Pith.

Quantum Algebra · arXiv:2611.12874 v1 · submitted 9 Nov 2026 · 75 references

FRT presentation of the q-Onsager comodule algebra and refined q-characters

Pascal Baseilhac, Azat M. Gainutdinov

PDF · arXiv · The abstract, sentence by sentence · Cite

The paper says

“We introduce a concept of counital comodule algebra (B,δB,εB) over a Hopf 𝕂-algebra H, where δB:B → B ⊗ H and εB:B → 𝕂 are coaction and counit homomorphisms, respectively.”

more of the abstract

This structure gives a canonical (counital) comodule algebra map ιB:B → H. In this paper, we study in details the case B = Oq, and H is the quantum loop algebra ℒUqsl2 for 𝕂 = ℂ. Here, Oq is the q-Onsager algebra with four presentations: (i) the q-Dolan-Grady type; (ii) the alternating type; (iii) the root vectors type; (iv) the Drinfeld type. For (Oq,δOq,εOq), in fact a 3-parameter family of counital comodule algebras, we establish a Faddeev-Reshetikhin-Takhtajan (FRT) type presentation, which is written in terms of a K-operator satisfying a reflection algebra relation. The coaction δOq (resp. ιOq) sends the K-operator to a `dressed' K-operator (resp. K-matrix) using Ding-Frenkel type L-operators of ℒUqsl2; the counit εOq sends the K-operator to the most general (non-diagonal) solution of the reflection equation. The FRT presentation allows to compute the image via δOq and ιOq of the generating functions of Oq for each presentation (ii)-(iv). Moreover, the images of Lu-Wang's generating functions of Oq in the so-called Drinfeld second realization DrℒUqsl2 are obtained, as well as their images via the (ordinary) coproduct of DrℒUqsl2, which enhance two theorems by Przeździecki. Finally, we apply our FRT presentation to the construction of new type q-characters for ℒUqsl2, in imaginary root vectors of Oq, refining those of Frenkel-Reshetikhin, and we explain representation-theoretic meaning of such refining.

from the abstract

Pith says

Machine review · deepseek-v4-flash · 10 Nov 2026 · what was read was not recorded · not checked by a person

It can be wrong. Challenge this review or reply to it.

A technically solid FRT presentation for the q-Onsager algebra, but the load-bearing injectivity of ι_Oq for the non-standard case (ε± ≠ 0) is not proved and is only cited for the standard case. This line is wrong

the referee pass did not run

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Are you an author? What you can do.

Not checked: figures, code, what the 75 references say.

What would settle it

Check whether the map ι_Oq defined by (2.14)–(2.15) is injective for generic non-zero ε_±. This can be done by constructing a non-zero element of ker(ι_Oq) for some choice of ε_± ≠ 0, e.g., by computing the image of the alternating generators (W_0, W_1, etc.) in L U_q sl_2 and checking if any non-trivial relation holds. Alternatively, verify that the coideal subalgebra generated by ι_Oq(W_0) and ι_Oq(W_1) in L U_q sl_2 is isomorphic to O_q for ε_± ≠ 0, using the PBW basis of O_q [Zh26b] and the known PBW basis of L U_q sl_2. If a non-zero element maps to zero, the central claim of the FRT presentation (which relies on ι_Oq being an embedding) is compromised.

from the skeptic's reading

How the review went

3 readings by deepseek-v4-flash · 10 Nov 2026

  1. Reader holds up, with conditions confidence moderate
  2. Skeptic partly agrees 19 s · 65,364 tokens read, 822 written
  3. Editor wrote the verdict above 19 s · 66,375 tokens read, 746 written

Not run on this paper: the referee, the simulated authors' defence.

Pith did not check this review's objections against the paper.

The review in full

The review in brief, machine-written

This paper does something genuinely useful: it gives an FRT-type presentation for the q-Onsager algebra as a counital comodule algebra over the quantum loop algebra LU_q sl_2, and it uses that presentation to derive images of generators in the Drinfeld second realization and to construct refined q-characters. The main theorems (4.13, 6.3, 7.7) are new, the derivations are detailed, and the paper connects four known presentations of Oq in a unified framework. The refined q-characters are a plausible extension of Frenkel–Reshetikhin's construction, and the explicit examples in Appendix D are helpful.

