The Geometry of Gravitational Radiation

Jelle Hartong

REVIEW

The Geometry of Gravitational Radiation

Jelle Hartong

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 9 Sep 2026 · 45 references

Pith's verdict: The K-curvature machinery and the covariant vacuum shear expression are genuinely new and well-built, but the paper leans heavily on unpublished work by the same group and postpones a variational derivation of the new boundary energy-momentum tensor.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on September 10, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2609.09954 (version 1)

Pith IDAJEQ2N33, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationJelle Hartong. "The Geometry of Gravitational Radiation." arXiv:2609.09954 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AJEQ2N33

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This is a solid piece of work. The core idea—gauging the conformal Carroll algebra to organize the near-boundary expansion and define K-curvatures—is genuinely new, and the resulting Carroll-covariant expression for vacuum shear (5.49) is a clean resolution of a long-standing split problem. The rewriting of the Bondi loss equations in terms of a traceless energy-momentum tensor with vanishing energy flux (section 6.2) is also a nice conceptual step. The classification of spacetimes by K-curvature hierarchy (vacuum → radiative) is a natural organizing principle.

The paper does its homework: derivations are detailed, appendices are thorough, and the connection to Weyl tensor components is explicit. It is clearly written by someone who knows the asymptotic-symmetries literature well.

The main soft spot is that the entire near-boundary expansion and gauge choices are taken from references [12,13] by the same author and collaborators, which are not yet peer-reviewed. That creates a chain of dependency that a referee will want to verify. The new energy-momentum tensor T' is obtained by rewriting the Bondi loss equations, not from a variational principle; the author states that a variational derivation is work in progress [19]. That’s a limitation, though it doesn’t invalidate the results here—it just means the interpretation is provisional.

The stress-test concern about absorbing Y_{μν} into F does not hold up. Appendix D.6 solves the PDEs explicitly and shows that Y can be absorbed into the supertranslation field via a redefinition of the scalar F. The text on p.35 is concise but the derivation is there. So that worry is not a real problem.

Who is this for? Researchers in asymptotic symmetries, flat space holography, and Carrollian field theory. It builds on a fairly technical literature, so it’s not for beginners.

Verdict: deserves a serious referee. The paper is important enough, and the formalism is sharp enough, to merit careful review despite the dependency on unpublished work.

Referee report

Significance

If correct, the paper provides a boundary-covariant split of the shear into vacuum (soft) and radiative (hard) parts, and a reformulation of the flux-balance laws in which the K-curvatures act as sources. The work is technically very detailed: the appendices contain explicit computations, the hierarchy of spacetime types in (3.133)–(4.27) is concrete, and the relation to Newman–Penrose scalars and the Geroch tensor gives a useful dictionary. The paper is also honest about the open status of the variational interpretation of T′. I explicitly examined the stress-test concern about the absorption of Yμν into F in Eq. (5.38): it does not land. Equation (5.38) is linear in f and Y with exactly matching coefficients (−Dρ∂σf − 2∂ρφ∂σf + ½fTρσ versus ½Dρ∂σY + ∂ρφ∂σY − ¼TρσY), so the redefinition f → f − Y/2 absorbs Y without residue and preserves the condition on F; the absorption claim is therefore sound.

Major objections (3)

