The Scalar MSW Effect: Compact analytical formulas for neutrino oscillations with large matter effects, including $\mu -\mu$ and $\tau -\tau$ dominant matter potentials

Andreas Lund; Sandhya Choubey

REVIEW

The Scalar MSW Effect: Compact analytical formulas for neutrino oscillations with large matter effects, including $\mu -\mu$ and $\tau -\tau$ dominant matter potentials

Sandhya Choubey, Andreas Lund

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 1 Oct 2026 · 44 references

Pith's verdict: Genuinely useful technical step (the parameterization criterion is the real contribution, and the δm_ee mapping is excellent), but the μμ/ττ SMSW resonance claims overreach: the ττ resonance sits exactly where the paper's own accuracy benchmark fails, and the effect is weak everywhere else.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 2, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2610.02107 (version 1)

Pith IDC3YZCUUF, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationAndreas Lund, Sandhya Choubey. "The Scalar MSW Effect: Compact analytical formulas for neutrino oscillations with large matter effects, including $\mu -\mu$ and $\tau -\tau$ dominant matter potentials." arXiv:2610.02107 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C3YZCUUF

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

The new thing here is the parameterization criterion for the Jacobi method: leftmost Euler rotation must be a continuous symmetry of the matter potential, rightmost must be R12. That is a clean organizing insight, and it is what makes the μμ and ττ effective mappings possible at all. The derivations are laid out step by step, the only neglected element scales with Δm21² and enters quadratically, and the accuracy is benchmarked honestly against exact numerical diagonalization. For δm_ee, which includes ACC fully, errors are sub-1% for JUNO, Hyper-K, ESSnuSB and up to ~7 GeV at DUNE. That part is solid and immediately useful, and the resonance conditions come from the mappings, not from fits.

The soft spot is the headline: that all three diagonal couplings give an energy-independent SMSW resonance. For ττ, plugging Tab. 1 (θτ23=43.97°) into Eq. (4.55) at ml=0 puts the positive root at δm23+_ττ ≈ -1.6e-3 eV, a negative δm_ττ — precisely the region the Fig. 5 discussion flags as failing the 1% target ("the exception of negative values δmττ with low values ml"). So the prediction for where the effect would appear is in territory where the formulas miss their own benchmark. And even where accuracy holds, the signature is weak: θτ23 is near-maximal, so the excursion is small — the paper itself calls the analogous A_ττ resonance "insignificant." The μμ case is safer at JUNO, but at Hyper-K/ESSnuSB energies ACC ~ 2-3e-4 eV² is comparable to the SNSI potential, so energy independence is not realized there either; the perturbative patch restores sub-1% mainly for JUNO, and the DUNE combination fails for E>5 GeV. All of this is acknowledged in the text (b267, b326, b397), but the abstract's claim that all three couplings yield an energy-independent SMSW effect runs ahead of what the accuracy study shows.

The resonance locations also depend on the absolute mass scale m1, which is loosely bounded, so sharp predictions are limited.

Who gets value: phenomenological neutrino physicists hunting SNSI at JUNO/DUNE/Hyper-K. The δm_ee mapping and the parameterization criterion are worth having; the μμ/ττ resonance claims need tempering, and the ττ negative-δm region needs an explicit validity check.

Recommendation: yes, send it to peer review — it is technically serious and deserves referee time — but the referee should require the authors to reconcile the μμ/ττ resonance predictions with their own accuracy benchmarks before the SMSW claim is stated as a result for all three couplings.

Referee report

Significance

If the claimed results hold, the paper provides a genuinely useful technical extension: the parameterization criterion in Sec. 3 (leftmost rotation as a symmetry of the matter potential, rightmost rotation R12) is elegant and likely of independent interest, and the derivations in Secs. 2-4 are laid out step by step with the only approximation being the neglect of the small off-diagonal elements (4.9), (4.29), (4.47), which enter quadratically via the Jacobi convergence argument. The accuracy benchmarks are honest and reproducible, and the limitations (single dominant diagonal element, A_CC neglected for mu-mu and tau-tau) are stated explicitly by the authors (b267, b326, b397). The delta-m_ee sector is a solid product: sub-1% accuracy with full A_CC across JUNO, Hyper-K, and ESSnuSB. However, the headline SMSW claim for the mu-mu and tau-tau couplings is not validated where the resonances would actually appear: the tau-tau resonance (Eq. 4.55) sits at negative delta-m_tautau, in precisely the region the paper's own Fig.