The soft spot is the injectivity of the map ι_Oq: Oq → LU_q sl_2. The paper asserts this in Remark 2.13, citing Kolb's theorem [Ko12, Thm.7.4 & Ex.7.6]. That theorem covers quantum symmetric pairs of standard type (ε± = 0). But the paper works with a 3-parameter family (k_+, ε_±) and explicitly uses the non-standard case (ε_± ≠ 0) in Sections 5–7, including the derivation of the refined q-characters. The authors do not provide a proof or a reference that injectivity extends to ε_± ≠ 0. The map ι_Oq is defined via (2.14)–(2.15) with arbitrary ε_±, and its injectivity is asserted with the same citation. If injectivity fails for ε_± ≠ 0, then the images of generators in LU_q sl_2 (Section 5) and the refined q-characters (Section 7) may not be well-defined or may not capture the full structure of Oq. The paper acknowledges Conjecture 2.16 about inequivalence of the 3-parameter family, but does not address the injectivity assumption for non-standard parameters. This is a load-bearing gap, not a minor oversight.

That said, the paper is otherwise careful and the authors flag their conjectures (2.16, 7.13) honestly. The central construction for the standard case (ε± = 0) is on solid ground and is already a contribution. The non-standard case is where the novelty lies, but it rests on an unverified premise.

Who this is for: specialists in quantum groups, integrable models, and quantum symmetric pairs. A reader working on q-Onsager algebras or boundary q-characters will find the FRT presentation and the refined q-characters valuable, provided the injectivity issue is resolved.

Recommendation: The paper deserves peer review—the standard-case results are solid and the framework is well-constructed. But the referee should ask the authors to either prove injectivity for ε_± ≠ 0 or restrict the claims to the standard case and state the non-standard results as conditional on that proof. I would not desk-reject this, but I would flag the injectivity gap as the primary revision request.

The strongest objection

The paper's central construction (FRT presentation, images of generators, refined q-characters) depends on the injective map ι_Oq: O_q → L U_q sl_2. For the standard case (ε± = 0), injectivity is a known result [Ko12, Thm.7.4 & Ex.7.6]. However, the paper works with a 3-parameter family (k_+, ε_±) and explicitly uses the non-standard case (ε_± ≠ 0) in the derivation of the refined q-characters (Section 7) and in the images of generators (Corollaries 5.6–5.12). The cited theorem [Ko12] covers quantum symmetric pairs of standard type, which correspond to ε_± = 0. The paper does not provide a proof or a reference that the injectivity extends to the non-standard case. The map ι_Oq is defined via (2.14)–(2.15) with arbitrary ε_±, and its injectivity is asserted in Remark 2.13 with the same citation. If injectivity fails for ε_± ≠ 0, then the images of generators in L U_q sl_2 (Section 5) and the refined q-characters (Section 7) may not be well-defined or may not capture the full structure of O_q. The paper acknowledges Conjecture 2.16 about inequivalence of the 3-parameter family, but does not address the injectivity assumption for non-standard parameters.

The reader's verdict identifies the injectivity of ι_Oq as the weakest assumption, citing [Ko12] for the standard case. However, the reader does not explicitly flag that the non-standard case (ε_± ≠ 0) is used in the refined q-characters and in the images of generators, and that the cited theorem may not cover that case. The paper itself does not provide a proof or reference for injectivity when ε_± ≠ 0. This is a load-bearing concern because the entire FRT presentation and its applications (including the refined q-characters) depend on ι_Oq being an embedding. The concrete test would settle whether the injectivity holds for non-standard parameters. If it does, the concern is resolved; if not, the central claim is weakened. The verdict remains CONDITIONAL because the paper already flags Conjecture 2.16 and the dependence on unpublished results, but the injectivity gap is more fundamental and not acknowledged as a limitation.

Pith's reading of the paper (a machine's summary, not the authors')

This paper is about a mathematical structure called the q-Onsager algebra, which appears in quantum physics when studying integrable spin chains and in algebra when studying symmetric pairs. The paper gives a new way to write this algebra's defining relations, called an FRT presentation, expressed through a matrix called the K-operator that satisfies a reflection equation. This is analogous to how quantum loop algebras can be presented through L-operators.