[§5.2, Eq. (5.49) and Summary after (5.24)] The claim that the vacuum shear is parametrized by two boundary scalar fields F and Φ, and the converse statement that vanishing K-curvatures imply Cμν = Cvacμν up to absorbed integration data, are established only locally. Appendix D.6 constructs the most general Tμν and Yμν as functions on the target space Xa, and the Stückelberg argument (5.40)–(5.48) fixes Tρσ via the Schwarzian derivative of f, but the paper does not show that on a general boundary (for example S2) this construction covers every solution of the D.6 PDEs, nor that ζ and Φ are globally single-valued. Since the fourfold classification of §3.7 and the central statement that the K-curvatures encode all deviation from vacuum shear depend on this completeness, the text should either provide a global argument or explicitly state that the parametrization and the 'if and only if' are local statements.
[§6.2, Eqs. (6.19)–(6.24)] The new energy-momentum tensor T′ is introduced by a rewriting of the Bondi loss equations in Appendix F, not as the response to boundary variations; the variational interpretation is explicitly deferred to work in progress [19]. The rewriting itself is a mathematical equivalence, and the definitions (6.21)–(6.27) are clear, but the physical claims attached to T′—that it is an 'ordinary Carroll theory' energy-momentum tensor, that the BMS currents are 'most readily defined' with it, and that it corresponds to the 'good prescription'—are conjectural. These claims appear in the abstract and in the main text of §6.2 without the caveat being carried through; the manuscript should mark this interpretation explicitly as conjectural pending [19].
[§2.4 and §6.1] The near-boundary expansion in (2.49)–(2.58), the energy-momentum-news complex, and its Ward identities (6.5)–(6.17) are quoted from the unpublished preprints [12,13] rather than derived in the present paper. These results are load-bearing for the K-curvature expressions (3.143)–(3.147), for the vacuum-shear construction, and for Appendix F. Because [12,13] are not yet peer-reviewed, the referee cannot verify a substantial part of the logical chain from the Einstein equations to the final claims. The manuscript should either include a condensed derivation of the quoted expansion and Ward identities, or state precisely which equations are imported from [12,13] and which parts of the argument are new.

Minor objections (4)

[§4.1, Eq. (4.8c)] The line 'Uµ = rbµ + (0) Uµ + Or−1).' contains a typo: it should read O(r−1).
[Footnote 11] The quantity Tij used in footnote 11 to compare with Eq. (4.64) is not the same object as the tensor Tμν of Section 5.1 and Appendix D.6; the notation should be distinguished or the identification should be explained.
[§3.7, Eq. (3.133)] The phrase 'gauge invariant K-curvature constraints' is imprecise: the listed conditions are Weyl-covariant conditions that form a hierarchy under Carroll boosts via (3.129)–(3.131), but they are not invariant in the usual sense. A short clarifying remark would help the reader.
[Note added] The statement that the preprint [22] 'has some overlap' does not specify which sections or results overlap; a sentence identifying the overlap would be useful for readers comparing the two works.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Gauging the conformal Carroll algebra at future null infinity organizes the near-boundary data of asymptotically flat spacetimes so that one set of curvatures, the K-curvatures, vanishes exactly when the shear is vacuum shear, and this…

The reading

The paper tries to show that the old split of gravitational shear at future null infinity into vacuum (soft) and radiative (hard) parts can be made fully covariant using Carroll geometry. The author gauges the conformal Carroll algebra, the symmetry algebra of a conformal Carroll manifold, which is what future null infinity is, and finds that after all curvature constraints are imposed the only surviving curvatures are the K-curvatures. The central claim is that the K-curvatures vanish if and only if the shear equals the vacuum shear, and that every other case is classified by how the K-curvatures transform under Carroll boosts: vacuum, strongly non-radiative, weakly non-radiative, or radiative. The K-curvatures also account for five of the ten leading Weyl tensor components, one of them being the recently found Carroll boost anomaly. Finally, the paper rewrites the Bondi loss equations as non-conservation equations for a traceless boundary energy-momentum tensor with vanishing energy flux, with all flux terms expressed through the K-curvatures; a reader would care because this gives a boundary-covariant handle on what radiation is and on where BMS charges come from.