Major objections (2)

[Sec. 4.3, Eq. (4.55), Fig. 5] The genuine (positive-root) tau-tau SMSW resonance is not validated where it would occur. Using the Tab. 1 value theta^tau_23 = 43.97 deg (so cos 2 theta^tau_23 ~ 0.036), Delta_tau-tau ~ 2.5e-3 eV^2, and M^tau_+ ~ 0.028 eV at m_l = 0, Eq. (4.55) gives the genuine root delta-m23,+_tautau ~ -1.6e-3 eV, i.e. a negative delta-m_tautau. The text following Fig. 5 states that the first-order-corrected formulas remain well below 1% 'with the exception of negative values delta-m_tautau with low values m_l', and m_l = 0 is the default in Figs. 1, 4, and 5. The central tau-tau SMSW claim is therefore unvalidated exactly at the resonance point; the authors should either extend the accuracy benchmark to the resonance region (e.g. with higher-order corrections or a dedicated numerical check at that parameter point) or visibly temper the claim. The issue is compounded by the physical weakness of the effect: theta^tau_23 is nearly maximal, so the resonant excursion of the effective angle is small, and Sec. 3.2 itself calls the analogous A_tau-tau resonance 'insignificant'.
[Secs. 4.2, 4.3, and 6; Fig. 1] The abstract's claim that the mu-mu and tau-tau couplings give an 'energy independent resonant enhancement' is realized only where A_CC is negligible, and this condition is not met where the effects would be observable. The authors acknowledge neglecting A_CC (Secs. 4.2 and 4.3, and b397), but the consequence is not pursued quantitatively: at the long-baseline experiments considered, A_CC ~ 2-3e-4 eV^2 at E ~ 1 GeV is comparable to A^S_mumu ~ delta-m_mumu (m^mu_+ + m_3) ~ 1.4e-4 eV^2, so the mu-mu resonance is not energy-independent there; the good Hyper-K/ESSnuSB accuracy in Fig. 1 is obtained only by switching to the A_CC-corrected probability formulas of Ref. [29], and for DUNE the accuracy degrades above E ~ 5 GeV (b306, Fig. 4). I ask the authors to specify at which (E, L, density) the mu-mu and tau-tau SMSW relations are simultaneously accurate and energy-independent, or to weaken the 'energy independent' phrasing in the abstract to match what is actually established. The authors acknowledge this: “The noteworthy difference here is that we have not accounted for the standard potential,A CC , which considerably limits the applicability of the conclusions we draw.”

Minor objections (4)

[Eq. (4.38) and following text] The label 'delta-m13_mumu' in Eq. (4.38) appears to be a typo for a 2-3-sector quantity (the text derives the 23 resonance), and the sentence after Eq. (4.55) refers to 'theta^mu_23' where the tau case is meant.
[Fig. 5 caption] The caption of Fig. 5 says 'Absolute error' while Eq. (5.1) and the surrounding text define a relative error; please unify the terminology.
[Fig. 1] The legend of Fig. 1 lists 'delta-m_mumu (P_mu e)' twice in the Hyper-K, ESSnuSB, and DUNE panels, with the second entry presumably intended to label the first-order-corrected curves.
[Various] Typos: 'Converesely' in Sec. 3.2, 'we further work employ' in Sec. 5, 'parametrizating' in Sec. 1, and 'Is in the previous delta-m_ee and delta-m_mumu cases' at the start of Sec. 4.3.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

Analytical neutrino oscillation formulas are derived for scalar non-standard interactions in all three diagonal flavor channels, revealing an energy-independent scalar MSW resonance.

