Quantum Relative Entropy and Information Flux Resolve Wavefunction Collapse in Spacelike-Separated QED Waveguides

Tai Hyun Yoon

REVIEW

Quantum Relative Entropy and Information Flux Resolve Wavefunction Collapse in Spacelike-Separated QED Waveguides

Tai Hyun Yoon

Quantum Physics · Submitted 5 Nov 2026 · 47 references

Pith's verdict: The optics inside is mostly sound, but the AQFT bridge is asserted rather than derived, and the collapse claims ride on that bridge.

T0 · AI review

How this review was made: An AI referee (deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash) read the paper on November 6, 2026 and answered a fixed list of questions about it. T0 is the starting level every paper gets. The levels describe how deeply Pith has checked the paper, never the authors.

T0 AI review An AI read the paper and answered a fixed list of questions.
T1 Audit Automatic checks that the references and files the paper relies on exist and match.
T2 Compute The paper's code or calculations re-run with the same results.
T3 Formal statement The claims written out in a formal math language a computer can read.
T4 Proof Those claims proved, and the proof checked by computer.

How Pith checks papers →

· 5 major objections · 4 minor · Ask about this paper · The compiled record · Read the full review →

Challenge this review Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

arXiv ID2611.08000 (version 1)

Pith IDYKVNOIQ6, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review

CitationTai Hyun Yoon. "Quantum Relative Entropy and Information Flux Resolve Wavefunction Collapse in Spacelike-Separated QED Waveguides." arXiv:2611.08000 (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YKVNOIQ6

Cite this reviewBibTeX for Pith's review of this paper

Claim paper

Why Pith says this

Highlight any text to comment on it.

Editor's note

read the letter

Plain take: I agree with the reader's verdict — reject as stated. The paper has a real, known quantum-optics core: the SPACS overlap F = |α|²/(1+|α|²), the complementarity triality P²+E²+V²=1, and the exponential coherence decay of the Lindblad solution are all standard, and the S2 manipulations of the two-path density matrix are consistent. If this were framed as a dictionary between AQFT relative entropy and seeded ENBS interferometry, with the dephasing rate treated as an input, it would be a modest but usable contribution.

The problem is the load-bearing step, and it is not a small one. Eq. (8) is presented as a derivation, but it depends on S1 item 4's assertion that Srel(ω0∥ωα)=2πτc|α|², which is stated without evaluating Eq. (7). No mode profile or wavepacket appears, and for a strictly monochromatic cw field the U-integral needs a coherence window that is itself introduced ad hoc. Once Srel is proportional to |α|², Eq. (8) is algebraically forced and relative entropy carries no independent content. Eq. (11) is the same move: Γdeph is defined so that γ(Lc)=F, so Eq. (12) restates the assumed decay rather than deriving dephasing from information flux. I also cannot check the Scholes quotient equivalence because it rests on three preprints, and the author's own preprints carry several load-bearing steps. This does not mean the claims are false; it means the paper does not establish them.

The GKP section is mostly a restatement of earlier work and does not add evidence. There is no code, data, or new falsifiable prediction. The concluding claim to have solved the measurement problem is an overstatement relative to what is actually shown.

Who this is for: someone working on SPACS and induced coherence might mine the triality and overlap results, but they should cite the original sources. As a resolution of collapse, it is not ready. My recommendation: send it to a serious referee rather than desk-reject, because the underlying optics is checkable and the gap is precisely identifiable; ask the referee to demand a real derivation of Srel or an explicit statement that Eq. (8) is a postulate. Without that, reject.

What would settle it

Measure the bright-port interference visibility and the spatial coherence profile of the reduced signal state as functions of the seed amplitude $|\alpha|^2$ inside the crystal. The central identities predict $V = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$ at the crystal exit, an exponential coherence decay $\gamma(z) = e^{-2\Gamma_{\mathrm{deph}}z}$ with $\Gamma_{\mathrm{deph}} = \ln(1+1/|\alpha|^2)/(2L_c)$, and a total information loss $H_{\mathrm{bin}}((1+F)/2)$; at $|\alpha|^2 = 1$ the theory demands $V = 0.5$ and $\Gamma_{\mathrm{deph}}L_c = \tfrac{1}{2}\ln 2$. A measured visibility curve that does not follow $|\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$, or a coherence decay whose rate disagrees with $\ln(1+1/|\alpha|^2)/(2L_c)$, would falsify the claimed link between quantum relative entropy and spatial dephasing, even though the SPACS overlap formula is a standard result on its own.