What carries the argument

The K-curvatures are the field strengths associated with the special conformal generators $K$ and $K_a$ in the gauging of the conformal Carroll algebra, the only curvatures left after the constraints $R(H)=0$, $R(P)=0$, $R(B)=0$, $R(J)=0$ (and hence $R(D)=0$) are imposed. They carry the argument because their vanishing is equivalent to the shear being vacuum shear, and because their hierarchical transformation under Carroll boosts produces the fourfold classification of spacetimes. The second load-bearing object is the vacuum shear formula $C^{\text{vac}}_{\mu\nu}=2h^{\rho}_{\langle\mu}h^{\sigma}_{\nu\rangle}\bigl(-D_\rho\partial_\sigma F+F(D_\rho\partial_\sigma\Phi+\partial_\rho\Phi\,\partial_\sigma\Phi)\bigr)$, expressed in terms of two Carroll scalar fields $\Phi$ and $F$ with $(\mathcal{L}_v+\tfrac12K)F=-1$; this expression makes the split $C_{\mu\nu}-C^{\text{vac}}_{\mu\nu}$ Carroll-boost invariant. The rewriting of the Bondi loss equations is carried by a primed energy-momentum tensor that is traceless and has vanishing energy flux, with the non-conservation flux written entirely in terms of K-curvatures.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's discovery is a geometrization of gravitational radiation near future null infinity. After gauging the conformal Carroll algebra and imposing the curvature constraints that identify the connections with the boundary Carroll metric data and the shear, the only non-vanishing curvatures are $R(K)_{\mu\nu}$ and $R(K)_{\mu\nu}{}^a$, the K-curvatures. These vanish precisely for vacuum (soft) shear, so the gauge-invariant difference $C_{\mu\nu}-C^{\text{vac}}_{\mu\nu}$ measures the radiative content; the vacuum shear itself has an explicit Carroll-covariant form built from two boundary scalar fields $\Phi$ and $F$, with $F$ obeying $(\mathcal{L}_v+\tfrac12 K)F=-1$ and $\Phi$ encoding the conformal (superboost/Liouville) ambiguity. Under Carroll boosts the K-curvatures form the hierarchy $R(K)_{ab}\to v^\mu R(K)_{\mu a}\to v^\mu R(K)_{\mu ab}$, which organizes spacetimes into vacuum, strongly and weakly non-radiative, and radiative types. Five of the ten Weyl components at leading order in $1/r$ are these curvatures, and $v^\mu R(K)_{\mu\nu}$ is exactly the Carroll boost anomaly of the on-shell action with boundary terms. In the last step the Bondi loss equations are rewritten as the non-conservation of a traceless Carroll energy-momentum tensor $T'$ with vanishing energy flux: the right-hand side is built from the K-curvatures, and contracting $T'$ with a Carroll conformal Killing vector gives the BMS currents whose non-conservation is likewise K-curvature flux.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on two premises: that the Carroll-covariant Bondi–Sachs gauge and near-boundary expansion borrowed from [12,13] really capture the asymptotically flat vacuum solution space, and that the rewritten equations (6.19)–(6.20) define a physically meaningful boundary energy-momentum tensor, the second being asserted without a variational derivation and explicitly flagged by the author as work in progress [19].

