Wrinkles and Magnetic Flux Trapping in Graphite Nanoflakes: A Possible Source and Manifestation of Room-Temperature Superconductivity

Dmitry A. Tayurskii; Muhammad Saad; Roman V. Yusupov; Sergey I. Nikitin

REVIEW

Wrinkles and Magnetic Flux Trapping in Graphite Nanoflakes: A Possible Source and Manifestation of Room-Temperature Superconductivity

Muhammad Saad, Sergey I. Nikitin, Dmitry A. Tayurskii, Roman V. Yusupov

Superconductivity · Submitted 14 Sep 2026 · 48 references

Pith's verdict: A clean correlation between air-annealing-induced wrinkles and magnetic flux trapping in graphite, but the impurity hypothesis isn't closed and the central claim hangs on it.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on September 15, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 5 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2609.15712 (version 1)

Pith IDVYF3TPQK, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationDmitry A. Tayurskii, Muhammad Saad, Roman V. Yusupov, Sergey I. Nikitin. "Wrinkles and Magnetic Flux Trapping in Graphite Nanoflakes: A Possible Source and Manifestation of Room-Temperature Superconductivity." arXiv:2609.15712 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VYF3TPQK

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This paper does one thing well: it shows a structural signature (wrinkle arrays) that appears only under air annealing and correlates with a magnetic moment trapped up to 390 K. The control samples (as-prepared, vacuum-annealed) lack both wrinkles and trapping. That pattern is suggestive and worth a closer look. The TEM/filtering work is documented carefully, and the vertical-shift analysis against exchange bias is clean enough.

What it doesn't do is rule out the obvious alternative: a tiny amount of ferromagnetic impurity that gets activated by air annealing. The authors cite their own earlier paper where cobalt oxide was present in a separately prepared sample—that makes the risk real, not hypothetical. The bulk XRD, XPS, and EDS they show have detection limits in the 0.1–1 wt% range, which is way too coarse for a 10⁻⁵ emu/g signal. The AAS results are promised but not shown. And the vertical-shift test only kills exchange bias, not ferromagnetic remanence—a field-cooled ferromagnet with a large enough coercivity would produce exactly the same signature. So the central claim—that this is superconductivity—is plausible but not yet convincing.

If I were the editor, I’d send this to a referee who knows magnetic impurity characterization in graphite. The structural correlation is real and reproducible; the interpretation needs stronger evidence (e.g., AC susceptibility, transport on an isolated wrinkle, or a dedicated magnetic impurity search with something like SQUID magnetometry on a matched control dirtied with candidate impurities). Without that, the paper stays at the level of a correlation report, which is okay but not yet a discovery claim. I’d accept peer review, but I’d flag the impurity issue to the referee explicitly.

Referee report

Major objections (3)

[Section 2.2, impurity analysis] The authors state that XRD, XPS, EDS and AAS measurements reveal no secondary magnetic phases, but only XRD and XPS data are shown in the Supplementary Material; the AAS results are not presented. XPS and XRD have detection limits on the order of 0.1–1 wt% and ~1%, respectively, which are insufficient to exclude finely dispersed nanoscale magnetic impurities (e.g., Fe, Co, Ni oxides) that could produce a trapped moment of ~10⁻⁵ emu/g. Given that Ref. 39 explicitly documents cobalt oxide contamination in a separately prepared sample, this concern is particularly relevant. The authors should provide the AAS data with stated detection limits and, ideally, perform more sensitive analyses such as ICP-MS or SQUID magnetometry of a control sample (e.g., an equivalent anneal of the empty container) to definitively rule out trace ferromagnetic contamination.
[Section 2.2, interpretation of vertical shift] The vertical-shift analysis (Figure S5) convincingly rules out an exchange-bias horizontal shift, but it does not eliminate the possibility of ferromagnetic remanence. A field-cooled ferromagnet with a coercive field larger than the measurement sweep range (here ±1 T) would also produce a vertically offset hysteresis loop. The authors should provide a quantitative argument or additional data (e.g., M(H) loops after cooling in different fields, field-dependent remnant magnetization, or AC susceptibility measurements) to distinguish superconducting flux trapping from ferromagnetic remanence. This distinction is load-bearing because the central claim depends on a superconducting origin.
[Section 2.2, Figure 7] The trapped moment (Figure 7b) decays gradually on warming and shows no sharp transition. The authors attribute this to a distribution of critical temperatures in different wrinkle regions. However, they do not estimate the volume fraction of superconducting material required to produce the observed signal (~2×10⁻⁵ emu/g). An estimate of the superconducting volume fraction would strengthen the claim and could be compared with the areal density of wrinkles seen in TEM. Additionally, the gradual decay could also be consistent with thermally activated relaxation of a ferromagnetic signal; a discussion of this alternative would improve the analysis.

