pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27881 · v1 · pith:27HL5R2Xnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 💻 cs.CL · cs.AI

A Study of Temporal Fusion Strategies for Named Entity Recognition in Historical Texts

Emanuela Boros This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 04:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CL cs.AI
keywords named entity recognitionhistorical textstemporal fusionlate fusiondiachronic NLPFrench historical dataGerman historical data
0
0 comments X

The pith

Late fusion of temporal metadata yields more robust NER performance on historical texts than early fusion.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how to embed temporal metadata into named entity recognition models to handle the fact that entity forms and importance shift across centuries in historical documents. It compares early and late fusion approaches, using both absolute and relative time encodings inside Transformer models via mechanisms like cross-attention and adapters. Results on French and German historical collections indicate that late fusion produces stronger results that hold up better when tested across different time spans, with the largest gains appearing in the oldest and noisiest segments. This matters because many real archives lack clean modern language and require models that do not overfit to a single era. The work treats temporal information as an explicit input rather than hoping the base language model will infer it unaided.

Core claim

Late fusion strategies for injecting absolute or relative temporal representations into Transformer-based NER architectures produce more robust and temporally generalisable performance than early fusion, with the advantage most visible on early and noisy portions of French and German historical datasets.

What carries the argument

Late fusion mechanisms (cross-attention, adapters, concatenation) that add temporal metadata after the main Transformer layers rather than at the input.

If this is right

  • Late fusion improves robustness on diachronic NER tasks.
  • Gains concentrate in the earliest and noisiest time periods.
  • Both absolute and relative temporal encodings work with late fusion.
  • The benefit appears across both French and German historical collections.
  • Lightweight adapters and cross-attention suffice; no full retraining of the base model is required.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same late-fusion pattern could be tested on other sequence labelling tasks that cross time periods, such as event detection.
  • If temporal labels are only partially available, late fusion may still allow the model to fall back to the text-only path more gracefully than early fusion.
  • Extending the approach to decade-level or event-linked time representations might further reduce reliance on coarse period labels.

Load-bearing premise

The supplied temporal metadata for the historical datasets is accurate enough that fusion lets the model reason about time instead of simply memorising dataset patterns.

What would settle it

Run the same models after randomly shuffling or deleting the temporal metadata labels and measure whether late fusion still outperforms early fusion and the no-metadata baseline.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27881 by Emanuela Boros.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: F1 scores over time for French (top) and German (bottom) subsets of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Average F1 score difference between time-distance and absolute tem￾poral modes, computed for each fusion strategy. Positive values indicate im￾proved performance. like concat, relative, and adapter benefit from time-distance encoding (up [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Difference in F1 score for French (top) and German (bottom) between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of gain over baseline for each entity type, measured as the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Probing accuracy across models. Left: grouped by fusion type. Right: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Temporal variation poses a unique challenge for named entity recognition (NER) in historical texts, where entities drift in surface form and salience across time. While language models (LMs) have made progress in various NLP tasks, their ability to reason about temporality, especially in diachronic contexts, remains limited or at least, questionable. In this paper, we systematically study how temporal metadata can be structurally embedded into NER models using a range of lightweight fusion strategies. We experiment with both absolute and relative temporal representations, injected into Transformer-based architectures via early or late fusion mechanisms such as cross-attention, adapters, and concatenation. Our evaluations on French and German historical datasets reveal that late fusion strategies yield more robust and temporally generalisable performance, particularly in early and noisy periods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that temporal metadata can be effectively embedded into Transformer-based NER models for historical texts via lightweight fusion strategies (early/late fusion using cross-attention, adapters, and concatenation, with both absolute and relative temporal representations). Systematic experiments on French and German historical datasets show that late fusion strategies produce more robust and temporally generalisable NER performance, especially in early and noisy time periods.