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the K-curvatures vanish exactly when the shear is vacuum shear, then the radiative shear $C_{\mu\nu}-C^{\text{vac}}_{\mu\nu}$ is a Carroll-boost-invariant tensor, giving a boundary-covariant definition of what counts as radiation.
The hierarchy of K-curvatures under Carroll boosts yields a gauge-invariant four-way classification of asymptotically flat spacetimes as vacuum, strongly non-radiative, weakly non-radiative, or radiative.
Since five K-curvature components are the leading $1/r$ parts of five Weyl components, corresponding to the Newman–Penrose scalars $\psi_4$, $\psi_3$, and part of $\psi_2$, the radiative content can be read directly off the boundary Carroll geometry.
The rewritten Bondi loss equations imply that the BMS currents are obtained by contracting the traceless Carroll energy-momentum tensor with a Carroll conformal Killing vector, and that their non-conservation is controlled by K-curvature fluxes.
One of the K-curvatures equals the Carroll boost anomaly, tying the anomalous Carroll boost symmetry of the on-shell action to a radiative flux term in the loss equations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the rewriting in section 6.2 is taken seriously as a definition, a natural next step the paper leaves open is to derive the primed energy-momentum tensor as the response to variations that hold $C-C^{\text{vac}}$ fixed; that variational derivation would decide whether the object is a genuine boundary energy-momentum tensor or only a convenient rewriting.
The two-scalar encoding $(\Phi,F)$ suggests that the vacuum or soft data of an asymptotically flat spacetime can be traded for the conformal geometry of the 2-sphere together with a supertranslation field, pointing toward a Carrollian treatment of soft-memory statements that the paper does not develop.
The K-curvature hierarchy may be useful for conserved charges: if the K-curvature fluxes vanish at the corners of future null infinity, the hierarchy defines nested classes of vacua with increasingly trivial boost data, which could supply balance laws across finite retarded-time intervals.
Because the new energy-momentum tensor is defined by a rewriting of the loss equations rather than by a variational principle, an independent check would be to reproduce the same flux terms from a different scheme, such as a canonical charge calculation in standard Bondi coordinates.

Original abstract

We consider 4-dimensional asymptotically flat vacuum spacetimes near future null infinity endowed with the most general allowable Carroll geometry. We show that the near-boundary radial expansion (to a certain order) can be organised in terms of connections that can be obtained by gauging the conformal Carroll algebra. The only non-vanishing curvatures in this gauging procedure are those that are associated with the special conformal generators and we will refer to these as the $K$-curvatures. The vanishing of these $K$-curvatures defines an asymptotic vacuum spacetime and we use this to construct a boundary (i.e. Carroll) covariant expression for the vacuum (soft) shear in terms of two boundary Carroll scalar fields. The $K$-curvatures transform in a hierarchical fashion into one another under Carroll boosts. This leads to a classification of 4 types of spacetimes: vacuum, strongly and weakly non-radiative, and radiative spacetimes. It is shown that the $K$-curvatures correspond to 5 of the 10 Weyl tensor components at leading order in their $1/r$ expansion. We furthermore observe that one of the $K$-curvatures is equal to the recently found Carroll boost anomaly. Finally, we show that the Bondi loss equations for the boundary energy-momentum-news complex can be cast into a form involving another energy-momentum tensor with vanishing energy flux that is traceless and whose non-conservation is entirely captured by the $K$-curvatures. The BMS currents can be obtained by contracting this latter energy-momentum tensor with a Carroll conformal Killing vector.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,751 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.16 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.69 · compares with prior results 0.31 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