The reading

Neutrinos change flavor as they travel, and the matter they pass through modifies this. The usual modification, the MSW effect, depends on energy because it comes from a force that cares about energy. But a hypothetical scalar interaction, mediated by a new particle, would shift the neutrino's effective mass in a way that does not depend on energy. This paper builds a mathematical tool to handle such effects. The authors generalize a known method, Jacobi diagonalization, which rotates the neutrino Hamiltonian to make it almost diagonal in matter. The key trick is to choose how to parameterize the mixing matrix based on which flavor (electron, muon, or tau) the new interaction touches. They work out compact formulas for the effective mixing angles and mass-squared differences in each of the three single-flavor cases, and give the condition under which each mixing angle becomes resonantly large. They find that all three diagonal scalar couplings can cause such a resonance, which they call the scalar MSW (SMSW) effect. Because it is energy-independent, it would not appear as a spectral bump; instead it would be uncovered by comparing oscillations at different matter densities. The formulas for the electron-electron case are highly accurate, because the standard matter potential is fully included. The muon-muon and tau-tau cases require ignoring that standard potential and then adding perturbative corrections, which work well for the JUNO experiment but less well for DUNE at high energy.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that all three single diagonal scalar non-standard interaction couplings, δm_ee, δm_μμ and δm_ττ, give rise to a scalar MSW (SMSW) effect, an energy-independent resonant enhancement of the neutrino mixing angle analogous to the standard MSW effect (abstract, sentence b6). The operative resonance condition for the electron case, Eq. (4.18), is δm13,±_ee = -M+ ± sqrt(M+^2 + Δee cos 2θ13 - ACC), which admits a resonant root even when ACC = 0; analogous conditions are given for μμ (Eqs. 4.35, 4.37) and ττ (Eqs. 4.53, 4.55). If correct, the effective parameter mappings of Sec. 4 accurately describe three-flavor oscillations under a single large diagonal SNSI coupling, and the SMSW resonance is a distinctive, density-comparison-only signature.

Load-bearing premise

For the μμ and ττ cases, the standard charged-current matter potential ACC is assumed negligible (Secs. 4.2, 4.3; acknowledged in sentences b267 and b326 and in Sec. 6, b397: the Jacobi method can only be applied when there is exactly one dominant element in the matter potential matrix). Since ACC sits in the e-e element while δm_μμ and δm_ττ sit in other diagonal elements, the method cannot include both at once. If ACC is not subdominant, which is the case for long-baseline experiments at high energy, the derived SMSW resonance conditions and formulas for μμ and ττ lose validity. The first-order perturbative patch restores sub-1% accuracy mainly for JUNO, and the combination with the probability formulas of Ref. [29] works for Hyper-K and ESSnuSB but fails for DUNE at E > 5 GeV (sentence b306, Fig. 4). This is a structural limitation, distinct from the central claim about the existence of the resonance.

