Relativistic dynamical friction in Kerr-Schild coordinates

Francesca Chadha-Day; James Maxwell; Katy Clough; Zipeng Wang

REVIEW

Relativistic dynamical friction in Kerr-Schild coordinates

Zipeng Wang, Francesca Chadha-Day, Katy Clough, James Maxwell

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 9 Oct 2026 · 31 references

Pith's verdict: Clean, honest methods paper that does what it says: validates a force extraction scheme in KS coordinates for dynamical friction. One textual error in Eq. (32) needs correction but doesn't undermine the work.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 12, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 2 major objections · 6 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2610.13684 (version 1)

Pith IDY7A7KXTL, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationFrancesca Chadha-Day, James Maxwell, Katy Clough, Zipeng Wang. "Relativistic dynamical friction in Kerr-Schild coordinates." arXiv:2610.13684 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Y7A7KXTL

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

This paper does exactly what it advertises—it gives a principled framework for transforming dynamical-friction diagnostics between coordinate frames when running 3+1 simulations on a fixed background, and it validates the approach by reproducing known analytic results for a nonspinning black hole in boosted Kerr-Schild coordinates. The writing is clear, the limitations are laid out openly (frame-mismatch at finite radius, slow decay of the shift, need for steady state), and the numerical convergence test is honest about the finite time before boundary effects appear.

The main strength is methodological: the paper works out the coordinate-transformation machinery for the translation generator ζ^μ and shows why you can't just use the SF coordinate generator—you have to transform the DF generator. The numerical agreement (Fig. 3, left panel) for large cloud sizes and moderate boosts is solid. The authors also properly discuss why small-R results deviate (different slicings) rather than smoothing over the discrepancy.

Now the soft spot. The stress-test note about Eq. (32) is correct: the stated Jacobian order J_ISO→KS · J_boost^{-1} is backwards if J_boost is defined by Eq. (30) (unboosted→boosted). The correct composition for DC→SC should be J_boost · J_ISO→KS. The fact that the numerical results match analytic expectations tells me the actual implementation likely uses the correct order, but the text as written is inconsistent and would trip up anyone trying to reproduce the method from the paper alone. This is a load-bearing detail for the scheme's reproducibility, and it must be fixed—either by correcting the order or by clarifying the convention that J_boost is defined for the inverse transformation.

Everything else checks out. The paper is not groundbreaking, but it is a careful, reproducible piece of numerical relativity that will be useful to anyone simulating dynamical friction around black holes. The authors do not oversell; they explicitly leave the spinning case to future work. The citation pattern is appropriate, the pseudotensor choice is standard, and the self-citations refer to prior work that is published and checkable.

Recommendation: this deserves a serious referee. I would recommend acceptance after the authors clarify Eq. (32)—either by correcting the order or by stating explicitly the mapping convention. The rest of the paper is in good shape.

Referee report

Significance

If the framework is sound, it provides a practical and computationally efficient way to study relativistic dynamical friction and similar backreaction effects using horizon-penetrating Kerr-Schild coordinates, which avoid the coordinate singularities of isotropic Schwarzschild coordinates. The ability to transform analytic diagnostics into a numerically convenient frame is valuable for simulations of scalar dark matter around black holes. The validation against known analytic results is convincing, and the convergence test (4th order up to t~1800M) supports the numerical implementation. The clear discussion of frame-dependent effects and the distinction between coordinate translations and physical observers' measurements is a useful clarification for the community.

Major objections (2)

[III, Eq. (32)] The Jacobian composition as written, J_DC→SC = J_ISO→KS · J_boost^{-1}, is inconsistent with the transformation chain described in the text. According to Eqs. (30) and (31), the correct mapping from isotropic (DC) to boosted Kerr-Schild (SC) is: isotropic → unboosted KS (J_ISO→KS) → boosted KS (J_boost). This yields J_boost · J_ISO→KS. The paper's expression uses the opposite order and includes an inverse that would map from boosted to unboosted KS. This error, if taken literally, would produce an incorrect transformation of the translation generator ζ^μ, undermining the force extraction. Given that the numerical results match analytic predictions, the implementation presumably uses the correct composition, but the text must be corrected to avoid confusion and ensure reproducibility.
[III, text after Eq. (32)] The sentence "The DC quantities, ¯α,¯β^μ, and ¯N^μ, are transformed into SC with J_DC→SC" is ambiguous and potentially misleading. In the force extraction scheme (Eq. (26)), the ADM variables used are those of the simulation frame itself (α, β, γ), not transformed from the diagnostic frame. The only object that requires transformation between frames is the vector field ζ^μ. The authors should clarify what quantities they actually transform and why, or remove the sentence if it refers to an unused step.

