Electronic Reconstruction across the Tilt-Free Transition in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$

Bastien Michon; Bosen Wang; Ferenc Borondics; Gergely N\'emeth; Jianping Sun; Jinguang Cheng; Mengjie Kong; Yingpeng Yu

REVIEW

Electronic Reconstruction across the Tilt-Free Transition in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$

Mengjie Kong, Gergely Németh, Yingpeng Yu, Bosen Wang, Jianping Sun, Jinguang Cheng, Ferenc Borondics, Bastien Michon

Superconductivity · Submitted 30 Sep 2026 · 22 references

Pith's verdict: Honest, careful spectroscopy with a robust spectral-weight result; the 3d_z2 orbital story rides on an uncertified fit and an ad hoc level scheme that contradict the cited DFT.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 1, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2609.40139 (version 1)

Pith IDLDPCJ3TL, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationBastien Michon, Bosen Wang, Ferenc Borondics, Gergely N\'emeth, Jianping Sun, Jinguang Cheng, Mengjie Kong, Yingpeng Yu. "Electronic Reconstruction across the Tilt-Free Transition in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$." arXiv:2609.40139 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LDPCJ3TL

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The useful thing here is the measurement. Broadband reflectivity from 15 meV to 3.2 eV across the ambient-pressure tilt-free transition at 544 K, referenced at each temperature, reproduced over multiple heating and cooling cycles — that is careful work, and the core result survives scrutiny. The spectral-weight transfer from 1–3 eV down to below 1 eV (Fig. 2) is a direct Kramers–Kronig output of measured reflectivity, and the authors cross-check it against an 8000 cm⁻¹ boundary and against finer frequency intervals (Fig. S3). That part is solid and new relative to the high-pressure work. They should get credit for it.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test puts it. The "most striking" evidence — L2/L3 merging — is a fitted outcome of one six-Lorentzian model with no reported uncertainties on ω₀, ω_p, or Γ, and Fig. S4(c) shows the two oscillators converging to identical parameters at 723 K. When two broad peaks approach within their combined widths, parameter correlations make the fit degenerate; the paper does not compare against a five-oscillator model. To their credit, the authors state in b77 that the decomposition is phenomenological and model-dependent, so this is an acknowledged limit, not a concealed one. But it matters more than they let on, because the whole orbital story rests on it.

The second leg is weaker. Assigning L2/L3 to antibonding 3d_z2 branches requires a level scheme in which the bonding bands are split with the Fermi level between them — directly against the cited DFT+U, which puts bonding states below E_F. The paper concedes the HF/HT difference and offers no ambient-pressure or high-temperature calculation. So the orbital specificity of the claim is not established. If the merging is a fitting artifact or the assignment is wrong, you are left with a robust but orbital-agnostic electronic reconstruction.

I do not think this is fatal. The measurement is real, the phenomenology is coherent, and the superconductivity link is appropriately hedged with "suggests." The fix is proportionate: fit uncertainties, a reduced-oscillator comparison, and a far more guarded statement about the level scheme. Because the central robust finding is genuinely new and useful, this deserves a serious referee — it would be a disservice to desk-reject it. But the referee should push on the model comparison and the orbital assignment, not the data. My read is that the stress-test is right on both counts, and the reader's CONDITIONAL verdict is about the right weight.

Referee report

Significance

If the central claim holds, the paper provides a valuable experimental bridge between a well-characterized lattice transition (tilt suppression without applied pressure) and the orbital sector (3d_z2 interlayer coupling) that is central to proposed pairing mechanisms in La3Ni2O7. The strengths of the work are its direct, reproducible measurements and the fact that the broadband spectral-weight redistribution of Fig. 2 is a direct output of the measured reflectivity via Kramers–Kronig analysis, not a fitted target. The component-resolved presentation is transparent, and the authors explicitly acknowledge (sentence b77) that the Lorentzian decomposition is phenomenological and model dependent. The significance of the specific orbital-level claim ('3d_z2 reconstruction'), however, rests on the L2/L3 merging and on the orbital assignment of the oscillators, both of which need strengthening before the headline conclusion is fully established.

