Resurgence and Modularity in the First Painlev\'e Equation

Kohei Iwaki; Noam Tamarin

REVIEW

Resurgence and Modularity in the First Painlev\'e Equation

Kohei Iwaki, Noam Tamarin

High Energy Physics - Theory · Submitted 28 Oct 2026 · 21 references

Pith's verdict: A careful, explicit derivation of the Stokes–modular identity for Painlevé I, with one honest open chamber that keeps the central claim conditional.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on October 31, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 3 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2610.38584 (version 1)

Pith IDS3P7243S, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationKohei Iwaki, Noam Tamarin. "Resurgence and Modularity in the First Painlev\'e Equation." arXiv:2610.38584 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/S3P7243S

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Colleague —

This is a real result, not a repackaging. The new content is clearly identified: an explicit S-action realized by a 2π/5 rotation, the modular interpretation of the previously known T transformation, the normalization constants C_T = e^{πi/30} and C_S = e^{πi/20}, and the one-turn closure identity S_π ∘ S_0 ∘ S_{-π} = S ∘ T. The derivation is refreshingly explicit. Nothing is fitted: the parameter maps come from comparing linear Stokes multipliers after cyclic relabeling, and the constants are anchored independently, C_T from the large-z Fourier expansion and C_S from the regular symmetric solution. The tau-function prefactor cancellation in Section 4.3 is a short, checkable computation ending in Abel's five-term identity, and the Appendix B.1 normalization check is genuinely useful. The paper also credits prior work appropriately, including [2,21] for the T-parameter transformation and [15,20] for the cyclic dilogarithm identities.

The soft spots are proportional. The analytic assumptions — Borel summability, Fourier convergence, exact WKB connection formulas — are inherited from published work [8,9] and are stated plainly in Remarks 2.2 and 2.3 and Section 2.2.3. I would not count that against the paper beyond noting that the result is conditional on that package. The real soft spot is the chamber dependence of the S-relation, and the stress-test note is right to put its finger there. The paper itself says the simple S-action applies only to endpoint sectors straddling arg z = -4π/5, that straddling an anti-Stokes direction gives a different relation, and that the difference is deferred to an upcoming paper ([b255]-[b257], [b342]). That matters because the modular S is a fixed global map on (ν,ρ), while the Stokes composition is chamber-dependent; verifying the equality on one patch leaves open the possibility that the modular identification is chamber-specific. The one-turn continuation in Section 4.1 uses exactly that one chamber, so identity (4.9) is established there but not globally. This is honest but unresolved. There is also a smaller verification issue: a few conventions rest on a thesis and “to appear” references, which slows checking but is minor.

My overall read: the identity is probably correct, the T-leg is well anchored, and the S-leg is plausible but not yet fully closed. I would send this to a serious referee without hesitation. The referee should push on the missing chamber and, if it closes, the paper is a solid contribution. I would bring it to reading group.

What would settle it

Three checks would settle it. First, at a concrete pair such as $(\nu,\rho)=(1/3,1/4)$, apply the explicit Stokes map $\nu\mapsto\nu+\log(1-e^{2\pi i\rho})/(2\pi i)$ together with the half-rotation rules (B.5)–(B.9): the three-fold composition must return exactly $\mathsf T^{-1}\circ\mathsf S^{-1}(\nu,\rho)=(\rho,\rho-\nu-\tfrac12)$ on fixed branches. Second, for $0<a,b<1$ with $a+b>1$, say $a=0.4$, $b=0.8$, the five values $y_1=b$, $y_2=(1-b)/a$, $y_3=(a+b-1)/(ab)$, $y_4=(1-a)/b$, $y_5=a$ must satisfy $\sum_{j=1}^5 L(y_j)=\pi^2/2$, so the five-step tau prefactor product equals 1. Third, numerically solve the isomonodromy system (2.11) at $|z|=5$ and check that rotating $z$ by $2\pi/5$ and $8\pi/5$ reproduces the multiplier tables (3.18) and (3.9) under the stated cyclic shifts; any mismatch at leading order would break the derivation.