Significance. If the central empirical claim holds after addressing controls, the work provides a useful comparative study of fusion mechanisms for incorporating temporal signals in diachronic NER. It offers concrete guidance on preferring late fusion for better generalization across time in historical corpora, which addresses a practical challenge in applying LMs to texts with entity drift. The systematic comparison of multiple strategies is a positive aspect of the experimental design.

major comments (1)
  1. [Experimental Design / Results] Experimental section: the design does not include a negative control (e.g., shuffling or ablating temporal metadata while preserving all other inputs, architecture, and splits) to test whether observed gains in early/noisy periods reflect genuine exploitation of temporality or merely fitting to dataset-specific artifacts correlated with the splits. This directly undermines the claim that late fusion enables 'temporally generalisable performance' and matches the weakest assumption in the evaluation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and results tables should report dataset sizes, number of periods, baseline comparisons, and statistical significance tests to allow readers to assess the magnitude and reliability of the late-fusion advantage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the experimental controls.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experimental Design / Results] Experimental section: the design does not include a negative control (e.g., shuffling or ablating temporal metadata while preserving all other inputs, architecture, and splits) to test whether observed gains in early/noisy periods reflect genuine exploitation of temporality or merely fitting to dataset-specific artifacts correlated with the splits. This directly undermines the claim that late fusion enables 'temporally generalisable performance' and matches the weakest assumption in the evaluation.

    Authors: We agree that a negative control (e.g., shuffling temporal metadata while keeping all other inputs and splits fixed) is necessary to isolate whether gains stem from genuine temporal signal exploitation rather than split-correlated artifacts. We will add these ablation experiments to the revised experimental section and update the claims about temporal generalisability to reflect the new results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical comparison of fusion strategies

full rationale

The paper presents an empirical study comparing early/late fusion mechanisms (cross-attention, adapters, concatenation) on French/German historical NER datasets using temporal metadata. No equations, derivations, or parameter-fitting steps are described that could reduce a claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The central claim (late fusion yields better temporal generalization) rests on reported performance metrics rather than any self-definitional, fitted-prediction, or self-citation load-bearing structure. External benchmarks (dataset splits, fusion variants) remain independent of the reported outcomes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions about Transformer extensibility and data quality rather than introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Transformer architectures can incorporate metadata via cross-attention, adapters, or concatenation without breaking core functionality.
    Invoked when describing the fusion mechanisms tested.
  • domain assumption Temporal metadata for the historical texts is reliable and correctly aligned with the documents.
    Required for the fusion experiments to be meaningful.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5648 in / 1179 out tokens · 39957 ms · 2026-06-29T04:49:58.221818+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Agarwal, P., Strötgen, J., del Corro, L., Hoffart, J., Weikum, G.: di- aned: Time-aware named entity disambiguation for diachronic corpora (2018), https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-2109/

    2018

  2. [2]

    Beniwal, H., Patel, D., D, K.N., Ladia, H., Yadav, A., Singh, M.: Remember this event that year? assessing temporal information and reasoning in large language models (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11997

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the 24th conference on computational natural language learning

    Boros, E., Hamdi, A., Pontes, E.L., Cabrera-Diego, L.A., Moreno, J.G., Sidere, N., Doucet, A.: Alleviating digitization errors in named entity recognition for histor- ical documents. In: Proceedings of the 24th conference on computational natural language learning. pp. 431–441 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Chang, H., Ye, C., Tao, Z., Wu, J., Yang, Z., Ma, Y., Huang, X., Chua, T.S.: A comprehensive evaluation of large language models on temporal event forecasting (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.11638

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media

    Chen, S., Neves, L., Solorio, T.: Mitigating temporal-drift: A sim- ple approach to keep NER models crisp. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media. pp. 163–169. Association for Computational Linguis- tics, Online (Jun 2021). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.socialnlp-1.14, https://www.aclweb.org/...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.socialnlp-1.14 2021

  6. [6]

    https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00459, https://aclanthology.org/2022.tacl-1.15/

    Cole, J.R.: Time-aware language models as temporal knowledge bases (2022). https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00459, https://aclanthology.org/2022.tacl-1.15/

    work page doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00459 2022

  7. [7]