The authors position the q-Onsager algebra as a so-called counital comodule algebra over the quantum loop algebra U_q(sl_2). This framing provides a systematic way to embed the q-Onsager algebra into the larger loop algebra. They derive explicit formulas for how the algebra's generators map under this embedding and under the coaction, connecting four previously separate presentations of the q-Onsager algebra (q-Dolan-Grady, alternating, root-vectors, and Drinfeld type).

A concrete payoff is a refined version of the q-character map, a tool that encodes how representations of the quantum loop algebra decompose. The refined q-characters depend on two extra parameters and keep track of relations in the Grothendieck ring more directly than before. The paper closes with an algorithm for extracting such relations and a conjecture linking the refined characters to a universal K-matrix.

Core claim. The central claim is Theorem 4.13: the counital comodule algebra (O_q, δ_Oq, ε_Oq) admits an FRT type presentation. The defining relations of the q-Onsager algebra reduce to a single reflection equation R(u/v) K1(u) R(uv) K2(v) = K2(v) R(uv) K1(u) R(u/v), where the K-operator K(u) has a unique σ1-twisted LDU decomposition in terms of generating functions of real and imaginary root vectors. The coaction and counit are expressed through Ding-Frenkel L-operators and the most general solution of the reflection equation respectively. If this theorem holds, the image of O_q in the quantum loop algebra is fully described by a dressed K-operator, and the refined q-characters of Section 7 follow.

The premise it rests on. The weakest load-bearing premise is the injectivity of the map ι_Oq: O_q to L U_q sl_2, stated at Remark 2.13 and used throughout Sections 5 and 6. The paper cites Kolb's theorem for this injectivity ([Ko12, Thm.7.4 & Ex.7.6]), but the embedding is then used in the derivation of the images of all generating functions and in the coproduct formulas. The paper also fixes ρ = -(q^2 - q^-2)^2 (equation 3.1) without loss of generality by rescaling generators, and assumes q is not a root of unity. The conjectural parts (Conjectures 2.16 and 7.13) are explicitly flagged by the authors. The derivation of the refined q-character in Proposition 7.8 depends on the normalization factors defined implicitly by functional equations (7.34), (7.35), which are asserted to have unique solutions.

Check this review

Pith stored no record of this review's passes and took no fingerprint of it. Reviews made by code from 13 Nov 2026 on carry both.

How often reviews like this one are right

Reviews like this one: written by deepseek-v4-flash, where what was read was not recorded.

How often objections from reviews like this one are right: not yet measured

Every value above, in the review's public record (JSON)

Reviews by people

This review was written by a machine. No person has reviewed this paper on Pith yet. A scientist listed on Pith can review it for a fee, and their review is published here whatever it concludes.

Request a human review

How Pith checks papers · The full audit of this paper

The paper

Abstract

We introduce a concept of counital comodule algebra (B,δB,εB) over a Hopf 𝕂-algebra H, where δB:B → B ⊗ H and εB:B → 𝕂 are coaction and counit homomorphisms, respectively. This structure gives a canonical (counital) comodule algebra map ιB:B → H. In this paper, we study in details the case B = Oq, and H is the quantum loop algebra ℒUqsl2 for 𝕂 = ℂ. Here, Oq is the q-Onsager algebra with four presentations: (i) the q-Dolan-Grady type; (ii) the alternating type; (iii) the root vectors type; (iv) the Drinfeld type. For (Oq,δOq,εOq), in fact a 3-parameter family of counital comodule algebras, we establish a Faddeev-Reshetikhin-Takhtajan (FRT) type presentation, which is written in terms of a K-operator satisfying a reflection algebra relation. The coaction δOq (resp. ιOq) sends the K-operator to a `dressed' K-operator (resp. K-matrix) using Ding-Frenkel type L-operators of ℒUqsl2; the counit εOq sends the K-operator to the most general (non-diagonal) solution of the reflection equation. The FRT presentation allows to compute the image via δOq and ιOq of the generating functions of Oq for each presentation (ii)-(iv). Moreover, the images of Lu-Wang's generating functions of Oq in the so-called Drinfeld second realization DrℒUqsl2 are obtained, as well as their images via the (ordinary) coproduct of DrℒUqsl2, which enhance two theorems by Przeździecki. Finally, we apply our FRT presentation to the construction of new type q-characters for ℒUqsl2, in imaginary root vectors of Oq, refining those of Frenkel-Reshetikhin, and we explain representation-theoretic meaning of such refining.