Referee report

Significance

If the derivation is accepted, the paper gives a clean and explicit bridge between two previously separate descriptions of the same Painlevé I data: nonlinear Stokes automorphisms from resurgence and modular transformations of the topological-recursion tau function. The strength of the paper is that the main parameter maps are not fitted: they are read off from independent linear Stokes multiplier comparisons, with the cyclic relabeling of sectors and the Torelli-marking changes tracked explicitly, and the normalization constants are anchored to independent data rather than adjusted to force the final identity. The tau-function prefactor cancellation in Section 4.3 is a self-contained five-step computation that makes the claim checkable. However, the paper's central identity is presently verified only in one chamber of endpoint sectors, and the authors themselves state that the other chamber is deferred to future work; this limitation must be addressed or the scope of the claims must be narrowed before the paper can be accepted as it stands.

Major objections (3)

[§3.3.2 and §4.1, Eq. (4.9)] The central identity S_π ∘ S_0 ∘ S_{-π} = S∘T is proved only for endpoint sectors straddling the nonlinear Stokes direction arg z = -4π/5. This is explicit in the paper: Section 3.3.2 states that the simple S-action applies to those sectors and that 'if the endpoints instead straddle an anti-Stokes direction, the parameter relation is different' (b255–b257), and Section 5 repeats that the chamber dependence is deferred (b342). The use of the S-relation in Eq. (4.6) is precisely this chamber version, so the equality in Eq. (4.9) has been verified on one chamber patch. Since the modular S-action is a fixed global map on (ν,ρ), whereas nonlinear Stokes maps are chamber-dependent in general, this leaves open the possibility that the identification with S is a chamber property rather than a global statement. I ask the authors either to provide the other-chamber derivation, or to state the final identity and the abstract claims with an explicit sector restriction. The authors acknowledge this: “If the endpoints instead straddle an anti-Stokes direction, the parameter relation is different; the two descriptions are related by Stokes transformations, consistently with the globalZ 5 symmetry.”
[Abstract and §4.1, Eqs. (4.5)–(4.9)] The abstract and introduction present Eq. (4.9) as a relation 'associated with a full turn around infinity' without the chamber qualifier. The actual computation in Section 4.1 uses z_p = e^{2πi/5} z_1 with a fixed small ε, i.e., one particular full-turn path whose intermediate Stokes crossings are known. A full-turn composition of the three Stokes maps may well be independent of the starting chamber, but the paper does not prove that independence. The reader is therefore asked to infer a global statement from a one-chamber computation. This is load-bearing because the advertised novelty is the identification of the Stokes composition with the global modular map S∘T, not merely with a local coordinate change. The authors acknowledge this: “The simpleS-action derived below applies to these endpoint sectors, which straddle the nonlinear Stokes direction argz=−4π/5.”
[§2.1 and Appendix B, Eqs. (B.3)–(B.8)] The evaluation of the Stokes-side composition in Eq. (4.7) relies on the half-rotation maps R_{±1/2}, which are stated to follow from relations 'given in [20, Appendix A]'. Reference [20] is a PhD thesis rather than a published article, and the companion references [10] and [12] are listed as 'to appear'. Since these rotations carry part of the argument for S_{-π} and S_0, the published record would be more complete if the required coefficient relations were either proved in the present paper or stated in a form that does not depend on unpublished material. This is a reproducibility concern rather than a mathematical error, but it should be fixed before final publication.

Minor objections (4)

[§4.1, line after Eq. (4.6)] The phrase 'The Srelation is used' is missing a space; it should read 'The S-relation is used'.
[Eq. (2.7) and Remark 2.2] The notation for the rescaling between g_s-dependent and unit-coupling variables is introduced only in Remark 2.2 and in Section 4, but the same symbols (ν,ρ) are used throughout. It would help the reader if the switch of conventions was stated again at the start of Section 4, where g_s is set to 1.
[Figure 3.1] The sequence of 24 panels is informative, but the reader would benefit from a brief description in the caption of the two or three panels where saddle connections occur, since those are the configurations relevant for the later mutation arguments.
[§4.3, Eq. (4.25)] The five-step recurrence is checked explicitly for 0<a,b<1 with a+b>1, and the extension by analytic continuation is asserted. A one-sentence comment on why the chosen analytic continuation preserves the additive representatives of ρ_j would remove any remaining ambiguity about the closure of the parameter recurrence.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

For the first Painlevé equation, three nonlinear Stokes maps met in one turn around infinity compose to the modular map S∘T, closing both the transcendent and its tau function after one loop.