Original abstract

Deriving simple and accurate three-flavor neutrino oscillation probability formulas in matter is critical for understanding the phenomenology of upcoming experiments. In this article, we extend the Jacobi diagonalization method for deriving effective parameter mappings for neutrino oscillations in matter. The key insight behind the extension is to purposefully parameterize the mixing matrix, $U_{\text{PMNS}}$, using particular arrangements of Euler rotations. This novel extension allows for deriving simple and accurate effective mixing parameter mappings for exotic types of matter potentials. First, we revisit the Jacobi diagonalization method for neutrino oscillations with standard matter effects and use this to demonstrate our generalization. Subsequently, we apply the Jacobi diagonalization method to scalar non-standard interactions (SNSI) and derive effective parameter mappings for all three single diagonal coupling cases. The resulting formulas reveal that all diagonal SNSI couplings could give rise to a scalar MSW (SMSW) effect, that is an energy independent resonant enhancement analogous to the MSW effect. Finally, we study the accuracy of the derived SNSI formulas for various contemporary and upcoming experiments. For $\delta m_{ee}$, the accuracy is excellent for all considered experiments. For $\delta m_{\mu\mu}$ and $\delta m_{\tau \tau}$ the accuracy is worse since $A_{CC}$ must be neglected, and first order perturbative corrections are applied to amend this.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-02: 1 request, 7,616 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.13 · states limitation 0.94 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.43 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Deriving simple and accurate three-flavor neutrino oscillation probability formulas in matter is critical for understanding the phenomenology of upcoming experiments. In this article, we extend the Jacobi diagonalization method for deriving effective parameter mappings for neutrino oscillations in matter. The key insight behind the extension is to purposefully parameterize the mixing matrix, $U_{\text{PMNS}}$, using particular arrangements of Euler rotations. This novel extension allows for deriving simple and accurate effective mixing parameter mappings for exotic types of matter potentials. First, we revisit the Jacobi diagonalization method for neutrino oscillations with standard matter effects and use this to demonstrate our generalization. Subsequently, we apply the Jacobi diagonalization method to scalar non-standard interactions (SNSI) and derive effective parameter mappings for all three single diagonal coupling cases. The resulting formulas reveal that all diagonal SNSI couplings could give rise to a scalar MSW (SMSW) effect, that is an energy independent resonant enhancement analogous to the MSW effect. Finally, we study the accuracy of the derived SNSI formulas for various contemporary and upcoming experiments. For $\delta m_{ee}$, the accuracy is excellent for all considered experiments. For $\delta m_{\mu\mu}$ and $\delta m_{\tau \tau}$ the accuracy is worse since $A_{CC}$ must be neglected, and first order perturbative corrections are applied to amend this.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Deriving simple and accurate three-flavor neutrino oscillation probability formulas in matter is critical for understanding the phenomenology of upcoming experiments.	background 1.00	0.06	0.03	asserted 1.00
s1	In this article, we extend the Jacobi diagonalization method for deriving effective parameter mappings for neutrino oscillations in matter.	contribution 0.94	0.87	0.03	asserted 0.98
s2	The key insight behind the extension is to purposefully parameterize the mixing matrix, $U_{\text{PMNS}}$, using particular arrangements of Euler rotations.	method 0.88	0.80	0.04	asserted 1.00
s3	This novel extension allows for deriving simple and accurate effective mixing parameter mappings for exotic types of matter potentials.	contribution 0.92	0.85	0.16	asserted 0.90
s4	First, we revisit the Jacobi diagonalization method for neutrino oscillations with standard matter effects and use this to demonstrate our generalization.	method 0.94	0.87	0.02	asserted 0.98
s5	Subsequently, we apply the Jacobi diagonalization method to scalar non-standard interactions (SNSI) and derive effective parameter mappings for all three single diagonal coupling cases.	method 0.54	0.96	0.07	asserted 1.00
s6	The resulting formulas reveal that all diagonal SNSI couplings could give rise to a scalar MSW (SMSW) effect, that is an energy independent resonant enhancement analogous to the MSW effect.	result 0.71	0.92	0.69	hedged possibility 0.93
s7	Finally, we study the accuracy of the derived SNSI formulas for various contemporary and upcoming experiments.	contribution 0.65	0.95	0.04	asserted 0.71
s8	For $\delta m_{ee}$, the accuracy is excellent for all considered experiments.	result 1.00	0.93	0.07	asserted 1.00
s9	For $\delta m_{\mu\mu}$ and $\delta m_{\tau \tau}$ the accuracy is worse since $A_{CC}$ must be neglected, and first order perturbative corrections are applied to amend this.	limitation 0.66	0.93	0.06	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.79 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** Relative error in the analytically obtained probability formulas using effective parameter mappings from Sec. 4 for JUNO, Hyper-Kamiokande, ESSnuSB and DUNE experiments. In all panels we have taken the standard oscillation parameter values from Nufit 6.0 and assumed normal mass ordering. The SNSI parameter values taken are δmαα/ρ = 10−3 eV g/cm3 and m1 = 0, where α = e, µ, τ . We consider a single δmαα at a time. For the long-baseline experiments, the solid lines are computed using the probability formula in Eq. (5.2) while for the dashed lines we have used the formulas from Ref.…

**Figure 2.** Relative error of the resulting formulas from Sec. 4 as a function of energy and baseline. For the SNSI parameters we have taken δM = diag(δmee, 0, 0) with δmee = 2.45 × 10−3 eV and ml = 0 eV, and for the standard oscillation parameters we take the Nufit 6.0 values. We mark out the JUNO, Hyper-Kamiokande, ESSnuSB and DUNE experiments for reference. Although the error is shown in terms of |Pee|, which is not strictly applicable to the long-baseline experiments, the other |Pαβ| have similar errors. accordance with the parameter mappings of our article. We show the resulting relative…

**Figure 3.** Relative error of the resulting formulas from Sec. 4.1 applied to |Pee|, displayed as a function of the SNSI parameters δmee and ml . We here assume E = 3 MeV and L = 52.5 km, corresponding to the JUNO experiment. The corresponding plots for δmµµ and δmτ τ are shown below in