Major objections (3)

[Drude–Lorentz analysis, Figs. 3 and S4] The L2/L3 'merging' is the load-bearing evidence for the 3d_z2 reconstruction claim, but its robustness against model degeneracy is not demonstrated. No uncertainties are reported for the fitted parameters ω0, ωp, or Γ, and Fig. S4(c) shows that at 723 K the L2 and L3 parameters converge to identical values, i.e., the two oscillators collapse into a single effective resonance. When two broad oscillators approach within their combined linewidths, their parameters become strongly correlated, and a single broad oscillator can reproduce the two-peak structure; the paper does not report a comparison against a five-oscillator model or against a four-oscillator-plus-one-broad-oscillator alternative at any temperature. Because the physically distinct interpretation ('two interband excitations become degenerate') versus the trivial interpretation ('the fit loses a degree of freedom') is exactly what is at stake, the authors should either report fit uncertainties/correlations and demonstrate that the two-oscillator description is actually preferred at all temperatures below T_st, or soften the 'merging' wording to a documented convergence of parameters within the chosen model.
[Link to the band structure, Fig. 4] The orbital assignment of L1–L6, and specifically the claim that the L2/L3 merging signals degeneracy of the antibonding 3d_z2 branches, rests on an ad hoc level scheme in which the bonding bands are split with the Fermi level lying between them. This placement directly contradicts the cited DFT+U band structures (refs 1, 7, 10, 11), which place the bonding 3d_z2 states below the Fermi level. The paper acknowledges (section 'Link to the band structure') that the high-pressure DFT+U behavior differs from the high-temperature results, but it offers no ambient-pressure or high-temperature calculation supporting the alternative level scheme. As written, the identification of individual Lorentzians with specific interband transitions is unsupported by any calculation for the temperature range studied; the orbital-specific claim therefore goes beyond what the data alone can establish. I recommend either providing a band-structure basis (e.g., an ambient-pressure or elevated-temperature calculation, or an explicit symmetry-and-hybridization argument) for the split-bonding scheme, or rephrasing the conclusion to the defensible level of a reconstruction of the low-energy interband manifold, with the 3d_z2 assignment presented as a hypothesis to be tested.
[Experimental data and spectral-weight analysis, Eqs. (1)–(2)] The spectral-weight part of the paper is sound and is the most robust contribution. One point worth clarifying: the use of dc = 5.1 Å as the interlayer spacing enters the absolute scale of ΔKint but not the qualitative redistribution pattern, which is demonstrated independently by the frequency-resolved analysis of Fig. S3 and the cumulative curve of Fig. S2(b). I would ask only that the authors state explicitly whether the step-like low-energy gain across T_st (Fig. 2b) is robust against the choice of normalization and against the KK extrapolation procedure, since the extrapolation below 0 and above 10^6 cm^-1 is performed with the fitted model and could in principle influence the low-energy integral. A short sensitivity statement (e.g., varying the high-frequency extrapolation) would remove any doubt.

Minor objections (4)

[Fig. 3 and Fig. S5] The fitted parameter plots would benefit from error bars or, at minimum, a statement of the typical fit uncertainty on ω0 and ωp, so that the claimed convergence of L2 and L3 above T_st can be assessed against the noise level.
[Drude–Lorentz analysis, Methods] The fixed value ε∞ = 3.5 for all temperatures is an assumption that affects the absolute oscillator strengths; it would be useful to state its provenance (e.g., a high-frequency measurement or a literature value) and to mention whether any sensitivity check was performed.
[References] Reference [8] (Zhang et al., arXiv:2511.15265) is cited as an arXiv preprint; if a peer-reviewed version is available it should be cited instead, and if not the preprint status should be marked consistently.
[General notation] The paper switches between cm^-1 and eV in several places (e.g., '8000 cm^-1 (∼1 eV)'); a consistent statement of the conversion in the Methods would help readability.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Across the 544 K tilt-free transition of La3Ni2O7, optical spectral weight moves from 1–3 eV to below 1 eV and two interband excitations merge — a reconstruction of the bilayer nickel orbitals implicated in the pressurized superconducting…