The reading

This paper unifies two a priori independent descriptions of analytic continuation for the first Painlevé equation. On the resurgence side, a solution's transseries parameters jump across Stokes lines by nonlinear maps; on the modular side, the two-parameter tau function transforms when the homology basis of its elliptic spectral curve is rotated. The paper proves that these two descriptions coincide: after one counterclockwise turn around infinity, which crosses three Stokes directions in order, the composed Stokes map $S_\pi\circ S_0\circ S_{-\pi}$ equals the affine modular composition $\mathsf S\circ\mathsf T$ on the parameters $(\nu,\rho)$, with $\mathsf T$ realized by an $8\pi/5$ rotation and $\mathsf S$ by a $2\pi/5$ rotation of the independent variable. The proof compares exact WKB Stokes multipliers of the associated isomonodromy linear system before and after each rotation while tracking the Torelli marking, and it determines the tau-function normalization constants $C_T=e^{\pi i/30}$ and $C_S=e^{\pi i/20}$. Because the tau-function prefactors cancel via Abel's five-term identity for the Rogers dilogarithm, explicit single-valuedness after one full turn is obtained for both the Painlevé transcendent and its tau function.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on four pieces of machinery. (1) The elliptic spectral curve $\Sigma_{z,\nu}: y^2=x^3/18-zx/6-h(z,\nu)/3$, whose $A$-cycle period $\oint_A y\,dx=2\pi i\nu$ fixes the filling fraction $\nu$ and whose $B$-cycle encodes the saddle connection whose mutation drives the Stokes jump. (2) The two-parameter tau function $\tau(z,\nu,\rho;g_s)=\sum_{k\in\mathbb Z}e^{2\pi i k\rho/g_s}Z(z,\nu+kg_s;g_s)$, built from the topological recursion partition function by a discrete Fourier (Zak) transform, with $\rho$ the Fourier-conjugate parameter. (3) Exact WKB connection formulas expressing the five linear Stokes multipliers $s_k$ of the isomonodromy system as explicit combinations of $e^{\pm 2\pi i\nu/g_s}$ and $e^{\pm 2\pi i\rho/g_s}$; comparing the multiplier tables under the cyclic relabeling forced by the $\mathbb Z_5$ symmetry identifies the $\mathsf T$ and $\mathsf S$ parameter maps. (4) The tracking of the Torelli marking $(A,B)$ under continuous rotation, which realizes $\mathsf T$ via $(A,B)=(A',B'+A')$ and $\mathsf S$ via $(A,B)=(B'',-A'')$; the dilogarithmic prefactors in the tau-function jump formula then cancel over the five steps of the cyclic map $m=\mathsf S\circ S_\pi^{-1}$ through Abel's five-term identity $\sum_{j=1}^5 L(y_j)=\pi^2/2$ for the Rogers dilogarithm $L(y)=\mathrm{Li}_2(y)+\tfrac12\log y\log(1-y)$.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the identity (4.9), $S_\pi\circ S_0\circ S_{-\pi}=\mathsf S\circ\mathsf T$, an equality of maps on the two parameters $(\nu,\rho)$ of the Painlevé I tau function. The left side is the product of the nonlinear Stokes automorphisms met, in order, when $z$ makes one counterclockwise turn around infinity, crossing the Borel directions $\pi$, $0$, and $-\pi$. The right side is the affine modular group of the elliptic spectral curve, with $\mathsf T\colon(\nu,\rho)\mapsto(\nu,\rho-\nu+\tfrac12)$ realized by the rotation $z\mapsto e^{8\pi i/5}z$ and $\mathsf S\colon(\nu,\rho)\mapsto(-\rho,\nu)$ by $z\mapsto e^{2\pi i/5}z$, exploiting the $\mathbb Z_5$ rotational symmetry of Painlevé I. The two relations are derived by tracking the linear Stokes graph and the Torelli marking as $z$ rotates, then comparing the five linear Stokes multipliers of the isomonodromy system before and after, using the fact that the symmetry merely cyclically relabels the Stokes sectors; the $\mathsf