Minor objections (6)

[Fig. 2] The colorbar for ζ^t ranges over both positive and negative values, but the central white region is not annotated. Consider adding explicit labels or a note that the white region corresponds to points outside the isotropic coordinate patch (as stated in the caption).
[II.D] The text references Eq. (23) as the flux-based definition of dynamical friction but does not give a label to that equation in the displayed text. Ensure that Eq. (23) is clearly labeled or referenced by its displayed number.
[Eq. (33)] The term "D( ¯α_s≪1,Λ≫1)" is typeset as a subscript brace but appears incomplete. Check the parentheses and ensure the expression is correctly grouped.
[IV, Eq. (36)] The definition of Cin(z) is given as an integral, which is helpful. However, the standard notation is Cin(z) = γ + ln z - Ci(z) or the integral form; please ensure consistency with common usage to avoid confusion.
[Appendix A] The general expressions for Q, S, F^i are given for arbitrary ζ^μ. It would be helpful to explicitly note that for ζ^μ = δ^μ_i (the translation generator in the diagnostic frame) these reduce to Eqs. (10), (11), (18) of Clough (2021), as referenced in the main text.
[Sec. V, first paragraph] The large-cloud and small-cloud scenarios are defined in Sec. IV, but the text does not explicitly reference the corresponding equations (33) and (36). Adding such references would improve clarity.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

This paper establishes a general framework for transforming diagnostic observables between coordinate frames in 3+1 numerical relativity and shows that the dynamical friction force on a non-spinning black hole moving through wave dark…

The reading

The authors show how to compute the relativistic dynamical friction force on a black hole when the simulation uses boosted Kerr-Schild coordinates, even though the natural diagnostic definition is in isotropic Schwarzschild coordinates. They provide a general transformation rule: the current that gives the momentum transfer between matter and curvature must be defined using the translation generator of the diagnostic frame, transformed into the simulation frame. When the integration volume is large enough that the two frames coincide at the boundary, the extracted force agrees with analytic results. The work validates the method by reproducing previous relativistic wave dark matter simulations, and it opens the way to more efficient simulations of the Magnus effect around spinning black holes, where the closed-form Kerr-Schild metric saves computational cost.

What carries the argument

The central identity is the force extraction formula Eq. (26): $F_i = (dt/d\tau) \int \sqrt{\gamma}\,\alpha\, T^{\mu\nu}\, \nabla_\mu\zeta_\nu\, dV$, where $\zeta^\mu$ is the translation generator of the diagnostic frame (defined as $\zeta^\mu_{(i)} = \delta^\mu_i$ in isotropic Schwarzschild) transformed into the simulation-frame coordinates. This source term, derived from the Einstein pseudotensor conservation law, directly measures the momentum flow from matter to curvature. The paper also provides the explicit 3+1 decomposed form (Eq. A4) for practical implementation in ADM-based codes.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The force extraction scheme of Eq. (26) — which uses the ADM source term with the translation generator $\zeta^\mu$ transformed from the diagnostic frame (isotropic Schwarzschild) into the simulation frame (boosted Kerr-Schild) — correctly reproduces the dynamical friction force measured in the diagnostic frame, provided the matter reaches a steady state and the two coordinate systems coincide outside the integration boundary. The paper demonstrates that a naive use of the Kerr-Schild coordinate generator would give a spurious contribution that grows with cloud radius, whereas the transformed generator yields the correct isotropic-frame force.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the diagnostic frame (isotropic Schwarzschild) and simulation frame (boosted Kerr-Schild) coordinate systems coincide outside the outer boundary of the integration volume; in practice they coincide only asymptotically, so for finite cloud radii the measured force differs from the true isotropic-frame force.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The frame-transformation framework can be applied to any fixed-background problem where the natural diagnostic frame differs from the simulation frame, not only for dynamical friction but also for energy or angular-momentum diagnostics.
Using boosted Kerr-Schild coordinates instead of quasi-isotropic coordinates for spinning black holes eliminates the need to store and differentiate the metric numerically, reducing computational cost and improving accuracy for high spins and high boosts.
The validated force extraction enables reliable simulations of the gravitational Magnus effect on spinning black holes moving through scalar dark matter, extending the earlier work that used the more expensive quasi-isotropic approach.
The explicit comparison between simulation results and analytic expressions shows that the force measurement is insensitive to the chosen slicing only when the matter decays sufficiently fast or the integration volume is large — a cautionary lesson for other moving-black-hole studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method should be straightforward to extend to the spinning (Kerr) case, because the same general transformation rule applies; the main new work is computing the Jacobian between isotropic and Kerr-Schild for a rotating, boosted black hole.
The framework could also be applied to static neutron-star backgrounds (e.g., in boson-star or dark-matter-cusp studies) where the simulation uses horizon-penetrating coordinates but the desired diagnostic is in an asymptotically flat coordinate system.
One could directly test the assumption that the frames coincide at the boundary by repeating the v=0.8 run with a still larger outer boundary (e.g., R=1200M) and checking whether the deviation from the analytic formula reduces further, as the paper itself suggests.