The reading

The paper sets out to show that the structural transition at $T_{st}\simeq 544$ K, where La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$'s NiO$_6$ octahedra lose their tilts at ambient pressure, reorganizes the electronic structure rather than merely changing crystal symmetry. Broadband reflectivity from 15 meV to 3.2 eV reveals spectral weight moving out of excitations between 1 and 3 eV into states below 1 eV, with a step-like low-energy gain at the transition. The most telling observation is that two interband excitations, labelled L2 and L3, progressively converge and merge above $T_{st}$, which the authors read as the collapse of the splitting between the antibonding branches of the bilayer Ni $3d_{z^2}$ states. Because the interlayer coupling of exactly those states sits at the center of proposed mechanisms of superconductivity in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$, the paper argues that the tilt-free phase is a directly accessible, ambient-pressure reference for the electronic structure of the superconducting state.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pair of interband excitations labelled L2 and L3 in the paper's Drude–Lorentz fit. In the authors' assignment, both are transitions from the occupied lower bonding $3d_{z^2}$ branch to the two unoccupied antibonding branches, so their progressive convergence — resonance frequency, plasma frequency, and linewidth all becoming identical above $T_{st}\simeq 544$ K — is the signature that the antibonding splitting collapses when the octahedral tilts are suppressed. Around this pair the argument wraps two supporting probes: the spectral-weight integral $\Delta K_{int}$ computed from the differential conductivity with the interlayer spacing $d_c = 5.1$ Å, which establishes the broad 1–3 eV to below-1 eV transfer independently of the fit, and the high-temperature Raman spectra, whose tilt-shear modes (2) and (3) disappear between 543 and 545 K and whose growing Fano asymmetry couples the phonons to the electronic continuum. The fixed background dielectric constant $\epsilon_\infty = 3.5$ completes the model that tracks the oscillators consistently across the whole temperature range.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the tilt-free phase of La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ is a genuinely different electronic state of the bilayer nickel sector, not merely a symmetric version of the same metal. Differential optical conductivity shows a broadband transfer of spectral weight from 1–3 eV excitations toward below 1 eV, with the low-energy gain of $\Delta K_{int}$ stepping up markedly across $T_{st}$ while the high-energy loss is only partially compensated within the measured range. Raman tilt-shear modes (2) and (3) vanish between 543 and 545 K while acquiring Fano asymmetry, tying the electronic changes to the lattice. A Drude–Lorentz decomposition attributes the largest low-energy gain to L2 (about fivefold) and L3 (about twofold), whose resonance frequencies, plasma frequencies and linewidths converge to identical values above $T_{st}$. The authors interpret the L2/L3 merging as the degeneracy of the two antibonding $3d_{z^2}$ branches in the higher-symmetry structure, and the simultaneous hardening of L1 as an increased splitting of the bonding branches, with the Fermi level sitting between them — a level scheme that differs from published DFT+U calculations, as the paper acknowledges when it notes that pressure and temperature drive opposite electronic changes in the same nominal crystal structure. The conclusion is that the tilt-free transition reconfigures the $3d_{z^2}$ orbital sector — the interlayer-coupling degrees of freedom that orbital-selective theories tie to interlayer pairing and superconductivity.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the assignment of the fitted L2 and L3 oscillators to transitions into the two antibonding Ni $3d_{z^2}$ bands, and on the paper's working scheme for L1 — split bonding branches with the Fermi level between them, which differs from published DFT+U placements; if those assignments are wrong, the merging of L2 and L3 is a coincidence of line positions rather than a reconstruction of the $3d_{z^2}$ sector.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the L2/L3 merging restores antibonding degeneracy, then heating alone offers a working, ambient-pressure route to the tilt-free electronic structure that pressure also produces, without needing a diamond-anvil cell for this comparison.
Because the low-energy spectral-weight gain is not compensated within the measured range, the tilt-free transition reorganizes electronic states over several electronvolts, extending into the ultraviolet, so low-energy-only models capture only part of the reconstruction.
The paper's observation that heating and pressure drive opposite electronic changes at the same nominal crystal symmetry implies that octahedral tilts are not the whole story: lattice volume — contracting under pressure, expanding under heat — determines which bands sit near the Fermi level.
The combination of Raman mode extinction and the L2/L3 convergence provides an optical fingerprint of the tilt-free phase that can be tracked in repeated heating-and-cooling cycles, whose reproducibility the authors verified.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: because the two-oscillator merging is easy to measure, L2/L3 behavior could serve as an optical thermometer for tilt suppression in other bilayer nickelates, such as La4Ni3O10 or rare-earth-substituted R3Ni2O7, where high-pressure studies are harder to perform.
Editorial inference: the paper's working scheme for L1 — split bonding branches with the Fermi level between them — runs opposite to published DFT+U placements, so an orbital-resolved probe, such as temperature-dependent photoemission or resonant optical spectroscopy isolating the 3d_z2 character of L1, would be the direct test of whether that part of the assignment holds.
Editorial inference: if tilt suppression were sufficient for the electronic reconstruction relevant to superconductivity, heating toward the tilt-free phase should at least partially reproduce the strong Drude enhancement seen under pressure; the near-absence of such an enhancement suggests the superconducting electronic configuration requires the compressed lattice, not just the same crystal symm
Editorial inference: a natural next measurement is to follow L2 and L3 through the pressure-driven tilt-free transition; the paper's picture predicts they separate while L1 softens, the mirror image of the heating data, and that asymmetry, if observed, would strongly corroborate the interpretation.