We consider 4-dimensional asymptotically flat vacuum spacetimes near future null infinity endowed with the most general allowable Carroll geometry. We show that the near-boundary radial expansion (to a certain order) can be organised in terms of connections that can be obtained by gauging the conformal Carroll algebra. The only non-vanishing curvatures in this gauging procedure are those that are associated with the special conformal generators and we will refer to these as the $K$-curvatures. The vanishing of these $K$-curvatures defines an asymptotic vacuum spacetime and we use this to construct a boundary (i.e. Carroll) covariant expression for the vacuum (soft) shear in terms of two boundary Carroll scalar fields. The $K$-curvatures transform in a hierarchical fashion into one another under Carroll boosts. This leads to a classification of 4 types of spacetimes: vacuum, strongly and weakly non-radiative, and radiative spacetimes. It is shown that the $K$-curvatures correspond to 5 of the 10 Weyl tensor components at leading order in their $1/r$ expansion. We furthermore observe that one of the $K$-curvatures is equal to the recently found Carroll boost anomaly. Finally, we show that the Bondi loss equations for the boundary energy-momentum-news complex can be cast into a form involving another energy-momentum tensor with vanishing energy flux that is traceless and whose non-conservation is entirely captured by the $K$-curvatures. The BMS currents can be obtained by contracting this latter energy-momentum tensor with a Carroll conformal Killing vector.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	We consider 4-dimensional asymptotically flat vacuum spacetimes near future null infinity endowed with the most general allowable Carroll geometry.	background 0.67	0.54	0.03	asserted 0.65
s1	We show that the near-boundary radial expansion (to a certain order) can be organised in terms of connections that can be obtained by gauging the conformal Carroll algebra.	result 0.48	0.95	0.20	asserted 1.00
s2	The only non-vanishing curvatures in this gauging procedure are those that are associated with the special conformal generators and we will refer to these as the $K$-curvatures.	result 0.74	0.80	0.09	asserted 1.00
s3	The vanishing of these $K$-curvatures defines an asymptotic vacuum spacetime and we use this to construct a boundary (i.e. Carroll) covariant expression for the vacuum (soft) shear in terms of two boundary Carroll scalar fields.	result 0.53	0.94	0.30	asserted 1.00
s4	The $K$-curvatures transform in a hierarchical fashion into one another under Carroll boosts.	result 0.98	0.74	0.06	asserted 1.00
s5	This leads to a classification of 4 types of spacetimes: vacuum, strongly and weakly non-radiative, and radiative spacetimes.	result 0.95	0.85	0.18	asserted 1.00
s6	It is shown that the $K$-curvatures correspond to 5 of the 10 Weyl tensor components at leading order in their $1/r$ expansion.	result 1.00	0.86	0.11	asserted 1.00
s7	We furthermore observe that one of the $K$-curvatures is equal to the recently found Carroll boost anomaly.	result 0.98	0.72	0.07	asserted 1.00
s8	Finally, we show that the Bondi loss equations for the boundary energy-momentum-news complex can be cast into a form involving another energy-momentum tensor with vanishing energy flux that is traceless and whose non-conservation is entirely captured by the $K$-curvatures.	result 0.86	0.92	0.18	asserted 1.00
s9	The BMS currents can be obtained by contracting this latter energy-momentum tensor with a Carroll conformal Killing vector.	result 0.89	0.89	0.11	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

References

Works cited (45)

[19]

J. Hartong,work in progress,

View on Pith
[1]

H. Bondi, M. van der Burg and A. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond. A269(1962) 21–52

View on Pith 1962
[2]

R. Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond.A270(1962) 103–126

View on Pith 1962
[3]

R. Sachs,Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,Phys.Rev.128 (1962) 2851–2864

View on Pith 1962
[4]

E. Newman and R. Penrose,An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 566–578

View on Pith 1962
[5]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited,Phys.Rev.Lett.105(2010) 111103, [0909.2617]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[6]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP1005(2010) 062, [1001.1541]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[7]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,BMS charge algebra,JHEP12(2011) 105, [1106.0213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[8]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Supertranslations call for superrotations,PoS CNCFG2010(2010) 010, [1102.4632]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010
[9]

C. Duval, G. Gibbons and P. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups,J.Phys. A47(2014) 335204, [1403.4213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[10]

C. Duval, G. Gibbons and P. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,Class.Quant.Grav.31(2014) 092001, [1402.5894]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[11]

J. Hartong,Holographic Reconstruction of 3D Flat Space-Time,JHEP10 (2016) 104, [1511.01387]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[12]

J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,Boundary Energy-Momentum Tensors for Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,2505.05432

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[13]

J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,The Energy-Momentum-News Complex near Future Null Infinity,2607.07872

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[14]

A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. Marios Petropoulos and M. Vilatte, Carrollian-Holographic Derivation of Gravitational Flux-Balance Laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 261602, [2505.00077]

View on Pith arXiv 2025
[15]

J. Hartong,Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity, JHEP08(2015) 069, [1505.05011]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015
[16]

R. Geroch,Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, inSymposium on Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, 1977, DOI. 74

View on Pith 1977
[17]