Minor objections (5)

[General] The AAS data promised in the text (Section 2.2, last paragraph) are not shown in the manuscript or Supplementary Material. The authors should either include these data or remove the claim.
[Section 2.1, Figure 4 caption] The arrow in the 2D-FFT panel is mentioned in the text but not labeled in the figure or caption. It would be helpful to add a visible marker or explicitly describe the feature in the caption.
[Section 2.2, units] The diamagnetic susceptibility is reported as emu g⁻¹ Oe⁻¹. For consistency with SI conventions, consider using emu g⁻¹ Oe⁻¹ or converting to m³/kg. The current units are acceptable but should be defined on first use.
[Section 4, Experimental] The authors state that dry grinding was carried out in an inert atmosphere of ultrapure argon or nitrogen. Was any metal contamination from the agate mortar considered? Agate can contain trace iron; a brief comment on this potential source would be helpful.
[References] Reference 42 (Seo et al.) appears to be a placeholder (DOI: 10.1038/s41586-026-10815-x) and may not yet be published. Verify that this reference is accessible or cite the preprint version.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Air-annealed graphite nanoflakes develop wrinkle arrays that trap magnetic flux up to 390 K, signaling local room-temperature superconductivity.

The reading

The paper reports that graphite nanoflakes subjected to prolonged grinding followed by mild annealing in air at 670 K develop dense arrays of wrinkle-like defects on their basal planes. These wrinkled samples exhibit a trapped magnetic moment that persists up to at least 390 K, one of the definitive signatures of superconductivity. In contrast, as-ground flakes and flakes annealed in vacuum show neither wrinkles nor flux trapping. The authors argue that the wrinkled regions themselves act as sources of local high-temperature superconductivity, providing a direct structure–property link between a specific morphological feature and a superconducting response above room temperature.

What carries the argument

The central object is the wrinkle network—extended, nearly parallel line defects formed by strain relaxation during air annealing. These wrinkles are proposed to locally modify the electronic structure (e.g., enhance the density of states) and to act as pinning sites for Abrikosov vortices, enabling persistent currents that trap magnetic flux. The flux trapping is measured via vibrating-sample magnetometry and analyzed by comparing zero-field-cooled and field-cooled hysteresis loops, distinguishing vertical (flux trapping) from horizontal (exchange bias) shifts.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that a simple two-step process—extended dry grinding of bulk pyrolytic graphite followed by air annealing at 670 K—generates high-density, nearly parallel wrinkle arrays on the basal planes of graphite nanoflakes. TEM imaging enhanced by 2D-FFT filtering reveals these wrinkles, while magnetization measurements show a vertical shift in field-cooled hysteresis loops that is unambiguously attributed to trapped magnetic flux (not exchange bias). The trapped moment persists above 390 K, and its sign is controlled by the cooling field direction. The correlation is exclusive: only the air-annealed sample bearing wrinkle networks exhibits flux trapping, whereas unannealed and vacuum-annealed controls do not. This is presented as evidence that wrinkled regions host granular high-temperature superconductivity.

Load-bearing premise

The trapped magnetic moments are attributed to persistent supercurrents from superconducting regions, but the possibility of a dilute, highly dispersed ferromagnetic phase below the detection limits of bulk chemical analysis (XRD, XPS, EDS) has not been definitively ruled out.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If correct, the work establishes a reproducible, low-temperature route to engineer room-temperature superconducting regions in graphite without chemical doping or intercalation.
The direct correlation between a specific structural motif (wrinkles) and a macroscopic superconducting signature (flux trapping) provides a target for theoretical modeling of strain-induced superconductivity in layered carbon systems.
The observation of flux trapping at and above 390 K sets a lower bound on the superconducting transition temperature of the granular regions, suggesting that local Tc may exceed 400 K in optimized wrinkle geometries.
The contact-free magnetization method avoids ambiguities of transport measurements in granular superconductors, making the flux-trapping signature a robust diagnostic for future searches of room-temperature superconductivity in other 2D materials.
The annealing atmosphere (air vs. vacuum) becomes a control parameter for strain relaxation pathway, allowing selective generation of wrinkled (superconducting) versus torn (non-superconducting) surface morphologies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper does not directly measure zero resistance or the Meissner effect; the flux trapping signature, though strong, is indirect. A direct detection of a Meissner expulsion in a single wrinkle would close the loop.
The absence of detectable magnetic impurities (by XRD, XPS, EDS) strengthens the superconductivity hypothesis, but bulk-sensitive techniques may miss nanoscale ferromagnetic clusters. A micrometer-scale magnetic imaging technique (e.g., SQUID-on-tip or NV-center microscopy) could spatially correlate trapped flux with individual wrinkles.
The paper notes that grinding must be done in inert atmosphere and without organic solvents; this suggests that chemisorbed species or oxidation edges may be essential for wrinkle formation. Extending the protocol to other layered materials (e.g., BN, MoS2) could test the universality of strain-induced superconductivity.