Referee report

Significance

If the central claims were established, the paper would provide a striking bridge between AQFT horizon thermodynamics and tabletop quantum optics, with consequences for complementarity, decoherence, and bosonic error correction. There are genuine strengths: Sec. S2's computation of Srel(ρs||ρmix), Eqs. (S2)-(S5), is standard and appears correct; the triality identity Eq. (9) is standard; the AQFT result Eq. (7) is properly attributed to the published Ref. [11]; and the experimental geometry, including the microcausality condition Eq. (1), is clearly specified. However, the central connection is not derived. S1 item 4 states the value Srel=2πτc|α|^2 in one sentence, Eq. (8) then makes F algebraically reduce to |α|^2/(1+|α|^2), and Eq. (11) defines Γdeph from F so that S2's Lindblad solution reaches γ(Lc)=F by construction. The collapse-resolution claim rests on this unsupported dictionary and on unpublished preprints. As presented, the paper does not establish its main predictions; it imposes them.

Major objections (5)

[Sec. S1 item 4; Eq. (8)] The central identification Srel(ω0||ω_α)=2πτc|α|^2 is asserted, not derived from Eq. (7). For a strictly monochromatic cw field, the U-integral in Eq. (7) requires a finite-duration test profile φ(U); no mode profile, no dilation derivative, and no integration are shown, and the coherence window τc is introduced ad hoc. Once this value is inserted, F = Srel/(2πτc + Srel) = |α|^2/(1+|α|^2) follows by pure algebra after τc cancels, so Eq. (8) carries no independent predictive content from quantum relative entropy. The paper's own sentence b87 says the integral 'evaluates exactly to' this value, but no evaluation is exhibited.
[Eq. (8); Eq. (6)] Eq. (8) also identifies F with the SPACS overlap |<m2|m1>| for the states defined in Eq. (6), but no computation of this overlap is provided. For equal SPACS in the same mode the overlap is unity, and for SPACS in independent idler modes the overlap contains vacuum-displacement factors such as e^{-|α|^2}; neither standard reading obviously gives |α|^2/(1+|α|^2). The sentence 'after tracing over the shared seed reservoir' does not specify the traced object or the resulting effective inner product, so the first equality in Eq. (8) is not established.
[Eqs. (10)-(12); Sec. S2] The spatial dephasing rate is not derived from tracing out the idler reservoir. In Sec. S2, Eq. (S1) postulates γ(z)=exp(-2Γdeph z) and the boundary condition γ(Lc)=F(α); Eq. (11) is exactly the relation needed to enforce that boundary condition. The derivative computation leading to Eq. (12) and the integral in Eq. (S5) then express Jinfo in terms of Γdeph, which was itself defined from the assumed F. Thus Eq. (12), presented as the QED analog of the AQFT horizon flux law, is a restatement of the assumed decoherence factor rather than an independent result of tracing out the idler continuum.
[Sec. S1 item 3; Eq. (12)] The dictionary that maps the null-sheet retarded coordinate U and the affine dilation generator exactly to the longitudinal coordinate z along a PPLN waveguide is asserted, not derived. Eq. (7) is a QFT statement about local horizons with specific modular structure; its application to a finite-length, dispersive, cw-seeded nonlinear waveguide requires a derivation of the effective symplectic form, the wavepacket profile, and the relevant energy flux. Without such a derivation, the statements that Eq. (12) is an 'exact manifestation' and an 'exact QED analog' of the AQFT flux law are not supported.
[Sec. S3; Eq. (S6)] The collapse-resolution argument depends on the quotient-space equivalence of Eq. (S6), taken from refs. [27], [46], and [47], all of which are arXiv preprints whose relevance to this specific SPFC/SPACS setup is not independently established. Even if the coset equivalence is accepted, Eqs. (15)-(17) are a local conditional state update after a bright-port measurement; they do not by themselves prove that nonlocal collapse is 'rigorously resolved' or that the century-long measurement problem is solved. The conclusion drawn from these equations is disproportionate to what the formalism establishes.

