosing a specific form of the scalar potential. In a large class of non-conformal theories, we show that a predictive structure emerges for the thermal confinement transition by generalising the gravitational dual to $D+1$ dimensions and using a $1/D$ expansion. These results are independent of the details of the scalar potential, hinting towards universality. The black brane geometry dual to the deconfined phase can be analytically constructed due to its effects being localised near the horizon at leading order. The solution does not exist below a minimal temperature $T_{\rm min}$ and the maximum possible supercooling in the transition $\epsilon_{\rm sc} = 1-T_{\rm min}/T_{\rm c}$ is generically suppressed by a factor of $1/D^2$. Remarkably, the maximum supercooling at the leading order is set by the speed of sound in the deconfined phase of the gauge theory at the critical temperature, $\epsilon_{\rm sc}=c_s^2(T_{\rm c})/2$. These predictions agree with explicit calculations in an exponential superpotential, improved holography, and the thermal transition in $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang--Mills on a sphere.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[1]

Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,Phys

A.M. Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,Phys. Lett. B72 (1978) 477

1978
[2]

McLerran and B

L.D. McLerran and B. Svetitsky,Quark Liberation at High Temperature: A Monte Carlo Study of SU(2) Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 450

work page 1981
[3]

J. Kuti, J. Polónyi and K. Szlachányi,Monte Carlo study of SU (2) gauge theory at finite temperature,AIP Conf. Proc.68(1980) 906

work page 1980
[4]

Yaffe and B

L.G. Yaffe and B. Svetitsky,First Order Phase Transition in the SU(3) Gauge Theory at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D26(1982) 963

1982
[5]

Lucini, M

B. Lucini, M. Teper and U. Wenger,The Deconfinement transition in SU(N) gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B545(2002) 197 [hep-lat/0206029]

arXiv 2002
[6]

Lucini, M

B. Lucini, M. Teper and U. Wenger,The High temperature phase transition in SU(N) gauge theories,JHEP01(2004) 061 [hep-lat/0307017]

arXiv 2004
[7]

Crean, J

X. Crean, J. Giansiracusa and B. Lucini,Simplicity of confinement in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,2602.10088

work page arXiv
[8]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B426(1994) 19 [hep-th/9407087]

arXiv 1994

Show all 81 references

[9]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,Nucl. Phys. B431(1994) 484 [hep-th/9408099]

1994 arXiv
[10]

Douglas and S.H

M.R. Douglas and S.H. Shenker,Dynamics of SU(N) supersymmetric gauge theory,Nucl. Phys. B447(1995) 271 [hep-th/9503163]

1995 arXiv
[11]

Hanany, M.J

A. Hanany, M.J. Strassler and A. Zaffaroni,Confinement and strings in MQCD,Nucl. Phys. B513(1998) 87 [hep-th/9707244]. – 18 –

1998 arXiv
[12]

Davies, T.J

N.M. Davies, T.J. Hollowood and V.V. Khoze,Monopoles, affine algebras and the gluino condensate,J. Math. Phys.44(2003) 3640 [hep-th/0006011]

2003 arXiv
[13]

Aharony, J

O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk,The Hagedorn - deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.8(2004) 603 [hep-th/0310285]

2004 arXiv
[14]

Poppitz, T

E. Poppitz, T. Schäfer and M. Unsal,Continuity, Deconfinement, and (Super) Yang-Mills Theory,JHEP10(2012) 115 [1205.0290]

2012 arXiv
[15]

Poppitz, T

E. Poppitz, T. Schäfer and M. Ünsal,Universal mechanism of (semi-classical) deconfinement and theta-dependence for all simple groups,JHEP03(2013) 087 [1212.1238]

2013 arXiv
[16]

Anber and V

M.M. Anber and V. Pellizzani,Representation dependence of k -strings in pure Yang-Mills theory via supersymmetry,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 114015 [1710.06509]

2017 arXiv
[17]

Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv

E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space, thermal phase transition, and confinement in gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 505 [hep-th/9803131]

1998 arXiv
[18]

Gubser,Dilaton driven confinement,hep-th/9902155

S.S. Gubser,Dilaton driven confinement,hep-th/9902155

arXiv
[19]

Klebanov and A.A

I.R. Klebanov and A.A. Tseytlin,Gravity duals of supersymmetric SU(N) x SU(N+M) gauge theories,Nucl. Phys. B578(2000) 123 [hep-th/0002159]

2000 arXiv
[20]