Original abstract

The paper reports on a possible manifestation of local high-temperature superconductivity in graphite nanoflakes obtained from the bulk pyrolytic graphite by an extended grinding and subsequent annealing at 670 K in the air. Analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images shows that such treatment leads to a formation of high-density wrinkle-type defects at the basal-plane surface. The sample reveals the magnetic flux trapping - one of the key signatures of superconductivity - that persists up to 390 K and above. At the same time, both the as-ground (unannealed) and annealed in the vacuum samples manifest negligible flux trapping, and no wrinkles in their TEM images were found. The direct correlation between the appearance of high-density wrinkle arrays and the detection of the trapped magnetic flux above the room temperature strongly suggests that wrinkled regions serve a source of local high-temperature superconductivity in graphite.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,422 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.36 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.92 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.75 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The paper reports on a possible manifestation of local high-temperature superconductivity in graphite nanoflakes obtained from the bulk pyrolytic graphite by an extended grinding and subsequent annealing at 670 K in the air. Analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images shows that such treatment leads to a formation of high-density wrinkle-type defects at the basal-plane surface. The sample reveals the magnetic flux trapping - one of the key signatures of superconductivity - that persists up to 390 K and above. At the same time, both the as-ground (unannealed) and annealed in the vacuum samples manifest negligible flux trapping, and no wrinkles in their TEM images were found. The direct correlation between the appearance of high-density wrinkle arrays and the detection of the trapped magnetic flux above the room temperature strongly suggests that wrinkled regions serve a source of local high-temperature superconductivity in graphite.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The paper reports on a possible manifestation of local high-temperature superconductivity in graphite nanoflakes obtained from the bulk pyrolytic graphite by an extended grinding and subsequent annealing at 670 K in the air.	contribution 0.91	0.91	0.26	hedged possibility 0.98
s1	Analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images shows that such treatment leads to a formation of high-density wrinkle-type defects at the basal-plane surface.	result 0.91	0.92	0.03	asserted 1.00
s2	The sample reveals the magnetic flux trapping - one of the key signatures of superconductivity - that persists up to 390 K and above.	result 1.00	0.91	0.14	asserted 1.00
s3	At the same time, both the as-ground (unannealed) and annealed in the vacuum samples manifest negligible flux trapping, and no wrinkles in their TEM images were found.	result 1.00	0.92	0.04	asserted 1.00
s4	The direct correlation between the appearance of high-density wrinkle arrays and the detection of the trapped magnetic flux above the room temperature strongly suggests that wrinkled regions serve a source of local high-temperature superconductivity in graphite.	interpretation 1.00	0.85	0.94	hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 5.** Schematic view of morphology transformation with the mild annealing at 670 K of the finely ground graphite flake surface (top) under vacuum (left) and air (right) atmospheres. Another although very similar path towards wrinkle formation was proposed in Ref. 33 and represent essentially a strain-relief process within initially decoupled and twisted graphite sheets. The Moire’ patterns visible in the as-prepared graphite flakes (

**Figure 6.** Magnetization M(H) dependences at T = 10 K for the as-prepared, vacuumannealed and air-annealed samples. For each panel, the ZFC M(H) curve is shown together FC ones with a field of + 1 T (red) or − 1 T (blue) was applied during cooling. Panels on the right show magnified views of the low-field regions ( 100 mT) indicated by rectangles on the left. These modifications are consistent with TEM data. Thus, reducing the lateral flake size on its tear under vacuum annealing restricts the continuous area for current induction and leads to a decrease of diamagnetic susceptibility. The a

Showing 2 of the paper's 6 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:2609.15712 by the authors.