Original abstract

Simulations of the evolution of matter on static metric backgrounds allow us to estimate backreaction effects like dynamical friction at first order in the matter density. Previous simulations of dynamical friction have used boosted isotropic and quasi-isotropic Kerr coordinates, which simplifies the extraction of the relevant diagnostics but results in a more complicated implementation of the evolution. In particular, the lack of horizon penetrating coordinates means that high resolutions are needed to ensure convergence, and the boosted, spinning black hole metric cannot easily be written in a closed form, making it more costly to evaluate. In this paper we describe how to reformulate the calculation of the diagnostics in the boosted Kerr-Schild frame for the non-spinning case. We verify that our implementation reproduces previous results quantifying dynamical friction in wave-like dark matter in the appropriate regimes. We discuss the subtleties of transforming diagnostic observables between frames in a 3+1 evolution and develop a general framework for this process.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-12: 1 request, 4,996 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.50 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.16 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Simulations of the evolution of matter on static metric backgrounds allow us to estimate backreaction effects like dynamical friction at first order in the matter density. Previous simulations of dynamical friction have used boosted isotropic and quasi-isotropic Kerr coordinates, which simplifies the extraction of the relevant diagnostics but results in a more complicated implementation of the evolution. In particular, the lack of horizon penetrating coordinates means that high resolutions are needed to ensure convergence, and the boosted, spinning black hole metric cannot easily be written in a closed form, making it more costly to evaluate. In this paper we describe how to reformulate the calculation of the diagnostics in the boosted Kerr-Schild frame for the non-spinning case. We verify that our implementation reproduces previous results quantifying dynamical friction in wave-like dark matter in the appropriate regimes. We discuss the subtleties of transforming diagnostic observables between frames in a 3+1 evolution and develop a general framework for this process.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Simulations of the evolution of matter on static metric backgrounds allow us to estimate backreaction effects like dynamical friction at first order in the matter density.	background 0.94	0.34	0.06	asserted 0.84
s1	Previous simulations of dynamical friction have used boosted isotropic and quasi-isotropic Kerr coordinates, which simplifies the extraction of the relevant diagnostics but results in a more complicated implementation of the evolution.	background 0.99	0.05	0.04	asserted 1.00
s2	In particular, the lack of horizon penetrating coordinates means that high resolutions are needed to ensure convergence, and the boosted, spinning black hole metric cannot easily be written in a closed form, making it more costly to evaluate.	background 0.75	0.09	0.03	asserted 1.00
s3	In this paper we describe how to reformulate the calculation of the diagnostics in the boosted Kerr-Schild frame for the non-spinning case.	contribution 0.98	0.90	0.24	asserted 0.97
s4	We verify that our implementation reproduces previous results quantifying dynamical friction in wave-like dark matter in the appropriate regimes.	result 0.88	0.95	0.21	asserted 1.00
s5	We discuss the subtleties of transforming diagnostic observables between frames in a 3+1 evolution and develop a general framework for this process.	contribution 0.94	0.92	0.16	asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.98 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. Constant Schwarzschild time spatial slices in Kerr

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. The translation generator

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Results of the dynamical friction force extracted with the updated extraction scheme compared with analytical formulae.