Original abstract

The emergence of high-$T_c$ superconductivity in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ is intimately linked to a structural transition that suppresses the tilts of the NiO$_6$ octahedra, yet its impact on the electronic structure remains poorly understood. Here, we probe the electronic response across this tilt-free transition at $T_{st}\simeq 544$ K using broadband infrared-to-visible reflectivity at ambient pressure, covering photon energies from 15 meV to 3.2 eV. We observe a pronounced redistribution of spectral weight over an exceptionally broad energy range, with spectral weight transferred from excitations between 1 and 3 eV toward low-energy excitations below 1 eV. Most strikingly, two low-energy interband excitations progressively converge and merge upon entering the tilt-free phase, revealing a substantial reconstruction of the finite-energy electronic structure. These changes point to a reconstruction of the bilayer Ni $3d_{z^2}$-derived electronic states, whose interlayer coupling is central to proposed mechanisms of superconductivity in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$. Our results establish the tilt-free transition as a direct route to reorganizing the electronic degrees of freedom implicated in high-$T_c$ superconductivity and provide an ambient-pressure reference for the electronic structure of the superconducting state.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-01: 1 request, 5,295 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.25 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.21 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.95 · compares with prior results 0.18 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The emergence of high-$T_c$ superconductivity in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ is intimately linked to a structural transition that suppresses the tilts of the NiO$_6$ octahedra, yet its impact on the electronic structure remains poorly understood. Here, we probe the electronic response across this tilt-free transition at $T_{st}\simeq 544$ K using broadband infrared-to-visible reflectivity at ambient pressure, covering photon energies from 15 meV to 3.2 eV. We observe a pronounced redistribution of spectral weight over an exceptionally broad energy range, with spectral weight transferred from excitations between 1 and 3 eV toward low-energy excitations below 1 eV. Most strikingly, two low-energy interband excitations progressively converge and merge upon entering the tilt-free phase, revealing a substantial reconstruction of the finite-energy electronic structure. These changes point to a reconstruction of the bilayer Ni $3d_{z^2}$-derived electronic states, whose interlayer coupling is central to proposed mechanisms of superconductivity in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$. Our results establish the tilt-free transition as a direct route to reorganizing the electronic degrees of freedom implicated in high-$T_c$ superconductivity and provide an ambient-pressure reference for the electronic structure of the superconducting state.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The emergence of high-$T_c$ superconductivity in pressurized La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ is intimately linked to a structural transition that suppresses the tilts of the NiO$_6$ octahedra, yet its impact on the electronic structure remains poorly understood.	background 0.59	0.05	0.04	asserted 1.00
s1	Here, we probe the electronic response across this tilt-free transition at $T_{st}\simeq 544$ K using broadband infrared-to-visible reflectivity at ambient pressure, covering photon energies from 15 meV to 3.2 eV.	method 0.93	0.97	0.03	asserted 0.98
s2	We observe a pronounced redistribution of spectral weight over an exceptionally broad energy range, with spectral weight transferred from excitations between 1 and 3 eV toward low-energy excitations below 1 eV.	result 1.00	0.96	0.08	asserted 1.00
s3	Most strikingly, two low-energy interband excitations progressively converge and merge upon entering the tilt-free phase, revealing a substantial reconstruction of the finite-energy electronic structure.	result 1.00	0.95	0.14	asserted 1.00
s4	These changes point to a reconstruction of the bilayer Ni $3d_{z^2}$-derived electronic states, whose interlayer coupling is central to proposed mechanisms of superconductivity in La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$.	interpretation 1.00	0.71	0.24	hedged possibility 0.83
s5	Our results establish the tilt-free transition as a direct route to reorganizing the electronic degrees of freedom implicated in high-$T_c$ superconductivity and provide an ambient-pressure reference for the electronic structure of the superconducting state.	interpretation 0.98	0.83	0.91	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. High-temperature infrared and Raman spec