A. Ashtekar and R. O. Hansen,A unified treatment of null and spatial infinity in general relativity. I - Universal structure, asymptotic symmetries, and conserved quantities at spatial infinity,J. Math. Phys.19(1978) 1542–1566

View on Pith 1978
[18]

A. Ashtekar and N. Khera,Unified treatment of null and spatial infinity III: asymptotically minkowski space-times,JHEP02(2024) 210, [2311.14130]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[20]

L. Donnay,Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective,Phys. Rept.1073(2024) 1–41, [2310.12922]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[21]

Galileo Galilei Institute (GGI), “Jelle hartong: "boundary energy-momentum tensors for asymptotically flat spacetimes".” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBZ-GiCzb_4&t=3641s, 2025

View on Pith 2025
[22]

A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. M. Petropoulos and M. Vilatte,Carroll-Cotton Tensors and Gravitational Radiation at Null Infinity,2608.28741

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[23]

E. A. Bergshoeff, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodríguez and J. Rosseel,A conformal approach to Carroll gravity,JHEP07(2025) 075, [2412.17752]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[24]

Y. Herfray,Asymptotic shear and the intrinsic conformal geometry of null-infinity,J. Math. Phys.61(2020) 072502, [2001.01281]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[25]

Y. Herfray,Tractor Geometry of Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,Annales Henri Poincare23(2022) 3265–3310, [2103.10405]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[26]

Y. Herfray,Carrollian manifolds and null infinity: a view from Cartan geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 215005, [2112.09048]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[27]

H. Afshar, X. Bekaert and M. Najafizadeh,Classification of conformal carroll algebras,JHEP12(2024) 148, [2409.19953]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[28]

J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, E. Have, S. Prohazka and J. Salzer,The gauging procedure and carrollian gravity,JHEP09(2022) 243, [2206.14178]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[29]

A. Ashtekar,Radiative Degrees of Freedom of the Gravitational Field in Exact General Relativity,J. Math. Phys.22(1981) 2885–2895

View on Pith 1981
[30]

Y. Korovin,Asymptotic symmetries and geometry on the boundary in the first order formalism,JHEP03(2018) 017, [1709.07647]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[31]

K. Nguyen,Schwarzian transformations at null infinity,PoSCORFU2021 (2022) 133, [2201.09640]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[32]

L. Baulieu, L. Ciambelli and T. Wetzstein,Extended-BMS Anomalies and Flat Space Holography,2504.10304

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[33]

L. Freidel and D. Pranzetti,Gravity from symmetry: duality and impulsive waves,JHEP04(2022) 125, [2109.06342]. 75

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[34]

M. Campiglia and J. Peraza,Generalized BMS charge algebra,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 104039, [2002.06691]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[35]

K. Nguyen and J. Salzer,The effective action of superrotation modes,JHEP 02(2021) 108, [2008.03321]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[36]

G. Compère, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi,Superboost transitions, refraction memory and super-Lorentz charge algebra,JHEP11(2018) 200, [1810.00377]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[37]

L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos and K. Siampos, Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,JHEP07(2018) 165, [1802.06809]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[38]

N. Mittal, P. M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour and M. Vilatte,Ehlers, Carroll, charges and dual charges,JHEP07(2023) 065, [2212.14062]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[39]

A. Campoleoni, A. Delfante, S. Pekar, P. M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour and M. Vilatte,Flat from anti de Sitter,JHEP12 (2023) 078, [2309.15182]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[40]

J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Perfect Fluids,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 003, [1710.04708]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[41]

K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty and T. Padmanabhan,Variational Principle for Gravity with Null and Non-null boundaries: A Unified Boundary Counter-term,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 129, [1602.07546]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[42]

A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel,Symplectic Geometry of Radiative Modes and Conserved Quantities at Null Infinity,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376(1981) 585–607

View on Pith 1981
[43]

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126027, [2212.12553]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[44]