References

Works cited (48)

[1]

W. A. Little, "Superconductivity at room temperature," Scientific American 212, no. 2 (1965): 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0265-21

View on Pith doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0265-21 1965
[2]

N. B. Hannay, T. H. Geballe, B. T. Matthias, et al. , "Superconductivity in graphitic compounds," Physical Review Letters 14 , no. 7 (1965): 225. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.225

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.225 1965
[3]

K. Antonowicz, "Possible superconductivity at room temperature," Nature 247, no. 5440 (1974): 358-360. https://doi.org/10.1038/247358a0

View on Pith doi:10.1038/247358a0 1974
[4]

P. Esquinazi, T.T. Heikkilä, Y.V. Lysogorskiy, et al. , "On the superconductivity of graphite interfaces," JETP Letters 100 (2014): 336 -

View on Pith 2014
[5]

T. Scheike, P. Esquinazi, A. Setzer, W. Böhlmann, "Granular superconductivity at room temperature in bulk highly oriented pyrolytic graphite samples," Carbon 59 (2013): 140-

View on Pith 2013
[6]

P.D. Esquin azi, C.E. Precker, M. Stiller, et al. , "Evidence for room temperature superconductivity at graphite interfaces: Room temperature superconductivity," Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 5 (2018): 41 -

View on Pith 2018
[7]

T. Scheike, W. Böhlmann, P. Esquinazi, et al. , "Can Doping Graphite Trigger Room Temperature Superconductivity? Evidence for Granular High ‐Temperature Superconductivity in Water‐Treated Graphite Powder," Advanced Materials 24, no. 43 (2012): 5826-5831. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201202219

View on Pith doi:10.1002/adma.201202219 2012
[8]

G. Larkins, Y. Vlasov, K. Holland, "Evidence of superconductivity in doped graphite and graphene," Superconductor Science and Technology 29, no. 1 (2016): 015015 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/29/1/015015

View on Pith doi:10.1088/0953-2048/29/1/015015 2016
[9]

R.R. da Silva, J.H.S. Torres, Y. Kopelevich, "Indication of superconductivity at 35 K in graphite-sulfur composites," Physical Review Letters 87 (2001): 147001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.147001

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.147001 2001
[10]

Y. Kawashima, "Possible room temperature superconductivity in conductors obtained by bringing alkanes into contact with a graphite surface," AIP Advances 3, no. 5 (2013): 052132. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4808207

View on Pith doi:10.1063/1.4808207 2013
[11]

Y. Kopelevich, P. Esquinazi, J. Torres, S. Moehlecke, "Ferromagnetic - and superconducting-like behavior of graphite," Journal of Low Temperature Physics 119 (2000): 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004637814008

View on Pith doi:10.1023/a:1004637814008 2000
[12]

A. Champi, C.E. Precker, P.D. Esquinazi, "Hints of granular superconductivity in natural graphite verified by trapped flux transport measurements," New Journal of Physics 25, no. 9 (2023): 093029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acf6ab

View on Pith doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acf6ab 2023
[13]

Y. Kopelevich, J. Torres, R. da Silva, et al., "Global Room ‐Temperature Superconductivity in Graphite," Advanced Quantum Technologies 7, no. 2 (2024): 2300230. https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202300230

View on Pith doi:10.1002/qute.202300230 2024
[14]

S. Ladak, J.M. Ball, D. Moseley, et al., "Observation of wrinkle induced potential drops in biased chemically derived graphene thin film networks," Carbon 64 (2013): 35 -

View on Pith 2013
[15]

K. Xu, P. Cao, J.R. Heath, "Scanning tunneling microscopy characterization of the electrical properties of wrinkles in exfoliated graphene monolayers," Nano Letters 9, no. 12 (2009): 4446-4451. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl902729p

View on Pith doi:10.1021/nl902729p 2009
[16]

H.M. Nilsson, L. de Knoop, J. Cumings, E. Olsson, "Localized resistance measurements of wrinkled reduced graphene oxide using in -situ transmission electron microscopy," Carbon 113 (2017): 340 -345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.086

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.086 2017
[17]

S. Gupta, M. N. Mattur, B. I. Yakobson, "Mechanical crease in 2D materials —A platform for large spin splitting and persistent spin helix," Matter 8, no. 9 (2025): 102378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2025.102378

View on Pith arXiv 2025
[18]

Y. Yao, J. Li, J. Ye, F. Yang, D. X. Yao, "Electric field induced superconductivity in bilayer octagraphene," Chinese Physics Letters 42, no. 6 (2025): 067504 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/42/6/067504