Minor objections (4)

[Eq. (8)] The dimensions in Eq. (8) are not consistent as written: Srel is called dimensionless, but the expression 2πτc|α|^2 has dimensions of time unless a normalization timescale is specified. The authors should state the units or normalization of τc.
[Sec. S3] The symbol F is used both for the overlap fidelity in Eq. (8) and for the free vector space in Sec. S3; a different symbol for the free vector space would avoid confusion.
[References] Several load-bearing references ([25], [26], [27], [28], [33], [46], [47]) are unpublished arXiv preprints, several by the author. For the central dictionary and the quotient-collapse argument, published or independently verified sources, or proofs within the manuscript, would be needed.
[Throughout] The word 'exact' is used very liberally ('exact spatial Lindblad master equation', 'exact manifestation', 'exact QED analog'). Given the circularity described above, this language should be tempered to match what is actually derived.

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

The paper

The paper claims

This paper claims that quantum relative entropy exactly fixes the entanglement deficit and dephasing rate in coherently seeded twin waveguides, and that a coset projection resolves nonlocal collapse into purely local events.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that one quantity—quantum relative entropy, the information-theoretic distance between two quantum states—governs the flow of energy and information across causal boundaries in quantum field theory and also the emergence of definite outcomes in a laboratory photonics experiment. The proposed realization is a pair of spacelike-separated nonlinear waveguides pumped by an optical frequency comb and seeded by a continuous-wave laser; during each ultrashort pump pulse the two crystal interaction volumes are strictly spacelike-separated, and the seed creates single-photon-added coherent states whose overlap fidelity $F = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$ is claimed to be fixed by the seed's quantum relative entropy. Tracing out the unmeasured idler field yields a spatial Lindblad master equation with dephasing rate $\Gamma_{\mathrm{deph}}(\alpha) = -(1/(2L_c))\ln F(\alpha)$, and the derivative of the relative entropy along the crystal is a non-negative information flux that the paper identifies as the optical analogue of an algebraic-QFT horizon flux law. A quotient-space (coset) description of the tensor product is then used to argue that projective measurement is a purely local operation, resolving the long-standing puzzle of nonlocal wavefunction collapse without superluminal signaling. If this identification holds, tabletop quantum optics becomes a testbed for information-theoretic laws of spacetime, and the same relative-entropy formula bounds the fidelity of hardware-native time–frequency GKP error correction.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on three interlocking objects. First, the single-photon-added coherent state $|m\rangle = \hat{a}^\dagger|\alpha\rangle/\sqrt{1+|\alpha|^2}$, whose non-orthogonality between the two arms gives the overlap fidelity $F = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$; this one number enters the visibility, the dephasing rate, the entanglement, and the GKP syndrome bound. Second, the Weyl–symplectic structure of the smeared QED fields, which supports the dictionary $S_{\mathrm{rel}}(\omega_0\|\omega_\alpha) = 2\pi\tau_c|\alpha|^2$ between the abstract null-sheet relative entropy and the photon flux of the continuous-wave seed, with the coherence window $\tau_c$ as the conversion constant. Third, the quotient-space tensor product of Sec. S3, under which phase equivalences $(e^{i\theta}\psi_s,\psi_i) \sim (\psi_s, e^{i\theta}\psi_i)$ make the detector projection a local coset selection governed by the single invariant gauge phase $\Delta\Phi = \Delta\phi_s - \Delta\phi_p + \Delta\phi_{sd}$. The spatial Lindblad equation (10) and the flux identity (12) weld the first two objects together: dephasing along the crystal axis is the negative derivative of the relative entropy between the reduced state and its fully dephased mixture, with non-negative coherence-divergence kernel $G_{\mathrm{coh}}$, and the whole structure is claimed to be the exact optical realization of the algebraic-QFT horizon flux law.