The paper's own sentences, arranged, kept beside the review and separate from it. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

abstract compiled · 2026-11-11

The authors' main claim, as the classifier picked it out 0.52

“Finally, we apply our FRT presentation to the construction of new type $q$-characters for ${\cal L}U_qsl_2$, in imaginary root vectors of $O_q$, refining those of Frenkel-Reshetikhin, and we explain representation-theoretic meaning of such refining.”

How the main claim is stated: asserted 1.00

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.19 · compares with prior results 0.90 · mentions code or data availability 0.02

The abstract, sentence by sentence

This table labels the abstract only (arXiv listing abstract v1). The number is the probability the classifier gave the label.

SentenceRoleThe authors' own workStates the main conclusionStrength
We introduce a concept of counital comodule algebra $(B,\delta_B,\epsilon_B)$ over a Hopf ${\mathbb K}$-algebra $H$, where $\delta_B: B\rightarrow B \otimes H$ and $\epsilon_B: B\rightarrow {\mathbb K}$ are coaction and counit homomorphisms, respectively. contribution 0.75 0.73 0.04 asserted 0.99
This structure gives a canonical (counital) comodule algebra map $\iota_B: B \rightarrow H$. result 0.52 0.43 0.05 asserted 1.00
In this paper, we study in details the case $B=O_q$, and $H$ is the quantum loop algebra ${\cal L}U_qsl_2$ for ${\mathbb K}={\mathbb C}$. contribution 0.80 0.69 0.04 asserted 0.98
Here, $O_q$ is the $q$-Onsager algebra with four presentations: (i) the $q$-Dolan-Grady type; (ii) the alternating type; (iii) the root vectors type; (iv) the Drinfeld type. background 0.89 0.17 0.04 asserted 1.00
For $(O_q,\delta_{O_q},\epsilon_{O_q})$, in fact a 3-parameter family of counital comodule algebras, we establish a Faddeev-Reshetikhin-Takhtajan (FRT) type presentation, which is written in terms of a K-operator satisfying a reflection algebra relation. contribution 0.86 0.95 0.28 asserted 1.00
The coaction $\delta_{O_q}$ (resp. $\iota_{O_q}$) sends the K-operator to a `dressed' K-operator (resp. K-matrix) using Ding-Frenkel type L-operators of ${\cal L}U_qsl_2$; the counit $\epsilon_{O_q}$ sends the K-operator to the most general (non-diagonal) solution of the reflection equation. result 0.76 0.87 0.13 asserted 1.00
The FRT presentation allows to compute the image via $\delta_{O_q}$ and $\iota_{O_q}$ of the generating functions of $O_q$ for each presentation (ii)-(iv). result 0.65 0.92 0.10 asserted 0.99
Moreover, the images of Lu-Wang's generating functions of $O_q$ in the so-called Drinfeld second realization ${}^{Dr}\!{\cal L}U_qsl_2$ are obtained, as well as their images via the (ordinary) coproduct of ${}^{Dr}\!{\cal L}U_qsl_2$, which enhance two theorems by Prze\'zdziecki. result 0.87 0.92 0.11 asserted 1.00
Finally, we apply our FRT presentation to the construction of new type $q$-characters for ${\cal L}U_qsl_2$, in imaginary root vectors of $O_q$, refining those of Frenkel-Reshetikhin, and we explain representation-theoretic meaning of such refining. contribution 0.77 0.95 0.44 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.83 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00

What was examined, and what was not

Sources read

  • arXiv listing abstract v1

Not examined

  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers

Levels run

  • P abstract

Not run

  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

How the labels were made

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-11-11: 1 request, 7,830 input tokens.