View on Pith doi:10.1088/0256-307x/42/6/067504 2025
[19]

Q. Ji, B. Li, J. Christensen, C. Wang, M. Kadic, "Unconventional superconductivity in magic-strain graphene superlattices," Materials Today preprint (2024): SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895564

View on Pith doi:10.2139/ssrn.4895564 2024
[21]

G. Chen, A.L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, et al. , "Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice," Nature 572, no. 7768 (2019): 215 -

View on Pith 2019
[22]

J.M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo -Herrero, "Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic -angle twisted trilayer graphene," Nature 590, no. 7845 (2021): 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03192-0

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03192-0 2021
[23]

T. V erhagen, B. Pacakova, M. Bousa, et al. , "Superlattice in collapsed graphene wrinkles," Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 9972. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019- 46372-9

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41598-019- 2019
[24]

A. Fasolino, J.H. Los, M.I. Katsnelson, "Intrinsic ripples in graphene," Nature Materials 6, no. 11 (2007): 858-861. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2011

View on Pith doi:10.1038/nmat2011 2007
[25]

X. Shen, X. Lin, N. Yousefi, J. Jia, J.K. Kim, "Wrinkling in graphene sheets and graphene oxide papers," Carbon 66 (2014): 84 -

View on Pith 2014
[26]

Deng, Shikai, and Vikas Berry. "Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mechanism, electronic properties, and applications." Materials Today 19, no. 4 (2016): 197-212. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.002

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.002 2016
[27]

Z. Zhu, L. Zhan, T.M. Shih, et al. , "Critical annealing temperature for stacking orientation of bilayer graphene," Small 14, no. 39 (2018): 1802498. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802498

View on Pith doi:10.1002/smll.201802498 2018
[28]

C. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Lan, H. Tan, "Graphene wrinkling: formation, evolution and collapse," Nanoscale 5, no. 10 (2013): 4454-4461. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR00462G

View on Pith doi:10.1039/c3nr00462g 2013
[29]

W. Wang, S. Yang, A. Wang, "Strain induced highly oriented graphene wrinkles," Materials Research Express 4, no. 7 (2017): 075601. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053- 1591/aa7324

View on Pith doi:10.1088/2053- 2017
[30]

D. Berger, C. Ratsch, "Line defects in graphene: How doping affects the electronic and mechanical properties," Physical Review B 93, no. 23 (2016): 235441. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.235441

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.235441 2016
[31]

J. Meng, R. Ma, T. Ma, H.Q. Lin, "Flat bands and superconductivity induced by periodic strain in monolayer graphene," Physical Review B 110, no. 23 (2024): 235128 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.235128

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.235128 2024
[32]

Q. Ji, B. Li, J. Christensen, C. Wang, M. Kadic, "Phonon -mediated superconductivity in magic -strain bilayer graphene," Physical Review B 112, no. 6 (2025): 064507 . https://doi.org/10.1103/5v5w-8vtn

View on Pith doi:10.1103/5v5w-8vtn 2025
[33]

M.K. Singh, E. Titus, G. Gonçalves, et al. , "Atomic -scale observation of rotational misorientation in suspended few -layer graphene sheets," Nanoscale 2, no. 5 (2010): 700-708. https://doi.org/10.1039/B9NR00256A

View on Pith doi:10.1039/b9nr00256a 2010
[34]

M. Saad, A.M. Rogov, A.G. Kiiamov, et al. , "Mesoscopic scale rearrangements of graphite nanoflake open edges under mild annealing treatments," Vacuum 199 (2022): 110977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.110977

View on Pith arXiv 2022
[35]

M.M. Alyobi, C.J. Barnett, R.J. Cobley, "Effects of thermal annealing on the properties of mechanically exfoliated suspended and on-substrate few-layer graphene," Crystals 7, no. 11 (2017): 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7110349 20

View on Pith doi:10.3390/cryst7110349 2017
[36]

J. Gruber, M.W. Barsoum, G.J. Tucker, "Characterization of ripplocation mobility in graphite," Materials Research Letters 8, no. 2 (2020): 82 -87. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.1702115

View on Pith arXiv 2020
[37]

M.S. El -Genk, J.M.P. Tournier, "Development and validation of a model for the chemical kinetics of graphite oxidation," Journal of Nuclear Materials 411, no. 1 -3 (2011): 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.129

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.129 2011
[38]

V.I. Tsebro, O.E. Omel' yanovskii, A.P. Moravskii, "Persistent currents and magnetic flux trapping in fragments of carbon deposits containing multiwalled nanotubes," Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 70 (1999): 462 -