T$-transformation is identified with a previously known parameter change, while the $\mathsf S$-transformation is new. The paper also fixes the multiplicative prefactors in the tau-function transformation laws ($C_T=e^{\pi i/30}$, $C_S=e^{\pi i/20}$ in the $g_s=1$ Fourier normalization) using the large-$z$ expansion and a rotationally symmetric solution regular at the origin, and shows that after five cyclic steps the parameter recurrence returns to its start while the dilogarithmic prefactors multiply to one by Abel's five-term identity, so that a single loop around infinity closes the tau function as well.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the analytic package the paper inherits from prior work — Borel summability of the topological-recursion partition function, convergence of the Fourier sums defining the two-parameter tau function, and validity of the exact WKB connection formulas for the linear Stokes multipliers, as stated in Remarks 2.2–2.3 and Section 2.2.3 — none of which is proved here; and the S-relation is verified only in one chamber straddling the Stokes direction arg z = −4π/5, the complementary chamber being deferred to an upcoming paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Analytic continuation of a Painlevé I solution around infinity now closes explicitly in the transseries picture: the three Stokes jumps accumulate exactly the parameter change of the modular rewriting, so single-valuedness holds in one loop rather than over several turns.
The full tau function, not just its second logarithmic derivative $u$, returns to its initial value after one turn, because the dilogarithmic prefactors cancel via Abel's five-term identity.
The known parameter transformation under an $8\pi/5$ rotation is reinterpreted as the modular $\mathsf T$-action, and the $2\pi/5$ rotation yields a new $\mathsf S$-action on sectorial transseries parameters, giving a complete modular picture of the rotational symmetry of Painlevé I.
The normalization constants $C_T=e^{\pi i/30}$ and $C_S=e^{\pi i/20}$ fix the tau-function transformation laws in the Fourier normalization, making the modular relations directly usable in any tau-function computation.
The Stokes-versus-modular comparison supplies a template: for any Painlevé or hierarchy equation whose tau function comes from a spectral curve, rotations of $z$ should realize modular transformations of the homology basis, with the Stokes data providing the conjugation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the identity holds, the modular group of the spectral curve is not auxiliary but is the actual monodromy of the transseries parameters; the dilogarithm identities appearing in cyclic connection problems would then be seen uniformly as the cocycle conditions of these modular transformations.
The $\mathsf S$-constant is fixed at the golden-ratio parameter $y_*=(\sqrt5-1)/2$, which belongs to the rotationally symmetric regular solution; this hints that the normalization constants are pinned down by $\mathbb Z_5$-symmetric fixed points, a route that could determine the analogues for higher Painlevé equations without a large-$z$ expansion.
One can predict the shape of an analogous statement for Painlevé II: a similar Stokes–modular identity should hold with rotation angles set by that equation's symmetry, and the prefactor cancellation should involve the same kind of dilogarithmic five-term structure on an appropriate cycle.
A numerical check at moderate $|z|$ that the five multiplier tables (3.9) and (3.18) match under the stated cyclic shifts would test the exact-WKB input directly, independently of the resurgent transseries side of the identity.