**Figure 4.** Relative error of the effective parameter mappings from Sec. 4.2 and 4.3 computed on a two-dimensional grid as function of energy, E, and baseline, L. This accuracy is compared between when these 0th order formulas are applied directly as compared to when the first order corrections from equations (C.9)–(C.14) are also accounted for. We have taken δmαα = 2.45 × 10−3 eV, ml = 0 eV, and the Nufit 6.0 values for the standard oscillation parameters range of baselines and energies, which is in stark contrast to the remarkably accurate δM = diag(δmee, 0, 0) case. Presumably, this…

**Figure 5.** Absolute error of the resulting formulas from Sec. 4 as a function of δmµµ or δmτ τ , and ml . The left panels are computed using only the 0th order expressions, whereas the right panels also add the first order corrections from equations (C.9)–(C.14). We have assumed a baseline of L = 52.5 km and an energy of E = 3 MeV. of the general 0th order effective parameters, which could either be taken from Sec. 3, from Sec. 4 or from other conceivable scenario where ACC has been neglected. In

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.02107 by the authors.

References

Works cited (44)

[29]

I. Martinez-Soler and H. Minakata,Perturbing Neutrino Oscillations Around the Solar Resonance,PTEP2019(2019) 073B07 [1904.07853]. [30]Hyper-Kamiokandecollaboration,Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report,1805.04163. [31]ESSnuSBcollaboration,The ESSnuSB Design Study: Overview and Future Prospects, Universe9(2023) 347 [2303.17356]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[1]

I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J.a.P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP 12(2024) 216 [2410.05380]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[2]

E. Schr¨ odinger,Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem,Annalen Phys.384(1926) 361

View on Pith 1926
[3]

J.J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern Quantum Mechanics, Quantum physics, quantum information and quantum computation, Cambridge University Press, 3 ed. (10, 2020), 10.1017/9781108587280

View on Pith doi:10.1017/9781108587280 2020
[4]

M. Freund,Analytic approximations for three neutrino oscillation parameters and probabilities in matter,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 053003 [hep-ph/0103300]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[5]

E.K. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson and T. Schwetz,Series expansions for three flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter,JHEP04(2004) 078 [hep-ph/0402175]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[6]

H. Minakata and S.J. Parke,Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,JHEP01(2016) 180 [1505.01826]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[7]

Y.-F. Li, J. Zhang, S. Zhou and J.-y. Zhu,Looking into Analytical Approximations for Three-flavor Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,JHEP12(2016) 109 [1610.04133]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[8]

M.E. Chaves, D.R. Gratieri and O.L.G. Peres,Improvements on perturbative oscillation formulas including non-standard neutrino interactions,J. Phys. G48(2020) 015001 [1810.04979]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[9]

C.G.J. Jacobi, ¨Uber ein leichtes verfahren die in der theorie der s¨ acularst¨ orungen vorkommenden gleichungen numerisch aufzul¨ osen,Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik30(1845) 51

View on Pith
[10]

M. Honda, Y. Kao, N. Okamura and T. Takeuchi,A Simple parameterization of matter effects on neutrino oscillations,hep-ph/0602115

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[11]

M. Honda, N. Okamura and T. Takeuchi,Matter Effect on Neutrino Oscillations from the violation of Universality in Neutrino Neutral Current Interactions,hep-ph/0603268

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[12]

S.K. Agarwalla, Y. Kao and T. Takeuchi,Analytical approximation of the neutrino oscillation matter effects at largeθ 13,JHEP04(2014) 047 [1302.6773]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014
[13]

M. Blennow and A.Y. Smirnov,Neutrino propagation in matter,Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013(2013) 972485 [1306.2903]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[14]

P.B. Denton, H. Minakata and S.J. Parke,Compact Perturbative Expressions For Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,JHEP06(2016) 051 [1604.08167]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[15]

S.-F. Ge and A.Y. Smirnov,Non-standard interactions and the CP phase measurements in neutrino oscillations at low energies,JHEP10(2016) 138 [1607.08513]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[16]

A. Ioannisian and S. Pokorski,Three Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Lett. B782 (2018) 641 [1801.10488]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[17]

P.B. Denton, S.J. Parke and X. Zhang,Rotations Versus Perturbative Expansions for Calculating Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 033001 [1806.01277]. – 46 – [18]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018
[19]