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. This record as JSON

Figures (1)
Figure 1 of the paper
Figure 1. The path followed starting from Aq, the alternating central extension of the q-Onsager algebra. Here, Ω denotes an anti-automorphism of LUqsl2. The path leading to the above listed results is the following, summarized in

Figures are the authors', reproduced from the paper.

References (75)
  1. [1] A. Appel and B. Vlaar, Tensor K-matrices for quantum symmetric pairs , Commun. Math. Phys. 406 100 (2025); arXiv:2402.16676 https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16676 on PitharXiv
  2. [2] A.\ Appel and B.\ Vlaar, Boundary transfer matrices arising from quantum symmetric pairs , Indagationes Mathematicae 36 (2025) 1830-1862; arXiv:2410.21654 https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21654 on PitharXiv
  3. [3] P.\ Baseilhac, An integrable structure related with tridiagonal algebras , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 703 (2005), 605-619; arXiv:math-ph/0408025 https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0408025 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  4. [4] P.\ Baseilhac and S.\ Belliard, Generalized q -Onsager algebras and boundary affine Toda field theories , Lett.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 93 (2010), 213-228; https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1215 arXiv:0906.1215 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  5. [5] P.\ Baseilhac and S.\ Belliard, The half-infinite XXZ chain in Onsager's approach, Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 873 (2013), 550-583; arXiv:1211.6304 https://arxiv.org/abs/1211.6304 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  6. [6] P.\ Baseilhac and S.\ Belliard, Non-Abelian symmetries of the half-infinite XXZ spin chain , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 916 (2017) 373-385; https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.05390 arXiv:1611.05390 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  7. [7] P.\ Baseilhac and S.\ Belliard, An attractive basis for the q-Onsager algebra; arXiv:1704.02950 https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02950 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  8. [8] P.\ Baseilhac and N.\ Crampé, R-matrix presentation of classical Askey–Wilson algebras, Lett.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 109 , 2187-2207; arXiv:1806.07232 https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.07232 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  9. [9] A.J. Bracken, G.W. Delius, M.D. Gould, Y.-Z. Zhang, Infinite Families of Gauge-Equivalent R-Matrices and Gradations of Quantized Affine Algebras, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B8 : 3679-3691, 1994; arXiv:hep-th/9310183 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9310183 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [10] J. Beck, Braid group action and quantum affine algebras , Commun. Math. Phys. 165 555-568 on Pith
  11. [11] J. Beck, V. Chari and A. Pressley, An algebraic characterization of the affine canonical basis Duke Math. J. 99 (1999) 455-487; arXiv:math/9808060 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9808060 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [12] S. Belliard and V. Fomin, Generalized q-Onsager Algebras and Dynamical K-matrices , J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45 (2012) 025201; arXiv:1106.1317 https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.1317 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  13. [13] H.\ Boos, F.\ G o hmann, A.\ Kl u mper, K.\ S.\ Nirov and A.\ V.\ Razumov, Universal R-matrix and functional relations, Reviews in Math.\ Phys.\ 26 (2012) 1430005; arXiv:1205.1631 https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1631 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [14] P.\ Baseilhac, A.\ Gainutdinov and G.\ Lemarthe, Universal TT- and TQ-relations via centrally extended q-Onsager algebra , Nucl. Phys. B 1026 (2026) 117427; arXiv:2511.15876 https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.15876 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [15] P.\ Baseilhac and K.\ Koizumi, A deformed analogue of Onsager’s symmetry in the XXZ open spin chain, J.\ Stat.\ Mech.\ 0510 (2005), P005; arXiv:hep-th/0507053 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0507053 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [16] P.\ Baseilhac and S.\ Kolb, Braid group action and root vectors for the q-Onsager algebra, Transform.\ Groups 25 (2020) 363–389; arXiv:1706.08747 https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.08747 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [17] P.\ Baseilhac and K.\ Shigechi, A new current algebra and the reflection equation , Lett.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 92 (2010), 47-65; arXiv:0906.1482 https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.1482 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [18] V. Chari and A. Pressley, Quantum affine algebras , Comm. Math. Phys. 142 (1991), no.\,2, 261--283. 1137064 on Pith