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the quantum relative entropy of a continuous-wave coherent seed is the exact measure of the entanglement deficit in a dual-crystal entangled biphoton source, and that this same quantity drives spatial dephasing and resolves wavefunction collapse. Injecting the coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$ acts as a Weyl displacement on the QED vacuum, turning the idler modes into single-photon-added coherent states whose overlap fidelity $F = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$ is presented as equal to the single-photon interference visibility $V$ and to the ratio $S_{\mathrm{rel}}/(2\pi\tau_c + S_{\mathrm{rel}})$. Tracing over the unmeasured idler continuum gives an exact spatial Lindblad master equation with dephasing rate $\Gamma_{\mathrm{deph}} = -(1/(2L_c))\ln F$, and the identity $J_{\mathrm{info}}(z) = -\frac{d}{dz}S_{\mathrm{rel}}(\hat{\rho}_s(z)\|\hat{\rho}_{\mathrm{mix}}) = 2\Gamma_{\mathrm{deph}}G_{\mathrm{coh}} \ge 0$ reproduces the structure of the horizon flux law in Ref. [11]. The paper then shows, through quotient measurement theory, that the bright-port detector projection selects a conditional coset slice of the joint signal–idler state, yielding the counting rate $R_B(\Delta\Phi) = \tfrac{1}{2}[1 + V\cos(\Delta\Phi)]$ and the three-scan equivalence, so that collapse is local self-interference of a coset representative rather than a disturbance acting at a distance. Throughout, the wave-particle-entanglement triality $P^2+E^2+V^2=1$ is saturated, and the same symplectic form generates commuting TF-GKP stabilizers whose syndrome fidelity is bounded by $1-F(\alpha) = 1/(1+|\alpha|^2)$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the stated, not derived, identification of the abstract relative entropy of a coherent excitation with the photon flux of a continuous-wave seed over a coherence window, $S_{\mathrm{rel}}(\omega_0\|\omega_\alpha) = 2\pi\tau_c|\alpha|^2$; if that dictionary is only an analogy, the predicted fidelity, dephasing rate, and collapse resolution do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A seeded dual-crystal interferometer would measure in the laboratory the same relative-entropy flux that the cited AQFT derivation [11] uses to obtain the semiclassical Einstein equations, turning horizon entropy laws into photonic observables.
The bright-port visibility follows $V = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$ without postselection, so the triality $P^2+E^2+V^2=1$ is saturated continuously as the seed grows, converting vacuum entanglement into single-photon temporal coherence.
Collapse in spacelike-separated pairs is predicted to be a local coset projection, and the three-scan equivalence means scanning the pump phase, the seed phase, or the readout phase produces identical fringes.
Time–frequency GKP syndrome readout fidelity is bounded by $1-F(\alpha) = 1/(1+|\alpha|^2)$, directly tying bosonic error-correction quality to the coherent seed's relative entropy.
The total information lost along a crystal is $H_{\mathrm{bin}}((1+F)/2)$, an entropy budget capped by $\ln 2$, which is a specific number an experiment can check.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

My inference: if the dictionary $S_{\mathrm{rel}} = 2\pi\tau_c|\alpha|^2$ is right, then the coherence window $\tau_c$ becomes an experimentally calibratable constant connecting laser photon number to horizon entropy, so a calibrated visibility measurement would turn the interferometer into an entropy metrology device; the paper itself does not discuss calibration.
My inference: the coset-projection logic should apply to every conditional measurement of the same architecture—dark-port counting, idler-side detection, and postselected coincidence—predicting the same invariant phase combination $\Delta\Phi$; the paper only exhibits the bright-port case.
My inference: if relative entropy, rather than the SPACS form specifically, fixes dephasing, then other Weyl-type excitations (squeezed or pulsed seeds) should produce a family of fidelity laws generalizing $F = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$, and testing that family would separate the general principle from the particular state.

Original abstract

Resolving how first-order quantum coherence and definite measurement outcomes emerge from entangled vacuum fluctuations across spacelike-separated regions is unified here by the principle that quantum relative entropy governs the energy-information flux across causal boundaries [P.~Dorau and A.~Much, Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~\textbf{136}, 091602 (2026)]. We establish the exact quantum-optical realization of this principle using dual, spacelike-separated entangled nonlinear biphoton sources implemented in quantum electrodynamics waveguides pumped by an optical frequency comb and seeded by a continuous-wave laser in a coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$. We demonstrate that single-photon-added coherent states (SPACS) generated via coherent seeding possess a quantum relative entropy that precisely quantifies the entanglement deficit between signal and idler fields. Tracing over the unmeasured idler continuum yields an exact spatial Lindblad master equation along the propagation axis, proving that spatial dephasing is driven by an information divergence flux determined by the SPACS overlap fidelity $F = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$. Uniting this relative-entropy flow with quotient measurement theory (detailed in Section~S3 of the Supplemental Material), we rigorously resolve nonlocal wavefunction collapse into local coset projections---explaining macroscopic state reduction without superluminal signaling. This exact open-system framework simultaneously saturates the wave-particle-entanglement triality [T.~H.~Yoon and M.~Cho, Sci.~Adv.~\textbf{7}, eabi9268 (2021)] and anchors hardware-native time--frequency Gottesman--Kitaev--Preskill stabilizers to the comb symplectic structure.