Original abstract

For the first Painlev\'e equation, we relate three nonlinear Stokes maps associated with a full turn around infinity to modular transformations of the two-parameter tau function through the identity $\boldsymbol S_\pi\circ\boldsymbol S_0\circ \boldsymbol S_{-\pi}=\mathsf S\circ\mathsf T$. Here the subscripts label Borel directions, while $\mathsf S$ and $\mathsf T$ denote the modular generators. Working under the analytic assumptions of the topological recursion and exact WKB constructions, we compare Stokes multipliers of the associated isomonodromy system while tracking the homology basis of its elliptic spectral curve under rotations of the independent variable. For the sectors considered, we identify the known parameter transformation induced by an $8\pi/5$ rotation with the modular $T$-action and derive a new explicit parameter relation realizing the $S$-action for a $2\pi/5$ rotation. We also determine the multiplicative factors in the corresponding tau-function relations, including their normalization constants. Together, these results give an explicit realization of single-valuedness after one full turn around infinity for both the Painlev\'e transcendent and its tau function, with the tau-function prefactors cancelling by Abel's five-term identity for the Rogers dilogarithm.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-10-30: 1 request, 5,239 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.52 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.40 · compares with prior results 0.48 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

For the first Painlev\'e equation, we relate three nonlinear Stokes maps associated with a full turn around infinity to modular transformations of the two-parameter tau function through the identity $\boldsymbol S_\pi\circ\boldsymbol S_0\circ \boldsymbol S_{-\pi}=\mathsf S\circ\mathsf T$. Here the subscripts label Borel directions, while $\mathsf S$ and $\mathsf T$ denote the modular generators. Working under the analytic assumptions of the topological recursion and exact WKB constructions, we compare Stokes multipliers of the associated isomonodromy system while tracking the homology basis of its elliptic spectral curve under rotations of the independent variable. For the sectors considered, we identify the known parameter transformation induced by an $8\pi/5$ rotation with the modular $T$-action and derive a new explicit parameter relation realizing the $S$-action for a $2\pi/5$ rotation. We also determine the multiplicative factors in the corresponding tau-function relations, including their normalization constants. Together, these results give an explicit realization of single-valuedness after one full turn around infinity for both the Painlev\'e transcendent and its tau function, with the tau-function prefactors cancelling by Abel's five-term identity for the Rogers dilogarithm.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	For the first Painlev\'e equation, we relate three nonlinear Stokes maps associated with a full turn around infinity to modular transformations of the two-parameter tau function through the identity $\boldsymbol S_\pi\circ\boldsymbol S_0\circ \boldsymbol S_{-\pi}=\mathsf S\circ\mathsf T$.	result 0.89	0.92	0.76	asserted 1.00
s1	Here the subscripts label Borel directions, while $\mathsf S$ and $\mathsf T$ denote the modular generators.	background 0.53	0.27	0.04	asserted 0.92
s2	Working under the analytic assumptions of the topological recursion and exact WKB constructions, we compare Stokes multipliers of the associated isomonodromy system while tracking the homology basis of its elliptic spectral curve under rotations of the independent variable.	method 0.98	0.89	0.04	asserted 0.96
s3	For the sectors considered, we identify the known parameter transformation induced by an $8\pi/5$ rotation with the modular $T$-action and derive a new explicit parameter relation realizing the $S$-action for a $2\pi/5$ rotation.	result 0.92	0.92	0.18	asserted 1.00
s4	We also determine the multiplicative factors in the corresponding tau-function relations, including their normalization constants.	result 0.89	0.95	0.05	asserted 1.00
s5	Together, these results give an explicit realization of single-valuedness after one full turn around infinity for both the Painlev\'e transcendent and its tau function, with the tau-function prefactors cancelling by Abel's five-term identity for the Rogers dilogarithm.	result 0.78	0.91	0.68	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 2.** 1: Stokes automorphisms on sheet −1 (left) and the principal sheet (right), for the background (2.2). The subscripts are the continuously followed angles of xe = z −5/4 . The displayed automorphisms act for clockwise crossings; counterclockwise crossings use their inverses. Blue and orange denote forward and backward Stokes directions, and red dotted rays are antiStokes directions. Crossing the branch cut clockwise takes sheet 0 to sheet −1 and interchanges the projected Stokes and anti-Stokes directions. transseries parameters is [20, 10, 12] ν = α 2 µ, e2πiρ = ρπ = −i √ π √ −α

**Figure 3.** 2: Linear Stokes graphs at zp and z ′ p . As mentioned in the main text, equation (3.6) describes the relation between the Torelli marking (A, B) of the Stokes graph obtained by rotating the graph in (i) by +4π/5 and the Torelli marking (A′ , B′ ) of the Stokes graph in (ii)

**Figure 4.** 1: One counterclockwise turn, drawn with ϵ = π/10, from arg zp = −6π/5 + ϵ. The path starts on sheet −1, crosses the branch cut, and continues on sheet 0. It crosses the Stokes directions π, 0, and −π in that order. The intermediate point is z1 = e 2πi/5 zp, and the endpoint is zpe 2πi . The S relation is used in the chamber established in Section 3.3: zp and z1 have the Stokes line at arg z = −4π/5 between them. We can now compare the two descriptions of the full turn in (4.5) and (4.6). On the modular side, the parameter maps (4.2) compose directly. On the resurgent side, (2.8) and

Showing 3 of the paper's 4 figures. See all figures in the PDF ↗ Figures reproduced from arXiv:2610.38584 by the authors.