Klebanov and M.J

I.R. Klebanov and M.J. Strassler,Supergravity and a confining gauge theory: Duality cascades and chi SB resolution of naked singularities,JHEP08(2000) 052 [hep-th/0007191]

2000 arXiv
[21]

Arkani-Hamed, M

N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati and L. Randall,Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08 (2001) 017 [hep-th/0012148]

2001 arXiv
[22]

Rattazzi and A

R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model,JHEP04(2001) 021 [hep-th/0012248]

2001 arXiv
[23]

Creminelli, A

P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi,Holography and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP03(2002) 051 [hep-th/0107141]

2002 arXiv
[24]

Karch, E

A. Karch, E. Katz, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,Linear confinement and AdS/QCD,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 015005 [hep-ph/0602229]

2006 arXiv
[25]

Randall and G

L. Randall and G. Servant,Gravitational waves from warped spacetime,JHEP05(2007) 054 [hep-ph/0607158]

2007 arXiv
[26]

Gursoy and E

U. Gursoy and E. Kiritsis,Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part I,JHEP 02(2008) 032 [0707.1324]

2008 arXiv
[27]

Gursoy, E

U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis and F. Nitti,Exploring improved holographic theories for QCD: Part II,JHEP02(2008) 019 [0707.1349]

2008 arXiv
[28]

Hassanain, J

B. Hassanain, J. March-Russell and M. Schvellinger,Warped Deformed Throats have Faster (Electroweak) Phase Transitions,JHEP10(2007) 089 [0708.2060]

2007 arXiv
[29]

Batell and T

B. Batell and T. Gherghetta,Dynamical Soft-Wall AdS/QCD,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 026002 [0801.4383]

2008 arXiv
[30]

Gubser and A

S.S. Gubser and A. Nellore,Mimicking the QCD equation of state with a dual black hole, Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 086007 [0804.0434]

2008 arXiv
[31]

Gursoy, E

U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti and F. Nitti,Holography and Thermodynamics of 5D Dilaton-gravity,JHEP05(2009) 033 [0812.0792]. – 19 –

2009 arXiv
[32]

Konstandin and G

T. Konstandin and G. Servant,Cosmological Consequences of Nearly Conformal Dynamics at the TeV scale,JCAP12(2011) 009 [1104.4791]

2011 arXiv
[33]

Agashe, P

K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar and R. Sundrum,Phase Transitions from the Fifth Dimension,JHEP02(2021) 051 [2010.04083]

2021 arXiv
[34]

Hanada and H

M. Hanada and H. Watanabe,Partial deconfinement: a brief overview,Eur. Phys. J. ST 232(2023) 333 [2210.11216]

2023 arXiv
[35]

Mishra and L

R.K. Mishra and L. Randall,Phase transition to RS: cool, not supercool,JHEP06(2024) 099 [2401.09633]

2024 arXiv
[36]

Asadi, A

P. Asadi, A. Batz and G.D. Kribs,Rich Phenomenology from Simple Ingredients: A Review of Confining Dark Sectors,2606.30760

arXiv
[37]

Kaplan and H

D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi,SU(2) x U(1) Breaking by Vacuum Misalignment,Phys. Lett. B 136(1984) 183

1984
[38]

Georgi and D.B

H. Georgi and D.B. Kaplan,Composite Higgs and Custodial SU(2),Phys. Lett. B145(1984) 216

1984
[39]

Kaplan,Flavor at SSC energies: A New mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,Nucl

D.B. Kaplan,Flavor at SSC energies: A New mechanism for dynamically generated fermion masses,Nucl. Phys. B365(1991) 259

1991
[40]

Contino, Y

R. Contino, Y. Nomura and A. Pomarol,Higgs as a Holographic Pseudo Goldstone Boson, Nucl. Phys. B671(2003) 148 [hep-ph/0306259]

2003 arXiv
[41]

Agashe, R

K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol,The Minimal composite Higgs model,Nucl. Phys. B 719(2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089]

2005 arXiv
[42]

Arkani-Hamed, A.G

N. Arkani-Hamed, A.G. Cohen and H. Georgi,Electroweak symmetry breaking from dimensional deconstruction,Phys. Lett. B513(2001) 232 [hep-ph/0105239]

2001 arXiv
[43]

Chacko, H.-S

Z. Chacko, H.-S. Goh and R. Harnik,The Twin Higgs: Natural electroweak breaking from mirror symmetry,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 231802 [hep-ph/0506256]

2006 arXiv
[44]

Kribs and E.T

G.D. Kribs and E.T. Neil,Review of strongly-coupled composite dark matter models and lattice simulations,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A31(2016) 1643004 [1604.04627]