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-11-06: 1 request, 5,494 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.09 · states limitation 0.09 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.48 · compares with prior results 0.39 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

Resolving how first-order quantum coherence and definite measurement outcomes emerge from entangled vacuum fluctuations across spacelike-separated regions is unified here by the principle that quantum relative entropy governs the energy-information flux across causal boundaries [P.~Dorau and A.~Much, Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~\textbf{136}, 091602 (2026)]. We establish the exact quantum-optical realization of this principle using dual, spacelike-separated entangled nonlinear biphoton sources implemented in quantum electrodynamics waveguides pumped by an optical frequency comb and seeded by a continuous-wave laser in a coherent state $|\alpha\rangle$. We demonstrate that single-photon-added coherent states (SPACS) generated via coherent seeding possess a quantum relative entropy that precisely quantifies the entanglement deficit between signal and idler fields. Tracing over the unmeasured idler continuum yields an exact spatial Lindblad master equation along the propagation axis, proving that spatial dephasing is driven by an information divergence flux determined by the SPACS overlap fidelity $F = |\alpha|^2/(1+|\alpha|^2)$. Uniting this relative-entropy flow with quotient measurement theory (detailed in Section~S3 of the Supplemental Material), we rigorously resolve nonlocal wavefunction collapse into local coset projections---explaining macroscopic state reduction without superluminal signaling. This exact open-system framework simultaneously saturates the wave-particle-entanglement triality [T.~H.~Yoon and M.~Cho, Sci.~Adv.~\textbf{7}, eabi9268 (2021)] and anchors hardware-native time--frequency Gottesman--Kitaev--Preskill stabilizers to the comb symplectic structure.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	Resolving how first-order quantum coherence and definite measurement outcomes emerge from entangled vacuum fluctuations across spacelike-separated regions is unified here by the principle that quantum relative entropy governs the energy-information flux across causal boundaries [P.~Dorau and A.~Much, Phys.~Rev.~Lett.~\textbf{136}, 091602 (2026)].	contribution 0.61	0.57	0.82	asserted 1.00
s1	We establish the exact quantum-optical realization of this principle using dual, spacelike-separated entangled nonlinear biphoton sources implemented in quantum electrodynamics waveguides pumped by an optical frequency comb and seeded by a continuous-wave laser in a coherent state $\|\alpha\rangle$.	method 0.85	0.90	0.07	asserted 1.00
s2	We demonstrate that single-photon-added coherent states (SPACS) generated via coherent seeding possess a quantum relative entropy that precisely quantifies the entanglement deficit between signal and idler fields.	result 0.95	0.87	0.08	asserted 1.00
s3	Tracing over the unmeasured idler continuum yields an exact spatial Lindblad master equation along the propagation axis, proving that spatial dephasing is driven by an information divergence flux determined by the SPACS overlap fidelity $F = \|\alpha\|^2/(1+\|\alpha\|^2)$.	result 0.94	0.88	0.09	asserted 1.00
s4	Uniting this relative-entropy flow with quotient measurement theory (detailed in Section~S3 of the Supplemental Material), we rigorously resolve nonlocal wavefunction collapse into local coset projections---explaining macroscopic state reduction without superluminal signaling.	interpretation 0.87	0.82	0.62	asserted 1.00
s5	This exact open-system framework simultaneously saturates the wave-particle-entanglement triality [T.~H.~Yoon and M.~Cho, Sci.~Adv.~\textbf{7}, eabi9268 (2021)] and anchors hardware-native time--frequency Gottesman--Kitaev--Preskill stabilizers to the comb symplectic structure.	result 0.55	0.66	0.14	asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.99 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.98.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v1

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

Figures

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. Schematic of the dual-crystal entangled nonlinear biphoton source (ENBS) architecture realizing

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Theoretical scaling and spatial dynamics of open-system decoherence and relative-entropy information

Figures reproduced from arXiv:2611.08000 by the authors.

References

Works cited (47)

[11]

P. Dorau and A. Much, From quantum relative entropy to the semiclassical Einstein equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 091602 (2026)

View on Pith 2026
[27]

G. D. Scholes, Measurements on the separated subsystems of an entangled state, arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.04178 10.48550/arXiv.2609.04178 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.04178 2026
[46]

G. D. Scholes, Mechanism of wavefunction collapse in measurements of separated quantum subsystems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20111 10.48550/arXiv.2605.20111 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.20111 2026
[47]

G. D. Scholes, Measurement of quantum states and nonlocal correlations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.21243 10.48550/arXiv.2605.21243 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21243 2026
[1]