**Figure 4.** FIG. 4. Test of convergence for the extracted dynamical fric

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.13684 by the authors.

References

Works cited (31)

[1]

S. Chandrasekhar, Dynamical Friction. I. General Con- siderations: the Coefficient of Dynamical Friction, Astro- phys. J.97, 255 (1943)

View on Pith 1943
[2]

M. A. Ruderman and E. A. Spiegel, Galactic Wakes, As- trophys. J.165, 1 (1971)

View on Pith 1971
[3]

Y. Rephaeli and E. E. Salpeter, Flow past a massive ob- ject and the gravitational drag, Astrophys. J.240, 20 (1980)

View on Pith 1980
[4]

E. C. Ostriker, Dynamical friction in a gaseous medium, Astrophys. J.513, 252 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9810324 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999
[5]

S. Tremaine and M. D. Weinberg, Dynamical friction in spherical systems., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.209, 729 (1984)

View on Pith 1984
[6]

T. Muto, T. Takeuchi, and S. Ida, On the Interaction be- tween a Protoplanetary Disk and a Planet in an Eccentric Orbit: Application of Dynamical Friction, Astrophys. J. 737, 37 (2011), arXiv:1106.0417 [astro-ph.EP]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011
[7]

R. Vicente, V. Cardoso, and M. Zilh˜ ao, Dynamical fric- tion in slab geometries and accretion disks, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.489, 5424 (2019), arXiv:1905.06353 [astro-ph.GA]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[8]

D. Syer, Relativistic dynamical friction in the weak scat- tering limit, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.270, 205 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404063 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994
[9]

L. I. Petrich, S. L. Shapiro, R. F. Stark, and S. A. Teukol- sky, Accretion onto a Moving Black Hole: A Fully Rela- tivistic Treatment, Astrophys. J.336, 313 (1989)

View on Pith 1989
[10]

E. Barausse, Relativistic dynamical friction in a colli- sional fluid, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.382, 826 (2007), arXiv:0709.0211 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[11]

M. Correia, Covariant formulation of relativistic mechan- ics, Phys. Rev. D105, 084041 (2022), arXiv:2202.04658 [gr-qc]. 10

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[12]

L. Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 247 (2021), arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[13]

L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Ul- tralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D95, 043541 (2017), arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[14]

L. Lancaster, C. Giovanetti, P. Mocz, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti, and D. N. Spergel, Dynamical Fric- tion in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Universe, JCAP1, 1, arXiv:1909.06381 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1909
[15]

B. Bar-Or, J.-B. Fouvry, and S. Tremaine, Relaxation in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Halo, Astrophys. J.871, 28 (2019), arXiv:1809.07673 [astro-ph.GA]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019
[16]

L. Annulli, V. Cardoso, and R. Vicente, Stirred and shaken: Dynamical behavior of boson stars and dark matter cores, Phys. Lett. B811, 135944 (2020), arXiv:2007.03700 [astro-ph.HE]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[17]

L. Annulli, V. Cardoso, and R. Vicente, Response of ultralight dark matter to supermassive black holes and binaries, Phys. Rev. D102, 063022 (2020), arXiv:2009.00012 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[18]

Y. Wang and R. Easther, Dynamical friction from ul- tralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 063523 (2022), arXiv:2110.03428 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[19]

D. Dutta Chowdhury, F. C. van den Bosch, V. H. Robles, P. van Dokkum, H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broad- hurst, On the Random Motion of Nuclear Objects in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Halo, Astrophys. J.916, 27 (2021), arXiv:2105.05268 [astro-ph.GA]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[20]

S. T. H. Hartman, H. A. Winther, and D. F. Mota, Dynamical friction in Bose-Einstein condensed self- interacting dark matter at finite temperatures, and the Fornax dwarf spheroidal, Astron. Astrophys.647, A70 (2021), arXiv:2011.00116 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[21]