References

Works cited (21)

[20]

N. Tamarin,Resurgence, monodromy, and cluster algebras along the Painlev´ e I KdV hier- archy, PhD thesis, Instituto Superior T´ ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa (2026)

View on Pith 2026
[10]

J. Kager, J. Rodrigues, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,Exact Solutions to Matrix Models and String Theories: The Global Construction, to appear (2026)

View on Pith 2026
[12]

J. Kager, J. Rodrigues, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,From Resurgence to Monodromy Along the KdV Hierarchy, to appear (2026)

View on Pith 2026
[1]

I. Aniceto, R. Schiappa and M. Vonk,The resurgence of instantons in string theory, Com- mun. Number Theory Phys.6(2012), 339–496; arXiv:1106.5922

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012
[2]

S. Baldino, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and R. Vega,Resurgent Stokes Data for Painlev´ e Equa- tions and Two-Dimensional Quantum (Super) Gravity, Commun. Number Theory Phys.17 (2023), 385–552; doi:10.4310/cntp.2023.v17.n2.a5; arXiv:2203.13726

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[3]

G. Bonelli, O. Lisovyy, K. Maruyoshi, A. Sciarappa and A. Tanzini,On Painlev´ e/gauge theory correspondence, Lett. Math. Phys.107(2017), 2359–2413; arXiv:1612.06235

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[4]

B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion, Com- mun. Number Theory Phys.1(2007), 347–452; arXiv:math-ph/0702045. 29

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007
[5]

J. Gu and M. Mari˜ no,Exact multi-instantons in topological string theory, SciPost Phys.15 (2023), 179; doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.179; arXiv:2211.01403

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023
[6]

N. Iorgov, K. Iwaki, O. Lisovyy and Yu. Zhuravlov,Many-faced Painlev´ e I: irregular confor- mal blocks, topological recursion, and holomorphic anomaly approaches, arXiv:2505.16803 (2025)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025
[7]

N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy, N. Tamarin and Yu. Zhuravlov,Painlev´ e II connection problem revisited, arXiv:2610.28227 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[8]

K. Iwaki,2-parameterτ-function for the first Painlev´ e equation: Topological recursion and direct monodromy problem via exact WKB analysis, Commun. Math. Phys.377(2020), 1047–1098; arXiv:1902.06439 (2019)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020
[9]

K. Iwaki and M. Mari˜ no,Resurgent Structure of the Topological String and the First Painlev´ e Equation, SIGMA20(2024), 028, 21 pages; doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2024.028; arXiv:2307.02080

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024
[11]

J. Kager, J. Rodrigues, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,Exact Solutions to Matrix Models and String Theories: The Local Construction, arXiv:2602.15101 (2026)

View on Pith arXiv 2026
[13]

A. A. Kapaev,Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the Painlev´ e first equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.37(2004), 11149–11167; arXiv:nlin/0404026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004
[14]

A. A. Kapaev and A. V. Kitaev,Connection formulae for the first Painlev´ e transcendent in the complex domain, Lett. Math. Phys.27(1993), 243–252; doi:10.1007/BF00777371

View on Pith doi:10.1007/bf00777371 1993
[15]

O. Lisovyy and J. Roussillon,On the connection problem for Painlev´ e I, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.50(2017), 255202; arXiv:1612.08382

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017
[16]

M. Mari˜ no, R. Schiappa and M. Schwick,New Instantons for Matrix Models, arXiv:2210.13479

View on Pith Pith review arXiv
[17]

R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,All the D-Branes of Resurgence, SciPost Phys. 20(2026), 135; arXiv:2301.05214

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026
[18]

Y. Takei,On the connection formula for the first Painlev´ e equation—from the viewpoint of the exact WKB analysis, RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku931(1995), 70–99; PDF

View on Pith 1995
[19]

Y. Takei,An explicit description of the connection formula for the first Painlev´ e equation, inToward the Exact WKB Analysis of Differential Equations, Linear or Non-Linear, Kyoto University Press, Kyoto (2000), 271–296

View on Pith 2000
[21]

A. van Spaendonck and M. Vonk,Painlev´ e I and exact WKB: Stokes phenomenon for two-parameter transseries, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55(2022), 454003; arXiv:2204.09062. 30

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [20]

N. Tamarin,Resurgence, monodromy, and cluster algebras along the Painlev´ e I KdV hier- archy, PhD thesis, Instituto Superior T´ ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa (2026)

View on Pith 2026

[2] [10]