  19. [19] V.\ Chari and A.\ Pressley, A guide to quantum groups , Cambridge university press (1995) on Pith
  20. [20] I. Damiani, A basis of type Poincar\'e-Birkhoff-Witt for the quantum algebra of U_q( sl _2) , J. Algebra 161 (1993) 291-310 on Pith
show 55 more
  1. [21] I. Damiani, Drinfeld realization of affine quantum algebras: the relations , Publ. RIMS Kyoto Univ. 48 (2012) 661–733; arXiv:1406.6729 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1406.6729 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  2. [22] I. Damiani, From the Drinfeld realization to the Drinfeld-Jimbo presentation of affine quantum algebras: the injectivity , Publ. RIMS Kyoto Univ. 51 (2015) 131–171; arXiv:1407.0341 https://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1407.0341 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  3. [23] I. Damiani, On the Drinfeld coproduct , Pure Appl. Math. Q. 20 (2024), no. 1, 171–232 on Pith
  4. [24] J. Ding and I. Frenkel, Isomorphism of two realizations of quantum affine algebra U_q( sl(n) ) , Commun. Math. Phys. 156 277-300 on Pith
  5. [25] L. Dolan and M. Grady, Conserved charges from self-duality , Phys. Rev. D 25 (1982) 1587-1604 on Pith
  6. [26] V.\ G.\ Drinfeld, Quantum groups , Proc.\ ICM-86 Berkeley 1 New York: Academic Press (1986) 789-820 on Pith
  7. [27] V.\ G.\ Drinfeld, A new realization of Yangians and quantized affine algebras, In Sov.\ Math.\ Dokl.\, Vol.\ 32 (1988) 212-216 on Pith
  8. [28] H.J.\ de Vega and A.\ Gonz\'alez-Ruiz, Boundary K-matrices for the XYZ, XXZ AND XXX spin chains , J.\ Phys.\ A 27 (1994) 6129; arXiv:hep-th/9306089 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306089 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  9. [29] E. Frenkel and E. Mukhin, Combinatorics of q –characters of finite dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras , Commun. Math. Phys. 216 (2001) 23-57; arXiv:math/9911112v3 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9911112v3 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  10. [30] I. Frenkel and N. Reshetikhin, Quantum affine algebras and holonomic difference equations , Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 146(1) (1992) 1-60 on Pith
  11. [31] E. Frenkel and N. Reshetikhin, The q -characters of representations of quantum affine algebras and deformations of W -algebras , Recent developments in quantum affine algebras and related topics ( R aleigh, NC , 1998), Contemp. Math., vol. 248, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI... on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  12. [32] L.D. Faddeev, N.Y. Reshetikhin and L.A. Takhtajan, Quantization of Lie groups and Lie algebras , Algebra and Analysis (Russian) 1.1 (1989) 118-206;\\ L.D. Faddeev, N.Y. Reshetikhin and L.A. Takhtajan, Quantization of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Yang-Baxter equation in Integra... on Pith
  13. [33] S.\ Ghoshal and A.\ B.\ Zamolodchikov, Boundary S matrix and boundary state in two-dimensional integrable quantum field theory, Int.\ J.\ Mod. Phys A 9 (1994) 3841-3885; arXiv:hep-th/9306002 https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9306002 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  14. [34] N. Hayaishi, K. Miki, L operators and Drinfeld's generators , J. Math. Phys. 39 (1998) 1623--1636; arXiv:q-alg/9705018 https://arxiv.org/abs/q-alg/9705018 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  15. [35] D. Hernandez, Drinfeld coproduct, quantum fusion tensor category and applications , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 95 (2007) 567–608; arXiv:math/0504269 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0504269 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  16. [36] T. Ito and P. Terwilliger, Tridiagonal pairs and the quantum affine algebra U_q( sl _2) , The Ramanujan Journal 13 (2007) 39-62; arXiv::math/0310042 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0310042 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  17. [37] T.\ Ito and P.\ Terwilliger, The augmented tridiagonal algebra, Kyushu J.\ of Math.\ 64 (2009) 81-144; https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.2889 arXiv:0904.2889 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  18. [38] T.\ Ito, K.\ Nomura, and P.\ Terwilliger, A classification of sharp tridiagonal pairs, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 435 (2011) 1857-1884; https://arxiv.org/abs/1001.1812 arxiv:1001.1812 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  19. [39] M. Jimbo, A q-difference analog of U( g ) and the Yang-Baxter equation , Lett. Math. Phys. 10 (1985) 63-69 on Pith