H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing,On the parametrization of flavor mixing in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 594 [hep-ph/9708366]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998
[20]

H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing,How to describe neutrino mixing and CP violation,Phys. Lett. B 517(2001) 363 [hep-ph/0103242]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001
[21]

W. Rodejohann and J.W.F. Valle,Symmetrical Parametrizations of the Lepton Mixing Matrix,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 073011 [1108.3484]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[22]

P.B. Denton and R. Pestes,The impact of different parameterizations on the interpretation of CP violation in neutrino oscillations,JHEP05(2021) 139 [2006.09384]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[23]

A. Gupta, D. Majumdar and S. Prakash,Neutrino oscillation measurements with KamLAND and JUNO in the presence of scalar NSI,Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025) 102011 [2306.07343]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[24]

D.K. Singha, R. Majhi, L. Panda, M. Ghosh and R. Mohanta,Study of scalar nonstandard interaction at the Protvino to super-ORCA experiment,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 095038 [2308.10789]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[25]

P.B. Denton, A. Giarnetti and D. Meloni,How to identify different new neutrino oscillation physics scenarios at DUNE,JHEP02(2023) 210 [2210.00109]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[26]

D. Bezboruah, D.S. Chattopadhyay, A. Medhi, A. Sarker and M.M. Devi,Neutrino oscillations in presence of diagonal elements of scalar NSI: an analytic approach,JHEP12 (2025) 222 [2410.05250]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[27]

P.B. Denton, A. Giarnetti and D. Meloni,Solar neutrinos and the strongest oscillation constraints on scalar NSI,JHEP01(2025) 097 [2409.15411]. [28]JUNOcollaboration,Sub-percent precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with JUNO,Chin. Phys. C46(2022) 123001 [2204.13249]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[32]

C. Giunti and C.W. Kim,Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Oxford University Press (03, 2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508717.001.0001

View on Pith doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508717.001.0001 2007
[33]

H. Nunokawa, S.J. Parke and R. Zukanovich Funchal,Another possible way to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 013009 [hep-ph/0503283]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005
[34]

S. Parke,What is∆m 2 ee ?,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 053008 [1601.07464]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016
[35]

A. Sch¨ onhage,Zur Konvergenz des Jacobi-Verfahrens,Numerische Mathematik3(1961) 374

View on Pith 1961
[36]

J.H. Wilkinson,Note on the quadratic convergence of the cyclic Jacobi process,Numerische Mathematik4(1962) 296

View on Pith 1962
[37]

P.I. Krastev and S.T. Petcov,Resonance Amplification and t Violation Effects in Three Neutrino Oscillations in the Earth,Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 84

View on Pith 1988
[38]

S. Toshev,On T violation in matter neutrino oscillations,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 455. – 47 –

View on Pith 1991
[39]

E.K. Akhmedov,Neutrino physics, inICTP Summer School in Particle Physics, pp. 103–164, 6, 1999 [hep-ph/0001264]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[40]

P.B. Denton and S.J. Parke,Parameter symmetries of neutrino oscillations in vacuum, matter, and approximation schemes,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 013002 [2106.12436]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[41]

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and T. Li,Explaining(g−2) µ,e, the KOTO anomaly and the MiniBooNE excess in an extended Higgs model with sterile neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 055017 [2006.01319]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[42]

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, K.J. Kelly, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma,Non-standard neutrino interactions mediated by a light scalar at DUNE,JHEP07(2024) 213 [2401.02107]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[43]

B. Dutta, A. Karthikeyan, N. Mishra, Y. Porto and L.E. Strigari,Scalar non-standard neutrino interactions in Galactic supernovae,2508.16558

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[44]

S.-F. Ge and S.J. Parke,Scalar Nonstandard Interactions in Neutrino Oscillation,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 211801 [1812.08376]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[45]

S. Choubey and A. Lund,Neutrino mass ordering in JUNO at risk from scalar NSI induced resonance,2602.05564

View on Pith arXiv
[46]

T. Ohlsson,Status of non-standard neutrino interactions,Rept. Prog. Phys.76(2013) 044201 [1209.2710]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013
[47]

P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J.P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08 (2023) 032 [2305.07698]. [48]DUNEcollaboration,Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) Near Detector Conceptual Design Report,Instruments5(2021) 31 [2103.13910]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[49]