N. Bohr, The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, Nature121, 580 (1928)

View on Pith 1928
[2]

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev.47, 777 (1935)

View on Pith 1935
[3]

B.-G. Englert, Fringe visibility and which-way information: An inequality, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 2154 (1996)

View on Pith 1996
[4]

J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika1, 195 (1964)

View on Pith 1964
[5]

N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 419 (2014)

View on Pith 2014
[6]

H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum measurement and control, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

View on Pith 2010
[7]

T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260 (1995)

View on Pith 1995
[8]

H. Casini, Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound, Class. Quantum Grav.25, 205021 (2008)

View on Pith 2008
[9]

S. Hollands and A. Ishibashi, News versus information, Class. Quantum Grav.36, 195001 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[10]

F. Kurpicz, N. Pinamonti, and R. Verch, Temperature and entropy-area relation of quantum matter near spherically symmetric outer trapping horizons, Lett. Math. Phys.111, 110 (2021)

View on Pith 2021
[12]

H. Araki, Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.11, 809 (1976)

View on Pith 1976
[13]

A. Uhlmann, Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory, Commun. Math. Phys.54, 21 (1977). 15

View on Pith 1977
[14]

H. Casini, S. Grillo, and D. Pontello, Relative entropy for coherent states from Araki formula, Phys. Rev. D99, 125020 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[15]

R. Longo, Entropy of coherent excitations, Lett. Math. Phys.109, 2587 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[16]

X. Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 318 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[17]

L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence without induced emission, Phys. Rev. A44, 4614 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[18]

Z. Y. Ou, X. Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel, Observation of nonclassical effects in the interference of photons from two independent sources, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 321 (1990)

View on Pith 1990
[19]

A. Heuer, R. Menzel, and A. Perez-Leija, Commutative and noncommutative quantum erasure with induced coherence, Phys. Rev. A92, 023832 (2015)

View on Pith 2015
[20]

S. K. Lee, N. S. Han, T. H. Yoon, and M. Cho, Frequency comb single-photon interferometry, Commun. Phys.1, 51 (2018)

View on Pith 2018
[21]

T. H. Yoon and M. Cho, Quantitative complementarity of wave-particle duality, Sci. Adv.7, eabi9268 (2021)

View on Pith 2021
[22]

T. W. Hänsch, Nobel lecture: Passion for precision, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 1297 (2006)

View on Pith 2006
[23]

J. L. Hall, Nobel lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 1279 (2006)

View on Pith 2006
[24]

A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light, Science306, 660 (2004)

View on Pith 2004
[25]

T. H. Yoon, Single-photon time qubit: Quantum-vacuum control and complementarity of the arrow of time, arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.27639 10.48550/arXiv.2610.27639 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.27639 2026
[26]

T. H. Yoon, Measurement-defined control of single-particle interference, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17767 10.48550/arXiv.2604.17767 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.17767 2026
[28]

T. H. Yoon, Resolving nonlocal state reduction via induced coherence in frequency-comb biphoton sources, arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.27602 10.48550/arXiv.2610.27602 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.27602 2026
[29]

D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

View on Pith 2001
[30]

C. Flühmann, T. R. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Nehra, J. Chiaverini, and J. P. Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator with continuous-variable error correction, Nature566, 513 (2019)

View on Pith 2019
[31]

N. Fabre, G. Maltese, F. Appas, S. Felicetti, A. Ketterer, A. Keller, T. Coudreau, F. Baboux, M. I. Amanti, S. Ducci, and P. Milman, Generation of a time-frequency Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill state in an integrated biphoton frequency comb, Phys. Rev. A102, 012607 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[32]

E. Descamps, A. Keller, and P. Milman, Time-frequency metrology and continuous-variable encoding, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 150801 (2024). 16

View on Pith 2024
[33]

T. H. Yoon, Hardware-native time-frequency Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill logical qubits in coherently seeded single-photon frequency combs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.14461 10.48550/arXiv.2602.14461 (2026)

View on Pith doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14461 2026
[34]

B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, Theorems on the uniqueness and thermal properties of stationary, nonsingular, quasifree states on spacetimes with a bifurcate Killing horizon, Phys. Rep.207, 49 (1991)

View on Pith 1991
[35]

Y. Bloch, The time qubit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07220 10.48550/arXiv.2511.07220 (2025)

View on Pith doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.07220 2025
[36]

S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972)

View on Pith 1972
[37]

A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental realization of einstein-podolsky-rosen-bohm Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 91 (1982)