View on Pith 1999
[39]

M. Saad, I.F. Gilmutdinov, A.G. Kiiamov, et al., "Observation of persistent currents in finely dispersed pyrolytic graphite," JETP Letters 107, no. 1 (2018): 37 -41. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364018010101

View on Pith doi:10.1134/s0021364018010101 2018
[40]

M. Saad, A.G. Kiiamov, S.I. Nikitin, et al., "Ferromagnetism of Graphite Nanopowders with Cobalt Oxide Impurity and Its Evolution at Moderate Annealing," Inorganic Materials: Applied Research 14, no. 1 (2023): 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207511332301032X

View on Pith doi:10.1134/s207511332301032x 2023
[41]

R. Prozorov, "On the trapped magnetic moment in type -II superconductors," Superconductor Science and Technology 37 , no. 11 (2024): 115032 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad86f0

View on Pith doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ad86f0 2024
[42]

J. Seo, A.A. Cotten, S. Ye, et al., "Family of magnetic field-boosted superconductors in rhombohedral graphene," Nature (2026): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026- 10815-x 1 Supporting Information for the article Wrinkles and Magnetic Flux Trapping in Pyrolytic Graphite Nanoflakes: Possible Source and Manifestation of Room Temperature Superconductivi...

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-026- 2026
[44]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.051

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.051 2013
[53]

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-017-0131-0 18

View on Pith doi:10.1007/s40509-017-0131-0
[92]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.046

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.046 2013
[149]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.002

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.002 2013
[219]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1393-y

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1393-y
[339]

https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364014170056

View on Pith doi:10.1134/s0021364014170056
[468]

https://doi.org/10.1134/1.568197

View on Pith doi:10.1134/1.568197

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

W. A. Little, "Superconductivity at room temperature," Scientific American 212, no. 2 (1965): 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0265-21

View on Pith doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0265-21 1965

[2] [2]

N. B. Hannay, T. H. Geballe, B. T. Matthias, et al. , "Superconductivity in graphitic compounds," Physical Review Letters 14 , no. 7 (1965): 225. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.225

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevlett.14.225 1965

[3] [3]

K. Antonowicz, "Possible superconductivity at room temperature," Nature 247, no. 5440 (1974): 358-360. https://doi.org/10.1038/247358a0

View on Pith doi:10.1038/247358a0 1974

[4] [4]

P. Esquinazi, T.T. Heikkilä, Y.V. Lysogorskiy, et al. , "On the superconductivity of graphite interfaces," JETP Letters 100 (2014): 336 -

View on Pith 2014

[5] [5]

T. Scheike, P. Esquinazi, A. Setzer, W. Böhlmann, "Granular superconductivity at room temperature in bulk highly oriented pyrolytic graphite samples," Carbon 59 (2013): 140-

View on Pith 2013

[6] [6]

P.D. Esquin azi, C.E. Precker, M. Stiller, et al. , "Evidence for room temperature superconductivity at graphite interfaces: Room temperature superconductivity," Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 5 (2018): 41 -

View on Pith 2018

[7] [7]

T. Scheike, W. Böhlmann, P. Esquinazi, et al. , "Can Doping Graphite Trigger Room Temperature Superconductivity? Evidence for Granular High ‐Temperature Superconductivity in Water‐Treated Graphite Powder," Advanced Materials 24, no. 43 (2012): 5826-5831. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201202219

View on Pith doi:10.1002/adma.201202219 2012

[8] [8]

G. Larkins, Y. Vlasov, K. Holland, "Evidence of superconductivity in doped graphite and graphene," Superconductor Science and Technology 29, no. 1 (2016): 015015 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/29/1/015015

View on Pith doi:10.1088/0953-2048/29/1/015015 2016

[9] [9]

R.R. da Silva, J.H.S. Torres, Y. Kopelevich, "Indication of superconductivity at 35 K in graphite-sulfur composites," Physical Review Letters 87 (2001): 147001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.147001

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevlett.87.147001 2001

[10] [10]

Y. Kawashima, "Possible room temperature superconductivity in conductors obtained by bringing alkanes into contact with a graphite surface," AIP Advances 3, no. 5 (2013): 052132. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4808207

View on Pith doi:10.1063/1.4808207 2013

[11] [11]

Y. Kopelevich, P. Esquinazi, J. Torres, S. Moehlecke, "Ferromagnetic - and superconducting-like behavior of graphite," Journal of Low Temperature Physics 119 (2000): 691-702. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004637814008