H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing,Mass and flavor mixing schemes of quarks and leptons,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.45(2000) 1 [hep-ph/9912358]. – 48 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [29]

I. Martinez-Soler and H. Minakata,Perturbing Neutrino Oscillations Around the Solar Resonance,PTEP2019(2019) 073B07 [1904.07853]. [30]Hyper-Kamiokandecollaboration,Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report,1805.04163. [31]ESSnuSBcollaboration,The ESSnuSB Design Study: Overview and Future Prospects, Universe9(2023) 347 [2303.17356]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[2] [1]

I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J.a.P. Pinheiro and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,JHEP 12(2024) 216 [2410.05380]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[3] [2]

E. Schr¨ odinger,Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem,Annalen Phys.384(1926) 361

View on Pith 1926

[4] [3]

J.J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano,Modern Quantum Mechanics, Quantum physics, quantum information and quantum computation, Cambridge University Press, 3 ed. (10, 2020), 10.1017/9781108587280

View on Pith doi:10.1017/9781108587280 2020

[5] [4]

M. Freund,Analytic approximations for three neutrino oscillation parameters and probabilities in matter,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 053003 [hep-ph/0103300]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[6] [5]

E.K. Akhmedov, R. Johansson, M. Lindner, T. Ohlsson and T. Schwetz,Series expansions for three flavor neutrino oscillation probabilities in matter,JHEP04(2004) 078 [hep-ph/0402175]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[7] [6]

H. Minakata and S.J. Parke,Simple and Compact Expressions for Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,JHEP01(2016) 180 [1505.01826]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[8] [7]

Y.-F. Li, J. Zhang, S. Zhou and J.-y. Zhu,Looking into Analytical Approximations for Three-flavor Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,JHEP12(2016) 109 [1610.04133]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[9] [8]

M.E. Chaves, D.R. Gratieri and O.L.G. Peres,Improvements on perturbative oscillation formulas including non-standard neutrino interactions,J. Phys. G48(2020) 015001 [1810.04979]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[10] [9]

C.G.J. Jacobi, ¨Uber ein leichtes verfahren die in der theorie der s¨ acularst¨ orungen vorkommenden gleichungen numerisch aufzul¨ osen,Journal f¨ ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik30(1845) 51

View on Pith

[11] [10]

M. Honda, Y. Kao, N. Okamura and T. Takeuchi,A Simple parameterization of matter effects on neutrino oscillations,hep-ph/0602115

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[12] [11]

M. Honda, N. Okamura and T. Takeuchi,Matter Effect on Neutrino Oscillations from the violation of Universality in Neutrino Neutral Current Interactions,hep-ph/0603268

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[13] [12]

S.K. Agarwalla, Y. Kao and T. Takeuchi,Analytical approximation of the neutrino oscillation matter effects at largeθ 13,JHEP04(2014) 047 [1302.6773]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2014

[14] [13]

M. Blennow and A.Y. Smirnov,Neutrino propagation in matter,Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013(2013) 972485 [1306.2903]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[15] [14]

P.B. Denton, H. Minakata and S.J. Parke,Compact Perturbative Expressions For Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,JHEP06(2016) 051 [1604.08167]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[16] [15]

S.-F. Ge and A.Y. Smirnov,Non-standard interactions and the CP phase measurements in neutrino oscillations at low energies,JHEP10(2016) 138 [1607.08513]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[17] [16]

A. Ioannisian and S. Pokorski,Three Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Lett. B782 (2018) 641 [1801.10488]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[18] [17]

P.B. Denton, S.J. Parke and X. Zhang,Rotations Versus Perturbative Expansions for Calculating Neutrino Oscillation Probabilities in Matter,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 033001 [1806.01277]. – 46 – [18]Particle Data Groupcollaboration,Review of particle physics,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 030001

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2018

[19] [19]

H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing,On the parametrization of flavor mixing in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D57(1998) 594 [hep-ph/9708366]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1998

[20] [20]

H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing,How to describe neutrino mixing and CP violation,Phys. Lett. B 517(2001) 363 [hep-ph/0103242]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2001

[21] [21]

W. Rodejohann and J.W.F. Valle,Symmetrical Parametrizations of the Lepton Mixing Matrix,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 073011 [1108.3484]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[22] [22]