View on Pith 1982
[38]

G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Violation of bell’s inequality under strict einstein locality conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5039 (1998)

View on Pith 1998
[39]

M. Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 128 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1970)

View on Pith 1970
[40]

J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, On the duality condition for a hermitian scalar field, J. Math. Phys.16, 985 (1975)

View on Pith 1975
[41]

M. Jakob and J. A. Bergou, Quantitative complementarity relations in bipartite systems: Entanglement as a physical reality, Opt. Commun.283, 827 (2010)

View on Pith 2010
[42]

X.-F. Qian, K. Konopka, and J. H. Eberly, Turning off quantum duality, Phys. Rev. Research2, 012016 (2020)

View on Pith 2020
[43]

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

View on Pith 1976
[44]

H. J. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993)

View on Pith 1993
[45]

S. J. Summers and R. Verch, Modular inclusion, the Hawking temperature, and quantum field theory in curved spacetime, Lett. Math. Phys.37, 145 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

Discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, highlight any passage above to comment on it, or challenge this review formally.

[1] [11]

P. Dorau and A. Much, From quantum relative entropy to the semiclassical Einstein equations, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 091602 (2026)

View on Pith 2026

[2] [27]

G. D. Scholes, Measurements on the separated subsystems of an entangled state, arXiv preprint arXiv:2609.04178 10.48550/arXiv.2609.04178 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.04178 2026

[3] [46]

G. D. Scholes, Mechanism of wavefunction collapse in measurements of separated quantum subsystems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.20111 10.48550/arXiv.2605.20111 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.20111 2026

[4] [47]

G. D. Scholes, Measurement of quantum states and nonlocal correlations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.21243 10.48550/arXiv.2605.21243 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.21243 2026

[5] [1]

N. Bohr, The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory, Nature121, 580 (1928)

View on Pith 1928

[6] [2]

A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?, Phys. Rev.47, 777 (1935)

View on Pith 1935

[7] [3]

B.-G. Englert, Fringe visibility and which-way information: An inequality, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 2154 (1996)

View on Pith 1996

[8] [4]

J. S. Bell, On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox, Physics Physique Fizika1, 195 (1964)

View on Pith 1964

[9] [5]

N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Bell nonlocality, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 419 (2014)

View on Pith 2014

[10] [6]

H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn, Quantum measurement and control, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

View on Pith 2010

[11] [7]

T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of spacetime: The Einstein equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260 (1995)

View on Pith 1995

[12] [8]

H. Casini, Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound, Class. Quantum Grav.25, 205021 (2008)

View on Pith 2008

[13] [9]

S. Hollands and A. Ishibashi, News versus information, Class. Quantum Grav.36, 195001 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[14] [10]

F. Kurpicz, N. Pinamonti, and R. Verch, Temperature and entropy-area relation of quantum matter near spherically symmetric outer trapping horizons, Lett. Math. Phys.111, 110 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

[15] [12]

H. Araki, Relative entropy of states of von Neumann algebras, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.11, 809 (1976)

View on Pith 1976

[16] [13]

A. Uhlmann, Relative entropy and the Wigner-Yanase-Dyson-Lieb concavity in an interpolation theory, Commun. Math. Phys.54, 21 (1977). 15

View on Pith 1977

[17] [14]

H. Casini, S. Grillo, and D. Pontello, Relative entropy for coherent states from Araki formula, Phys. Rev. D99, 125020 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[18] [15]

R. Longo, Entropy of coherent excitations, Lett. Math. Phys.109, 2587 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[19] [16]

X. Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence and indistinguishability in optical interference, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 318 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[20] [17]

L. J. Wang, X. Y. Zou, and L. Mandel, Induced coherence without induced emission, Phys. Rev. A44, 4614 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[21] [18]

Z. Y. Ou, X. Y. Zou, L. J. Wang, and L. Mandel, Observation of nonclassical effects in the interference of photons from two independent sources, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 321 (1990)

View on Pith 1990

[22] [19]

A. Heuer, R. Menzel, and A. Perez-Leija, Commutative and noncommutative quantum erasure with induced coherence, Phys. Rev. A92, 023832 (2015)

View on Pith 2015

[23] [20]

S. K. Lee, N. S. Han, T. H. Yoon, and M. Cho, Frequency comb single-photon interferometry, Commun. Phys.1, 51 (2018)

View on Pith 2018

[24] [21]