2016 arXiv
[45]

Hawking and D.N

S.W. Hawking and D.N. Page,Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space, Commun. Math. Phys.87(1983) 577

1983
[46]

Randall and R

L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221]

1999 arXiv
[47]

Goldberger and M.B

W.D. Goldberger and M.B. Wise,Modulus stabilization with bulk fields,Phys. Rev. Lett.83 (1999) 4922 [hep-ph/9907447]

1999 arXiv
[48]

Baratella, A

P. Baratella, A. Pomarol and F. Rompineve,The Supercooled Universe,JHEP03(2019) 100 [1812.06996]

2019 arXiv
[49]

Agashe, P

K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar and R. Sundrum,Cosmological Phase Transition of Spontaneous Confinement,JHEP05(2020) 086 [1910.06238]

2020 arXiv
[50]

Behrndt and M

K. Behrndt and M. Cvetic,Supersymmetric domain wall world from D = 5 simple gauged supergravity,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 253 [hep-th/9909058]

2000 arXiv
[51]

Skenderis and P.K

K. Skenderis and P.K. Townsend,Gravitational stability and renormalization group flow, Phys. Lett. B468(1999) 46 [hep-th/9909070]. – 20 –

1999 arXiv
[52]

Hatanaka, M

H. Hatanaka, M. Sakamoto, M. Tachibana and K. Takenaga,Many brane extension of the Randall-Sundrum solution,Prog. Theor. Phys.102(1999) 1213 [hep-th/9909076]

1999 arXiv
[53]

DeWolfe, D.Z

O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman, S.S. Gubser and A. Karch,Modeling the fifth-dimension with scalars and gravity,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 046008 [hep-th/9909134]

2000 arXiv
[54]

Dhumuntarao, J.I

A. Dhumuntarao, J.I. Kapusta and C. Plumberg,Randall-Sundrum Model with a Dilaton Field at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 066023 [2001.00038]

2020 arXiv
[55]

Emparan, R

R. Emparan, R. Suzuki and K. Tanabe,The large D limit of General Relativity,JHEP06 (2013) 009 [1302.6382]

2013 arXiv
[56]

Emparan, T

R. Emparan, T. Shiromizu, R. Suzuki, K. Tanabe and T. Tanaka,Effective theory of Black Holes in the 1/D expansion,JHEP06(2015) 159 [1504.06489]

2015 arXiv
[57]

Herzog and Y

C.P. Herzog and Y. Kim,The Large Dimension Limit of a Small Black Hole Instability in Anti-de Sitter Space,JHEP02(2018) 167 [1711.04865]

2018 arXiv
[58]

Emparan, J

R. Emparan, J. Rafecas-Ventosa and B. Way,General effective theories of black holes in the large D limit,JHEP04(2026) 034 [2512.14186]

2026
[59]

Emparan and C.P

R. Emparan and C.P. Herzog,Large D limit of Einstein’s equations,Rev. Mod. Phys.92 (2020) 045005 [2003.11394]

2020 arXiv
[60]

Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases,Phys

E. Witten,Cosmic Separation of Phases,Phys. Rev. D30(1984) 272

1984
[61]

Garcia Garcia, R

I. Garcia Garcia, R. Lasenby and J. March-Russell,Twin Higgs WIMP Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 055034 [1505.07109]

2015 arXiv
[62]

Gouttenoire, E

Y. Gouttenoire, E. Kuflik and D. Liu,Heavy baryon dark matter from SU(N) confinement: Bubble wall velocity and boundary effects,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 035002 [2311.00029]

2024 arXiv
[63]

Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

C. Caprini et al.,Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update,JCAP03(2020) 024 [1910.13125]

2020 arXiv
[64]

Pasechnik, M

R. Pasechnik, M. Reichert, F. Sannino and Z.-W. Wang,Gravitational waves from composite dark sectors,JHEP02(2024) 159 [2309.16755]

2024 arXiv
[65]

Huber, R

S. Huber, R. Phipps and M. Reichert,Gravitational Waves from Confinement inSU(N) Yang-Mills Theory,2512.14530

arXiv
[66]

Miura, H

K. Miura, H. Ohki, S. Otani and K. Yamawaki,Gravitational Waves from Walking Technicolor,JHEP10(2019) 194 [1811.05670]

2019 arXiv
[67]

Azatov and M

A. Azatov and M. Vanvlasselaer,Phase transitions in perturbative walking dynamics,JHEP 09(2020) 085 [2003.10265]

2020 arXiv
[68]