L. Donnay, K. Nguyen and R. Ruzziconi,Loop-corrected subleading soft theorem and the celestial stress tensor,JHEP09(2022) 063, [2205.11477]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[45]

L. Donnay and R. Ruzziconi,BMS flux algebra in celestial holography,JHEP 11(2021) 040, [2108.11969]. 76

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Fluids on null hypersurfaces and Carrollian hydrodynamics
hep-th 2026-10 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

A systematic theory of ideal fluids on null hypersurfaces is developed, culminating in a decoupling limit that produces an autonomous thermal Carrollian fluid from a timelike ambient fluid.
Carrollian Conformal Dynamics and Flat-Space Holography
hep-th 2026-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

The Bondi shear is geometrically identified as a connection degree of freedom in Carrollian geometry, and the BMS evolution equations follow from Carrollian Ward identities after a chosen mapping to Bondi data.

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [19]

J. Hartong,work in progress,

View on Pith

[2] [1]

H. Bondi, M. van der Burg and A. Metzner,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond. A269(1962) 21–52

View on Pith 1962

[3] [2]

R. Sachs,Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond.A270(1962) 103–126

View on Pith 1962

[4] [3]

R. Sachs,Asymptotic symmetries in gravitational theory,Phys.Rev.128 (1962) 2851–2864

View on Pith 1962

[5] [4]

E. Newman and R. Penrose,An Approach to gravitational radiation by a method of spin coefficients,J. Math. Phys.3(1962) 566–578

View on Pith 1962

[6] [5]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Symmetries of asymptotically flat 4 dimensional spacetimes at null infinity revisited,Phys.Rev.Lett.105(2010) 111103, [0909.2617]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[7] [6]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence, JHEP1005(2010) 062, [1001.1541]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[8] [7]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,BMS charge algebra,JHEP12(2011) 105, [1106.0213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[9] [8]

G. Barnich and C. Troessaert,Supertranslations call for superrotations,PoS CNCFG2010(2010) 010, [1102.4632]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2010

[10] [9]

C. Duval, G. Gibbons and P. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups,J.Phys. A47(2014) 335204, [1403.4213]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[11] [10]

C. Duval, G. Gibbons and P. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,Class.Quant.Grav.31(2014) 092001, [1402.5894]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[12] [11]

J. Hartong,Holographic Reconstruction of 3D Flat Space-Time,JHEP10 (2016) 104, [1511.01387]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[13] [12]

J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,Boundary Energy-Momentum Tensors for Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,2505.05432

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[14] [13]

J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,The Energy-Momentum-News Complex near Future Null Infinity,2607.07872

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[15] [14]

A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. Marios Petropoulos and M. Vilatte, Carrollian-Holographic Derivation of Gravitational Flux-Balance Laws, Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 261602, [2505.00077]

View on Pith arXiv 2025

[16] [15]

J. Hartong,Gauging the Carroll Algebra and Ultra-Relativistic Gravity, JHEP08(2015) 069, [1505.05011]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2015

[17] [16]

R. Geroch,Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, inSymposium on Asymptotic Structure of Space-Time, 1977, DOI. 74

View on Pith 1977

[18] [17]

A. Ashtekar and R. O. Hansen,A unified treatment of null and spatial infinity in general relativity. I - Universal structure, asymptotic symmetries, and conserved quantities at spatial infinity,J. Math. Phys.19(1978) 1542–1566

View on Pith 1978

[19] [18]

A. Ashtekar and N. Khera,Unified treatment of null and spatial infinity III: asymptotically minkowski space-times,JHEP02(2024) 210, [2311.14130]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[20] [20]

L. Donnay,Celestial holography: An asymptotic symmetry perspective,Phys. Rept.1073(2024) 1–41, [2310.12922]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[21] [21]

Galileo Galilei Institute (GGI), “Jelle hartong: "boundary energy-momentum tensors for asymptotically flat spacetimes".” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBZ-GiCzb_4&t=3641s, 2025