A. Boudon, P. Brax, and P. Valageas, Subsonic accretion and dynamical friction for a black hole moving through a self-interacting scalar dark matter cloud, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043507 (2022), arXiv:2204.09401 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[22]

R. Buehler and V. Desjacques, Dynamical friction in fuzzy dark matter: Circular orbits, Phys. Rev. D107, 023516 (2023), arXiv:2207.13740 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[23]

G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, Dynamical friction in gravitational atoms, JCAP07, 070, arXiv:2305.15460 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[24]

D. Traykova, R. Vicente, K. Clough, T. Helfer, E. Berti, P. G. Ferreira, and L. Hui, Relativistic drag forces on black holes from scalar dark matter clouds of all sizes, Phys. Rev. D108, L121502 (2023), arXiv:2305.10492 [gr- qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[25]

D. Traykova, K. Clough, T. Helfer, E. Berti, P. G. Fer- reira, and L. Hui, Dynamical friction from scalar dark matter in the relativistic regime, Phys. Rev. D104, 103014 (2021), arXiv:2106.08280 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[26]

R. Vicente and V. Cardoso, Dynamical friction of black holes in ultralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 083008 (2022), arXiv:2201.08854 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022
[27]

S. Roy, R. Vicente, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and P. G. Ferreira, Scalar Fields around Black Hole Binaries in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 191402 (2026), arXiv:2510.17967 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[28]

Z. Wang, T. Helfer, D. Traykova, K. Clough, and E. Berti, Gravitational Magnus effect from scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D110, 024009 (2024), arXiv:2402.07977 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[29]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits,The Classical Theory of Fields, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. Volume 2 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975)

View on Pith 1975
[30]

K. Clough, Continuity equations for general matter: ap- plications in numerical relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 167001 (2021), arXiv:2104.13420 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021
[31]

J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, J. Bamber, and P. G. Ferreira, Effect of Wave Dark Matter on Equal Mass Black Hole Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 211401 (2024), arXiv:2311.18156 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [1]

S. Chandrasekhar, Dynamical Friction. I. General Con- siderations: the Coefficient of Dynamical Friction, Astro- phys. J.97, 255 (1943)

View on Pith 1943

[2] [2]

M. A. Ruderman and E. A. Spiegel, Galactic Wakes, As- trophys. J.165, 1 (1971)

View on Pith 1971

[3] [3]

Y. Rephaeli and E. E. Salpeter, Flow past a massive ob- ject and the gravitational drag, Astrophys. J.240, 20 (1980)

View on Pith 1980

[4] [4]

E. C. Ostriker, Dynamical friction in a gaseous medium, Astrophys. J.513, 252 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9810324 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1999

[5] [5]

S. Tremaine and M. D. Weinberg, Dynamical friction in spherical systems., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.209, 729 (1984)

View on Pith 1984

[6] [6]

T. Muto, T. Takeuchi, and S. Ida, On the Interaction be- tween a Protoplanetary Disk and a Planet in an Eccentric Orbit: Application of Dynamical Friction, Astrophys. J. 737, 37 (2011), arXiv:1106.0417 [astro-ph.EP]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2011

[7] [7]

R. Vicente, V. Cardoso, and M. Zilh˜ ao, Dynamical fric- tion in slab geometries and accretion disks, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.489, 5424 (2019), arXiv:1905.06353 [astro-ph.GA]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[8] [8]

D. Syer, Relativistic dynamical friction in the weak scat- tering limit, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.270, 205 (1994), arXiv:astro-ph/9404063 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1994

[9] [9]

L. I. Petrich, S. L. Shapiro, R. F. Stark, and S. A. Teukol- sky, Accretion onto a Moving Black Hole: A Fully Rela- tivistic Treatment, Astrophys. J.336, 313 (1989)

View on Pith 1989

[10] [10]

E. Barausse, Relativistic dynamical friction in a colli- sional fluid, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.382, 826 (2007), arXiv:0709.0211 [astro-ph]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[11] [11]

M. Correia, Covariant formulation of relativistic mechan- ics, Phys. Rev. D105, 084041 (2022), arXiv:2202.04658 [gr-qc]. 10