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Spectral weight redistribution evidences from HT spectroscopic data. (a) The differential optical conductivity

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Comparison of our optical responses

Showing 3 of the paper's 4 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:2609.40139 by the authors.

References

Works cited (22)

[1]

H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493 (2023)

View on Pith 2023
[2]

G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrys- talline La3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. X14, 011040 (2024)

View on Pith 2024
[3]

Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smid- man, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La 3Ni2O7−δ, Nat. Phys.20, 1269 (2024)

View on Pith 2024
[4]

J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H. Mao, and M. Wang, Identification of superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 under high pressure up to 100 GPa, Nat. Scie. Rev.12, 10 (2025)

View on Pith 2025
[5]

F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y.-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Luo, N. Hi- rao, T. Matsuoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Bulk super- conductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, Nature649, 871 (2026)

View on Pith 2026
[6]

L. Wang, Y. Li, S.-Y. Xie, F. Liu, H. Sun, C. Huang, Y. Gao, T. Nakagawa, B. Fu, B. Dong, Z. Cao, R. Yu, S. I. Kawaguchi, H. Kadobayashi, M. Wang, C. Jin, H.- K. Mao, and H. Liu, Structure Responsible for the Su- perconducting State in La 3Ni2O7 at High-Pressure and Low-Temperature Conditions, J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 7506 (2024)

View on Pith 2024
[7]

B. Geisler, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hen- nig, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Structural transitions, octa- hedral rotations, and electronic properties of A 3Ni2O7 rare-earth nickelates under high pressure, npj Quant. Mat.9, 38 (2024)

View on Pith 2024
[8]

H. Zhang, J. Zhang, M. Huo, J. Chen, D. Hu, D.-X. Yao, H. Sun, K. Cao, and M. Wang, Identifying the structure of La 3Ni2O7 in the pressurized superconducting state, ArXiv , 2511.15265 (2025)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[9]

B. Michon, Y. Yu, B. D’Al` o, E. Stellino, G. N´ emeth, B. Wang, J. Sun, J. Cheng, P. Postorino, F. Borondics, and F. Capitani, Metallic crossover through the tilt-free transition in La3Ni2O7 at high pressure and temperature, Phys. Rev. B114, L140102 (2026)

View on Pith 2026
[10]

B. Geisler, L. Fanfarillo, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hennig, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Optical properties and electronic correlations in La3Ni2O7 bilayer nickelates under high pressure, npj Quantum Mater.9, 89 (2024)

View on Pith 2024
[11]

J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y. Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, and X. J. Zhou, Orbital-dependent elec- tron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Nat. Commun.15, 4373 (2024)

View on Pith 2024
[12]

Y. Kobayashi, S. Taniguchi, M. Kasai, M. Sato, T. Nish- ioka, and M. Kontani, Transport and Magnetic Proper- ties of La 3Ni2O7−δ and La4Ni3O10−δ, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3978 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[13]

H. Sasaki, H. Harashina, S. Taniguchi, M. Kasai, Y. Kobayashi, M. Sato, T. Kobayashi, T. Ikeda, M. Takata, and M. Sakata, Structural Studies on the Phase Transition of La3Ni2O6.92 at about 550 K, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.66, 1693 (1997)

View on Pith 1997
[14]

M. Zinkevich, N. Solak, H. Nitsche, M. Ahrens, and F. Aldinger, Stability and thermodynamic functions of lanthanum nickelates, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 438, 92 (2007)