T. H. Yoon and M. Cho, Quantitative complementarity of wave-particle duality, Sci. Adv.7, eabi9268 (2021)

View on Pith 2021

[25] [22]

T. W. Hänsch, Nobel lecture: Passion for precision, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 1297 (2006)

View on Pith 2006

[26] [23]

J. L. Hall, Nobel lecture: Defining and measuring optical frequencies, Rev. Mod. Phys.78, 1279 (2006)

View on Pith 2006

[27] [24]

A. Zavatta, S. Viciani, and M. Bellini, Quantum-to-classical transition with single-photon-added coherent states of light, Science306, 660 (2004)

View on Pith 2004

[28] [25]

T. H. Yoon, Single-photon time qubit: Quantum-vacuum control and complementarity of the arrow of time, arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.27639 10.48550/arXiv.2610.27639 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.27639 2026

[29] [26]

T. H. Yoon, Measurement-defined control of single-particle interference, arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17767 10.48550/arXiv.2604.17767 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.17767 2026

[30] [28]

T. H. Yoon, Resolving nonlocal state reduction via induced coherence in frequency-comb biphoton sources, arXiv preprint arXiv:2610.27602 10.48550/arXiv.2610.27602 (2026)

View on Pith Pith review arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.27602 2026

[31] [29]

D. Gottesman, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Encoding a qubit in an oscillator, Phys. Rev. A64, 012310 (2001)

View on Pith 2001

[32] [30]

C. Flühmann, T. R. Nguyen, M. Marinelli, V. Nehra, J. Chiaverini, and J. P. Home, Encoding a qubit in a trapped-ion mechanical oscillator with continuous-variable error correction, Nature566, 513 (2019)

View on Pith 2019

[33] [31]

N. Fabre, G. Maltese, F. Appas, S. Felicetti, A. Ketterer, A. Keller, T. Coudreau, F. Baboux, M. I. Amanti, S. Ducci, and P. Milman, Generation of a time-frequency Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill state in an integrated biphoton frequency comb, Phys. Rev. A102, 012607 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[34] [32]

E. Descamps, A. Keller, and P. Milman, Time-frequency metrology and continuous-variable encoding, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 150801 (2024). 16

View on Pith 2024

[35] [33]

T. H. Yoon, Hardware-native time-frequency Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill logical qubits in coherently seeded single-photon frequency combs, arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.14461 10.48550/arXiv.2602.14461 (2026)

View on Pith doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14461 2026

[36] [34]

B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald, Theorems on the uniqueness and thermal properties of stationary, nonsingular, quasifree states on spacetimes with a bifurcate Killing horizon, Phys. Rep.207, 49 (1991)

View on Pith 1991

[37] [35]

Y. Bloch, The time qubit, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07220 10.48550/arXiv.2511.07220 (2025)

View on Pith doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.07220 2025

[38] [36]

S. J. Freedman and J. F. Clauser, Experimental test of local hidden-variable theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972)

View on Pith 1972

[39] [37]

A. Aspect, P. Grangier, and G. Roger, Experimental realization of einstein-podolsky-rosen-bohm Gedankenexperiment: A new violation of bell’s inequalities, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 91 (1982)

View on Pith 1982

[40] [38]

G. Weihs, T. Jennewein, C. Simon, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Violation of bell’s inequality under strict einstein locality conditions, Phys. Rev. Lett.81, 5039 (1998)

View on Pith 1998

[41] [39]

M. Takesaki,Tomita’s Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Applications, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 128 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1970)

View on Pith 1970

[42] [40]

J. J. Bisognano and E. H. Wichmann, On the duality condition for a hermitian scalar field, J. Math. Phys.16, 985 (1975)

View on Pith 1975

[43] [41]

M. Jakob and J. A. Bergou, Quantitative complementarity relations in bipartite systems: Entanglement as a physical reality, Opt. Commun.283, 827 (2010)

View on Pith 2010

[44] [42]

X.-F. Qian, K. Konopka, and J. H. Eberly, Turning off quantum duality, Phys. Rev. Research2, 012016 (2020)

View on Pith 2020

[45] [43]

G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Commun. Math. Phys.48, 119 (1976)

View on Pith 1976

[46] [44]

H. J. Carmichael,An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993)

View on Pith 1993

[47] [45]

S. J. Summers and R. Verch, Modular inclusion, the Hawking temperature, and quantum field theory in curved spacetime, Lett. Math. Phys.37, 145 (1996)

View on Pith 1996