  20. [40] N. Jing, On Drinfeld realization of quantum affine algebras , Monster and Lie Algebras, ed. J. Ferrar and K. Harada, OSU Math Res Inst Publ. 7, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1998,195-206, https://arxiv.org/abs/9610035 q-alg/9610035 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  21. [41] N. Jing, M. Liu, A. Molev, Isomorphism between the R-matrix and Drinfeld presentations of quantum affine algebra: type C . Jour. Math. Phys. 61 (2020) 031701, https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.00204 arXiv:1903.00204 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  22. [42] N. Jing, M. Liu, A. Molev, Isomorphism between the R-Matrix and Drinfeld presentations of quantum affine algebra: Types B and D , SIGMA 16 (2020) 043, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03496 arXiv:1911.03496 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  23. [43] S.\ Kolb, Quantum symmetric Kac–Moody pairs, Adv.\ in Math.\ 267 (2014) 395-469; arXiv:1207.6036 https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6036 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  24. [44] A. Kuniba, M. Okado, A. Yoneyama, Reflection K matrices associated with an Onsager coideal of U_q(A_ n-1 ^ (1) , U_q(B_ n ^ (1) , U_q(D_ n ^ (1) and U_q(D_ n+1 ^ (2) J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 52 (2019) 375202; arXiv:1904.05653 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  25. [45] A. Kuniba and V. Pasquier, Quantum spin chains from Onsager algebras and reflection K-matrices , Nucl. Phys. B949 (2019) 114792; arXiv:1907.07881v2 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  26. [46] S.\ M.\ Khoroshkin and V.\ N.\ Tolstoy, The universal R-matrix for quantum untwisted affine Lie algebras, Funct.\ Anal.\ Appl.\ 26 (1992) 69-71 on Pith
  27. [47] P.\ P.\ Kulish and N.\ Y.\ Reshetikhin, Quantum linear problem for the sine-Gordon equation and higher representations, J.\ Sov.\ Math.\ 23 (1983), 2435-2441 on Pith
  28. [48] G.\ Lemarthe, Universal solutions the the reflection equation, the q -Onsager algebra and applications , PhD Thesis (2023) on Pith
  29. [49] G.\ Lemarthe, P.\ Baseilhac and A.\ Gainutdinov, Fused K-operators and the q -Onsager algebra (2023), SIGMA 22 (2026), 026, 74 pages; arXiv:2301.00781 https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00781 on PitharXiv
  30. [50] A. Liashyk and S.Z. Pakuliak, On the R-matrix realization of quantum loop algebras , SciPost Phys. 12 146 (2022); arXiv:2106.10666 https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10666 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  31. [51] J-R. Li, T. Przezdziecki, Boundary q -characters of evaluation modules for split quantum affine symmetric pairs , arXiv:2504.14042 https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14042 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  32. [52] K. Lu, Isomorphism between twisted q -Yangians and affine quantum groups: type AI , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2024), no. 24, 14519-14542; arXiv:2308.12484 https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.12484 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  33. [53] M. Lu, X. Pan, Drinfeld presentation of affine iquantum groups via i -Hopf algebras , arXiv:2610.30521 https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30521 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  34. [54] M.\ Lu and W.\ Wang, A Drinfeld type presentation of affine quantum groups I: split ADE type, Adv.\ in Math.\ 393 (2021) 108111; arXiv:2009.04542 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04542 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  35. [55] M. Lu, S. Ruan and W. Wang, Hall algebra of the projective line and q -Onsager algebra , Trans. AMS 376 (2023) 1475-1505; arXiv:2010.00646 https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.00646 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  36. [56] M. Lu and W. Wang, Hall algebras and quantum groups , arXiv:2209.12416 https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.12416 on PitharXiv