P.B. Denton and R. Pestes,The impact of different parameterizations on the interpretation of CP violation in neutrino oscillations,JHEP05(2021) 139 [2006.09384]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[23] [23]

A. Gupta, D. Majumdar and S. Prakash,Neutrino oscillation measurements with KamLAND and JUNO in the presence of scalar NSI,Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025) 102011 [2306.07343]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[24] [24]

D.K. Singha, R. Majhi, L. Panda, M. Ghosh and R. Mohanta,Study of scalar nonstandard interaction at the Protvino to super-ORCA experiment,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 095038 [2308.10789]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[25] [25]

P.B. Denton, A. Giarnetti and D. Meloni,How to identify different new neutrino oscillation physics scenarios at DUNE,JHEP02(2023) 210 [2210.00109]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[26] [26]

D. Bezboruah, D.S. Chattopadhyay, A. Medhi, A. Sarker and M.M. Devi,Neutrino oscillations in presence of diagonal elements of scalar NSI: an analytic approach,JHEP12 (2025) 222 [2410.05250]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[27] [27]

P.B. Denton, A. Giarnetti and D. Meloni,Solar neutrinos and the strongest oscillation constraints on scalar NSI,JHEP01(2025) 097 [2409.15411]. [28]JUNOcollaboration,Sub-percent precision measurement of neutrino oscillation parameters with JUNO,Chin. Phys. C46(2022) 123001 [2204.13249]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[28] [32]

C. Giunti and C.W. Kim,Fundamentals of Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics, Oxford University Press (03, 2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508717.001.0001

View on Pith doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198508717.001.0001 2007

[29] [33]

H. Nunokawa, S.J. Parke and R. Zukanovich Funchal,Another possible way to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 013009 [hep-ph/0503283]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2005

[30] [34]

S. Parke,What is∆m 2 ee ?,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 053008 [1601.07464]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2016

[31] [35]

A. Sch¨ onhage,Zur Konvergenz des Jacobi-Verfahrens,Numerische Mathematik3(1961) 374

View on Pith 1961

[32] [36]

J.H. Wilkinson,Note on the quadratic convergence of the cyclic Jacobi process,Numerische Mathematik4(1962) 296

View on Pith 1962

[33] [37]

P.I. Krastev and S.T. Petcov,Resonance Amplification and t Violation Effects in Three Neutrino Oscillations in the Earth,Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 84

View on Pith 1988

[34] [38]

S. Toshev,On T violation in matter neutrino oscillations,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 455. – 47 –

View on Pith 1991

[35] [39]

E.K. Akhmedov,Neutrino physics, inICTP Summer School in Particle Physics, pp. 103–164, 6, 1999 [hep-ph/0001264]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[36] [40]

P.B. Denton and S.J. Parke,Parameter symmetries of neutrino oscillations in vacuum, matter, and approximation schemes,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 013002 [2106.12436]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[37] [41]

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and T. Li,Explaining(g−2) µ,e, the KOTO anomaly and the MiniBooNE excess in an extended Higgs model with sterile neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 055017 [2006.01319]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[38] [42]

B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, K.J. Kelly, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma,Non-standard neutrino interactions mediated by a light scalar at DUNE,JHEP07(2024) 213 [2401.02107]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[39] [43]

B. Dutta, A. Karthikeyan, N. Mishra, Y. Porto and L.E. Strigari,Scalar non-standard neutrino interactions in Galactic supernovae,2508.16558

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[40] [44]

S.-F. Ge and S.J. Parke,Scalar Nonstandard Interactions in Neutrino Oscillation,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 211801 [1812.08376]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[41] [45]

S. Choubey and A. Lund,Neutrino mass ordering in JUNO at risk from scalar NSI induced resonance,2602.05564

View on Pith arXiv

[42] [46]

T. Ohlsson,Status of non-standard neutrino interactions,Rept. Prog. Phys.76(2013) 044201 [1209.2710]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2013

[43] [47]

P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J.P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08 (2023) 032 [2305.07698]. [48]DUNEcollaboration,Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE) Near Detector Conceptual Design Report,Instruments5(2021) 31 [2103.13910]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[44] [49]

H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing,Mass and flavor mixing schemes of quarks and leptons,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.45(2000) 1 [hep-ph/9912358]. – 48 –

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2000