View on Pith doi:10.1023/a:1004637814008 2000

[12] [12]

A. Champi, C.E. Precker, P.D. Esquinazi, "Hints of granular superconductivity in natural graphite verified by trapped flux transport measurements," New Journal of Physics 25, no. 9 (2023): 093029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acf6ab

View on Pith doi:10.1088/1367-2630/acf6ab 2023

[13] [13]

Y. Kopelevich, J. Torres, R. da Silva, et al., "Global Room ‐Temperature Superconductivity in Graphite," Advanced Quantum Technologies 7, no. 2 (2024): 2300230. https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202300230

View on Pith doi:10.1002/qute.202300230 2024

[14] [14]

S. Ladak, J.M. Ball, D. Moseley, et al., "Observation of wrinkle induced potential drops in biased chemically derived graphene thin film networks," Carbon 64 (2013): 35 -

View on Pith 2013

[15] [15]

K. Xu, P. Cao, J.R. Heath, "Scanning tunneling microscopy characterization of the electrical properties of wrinkles in exfoliated graphene monolayers," Nano Letters 9, no. 12 (2009): 4446-4451. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl902729p

View on Pith doi:10.1021/nl902729p 2009

[16] [16]

H.M. Nilsson, L. de Knoop, J. Cumings, E. Olsson, "Localized resistance measurements of wrinkled reduced graphene oxide using in -situ transmission electron microscopy," Carbon 113 (2017): 340 -345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.086

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.10.086 2017

[17] [17]

S. Gupta, M. N. Mattur, B. I. Yakobson, "Mechanical crease in 2D materials —A platform for large spin splitting and persistent spin helix," Matter 8, no. 9 (2025): 102378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2025.102378

View on Pith arXiv 2025

[18] [18]

Y. Yao, J. Li, J. Ye, F. Yang, D. X. Yao, "Electric field induced superconductivity in bilayer octagraphene," Chinese Physics Letters 42, no. 6 (2025): 067504 . https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/42/6/067504

View on Pith doi:10.1088/0256-307x/42/6/067504 2025

[19] [19]

Q. Ji, B. Li, J. Christensen, C. Wang, M. Kadic, "Unconventional superconductivity in magic-strain graphene superlattices," Materials Today preprint (2024): SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895564

View on Pith doi:10.2139/ssrn.4895564 2024

[20] [21]

G. Chen, A.L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, et al. , "Signatures of tunable superconductivity in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice," Nature 572, no. 7768 (2019): 215 -

View on Pith 2019

[21] [22]

J.M. Park, Y. Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Jarillo -Herrero, "Tunable strongly coupled superconductivity in magic -angle twisted trilayer graphene," Nature 590, no. 7845 (2021): 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03192-0

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03192-0 2021

[22] [23]

T. V erhagen, B. Pacakova, M. Bousa, et al. , "Superlattice in collapsed graphene wrinkles," Scientific Reports 9, no. 1 (2019): 9972. http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019- 46372-9

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41598-019- 2019

[23] [24]

A. Fasolino, J.H. Los, M.I. Katsnelson, "Intrinsic ripples in graphene," Nature Materials 6, no. 11 (2007): 858-861. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2011

View on Pith doi:10.1038/nmat2011 2007

[24] [25]

X. Shen, X. Lin, N. Yousefi, J. Jia, J.K. Kim, "Wrinkling in graphene sheets and graphene oxide papers," Carbon 66 (2014): 84 -

View on Pith 2014

[25] [26]

Deng, Shikai, and Vikas Berry. "Wrinkled, rippled and crumpled graphene: an overview of formation mechanism, electronic properties, and applications." Materials Today 19, no. 4 (2016): 197-212. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.002

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.10.002 2016

[26] [27]

Z. Zhu, L. Zhan, T.M. Shih, et al. , "Critical annealing temperature for stacking orientation of bilayer graphene," Small 14, no. 39 (2018): 1802498. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201802498

View on Pith doi:10.1002/smll.201802498 2018

[27] [28]

C. Wang, Y. Liu, L. Lan, H. Tan, "Graphene wrinkling: formation, evolution and collapse," Nanoscale 5, no. 10 (2013): 4454-4461. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR00462G

View on Pith doi:10.1039/c3nr00462g 2013

[28] [29]

W. Wang, S. Yang, A. Wang, "Strain induced highly oriented graphene wrinkles," Materials Research Express 4, no. 7 (2017): 075601. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053- 1591/aa7324