Fujikura, S

K. Fujikura, S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai, P. Sun and Y. Zhang,Conformal phase transition in supersymmetric QCD,JHEP07(2025) 215 [2503.22293]

2025 arXiv
[69]

Agrawal, G.R

P. Agrawal, G.R. Kane, V. Loladze and M. Reig,Supercooled confinement,JHEP10(2025) 066 [2504.00199]

2025
[70]

Agrawal, G.R

P. Agrawal, G.R. Kane, V. Loladze and J. March-Russell,Prediction for Maximum Supercooling in SU(N) Confinement Transition,Phys. Rev. Lett.136(2026) 041902 [2508.10091]

2026
[71]

Ismail and L.-T

A. Ismail and L.-T. Wang,Uncool soft-wall transitions and gravitational waves,2604.06306

arXiv
[72]

Buchel,Hydrodynamics of the cascading plasma,Nucl

A. Buchel,Hydrodynamics of the cascading plasma,Nucl. Phys. B820(2009) 385 [0903.3605]. – 21 –

2009 arXiv
[73]

Morgante, N

E. Morgante, N. Ramberg and P. Schwaller,Gravitational waves from dark SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 036010 [2210.11821]

2023 arXiv
[74]

Bardeen, B

J.M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S.W. Hawking,The Four laws of black hole mechanics, Commun. Math. Phys.31(1973) 161

1973
[75]

Townsend,Positive Energy and the Scalar Potential in Higher Dimensional (Super)gravity Theories,Phys

P.K. Townsend,Positive Energy and the Scalar Potential in Higher Dimensional (Super)gravity Theories,Phys. Lett. B148(1984) 55

1984
[76]

Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class

K. Skenderis,Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 5849 [hep-th/0209067]

2002 arXiv
[77]

Chamblin and H.S

H.A. Chamblin and H.S. Reall,Dynamic dilatonic domain walls,Nucl. Phys. B562(1999) 133 [hep-th/9903225]

1999 arXiv
[78]

Gubser,Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad, and the naked,Adv

S.S. Gubser,Curvature singularities: The Good, the bad, and the naked,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4(2000) 679 [hep-th/0002160]

2000 arXiv
[79]

Gursoy, E

U. Gursoy, E. Kiritsis, L. Mazzanti, G. Michalogiorgakis and F. Nitti,Improved Holographic QCD,Lect. Notes Phys.828(2011) 79 [1006.5461]

2011 arXiv
[80]

Missoni, E

B. Missoni, E. Morgante and N. Ramberg,Domain Walls From Confining Bubbles:SU(Nc) Yang Mills at Finiteθ,2607.18800

arXiv
[81]

Giusti, M

L. Giusti, M. Hirasawa, M. Pepe and L. Virzì,A precise study of the thermodynamic properties of the SU(3) Yang-Mills theory across the deconfinement transition,Phys. Lett. B 868(2025) 139775 [2501.10284]. – 22 –

2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,Phys

A.M. Polyakov,Thermal Properties of Gauge Fields and Quark Liberation,Phys. Lett. B72 (1978) 477

1978

[2] [2]

McLerran and B

L.D. McLerran and B. Svetitsky,Quark Liberation at High Temperature: A Monte Carlo Study of SU(2) Gauge Theory,Phys. Rev. D24(1981) 450

work page 1981

[3] [3]

J. Kuti, J. Polónyi and K. Szlachányi,Monte Carlo study of SU (2) gauge theory at finite temperature,AIP Conf. Proc.68(1980) 906

work page 1980

[4] [4]

Yaffe and B

L.G. Yaffe and B. Svetitsky,First Order Phase Transition in the SU(3) Gauge Theory at Finite Temperature,Phys. Rev. D26(1982) 963

1982

[5] [5]

Lucini, M

B. Lucini, M. Teper and U. Wenger,The Deconfinement transition in SU(N) gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B545(2002) 197 [hep-lat/0206029]

arXiv 2002

[6] [6]

Lucini, M

B. Lucini, M. Teper and U. Wenger,The High temperature phase transition in SU(N) gauge theories,JHEP01(2004) 061 [hep-lat/0307017]

arXiv 2004

[7] [7]

Crean, J

X. Crean, J. Giansiracusa and B. Lucini,Simplicity of confinement in SU(3) Yang-Mills theory,2602.10088

work page arXiv

[8] [8]

Seiberg and E

N. Seiberg and E. Witten,Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory,Nucl. Phys. B426(1994) 19 [hep-th/9407087]

arXiv 1994