View on Pith 2007
[15]

See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details of crystal growth, HT reflectivity and Raman setups, data analysis and fitting, and addi- tional figures

View on Pith
[16]

U. Fano, Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensi- ties and Phase Shifts, Phys. Rev.124, 1866 (1961)

View on Pith 1961
[17]

T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Inelastic light scatter- ing from correlated electrons, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 175 (2007)

View on Pith 2007
[18]

B. Michon, A. B. Kuzmenko, M. K. Tran, B. McElfresh, S. Komiya, S. Ono, S. Uchida, and D. van der Marel, Spectral weight of hole-doped cuprates across the pseu- dogap critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 043125 (2021)

View on Pith 2021
[19]

A. B. Kuzmenko, Kramers–Kronig constrained varia- tional analysis of optical spectra, Rev. Sci. Instrum.76, 083108 (2005)

View on Pith 2005
[20]

H. Yang and Y.-H. Zhang, Magnetism and superconduc- tivity in bilayer nickelate, Phys. Rev. B114, L171104 (2026). Supplementary: Electronic Reconstruction across the Tilt-Free Transition in La 3Ni2O7 Mengjie Kong, 1, 2 Gergely N´ emeth,1 Yingpeng Yu, 3, 4 Bosen Wang,3, 4 Jianping Sun,3, 4 Jinguang Cheng, 3, 4 Ferenc Borondics, 1 and Bastien Michon 1, 5,∗ ...

View on Pith 2026
[21]

F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y.-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Luo, N. Hi- rao, T. Matsuoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Bulk supercon- ductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crys- tals, Nature649, 871 (2026)

View on Pith 2026
[22]

A. B. Kuzmenko, Kramers–Kronig constrained variational analysis of optical spectra, Rev. Sci. Instrum.76, 083108 (2005). 4 SECTION 2. ADDITIONAL DATA AND ANALYSIS 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000−0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 561K 573K 598K 623K 673K 723K s2 (kS·cm-1) wave number (cm-1) 296K 323K 348K 373K 423K 448K 473K 498K 523K 530K 536K 548K 0.0...

View on Pith 2005

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493 (2023)

View on Pith 2023

[2] [2]

G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrys- talline La3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. X14, 011040 (2024)

View on Pith 2024

[3] [3]

Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smid- man, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La 3Ni2O7−δ, Nat. Phys.20, 1269 (2024)

View on Pith 2024

[4] [4]

J. Li, D. Peng, P. Ma, H. Zhang, Z. Xing, X. Huang, C. Huang, M. Huo, D. Hu, Z. Dong, X. Chen, T. Xie, H. Dong, H. Sun, Q. Zeng, H. Mao, and M. Wang, Identification of superconductivity in bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 under high pressure up to 100 GPa, Nat. Scie. Rev.12, 10 (2025)

View on Pith 2025

[5] [5]

F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y.-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Luo, N. Hi- rao, T. Matsuoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Bulk super- conductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crystals, Nature649, 871 (2026)

View on Pith 2026

[6] [6]

L. Wang, Y. Li, S.-Y. Xie, F. Liu, H. Sun, C. Huang, Y. Gao, T. Nakagawa, B. Fu, B. Dong, Z. Cao, R. Yu, S. I. Kawaguchi, H. Kadobayashi, M. Wang, C. Jin, H.- K. Mao, and H. Liu, Structure Responsible for the Su- perconducting State in La 3Ni2O7 at High-Pressure and Low-Temperature Conditions, J. Am. Chem. Soc.146, 7506 (2024)

View on Pith 2024

[7] [7]

B. Geisler, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hen- nig, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Structural transitions, octa- hedral rotations, and electronic properties of A 3Ni2O7 rare-earth nickelates under high pressure, npj Quant. Mat.9, 38 (2024)

View on Pith 2024

[8] [8]

H. Zhang, J. Zhang, M. Huo, J. Chen, D. Hu, D.-X. Yao, H. Sun, K. Cao, and M. Wang, Identifying the structure of La 3Ni2O7 in the pressurized superconducting state, ArXiv , 2511.15265 (2025)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[9] [9]