J. Kager, J. Rodrigues, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,Exact Solutions to Matrix Models and String Theories: The Global Construction, to appear (2026)

View on Pith 2026

[3] [12]

J. Kager, J. Rodrigues, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,From Resurgence to Monodromy Along the KdV Hierarchy, to appear (2026)

View on Pith 2026

[4] [1]

I. Aniceto, R. Schiappa and M. Vonk,The resurgence of instantons in string theory, Com- mun. Number Theory Phys.6(2012), 339–496; arXiv:1106.5922

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2012

[5] [2]

S. Baldino, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and R. Vega,Resurgent Stokes Data for Painlev´ e Equa- tions and Two-Dimensional Quantum (Super) Gravity, Commun. Number Theory Phys.17 (2023), 385–552; doi:10.4310/cntp.2023.v17.n2.a5; arXiv:2203.13726

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[6] [3]

G. Bonelli, O. Lisovyy, K. Maruyoshi, A. Sciarappa and A. Tanzini,On Painlev´ e/gauge theory correspondence, Lett. Math. Phys.107(2017), 2359–2413; arXiv:1612.06235

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[7] [4]

B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion, Com- mun. Number Theory Phys.1(2007), 347–452; arXiv:math-ph/0702045. 29

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2007

[8] [5]

J. Gu and M. Mari˜ no,Exact multi-instantons in topological string theory, SciPost Phys.15 (2023), 179; doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.179; arXiv:2211.01403

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2023

[9] [6]

N. Iorgov, K. Iwaki, O. Lisovyy and Yu. Zhuravlov,Many-faced Painlev´ e I: irregular confor- mal blocks, topological recursion, and holomorphic anomaly approaches, arXiv:2505.16803 (2025)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2025

[10] [7]

N. Iorgov, O. Lisovyy, N. Tamarin and Yu. Zhuravlov,Painlev´ e II connection problem revisited, arXiv:2610.28227 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[11] [8]

K. Iwaki,2-parameterτ-function for the first Painlev´ e equation: Topological recursion and direct monodromy problem via exact WKB analysis, Commun. Math. Phys.377(2020), 1047–1098; arXiv:1902.06439 (2019)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2020

[12] [9]

K. Iwaki and M. Mari˜ no,Resurgent Structure of the Topological String and the First Painlev´ e Equation, SIGMA20(2024), 028, 21 pages; doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2024.028; arXiv:2307.02080

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2024

[13] [11]

J. Kager, J. Rodrigues, R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,Exact Solutions to Matrix Models and String Theories: The Local Construction, arXiv:2602.15101 (2026)

View on Pith arXiv 2026

[14] [13]

A. A. Kapaev,Quasi-linear Stokes phenomenon for the Painlev´ e first equation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.37(2004), 11149–11167; arXiv:nlin/0404026

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2004

[15] [14]

A. A. Kapaev and A. V. Kitaev,Connection formulae for the first Painlev´ e transcendent in the complex domain, Lett. Math. Phys.27(1993), 243–252; doi:10.1007/BF00777371

View on Pith doi:10.1007/bf00777371 1993

[16] [15]

O. Lisovyy and J. Roussillon,On the connection problem for Painlev´ e I, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.50(2017), 255202; arXiv:1612.08382

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2017

[17] [16]

M. Mari˜ no, R. Schiappa and M. Schwick,New Instantons for Matrix Models, arXiv:2210.13479

View on Pith Pith review arXiv

[18] [17]

R. Schiappa, M. Schwick and N. Tamarin,All the D-Branes of Resurgence, SciPost Phys. 20(2026), 135; arXiv:2301.05214

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2026

[19] [18]

Y. Takei,On the connection formula for the first Painlev´ e equation—from the viewpoint of the exact WKB analysis, RIMS Kˆ okyˆ uroku931(1995), 70–99; PDF

View on Pith 1995

[20] [19]

Y. Takei,An explicit description of the connection formula for the first Painlev´ e equation, inToward the Exact WKB Analysis of Differential Equations, Linear or Non-Linear, Kyoto University Press, Kyoto (2000), 271–296

View on Pith 2000

[21] [21]

A. van Spaendonck and M. Vonk,Painlev´ e I and exact WKB: Stokes phenomenon for two-parameter transseries, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55(2022), 454003; arXiv:2204.09062. 30

View on Pith Pith review arXiv 2022