View on Pith doi:10.1088/2053- 2017

[29] [30]

D. Berger, C. Ratsch, "Line defects in graphene: How doping affects the electronic and mechanical properties," Physical Review B 93, no. 23 (2016): 235441. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.235441

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.235441 2016

[30] [31]

J. Meng, R. Ma, T. Ma, H.Q. Lin, "Flat bands and superconductivity induced by periodic strain in monolayer graphene," Physical Review B 110, no. 23 (2024): 235128 . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.235128

View on Pith doi:10.1103/physrevb.110.235128 2024

[31] [32]

Q. Ji, B. Li, J. Christensen, C. Wang, M. Kadic, "Phonon -mediated superconductivity in magic -strain bilayer graphene," Physical Review B 112, no. 6 (2025): 064507 . https://doi.org/10.1103/5v5w-8vtn

View on Pith doi:10.1103/5v5w-8vtn 2025

[32] [33]

M.K. Singh, E. Titus, G. Gonçalves, et al. , "Atomic -scale observation of rotational misorientation in suspended few -layer graphene sheets," Nanoscale 2, no. 5 (2010): 700-708. https://doi.org/10.1039/B9NR00256A

View on Pith doi:10.1039/b9nr00256a 2010

[33] [34]

M. Saad, A.M. Rogov, A.G. Kiiamov, et al. , "Mesoscopic scale rearrangements of graphite nanoflake open edges under mild annealing treatments," Vacuum 199 (2022): 110977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.110977

View on Pith arXiv 2022

[34] [35]

M.M. Alyobi, C.J. Barnett, R.J. Cobley, "Effects of thermal annealing on the properties of mechanically exfoliated suspended and on-substrate few-layer graphene," Crystals 7, no. 11 (2017): 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst7110349 20

View on Pith doi:10.3390/cryst7110349 2017

[35] [36]

J. Gruber, M.W. Barsoum, G.J. Tucker, "Characterization of ripplocation mobility in graphite," Materials Research Letters 8, no. 2 (2020): 82 -87. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.1702115

View on Pith arXiv 2020

[36] [37]

M.S. El -Genk, J.M.P. Tournier, "Development and validation of a model for the chemical kinetics of graphite oxidation," Journal of Nuclear Materials 411, no. 1 -3 (2011): 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.129

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.129 2011

[37] [38]

V.I. Tsebro, O.E. Omel' yanovskii, A.P. Moravskii, "Persistent currents and magnetic flux trapping in fragments of carbon deposits containing multiwalled nanotubes," Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 70 (1999): 462 -

View on Pith 1999

[38] [39]

M. Saad, I.F. Gilmutdinov, A.G. Kiiamov, et al., "Observation of persistent currents in finely dispersed pyrolytic graphite," JETP Letters 107, no. 1 (2018): 37 -41. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364018010101

View on Pith doi:10.1134/s0021364018010101 2018

[39] [40]

M. Saad, A.G. Kiiamov, S.I. Nikitin, et al., "Ferromagnetism of Graphite Nanopowders with Cobalt Oxide Impurity and Its Evolution at Moderate Annealing," Inorganic Materials: Applied Research 14, no. 1 (2023): 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1134/S207511332301032X

View on Pith doi:10.1134/s207511332301032x 2023

[40] [41]

R. Prozorov, "On the trapped magnetic moment in type -II superconductors," Superconductor Science and Technology 37 , no. 11 (2024): 115032 . https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ad86f0

View on Pith doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ad86f0 2024

[41] [42]

J. Seo, A.A. Cotten, S. Ye, et al., "Family of magnetic field-boosted superconductors in rhombohedral graphene," Nature (2026): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026- 10815-x 1 Supporting Information for the article Wrinkles and Magnetic Flux Trapping in Pyrolytic Graphite Nanoflakes: Possible Source and Manifestation of Room Temperature Superconductivi...

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-026- 2026

[42] [44]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.051

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.06.051 2013

[43] [53]

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40509-017-0131-0 18

View on Pith doi:10.1007/s40509-017-0131-0

[44] [92]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.046

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.046 2013

[45] [149]

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.002

View on Pith doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.002 2013

[46] [219]

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1393-y

View on Pith doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1393-y

[47] [339]

https://doi.org/10.1134/S0021364014170056

View on Pith doi:10.1134/s0021364014170056

[48] [468]

https://doi.org/10.1134/1.568197

View on Pith doi:10.1134/1.568197