B. Michon, Y. Yu, B. D’Al` o, E. Stellino, G. N´ emeth, B. Wang, J. Sun, J. Cheng, P. Postorino, F. Borondics, and F. Capitani, Metallic crossover through the tilt-free transition in La3Ni2O7 at high pressure and temperature, Phys. Rev. B114, L140102 (2026)

View on Pith 2026

[10] [10]

B. Geisler, L. Fanfarillo, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hennig, and P. J. Hirschfeld, Optical properties and electronic correlations in La3Ni2O7 bilayer nickelates under high pressure, npj Quantum Mater.9, 89 (2024)

View on Pith 2024

[11] [11]

J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y. Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, and X. J. Zhou, Orbital-dependent elec- tron correlation in double-layer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Nat. Commun.15, 4373 (2024)

View on Pith 2024

[12] [12]

Y. Kobayashi, S. Taniguchi, M. Kasai, M. Sato, T. Nish- ioka, and M. Kontani, Transport and Magnetic Proper- ties of La 3Ni2O7−δ and La4Ni3O10−δ, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 3978 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[13] [13]

H. Sasaki, H. Harashina, S. Taniguchi, M. Kasai, Y. Kobayashi, M. Sato, T. Kobayashi, T. Ikeda, M. Takata, and M. Sakata, Structural Studies on the Phase Transition of La3Ni2O6.92 at about 550 K, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.66, 1693 (1997)

View on Pith 1997

[14] [14]

M. Zinkevich, N. Solak, H. Nitsche, M. Ahrens, and F. Aldinger, Stability and thermodynamic functions of lanthanum nickelates, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 438, 92 (2007)

View on Pith 2007

[15] [15]

See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details of crystal growth, HT reflectivity and Raman setups, data analysis and fitting, and addi- tional figures

View on Pith

[16] [16]

U. Fano, Effects of Configuration Interaction on Intensi- ties and Phase Shifts, Phys. Rev.124, 1866 (1961)

View on Pith 1961

[17] [17]

T. P. Devereaux and R. Hackl, Inelastic light scatter- ing from correlated electrons, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 175 (2007)

View on Pith 2007

[18] [18]

B. Michon, A. B. Kuzmenko, M. K. Tran, B. McElfresh, S. Komiya, S. Ono, S. Uchida, and D. van der Marel, Spectral weight of hole-doped cuprates across the pseu- dogap critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett.3, 043125 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

[19] [19]

A. B. Kuzmenko, Kramers–Kronig constrained varia- tional analysis of optical spectra, Rev. Sci. Instrum.76, 083108 (2005)

View on Pith 2005

[20] [20]

H. Yang and Y.-H. Zhang, Magnetism and superconduc- tivity in bilayer nickelate, Phys. Rev. B114, L171104 (2026). Supplementary: Electronic Reconstruction across the Tilt-Free Transition in La 3Ni2O7 Mengjie Kong, 1, 2 Gergely N´ emeth,1 Yingpeng Yu, 3, 4 Bosen Wang,3, 4 Jianping Sun,3, 4 Jinguang Cheng, 3, 4 Ferenc Borondics, 1 and Bastien Michon 1, 5,∗ ...

View on Pith 2026

[21] [21]

F. Li, Z. Xing, D. Peng, J. Dou, N. Guo, L. Ma, Y. Zhang, L. Wang, J. Luo, J. Yang, J. Zhang, T. Chang, Y.-S. Chen, W. Cai, J. Cheng, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, T. Luo, N. Hi- rao, T. Matsuoka, H. Kadobayashi, Z. Zeng, Q. Zheng, R. Zhou, Q. Zeng, X. Tao, and J. Zhang, Bulk supercon- ductivity up to 96 K in pressurized nickelate single crys- tals, Nature649, 871 (2026)

View on Pith 2026

[22] [22]

A. B. Kuzmenko, Kramers–Kronig constrained variational analysis of optical spectra, Rev. Sci. Instrum.76, 083108 (2005). 4 SECTION 2. ADDITIONAL DATA AND ANALYSIS 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000−0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 561K 573K 598K 623K 673K 723K s2 (kS·cm-1) wave number (cm-1) 296K 323K 348K 373K 423K 448K 473K 498K 523K 530K 536K 548K 0.0...

View on Pith 2005