REVIEW
$\Lambda_b \to \Lambda \ell^+\ell^-$ and $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^{\ast} \ell^+\ell^-$ decays with polarized leptons
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 19 Oct 2026 · 90 references
Pith's verdict: First polarization predictions for Λ_b→Λ*ℓℓ; uncertainty treatment in the Λ* channel is fragile at current precision.
T0 · AI review
Why Pith says this
Highlight any text to comment on it.
Referee report
The paper
The paper claims
This paper presents the first calculation of lepton polarization observables in Λ_b → Λ* ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ decays and identifies the longitudinal-normal asymmetry P_LN as the most sensitive double-polarization probe of weak phases.
The reading
What carries the argument
The analysis uses the helicity method to express the decay amplitudes in terms of transversity amplitudes, which decompose the hadronic matrix elements into vector, axial-vector, tensor, and axial-tensor form factors. For Λ_b → Λ the decomposition uses 10 lattice QCD form factors; for Λ_b → Λ* it uses 14. The observables are rational combinations of these transversity amplitudes. The key observable P_LN arises from the imaginary part of the interference between timelike and longitudinal transversity amplitudes, specifically from terms such as Im[$A_L^{{∥t}}$ $A_L^{{∥0*}}$ - $A_R^{{∥t}}$ $A_L^{{∥0*}}$ + ...], which selects the combination sensitive to a weak phase in C_{10} and $C_9^{{eff}}$.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central discovery is that the longitudinal-normal asymmetry P_LN in Λ_b → Λ ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ is the most sensitive double-polarization observable for detecting a weak phase in the effective Wilson coefficients, because its numerator isolates the imaginary part of the interference between timelike and longitudinal transversity amplitudes, which is directly proportional to Im[C_{10}($C_9^{{eff}}$ + C_{10})^*]. In the Λ_b → Λ* ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ channel, the corresponding asymmetry P*_LN is computed for the first time; it has the opposite sign and smaller distinguishing power, but still deviates from the standard model in new physics scenarios with complex phases. The full set of single and double lepton polarization asymmetries and polarized forward-backward asymmetries is provided for both channels, enabling experimental tests of the chiral structure of the b→sℓ⁺ℓ⁻ transition.
Load-bearing premise
The accuracy of the lattice QCD form factors from [58] and [86] fully captures the hadronic uncertainties in the transversity amplitudes; any unaccounted errors in these form factors could shift the predicted asymmetries and degrade their discriminating power.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- These polarization observables provide new tests of the chiral structure of b→sℓ⁺ℓ⁻ effective operators, complementing existing tests from B-meson decays.
- The P_LN asymmetry in Λ_b → Λ ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ offers a clean handle on CP-violating new physics, as it can separate scenarios with complex Wilson coefficients from the standard model.
- The Λ* channel extends the kinematic reach and provides cross-checks via the opposite sign of P*_LN relative to P_LN.
- Binned predictions in Tables 2 and 3 serve as direct targets for experimental analyses at LHCb, especially if muon polarization can be partially reconstructed.
- The relations between observables, such as A_LNFB ∝ P_NT and A_NTFB ∝ P_LN, reduce the number of independent measurements needed to extract the short-distance parameters.
Reading between the lines
- If lattice QCD form factor uncertainties are reduced, especially for the Λ* channel, the distinguishing power of several asymmetries (e.g., P_TT and P_NN) will improve significantly.
- The T-odd asymmetries (e.g., P_NT, P_LN) could be combined with CP-odd differences between Λ_b and anti-Λ_b to isolate genuine CP violation beyond the standard model, as suggested by the authors.
- The framework can be extended to other baryon decays such as Ξ_b → Ξ ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ and Ω_b → Ω ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ to test the universality of polarization observables across different baryon sectors.
- Experimental feasibility studies at LHCb should investigate whether lepton-polarization reconstruction, though difficult for muons, can be achieved in the full cascade decay Λ_b → Λ(→ N π) ℓ⁺ℓ⁻.
Original abstract
We present an analysis of lepton polarization observables in the rare flavor-changing neutral current decays $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\ell^+\ell^-$ and $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^*\ell^+\ell^-$. These decays are driven by the quark-level transition $b \to s\ell^+\ell^-$ and are sensitive to short-distance physics within and beyond the Standard Model. We work within an effective Hamiltonian framework and derive single lepton polarization asymmetries, double lepton polarization asymmetries, and polarized forward-backward asymmetries using the helicity method. The observables are expressed in terms of transversity amplitudes and evaluated using state-of-the-art lattice QCD form factors. We analyze the $q^2$ dependence of several observables for both the ground-state $\Lambda$ and the excited $\Lambda^*(1520)$ final states and discuss sensitivities of the observables to chiral structure of the effective operators and complex Wilson coefficients.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
The abstract, sentence by sentence
We present an analysis of lepton polarization observables in the rare flavor-changing neutral current decays $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\ell^+\ell^-$ and $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^*\ell^+\ell^-$. These decays are driven by the quark-level transition $b \to s\ell^+\ell^-$ and are sensitive to short-distance physics within and beyond the Standard Model. We work within an effective Hamiltonian framework and derive single lepton polarization asymmetries, double lepton polarization asymmetries, and polarized forward-backward asymmetries using the helicity method. The observables are expressed in terms of transversity amplitudes and evaluated using state-of-the-art lattice QCD form factors. We analyze the $q^2$ dependence of several observables for both the ground-state $\Lambda$ and the excited $\Lambda^*(1520)$ final states and discuss sensitivities of the observables to chiral structure of the effective operators and complex Wilson coefficients.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | We present an analysis of lepton polarization observables in the rare flavor-changing neutral current decays $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda\ell^+\ell^-$ and $\Lambda_b \to \Lambda^*\ell^+\ell^-$. | contribution 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.08 | asserted 0.96 |
| s1 | These decays are driven by the quark-level transition $b \to s\ell^+\ell^-$ and are sensitive to short-distance physics within and beyond the Standard Model. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.04 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | We work within an effective Hamiltonian framework and derive single lepton polarization asymmetries, double lepton polarization asymmetries, and polarized forward-backward asymmetries using the helicity method. | method 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | The observables are expressed in terms of transversity amplitudes and evaluated using state-of-the-art lattice QCD form factors. | method 0.99 | 0.88 | 0.05 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | We analyze the $q^2$ dependence of several observables for both the ground-state $\Lambda$ and the excited $\Lambda^*(1520)$ final states and discuss sensitivities of the observables to chiral structure of the effective operators and complex Wilson coefficients. | contribution 0.93 | 0.94 | 0.15 | asserted 0.98 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
Figures
Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.27015 by the authors.
References
Discussion
Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.