    Ding, X., Wang, L.: Do language models understand time? (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.13845

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Ehrmann, M., Romanello, M., Bircher, S., Clematide, S.: Introducing the clef 2020 hipe shared task: Named entity recognition and linking on historical newspapers. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_68, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_68

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_68 2020

  9. [9]

    Ehrmann, M., Romanello, M., Doucet, A., Clematide, S.: Introducing the hipe 2022 shared task: Named entity recognition and linking in multilin- gual historical documents. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99739-7_44, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99739-7_44 10 E. Boros

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99739-7_44 2022

  10. [10]

    In: Faggioli, G., Ferro, N., Han- bury, A., Potthast, M

    Ehrmann, M., Romanello, M., Najem-Meyer, S., Doucet, A., Clematide, S.: Extended overview of HIPE-2022: Named Entity Recognition and Link- ing in Multilingual Historical Documents. In: Faggioli, G., Ferro, N., Han- bury, A., Potthast, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Working Notes of CLEF 2022 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum. vol. 3180. CEUR- WS...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.6979577 2022

  11. [11]

    Gade, A., Jetcheva, J.: It’s about time: Incorporating temporality in retrieval aug- mented language models (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13222

    work page arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    González-Gallardo, C.E., Boros, E., Giamphy, E., Hamdi, A., Moreno, J.G., Doucet, A.: Injecting temporal-aware knowledge in historical named entity recognition. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28244-7_24, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28244-7_24

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-28244-7_24 2023

  13. [13]

    Gruber, R., Abdallah, A., Färber, M., Jatowt, A.: Complextempqa: A large-scale dataset for complex temporal question answering (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04866

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Gurnee, W., Tegmark, M.: Language models represent space and time (2024), https://openreview.net/forum?id=jE8xbmvFin

    2024

  15. [15]

    a humanities informed approach (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04351

    Hiltmann, T., Dröge, M., Dresselhaus, N., Grallert, T., Althage, M., Bayer, P., Eckenstaler, S., Mendi, K., Schmitz, J.M., Schneider, P., Sczeponik, W., Skibba, A.: Ner4all or context is all you need: Using llms for low-effort, high- performance ner on historical texts. a humanities informed approach (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.04351

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Jain, R., Sojitra, D., Acharya, A., Saha, S., Jatowt, A., Dandapat, S.: Do language models have a common sense regarding time? revisiting tem- poral commonsense reasoning in the era of large language models (2023), https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.418/

    2023

  17. [17]

    Jia, Z., Abujabal, A., Roy, R.S., Strötgen, J., Weikum, G.: Tempquestions: A benchmark for temporal question answering. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191536, https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191536

    work page doi:10.1145/3184558.3191536 2018

  18. [18]

    Ko, D., Lee, J.S., Kang, W., Roh, B., Kim, H.J.: Large language mod- els are temporal and causal reasoners for video question answering (2023), https://aclanthology.org/2023.emnlp-main.261/

    2023

  19. [19]

    Dynamic, and Multimodal (2022)

    Liang, K., Meng, L., Liu, M., Liu, Y., Tu, W., Wang, S., Zhou, S., Liu, X., Sun, F.: A survey of knowledge graph reasoning on graph types: Static. Dynamic, and Multimodal (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    Liu, L., Yu, S., Wang, R., Ma, Z., Shen, Y.: How can large language models un- derstand spatial-temporal data? (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14192

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Liu, R., Li, C., Tang, H., Ge, Y., Shan, Y., Li, G.: St-llm: Large language models are effective temporal learners (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    In: Pro- ceedings of the AAAIConference on Artificial Intelligence.vol

    Lu, Y., Zhou, Y., Li, J., Wang, Y., Liu, X., He, D., Liu, F., Zhang, M.: Knowledge editing with dynamic knowledge graphs for multi-hop question answering. In: Pro- ceedings of the AAAIConference on Artificial Intelligence.vol. 39, pp. 24741–24749 (2025)