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[12] [12]

L. Hui, Wave Dark Matter, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 59, 247 (2021), arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[13] [13]

L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, Ul- tralight scalars as cosmological dark matter, Phys. Rev. D95, 043541 (2017), arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[14] [14]

L. Lancaster, C. Giovanetti, P. Mocz, Y. Kahn, M. Lisanti, and D. N. Spergel, Dynamical Fric- tion in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Universe, JCAP1, 1, arXiv:1909.06381 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 1909

[15] [15]

B. Bar-Or, J.-B. Fouvry, and S. Tremaine, Relaxation in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Halo, Astrophys. J.871, 28 (2019), arXiv:1809.07673 [astro-ph.GA]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2019

[16] [16]

L. Annulli, V. Cardoso, and R. Vicente, Stirred and shaken: Dynamical behavior of boson stars and dark matter cores, Phys. Lett. B811, 135944 (2020), arXiv:2007.03700 [astro-ph.HE]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[17] [17]

L. Annulli, V. Cardoso, and R. Vicente, Response of ultralight dark matter to supermassive black holes and binaries, Phys. Rev. D102, 063022 (2020), arXiv:2009.00012 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[18] [18]

Y. Wang and R. Easther, Dynamical friction from ul- tralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 063523 (2022), arXiv:2110.03428 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[19] [19]

D. Dutta Chowdhury, F. C. van den Bosch, V. H. Robles, P. van Dokkum, H.-Y. Schive, T. Chiueh, and T. Broad- hurst, On the Random Motion of Nuclear Objects in a Fuzzy Dark Matter Halo, Astrophys. J.916, 27 (2021), arXiv:2105.05268 [astro-ph.GA]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[20] [20]

S. T. H. Hartman, H. A. Winther, and D. F. Mota, Dynamical friction in Bose-Einstein condensed self- interacting dark matter at finite temperatures, and the Fornax dwarf spheroidal, Astron. Astrophys.647, A70 (2021), arXiv:2011.00116 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[21] [21]

A. Boudon, P. Brax, and P. Valageas, Subsonic accretion and dynamical friction for a black hole moving through a self-interacting scalar dark matter cloud, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043507 (2022), arXiv:2204.09401 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[22] [22]

R. Buehler and V. Desjacques, Dynamical friction in fuzzy dark matter: Circular orbits, Phys. Rev. D107, 023516 (2023), arXiv:2207.13740 [astro-ph.CO]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[23] [23]

G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, Dynamical friction in gravitational atoms, JCAP07, 070, arXiv:2305.15460 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[24] [24]

D. Traykova, R. Vicente, K. Clough, T. Helfer, E. Berti, P. G. Ferreira, and L. Hui, Relativistic drag forces on black holes from scalar dark matter clouds of all sizes, Phys. Rev. D108, L121502 (2023), arXiv:2305.10492 [gr- qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[25] [25]

D. Traykova, K. Clough, T. Helfer, E. Berti, P. G. Fer- reira, and L. Hui, Dynamical friction from scalar dark matter in the relativistic regime, Phys. Rev. D104, 103014 (2021), arXiv:2106.08280 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[26] [26]

R. Vicente and V. Cardoso, Dynamical friction of black holes in ultralight dark matter, Phys. Rev. D105, 083008 (2022), arXiv:2201.08854 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

[27] [27]

S. Roy, R. Vicente, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and P. G. Ferreira, Scalar Fields around Black Hole Binaries in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 191402 (2026), arXiv:2510.17967 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[28] [28]

Z. Wang, T. Helfer, D. Traykova, K. Clough, and E. Berti, Gravitational Magnus effect from scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D110, 024009 (2024), arXiv:2402.07977 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[29] [29]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifschits,The Classical Theory of Fields, Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. Volume 2 (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975)

View on Pith 1975

[30] [30]

K. Clough, Continuity equations for general matter: ap- plications in numerical relativity, Class. Quant. Grav.38, 167001 (2021), arXiv:2104.13420 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2021

[31] [31]

J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, J. Bamber, and P. G. Ferreira, Effect of Wave Dark Matter on Equal Mass Black Hole Mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 211401 (2024), arXiv:2311.18156 [gr-qc]

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024