View on Pith 2025

[22] [22]

A. Fiorucci, S. Pekar, P. M. Petropoulos and M. Vilatte,Carroll-Cotton Tensors and Gravitational Radiation at Null Infinity,2608.28741

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[23] [23]

E. A. Bergshoeff, P. Concha, O. Fierro, E. Rodríguez and J. Rosseel,A conformal approach to Carroll gravity,JHEP07(2025) 075, [2412.17752]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[24] [24]

Y. Herfray,Asymptotic shear and the intrinsic conformal geometry of null-infinity,J. Math. Phys.61(2020) 072502, [2001.01281]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[25] [25]

Y. Herfray,Tractor Geometry of Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes,Annales Henri Poincare23(2022) 3265–3310, [2103.10405]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[26] [26]

Y. Herfray,Carrollian manifolds and null infinity: a view from Cartan geometry,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022) 215005, [2112.09048]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[27] [27]

H. Afshar, X. Bekaert and M. Najafizadeh,Classification of conformal carroll algebras,JHEP12(2024) 148, [2409.19953]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[28] [28]

J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, E. Have, S. Prohazka and J. Salzer,The gauging procedure and carrollian gravity,JHEP09(2022) 243, [2206.14178]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[29] [29]

A. Ashtekar,Radiative Degrees of Freedom of the Gravitational Field in Exact General Relativity,J. Math. Phys.22(1981) 2885–2895

View on Pith 1981

[30] [30]

Y. Korovin,Asymptotic symmetries and geometry on the boundary in the first order formalism,JHEP03(2018) 017, [1709.07647]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[31] [31]

K. Nguyen,Schwarzian transformations at null infinity,PoSCORFU2021 (2022) 133, [2201.09640]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[32] [32]

L. Baulieu, L. Ciambelli and T. Wetzstein,Extended-BMS Anomalies and Flat Space Holography,2504.10304

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[33] [33]

L. Freidel and D. Pranzetti,Gravity from symmetry: duality and impulsive waves,JHEP04(2022) 125, [2109.06342]. 75

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[34] [34]

M. Campiglia and J. Peraza,Generalized BMS charge algebra,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020) 104039, [2002.06691]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[35] [35]

K. Nguyen and J. Salzer,The effective action of superrotation modes,JHEP 02(2021) 108, [2008.03321]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[36] [36]

G. Compère, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi,Superboost transitions, refraction memory and super-Lorentz charge algebra,JHEP11(2018) 200, [1810.00377]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[37] [37]

L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos and K. Siampos, Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,JHEP07(2018) 165, [1802.06809]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[38] [38]

N. Mittal, P. M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour and M. Vilatte,Ehlers, Carroll, charges and dual charges,JHEP07(2023) 065, [2212.14062]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[39] [39]

A. Campoleoni, A. Delfante, S. Pekar, P. M. Petropoulos, D. Rivera-Betancour and M. Vilatte,Flat from anti de Sitter,JHEP12 (2023) 078, [2309.15182]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[40] [40]

J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Perfect Fluids,SciPost Phys.5(2018) 003, [1710.04708]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[41] [41]

K. Parattu, S. Chakraborty and T. Padmanabhan,Variational Principle for Gravity with Null and Non-null boundaries: A Unified Boundary Counter-term,Eur. Phys. J. C76(2016) 129, [1602.07546]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[42] [42]

A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel,Symplectic Geometry of Radiative Modes and Conserved Quantities at Null Infinity,Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A376(1981) 585–607

View on Pith 1981

[43] [43]

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126027, [2212.12553]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[44] [44]

L. Donnay, K. Nguyen and R. Ruzziconi,Loop-corrected subleading soft theorem and the celestial stress tensor,JHEP09(2022) 063, [2205.11477]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[45] [45]

L. Donnay and R. Ruzziconi,BMS flux algebra in celestial holography,JHEP 11(2021) 040, [2108.11969]. 76

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021