    2025

  23. [23]

    Nako, P., Jatowt, A.: Navigating tomorrow: Reliably assessing large language models performance on future event prediction (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.05925

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Nylund, K., Gururangan, S., Smith, N.A.: Time is encoded in the weights of fine- tuned language models (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.13401 Temporal Fusion Strategies for NER in Historical Texts 11

    work page arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Papadopoulos, V., Wenger, J., Hongler, C.: Arrows of time for large language models (2024), https://openreview.net/forum?id=UpSe7ag34v

    2024

  26. [26]

    Pawłowski, A., Walkowiak, T.: Nlp for digital humanities: Processing chronological text corpora (2024), https://aclanthology.org/2024.nlp4dh-1.10/

    2024

  27. [27]

    In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence

    Perez, E., Strub, F., De Vries, H., Dumoulin, V., Courville, A.: Film: Visual rea- soning with a general conditioning layer. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. vol. 32 (2018)

    2018

  28. [28]

    Qiu, Y., Zhao, Z., Ziser, Y., Korhonen, A., Ponti, E.M., Cohen, S.B.: Are large language models temporally grounded? (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08398

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Rijhwani, S., Preotiuc-Pietro, D.: Temporally-informed analysis of named entity recognition (2020), https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.acl-main.680/

    2020

  30. [30]

    In: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining

    Rosin, G.D., Guy, I., Radinsky, K.: Time masking for temporal language models. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. pp. 833–841 (2022)

    2022

  31. [31]

    Ruiz, A.G., de la Rosa, T., Borrajo, D.: On the temporal question- answering capabilities of large language models over anonymized data (2025), https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07646

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Schweter, S., März, L., Schmid, K., Çano, E.: hmbert: Historical multilingual language models for named entity recognition (2022), https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15575

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    In: Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J., Okazaki, N

    Song, R., He, S., Gao, S., Cai, L., Liu, K., Yu, Z., Zhao, J.: Multi- lingual knowledge graph completion from pretrained language models with knowledge constraints. In: Rogers, A., Boyd-Graber, J., Okazaki, N. (eds.) Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL

  34. [34]

    7709–7721

    pp. 7709–7721. Association for Computational Linguistics, Toronto, Canada (Jul 2023). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.488, https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-acl.488/

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.488 2023

  35. [35]

    Tan, Q., Ng, H.T., Bing, L.: Towards benchmarking and improving the temporal reasoning capability of large language models (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08952

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    In: Bastings, J., Belinkov, Y., Dupoux, E., Giulianelli, M., Hupkes, D., Pinter, Y., Sajjad, H

    Thukral, S., Kukreja, K., Kavouras, C.: Probing language models for under- standing of temporal expressions. In: Bastings, J., Belinkov, Y., Dupoux, E., Giulianelli, M., Hupkes, D., Pinter, Y., Sajjad, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP. pp. 396–406. Association for Computational ...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2021.blackboxnlp- 2021

  37. [37]

    Ushio, A., Barbieri, F., Sousa, V., Neves, L., Camacho-Collados, J.: Named entity recognition in twitter: A dataset and analysis on short-term temporal shifts (2022), https://aclanthology.org/2022.aacl-main.25/

    2022

  38. [38]

    Wallat, J., Jatowt, A., Anand, A.: Temporal blind spots in large language models (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12078

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Xiong, S., Payani, A., Kompella, R., Fekri, F.: Large language models can learn temporal reasoning (2024), https://aclanthology.org/2024.acl-long.563/

    2024

  40. [40]

    Yin, X., Jiang, J., Yang, L., Wan, X.: History matters: Temporal knowledge editing in large language model (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05497

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    Zheng, L.N., Dong, C.G., Zhang, W.E., Yue, L., Xu, M., Maennel, O., Chen, W.: Understanding why large language models can be ineffective in time series analysis: The impact of modality alignment (2024), https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12326

    work page arXiv 2024