  37. [57] A. I. Molev, E. Ragoucy and P. Sorba, Coideal subalgebras in quantum affine algebras , Rev. Math. Phys. 15 (2003) 789–822; arXiv:math/0208140 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0208140 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  38. [58] K.\ Nomura and P.\ Terwilliger, Totally bipartite tridiagonal pairs, Electron. J. Linear Algebra 37 (2021), 434–491. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00332 arXiv:1711.00332 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  39. [59] L.\ Onsager, Crystal statistics. I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition, Phys.\ Rev.\ 65 (1944), 117 on Pith
  40. [60] T. Prze \'z dziecki, Drinfeld rational functions for affine Kac-Moody quantum symmetric pairs , Selecta Mathematica New Series 31 87 (2025); arXiv:2311.13705 https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13705 on PitharXiv
  41. [61] N.Y.\ Reshetikhin and M.A.\ Semenov-Tian-Shansky, Central extensions of quantum current groups, Lett.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 19 (1990) 133-142 on Pith
  42. [62] J.V. Stokman, Generalized Onsager algebras , Algebr. Represent. Theory 23 (2020) 1523-1541; arXiv:1810.07408 https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07408 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  43. [63] E.\ K.\ Sklyanin, Boundary conditions for integrable quantum systems , J.\ Phys.\ A 21 (1988) 2375-2389 on Pith
  44. [64] P. \ Terwilliger, The subconstituent algebra of an association scheme III. , J. Algebraic Combin. 2 (1993) 177-210 on Pith
  45. [65] P.\ Terwilliger, Two relations that generalize the q-Serre relations and the Dolan-Grady relations , Proc.\ of the Nagoya 1999 Int.\ workshop on phys.\ and combinatorics. Editors A.\ N.\ Kirillov, A. Tsuchiya, H.\ Umemura. 377-398; arXiv:math/0307016 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0307016 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  46. [66] P. \ Terwilliger, An action of the free product Z _2 Z _2 Z _2 on the q -Onsager algebra and its current algebra , Nucl. Phys. B 936 (2018) 306–319; arXiv:1808.09901 https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09901 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  47. [67] P.\ Terwilliger, The alternating central extension of the q-Onsager algebra , Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ 387 (2021) 1771–1819; arXiv:2103.03028 https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.03028 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  48. [68] P. Terwilliger, The q-Onsager algebra and its alternating central extension , Nucl. Phys. B 975 (2022) 115662; arXiv:2106.14041 https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.14041 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  49. [69] P.\ Terwilliger, \! The compact presentation for the alternating central extension of the q-Onsager algebra , J. Pure and Appl. Algebra 227 (2023) 107408; arXiv:2103.11229 https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.11229 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  50. [70] P.\ Terwilliger, A conjecture concerning the q-Onsager algebra , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 966 (2021) 115391; arXiv:2101.09860 https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.09860 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  51. [71] P.\ Terwilliger, The alternating central extension of the Onsager Lie algebra, Comm.\ Alg.\ Phys. 51 (2021) 330-349; arXiv:2104.08106 https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08106 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  52. [72] D. Uglov and L. Ivanov, sl(N) Onsager's algebra and integrability , J. Stat. Phys. 82 (1996) 87; arXiv:hep-th/9502068v1 https://arxiv.org/abs/9502068v1 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  53. [73] W. Zhang, A Drinfeld type presentation of affine ıquantum groups II: split BCFG type , Lett. Math. Phys. (2022) 112 89; arXiv:2102.03203 https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03203 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  54. [74] H. Zhu, A new PBW basis for the alternating central extension of the q-Onsager algebra , Nucl. Phys. B 1029 (2026) 17577; arXiv:2607.02849 https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.02849 on PithPith's reviewarXiv
  55. [75] H. Zhu, PBW bases and centralisers for the q-Onsager algebra ; arXiv:2607.10097 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.10097 on PithPith's reviewarXiv

Challenges and discussion

Disagree with the review, or know something it missed? Leave a comment, or challenge this review formally: a challenge becomes a permanent entry in this paper's record, and its decision is published here.

No comments yet.

Sign in to comment